Staff and NavAid, on behalf of the Truckee Tahoe Airport District, … · •FAA NextGen Get Smart...
Transcript of Staff and NavAid, on behalf of the Truckee Tahoe Airport District, … · •FAA NextGen Get Smart...
Proprietary Information 1
Acknowledgements
Staff and NavAid, on behalf of the Truckee Tahoe
Airport District, acknowledges a few important
points related to Flight Tracking at KTRK
• Airport Operations impact on the community
• The District works to provide the safest aeronautical
environment while recognizing its role as an airport
sponsor, operator, and supporter of Federal
Regulation and Sponsorship Assurance
• Technology such as ADSB and UAT Flight Tracking
has the potential of enhancing operational capacity at
the airport
Proprietary Information 2
KTRK Flight Tracking System
Technology Refresh
KTRK Board Briefing
Airport’s, CMAS and Vendor Site
Visits
Prepared by: Joseph LaMacchia and KTRK Aviation and Community Services
November 5, 2015
Proprietary Information 3
Agenda
• Presented and Proposed Flight Tracking
System Transition Timeline
• Recommendations from “May Board Meeting”
• Overview of Site Visits
– East Hampton Airport KHTO
– ANPC
– FAA Denver Center
– Rifle Airport KRIL
• Conclusion and Next Steps
• Open Dialog
Proprietary Information 4
Proposed MLAT Flight
Tracking Transition Timeline
Proprietary Information 5
Recommendations for the
Next 12 Months Presented May 2015
• Board Approved moving forward with the Discovery
Portion of the Transition Timeline
– Visit Like Size Airports with ADSB / UAT Flight
Tracking Systems and FAA, Oakland Center (ZOA)
• Leverage the Current Investment in Flight Tracking as Long
as Possible
– Current Technology Serves Airport Operations and
Community Needs
• Safety, Community Annoyance, Noise, and Master
Planning
• Conduct Market Survey for Potential Products, Capabilities,
and Costs
• Brief KTRK Board Member's on Progress
Proprietary Information 6
Overview and Summary of
Site Visits
• East Hampton Airport’s “Seasonal
Tower”
• ANPC “Surveillance Manufacture”
• Denver Center ARTCC “Using WAM
to Control Aircraft to Selected Resort
Airports”
• Rifle Garfield Airport “End User of the
CMAS System”
Proprietary Information 7
Seasonal Towers and Visual
Charted Flight Procedures• According to FAA Order 7110.79D Received from Oakland
Center– To Published a Charted Visual Flight Procedure the Airport
Must: Comply with the following criteria to ensure safety is not compromised:
• Radar control required
• Operating airport traffic control tower required at airport served by a CVFP
• CVFPs shall be contained within controlled airspace.
• CVFPs shall be developed to a specific runway. A runway to which a CVFP is published shall be equipped with a visual or electronic vertical guidance system.
• CVFPs shall originate at or near, and be designed around, prominent visual landmarks. When a determination is made that a landmark cannot be readily identified at night, the procedure shall be annotated “Procedure Not Authorized at Night.”
Proprietary Information 8
East Hampton Airport HTO
• Purpose and Objective of Site Visit
– Review Experiences with Seasonal
Tower Operations
– Review Benefits to Airport and
Community
– Understand the make up 23,000+
Yearly Noise Complaints
– Performance of Tower Contractor
– Estimated Costs
Proprietary Information 9
East Hampton Airport HTO
• Review Experiences with Seasonal Tower Operations
– Seasonal Tower Has Been Contracted with Robinson Tower Company for 4+ years
– The Tower Operates May – September to Provide Advisory Services “MOA Required with TRACON”
– The Cost of Tower is ~ $100,000 per Month including Personnel
– Benefits to Airport Safety and Monitoring of Helicopters Operations During Peak Season for Noise Mitigation
– 23,000 Noise Complaints Occur During Peak Operations, including overflights of HTO
– HTO does not have an Airport Community Advisory Board
– NO UNINTENDED OPERATIONAL CONSEQUENCES
Proprietary Information 10
ANPC Visit
September 23, 2015
• Purpose and Objective of Site Visit
– Evaluate ANPC’s Transponder Landing
and Surveillance System as Suitable
Replacement for KTRK
Proprietary Information 11
APNC Site Visit
Pro’s
• Smaller Hardware
Foot Print Reduces
Life Cycle Costs
• Provides Surveillance
and ILS Capabilities
• Interrogator Approved
by FAA
Con’s
• ADSB and UAT
Capabilities Need to
be Added and
Certified by FAA
• Timeline for Proposed
Upgrades
In summary, the ANPC Transponder Landing System is innovative technology with unique capabilities suited to increase safety for mountainous and terrain-challenged
airports. The major hurdles for the ANPC System are FAA certifications and timeframe to accomplish them.
Proprietary Information 12
Denver Center ARTCC
• Arrived Oct 19, 2015
• Topics Discussed During Site Visit
– Safety Benefits
– Realistic Timeline
– Operational Capacity within
Mountainous Airspace
– Unexpected Hurdles or Consequences
– Costs and Unexpected Costs
Proprietary Information 13
Denver Center ARTCC
Denver Center Pro’s Con’s Remarks
Safety Benefits √ Greatly improved; can maintain
normal separation vs. one in one
out scenario
Project TimeLine √ Longer than anticipated but worth
the wait
Operational Capacity √ Operational Capacity was greatly
improved due to the CMAS System.
Key areas of improvement: Safety
of Flight, Situational Awareness,
Reduced Aircraft Incidents
Unexpected Consequences √ No significant negative impacts
reported by end users or
communities being serviced by CMAS
System
Costs √ Higher than originally expected
improved safety was worth it
ARTCC Site Visit Feedback, Observations, and Comments
from FAA
Proprietary Information 14
Rifle Garfield Airport KRIL
• Arrived Oct 20, 2015
• Topics Discussed During Site Visit
– Safety Benefits
– Improve Arrival and Departure
Procedures
– Community Acceptance / Pushbacks
– Costs
– Timeline expectations
Proprietary Information 15
Rifle Garfield Airport KRIL
Rifle Pro’s Con’s Remarks
Safety Benefits √ Significantly improved Safety
record, KRIL airport is very similar
to KTRK , uncontrolled airspace
class E with no tower
Project TimeLine √ Longer than anticipated to
implement and realize benefits,
well worth the wait
Airport Capacity √ KRIL Invested $57M dollars to
improve the airport runways to
make KRIL a World Class GA Jet
Airport, this couple with CMAS
created a positive economic
impact to the community with
improved aircraft safety
Unexpected
Consequences
√ No direct community impact due
to capacity increases, community
has very low noise complaint rate
Feedback, Observation, and Comments from Site Visit
Proprietary Information 16
Proposed MLAT Flight
Tracking Transition Timeline
Proprietary Information 17
Conclusions and Next Steps
• Improved Safety and Capacity was the common theme from everyone!
• CMAS System Required State, Federal, and Local Representation to Fund, Coordinate and Approve the Project
• NavAid Recommends KTRK Proceed with Market Survey to Gauge Vendors Solutions and Proposed Costs
• Coordinate and Conduct Meeting with Oakland Center and Western Service Center
Proprietary Information 18
Benefits Realized by the KTRK
Community and Airport
• Safety within the District’s Airspace and Surrounding
Region
• FAA NextGen Compliant System with Approvals Provides
Stability to KTRK Flight Tracking for the Foreseeable
Future
• Will Detect Gilders, Balloon's, and Unmanned Aerial
Vehicles (UAV) that are properly equipped >55lbs
• Improved RNAV Procedures and Airspace Management
• Measurement Tools to Reduce Community Annoyance
• Increase in Airport Revenues and Enhanced Incentives
• Increase FAA AIP Money for Airport Upgrades
• Safety Enhanced during high Capacity periods if System is
Integrated into NAS/FAA
Proprietary Information 19
Questions?
Thank You for Your Attention
Proprietary Information 20
Acknowledgements
Staff and NavAid, on behalf of the Truckee Tahoe
Airport District, acknowledges a few important
points related to Flight Tracking at KTRK
• Operations from the Airport have an Impact on the
community
• The District works to provide the safest, aeronautical
environment while recognizing its role as an airport
sponsor, operator, and supporter of Federal
Regulation and Sponsorship Assurance
• Technology such as ADSB and UAT Flight Tracking
has the potential of enhancing operational capacity at
the airport
Proprietary Information 21
Abbreviations List
• Advance Navigation Positioning Corporation (ANPC)
• Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS Mode 3A/C)
• Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADSB)
• Colorado Mountain Air System (CMAS)
• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
• Facility Transmitting Authorization (FTA)
• Flight Information System Broadcast (FIS-B)
• Global Positioning System (GPS)
• Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)
• Truckee Tahoe Airport (KTRK)
• Multilateration System (MLAT)
• Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen)
• Noise Operations and Monitoring System (NOMS)
• Traffic Information Service Broadcast (TIS-B)
• Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
• Universal Access Transceiver (UAT)
• Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS)
• Wide Area Multilateration System (WAM)
• Oakland Center (ZOA)
Proprietary Information 22
References
• FAA NextGen Priorities 10/17/2014
• FAA General Aviation Report 06/02/2014
• FAA NextGen Get Smart ADSB 06/2014
• FAA NextGen Get Smart WAM 07/2014
• FAA Business Case for NextGen 6/2014
• ADSB Essentials Industry Paper 06/2014
• Stanford University Research Paper Evaluation of UAT vs. ADSB Transponder 05/2014
• FAA Safety Briefing Jan/Feb 2015
• MITRE NextGen Independent Assessment and Recommendations Oct 2014
• NextGen Works for Airports 06/2014