STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE GRAVITY DAM USING … · STAAD Foundation to provide engineers...
Transcript of STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE GRAVITY DAM USING … · STAAD Foundation to provide engineers...
STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE GRAVITY DAM
USING STAAD PRO
Mr. Manoj Nallanathel [1], Mr. B. Ramesh [2], AB. Pavan Kumar Raju [3]
Associate Professor [1], Professor [2], Bachelor of Engineering [3]
Department of Civil Engineering, Saveetha School of engineering,
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technological Sciences, Chennai-602105, TN, INDIA.
[email protected] [1], [email protected] [2], [email protected] [3]
Abstract:
A gravity dam is a solid structure, made of
concrete or masonry, built throughout a river to
create a reservoir on its upstream. The segment of
the gravity dam is approximately triangular in
shape, with its apex at its pinnacle and most width
at backside. The phase is so proportioned that it
resists the numerous forces acting on it by using
its very own weight. In this paper analysis of dam
is achieved the use of STAAD.pro software
program. STAAD.pro is extensively used for
multi-storied homes with beam and columns. But
STAAD.pro can examine any form of element
which include, plate, shell or strong further to
beam individuals. So, in the software with
appropriate facts, dam is modelled with stable
factors. Result of stresses and pressure contours
are defined on the end of paper. The goal of paper
is to have a course of analysis of dam thinking
about solid elements using STAAD.pro and
conventional methods. STAAD.pro is computer
software, which is used for stability and stress
analysis of structures. Dam is such a massive
structure; to evaluate such structure manually is
very tedious and long timing process so it’s easy
to evaluate the dam stability STAAD.pro.
Key words: Gravity dam, concrete, moments,
frictional force, stability, STAAD Pro v8i
Introduction:
The gravity dam is constructed with the concrete
or masonry. The purpose of the dam is to store,
hold water and to control the floods, to supply
water to households, irrigation, energy
generation, livestock water supplies, pollution
control etc..,. The dam are classified according to
the type of material used in construction, the way
dam resist the loads, type of the structure etc..,.
The materials used for construction of dams
include earth, rock, tailings from mining or
milling, concrete, masonry, steel, timber,
miscellaneous materials and any combination of
all these materials. The following are the different
dams as their shape, size and use of it.
Embankment dams
International Journal of Pure and Applied MathematicsVolume 119 No. 17 2018, 297-310ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)url: http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/Special Issue http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/
297
Gravity dams
Buttress dams
Arch dams.
Coffer dams.
Essentially a gravity dam should fulfill the
subsequent standards:
1. It will be secure in opposition to overturning
at any horizontal role in the dam at the touch
with the inspiration or inside the basis.
2. It have to be secure towards sliding at any
horizontal plane within the dam, at the contact
with the inspiration or alongside any geological
feature within the foundation.
3. The segment need to be so proportional that the
allowable stresses in each the concrete and the
foundation must no longer exceed.
Objectives:-
The main objective is to determine the stability of
the concrete gravity dam with different load
conditions by varying the water level. The
stability of concrete gravity dam is analyzed by
using STAAD Pro. With the three different
conditions are
When the reservoir is empty.
When the reservoir is half fill.
When the reservoir is fully fill.
About STAAD.pro: -
STAAD Pro is a structural analysis and design
computer program originally developed by
Research Engineers International at Yorba Linda,
CA in 1997. In late 2005, Research Engineers
International was bought by Bentley Systems. An
older version called STAAD-III for Windows is
used by Iowa State University for educational
purposes for civil and structural engineers. The
commercial version, STAAD Pro, is one of the
most widely used structural analysis and design
software products worldwide. It supports several
steel, concrete and timber design codes. It can
make use of various forms of analysis from the
traditional 1st order static analysis, 2nd order p-
delta analysis, geometric non-linear analysis,
Pushover analysis (Static-Non Linear Analysis)
or a buckling analysis. It can also make use of
various forms of dynamic analysis from modal
extraction to time history and response spectrum
analysis. In recent years it has become part of
integrated structural analysis and design solutions
mainly using an exposed API called Open
STAAD pro to access and drive the program
using a Visual Basic macro system included in
the application or by including Open STAAD
functionality in applications that themselves
include suitable programmable macro systems.
Additionally, STAAD Pro has added direct links
to applications such as RAM Connection and
STAAD Foundation to provide engineers
working with those applications which handle
design post processing not handled by STAAD
Pro itself. Another form of integration supported
by the STAAD Pro is the analysis schema of the
CIM steel Integration Standard, version 2
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
298
commonly known as CIS/2 and used by a number
modeling and analysis applications.
Forces on the concrete gravity dam
1. Water pressure: -
Water Pressure (p) is the most major external
force acting on such a dam. The horizontal water
pressure, exerted by the weight of the water
stored on the upstream side of the dam can be
estimated from rule of hydrostatic pressure
distribution. This is the largest external force
acting on the dam. It has the largest capacity for
disturbing the stability of the dam. It is a
horizontal force which acts at the C.G. of the
pressure distribution diagram, due to water. The
pressure distribution diagram is always triangular
with zero value at surface of the water and
increasing linearly to maximum at the base of the
dam. The value of maximum horizontal pressure
at base of the dam is w.h where w is the density
of water in kg/m3 and h the depth of water in
meters. Since pressure distribution diagram due
to water is triangular, the value of the total
horizontal pressure (P) due to water will be area
of the triangle.
2. Earthquake Forces: - The effect of
earthquake is equivalent to acceleration to the
foundation of the dam in the direction in which
the wave is travelling at the moment. Earthquake
wave may move in any direction and for design
purposes, it is resolved into the vertical and
horizontal directions. On an average, a value of
0.1 to 0.15g (where g = acceleration due to
gravity) is generally sufficient for high dams in
seismic zones. In extremely seismic regions and
in conservative designs, even a value of 0.3g may
sometimes by adopt. Vertical acceleration
reduces the unit weight of the dam material and
that of water is to(1-kv) times the original unit
weight, where kv is the value of g accounted
against earthquake forces, i.e. 0.1 when 0.1g is
accounted for earthquake forces. The horizontal
acceleration acting towards the reservoir causes a
momentary increase in water pressure and the
foundation and dam accelerate towards the
reservoir and the water resists the movement
owing to its inertia. The extra pressure exerted by
this process is known as hydrodynamic pressure.
3. Silt Pressure: -
If h is the height of silt deposited, then the forces
exerted by this silt in addition to the external
water pressure, can be represented by Rankin’s
formula psilt =12γgh2ka acting at h/3 from the
base. Where, ka = coefficient of active earth
pressure of silt = 1−𝑠𝑖𝑛∅1+𝑠𝑖𝑛∅ ∅ = angle of
internal friction of soil, cohesion neglected.
γs= submerged unit weight of silt material. h =
height of silt deposited.
4. Wave Pressure: - Waves are generated on the
surface of the reservoir by the blowing winds,
which exert a pressure on the downstream side.
Wave pressure depends upon wave height which
is given by the equation
hw =0.32√𝑝𝑣+0.763-0.271×F1/4 for F < 32 km,
and hw =0.32√𝑝𝑣 for F > 32 km Where hw is the
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
299
height of water from the top of crest to bottom of
trough in meters
5. Ice Pressure: - The ice which may be formed
on the water surface of the reservoir in cold
countries may sometimes melt and expand. The
dam face is subjected to the thrust and exerted by
the expanding ice. This force acts linearly along
the length of the dam and at the reservoir level.
The magnitude of this force varies from 250 to
1500 KN/m2 depending upon the temperature
variations. On an average, a value 500 KN/m2
may be taken under ordinary circumstances.
6. Weight of dam: - The weight of dam and its
foundation is a major resisting force
Methodology:-
A studies offers the primary functions and
corporation of STAADPRO, a software that has
been advanced for the static and seismic stability
opinions of concrete gravity dams. STAADPRO
is primarily based at the gravity approach the
usage of rigid frame equilibrium and beam idea
to carry out pressure analyses, compute crack
lengths, and protection elements. Seismic
analyses can be executed the usage of both the
pseudo-static and a simplified response spectrum
approach. The Curtain Wall is designed the usage
of STAADPRO to face up to and manage all of
the imposed masses on it in addition to preserve
air and water from penetrating within the
constructing. The masses imposed at the curtain
wall are transferred to the constructing structure
thru structural interface (i.e. Brackets) which
attaches the mullions to the constructing
Design steps in STAAD.pro
Step - 1: Creation of nodal points. Based on the
positioning of plan we entered the node points
into the STAAD file
Step - 2: Representation of plates. By using, add
plate command we had drawn the plates between
the corresponding node points.
Step - 3: 3D view of structure. Here we have used
the Transitional repeat command in Y direction
get the 3D view of structure.
Step - 4: Supports and property assigning. After
the creation of structure, the supports at the base
of structure are specified as fixed. In addition, the
Materials were specified and cross section of
plate members was assigned.
Step - 5: 3D rendering view. After assigning the
property the 3d rendering view of the structure
can be shown
Step - 6: Assigning of wind loads. Wind loads are
defined as per IS 875 PART 3 based on intensity
calculated and exposure factor. Then loads are
added in load case details in +X,-X, +Z,-Z
directions.
Step - 7: Assigning of dead loads.
Step -8 :- Assigning of load combinations
DL+LL, DL+LL+UPL,DL+LL+UPL+WL
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
300
multiple factor of 1,1.5& wind load having
different directions of X+ ,X- ,Z+ ,Z-
Step-9:- Concrete Design by using STAAD.pro
software for analysis part and assign all required
parameters also. The code books are IS 456: 2000
& SP 16:2000.
Step-10:- save and run the file for analysis print.
Check how many errors for dam from this
process, if not getting any results so can we
modified & find out where did we mistaken.
Finally post processing & print out of analysis
can be taken out.
Step-11:- After analysis part of entire gravity
dam only applicable to start STAAD. Foundation
v8i for entire building design separately. We can
design based upon our requirements types of
foundations, depth of footings.
Calculations:-
Case 1 :-when the reservoir is empty
Self-weight-
W= l x b x h x γcon
W1= 4.6mx47mx100mx24x9.81
=509021.28kN
W2=1/2x30.4x40x2.4x9.81x100
=1431475.2kN
Case 2:- when the reservoir is maximum level
Self-weight-
W1=509021.28kN
W2=1431475.2Kn
Water pressure:-
PW=ρgh
=1000x9.81x40mts
PW=392400N/m
=392.4KN/m2
Water pressure=1/2x40x392.4
=7848kN
Acts on 40/30=13.34mts from the base
Uplift pressure:-
At heel
P’=γh
=1000x9.81x40
=392400N/m =392.4kN/m
At toe
P’’=γh’
=1000x9.8x10
=98100N/m =98.1kN/m
Over turning moment:-
Moment over toe
Stabilizing moments
M1=w1x32.7
=509021.28x32.7 =16644995.86kNm
M2=w2x20.26mts
=1431475.2x20.26 =29001687.55kNm
M1+m2=45646683.41kNm
Opposing moments:-
Mw1=784800x13.34
=10469232 KN.m
Mup1=490506x20.26m
=9937530kNm
Mw1 +mup1 =10469232 + 9937530 KN.m
Factor of safety=45646683/20406762
=2.24 >2 safe
Sliding:-
Friction ff=μ.N
=0.7(509021.28 + 1431475.2
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
301
1358347.536
Wp=784800
F.o.s =1358347.536/784800
=1.73 >1.5
Safe
Case 3:-
When the reservoir is half fill
W1=509021.28kN
W2=1431475.2kN
Water pressure:-
W1=ρgh
=1000x9.81x20m
=196200N/m =196.2kN/m2
Wp1=1/2x20x196.2
=1962kN
Acts on20/3=6.67mts
Uplift pressure:-
At heel
up1=γwxh
=1000x9.81x20
=196.2kN/m
At toe
Up2=γwxh
=1000x9.81x10
=98100N/m
=98.1kN/m
Over turning moment
Stabilizing moment
Mw1=16644995.86kNm
Mw2=29001687.55kNm
Mw1+Mw2=45646683.41
Opposing moment
Mw1’=196200x6.67
=108654kNm
Mup’=257512.5x2026
=521720.25
Mw1’+ Mup’=6525857.25
Factor of safety=4564668.41/6525857.25
=6.9972
Safe
Sliding force:-
Friction
Ff=μn
=0.7(509021.28+1431475.2
=1358347.536 kN
Wp =196200kN
Factor of safety=1358347.536/196200
=6.9 > 1.5
Safe
Tables and Results:-
Case 2
Sl.no force Horizontal force Vertical force
1 Self-weight
M1 509021.28
M2 1431475.2
2 Water pressure W
748400
3 Uplift
pressure, at heel
-396.2
At toe -98.1
4 Silt pressure -180
Table 1
Sl.no force Horizontal force Vertical force
1 Self-weight
M1 509021.28
M2 1431475.2
2 Water pressure W
196200
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
302
3 Uplift
pressure, at heel
-196.2
At toe -98.1
4 Silt pressure -180
Table 2
Results:-
Fig1: Design of Loads case 2
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
303
Fig2: deflection of dam in STAAD pro for case-2
Fig 3: Shear force (SX) for case-2
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
304
Fig 4 SY local for case-2
Fig 5 maximum absolute shear force for case-2
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
305
Fig 6 design of loads for case-3
Fig 7 deflection of dam in STAAD pro for case-3
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
306
Fig 8 max absolute shear force for case-3
Fig 9 major principle stress for case-3
CONCLUSION:
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
307
The behavior of Gravity dam for
stability and response towards seismic forces are
studied in this paper. With problem
consideration, the stability analysis of gravity
dam is done in absence of seismic forces initially.
Thus analysis highlighted that in presence of
various loads like dead load, water/ hydrostatic
pressure, uplift pressure, total cumulative values
of positive moment and negative moment,
summation of horizontal and vertical forces are
overall responsible for dam stability. Further with
analysis it is clear that moment resulting due to
self-weight act as resistive moment against
moment produced due to water, uplift pressure
etc. This means that stability against overturning
is achieved when positive moment is greater than
negative moments. Whereas stability against
sliding depends upon coefficient of friction, sum
of all vertical forces and all horizontal forces.
Thus sliding is governed by uplift pressure.
However, if horizontal force increases stability
against sliding decreases if vertical forces remain
approximately same. Third stability of dam is on
basis of shear friction factor, this depends upon
coefficient of friction, summation of all vertical
forces, summation of all horizontal forces,
geometry of dam and materials shear strength.
For same problem material shear strength,
geometry friction remains unchanged, thus
stability should depend upon sum of all vertical
forces and all horizontal forces. For problem
considered in study, dam achieves stability
against all factors i.e. overturning, sliding &
shearing.
The factor of safety of overturning for load case
of fully fill of reservoir is 2.17 for the manual
calculations it is safe for the dam. The sliding
stability of the concrete gravity dam for fully fill
load case 1.76, which is greater than 1.5, which is
safe for sliding stability. The factor of safety of
overturning for load case of half fill of reservoir
is 4.23 for the manual calculations it is safe for
the dam. The sliding stability of the concrete
gravity dam for half fill 3.58, which is greater
than 1.5, which is safe for sliding stability.
Reference:
1 “Seismic and Stability Analysis of Gravity
Dams Using Staad PRO” by T Subramani,
D.Ponnuvel. in June 2012
2 “Stability Analysis of Concrete Gravity
Dam for Seismic Loading in Afghanistan”
by Mohammad Ejaz Shahir, Priyanka
Dhurvey in June 2017.
3 .”Stability Analysis of Gravity Dam by
Using STAAD Pro in Time History Method”
by S.Sree Sai Swetha in March 2017
4 “Seismic & Stability Analysis of Gravity
Dam” by Miss. Meghna S. Bhalodkar in
2014
5 “Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dam by 3D
Solid Element Modeling using STAAD Pro”
by Jay p. Patel, R. Chhaya in May 2015
6 “Design And Analysis Of Gravity Dam –A
Case Study Analysis Using Staad-Pro” by
mettu Rajesh Reddy, M.Nageswara rao in
2017
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
308
7 “Finite Element Analysis of Concrete
Gravity Dam by Using STAAD-PRO” by
Rampure Aarti Baburao, Mangulkar
Madhuri in 2016
8 Structural Stability And 2D Finite Element
Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dam by
Khalid Dawlatzai, Dr. Manju Dominic
9 Stability analysis of concrete gravity dam on
complicated foundation with multiple slide
planes by Ren Xuhua, Shu Jiaqing, Ben
Nenghui, Ren Hongyun in 2008.
10 Seismic cracking analysis of concrete
gravity dams with initial cracks using the
extended finite element method by Sherong
Zhang, Gaohui Wang, Xiangrong Yu in
2013
11 “Comparison of Design and Analysis of
Concrete Gravity Dam”by Md. Hazrat Ali,
Md. Rabiul Alam in 2011
12 Shake table sliding response of a gravity
dam model including water uplift pressure
by Mathieu Rochon-Cyr, Pierre Léger in
2009
13 Shake table sliding response of a gravity
dam model including water uplift pressure
by Mathieu Rochon Cyr, Pierre Léger in
2013
14 Seismic fracture analysis of concrete gravity
dams including dam–reservoir interaction by
Yusuf Calayir, Muhammet Karaton in 2005
15 Seismic structural stability of concrete
gravity dams considering transient uplift
pressures in cracks by Farrokh Javanmardi,
Pierre Léger, René Tinawi in 2004
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
309
310