SSAM Spring Final Presentation
-
Upload
nick-liffrig -
Category
Documents
-
view
26 -
download
5
Transcript of SSAM Spring Final Presentation
Solid-State Additive Manufacturing
Jordan Boston
Joshua Shaver
Jonnie Weiandt
Ty Helgeson
Donny Donham
David Lindberg
Wayne Gilley
Peter Barber
Nick Liffrig
28 April 2016
Solid-State Project Scope
Create a Functionally Gradient Transition from SAE 4130 to Alloy 690• Model and compare to results from created transition piece
• Analyze hardness across the transition
2
Functionally Gradient Materials• Smooth Transition in properties
• Decreases Carbon Diffusion
• Decrease Intermetallics
• Reduce Residual Stresses from the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion mismatch
Traditional Transition:A to B Instantaneously
Additively Manufactured Transition:A to B Gradually
3
What is Additive Manufacturing?• Process in which you create real objects from 3D model data by
joining materials layer by layer• Traditional manufacturing methods use subtractive manufacturing methods
• Create complex geometries that are impossible to create with traditional manufacturing methods as well as embed sensors during manufacturing
• Able to vary the composition of each layer
4
Two Approaches
Solid-State Welding
• No melting
• No dilution
• High startup cost
Fusion Welding
• Melting and resolidification
• Dilution during welding
• Low startup cost
5
Initial Research
• MIG/TIG Brazing
• High frequency induction welding
• Ultrasonic welding
• Friction Stir Welding (FSW)• Consumable tool
• Powder feed system
• Sandwich configuration
Sandwich configuration
6
Consumable Tool
• Proof of concept • Aluminum surfacing
• Brass surfacing
• What We Learned• Determined process was not desirable to pursue for steel
7
POWDER FEED SYSTEM
8
POWDER FEED SYSTEM
• Commercial Powder Feeders
9
Sandwich configuration
Sandwich Configuration - 5 Step1. Determine FSW tool geometry
2. Verify the model with the thermal camera
3. Optimize parameters for each layera) Open air welds
b) Submerged welds
4. Create final weld
5. Conduct testing on final welda) Examine microstructure
b) Survey hardness
10
1. Tool Geometry
• Tungsten Rhenium Tool• Expensive
• Very Brittle
• Difficult to machine
• Tapered Cylindrical Geometry
• 5.6mm Pin Length
11
Tapered Cylindrical
2. Verify Model
• Model – 1150°C
• Actual – 1100°C
°C
12
3. Optimize Parameters – FSW In Air • Initial Parameters
• Spindle Speed – 1,015 RPM
• Travel Speed – 4.04 ipm
• Downforce – 1,000lbs
• Tool Angle – 0°
2 Layers of 410
13
3. Optimize Parameters – FSW In Air• Final Parameters
• Spindle Speed – 815 RPM
• Travel Speed – 2.96 ipm
• Downforce – ~6,000lbs
• Tool Angle – 2°
14
Layer of 410
Layers of 304
FSW Underwater• Came across this process while researching shielding
Benefits:
• Extend tool life
• Water acts as shielding for the weld
• Increases the mechanical properties of the weld
15
Underwater Test Welds
FSW In Air
16
3. Optimize Parameters – FSW Underwater
• Initial Parameters• Spindle Speed – 815 RPM
• Travel Speed – 2.96 in/min
• Downforce –6,000lbs
• Tool Angle – 2°
• Cold Water – 25°C
2 Layers of 304
17
3. Optimize Parameters – FSW Underwater• Final Parameters
• Spindle Speed – 428RPM & 815RPM for the last layer
• Travel Speed – 2.96in/min
• Downforce – varied with each layer of the sandwich
• Tool Angle – 2°
• Hot Water – 50°C
18
4. Final Weld • 4130 to 410
• Downforce – 7,500lbs
4130 at 50x 410 at 200xFinal Weld Macro
4130
410
304
310
690
19
4. Final Weld • 310 to 690
• Downforce – 9,000lbs
690 at 500x 690 at 200xFinal Weld Macro
4130
410
304
310
690
20
Modeling Diffusion
21
• Functionally Graded Transition between 4130 and 690
• Temp = 1000°C
• Time = 24 hrs
22
Modeling Diffusion
• 5-Step transition between 4130 and 690
• Temp = 1000°C
• Time = 24 hrs
23
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Har
dn
ess
(HV
10
)Hardness
Hardness (Solid State) Linear (Hardness (Solid State))
4130
410
304
310
690
Compare to Fusion Welding Team
• Time Required
• Hardness Values
• Scalability
• Geometry
24
Conclusions & Future Work
• A successful sandwich transition was created
• Verify the Carbon Diffusion Model
• Further research on Underwater FSW should be looked into
25
Donors
26
Questions?
27
Solid-State Additive Manufacturing
Jordan Boston
Joshua Shaver
Jonnie Weiandt
Ty Helgeson
Donny Donham
David Lindberg
Wayne Gilley
Peter Barber
Nick Liffrig
Backup Slides
29
POWDER FEED SYSTEM
30
4. Final Weld • 410 to 304
• Downforce – 8,500lbs
410 (pin) at 500x 304 (pin) at 50xFinal Weld Macro
4130
410
304
310
690
31
4. Final Weld • 304 to 310
• Downforce – 9,000lbs
310 (pin) at 500x 310 (far right of pin) at 200xFinal Weld Macro
4130
410
304
310
690
32
33