SSAM Spring Final Presentation

33
Solid-State Additive Manufacturing Jordan Boston Joshua Shaver Jonnie Weiandt Ty Helgeson Donny Donham David Lindberg Wayne Gilley Peter Barber Nick Liffrig 28 April 2016

Transcript of SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Page 1: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Solid-State Additive Manufacturing

Jordan Boston

Joshua Shaver

Jonnie Weiandt

Ty Helgeson

Donny Donham

David Lindberg

Wayne Gilley

Peter Barber

Nick Liffrig

28 April 2016

Page 2: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Solid-State Project Scope

Create a Functionally Gradient Transition from SAE 4130 to Alloy 690• Model and compare to results from created transition piece

• Analyze hardness across the transition

2

Page 3: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Functionally Gradient Materials• Smooth Transition in properties

• Decreases Carbon Diffusion

• Decrease Intermetallics

• Reduce Residual Stresses from the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion mismatch

Traditional Transition:A to B Instantaneously

Additively Manufactured Transition:A to B Gradually

3

Page 4: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

What is Additive Manufacturing?• Process in which you create real objects from 3D model data by

joining materials layer by layer• Traditional manufacturing methods use subtractive manufacturing methods

• Create complex geometries that are impossible to create with traditional manufacturing methods as well as embed sensors during manufacturing

• Able to vary the composition of each layer

4

Page 5: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Two Approaches

Solid-State Welding

• No melting

• No dilution

• High startup cost

Fusion Welding

• Melting and resolidification

• Dilution during welding

• Low startup cost

5

Page 6: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Initial Research

• MIG/TIG Brazing

• High frequency induction welding

• Ultrasonic welding

• Friction Stir Welding (FSW)• Consumable tool

• Powder feed system

• Sandwich configuration

Sandwich configuration

6

Page 7: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Consumable Tool

• Proof of concept • Aluminum surfacing

• Brass surfacing

• What We Learned• Determined process was not desirable to pursue for steel

7

Page 8: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

POWDER FEED SYSTEM

8

Page 9: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

POWDER FEED SYSTEM

• Commercial Powder Feeders

9

Page 10: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Sandwich configuration

Sandwich Configuration - 5 Step1. Determine FSW tool geometry

2. Verify the model with the thermal camera

3. Optimize parameters for each layera) Open air welds

b) Submerged welds

4. Create final weld

5. Conduct testing on final welda) Examine microstructure

b) Survey hardness

10

Page 11: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

1. Tool Geometry

• Tungsten Rhenium Tool• Expensive

• Very Brittle

• Difficult to machine

• Tapered Cylindrical Geometry

• 5.6mm Pin Length

11

Tapered Cylindrical

Page 12: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

2. Verify Model

• Model – 1150°C

• Actual – 1100°C

°C

12

Page 13: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

3. Optimize Parameters – FSW In Air • Initial Parameters

• Spindle Speed – 1,015 RPM

• Travel Speed – 4.04 ipm

• Downforce – 1,000lbs

• Tool Angle – 0°

2 Layers of 410

13

Page 14: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

3. Optimize Parameters – FSW In Air• Final Parameters

• Spindle Speed – 815 RPM

• Travel Speed – 2.96 ipm

• Downforce – ~6,000lbs

• Tool Angle – 2°

14

Layer of 410

Layers of 304

Page 15: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

FSW Underwater• Came across this process while researching shielding

Benefits:

• Extend tool life

• Water acts as shielding for the weld

• Increases the mechanical properties of the weld

15

Page 16: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Underwater Test Welds

FSW In Air

16

Page 17: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

3. Optimize Parameters – FSW Underwater

• Initial Parameters• Spindle Speed – 815 RPM

• Travel Speed – 2.96 in/min

• Downforce –6,000lbs

• Tool Angle – 2°

• Cold Water – 25°C

2 Layers of 304

17

Page 18: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

3. Optimize Parameters – FSW Underwater• Final Parameters

• Spindle Speed – 428RPM & 815RPM for the last layer

• Travel Speed – 2.96in/min

• Downforce – varied with each layer of the sandwich

• Tool Angle – 2°

• Hot Water – 50°C

18

Page 19: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

4. Final Weld • 4130 to 410

• Downforce – 7,500lbs

4130 at 50x 410 at 200xFinal Weld Macro

4130

410

304

310

690

19

Page 20: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

4. Final Weld • 310 to 690

• Downforce – 9,000lbs

690 at 500x 690 at 200xFinal Weld Macro

4130

410

304

310

690

20

Page 21: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Modeling Diffusion

21

• Functionally Graded Transition between 4130 and 690

• Temp = 1000°C

• Time = 24 hrs

Page 22: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

22

Modeling Diffusion

• 5-Step transition between 4130 and 690

• Temp = 1000°C

• Time = 24 hrs

Page 23: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

23

150

175

200

225

250

275

300

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

Har

dn

ess

(HV

10

)Hardness

Hardness (Solid State) Linear (Hardness (Solid State))

4130

410

304

310

690

Page 24: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Compare to Fusion Welding Team

• Time Required

• Hardness Values

• Scalability

• Geometry

24

Page 25: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Conclusions & Future Work

• A successful sandwich transition was created

• Verify the Carbon Diffusion Model

• Further research on Underwater FSW should be looked into

25

Page 26: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Donors

26

Page 27: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Questions?

27

Page 28: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Solid-State Additive Manufacturing

Jordan Boston

Joshua Shaver

Jonnie Weiandt

Ty Helgeson

Donny Donham

David Lindberg

Wayne Gilley

Peter Barber

Nick Liffrig

Page 29: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

Backup Slides

29

Page 30: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

POWDER FEED SYSTEM

30

Page 31: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

4. Final Weld • 410 to 304

• Downforce – 8,500lbs

410 (pin) at 500x 304 (pin) at 50xFinal Weld Macro

4130

410

304

310

690

31

Page 32: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

4. Final Weld • 304 to 310

• Downforce – 9,000lbs

310 (pin) at 500x 310 (far right of pin) at 200xFinal Weld Macro

4130

410

304

310

690

32

Page 33: SSAM Spring Final Presentation

33