SROI Results

64
1 HDR Inc. August 8, 2012 Holland Board of Public Works Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI) Analysis Results Power for the 21 st Century

Transcript of SROI Results

Page 1: SROI Results

1  

HDR Inc. August 8, 2012

Holland Board of Public Works

Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI) Analysis Results

Power for the 21st Century

Page 2: SROI Results

2  

Agenda

•  Introduction

•  Electric Generation Resource Options & Scenario Overview

•  SROI Overview

•  SROI Results

Page 3: SROI Results

3  

Holland Board of Public Works

Electric Generation Resource Options & Scenario Overview

James R. Connell P.E. Sr. Vice President Director of Power, HDR Engineering, Inc.

Power for the 21st Century

Page 4: SROI Results

4  

• New  Genera.on  Op.ons  Analysis a.   Conceptual  designs  of  electric  genera.on  op.ons b.   Calcula.on  of  thermodynamic  and  emissions  performance c.   Es.mated  Capital  and  Fixed  &  Variable  O&M  costs  d.   Inputs  to  Ventyx  Strategist  Model  e.   Defined  Electric  Resource  Scenarios  (CEP+)  

• Ventyx  Integrated  Resource  Planning  &  Produc.on  Cost  model    a.  HBPW  Electric  Load  Forecast    b.  Ventyx  Reference  Case  for  25  year  Energy  Cost  Forecasts      c.  Electric  Resource  Scenario  Strategist  Runs    d.  Sensi.vity  Runs  –  High/Low  Natural  Gas  Cost  Forecasts  

• HDR  Decision  Economics  Analysis a. Financial  Return  On  Investment  (FROI)    b.  Sustainable  Return  On  Investment  (SROI)

Work  Flow:  

Page 5: SROI Results

5  

James De Young Station

• Unit 3 Retired in all cases • Snowmelt system currently fed by U3/U4 •  46 MW Combined Capacity U4+U5 • No Capital Investment – Retire U4 &U5 by 2016 per the CEP • Invest $28M Air Pollution Control Equipment , U4 Retires 2027, U5 Retires 2033 (Base Case)

Page 6: SROI Results

6  

Renewable Generation Options

20MW Wind Farm 8MW Solar Photovoltaic

22MW Biomass Conversion JDY - U5

4MW Digester Gas CHP

Page 7: SROI Results

7  

New Solid Fueled Unit 10 at JDY

70 MW Capacity • 50% Petroleum Coke • 30% Biomass • 20% PRB Coal

Page 8: SROI Results

8  

Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle

2x1 LM2500 - 78MW 2x1 LM6000 – 114MW

Page 9: SROI Results

9  

Natural Gas Fired Combined Heat and Power (CHP)

LM2500 CHP – 30.5MW

Page 10: SROI Results

10  

Page 11: SROI Results

11  

Page 12: SROI Results

12  

Page 13: SROI Results

13  

Page 14: SROI Results

14  

Page 15: SROI Results

15  

Page 16: SROI Results

16  

Page 17: SROI Results

17  

Page 18: SROI Results

18  

Ventyx

Page 19: SROI Results

19  

Ventyx Dispatch Model •  HBPW engaged Ventyx to conduct operational modeling •  Ventyx’s model considers the available resources in

each scenario and forecasts how the resources would be dispatched based on economic variables internal and external to HBPW

•  The Ventyx forecasts feed directly into the SROI model

SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 20: SROI Results

20  

Ventyx Dispatch Model •  Ventyx also provides forecasts of external energy

market conditions •  Some of these forecasts were also used directly in the

SROI model

SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 21: SROI Results

21  

Questions?

Page 22: SROI Results

22  

SROI Overview

Dennis Bruce & Andrew Luison HDR Engineering Inc.

Page 23: SROI Results

23  

Traditional Business Case Analysis

SROI Overview

Life-­‐Cycle  Cost  Analysis  involves  the  analysis  of  the  costs  of  a  system  or  a  component  over  its  en6re  life  span  

Financial  Analysis  involves  evalua6on  of  cash  flow  impacts  to  determine  investment  suitability  

Tradi6onal  models  o>en  fall  short:  

  Only  consider  cash  impacts  

  Do  not  account  for  uncertainty    Lack  transparency  

Page 24: SROI Results

24  

What is SROI? Triple  Boaom  Line  Decision  Making  Framework  

It’s  best  prac6ce  in  Cost-­‐Benefit  Analysis  and  Financial  Analysis  over  a  project’s  en6re  life-­‐cycle,  augmented  by:  

 Accoun.ng  for  uncertainty  using  state-­‐of-­‐the-­‐art  risk  analysis  techniques   Engaging  stakeholders  directly  to  generate  consensus  and  transparency  

Page 25: SROI Results

25  

The Triple-Bottom Line Framework

SROI Overview

SROI  adds  to  tradi6onal  financial  analysis  the  mone6zed  value  of  non-­‐cash  benefits  and  externali6es  

Page 26: SROI Results

26  

SROI Methodology

SROI Overview

A  Four-­‐Step  Process  

“SROI reveals the hidden value in projects.” David Lewis, PhD

Former Principal Economist at the US Congressional Budget Office Author “Policy and Planning as a Public Choice: Mass Transit in the United States”

Page 27: SROI Results

27  

Today: End of Step 4

SROI Overview

Run  the  Model  and  Produce  Results  

Page 28: SROI Results

28  

S-Curve Diagram

SROI Overview

Page 29: SROI Results

29  

SROI Outcomes ($NPV): Changing Decision Making Processes

SROI Overview

Technology  X  Technology  Y  (Tech  X  plus  Renewable)  

Tradi.onal  (FROI)   $188   $126  

Environmental  and  Community  Impacts  

$234   $337  

Total  Impact  (SROI)   $422   $463  

•  “X” would be selected from a fiscal perspective •  “Y” is the best option on a balanced SROI basis

–  $62M investment, yields >$100 in environmental benefits

Page 30: SROI Results

30  

SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 31: SROI Results

31  

SROI Process for P21 •  2 RAP sessions with stakeholders from HBPW, the

Holland community, and HDR – Potential project costs and benefits identified – Preliminary and refined values discussed

•  Additional research and interviews to refine assumptions and inputs

•  Several refinements of technology options and costing inputs

•  Development of SROI model •  Development of metrics and output reports •  Discussion of results (today) •  Impacts are incremental:

–  relative to the “base case” SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 32: SROI Results

32  

Benefit & Cost Categories

Page 33: SROI Results

33  

Benefit and Cost Impacts •  A range of impacts were identified by stakeholder

group or “account”

•  Key stakeholder accounts: –  Holland BPW –  Electricity User –  Environmental –  Economy –  Community

•  Some impacts are transfers –  Quantified by account –  But cancel out in NPV calculation

SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 34: SROI Results

34  Benefits & Cost Categories

Holland BPW Account

•  Capital, EPC, O&M, Fuel, and Fixed Costs

•  Retail Electricity Sales •  Interchange Purchases & Sales •  District Heating Costs &

Recovery •  Snowmelt Costs & Recovery •  Retired JDY Value •  Reduced Biosolids Treatment

Cost •  Capacity Purchases & Sales •  Renewable Energy Credit

Purchases & Sales •  Site Remediation Cost

Page 35: SROI Results

35  Benefits & Cost Categories

Electricity User Account

•  Savings Due to District Heating

•  Electricity Service Cost

Page 36: SROI Results

36  Benefits & Cost Categories

Environmental Account

•  Criteria Air Contaminant Emissions

•  Greenhouse Gas Emissions

•  Additional Emission Savings Due to District Heating

Page 37: SROI Results

37  Benefits & Cost Categories

Economic Activity Account

•  Business Relocation Benefit

•  Reduced Biomass Shipping Costs

Page 38: SROI Results

38  Benefits & Cost Categories

Community Account

•  General Fund Transfer from HBPW

•  Loss of Commercial Harbor Status

•  Social Value of Parkland

•  Landfilling of Tires

•  Retired James De Young Land Value

•  Snowmelt Service Cost

Page 39: SROI Results

39  

Results & Outcomes

Page 40: SROI Results

40  

High-Level Outcomes:

Results & Conclusions

•  All but one scenario provides a positive SROI relative to the base case

•  Impacts span all stakeholder accounts •  Two individual impacts dominate the overall results:

–  Value of electricity service cost reduction –  Value of emissions reductions

•  The 3 scenarios with natural gas (e.g., A, B, G) provide the highest SROI –  The largest benefit is reduced emissions –  Electricity cost reductions significant too (>$100M)

Page 41: SROI Results

41  

High-Level Outcomes (cont’d):

Results & Conclusions

•  The scenario providing the greatest incremental value (at the mean) from both an FROI and SROI perspective relative to the base case is Scenario G –  FROI ~$250M –  SROI ~$575M

•  Range from about $300M to $800M •  Range includes low, medium and high gas price

•  Scenario G: –  reduces both electricity costs and emissions –  Increases Holland’s competiveness –  Provides district heating and snowmelt benefits

Page 42: SROI Results

42  

Financial Return on Investment ($M)

Results & Conclusions

Page 43: SROI Results

43  

Non-Financial Return on Investment ($M)

Results & Conclusions

Page 44: SROI Results

44  

Sustainable Return on Investment ($M)

Results & Conclusions

Page 45: SROI Results

45  

Sustainable Return on Investment ($M)

Results & Conclusions

Page 46: SROI Results

46  

Contributions to NPV by Scenario

Results & Conclusions

Page 47: SROI Results

47  

Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI)

Results & Conclusions

Page 48: SROI Results

48  

Levelized Cost of Electricity

Results & Conclusions

Page 49: SROI Results

49  

Scenario Summaries

Page 50: SROI Results

50  

♦ JDY Units 4 and 5 continue to operate, each with a new bag house with DSI (for SO2 mitigation) and an SNCR system (for NOx mitigation)

♦ Circulating fluidized bed boiler and steam turbine facility beginning operation in 2017 and located at the existing JDY site

BASE CASE

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 51: SROI Results

51  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016

♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2015 and located at or near the Industrial Park

♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined cycle facility beginning operation in 2015 and located at the existing JDY site

SCENARIO A

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 52: SROI Results

52  

SCENARIO A

Emission Savings

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions) Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Page 53: SROI Results

53  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016 ♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2015 and located at or near the Industrial Park ♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined cycle facility beginning operation in 2015 and located at the existing JDY site ♦ JDY Unit 5 retrofitted to burn woody biomass in 2018 ♦ 8 MW of solar capacity beginning operation in 2030 ♦ 20 MW of wind capacity beginning operation in 2016 ♦ Digester gas combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2014, and located at the existing JDY site or the wastewater treatment facility

SCENARIO B

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 54: SROI Results

54  

SCENARIO B

Emission Savings

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions) Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Page 55: SROI Results

55  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016 ♦ Circulating fluidized bed boiler and steam turbine facility beginning operation in 2017 and located at the existing JDY site ♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2015 and located at or near the Industrial Park ♦ 8 MW of solar capacity beginning operation in 2030 ♦ 20 MW of wind capacity beginning operation in 2016

♦ Digester gas combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2014, and located at the existing JDY site or the wastewater treatment facility in 2014

SCENARIO C

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 56: SROI Results

56  

SCENARIO C

Emission Savings

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions) Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Page 57: SROI Results

57  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016

♦ Circulating fluidized bed boiler and steam turbine facility beginning operation in 2017 and located at the existing JDY site

♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2015 and located at or near the Industrial Park

SCENARIO D

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 58: SROI Results

58  

SCENARIO D

Emission Savings

Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions)

Page 59: SROI Results

59  

♦ JDY Units 4 and 5 continue to operate, each with a new bag house with DSI (for SO2 mitigation) and an SNCR system (for NOx mitigation) Y Units 4 and 5 continue to operate with new bag house, DSI system, and SNCR system

♦ Increased electricity demand satisfied by market purchases

SCENARIO E

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 60: SROI Results

60  

SCENARIO E

Emission Savings

Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions)

Page 61: SROI Results

61  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016

♦ Increased electricity demand satisfied by market purchases

SCENARIO F

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 62: SROI Results

62  

SCENARIO F

Emission Savings

Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions)

Page 63: SROI Results

63  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016

♦ Gas turbine (LM6000) combined cycle facility beginning operation in 2015 and located adjacent to the existing JDY site

SCENARIO G

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 64: SROI Results

64  

SCENARIO G

Emission Savings

Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions)