SPU #7
-
Upload
d-todd-smith -
Category
Documents
-
view
177 -
download
3
Transcript of SPU #7
Appellate Practice & Procedure
Class #7:
Rehearing and Higher Court Review
presented by
D. Todd Smithhttp://texasappellatelawblog.com
for
Solo Practice University™
Introduction
You have received a decision from the appellate court.
It goes your way—or not—and you have notified the
client of the basic outcome
What are the next steps?
What factors should you consider in advising your client
what, if anything, to do next?
Next Steps for Losing Party
Do nothing and let the decision become final
Motion for rehearing (or reconsideration)
Seek higher court review:•State supreme court or equivalent
•U.S. Supreme Court
Next Steps for Winning Party
Wait and see what the losing party does
Consider responding to whatever the losing party files,
wherever they file it
Motion for Rehearing
Why bring one?•To correct problems with the appellate court’s opinion or judgment
•To try and change the result
•Possibly to preserve error for higher court review
•For en banc, grounds usually must involve a need for uniformity in decisions
(the deciding court’s and others)
Don’t simply rehash old arguments
Downsides:•At least some additional cost to the client, depending on fee arrangement
•Could delay conclusion significantly
Opposing a Motion for Rehearing
Sometimes the right response is no response•When local practice is that court will request a response if desired
•Avoids unnecessary expense
As appropriate, point out that the motion raises nothing
the court of appeals hasn’t seen (and rejected) before
Make arguments in opposition to the movant’s
Higher Court Review?
What are the chances review will be accepted?•Look at any available statistics
•Consider recent trends
•Other cases pending with similar issues?
From the higher court’s perspective:•Discretionary review versus review as a matter of right
•Is there a dissenting opinion?
•Do the lower courts’ opinions conflict?
•Statutory construction
•Importance of the issue
•Error correction
Higher Court Review?
Additional costs•By this point, client has already been through a full-blown appeal
•Does it make sense to go on?
•If client loses, potential for additional post-judgment interest and (if awarded)
appellate attorneys’ fees
Even if successful, resolution can take years
Basic Strategy for Petitioner
As petitioner, can you make a good case for review?
If you can, in light of the considerations outlined above,
your chances are increased
But always ask whether moving forward is in the client’s
best interest
Economics usually the biggest consideration
Basic Strategy for Respondent
If discretionary, show why the court should pass:•The lower court got it right
•The case really isn’t important to anyone but the parties
•The court of appeals’ decision is limited to its facts
•There is no real conflict among the lower courts
•The higher court isn’t in the business of error correction
Otherwise, much the same strategy as an appellee
Appellate Practice & Procedure
Class #8:
Tips and Strategies for Marketing an
Appellate Practice
presented by
D. Todd Smithhttp://texasappellatelawblog.com
for
Solo Practice University™