SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

26
SPSR STUDENT PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Preventing what we cannot cure Student Medical Advocacy Toolkit A training guide for future health professionals NATASHA GHENT-RODRIGUEZ NEETHU PUTTA JESSIE DUVALL TOVA FULLER, PH.D.

description

This is the SPSR advocacy toolkit, built to help students grow into successful medical advocates.

Transcript of SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 1: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

SPSR

STUDENT PHYSICIANSFOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Preventing what we cannot cure

Student Medical Advocacy Toolkit

A training guide for future health professionals

NATASHA GHENT-RODRIGUEZ

NEETHU PUTTA

JESSIE DUVALL

TOVA FULLER, PH.D.

Page 2: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3

Part I: Mission & Vision 4

Strategic Priorities 5

Part II: What is Advocacy? 7 Medical Advocacy 8

Part III: Building Your Chapter 9

Step 1: Getting Started Step 2: Organization & Structure Step 3: Resources Step 4: Building rapport Overall Goals

9 10 11 11 12

Part IV: Advocacy Strategies 13

Strategy 1: Reaching Congress Strategy 2: Reaching the media Strategy 3: Hosting events Strategy 4: Building partnerships

13 15 17 19

Appendix 20

Citations 25

Page 3: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 2

"Physicians have an obligation to consider the entire public as their patient. Even without prior activist experience, medical students can make a huge difference in their own community through student groups, while building the skills necessary to tackle threats from government legislation. SPSR is a great starting point for those who have the desire to create change."

Marie Kim, President of SPSR University of Iowa Chapter

ence. As health professional students, you are fortunate to have each other. Your energy and fresh ideas are an inspiration for the rest of us. Thank you so much for embarking on this journey with

Dr. Peter Wilk, Executive Director PSR

Page 4: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 3

 

 

 

 

 

Acknowledgements  We   would   like   to   thank   the   following  individuals   for   their   continued   support:  Marie   Kim   for   her   helpful   edits,   Craig  Levoy  for  his  diligent,  prompt  work  ethic,  and  Molly   Rauch   and  Rebecca  Abelman  for  their  revisions  and  advice.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 5: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 4 Part I: Mission & Vision

                       

Part  I:  Mission  &  Vision    

Who  are  we?   Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), founded in 1961, is the medical and public health voice working to prevent the use or spread of nuclear weapons and to slow, stop and reverse global warming and thetoxic degradation of the environment. PSR is the U.S. Affiliate of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), the recipient of the

clinic a physician must be concerned about the greater good of mankind. As a health professional, your work extends beyond the hospital or clinic you are an advocate for implementing and changing policies to protect the rest of the population. PSR has over 50,000 members and 31 PSR chapters, all committed to the same mission. You are a part of PSR! Student Physicians for Social Responsibility (SPSR) is a program of PSR

SPSR has 41 chapters and is headed by two national student representatives who both sit on the Board of Directors for PSR and guide SPSR as a whole.

SPSR MISSION:

Student Physicians for Social Responsibility is a group of student health professionals working to promote

environmental justice, address social disparities, and advocate for a peaceful and secure world.

Page 6: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 5 Part I: Mission & Vision

SPSR has three different focus areas:    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These focus areas each have a few or goals that drive the overall mission. Social Justice Fairness for all Guided by the values and expertise of medicine and public health, PSR seeks to protect human life worldwide from the impact of social injustice and structural violence. The root causes of social injustice are many and include a widening gap between rich and poor, unequal distribution of resources worldwide, discrimination, and the disenfranchisement of individuals and groups from the political process. SPSR is committed to highlighting the disproportionate negative effects that issues like environmental degradation, war, and nuclear waste have on poorer communities of color both nationally and internationally. Equal Access to Healthcare Whether it is through promoting legislature for equal access to healthcare or providing the homeless with healthcare services, student PSR chapters support universal access to basic health services.

SPSR

Social Justice

Environmental Justice

Peace & Security

Page 7: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 6 Part I: Mission & Vision

Environmental Justice Individual and community health are intrinsically linked to the environment; in order to improve our own health, we must develop a more sustainable relationship with the environment. Environmental degradations such as the use of environmental toxins and consequences related to climate change disproportionately affect the poorest communities and communities of color. Student PSR aims to raise awareness of the health effects of environmental destruction and their effect on communities, and to act in support of a verdant and just world. Through education and advocacy, SPSR addresses a wide range of issues such as climate change, toxins, clean energy, and greening healthcare at the local, national, and international level. Peace & Security Supporting a nonviolent and fair world War threatens the health and livelihood of military personnel and civilians alike. Modern warfare takes a direct toll on the physical and mental health of those involved. Furthermore, war is expensive, leading to the diversion of considerable amounts of resources from worthy endeavors including healthcare and education. Student PSR recognizes that peace is the precursor to a better world, and supports the promotion of a truly secure global environment. Nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament Nuclear weapons pose the single greatest security threat to our global existence. The use of a nuclear weapon would completely overwhelm the public health infrastructure, rendering any current strategies ineffectual. In facing the nuclear threat, SPSR's motto is especially relevant: we must prevent what we cannot cure. SPSR seeks to minimize this danger through global disarmament and by lobbying for steps toward zero nuclear weapons. Safe Energy SPSR is committed to promoting research of and use of alternative energy sources. Coal-fired power plants are not only the leading climate change culprit in the US,

been linked to cardiovascular and respiratory compromise. Nuclear energy is economically unsound and mired in unresolved safety issues that pose a threat to public health. SPSR advocates for focusing on real energy solutions from renewable, efficient sources.

Page 6

Page 8: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 7 Part II: What is advocacy?

Step  2:  Organization  &  Structure  

There must be a hierarchy within your SPSR chapter in order to successfully propel your ship forward. Here is an example:

Knowing who is responsible for what tasks in your chapter will help ensure and improve the efficiency of your advocacy work. Also, by giving your core leaders titles and specific responsibilities it will help maintain the stability of your chapter. Draw your own structure and list the main responsibilities of each position:

Step  2:  Organization  &  Structure  

Part  II:  What  is  advocacy?    

Guru: Now let me teach you the ways of ad-vocacy, young one!

Four Step Problem Solving Process:

1) Identifying problems 2) Finding solutions 3) Planning advocacy strategies 4) Finding the common ground between those three steps

Advocacy

Identifying Problems

Finding Solutions

Changes in policies & programs

be. We must identify problems, find so-lutions, and plan advocacy strategies, and ultimately create change in policies and programs.

Advocacy is not just identifying problems or solutions. While identifying problems and finding solutions are both integral parts to the process, advocacy is an independent action dedicated to changing policies, positions or programs of an institution.1 Advo-cacy is only one part of a four step problem solving process, as illustrated below.

Page 9: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Part II: What is advocacy?

What is medical advocacy? Medical advocacy aims to change policies that are relevant to medicine. Student Physicians for Social Responsibility (SPSR) concentrates on three sectors: Environment & Health, Peace and Security, and Social Justice. For example, nuclear disarmament is a medical issue, as nuclear weapons can potentially cause many health-endangering consequences, such as radioactive contamination. SPSR advocates for complete nuclear disarmament. You are a SPSR medical advocate! Most SPSR groups choose a few issues that they are passionate about and focus on

in at least one of its main program areas Peace & Security, Environment & Health, and Social Justice. Communicate your ideas with your National Student Representatives (NSR). You can also focus on other areas of interest; for example, Philadelphia SPSR groups mainly focus on gun violence. Which issues will your SPSR chapter focus on? Plan in the box below:

E-mail [email protected].

Page 8

Dr. Peter Wilk, Executive Director PSR

Page 10: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 9 Part III: Building Your Chapter

Part  III:  Building  Your  Chapter    

what medical advocacy is, you are ready to build your own SPSR chapter! In order to construct a united front to advocate for a change in a specific policy, you must have a cohesive, organized and strong group of energized advocates. This section provides helpful advice for building a successful SPSR chapter.

Step  1:  Getting  Started  

1) Register as an SPSR advocate on the PSR website: http://www.psr.org/chapters/student-chapters/join-student-psr.html

2) Contact PSR National at [email protected] and your local PSR

chapter. Find your local PSR chapter: http://www.psr.org/chapters/ 3) Identify three to four core helpers who are interested in starting this

SPSR chapter with you. 4) Hold a kick-off event. See below and Part IV: Advocacy Strategies for

details on holding events. 5) Make a plan or start an initiative, and then request a mini-grant from PSR

National. Ex. Design a campaign that asks Congress to get rid of environmental toxins. Write up a concise, yet well explained grant request for this campaign.  

Page 11: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Part III: Building Your Chapter

Step  2:  Organization  &  Structure    There must be a hierarchy within your SPSR chapter in order to successfully propel your organization forward.

 

     

     

Knowing who is responsible for each task in your chapter will improve the efficiency of your advocacy work. Also, giving your core leaders titles and specific responsibilities will maintain the stability of your chapter. Draw your own structure and list the main responsibilities of each position:

President

Vice President Secretary Treasurer

Page 10

Page 12: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 11 Part III: Building Your Chapter

Step  3:  Resources   You will need some help building your chapter or organization.

1) Knowledge of school assistance: What does your school offer to

student groups? Make sure to ask! Sometimes student groups are provided free office space, conference reimbursements, free poster printings, etc.

2) Email [email protected]: This e-mail address is for any questions or

initiatives. 3) Contact your local PSR chapter: Use the PSR website (http://

www.psr.org/chapters/) to find your local PSR chapter. Perhaps you can hold a joint event or share some of their resources.

 

Step  4:  Building  rapport  within  your  chapter   This step is essential to building a strong, cohesive chapter.

1) Use a social media network, such as Facebook, to create a group or

fan page. You can have members post relevant articles or thoughts on that page, creating a living space for your group!

2) wiki.

time. Some wikis are moderated, meaning someone reviews the changes before they are made. A wiki can be a useful tool for information sharing. Visit www.wiki.com to read more and create one today!

3) Create an e-mail listserv to facilitate shared communication by using a

Yahoo or Google group. This allows you to send an e-mail to all members by just e-mailing one Yahoo or Google group address.

Page 13: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Where we need to be

Overall  goals  for  your  chapter:   How do you gauge the success of your chapter? This is what every chapter should strive for:

1) Events: Events are essential to maintaining a successful chapter. They are what attracts members and keeps members, as events tend to be both informative and fun and students love free food! Successful chapters should be hosting at least two large events as well as three fundraisers per year.

2) Funds: PSR offers mini grants for SPSR chapters for specific initiatives

that an SPSR chapter is launching. For example, if an SPSR chapter launches a campaign on environmental health and sends an advocacy plan to PSR National, PSR consider sending a grant to that chapter. Furthermore, try to keep a target amount of around $500 to hold events and for meetings.

3) Members: There is power in numbers: members may have useful

contacts, draw attention and thus generate more members, and give your SPSR chapter credibility. Extending invitations to public health, pre-medical and dental students helps increase awareness, resources, and funds, and as an added benefit, you may gain potential members! Aim for a core group of 20-25 dedicated members.

Part III: Building Your Chapter Page 12

Page 14: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 13 Part IV: Advocacy Strategies

Part  IV:  Advocacy  Strategies How do you implement your advocacy agenda? Detailed below are some strategies that you and your SPSR chapter can use in order to be successful advocates.

Strategy  #1:  Reaching  Congress  

One of the most important aspects of advocacy is meeting with those who impact policy. These meetings are used to persuade lawmakers to take a course of action that you support. This is called lobbying. Your congresspersons are there to represent the views of their constituentsexpect to be contacts and need to be contacted in order to perform their duty well. Elected officials and their staff regularly meet with constituents to hear their views, though the majority of visitors are paid lobbyists representing industry and corporations. The corporate interest is not always

it is critical to counterbalance those voices with opinions of concerned citizens like YOU!

Tactics:  

1) , either in your district or in Washington, is the most effective lobbying strategy. This way, one gains face-to-face contact and can build rapport with the congressperson. First, call and make an appointment with your member of congress. If you cannot get an appointment, ask to meet with the staff person that is most qualified to talk about the issue in which you are concerned.

2) Before the meeting:

Gather an interested group of people to show that this issue affects more than one person. Establish your agenda and goals.

Lobbying is the action of attempting to influence a

especially in terms of voting.

Page 15: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

3) During the meeting:

Be concise and to the point, as you have to remember that your member of congress does have a busy schedule. Press for commitment; do not let your member of congress evade the issue. Ask specifically for his or her position on the issue. Stress why this issue concerns you and others. Cite local statistics and give examples of those who will be most affected.

4) After the meeting:

Make sure to thank the member or the staff person for his or her time. Provide a follow-up e-mail or fact sheet, or perhaps schedule a second meeting. Keep in touch, so you can eventually build a relationship. Share the knowledge you learned

and tell the PSR national office.

Best  Practices  

Prepare a convincing argument.

Explain the problem, and then explain your solution thoroughly.

Pick a few throw too many at them!

Explain why it is important for the community.

Bring a business card or contact information with you.

Bring PSR resources or fact sheets if relevant.

Part IV: Advocacy Strategies Page 14

Page 16: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Strategy  #2:  Reaching  the  media  

The media is influential in educating the public and shaping public policies. If you want Congress to pass clean air legislation or ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, you have to keep those issues in the public eye. As a SPSR advocateheard above voices of the high-priced lobbyists for the coal and oil industries, military contractors, or pro-gun lobbyists.

Tactics:  

 

   

 

2. Letter to the editor These are among the most popular and widely read

parts of every daily newspaper. Most importantly, elected officials carefully monitor this section of the newspaper along with the editorial page to discern local opinion. (For example, see Appendix C.)

3. Ask local media sources to come cover your events By covering your

events, you will be keeping the public informed and keep SPSR issues in the spotlight. This will attract attention from the public, other advocates, and elected officials.

Format One page at maximum with a brief headline Print "MEDIA ADVISORY" in the top left corner Provide contact names, phone numbers and e-mail. Highlight the date, time and place. Briefly describe the purpose, speakers and if there will be photo opportunities. Indicate the end of the page by placing a "###".

Page 15 Part IV: Advocacy Strategies

1.   Write a media advisory A media advisory is written to media outlets before an event, alerting them of an upcoming event. It only includes the very basics of the event of a media advisory is to persuade the media into coming and covering the event. Present your event as worthy of coverage!2 (For example, see Appen-dix A.)  

The media is a means of communication that is designed to reach vast amounts of people.

There are four basic types:

1. Television 2. Radio 3. Newspapers & magazines 4. Internet

Page 17: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

4. Write a press release A press release is a report written for press to read during an event. It is generally 1-2 pages describing the basic findings of a report, sometimes including quotes by speakers, and is released on the day of the event. Press releases should be distributed during the event. Sometimes press releases are used to issue statements in reaction to news events. For example, PSR might issue a press release in support of proposed gun control legislation. Make sure to send PSR National a copy of the release! (For example, see Appendix B.)

Best  Practices  

Be concise and keep press releases short.

Be sure to include a contact person.

Always have the date of the event on all materials.

Call to confirm that your press materials were received and maintain a relationship with the media source.

Part IV: Advocacy Strategies Page 16

Format Two pages maximum, double-spaced, one-sided Brief headline Highlight the release date Provide contact names and numbers Indicate the end of the page by placing a "###". Include a sentence or two about your organization.

5. Editorials and op-eds An op-ed is an opinion piece that generally runs in a daily newspaper showcasing a specific issue that an authorized individual feels passionate about. Op-eds can raise the profile of an important issue, establish your group as a player in the solution of a problem, and encourage citizen action. (For example, see Appendix D.)

6. Facebook and other social media

networks Social media networks, such as Facebook, are great tools and resources to use in order to get a message out to a large mass of young people. Facebook has many potential SPSR advocates take ad-vantage of the opportunities and networks that social media gives you access to.

Page 18: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Strategy  #3:  Hosting  events   Events are a perfect way to invite outsiders to learn more about your issues and the mission of your group. Planning events also gives your group members the opportunity to have a greater involvement in the activities of the organization. Ultimately, by holding events, you will be expanding your support base and educating your local community.

Tactics:    1. Book signings Book signings are a great way to attract new, potential SPSR

advocates as well as current ones. By having a popular and knowledgeable author (a sort of celebrity) speak about an issue that SPSR focuses on, i.e. nuclear proliferation, you can draw current as well as potentially new members to unite for an interesting event. Offering discounted books, personally signed by the author, may be a magnet as well.

Best  Practices  

Always provide food and beverage.

Provide biographies of speakers or panelists,

Keep a sign-in sheet available to keep track of all attendees. Include space for

Be sure to follow up with attendees via e-mail or phone call.

Page 17 Part IV: Advocacy Strategies

2. Panel discussion Panels with experts in a relevant field speaking about SPSR issues draw many students, as students are gen-erally interested in gaining contacts and networking. By hosting these panels, you may be able to expand your SPSR chapter!

3. Campus organization fairs These fairs are a perfect way to introduce your chapter to the rest of your college cam-pus. Generally, each club will be assigned one table that they can use to advertise their group. Make fliers or brochures, and

Make sure to have a few sign-up sheets handy with fields for names and e-mail ad-dresses.

Page 19: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

4. Movie screenings Movie screenings are generally centered around a

movie that is relevant to your specific issue. For example, if you are interested in nuclear disarmament, you could have a movie screening in

Hold a reception afterwards that involves a discussion and some free food to allow members to discuss how they felt about the movie! Movie screenings increase awareness in an entertaining way, and thus can be really popular and well attended events.

5. Grand Rounds on Medical School Campuses This is generally a

presentation delivered by an expert, often based on a specific patient or case, with a question and answer session at the end. Before the presentation, give a short summary of your SPSR chapter and its recent activity, and after the presentation, make sure to encourage the medical students present to attend

next meeting, and persuade them to come.

Part IV: Advocacy Strategies Page 18

Page 20: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Strategy  #4:  Building  partnerships   Working on climate change? Safe energy? There are probably dozens of other organizations that are working on the same topic. Research other local groups that seem like good matches. Partnering with these other groups such as civic groups or academic programs may be helpful as you will be able to pool resources. Attend their events, network, look for opportunities to partner, and be sure to support their campaigns, because they are likely to support yours! PSR leaders are a unique contribution to the advocacy movement because they add the medical perspective to an otherwise policy-only advocacy strategy. Tactics:  

Best  Practices  

Consider the list of organi-zations that PSR has histori-cally worked with, and find a local chapter.

If the event was a success, stay in contact with the group, inviting them to your SPSR meetings or other events.

Always write a thank you note to the officers of the club and anyone else who helped make your event a success!

Page 19 Part IV: Advocacy Strategies

1) Engage your local government office

Chances are if you get someone from local or national government to attend an event, the media will cover it. This puts

bly will attract more members! Maybe

an SPSR chapter. 2) Co-chair events with other campus

organizations Be sure to participate in campus events that can give your chapter exposure to the student body, and find groups that are interested in the same top-ics as your group. This way, you can co-host your events with them, and have each

3) Media Outreach Build relationships

with your local media. The stronger the relationship, the more likely they will come cover your events. You can never have enough media contacts!

Page 21: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Appendix A Example of Media Advisory

TO:  Oregon  media           Contact:  John  Smith  202-­666-­6661  RE:  Media  Advisory  for  Feb.  26,  2010            Joe  Schmoe  202-­666-­6662                        Jane  Doe          202-­666-­6663    

DOCTORS  WARN  THAT  GLOBAL  WARMING  WILL  HAVE  SEVERE  IMPACT  ON  HEALTH  IN  OREGON  

 Physicians  for  Social  Responsibility  (PSR)  releases  

   EVENT:   At   a   press   briefing   in   Portland,  Oregon,   PSR   speakers  will   present   key  findings   from   Degrees   of   Danger:   The   Health   Effects   of   Climate   Change   and  Energy   in   Oregon,   a   new   report   alerts   Oregon   residents   to   the   health   effects   of  climate  change.      DATE/TIME:  Tuesday,  February  26,  2010    10:00  am      PLACE:  The  Galleria,  921  SW  Morrison  St,  Room  533      SPEAKERS:    John  Smith,  Ph.D.,  Board  member  of  Physicians  for  Social  Responsibility.  

 Joe   Schmoe,   MD,   is   an   Internal   Medicine   physician   at   XYZ   University   and  Board  member  of  PSR.  

 Jane  Doe,  MD,  is  an  Oncologist  in  California,  and  Board  member  of  PSR.  

   Degrees   of   Danger   will   be   posted   on-­line   on   February   26.   An   embargoed   press  release  and  report  can  be  viewed  by  request  prior  to  the  release.      

###  

Appendix Page 20

Page 22: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 21 Appendix

Appendix B Example of Press Release

           

Defeat  of  Dirty  Air  Act  represents  a  big  win  for  safeguarding  public  health    

June  11,  2010    Washington,   D.C.     -­    The  U.S.  Senate  defeated,  47    53,   the  Murkowski  Dirty  Air  Act  

to  control  carbon  pollution.    By  rejecting  this  resolution,  the  majority  of  the  Senate  voted  to  base  U.S.  climate  policy  on  the  burgeoning  scientific  evidence  that  climate  change  is  underway,  that  human  activity  is  a  major  driver  of  carbon  pollution,  and  that  urgent  action  is  needed  to  protect  human  health  and  the  environment.    

established   the   legal   basis   for   establishing   rules   to   limit   carbon   pollution   from   large  emitters  of  CO2,  including  coal-­fired  power  plants,  heavy  industry  and  motor  vehicles.    Physicians   for  Social  Responsibility  Executive  Director  Dr.  Peter  Wilk  had   the   following  response:    "The   Clean   Air   Act   is   our   most   successful   environmental   law   on   record   and   it   has  effectively   controlled  many  dangerous  air   pollutants   for   the  past   forty   years.    We  must  use   every   tool   available,   including   EPA   authority   under   the   Clean   Air   Act,   to   limit  greenhouse  gas  emission   from   large  sources   immediately.    The  vote   today  echoes   the  call  heard  across  the  country  for  action  to  limit  carbon  pollution.      In  an  ongoing  effort  to  delay   capping   these   dangerous   pollutants,   Senator   Murkowski   attempted   to   obfuscate  her   protection   of   Big   Oil   and   Dirty   Coal,   claiming   that   EPA   regulators   should   not   be  setting   climate   policy.     This   vote   against   her   resolution   demonstrates   a   resounding  rejection  of  her  intent  to  place  corporate  and  private  interest  politics  before  the  health  of  our  nation.    PSR   is  grateful   to  all   the  Senators   that   voted   to  protect   current  and   future  generations.    And  we  thank  all  our  PSR  members  whose  calls  to  the  Senate  helped  make  this  happen."    Contact:  Kristen  Welker-­Hood,  kwelker-­[email protected],  202-­587-­5244    ###    PSR  is  the  medical  and  public  health  voice  working  to  prevent  the  use  or  spread  of  nuclear  weapons  and  to  slow,  stop  and  reverse  global  warming  and  the  toxic  degradation  of  the  environment.    For  more  information  on  the  work  of  the  largest  physician  led  organization  in  the  country,  please  visit  www.psr.org.    

Page 23: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Appendix C Example of Letter to Editor

Dear  Editor,    As  a  citizen  who  believes  that  nuclear  weapons  are  the  greatest  threats  facing  our  country,  I  am  pleased  that  Senator  Corker,  as  a  critical  member  of  the  Senate  Foreign  Relations  Committee,  joined  the  bi-­partisan  consensus  (from  Sam  Nunn  to  Robert  Gates)  and  voted  in  support  of  the  New  START  Treaty.  It  is  reassuring  that  we  have  leaders  like  Senator  Corker  who  put  national  security  over  partisan  politics  and  provided  bi-­partisan  support  for  New  START.    I  hope  that  Senator  Alexander  

floor  of  the  Senate.    Now  is  the  time  to  confront  the  dangers  of  nuclear  proliferation  head  on    and  we  

the  New  START  agreement  to  be  held  hostage  by  the  reactionary  measures  and  bitter  Senate  politics  that  have  characterized  other  issues.    Now  we  need  Senator  

START  comes  to  the  floor  of  the  Senate.      Sincerely,    [Your  name]  [Your  address]  

Appendix Page 22

Page 24: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Page 23 Appendix

Appendix D Example of Op-Ed

           

 

Lessons  from  the  Gulf  for  nuclear  reactors  By  Dr.  Jeffery  Patterson,  president  of  Physicians  for  Social  Responsibility  -­  07/16/10  12:09  PM  ET    One  crucial  lesson  from  the  BP  oil  spill  is  that  measures  to  speed  licensing,  cut  corners  on  safety  and  undermine  regulation  can  lead  to  tragic  consequences.  Yet  Congress  appears  on  the  verge  of  repeating  mistakes  that  led  to  the  environmental  catastrophe  in  the  Gulf.  

Federal  lawmakers  are  weighing  a  BP-­type  deregulation  of  new  nuclear  reactors    the  one  energy  source  in  which  damage  from  a  major  accident  could  dwarf  harm  done  by  a  ruptured  offshore  oil  well.  

In  this  effort,  the  nuclear  industry's  backers  are  working  both  sides  of  the  street.  On  one  hand,  they  proclaim  that  the  current  nuclear  regulatory  system  is  so  superior  it  could  well  serve  as  a  model  for  regulating  the  petrochemical  industry.  

At  the  same  time,  those  nuclear  proponents  are  working  behind  the  scenes  for  regulatory  rollbacks  that  would  dramatically  reshape  safety  and  environmental  requirements  for  new  reactors.  These  provisions  might  be  incorporated  into  a  climate  bill,  or  into  a  narrower  "energy-­only"  bill  that  could  be  voted  on  by  the  Senate  as  early  as  this  month.  

The  result  of  the  changes  making  the  rounds  of  Capitol  Hill  would  further  undermine  Nuclear  Regulatory  Commission  (NRC)  safety  reviews  by  truncating  the  licensing  process  for  new  reactors,  scaling  back  environmental-­impact  reviews,  and  limiting  public  transparency  in  reactor  licensing  decisions.  All  are  bad  ideas.  

Here  are  a  few  of  the  problematic  provisions  proposed  in  draft  legislation  that  should  not  be  included  in  a  final  climate  or  energy  bill:  

 The  NRC  would  not  be  authorized  to  prevent  startup  of  a  new  reactor,  even  if  fundamental  safety  components  already  inspected  were  later  compromised  in  the  construction  process.  

 The  NRC  would  be  required  to  propose  and  implement  an  "expedited  procedure"  for  issuing  construction  and  operating  licenses  for  new  reactors  under  certain  conditions.  

 An  impossibly  high  standard  would  be  set  for  including  an  evaluation  of  the  need  for  power,  the  cost  of  the  new  reactor,  and  alternative  energy  sources  within  the  NRC  licensing  process.  

 The  NRC  could  no  longer  hold  a  mandatory  hearing  to  do  an  independent  safety  and  environmental  review  in  new  reactor  licensing.

Page 25: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Appendix

Appendix D-2 Example of Op-

                                                 

 

Nuclear  reactors  already  have  the  most  streamlined  licensing  process  of  any  type  of  industrial  facility  in  the  United  States.  What  is  delaying  the  review  of  reactor  applications  isn't  the  licensing  process,  but  the  fact  that  the  industry  has  been  unable  to  submit  adequate  design  proposals  for  reactors  or  to  respond  to  the  NRC  in  timely  fashion.  

Rather  than  weakening  reactor  safety  rules,  Congress  should  send  the  NRC  the  right  message    safety  over  speed    by  strengthening  them.  

For  example,  the  NRC  should  be  required  to  take  into  consideration  "worst-­case"  accident  situations.  The  NRC  has  resisted  pressure  to  analyze  risks  posed  by  terrorist  attacks  on  spent  fuel  storage  casks,  although  such  an  attack  could  cause  a  severe  release  of  radiation.  As  with  the  Deepwater  Horizon  offshore  drilling  rig,  mere  assurance  that  the  worst-­case  situation  won't  happen  is  a  hollow  promise.  

The  notion  that  lack  of  a  recent  major  reactor  accident  makes  such  an  occurrence  a  "remote  possibility,"  therefore  justifying  lax  safety  regulation,  is  the  same  illogical  and  irresponsible  thinking  that  set  the  stage  for  the  BP  disaster.  

As  the  oil  spill  illustrates  all  too  well,  the  more  complex  the  technology,  the  greater  the  chance  of  catastrophic  failure.  Because  of  human  error,  technological  failure  or  unforeseen  events,  it  is  virtually  guaranteed  that  there  will  be  other  major  disasters.  The  catastrophic  effects  of  these  on  human  health  and  our  environment  will  continue  for  generations.  As  we  have  seen  at  Chernobyl  and  are  seeing  in  the  Gulf,  our  environment  cannot  sustain  this  continued  onslaught.  

We  must  drastically  change  the  direction  of  our  energy  future.  This  is  possible  through  the  use  of  clean,  renewable  and  sustainable  technologies.  When  it  comes  to  disasters  caused  by  technologies  such  as  deep  offshore  drilling  or  nuclear  power,  even  one  accident  is  one  too  many.  

Patterson  is  president  of  Physicians  for  Social  Responsibility  and  a  professor  in  the  Department  of  Family  Medicine  at  the  University  of  Wisconsin  School  of  Medicine  and  Public  Health  in  Madison.  

Page 24

Page 26: SPSR Advocacy Toolkit

Citations Page 25 Works Cited

1Sharma, Ritu R.. "What is Advocacy?". An Introduction to Advocacy, SARA/AED Advocacy Training

Guide. 2"The Press Advisory." Physicians for Human Rights. 2009. <http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/toolkit/

media-and-publicity/the-press-advisory.html>.