SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

10

Click here to load reader

description

Introduction We continue to search for possible causes of the suspected 1.4GHz microwave instability in the SPS. Last element of the list was simulated and impedance has been included in the table. Small study on the possibility of including the damping resistors in simulations has been carried out.

Transcript of SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Page 1: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

SPS flangesSimulations & Measurements

Update

Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela

Page 2: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Outline

• Introduction• Impedance List Update• Damping Resistors in Simulations• Conclusions

Page 3: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Introduction• We continue to search for possible causes of the

suspected 1.4GHz microwave instability in the SPS.

• Last element of the list was simulated and impedance has been included in the table.

• Small study on the possibility of including the damping resistors in simulations has been carried out.

Page 4: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Outline

• Introduction• Impedance List Update• Damping Resistors in Simulations• Conclusions

Page 5: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Total Flange ImpedanceFlange Type Enamel Bellow Num. of

elementsFreq. [GHz] Impedance Q R/Q [Ω] Resistor

BPV-QD Yes Yes 90 1.21 633kΩ 315 2010 No

BPH-QF Yes Yes 39 1.28 1.03MΩ 400 2496 Long

QF-MBA Yes Yes 83 1.41 1.6MΩ 268 5985 Short

MBA-MBA Yes Yes 14 1.41 297kΩ 285 1040 Short

QF-QF No Yes 26 1.41 3.767MΩ 1828 2061 Short

QD-QD Yes No 99 1.57 17kΩ 55 317 No

QF-QF No No 20 1.61 588kΩ 980 600 No

BPH-QF Yes Yes 39 1.62 121kΩ 120 1014 Long

QD-QD No No 75 1.8 651kΩ 881 739 No

QD-QD Yes No 99 1.89 186kΩ 175 1070 No

No damping resistors included in simulations.

The ‘Resistor’ column states whether or not each element should have a resistor.

Page 6: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Outline

• Introduction• Impedance List Update• Damping Resistors in Simulations• Conclusions

Page 7: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Damping Resistor DC Measurement

A 4-wire DC measurement was taken on a long damping resistor as shown in the Figure.

The measured resistance was 160Ω.

A conductivity value of15.7 S/m for the

Nickel-Chrome layer was deduced from the measured

value.

Page 8: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Damping Resistor in SimulationsSimulation

no Resistor

Simulationwith

Resistor

Meas.no

Resistor

Meas.with

Resistor

f [GHz] 1.423 1.414

(-0.68%) 1.417 1.411(-0.42%)

Q0 1910 174 1930 186

The volume of the resistor represents around 1.5% of the total cavity volume.

6% rel. error

Page 9: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Outline

• Introduction• Impedance List Update• Damping Resistors in Simulations• Conclusions

Page 10: SPS flanges Simulations & Measurements Update Fritz Caspers and Jose E. Varela.

Conclusions• All the elements in the original flange list have

been analysed.

• The impedance, Q and R/Q values have been provided for the bigger resonances.

• A ‘calibration’ of the conductivity value to be used in simulations for the Nickel-Chrome has been carried out.