Spring 2007Organization Structure1. Spring 2007Organization Structure2 Why Organizations Are...
-
Upload
geraldine-bell -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of Spring 2007Organization Structure1. Spring 2007Organization Structure2 Why Organizations Are...
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 1
Organization Structure
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 2
Why Organizations Are Structured
• Organizing:• The deployment and structuring of organizational resources
to achieve organizational goals
• Dimensions• Specialization / division of labor
• Formal lines of authority
• Mechanisms for coordination
• Organization or structure is designed to:• Facilitate accomplishment of organizational goals
• Fit with technology and environment
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 3
Dimensions of Organization Structure
• Hierarchical• Vertical dimension• “...relative ranks in a manner similar to the organization
chart”
• Functional• Horizontal dimension• “...different types of work to be done”
• Inclusion or centrality• “...the degree to which any given person is nearer to or
farther from the central core of the organization”
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 4
Specialization / Division of Labor
• Adam Smith and the pins• Efficiency vs. effectiveness• Individuals perform well-defined tasks
• Short training time• Individuals become expert• Individuals can perform tasks for which they are best
suited• Problems
• Lose sight of overall goal• Boredom, fatigue, stress• Lack of flexibility
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 5
Issues in Determining Division of Labor
• Nature of the work• Complexity of work• Task interdependency
• Organization• Goals (re-engineering)• Resources
• Employees• Abilities• Expectations
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 6
Authority and Responsibility
• Look back at Fayol, Weber• Chain of command
• Unity of command• Scalar principle
• Authority• The right to make decisions, issue orders and allocate
resources• Does it exist if not accepted?
• Responsibility• Accountability • Unity of authority and responsibility
• Delegation• Line and staff
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 7
Span of Control
• Tall vs. flat organizations• Nature of work
• Stability• Task similarity• Location
• Employees• Preferences• Skills
• Organization• Policies and procedures• Support for managers
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 8
Centralization vs. Decentralization
• Where are decisions made?
• Need for pooled resources
• Speed and flexibility (environmental uncertainty)
• Consistency
• Where is the knowledge?
• Who must implement decisions
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 9
Formalization
• Policies and procedures• Bureaucracy• Max Weber again
• Pro• Uniformity• Less uncertainty
• Con• Less flexibility
• Deciding• Nature of the work• Nature of the employees
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 10
TeamsFree flow of information
Wide spans of controlDecentralization
Low formalization
Organic
Mechanistic vs. Organic Structures
High specializationRigid departmentalizationClear chain of commandNarrow span of control
CentralizationHigh formalization
Mechanistic
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 11
Departmentalization
• Functional• Divisional
• Product• Customer• Geographical
• Matrix• Project teams
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 12
Functional Structures
• Pro:• Specialization
• Efficiency
• Career progress for employees
• High-quality problem solving
• Con:• Poor communication between functions
• May be too centralized
• Employees have limited perspective on total organization
• Where best used• Stable environment
• Single product
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 13
Functional Structure
VPSalesVP
Sales
VPManufacturing
VPManufacturing
VPFinance
VPFinance
CEOCEO
G/ LG/ L
TaxTax
BudgetBudget
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 14
Divisional
• Types• Product• Geographical• Customer
• Pro:• Speed and flexibility of
response• Cross-fertilization of ideas• Focus on product /
customer / area• Emphasis on
organizational goals
• Where best used• Uncertain environment• Diversified organization
• Con:• Resources duplicated
(inefficient)• Less coordination
between divisions• Competition for resources
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 15
Sample Divisional Structure
VPCereal
VPCereal
VPDetergent
VPDetergent
VPPaperVP
Paper
CEOCEO
TissueTissue
DiapersDiapers
TowelsTowels
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 16
ThyssenKrupp
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 17
Sara Lee Structure
Household Products
Headquarters
Food and Beverage
Intimates and Underwear
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 18
University of Tennessee SystemBoard ofTrustees
UT- Martin UT - KnoxvilleUT -
Chattanooga
Health Science Center at Memphis
Space Institute at Tullahoma
Institute of Agriculture
Institute for Public Service
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 19
Mixed Structure
VPAdmin
VPAdmin
VPManufacturing
VPManufacturing
VPSalesVP
Sales
CEOCEO
RetailRetail
WholesaleWholesale
InternationalInternational
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 20
Unilever Structure
Home & Personal Care
• Africa, Middle East & Turkey Bestfoods
• Ice Cream and Frozen Foods
• Latin America & Slim.fast worldwide
• Unilever Bestfoods Asia
• Unilever Bestfoods, Europe
• Unilever Bestfoods, North America
Unilever Bestfoods
• Africa, Middle East & Turkey Home
• Diverseyever
• Home and Personal Care, Asia
• Home & Personal Care, Europe
• Home & Personal Care, North America
• Latin America
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 21
Matrix
• Dual lines of authority• Examples• Pro:
• Combines advantages of functional and divisional structures
• Con:• Conflict may arise• Cost associated with grater need for coordination
• Where best used:• Extreme environmental pressure• Very large or geographically dispersed organizations
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 22
Organizing Work Processes
• Unit production
• Mass production
• Process production
Spring 2007 Organization Structure 23
Technology, Structure and Effectiveness
Characteristic Unit Mass Process Vertical Differentiation
Low Moderate High
Horizontal Differentiation
Low High Low
Formalization Low High Low
Structure Organic Mechanistic Organic