SPRI. Standard Bank Africa. Power Sector in Africa
-
Upload
grupo-spri -
Category
Business
-
view
410 -
download
0
Transcript of SPRI. Standard Bank Africa. Power Sector in Africa
Private and confidential
Power sector in Africa
Supporting sustainable economic growth
Rentia van Tonder
Head: Power, CIB
May 2016
Private and confidential
Introduction to Standard Bank
2
Universal bank
Established in 1862
Africa’s top bank (by Tier 1 capital) in the annual
ranking of 1,000 banks globally – ranked 116 and
only African bank in top 150 (2014) – The Banker
Headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa
ICBC, the largest bank in China, is a 20.1%
shareholder in Standard Bank
– ICBC is currently ranked No.1 in The
Banker’s annual ranking of the top 1,000
banks globally (2014)
1,250 branches across the continent, supported by
8,802 ATMs
Over 42,200 banking employees
Representation in major financial centres, including
London, New York and Beijing
Standard Bank Group
Africa is our calling card
3
CountryStandard Bank
branches*ATMs
Corporate
Banking
Retail
Banking
Investor
Services
Investment
Banking
South Africa 682 7,466 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Angola 27 31 ✔ ✔ ✔
Botswana 11 26 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Côte d’ Ivoire - - - - - ✔
DRC 5 - ✔ ✔
Ghana 34 67 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Kenya 24 43 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Lesotho 17 77 ✔ ✔ ✔
Malawi 25 64 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Mauritius 1 - ✔Private
clients✔ ✔
Mozambique 42 93 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Namibia 47 166 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Nigeria 179 390 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
South Sudan 1 1 ✔ ✔ ✔
Swaziland 10 62 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Tanzania 10 33 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Uganda 94 174 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Zambia 22 82 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Zimbabwe 19 27 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
TOTAL 1,250 8,802 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Standard Bank
Local on-the-ground expertise supported by a strong retail presence
* Includes service centres and access banking centres
Standard Bank
Stanbic Bank
Stanbic IBTC Bank
CFC Stanbic Bank
Representative office
Ghana
Nigeria
South
Sudan
KenyaDRC
Angola
Namibia
South
Africa Lesotho
Swaziland
MauritiusBotswana
Zambia
ZimbabweMozambique
Malawi
Tanzania
Uganda
Côte
d’Ivoire
Private and confidential
Key sector Themes
5Key sector themes
Persistent power supply
and demand imbalance to
continue to drive sector
investment…
• Access to electricity
remains low across SSA
(est. 24%, WB)
• Overall infrastructure
spending to grow by
10% p.a. over the next
decade
• Requirements estimated
at $180bn by 2025
(PwC, 2014)
...But choice of feedstock
critical in shaping
investment needs…
• Abundance of natural
resources to help
diversify energy mix
• Hydro, coal and gas to
remain key feed stocks
in Southern Africa
• e.g. Enormous hydro
potential in countries
such as Mozambique
(12GW), Zambia
(6.1GW)
• But choice of feedstock
has an influence on: 1)
time-to-market, 2)
environment; and 3)
costs
• Generally help mobilize
financing of commercial
banks
• Many international banks
continue to lean on DFIs
to supply due diligence,
guarantees etc. in order
to participate in
transactions
...Financeability of projects key to reducing project complexity…
• Development of large power projects (>500MW) on fiscus alone to
remain challenging
• Need for SOEs to consider developing projects as a % of their
GCFs
Growing importance of
capital enhancement
products and structures…
• Structured products
backed by credit
enhancement
mechanisms such as
ECAs (and that match
long-term CFs) are
critical to de-risking
power transactions
• Also help encourage
participation of
international lenders
• Positive impact on both
credit and insurance
tenors
…DFIs’ increasing
reluctance to finance
coal-fired projects…
• Increasing challenge in
tapping into DFI sources
of liquidity for coal power
projects
• DFIs such as the World
Bank and EBRD have
agreed to either limit
financing of or scrap
most assistance for coal-
fired power plants to
“rare circumstances”.
• Implications for debt
tenor and risk covers for
future coal-fired plants
12
6
4
5
A number of
significant trends
can be observed in
the African power
market…
…DFIs continue to play a
pivotal role in African
power development…
3
What do we see in the market? Key points
China, Europe, Americas, Middle East KENYA
An international darling for investment
Solid pipeline (Geothermal, wind, coal)
Internal stakeholder management inline
with current portfolio
Strong Chinese EPC involvement in
deals
TANZANIA
Decreasing power generation costs with
commission of Gas power plants
Clean up of govt related receivables is
a priority
Growth of Off-grid solar market
UGANDA
GETFIT- RE power projects (1-20 MW)
To be developed by IPPs for a total
installed capacity of 170 MW
Offgrid
ETHIOPIA
Renewables and Transmission
East Africa
GHANA
Sector reform: Towards cost
reflective tariffs
IPPs:Gas to power
RE Programme
Privatisation of ECG
NIGERIA
IPPs: Gas to power & Renewables (REFiT
Programme)
Distributed Power & solar city concept
Sector regulatory reform
Restructuring of DISCOs
West Africa
COTE D’IVOIRE
IPPs (Gas, hydro & Coal)
Well-adopted user pay principles
Need for strong anchor investors
South Africa
Slow economic growth, depreciating currency
Low FDI, possible downgrade
Increased focus on IPPs
Eskom B/S challenges – Increasing tariffs
IPP programs
REIPPP- 92 projects (6328MW) R192bn
- low RE tariffs (<60c/kwh)
Coal Baseload - 2 projects (900MW)
- Liquidity issues – delayed
Cogen – low uptake
Gas to power – RFQ
Potential Off-grid opportunities
Mining & industrial companies
ANGOLA
Increase generation capacity
Power sector strongly tied to
government
BOTSWANA
Coal IPPs & Renewables
MOZAMBIQUE
IPPs across technologies
Strategic support for e.g. EDM
& HCB
MALAWI
Coal IPPs, Off-grid
MCC Compact
South & Central Africa
NAMIBIA
• Implementation challenges
• Wind, Solar & Gas to power
ZAMBIA
• Rocky road to cost reflective
tariffs
• Emergency power
• Diversifying generation mix
• World Bank Scaling solar
program
• Elections
ZIMBABWE
Captive power
Renewables & Coal
Chinese interest
The Power Landscape & Key Themes We Are Seeing
Themes
summarized:
The Opportunities:
Power shortages resulting
in an increased need for
generation capacity and
grid improvement
Diversifying power
generation mix
Renewables on the rise
Improving grid
connectivity
Development of off-grid
and smart solutions
The Challenges
Tariff cost reflectiveness
Creditworthiness of the
utilities
Lower commodity prices
affecting government
revenues
Availability of government
support and level to which
SB can rely on such given
economic headwinds in
most countries
Potential impact of
elections in SB presence
countries in:
‘16 - Uganda, Ghana,
Possibility of Power Trading
Key strategies for the power sector
Enhance and grow
client base
Bank the full value
chain
Stimulate
innovative funding
solutions
African footprint China &
international
connectivity
• Existing and core
clients
• Targeted new clients
• Power transactions can
unlock further
opportunities to bank
• Proactive risk mitigation
structured solutions
• Leverage off in-country
teams
• Build strong knowledge
base of local regulatory
environment
• Actively brand
Standard Bank’s China
connectivity
2 3 4 51
Formulation of IPP
policy
Electricity
Resource plan
(appropriate
energy mix)
Increasing
electricity access
Support and
targeted programs
Treasury Policy
thought leadership
Tariff cost
reflectiveness & grid
strengthening
Creditworthiness
Pre-paid metering
Rehabilitation of
existing assets
New generation
Lending against ring
fenced security/cash
Focus on financially
strong and experienced
Understanding
vertically integrated
companies
Targeting minimum
Hurdle IRRs
Seeking local partners
Growth into ROA
Off-grid distributed
power
Acquisition of operating
assets
Seek innovative
financing to reduce
cost (esp SA)
Experience and track
record key
COP21 impacts on
technologies
supported
Focus on projects
with realistic size
Diversifying in project
sponsors / developer
SA Consolidation
Drive towards African
projects
Asset financing
Leveraging
Focus on monitoring
performance
Become primary
banker
Key growth across
Africa
Selling off operating
assets (M&A activity
in SA)
Bankable PPAs
applicable to
technology
KEY
THEMES
AND FOCUS
AREAS
Our Strategy Along the Power Sector Value Chain
Generation Distribution
GOVERNMENT
Transmission
UTILITIES SPONSORS EPC/O&M/OEM IPP
8
Low level of electricity tariffs inhibits investment in the sector
Current average electricity tariffs in Southern Africa varies
between $4.8-11.5 cents/KWh
Development of any power plant for commercial purposes likely
to result in higher/cost reflective tariff or significant cost savings
for the Sponsor (assuming own-use objectives)
High AT&C losses
Many African electricity markets have a level
of AT&C losses that can be considered high
sometimes up to [40]%
The combination of increasing electricity load
and growing demand-supply gap is resulting
in frequent outages and blackouts
Need to construct the associated
transmission system that will allow for the
evacuation of the extra capacity expected to
be generated
Lack of effective domestic wheeling framework
Framework must be standardised and transparent for all
arrangements
Pricing and risk sharing should facilitate wheeling not
prevent it
Key points
Low level of
electricity tariffs has
inhibited investment
in many African
electricity markets…
…Lack of
standardised
domestic wheeling
framework remains an
issue in many African
markets…
…There is a need for
an appropriate risk
allocation between the
private sector and the
buyers
2 Key commercial considerations
Commercial
Credit quality of the offtakers
In many African jurisdictions, public utilities are the primary
offtakers
Yet the universe of financially solid offtakers is shrinking
As a result, Government support is often required to stand
behind buyer, in order to provide comfort to private sector
(developers, equity participants, lenders, etc.) that PPA
availability payments will be made accordingly and
termination provisions are fair (and termination payments
will be funded)
The market requires a bankable PPA
The need for an appropriate risk allocation
between the private sector and the buyers is
even more paramount than ever in many
African jurisdictions
Investors typically want to see a balanced
liability regime, appropriate protections for the
generation companies for risks not within
their control, a stablisation clause for changes
of law, fair termination events for both buyers
and sellers etc.
9
Long-term (12-15 years) financing in many African jurisdictions
without PRI
This is typically not available from the international commercial
banking market.
However, long-term ECA solution + DFI tranche could provide
tenors of up to 15 years in some instances
PRI cover will be required to support long-term commercial debt
(non-DFI or ECA) providers.
Shorter term (up to 7 years) local commercial bank funding
usually available without PRI.
DFI to provide larger tranches than that expected to be provided
by commercial banks.
Likely high local cost component in some
markets (e.g. SA, Mozambique etc.)
Impact on level of support from ECAs
Consider contractor selection in conjunction
with ECA support maximisation
Appetite from local banks for shorter dated tenor
structures usually high
Market knowledge and no PRI requirements
Typical debt tenors of up to 7 years per bank
View of banks on sovereign country risks critical
Negative or non-existent sovereign notes typically have a negative impact on both the debt tenors and financing terms power
projects will be expected to secure in the market.
Significant FX and convertibility risks also affect many African markets
As a result, projects with revenues denominated in $ dollar are important as they help mitigate risks
Key points
Long-term (12-15
year) financing in
many African
jurisdictions without
PRI is usually not
available from
international
commercial banking
market…
…Negative or non-
existent sovereign
notes typically have a
negative impact on
both the debt tenors
and financing terms
power…
…Consideration for
contractor selection in
conjunction with ECA
support maximisation
will be key
3 Key funding considerations
Funding
10
On grid: REIPPP On grid: Other
Programs
BD1-3: Portfolio
SBSA significant underwrite
17 projects
BD3.5:
1 CSP project
BD4:
SBSA successful with 5 projects (3 PV & 2 Wind)
Accelerated round announced for 1800MW (Nov’15)
Matured Market – further 6300MW
BD5: New RfP expected 2016
Small IPPs (1-5MWs)
Co-generation
RfP released first bidding August 2015
High energy intensive
users, Paper & Sugar
Base load
Bid submission Nov’15 for 2500MW
Imported Hydro
RfP expected 2017
Gas IPP RFI:
Announced RFQ expected end 2016
Off grid RE Solutions
Power security (reliability
of supply)
Growing demandfrom industry to findself generationsolutions
Opportunities:
Rooftop applications
PV/hybrid plants for
industry
Rural electrification
Challenges:
Off take risk
Finance model – On BSor project finance
Ring fenced programs backed by government
(PPAs signed by Eskom)
Estimatedmarket:
Base load: R100-150bn
Co-gen: R 60 -80bn
IRP 2020 RE: R100-150bn
RE: Current: R192bn
Further Determination
(6300MW): R 160bn
Base load: R100-150bn
Co-gen: R 60 -80bn
Gas IPP: R45bn (3100MW)
IRP 2020: R100-150bn
Announced
Currently running
SBSA’s RE
portfolio:
17 Projects
14 connected
Over 700MW
South African landscape:
Various IPP programs…
Key challenges & threats:
• Grid capacity;
• Reduced IRRs;
• Internal communication & coordination
between govn. Dept. and SOEs;
• Gas infrastructure;
• BEE funding;
• Slipping timelines;
• Investor confidence.
11
Thank you
Rentia van TonderHead: Power
Corporate and Investment Banking
The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
Tel: +27 11 721 4614
Cell: +27 83 257 0805
12
Mozambique: Gigawatt
Based on an appropriately structured risk profile, the table below
indicated indicative terms for the Gigawatt deal for commercial
debt:
Key terms of debt financingOverview of the project
Overview of the company/ies
Gigawatt is a 118 MW gas fired power station situated at Ressano
Garcia, Mozambique
The project reached financial close in June 2014. Total project
cost is approximately US$212m, with US$ 170m of debt
Gigawatt’s main sponsor is Gigajoule International who partly
owns and operates a gas pipeline from Ressano Garcia to Matola
in Mozambique known as Matola Gas Company (“MGC”)
The off-taker is Electricidade de Moçambique (“EDM”)
The project will be set up as a base load plant and will connect to
the substation at Ressano Garcia which is close to the site
The project will make use of the gas that is allocated for use in
Mozambique by the Mozambican government from the Pande and
Temane gas fields.
Gas supplied for the Project is secured through a 20 year GSA
with MGC, underpinned by a 20 year GSA between Sasol and
MGC.
Borrower Gigawatt
Standard Bank Role Sole Lead Arranger
Industry Power (Gas Fired)
Purpose
Fund the development of
approximately US$ 200 million,
118 MW gas fired power station
in Mozambique
Currency US$ 220m
FacilitySenior debt
Subordinated debt
Tenor 12 years door-to-door
Status
Financial Close reached in
June 2014, construction has
started
Security (Risk Cover)
PRI Cover on US$ Debt
ECIC Cover on SA Content is
likely
Capital Grace 18 Months
Gearing Ratio 75:5:20
Minimum DSCR 1.40x
The Gigajoule Group invests in, develops and operates energy
projects
The Group was founded in 2001 after an initial approach by the
Mozambican government to the founder shareholders to assist
with the development of a domestic gas industry in Mozambique.
Matola Gas Company (“MGC”), which is owned 49.6% by
Gigajoule was created and has the concession rights to transport
and distribute natural gas in the Maputo Province
Additional key shareholders in Gigajoule Power (Subsidiary of
Gigajoule International and the holding company for Gigawatt)
include OMLACSA (Old Mutual Group) and WBHO (SA
Contractor)