Spotlight on supporting non-EU destitute migrants Sally Daghlian Praxis CEO.
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
sheryl-eaton -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Spotlight on supporting non-EU destitute migrants Sally Daghlian Praxis CEO.
Spotlight on supporting non-EU destitute migrants
Sally DaghlianPraxis CEO
Praxis core purpose
to provide help and support for newly arrived and long settled migrants
• to ensure that they are able to live in safety,• meet their essential human needs and • overcome the barriers they face to integrate,
develop and thrive in the UK.
We seek to • challenge exclusion• build solidarity • improve policy and service provision by
drawing on the lived experience of migrants and by supporting migrant communities for their voices to be heard.
Global context
• Conflict /war – refugee movements • Human trafficking• Forced labour (slavery)• Globalisation• Development
• Most refugees hosted in the south, less than 1% in the UK
Syrian refugees - more than 3.8 million in neighbouring countries.
UK context
• Demonization – hostile environment • Blocking access to services – housing, health• Focus on Reconnections as the only solution• Immigration Bill – internal controls/criminalisation• Rising migrant/immigrant homelessness and
destitution
Praxis housing work
• Praxis Work in partnership – not a housing agency
• Testing solutions • Finding pathways out of destitution 3 key elementsAccommodationFood/moneySpecialist immigration advice
Praxis Temporary Homes Project
• Andy Ludlow Award for innovation in homelessness
• Volunteer hosts; vicarage; convent; Metropolitan flat
• Not just houses/beds but homes• immigration advice and hardship fund
Commonweal- Praxis NRPF Project
• Commonweal Housing - housing solutions to social injustice
• Seeking to make bold experiments in housing• Using social investment• Testing innovative solutions• Learning and sustainability/replicability
The model – for London
• Social investors buy 7 properties• 2.5million commitment – Big Society Capital, City
Bridge Trust, Trust for London, Esmee Fairbairn Foundation
• Commonweal lease properties to Praxis• Properties, specs and locations agreed with Praxis• 7 year project• External evaluation from the beginning
Overall Purpose
• To provide quality accommodation and support for NRPF families
• Under contract to local authorities (Sec 17 supported families)
• Social support and specialist immigration casework – quicker resolution
• Cross subsidise free bed spaces for single NRPF• Testing a model
So far... still in set up phase (5 houses)
• Agreements with Croydon and Islington councils – NRPF teams; children’s services
• 21 people housed, including 10 children• Average stay 4.4 months• Evaluation framework in development
Challenges
Finding suitable properties –• price• location • layout • Regulations – HMO, certificates of lawful
development vs planning
Challenges cont...
Local authorities • costs/contracts • speed • referrals• staff turnover
For Praxis – setting up a housing project as a small non-housing organisation - risk
Challenges cont...
• Single family occupancy• Original model to have mixed households• Move-on • Home Office decision making• Local authority response time• Unbudgeted costs
Who needs the service?
• People who came to the UK as children but discover they have no status as adults
• Foreign national parent(s) of British children, with NRPF (often lone women) and unable to work.
• Long settled immigrants who have lost documentation and need to prove rights
• People in transition/limbo awaiting Home Office decisions – unable to work or claim
Case study – Alice
• Brought to UK from Ghana age 3 when her mother died and left in the care of an aunt.• Alice became homeless age 18 (and pregnant) when her aunt died
of cancer.• Presented at local council housing - told that she has no right to
be in the UK and NRPF.• Sofa surfing; transactional arrangements; roofless at 5 months
pregnant• Eventually accommodated by social services and referred to Praxis
Solution – legal case – is under 25 and has spent more than half her life in UK but this has to be evidenced and no legal aid.
conclusions
• Too early to say whether the model is sustainable but the need is there
• Supporting Alice means we can house a single woman with no recourse to public funds (and who has no right to work)
Thank you
Questions?