Spontaneous Parity Violation in Strong Interactions Dhevan Gangadharan (UCLA) On behalf of the STAR...
-
Upload
solomon-ellis -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Spontaneous Parity Violation in Strong Interactions Dhevan Gangadharan (UCLA) On behalf of the STAR...
Spontaneous Parity Violation in Strong InteractionsDhevan Gangadharan (UCLA)On behalf of the STAR CollaborationWWND 2009
1
Parity and How it’s Violated
•Parity transformation – a spatial inversion of a system’s coordinates.
Two classes of Parity Violation:1. Explicit parity violation
Occurs in Weak Interactions▫ Confirmed
2. Spontaneous parity violation Predicted to occur in Strong Interactions
▫ Not yet confirmed (that’s what we are working on)
2
xx
Parity Violation in Weak Interactions
3
S
e- e-
Co-60 beta decay
This is an Explicit parity violation because a parity violating term is explicitly seen in the
Weak Lagrangian
S
e-e-
P transformation
Experimentally observed Not Experimentally observed
4
Parity Violation in Strong Interactions First Ingredient:
Vacuum Transition
NCS= -2 -1 0 1
2
•NCS is the Chern-Simons number and it characterizes the particular gluon field configurations we may create at RHIC.
• The potential energy of the gluon field is periodic in one direction and oscillator-like in all other directions in functional space.
Potential Energy of the Gluon Field
5
Parity Violation in Strong InteractionsSecond Ingredient:
An Extremely Large Magnetic Field
• Spectator nuclei create a very large magnetic field in the QGP region.• STAR TPC Magnetic field is only .5 T• Largest steady magnetic field created by man ~ 15 T• Spectator magnetic field @ (1 fm/c and b=4fm) ~ 1012 T = 1 Trillion Tesla
Parity Violation in Strong Interactions
6
Ingredient 1 + Ingredient 2 -> Electric field Ey
An Ey will then produce charge separation.
This is Spontaneous parity violationsince the sign of Ey goes according to the spontaneously chosen sign of NCS and is not determined by the initial
conditions of the collision
• Kharzeev et al. arXiv : 0406.125v2
0706.1026v2
0711.0950v1
0808.3382v1
The Chiral Magnetic Effect
De-confinement is a must!
Looking For Charge Separation
7
1 1
2
3
,3
sin2cos212
1
n nRPnRPn
TT
nanvdydpp
Nd
pd
dNE
For this analysis we are particularly interested in a1
Looking for Charge Separation•Charge separation is given by a ≠ 0 in
•However, will vanish when averaged over many events because of the equal presence of
+1 and -1 NCS states.
8
RPad
dN
sin21
RPsin
Looking for Charge Separation•Thus, one must use correlation techniques:
•This correlator is P-even. It is therefore susceptible to non-parity violating processes.
9
c
cRPRPRPRP
cRP
c
vaa
v
v
,2
,2
,2
sinsincoscos
2cos
2cos
S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 70, 057901 (2004)
Typically we scale this by v2,c
A Theoretical Prediction for AuAu 130 GeV
10
Kharzeev et al.arXiv:
0711.0950v1This plot represents just one possible experimental result and based on some assumptions such as the magnitude of the:1.Vacuum transition rate2.Magnetic field strength
Experimental result in 200 GeV AuAu roughly obeys this trend and order of magnitude
Cuts Applied to Data
•-30 cm < Primary Vertex Z < 30 cm•-1 < eta < 1
•Pt > .15 GeV/c
•Pt < 2 GeV/c for Pt integrated plots•At least 15 TPC hit points required
•#hit points/#possible hit points > .52
11
There are many independent STAR analyses on this subject which are consistent with each other. The work presented here represents only a
small selection of our results
Other Contributions to our Correlator
P-even processes may make a Contribution
• Flowing Resonances▫ A resonance may be
flowing elliptically (in-plane) and decay into 2 charged particles which may exhibit charge separation.
• Jets▫ Since they are clusters of
correlated charged particles, jets may fake a signal.
Acceptance Effects may make a
Contribution• Re-Centering
▫ The effect of this type of acceptance correction will be demonstrated in this talk.
12
sinsinsin
coscoscos
c 2cos
We take the contribution from flowing resonances to our correlator to be
We estimate the average over resonances from an upper estimate of non-flow azimuthal correlations in 200 GeV AuAu data from .
And the total contribution is found to be less than1% of a1
Background Contributions
13
1. Flowing Resonances may fake a signal
001.
2
2cos
ch
resresres
N
f
Too small to fake a signal
ch
cresresresres
resRP
N
vvf
2
2cos
2cos
,2,2
STAR Collaboration, J. Adams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 062301 (2004).
fres represents the fraction of charged particles coming from a resonance.
We take the contribution from jets to our correlator to be
We estimate the first term from distributions in 200 GeV AuAu data.
And the total contribution is found to be ≈10-7
Background Contributions
14
event
pairs
jet
pairs
event
jet
jetRP N
NN
2cos
2. Jets may fake a signal
trigassocd
dN
038.2cos JetRP
Too small to fake a signal
Our Correlator in Simulated Data
15
Preliminary result
•None of these models incorporate correlations generated by the Chiral Magnetic Effect!• Study done by : Evan Finch (Yale), Ilya Selyuzhenkov (Indiana), Sergei Voloshin
(Wayne State)
Acceptance Correction Study in Simulated Data
16
Before Re-Centering After Re-Centering
The act of Re-Centering, i.e. , does not remove the signal coscoscos
Centrality Bin Centrality Bin
Study done by Alexei Chikanian (Yale)
Preliminary resultPreliminary result
Acceptance Correction Study with Identified Pions in AuAu200
17
Electrons Rejected
Study done by Jim Thomas(LBNL)
Before Corrections After Corrections c 2cos c 2cos
Preliminary result Preliminary result
Conclusions• Heavy Ion Collisions at RHIC might produce
spontaneous parity violation of the strong interactions .
• The magnitude and gross features of a theoretical prediction have been presented. However, more theoretical calculations of the expected signal would be very helpful.
• So far, no P-even processes which could masquerade as the result we see have been identified.
18
The STAR parity-v group•Indiana: I. Selyuzhenkov •BNL: V.Dzhordzhadze, R. Longacre, Y. Semertzidis, P. Sorensen •LBNL: J. Thomas •Yale: J. Sandweiss, E. Finch, A.
Chikanian, R. Majka •UCLA: G. Wang, D. Gangadharan •Wayne State: S. Voloshin
19
More information about this analysis can be found in Sergei Voloshin’s QM08 Poster
“Probe for the (Strong Interaction) parity violation effects in heavy ion collisions with three particle correlations”