Sperm impairments in adult vesper mice (Calomys laucha) caused by in utero exposure to bisphenol A

download Sperm impairments in adult vesper mice (Calomys laucha) caused by in utero exposure to bisphenol A

of 8

description

The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of in utero administration of bisphenol A (BPA) on semen parameters of vesper mice. Sixty female C. laucha were divided into six groups and received by gavage during gestation the following substances: Water (negative control), Olive Oil (vehicle control), Diethylstilbestrol (DES – positive control – 6.5μg/Kg bw), and BPA (40, 80 and 200μg/Kg bw). Male offspring were euthanized at 70 days of age and sperm parameters were analyzed. BPA reduced normal sperm morphology (water=96.1±0.65; BPA200=96.8±2.3%), sperm membrane integrity (water=88.8±1,65; BPA200=70.6±4,15%), sperm motility (water=87.5±1.71; BPA200= 51.3±9.9%) and in vitro penetration rates (water=55.0±7.14; BPA200=7.47±2.96%), but it did not affect body weight, anogenital distance, sperm DNA integrity and acrosome integrity. In conclusion, in utero exposure to BPA caused a reduction in sperm parameters of adult Calomys laucha. Natural mating studies should be conducted to verify the effects of BPA on fertility of the animals.

Transcript of Sperm impairments in adult vesper mice (Calomys laucha) caused by in utero exposure to bisphenol A

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    Sperm impairments in adult vesper mice (Calomys laucha)caused by in utero exposure to bisphenol AJ. Vilela1, A. Hartmann1, E. F. Silva2, T. Cardoso1, C. D. Corcini1,2, A. S. Varela-Junior1, P. E. Martinez1

    & E. P. Colares1

    1 Instituto de Cie^ncias Biologicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, RS, Brazil;

    2 ReproPel, Faculdade de Veterinaria, Campus Cap~ao do Le~ao, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil

    Keywords

    BisphenolCalomysendocrine disruptor

    reproductionsemen

    Correspondence

    Janice Vilela, Programa de Pos-Graduac~aoem Cie^ncias Fisiologicas: Fisiologia Animal

    Comparada - Instituto de Cie^ncias Biologicas,

    Universidade Federal de Rio Grande. Av. Italia

    km 8 Bairro Carreiros, Rio Grande,

    RS 96203-900, Brazil.

    Tel.: +55 (61) 8305 0527;

    Fax: +55 (53) 3233 6848;

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Accepted: September 9, 2013

    doi: 10.1111/and.12182

    Summary

    This study aimed to evaluate the effects of in utero administration of bisphenol A

    (BPA) on semen parameters of vesper mice. Sixty female Calomys laucha were

    divided into six groups and received by gavage during gestation the following sub-

    stances: Water (negative control), Olive Oil (vehicle control), Diethylstilbestrol

    (DES positive control 6.5 lg kg1 bw) and BPA (40, 80 and 200 lg kg1 bw).Male offspring were euthanised at 70 days of age, and sperm parameters were anal-

    ysed. BPA reduced normal sperm morphology (water = 96.1 0.65;BPA200 = 96.8 2.3%), sperm membrane integrity (water = 88.8 1,65; BPA200 = 70.6 4,15%), sperm motility (water = 87.5 1.71; BPA200 = 51.3 9.9%) and in vitro penetration rates (water = 55.0 7.14; BPA200 = 7.47 2.96%), but it did not affect body weight, anogenital distance, sperm DNA integ-

    rity and acrosome integrity. In conclusion, in utero exposure to BPA caused a

    reduction in sperm parameters of adult C. laucha. Natural mating studies should

    be conducted to verify the effects of BPA on fertility of the animals.

    Introduction

    It is well documented that several natural and man-made

    chemicals interfere with the hormonal system of vertebrate

    and invertebrate organisms (Pawlowski et al., 2004), acting

    as endocrine disruptors both directly, by binding to

    hormonal receptors, and indirectly, by modulating endoge-

    nous hormone levels, by interfering with biochemical

    processes associated with the production, availability or

    metabolism of hormones, or also by the modulation of

    receptors (Lagadic et al., 2007). One of them is bisphenol

    A (BPA), a substance used in the production of

    polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins which are used in

    manufacturing plastic containers, baby bottles and other

    products (Geens et al., 2012). This chemical was found to

    be an important endocrine disruptor that acts by mimick-

    ing estrogens (Welshons et al., 2006), and it has been

    detected in air, fresh and marine waters, soil and sediments

    (Rodriguez-Mozaz et al., 2005; Vandenberg et al., 2007; Fu

    & Kawamura, 2010; Flint et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012).

    Many studies have shown that mice perinatally exposed

    to BPA present impaired fertility (Toyama & Yuasa, 2004;

    Salian et al., 2009, 2011; LaRocca et al., 2011) as well as

    increased anogenital distance and reduced prostate size

    and epididymis weight (Gupta, 2000). Also, BPA has been

    reported reducing sperm count in rats that ingested 25

    and 100 ng kg1 (Al-Hiyasat et al., 2002); in humans,higher doses of urine BPA were related to lower sperm

    concentration and motility and higher sperm DNA

    damage (Meeker et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011).

    While most of the studies of BPA effects aim to

    extrapolate the results to human impacts, there are few

    studies concerning its effects on wildlife (Nieminen et al.,

    2002a,b). Evaluation of BPA exposure on mammals cur-

    rently relies on data from laboratory studies on model

    animals, such as mice and rats, and indicates many detri-

    mental effects on rodents at high levels of BPA. However,

    wildlife species may be exposed to chemicals at low doses

    and thus act as bioindicators for the effects of endocrine

    disruptors in natural ecosystems (Flint et al., 2012). The

    vesper mouse (Calomys laucha, Waterhouse 1837) is a

    small rodent found in South America (Reis et al., 2006)

    and it is of epidemiological relevance as a reservoir of

    Hantavirus and of protozoa pathogenic to humans (Mills

    2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH 1Andrologia 2013, xx, 18

  • et al., 1994). Its spermatozoon has a rounded head,

    similar to that of no rodent mammals, and their small

    size and rapid reproductive cycle are beneficial to experi-

    mental studies (Lasserre et al., 2000). Moreover, this

    species has some advantages over conventional rodents

    for toxicological studies because of its genetic variability

    and resistance to stressful agents (Vandenbergh, 2004).

    While the main source for human exposure to BPA is

    food and liquid storage containers, BPA is also released

    into the environment through sewage treatment effluent

    (via human-ingested BPA being eliminated through

    sewage), landfill leachate (via hydrolysis of BPA from

    plastics) and natural degradation of polycarbonate plastics

    (Crain et al., 2007). As vesper mouse lives on coasts, in

    pastures and along roadsides (Reis et al., 2006), this spe-

    cies may be affected by environmental sources of BPA.

    Since these animals still present wild characteristics, what

    is observed in captivity may be similar to what happens

    in wildlife. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the

    effects of in utero exposure to BPA on sperm parameters

    of adult Calomys laucha.

    Materials and methods

    Animal handling

    Animals were from the vivarium of nonconventional

    animals at the Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG),

    Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Animal collection and

    maintenance in captivity were approved by the Brazilian

    Institute for Environmental Protection (IBAMA, permit

    #14174-1). Animals used in this study were from F5 gen-

    eration kept in the vivarium. Parental crosses were from

    selected animals so as to prevent brothersister matings.The animals were individually housed in plastic boxes

    (35 9 20 9 13 cm), kept in an environment with

    controlled temperature (20.0 2.0 C) and photoperiod(LD 12:12, with light on at 6:00 a.m. and off at 6:00

    p.m.), and received soy-free diet and water ad libitum.

    Experimental design

    Sixty female Calomys laucha from 50 to 70 days old were

    kept with males to reproduce. As no alterations in vaginal

    swab were observed, after 5 days, males were separated

    and females were divided into six groups that received,

    by gavage, the following treatments: (i) 100 ll of water(Negative control Water); (ii) 100 ll of olive oil(vehicle control); (iii) 6.5 lg kg1 body weight (bw) ofdiethylstilbestrol (DES - positive control); (iv) 40 lgkg1 bw of BPA (BPA40); (v) 80 lg kg1 bw of BPA(BPA80); (vi) 200 lg kg1 bw of BPA (BPA200). Thevehicle for administration of DES and BPA was 100 ll of

    olive oil. The treatment was given daily from the day

    males were separated from females until parturition. After

    this period, treatment ceased and breastfeeding occurred

    normally.

    The current oral reference dose established by the US

    Environmental Protection Agency is 50 lg kg1 day1 forconsumption of BPA without deleterious effects

    (Vandenberg et al., 2007). For this study, therefore, the

    lowest dose of BPA was lower than this reference dose, and

    the highest dose was based on the lowest dose used in

    another study conducted by our group (300 lg kg1 datanot published). The oestrogenic potency of DES is 1001000 times higher than BPA (vom Saal & Welshons, 2006),

    so a lower dose of this substance was used.

    Pups were counted, weighed and sexed at birth. Their

    weight was gauged every 10 days until postnatal day

    (PND) 50. Anogenital distance was measured at birth and

    at PND 21. Males and females were euthanised by cervical

    dislocation on PND 70, after reaching full maturation of

    the reproductive tract. The procedures used for

    experimentation and euthanasia of the animals followed

    the recommendations of Brazilian law #6638 of May 8,

    1979, and also those of the US National Institute of

    Health guide for the use of laboratory animals (1996).

    Chemical substances were purchased from Sigma

    (St. Louis, MO, USA).

    Semen analyses

    Spermatozoa were collected after approaching the repro-

    ductive system by laparotomy. The cauda of both epi-

    didymes and part of the vas deferens were removed,

    ruptured with a 12 g 9 40 mm needle and placed in a

    35 mm Petri dish containing 200 ll of M2 medium withHEPES (M7167) (Corcini et al., 2012) for sperm dilution.

    Sperm quality evaluations were done as described below

    after incubation of samples for 10 min at 37 C in M2medium.

    For sperm motility evaluation, an aliquot (10 ll) con-taining spermatozoa was placed between a slide and a cover

    glass, and warmed at 37 C for further observation under aphase contrast optical microscope (Olympus BX 41-PH-III

    America INC, S~ao Paulo, Brazil). Sperm motility was

    reported as the average of three evaluations carried out by

    a trained technician using optical microscopy at 2009

    (Tayama et al., 2006) and expressed as percentage (0100%). Sperm morphology was determined after counting

    200 cells using phase contrast microscopy at 10009 (Tay-

    ama et al., 2006). Normal spermatozoa were counted, as

    well as defects of distal droplet, detached head and tucked

    tail. The number of sperm recovered from the epididymis

    was counted in a Neubauer chamber by calculating the

    concentration of spermatozoa per ml of medium.

    2 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbHAndrologia 2013, xx, 18

    Sperm damage in mice by in utero exposure to BPA J. Vilela et al.

  • Sperm DNA integrity, mitochondrial functionality,

    DNA integrity, sperm membrane integrity and acrosome

    integrity were held in an epifluorescence microscope

    (Olympus BX 51; America INC, S~ao Paulo, Brazil), with

    5 ll of solution with sperm under coverslip (18 918 mm), evaluating 200 cells per sample. Results were

    expressed in percentage of functional cells over total of

    evaluated cells. Sperm DNA integrity was evaluated with

    acridine orange gauge (Evenson & Jost, 2000). Sperm

    membrane integrity and acrosome integrity were evalu-

    ated at 4009 with 450520 nm filtre wavelength. Spermmembrane integrity was evaluated using carboxyfluoresce-

    in diacetate and propidium iodide (Harrison & Vickers,

    1990) and in each slide, 200 cells were counted and classi-

    fied as follows: intact (green fluorescence) or not intact

    (either red or simultaneous red and green fluorescence).

    Acrosome integrity was evaluated using FITC-PNA, after

    counting 200 cells in dry slides. Acrosomes were classified

    as follows: intact, when the sperm cell presented red fluo-

    rescence, the acrosome presented green fluorescence and

    the cells conformation was normal; or not intact, when

    the sperm cell presented red fluorescence but the acro-

    some was not evident or presented abnormal conforma-

    tion (Jimenez et al., 2003). Results were expressed as

    percentage of intact acrosome. Mitochondrial functional-

    ity was evaluated by fluorescent rhodamine 123 (Johnson

    et al., 1980).

    For the in vitro penetration (IVP) test, fresh oocytes were

    collected from the ovarium of prepubertal gilts obtained

    from a local abattoir. Oocytes were collected and pro-

    cessed; thirty oocytes were used for each sample and the

    test followed the protocol described by Corcini et al.

    (2012). Briefly, a M2 medium containing HEPES, 0.4%

    bovine serum albumin (A3311) and approximately

    2 9 106 spermatozoa per ml was used. Gametes were incu-

    bated in a water bath (37 C) for 2 h. Following incuba-tion, oocytes were collected, washed, stained with Hoescht

    33 342 (10 lg ml1) for 15 min at 38 C and thenobserved under an epifluorescence microscope (4009 mag-

    nification). Penetration rate (%) was calculated based on

    the relationship between the number of penetrated oocytes

    and the total number of oocytes per sample and per

    treatment. For each male, the number of penetrated

    oocytes and of spermatozoa per oocyte was counted.

    Statistics

    Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica 7.0

    software. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all eval-

    uated sperm variables. The continuous variables were

    tested for normal distribution with ShapiroWilk anddata were compared by the KruskalWallis H-test (Krus-kalWallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks) withmultiple comparisons of mean ranks for all groups (Siegel

    & Castellan, 1988).

    Results

    Of all sixty females, 41 sired litters. Mean birth weight

    was 1.6 0.1 g and there was no statistical differencebetween the groups. One animal from the BPA40 group

    was born dead and without three limbs (Fig. 1). Two ani-

    mals from the BPA80 group presented male genitals and

    female reproductive tract. No statistical differences were

    found for number of males and females and proportion

    of genders per treatment, which was 15.6 1.9 malesand 15.3 2.3 females (proportion 1:1). Number ofpups per litter also presented no statistical differences

    between the groups, with a mean of 3.8 0.31 femalesand 2.2 0.48 males. No statistical differences werefound for anogenital distance (AGD), which was

    3.48 0.06 mm.Spermatozoa were collected and analysed from a total

    of 71 males, 16 being from water group, 8 from olive oil,

    13 from DES, 15 from BPA40, 11 from BPA80 and 8

    from BPA200. Number of spermatozoa increased signifi-

    cantly in the olive oil group in relation to all other

    groups (P < 0.05). Values tended to be lower in DES andBPA groups (Fig. 2) in relation to vehicle group, despite

    being statistically equal to water group.

    Sperm DNA integrity and acrosome integrity are pre-

    sented in Table 1. No statistical differences were found

    (a) (b)

    Fig. 1 Newborn Calomys laucha from bisphe-

    nol A (BPA) 40 group without three limbs.

    2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH 3Andrologia 2013, xx, 18

    J. Vilela et al. Sperm damage in mice by in utero exposure to BPA

  • for DNA integrity, but the values tended to drop in the

    BPA200 group (P > 0.05). Acrosome integrity did notdiffer between vehicle group and treatment groups, but

    values were significantly higher in the water group.

    Normal sperm morphology was statistically reduced

    only in the BPA200 group (P < 0.05). Although defectsof morphology did not present statistical differences

    between groups, BPA200 showed higher values in distal

    droplets and detached head, while DES and BPA200 pre-

    sented more tucked tails than the other groups (Table 2).

    Sperm mitochondrial integrity, motility and sperm

    membrane integrity are presented in Table 3. Mitochon-

    drial integrity was statistically equal in the water and

    BPA40 groups and significantly lower (P < 0.05) in thevehicle, DES, BPA80 and BPA200 groups, which did not

    differ statistically from each other. Sperm motility was

    statistically reduced in BPA80 and BPA200 in relation to

    the other groups and membrane integrity was signifi-

    cantly reduced in BPA40 and BPA200 in relation to the

    other groups (P < 0.05).

    In vitro penetration rates were significantly reduced at

    all BPA concentrations (Fig. 3). Number of penetrating

    spermatozoa per oocyte was statistically lower only in the

    BPA200 group (Fig. 4).

    Discussion

    Bisphenol A has shown conflicting responses in different

    species and doses. It has been reported that litter size

    remained consistent across BPA (50 and 1000 lg kg1)treatment groups and the vehicle (sesame oil) in mice,

    but DES (5 lg kg1) decreased litter size both at birthand weaning (LaRocca et al., 2011). Studies have also

    reported that in utero administration of doses of BPA

    (0, 4 and 40 mg kg1 day1) through gavage had noeffects on growth and AGD of F1 rat offspring (Kobay-

    ashi et al., 2002). Contrary to these observations, another

    study reported that in utero administration of doses of

    BPA (50 lg kg1 day1) through diet increased AGD inCD-1 mice offspring (Gupta, 2000). In this study, results

    showed that in utero exposure to BPA and DES did not

    affect litter size, weight of animals or the AGD. Discrep-

    ancies between the results may be because of differences

    Fig. 2 Number of spermatozoa for Calomys laucha exposed in utero

    to water, olive oil, Diethylstilbestrol (DES) (6.5 lg kg1) and bisphenolA (BPA) (40, 80 and 200 lg kg1) (N = 71). Data expressed asMean SE. Values followed by different letters differ significantly byKruskalWallis test (P < 0.05).

    Table 1 Sperm DNA integrity and acrosome integrity for Calomys

    laucha exposed in utero to water, olive oil, Diethylstilbestrol (DES)

    (6.5 lg kg1) and bisphenol A (BPA) (40, 80 and 200 lg kg1)(N = 71)

    Treatment DNA Acrosome

    Water 97.9 0.73a 89.6 2.24aOlive Oil 95.4 2.01a 50.0 2.38bDES 91.0 4.12a 43.6 4.08bBPA40 85.1 6.19a 48.1 3.29bBPA80 90.5 4.23a 48.7 2.52bBPA200 89.5 3.06a 49.2 2.71b

    Results are expressed as Mean of percentage SE. Values followedby different letters in the same column differ significantly by Kruskal

    Wallis test (P < 0.05).

    Table 2 Sperm morphology for Calomys laucha exposed in utero to

    water, olive oil, Diethylstilbestrol (DES) (6.5 lg kg1) and bisphenol A(BPA) (40, 80 and 200 lg kg1) (N = 71)

    Treatment Normal

    Distal

    droplet

    Detached

    head

    Tucked

    Tail

    Water 96.1 0.65a 1.1 0.38a 1.0 0.25a 2.0 0.59aOlive Oil 96.0 0.86a 1.8 0.89a 1.1 0.32a 0.9 0.49aDES 94.5 0.98a 1.3 0.42a 0.7 0.49a 4.0 0.96aBPA40 93.7 1.50a 1.5 0.61a 1.4 0.41a 3.4 1.64aBPA80 94.6 1.08a 1.1 0.30a 1.0 0.43a 3.9 1.12aBPA200 90.8 2.30b 3.8 1.01a 2.7 0.84a 4.4 2.93a

    Data expressed as Mean of percentage SE. Values followed by dif-ferent letters in the same column differ significantly by KruskalWallis

    test (P < 0.05).

    Table 3 Sperm mitochondrial integrity (Mit). motility and membrane

    integrity (Mem) for Calomys laucha exposed in utero to water, olive

    oil, Diethylstilbestrol (DES) (6.5 lg kg1) and bisphenol A (BPA) (40,80 and 200 lg kg1) (N = 71)

    Treatment Mit Motility Mem

    Water 92.8 1.71a 87.5 1.71a 88.8 1.65aOlive Oil 35.2 6.24b 65.7 13.43a 77.2 3.63aDES 35.8 7.09b 78.8 2.27a 55.9 13.85aBPA40 61.8 9.20a 79.2 2.60a 65.5 5.09bBPA80 58.6 6.89b 61.8 7.11b 74.6 4.14aBPA200 56.1 7.20b 51.3 9.90b 70.6 4.15b

    Data expressed as Mean of percentage SE. Values followed by dif-ferent letters differ significantly by Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05).

    4 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbHAndrologia 2013, xx, 18

    Sperm damage in mice by in utero exposure to BPA J. Vilela et al.

  • among species and route and vehicle of administration of

    the substances.

    It is known that in utero exposure of DES in women is

    a cause of several anatomical and functional disorders of

    the genital tract (Laurent et al., 1998). In this study,

    although neither BPA nor DES affected AGD, it was

    observed that only 3 females that received DES by gavage

    sired a litter, while this number was much higher in the

    other groups. The dose of 6.5 lg kg1 of DES given tothe females may have caused anatomical, functional or

    hormonal disorders. To verify this hypothesis, uteri of all

    the female breeders and their litters were collected for

    future histological analyses.

    Studies indicate that BPA exposure results in perma-

    nent alterations in androgen-target tissues (Maffini et al.,

    2006). Corroborating this hypothesis, an increase in pros-

    tate duct volume (Timms et al., 2005), enlarged prostates

    and decreased epididymal weight (Gupta, 2000) have

    been previously reported in mice. In this study,

    80 lg kg1 of BPA induced malformation of the repro-ductive system; additionally, 40 lg kg1 of BPA induced

    limb malformation in one animal. Other studies have

    reported teratogenic effects of BPA in Xenopus laevis

    (Iwamuro et al., 2003) and early mice embryos in vitro

    (Pei et al., 2003), but this study demonstrates that doses

    lower than that accepted by the US Environmental

    Protection Agency may cause death and malformation in

    foetuses of rodents.

    Sperm DNA integrity has been shown to reduce in a

    doseresponse manner with urinary BPA in men (Meekeret al., 2010). It has also been reported that in utero expo-

    sure to endocrine disruptors influences the embryonic

    testis and causes epigenetic effects such as DNA methyla-

    tion, resulting in abnormal germ-cell differentiation that

    influences adult spermatogenic capacity and male fertility

    in rats (Lenzi et al., 1996). The doses used in this study

    did not affect sperm DNA, but BPA tended to reduce

    DNA integrity, so it is possible that higher doses may

    cause a significant decrease in this parameter.

    The effect of olive oil on acrosome integrity, mitochon-

    drial integrity and increasing number of sperm lead us to

    question whether olive oil was the best vehicle for admin-

    istration of BPA. Many genes involved in fatty acid

    metabolism are regulated by a family of three members of

    the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

    (PPARs), which regulate glucose homeostasis, lipid

    metabolism and inflammation. There is indication that

    oleic, linoleic and palmitic acids, which are present in

    the olive oil, are ligands of PPARs (revised by Kaput

    & Rodriguez, 2004). Since most studies do not compare

    vehicle treatment with negative control (water),

    comparing only treatment with BPA and other oestrogenic

    compounds and the vehicle used (Nagao et al., 1999;

    Kobayashi et al., 2002; Toyama & Yuasa, 2004; Salian

    et al., 2009; LaRocca et al., 2011), our study may provide

    new information about the use of oily vehicles for

    administration of BPA, which may in fact protect the

    cells against the epigenetic effect of BPA. Moreover, in

    spite of the improving effects of olive oil, BPA still caused

    a reduction in sperm parameters, indicating its inhibiting

    effect. Sperm morphological abnormalities have been

    reported in rats prenatally exposed to BPA, which

    presented cytoplasmic droplets in the mid-piece, principal

    and head regions of the spermatozoa (Salian et al., 2009).

    In this study, droplets were found in the distal region of

    the cell. However, these abnormalities may not impair

    C. laucha reproduction, since normal sperm morphology

    of this species has been reported by Corcini et al. (2012)

    to be equal to 90.2 6.6%, which is lower than theBPA200 group in this study. Sperm motility has also been

    shown to decrease in rats perinatally exposed to BPA

    (Salian et al., 2009), and lower motility related to urinary

    BPA in a doseresponse manner in men has beenreported (Li et al., 2011). Corroborating these findings, in

    Fig. 3 In vitro penetration (IVP) rates for Calomys laucha exposed in

    utero to water, olive oil, Diethylstilbestrol (DES) (6.5 lg kg1) andbisphenol A (BPA) (40, 80 and 200 lg kg1) (N = 71). Data expressedas Mean of percentage SE. Values followed by different lettersdiffer significantly by KruskalWallis test (P < 0.05).

    Fig. 4 Number of penetrating spermatozoa per oocyte for Calomys

    laucha exposed in utero to water, olive oil, Diethylstilbestrol (DES)

    (6.5 lg kg1) and bisphenol A (BPA) (40, 80 and 200 lg kg1)(N = 71). Data expressed as Mean SE. Values followed by differentletters differ significantly by KruskalWallis test (P < 0.05).

    2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH 5Andrologia 2013, xx, 18

    J. Vilela et al. Sperm damage in mice by in utero exposure to BPA

  • this study, sperm motility was significantly decreased in

    groups BPA80 and BPA200 in relation to water and olive

    oil.

    The effect of BPA on plasma membrane integrity is

    demonstrated for the first time in this study. Our results

    for the water group were similar to those found by Cor-

    cini et al. (2012), who studied in vitro assays for vesper

    mice sperm and reported normal membrane integrity as

    88.7 9.6% for C. laucha.All the parameters discussed above may influence the

    IVP test. The IVP test presents high specificity, detecting

    sub-fertile males unable to sire a litter after natural mat-

    ing by detecting those failing to penetrate swine oocytes

    in vitro (Corcini et al., 2012). Since C. laucha sperm head

    morphology is similar to that of other mammals (Lasserre

    et al., 2000), it has been shown that porcine oocytes are

    useful heterologous substrates for in vitro fertilisation

    studies of this species (Lasserre et al., 2000; Corcini et al.,

    2012). This is the first study of IVP rates related to BPA.

    In this study, BPA significantly reduced penetration rates

    at all doses given. However, the reason for this reduction

    in IVP rates could not be determined. As heterologous

    oocytes were used, it is possible that BPA affected an

    important factor for the spermatozoa to penetrate the

    oocyte that was not analysed in this study. Corcini et al.

    (2012) found IVP rates for C. laucha equal to 39.8%,

    which is lower than our control groups, but higher than

    treatment groups. However, to confirm the reduction of

    fertility by BPA and DES, natural mating studies need to

    be performed.

    The mechanisms of action of BPA are not fully under-

    stood. The adverse effects of BPA on sperm parameters

    may be due to a direct effect on the testes, acting as an

    androgen receptor (AR) antagonist that interrupts normal

    AR binding activity (Wetherill et al., 2007). Also, BPA

    may alter spermatogenesis by disrupting the hypothala-

    muspituitarytestes axis, altering the function of Leydigcells and reducing testosterone biosynthesis (Takao et al.,

    2003).

    This study shows that prenatal exposure to BPA causes

    permanent alterations in semen quality of C. laucha,

    while other studies show that effects of adult and perina-

    tal administration of BPA are transitory (Nagao et al.,

    1999; Kuwada et al., 2002; Toyama & Yuasa, 2004). The

    differences between in utero and perinatal administration

    of BPA may occur because in utero exposure to BPA

    affects the developing testes, thus affecting germ cells,

    while perinatal exposure affects the already formed organ.

    Another important observation in this study is that

    most of the parameters were affected only by the highest

    dose of BPA. Thus, data suggest C. laucha is more resis-

    tant to low doses of BPA than other rodents; this may be

    because wild species present higher genetic variability,

    making them more resistant to a series of infectious and

    stressful agents.

    In conclusion, it is shown for the first time in vivo that

    low doses of BPA may cause malformation of foetuses.

    In utero exposure to high doses of BPA permanently

    reduced normal sperm morphology, sperm membrane

    integrity, sperm motility and IVP rates of adult C. laucha

    males. This species may act as a bioindicator of BPA pol-

    lution in natural environments. Natural mating experi-

    ments must be conducted to confirm whether these

    alterations reduce the fertility of the animals.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank the ReproPel team from the University of Pelo-

    tas for help with the semen analyses and CAPES (Coorde-

    nac~ao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nvel Superior,Braslia, DF, Brazil) for financial support.

    References

    Al-Hiyasat AS, Darmani H, Elbetieha AM (2002) Effects of

    bisphenol A on adult male mouse fertility. Eur J Oral Sci

    110:163167.

    Corcini CD, Stephan MHL, Colares EP, Santos ECS, Varela

    AS, Bongalhardo DC, Lucia T (2012) In vitro assays for

    vesper mice (Calomys laucha) sperm using heterologous

    substrates from nonrodent species. J Exp Zool A 317:96102.

    Crain DA, Eriksen M, Iguchi T, Jobling S, Laufer H, LeBlanc

    GA, Guillette LJ Jr (2007) An ecological assessment of

    bisphenol-A: evidence from comparative biology. Reprod

    Toxicol 24:225239.

    Evenson D, Jost L (2000) Sperm chromatin structure assay is

    useful for fertility assessment. Meth Cell Sci 22:169189.

    Flint S, Markle T, Thompson S, Wallace E (2012) Bisphenol A

    exposure, effects, and policy: a wildlife perspective. J Environ

    Manage 104:1934.

    Fu P, Kawamura K (2010) Ubiquity of bisphenol A in the

    atmosphere. Environ Pollut 158:31383143.

    Geens T, Aerts D, Berthot C, Bourguignon JP, Goeyens L,

    Lecomte P, Maghuin-Rogister G, Pironnet AM, Pussemier

    L, Scippo ML, Van Loco J, Covaci A (2012) A review of

    dietary and non-dietary exposure to bisphenol-A. Food

    Chem Toxicol 50:37253740.

    Gupta C (2000) Reproductive malformation of the male

    offspring following maternal exposure to estrogenic

    chemicals. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 224:6168.

    Harrison RAP, Vickers SE (1990) Use of fluorescent probes to

    assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa.

    J Reprod Fertil 88:343352.

    Huang YQ, Wong CK, Zheng JS, Bouwman H, Barra R,

    Wahlstrom B, Neretin L, Wong MH (2012) Bisphenol A

    (BPA) in China: a review of sources, environmental levels,

    and potential human health impacts. Environ Int 42:9199.

    6 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbHAndrologia 2013, xx, 18

    Sperm damage in mice by in utero exposure to BPA J. Vilela et al.

  • Iwamuro S, Sakakibara M, Terao M, Ozawa A, Kurobe C,

    Shigeura T, Kato M, Kikuyama S (2003) Teratogenic and

    anti-metamorphic effects of bisphenol A on embryonic and

    larval Xenopus laevis. Gen Comp Endocr 133:189198.

    Jimenez I, Gonzalez-Marquez H, Ortiz R, Herrera JA, Garcii

    A, Betancourt M, Fierro R (2003) Changes in the

    distribution of lectin receptors during capacitation and

    acrosome reaction in boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology

    59:11711180.

    Johnson LV, Walsh ML, Chen LB (1980) Localization of

    mitochondria in living cells with rhodamine 123. Proc Nat

    Acad Sci USA 77:990994.

    Kaput J, Rodriguez RL (2004) Nutritional genomics: the next

    frontier in the postgenomic era. Physiol Genom 16:166177.

    Kobayashi K, Miyagawa M, Wang RS, Sekiguchi S, Suda M,

    Honma T (2002) Effects of in utero and lactational

    exposure to bisphenol A on somatic growth and anogenital

    distance in F1 rat offspring. Ind Health 40:375381.

    Kuwada M, Kawashima R, Nakamura K, Kojima H, Hasumi H,

    Maki J, Sugano S (2002) Neonatal exposure to endocrine

    disruptors suppresses juvenile testis weight and

    steroidogenesis but spermatogenesis is considerably restored

    during puberty. Biochem Biophysl Res commun 295:193197.

    Lagadic L, Coutellec M-A, Caquet T (2007) Endocrine

    disruption in aquatic pulmonate molluscs: few evidences,

    many challenges. Ecotoxicology 16:4559.

    LaRocca J, Boyajian A, Brown C, Smith SD, Hixon M (2011)

    Effects of in utero exposure to Bisphenol A or

    diethylstilbestrol on the adult male reproductive system.

    Birth defects research Part B. Dev Reprod Toxicol 92:526

    533.

    Lasserre A, Cebral E, Vitullo AD (2000) Successful

    capacitation and homologous fertilization in vitro in

    Calomys musculinus and Calomys laucha (Rodentia -

    sigmodontinae). J Reprod Fertil 120:4147.

    Laurent S, Lanoue M, Lecomte C, Bourgeois L, Lecomte P

    (1998) Female fertility prognosis and diethylstilbestrol.

    Personal data and review of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet

    Biol Reprod 27:277284.

    Lenzi A, Picardo M, Gandini L, Dondero F (1996) Lipids of

    the sperm plasma membrane: from polyunsaturated fatty

    acids considered as markers of sperm function to possible

    scavenger therapy. Hum Reprod Update 2:246256.

    Li DK, Zhou Z, Miao M, He Y, Wang J, Ferber J, Herrinton

    LJ, Gao E, Yuan W (2011) Urine bisphenol-A (BPA) level in

    relation to semen quality. Fertil Steril 95:e621e624.

    Maffini MV, Rubin BS, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM (2006)

    Endocrine disruptors and reproductive health: the case of

    bisphenol-A. Mol Cell Endocrinol 254255:179186.

    Meeker JD, Ehrlich S, Toth TL, Wright DL, Calafat AM,

    Trisini AT, Ye X, Hauser R (2010) Semen quality and sperm

    DNA damage in relation to urinary bisphenol A among

    men from an infertility clinic. Reprod Toxicol 30:532539.

    Mills JN, Ellis BA, Childs JE, McKee KT Jr, Maiztegui JI,

    Peters CJ, Ksiazek TG, Jahrling PB (1994) Prevalence of

    infection with Junin virus in rodent populations in the

    epidemic area of Argentine hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop

    Med Hyg 51:554562.

    Nagao T, Saito Y, Usumi K, Kuwagata M, Imai K (1999)

    Reproductive function in rats exposed neonatally to bisphenol

    A and estradiol benzoate. Reprod Toxicol 13:303311.

    Nieminen P, Lindstrom-Seppa P, Juntunen M, Asikainen J,

    Mustonen AM, Karonen SL, Mussalo-Rauhamaa H,

    Kukkonen JV (2002a) In vivo effects of bisphenol A on the

    polecat (mustela putorius). J Toxicol Environ Health A

    65:933945.

    Nieminen P, Lindstrom-Seppa P, Mustonen AM, Mussalo-

    Rauhamaa H, Kukkonen JV (2002b) Bisphenol A affects

    endocrine physiology and biotransformation enzyme

    activities of the field vole (Microtus agrestis). Gen Comp

    Endocr 126:183189.

    Pawlowski S, Ternes TA, Bonerz M, Rastall AC, Erdinger L,

    Braunbeck T (2004) Estrogenicity of solid phase-extracted

    water samples from two municipal sewage treatment plant

    effluents and river Rhine water using the yeast estrogen

    screen. Toxicol In Vitro 18:129138.

    Pei XR, Li Y, Long DX, Chen X, Gao LF, Chen XG (2003) In

    vitro study of bisphenol-A toxicity on the early embryo

    development of mice. Chin J Reprod Health 14:3437.

    Reis NR, Peracchi AL, Pedro WA, Lima IP (2006) Mamferos

    do Brasil. Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina.

    Rodriguez-Mozaz S, de Alda ML, Barcelo D (2005) Analysis of

    bisphenol A in natural waters by means of an optical

    immunosensor. Water Res 39:5079.

    vom Saal FS, Welshons WV (2006) Large effects from small

    exposures. II. The importance of positive controls in low-

    dose research on bisphenol A. Environ Res 100:5076.

    Salian S, Doshi T, Vanage G (2009) Perinatal exposure of rats

    to Bisphenol A affects the fertility of male offspring. Life Sci

    85:742752.

    Salian S, Doshi T, Vanage G (2011) Perinatal exposure of rats

    to Bisphenol A affects fertility of male offspringan

    overview. Reprod Toxicol 31:359362.

    Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the

    Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Takao T, Nanamiya W, Nazarloo HP, Matsumoto R, Asaba K,

    Hashimoto K (2003) Exposure to the environmental

    estrogen bisphenol A differentially modulated estrogen

    receptor-alpha and -beta immunoreactivity and mRNA in

    male mouse testis. Life Sci 72:11591169.

    Tayama K, Fujita H, Takahashi H, Nagasawa A, Yano N,

    Yuzawa K, Ogata A (2006) Measuring mouse sperm

    parameters using a particle counter and sperm quality

    analyzer: a simple and inexpensive method. Reprod Toxicol

    22:92101.

    Timms BG, Howdeshell KL, Barton L, Bradley S, Richter CA,

    vom Saal FS (2005) Estrogenic chemicals in plastic and oral

    contraceptives disrupt development of the fetal mouse

    prostate and urethra. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7014

    7019.

    2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH 7Andrologia 2013, xx, 18

    J. Vilela et al. Sperm damage in mice by in utero exposure to BPA

  • Toyama Y, Yuasa S (2004) Effects of neonatal administration

    of 17b-estradiol, bestradiol 3-benzoate, or bisphenol A onmouse and rat spermatogenesis. Reprod Toxicol 19:181188.

    Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV

    (2007) Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod

    Toxicol 24:139177.

    Vandenbergh JG (2004) Animal models and studies of in

    utero endocrine disruptor effects. ILAR J 45:438442.

    Welshons WV, Nagel SC, vom Saal FS (2006) Large effects

    from small exposures. III. Endocrine mechanisms mediating

    effects of bisphenol A at levels of human exposure.

    Endocrinology 147:S56S69.

    Wetherill YB, Akingbemi BT, Kanno J, McLachlan JA, Nadal

    A, Sonnenschein C, Watson CS, Zoeller RT, Belcher SM

    (2007) In vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A

    action. Reprod Toxicol 24:178198.

    8 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbHAndrologia 2013, xx, 18

    Sperm damage in mice by in utero exposure to BPA J. Vilela et al.