Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn...

18
Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona State University
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    215
  • download

    0

Transcript of Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn...

Page 1: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

Specifications & Curriculum Customization

Barry McNeillVice Chair Mechanical EngineeringandLynn Bellamy and Veronica BurrowsChemical EngineeringArizona State University

Page 2: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

2McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Overview of Presentation Four Questions To Answer When Defining a

Curriculum The Role of Specifications Relative to the

Four Questions Taxonomies of Learning Specifying a Curriculum Using an Articulation

Matrix Specifying a Course (Learning Module) Using

a Competency Matrix

Page 3: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

3McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Four Questions in Defining a Curriculum (Ralph Tyler) What educational purposes should the

school/program seek to attain? What educational experiences can be

provided that are likely to attain these purposes?

How can these educational experiences be effectively organized?

How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained?

Page 4: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

4McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Specifications and Educational Purpose (Question 1)

In design a specification is a performance metric with an assigned value

In curriculum design a specification is a program outcome with a desired level of mastery (e.g., solve first order ODE’s)

A set of specifications quantify (define) a Program’s Purpose

Page 5: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

5McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Program Graduates

Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes

Desired State

Page 6: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

6McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Specifications and Educational Experiences (Question 2) If you know the desired state (a program

specification) and If you know a student’s present state (current

or initial level of mastery for the metric) It is possible to define a set of learning

experiences that will move the student from the present state to the desired state

The set of experiences defines a program curriculum

Page 7: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

7McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

The Impact of a Curriculum

Students arrive with a variety of skills and attitudes

Present State

Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes

Desired State

Curriculum

The Path

...

Page 8: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

8McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Specifications and Experience Organization (Question 3) There are many ways to bundle the learning

experiences together A set of bundled experiences defines a

course It often happens that the movement from the

present state to the desired state takes several courses

When several courses are involved in achieving the desired state it is important to know the specifications for each course

Page 9: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

9McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Traditional Education Process

Present State Desired StateThe Path

Every student takes the same path

Students arrive with a variety of skills and attitudes

Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes

Page 10: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

10McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Specifications and Assessment (Question 4)

Assessment is possible when you have specifications

A program specification sets a measurable standard for benchmarking a student’s performance

The benchmarking can be done by the student, the faculty, or an independent assessor

Page 11: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

11McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Customized Education Process

Present State Desired StateThe Path

Each student takes a customized path

Students arrive with a variety of skills and attitudes

Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes

Page 12: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

12McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Customized Education Process

Present State Desired StateThe Path

Each student takes a customized path

Students arrive with a variety of skills and attitudes

Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes

Page 13: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

13McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Specifications Some SourcesEducational Metrics

ABET’s a through k Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Special constituency needs

Educational Value Bloom’s Taxonomy Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy SOLO Taxonomy (Biggs & Collis) Program Defined Taxonomy

Page 14: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

14McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Howard Gardner’s Multiple IntelligencesLinguisticLogical-

MathematicalSpatialBodily-Kinesthetic

Musical Interpersonal IntrapersonalNaturalist (Existential,

possible candidate)

Page 15: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

15McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Bloom’s Levels of Learning

Original Taxonomy Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation

Revised Taxonomy Cognitive Processes

Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

Knowledge Types Factual Conceptual Procedural Meta-cognitive

Page 16: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

Sample Program Articulation Matrix

Objectives (gray), Outcomes (aquamarine),

Competency Areas (yellow), Competencies

(white) Le

ve

l of

Le

arn

ing

(in

)L

ev

el o

f L

ea

rnin

g (

ou

t)E

ng

lish

Ge

ne

ral S

tud

ies

Eco

n

Ch

em

istry

Ph

ysic

s (M

EC

Ph

ysic

s La

b 1

22

& 1

32

Mo

de

rn P

hys

ics

36

1

Ca

lcu

lus

27

0, 2

71

& 2

72

DifE

Q M

ath

27

4

Lin

ea

r A

lge

bra

Ma

t 24

2

Intr

o to

Eng

r E

CE

10

0

Ele

c N

etw

ork

s E

CE

20

1

Sta

tics

EC

E 2

10

Dyn

am

ics

EC

E 2

12

Inte

rm D

esig

n E

CE

30

0

Intr

o D

ef S

olid

s E

CE

31

3

Th

erm

ody

na

mic

s E

CE

34

0

Str

uct

/Pro

p M

atls

EC

E 3

50

Nu

me

rica

l Me

tho

ds

EC

E 3

84

Dyn

Sys

/Co

ntr

ols

MA

E 3

17

Msr

mn

ts &

Da

ta A

nly

MA

E 3

19

Flu

id M

ech

an

ics

MA

E 3

71

He

at T

rans

fer

MA

E 3

88

Me

cha

nic

s o

f Ma

tls M

AE

422

Pri

nci

pa

ls o

f De

s M

AE

44

1

En

g D

esi

gn

MA

E 4

43

Exp

Me

cha

nic

al E

ng

r M

AE

49

1

Pro

/De

s/D

ev

MA

E 4

90

1.1 Fund Math & Science R Ap1.1.1. calculus Ap Ap Ap U U U K U Ap Ap Ap Ap Ap Ap Ap

1.1.1.1 analytical solution of ODEs U U P P

1.1.1.2 Laplace transforms An An Co

1.1.1.3 Fourier transforms Ap Ap

1.1.1.4 finite statistics (probability) An R An P P

1.1.1.5 integrate algebraic & trigonometric functions

U P P U P P P

1.1.1.6 differentiate algebraic & trigonometric functions

U P P U P P

1.1.1.7 vector operations U U P U U P

1.1.1.8 matrix manipulation U U P

1.1.1.9 multivariable manipulations U P

1 Technical Competency

16McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Page 17: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

Sample Articulation Matrix

Learning Objectives

Le

ve

l o

f L

ea

rnin

g C

ou

rse

Ac

tiv

itie

s

In C

las

s A

cti

vit

ies

take

quiz

zes/e

xam

s be

fore

cla

ss

activ

e le

arn

ing e

xerc

ises

constr

uct m

ath

em

atic

al m

odels

ora

lly r

eport

to p

eers

and c

lass

peer

assess d

esig

n n

ote

books

w

ork

on d

esig

n p

roje

cts

w

atc

h m

anufa

ctu

ring/o

ther

vid

eos

lis

ten to b

rief

lectu

res

Ou

t o

f C

las

s A

cti

vit

ies

re

ad a

nd s

um

marize textb

ooks

1. Engineering Design Process Ap

1.1 formulating the problem R U U U R R

1.2 solving a problem R U U U R R

1.3 implementing a solution R U U U R R

1.4 documenting the process R U U U R R

1.5 using engineering/physical principles R

1.6 using quality principles R U U U R R

2 Working in Teams U

2.1 team dynamics R U U R R

2.2 team communication R U U R R

2.3 social norms R U U R R

2.4 conflict management R U U R R

3 Engineering As A Profession R

3.1 the profession R R

3.2 selection of a major R

3.3 professional ethics R U R R

4 Planning For Success U

4.1 personal career planning R

4.2 learning to learn R R

4.3 assessment of progress U U R R

4.4 time management K U R R

17McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Page 18: Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn Bellamy and Veronica Burrows Chemical Engineering Arizona.

18McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002

Summary of Presentation Four questions to answer when defining a

curriculum were presented The impact of specifications relative to the

four questions was presented Several taxonomies of learning including

Bloom’s taxonomy were presented Two examples showed how to define a

program/course using specifications