Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Specifications & Curriculum Customization Barry McNeill Vice Chair Mechanical Engineering and Lynn...
Specifications & Curriculum Customization
Barry McNeillVice Chair Mechanical EngineeringandLynn Bellamy and Veronica BurrowsChemical EngineeringArizona State University
2McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Overview of Presentation Four Questions To Answer When Defining a
Curriculum The Role of Specifications Relative to the
Four Questions Taxonomies of Learning Specifying a Curriculum Using an Articulation
Matrix Specifying a Course (Learning Module) Using
a Competency Matrix
3McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Four Questions in Defining a Curriculum (Ralph Tyler) What educational purposes should the
school/program seek to attain? What educational experiences can be
provided that are likely to attain these purposes?
How can these educational experiences be effectively organized?
How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained?
4McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Specifications and Educational Purpose (Question 1)
In design a specification is a performance metric with an assigned value
In curriculum design a specification is a program outcome with a desired level of mastery (e.g., solve first order ODE’s)
A set of specifications quantify (define) a Program’s Purpose
5McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Program Graduates
Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes
Desired State
6McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Specifications and Educational Experiences (Question 2) If you know the desired state (a program
specification) and If you know a student’s present state (current
or initial level of mastery for the metric) It is possible to define a set of learning
experiences that will move the student from the present state to the desired state
The set of experiences defines a program curriculum
7McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
The Impact of a Curriculum
Students arrive with a variety of skills and attitudes
Present State
Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes
Desired State
Curriculum
The Path
...
8McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Specifications and Experience Organization (Question 3) There are many ways to bundle the learning
experiences together A set of bundled experiences defines a
course It often happens that the movement from the
present state to the desired state takes several courses
When several courses are involved in achieving the desired state it is important to know the specifications for each course
9McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Traditional Education Process
Present State Desired StateThe Path
Every student takes the same path
Students arrive with a variety of skills and attitudes
Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes
10McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Specifications and Assessment (Question 4)
Assessment is possible when you have specifications
A program specification sets a measurable standard for benchmarking a student’s performance
The benchmarking can be done by the student, the faculty, or an independent assessor
11McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Customized Education Process
Present State Desired StateThe Path
Each student takes a customized path
Students arrive with a variety of skills and attitudes
Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes
12McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Customized Education Process
Present State Desired StateThe Path
Each student takes a customized path
Students arrive with a variety of skills and attitudes
Students leave demonstrating mastery of all required outcomes
13McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Specifications Some SourcesEducational Metrics
ABET’s a through k Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Special constituency needs
Educational Value Bloom’s Taxonomy Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy SOLO Taxonomy (Biggs & Collis) Program Defined Taxonomy
14McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Howard Gardner’s Multiple IntelligencesLinguisticLogical-
MathematicalSpatialBodily-Kinesthetic
Musical Interpersonal IntrapersonalNaturalist (Existential,
possible candidate)
15McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Bloom’s Levels of Learning
Original Taxonomy Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation
Revised Taxonomy Cognitive Processes
Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create
Knowledge Types Factual Conceptual Procedural Meta-cognitive
Sample Program Articulation Matrix
Objectives (gray), Outcomes (aquamarine),
Competency Areas (yellow), Competencies
(white) Le
ve
l of
Le
arn
ing
(in
)L
ev
el o
f L
ea
rnin
g (
ou
t)E
ng
lish
Ge
ne
ral S
tud
ies
Eco
n
Ch
em
istry
Ph
ysic
s (M
EC
Ph
ysic
s La
b 1
22
& 1
32
Mo
de
rn P
hys
ics
36
1
Ca
lcu
lus
27
0, 2
71
& 2
72
DifE
Q M
ath
27
4
Lin
ea
r A
lge
bra
Ma
t 24
2
Intr
o to
Eng
r E
CE
10
0
Ele
c N
etw
ork
s E
CE
20
1
Sta
tics
EC
E 2
10
Dyn
am
ics
EC
E 2
12
Inte
rm D
esig
n E
CE
30
0
Intr
o D
ef S
olid
s E
CE
31
3
Th
erm
ody
na
mic
s E
CE
34
0
Str
uct
/Pro
p M
atls
EC
E 3
50
Nu
me
rica
l Me
tho
ds
EC
E 3
84
Dyn
Sys
/Co
ntr
ols
MA
E 3
17
Msr
mn
ts &
Da
ta A
nly
MA
E 3
19
Flu
id M
ech
an
ics
MA
E 3
71
He
at T
rans
fer
MA
E 3
88
Me
cha
nic
s o
f Ma
tls M
AE
422
Pri
nci
pa
ls o
f De
s M
AE
44
1
En
g D
esi
gn
MA
E 4
43
Exp
Me
cha
nic
al E
ng
r M
AE
49
1
Pro
/De
s/D
ev
MA
E 4
90
1.1 Fund Math & Science R Ap1.1.1. calculus Ap Ap Ap U U U K U Ap Ap Ap Ap Ap Ap Ap
1.1.1.1 analytical solution of ODEs U U P P
1.1.1.2 Laplace transforms An An Co
1.1.1.3 Fourier transforms Ap Ap
1.1.1.4 finite statistics (probability) An R An P P
1.1.1.5 integrate algebraic & trigonometric functions
U P P U P P P
1.1.1.6 differentiate algebraic & trigonometric functions
U P P U P P
1.1.1.7 vector operations U U P U U P
1.1.1.8 matrix manipulation U U P
1.1.1.9 multivariable manipulations U P
1 Technical Competency
16McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Sample Articulation Matrix
Learning Objectives
Le
ve
l o
f L
ea
rnin
g C
ou
rse
Ac
tiv
itie
s
In C
las
s A
cti
vit
ies
take
quiz
zes/e
xam
s be
fore
cla
ss
activ
e le
arn
ing e
xerc
ises
constr
uct m
ath
em
atic
al m
odels
ora
lly r
eport
to p
eers
and c
lass
peer
assess d
esig
n n
ote
books
w
ork
on d
esig
n p
roje
cts
w
atc
h m
anufa
ctu
ring/o
ther
vid
eos
lis
ten to b
rief
lectu
res
Ou
t o
f C
las
s A
cti
vit
ies
re
ad a
nd s
um
marize textb
ooks
1. Engineering Design Process Ap
1.1 formulating the problem R U U U R R
1.2 solving a problem R U U U R R
1.3 implementing a solution R U U U R R
1.4 documenting the process R U U U R R
1.5 using engineering/physical principles R
1.6 using quality principles R U U U R R
2 Working in Teams U
2.1 team dynamics R U U R R
2.2 team communication R U U R R
2.3 social norms R U U R R
2.4 conflict management R U U R R
3 Engineering As A Profession R
3.1 the profession R R
3.2 selection of a major R
3.3 professional ethics R U R R
4 Planning For Success U
4.1 personal career planning R
4.2 learning to learn R R
4.3 assessment of progress U U R R
4.4 time management K U R R
17McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
18McNeill ASU - ASME Clearwater Beach April 2002
Summary of Presentation Four questions to answer when defining a
curriculum were presented The impact of specifications relative to the
four questions was presented Several taxonomies of learning including
Bloom’s taxonomy were presented Two examples showed how to define a
program/course using specifications