Special Talking ASEAN on Infrastructure 12 November...
Transcript of Special Talking ASEAN on Infrastructure 12 November...
Special Talking ASEAN on Infrastructure
12 November 2014
The New Government's Readiness Towards ASEAN Economic
Community 2015: Building Infrastructure to Increase Competitiveness
By Ilham A. Habibie
The New Government's Readiness
Towards ASEAN Economic Community
2015: Building Infrastructure to Increase
Competitiveness Wednesday, 12 November 2014
15th Anniversary of The Habibie Center
Dr.-Ing. Ilham A. Habibie, MBA
Vice Chairman, KADIN Research & Technology
Source: Edelman Indonesia’s South East Asia Public Affairs team
Global Competitiveness
Index 2014-2015
Source: WEF The Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015
Competitiveness Aspects Cambodia Indonesia Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Thailand Vietnam
Quality of Overall infrastructure 109 72 20 138 95 76 112
Quality of Roads 93 72 19 134 87 50 104
Quality of railroad infrastructure 98 41 12 94 80 74 52
Quality of port infrastructure 97 77 19 125 101 54 88
Quality of air transport infrastructure 106 64 19 137 108 37 87
Available airline seat km/week, millions 83 14 22 86 25 15 30
Quality of electricity supply 110 84 39 117 87 58 88
Mobile telephone subscriptions/100 pop 39 54 30 144 86 34 42
Fixed telephone lines/100 pop 116 71 73 125 113 91 86
Logistic Costs
Country Logistic Costs (% GDP)
USA 9.9
Japan 10.6
South Korea 16.3
Singapore 8.0
Malaysia 13
Thailand 20
Vietnam 25
Indonesia 27
Source: Annual Logistics Report compiled by ITB, ALI, STC,
Panteia, and the World Bank Indonesia Office, 2014
McKinsey Study (November 2014)
6
(1) Capturing a greater share of global flows. The
global economy has become deeply interconnected as
huge volumes of goods, services, capital, people, and
data move across borders. Southeast Asia can
capitalize on this phenomenon b accelerating
implementation of the ASEAN Economic Community
integration plan to create a single market of 600
million consumers.
Southeast Asia at the crossroads:
Three paths to prosperity
McKinsey Study (November 2014)
7
(2) Riding the urbanization wave. The booming
cities of Southeast Asia account for more than 65
percent of the region’s GDP today, and more than
90 million people are expected to move to urban
areas by 2030. ƒ
(3) Deploying disruptive technologies. Five
related technologies—the mobile Internet, big
data, the Internet of Things, the automation of
knowledge work, and cloud technology— could
modernize sectors across the economy and drive
major productivity improvements.
Characteristics of needed
Infrastructure
(1) Connectivity of infrastructure is key
(1) Urban infrastructure needs to be a
strong focus
(1) Digital infrastructure as ‘meta
infrastructure’
Keywords: smart
8
9
National ICT Structure
INFRASTRUCTURE
ICT FOR
GOVERNMENT
ICT FOR
HEALTH
ICT FOR
ECONOMICS
NATIONAL ICT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
ICT FOR
EDUCATION
2015 ASEAN Economic Community
Indonesia
Country with Economy
based on Innovation and Knowledge
10
BROADBAND NETWORK
Source : Telkom Indonesia
BANDA ACEH
PALEMBANG
DENPASAR
KUPANG
DLI
BDR LAMPUNG
MANADO
FAKFAK
MERAUKE
JAYAPURA
PALU
PADANG
PEKANBARU
PONTIANAK
BANDUNG
AMBON
SORONG BALIKPAPAN
JAKARTA
BATAM
MATARAM
PAREPARE
SAMARINDA
SINGAPORE
PENANG
SATUN
SEMARANG
BANJARMASIN
MAKASAR
SURABAYA
MEDAN
Songkhla
TIS (Thailand)
SANGATA
BATURAJA
TIMIKA
MALAKA
BENGKULU
WAINGAPU
KETAPANG
PKL.BUN
AAG (Hongkong. USA)
JAMBI
TERNATE
R 1B Y-2009
R-1A Y-2006
R-2 Y-2006
R-3 TERESTERIAL
Y-2006
R 3 SUB MARINE Y-2006
R-4 Y-2010
R-5 Y-2004
R-6 Y-2004
R-7 SUBMARINE Y-2008
R-9 SUBMARINE Y-2009
KUPANG-ATAMBUA Y-2012
MKCS TERRESTERIAL
Y-2011
R-8 TERRESTERIAL Y-2009 R-8 SUBMARINE
Y-2010
TUTUYAN
LUWUK
KAUDITAN
SOFIFI
LABUHA SANANA
NAMELA MASOHI BULA
BANDANERA
KAIMANA
BIAK
KENDARI
MANUKWARI
SARMI
MAUMERE
ENDE
RUTENG L. BAJO
SUMBAWA
RABA
BENCULUK
JOGYAKARTA
BANGKINANG
KLRJ
LINGGAU
M.BNG
PKL.PINANG
TJ.PANDAN
TASIK
JATINEGARA CIREBON
TARAKAN
SINTANG
TN.GRGT PALANGKARAYA
SINGKAWANG
SANGGAU
TN.GUNING
TJ. REDEP
MR.TWH
BUNTOK
TJ.TABLONG
JENEPONTO
SENGKANG
PALOPO
TPOSO
PARIGI
MAJENE
MAMUJU
DONGGALA
BONEPUTE RANTEPAO
SANTIGI
ISIMU
GORONTALO
OMPU
AMURANG
KOLAKA
WATAMPONE
MKCS SUBMARINE
Y-2011
ATAMBUA
DUMAI
Sorong-Fakfak Y-2014
Atambua-Maumere-Makasar Y-’13-14
BALI-LOMBOK-KUPANG Y-2013
Atambua-Ambon Y-2017
Timika-Merauke Y-2020
Atambua-Timika Y-2020
Watampone-Kolaka Y-2013
Guam Y-2017
PALAPA RING 10
Y-2013
Satellite TELKOM 3S
International
Gateway
Second Internationa
l Gateway
Express Super Core Batam -
Manado
: existing : on going : planned
Legend :
National Coverage : Optical Transport of 75.000 Km covering 2015 90% of the Kabupaten’s capitals Express Super Core for the 2nd International Gateway in 2015 Satellite Telkom 3S to be launched in 2016
11
IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
BROADBAND
Without Broadband With Broadband
Politics • Bureaucratic problems
• Not integrated
• Not transparent
• Less democratic
• Fast response regarding citizen
complaints
• Integrated
• Transparent
• More democratic
Economy • Less Growth
• Higher unemployment
• Economy & environment less
sustainable
• Higher Growth
• Lower unemployment
• Economy & environment more
sustainable
Social • More easily divided
• Social interaction needs more effort
• Social interaction more effective
and efficient
Culture • Preservation and cultural interaction
low
• Lack of recognition and appreciation
of national culture
• Preservation and cultural
interaction high
• Better recognition and appreciation
of national culture
Science &
Technology
• Overly dependent on foreign
sources
• Less developed
• Local culture growth
• Push for innovation culture in
society
• Better national technology
development
12
PILOT PROJECT implementing at six (6) cities / districts in
Indonesia:
Kota Pekalongan (Jateng), Kab. Banyuwangi (Jatim), Kab.
Banyuasin (Sumsel), Kab. Jembrana (Bali), Kota Balikpapan
(Kaltim), Kab. Minahasa Utara (Sulsel).
PILOT PROJECT CITY / REGENCY
Institute for Democracy
through Science &
Technology (IDST)
Meaningful Broadband Indonesia (MBI)
initiative in collaboration with Digital
Divide Institute, USA:
• Useable
• Affordable
• Empowering
Big Question:
How to Finance (1/2)
Public Sector
(1) Most likely majority of projects
(2) There will be many projects which are
not feasible otherwise
(3) Through BUMN/BUMD as well
Private Sector
(1) Projects have to be commercially
feasible
(2) Monopolies of BUMN/BUMD? 14
Big Question:
How to Finance (2/2)
Public – Private Partnership (PPP)
There has to be revenue base
Weak track record so far
Innovative schemes necessary (e.g. for
ICT)
15
Terima kasih
16