Special Issue Introduction: Cultural Rights and Global ...€¦ · Rights framework. Since the 1966...
Transcript of Special Issue Introduction: Cultural Rights and Global ...€¦ · Rights framework. Since the 1966...
![Page 1: Special Issue Introduction: Cultural Rights and Global ...€¦ · Rights framework. Since the 1966 UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, how far has](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081611/5f02aa657e708231d4056681/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SpecialIssueIntroduction:CulturalRightsandGlobalDevelopmentJonathanVickeryArticleInformationIssue22:2018.SpecialIssueCulturalRightsandGlobalDevelopment,ed.JonathanVickery.Thisarticlewaspublishedon:6thJune2018.JournalISSN:1467-0437AuthorDrJonathanVickeryisdirector of the masters in Arts, Enterprise and Development in the Centre for Cultural and Media Policy Studies at the University of Warwick, UK. He is interested in local development in multicultural contexts and since 2016 is co-Editor in Chief of The Journal of Law, Social Justice and Global [email protected]:JournalofLaw,SocialJustice&GlobalDevelopment,UniversityofWarwick,UKhttp://www2.warwick.ac.uk/research/priorities/internationaldevelopment/lgd/
![Page 2: Special Issue Introduction: Cultural Rights and Global ...€¦ · Rights framework. Since the 1966 UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, how far has](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081611/5f02aa657e708231d4056681/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Inourageofhugereligious,politicalandterritorialconflict,theessentialculturaldimensionofplace,identity,values,andgovernance,isalltooeasilyignored.ThisspecialissueisgiventothesocialanddevelopmentalsignificanceofcultureandculturalpoliciesinaRightsframework.Sincethe1966UNInternationalCovenantonEconomic,SocialandCulturalRights,howfarhastheconceptofcultureasa‘right’beendeveloped?SincethedebatessurroundingtheUNESCOsponsored2007FribourgDeclaration,towhatextentareCulturalRightsnowacceptedasanessentialdimensionofHumanRights?PerhapsusingHumanRightslawtofacilitateCulturalexpressionandparticipationhasbeenproblematicandotherlegalinstrumentsaremoreeffective(suchasculturalpoliciesonaccessandequality,orheritageprotections,orinternationaltreatiseslikethe2005UNConventionontheProtectionandPromotionoftheDiversityofCulturalExpressions).Orperhapsasustainedlegal,socialanddevelopmentdiscourseonCulturalRightsbywriters,researchscholarsanddevelopmentagencies,hasnotbeensufficientlyconsistentandrobustinanyareaofdevelopmentresearchandpolicy.
WhenthisSpecialIssuewasfirstenvisaged,itwasintendedasaglobalforumfordialogueonhowrightscurrentlypertaintothisjournal'sprinciple(andmultidisciplinary)fieldsoflegal,socialanddevelopmentresearch.Itaimedtoattractresearchpaperson(butnotlimitedto)thefollowingtopics:
>CulturalRightsandHumanRights,internationaltreatisesandUNconventions.>CulturalRightsandCulturalPolicies(particularlydiversity,equality,genderandheritagepolicies).>TheculturalconditionsofthejuridicalinterpretationandapplicationofHumanRights.>CulturalRights,multiculturalismandpoliticalpluralism.>CulturalRights,massimmigrationanddiasporas.CulturalRightsinwarandconflictzones.>Religion,faithcommunitiesandCulturalRights.CulturalRights,censorshipandcontemporaryarts.
>Artsorganisations,NGOsanddevelopmentagenciesthatpromoteCulturalRights.
IhavereproducedthislistfromtheoriginalCallforPapersasitindicatesthesignificantscopeofrelevanceforthisotherwiseunder-researchedsubject.Thisspecialissueattractedmanycontributions,notallofthemcouldbepublished.Theonesthatwerepublishedadequatelycoverthefirstthreebulletpoints;therestwillnowfeatureinabroaderresearchproject,outofwhichwillhopefullyseeforthcomingfurtherthematicissuesofthisjournal.Thisspecialissuetherefore,didnotsucceedindefiningtheparametersofthissubject,andforthemostpartremainsfocusedonthelegalemergenceofcultureasaconceptinHumanRightsandcognateareasofsupra-nationalpolicydiscourse.Nonetheless,wealsobroachothersignificanttopicsandissues:justiceforculturalworkersandartists,artscensorship,informationandthepoliticalmanagementofthemedia,andNGOsinaspecificcorneroftheEuropeanregion(Serbia).
Thisissueopenswithaninterview,ontheoccasionofthenewArtsRightsJusticeAcademy(ARJ),whoseopeningin2017attractedthefirstUNSpecialRapporteurinCulturalRights,Ms.FaridaShaheed(2009-2015).TheAcademyprojectdoesnotaimtocreateaneducationortraininginstitutionassuchbutmoreadynamicandmobilespace,whereculturalpractitioners,activistsandresearchers,policy,legalandsocialexperts,cancometogethertodiscussthepressingissuesfacingRightstoday.TheARJ'sapproachisdialogicandstructuredaroundthesharingofexperiencesandintelligence--andcultivatethevariousformsofsolidarityanddemocraticagencythatemergedinthefaceofthe'Europeanmigrantcrisis'starting2015.Thereasonthisinterviewwaspositionedattheopeningofthisspecialissueisbecausequestionsof'Rights'invariablyrevolvearoundtheinstitutionoflaw,local,regionalandglobal,andthelegalapplicationofitsstatutes,conventions,treatisesandprotocols.However,ashasbeenmadeapparentbybothfirstandsecondUNSpecialRapporteurinCulturalRights–thesecondbeingMs.KarimaBennoune(since2015)–thetranslation,transmissionandapplicationoflaw
![Page 3: Special Issue Introduction: Cultural Rights and Global ...€¦ · Rights framework. Since the 1966 UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, how far has](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081611/5f02aa657e708231d4056681/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
requireasmuch(inthewordsoftheARJmissionstatement)"tostrengthenandexpandstructuresforthepromotionandprotectionofartisticfreedom"andotherkindsofculturalfreedom.ThevalueoftheUNinstitutionsofHumanRights(andtheirregionalandnationalexpressions)extendsfarbeyondthelawanditsapplication–toeducation,culturaldiplomacy,negotiationinpeaceandreconciliation,promotinggenderequalityandminorityorindigenousexpressionsofculturallife,andofcourseengaginginprotestagainstprohibitionsandsuppressionofculturalexpression(whethergroundedinlawornot).Onthislattersubject,ImustmakereferencetotwonotablepublicationsbroughttomyattentionduringseminarsIdeliveredonCulturalRightsinHildesheim(December2017-January2018):UNESCO'scontributiontothe1995UNYearforTolerance–'Violence'–astudyofattacksonartistandwritersinAlgeria,andtherecentFreemusegroup'sinternationalsurveyof2018,'TheStateofArtisticFreedom2018'(Copenhagen:Freemuse.org).Botharetestamenttoanhistoricaldiscoursethathasremainedonce-removedfrommainstreamculturalpolicydebatesasmuchasdevelopmentstudies.Thismarginalisationmustnotpersist:mattersofrights,justice,citizenshipandrepresentation,mustbecome(astheywereininthe1960sand70s)morecentraltohowweunderstandtherelationbetweenculture,policy,community,developmentandtheresourcesandopportunitiesofevolvinggloballegaldiscourse.
Polishlawyerandinternationalwriter,MarcinGórski,entitleshisarticlewiththecrypticindictmentofJesus,beginning"Andwhosoevershalloffendoneoftheselittleones..?"(GospelofMark9:42).Hisproblematicistheconceptof‘communitystandard’,whichatonceidentifiestheboundariesofreasonandacceptabilityinlegalrulingsoncensorship,yetisdeeplyambiguous.Górski,withaforensicapproachandinternationalreach,citesseminallegalframeworksandrulingsthatlegaldefineartisticexpressionanditslimitsinternationally.Hechallengesthebasis,andvarianceintheuseofthecommunitystandardandthemanyassumptionsonthemeaningandoperationof"expression"inartandartisticproductionanddisplay.Whileraisingmanyquestionspertinenttothedisciplineof
philosophicalaesthetics,Górskimaintainsafocusonthelegalarticulationofhiskeyconcepts.Andwithoutcontrivingajudicialdialoguebetweenthelandmarkdifferinginterpretationsofdifferentcourtsheoffersafulloverviewoflegalpracticeinternationally.Hisargumentattendstotheambiguity–inpartcreatedbyart'sown"transgressive"character.
Legalscholar,MarcellaFerri(Italy),broadensourconcernsfromtheconceptofarttotheconceptof"culture"itself.Sheattendstotheconceptual-legalarchitectureofCulturalRights,astheconceptemergedfromthekeyUNconventions.Shepointsoutthatwhileapoliticalassumptiononthesemanticsoftheterm"culture"hasbeenmaintainedthroughthedraftingofvariousUNconventions,theassumptionconcealsarangeofmeanings–eachofwhichallowingforarangeoflegalapplicationsofCulturalRights.Ourunderstandingofcultureisinvariablyanthropological,ethnic,socialandidentiarian,butasarigorouslegalscholarwillpointout,astrictcausalrelationbetweenthesemanticsandpragmaticsofatermisnecessaryforlegalrulingstoharmonise,andthemanyarticlesofadeclaration,conventionorcovenanttoworktogether.Withdetailedprecision,FerrimovesthroughthecentrallegalframeworksforCulturalRights,identifyingtheprincipalclausesineach,andformingadiscussionaroundparticipation,therightsofchildren,andthejudgementoftheInternationalCriminalCourtinthe"AlMahdicase"(2016).Thecaseissignificantinitspotentialexpansionofheritage,awayfromitstraditionaldesignationaspropertyintorealmsofculturalidentity,humandevelopmentandcommunitylife.
JordiPascual(Spain),consultant,activistandacademic,fleshesoutwhatthismightmean–andoftenitdoesmeanforprogressiveculturalpolicies.Heexplainsthevariousways(organisationsandtheirstrategies)thatCulturalRightsarepracticedandhowtheyareaddressingcentralissuesinculturaldevelopment,expressionsofplace,communityandidentity,andthesustainabilityofsociallifeonlocal,regionalandglobalregisters.Pascual'sexperienceatworkinginpolicyadvocacyinthesethreeregistersareevidentinhiscommandofknowledgeonhow
![Page 4: Special Issue Introduction: Cultural Rights and Global ...€¦ · Rights framework. Since the 1966 UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, how far has](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081611/5f02aa657e708231d4056681/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
majorculturalpolicyframeworksarticulatelegalconceptsofRights,andmoreover,howbasicrightsinparticipation,identityandhistoricculturallife,areinterconnectedwithmorecontemporarypracticesofcreativeexpressionandthepoliticalfightforamoreequitablesociety.Pascual'scontributionstandsasasignificantsummaryoverviewoftherelationbetweenculturalpolicyandCulturalRights,whileunderscoringtheimportanceofNGOsandrepresentativegroups,likeAgenda21forCulture–apioneeringventureofthecivilsocietyassociation,UnitedCitiesandLocalGovernments(UCLG).Bywayofconclusion,heofferssixmajorstepsforwardinadvancingCulturalRightsasculturalpolicyinpractice.
TherestofthisSpecialIssuefeaturesanapproachtoCulturalRightsintermsofcriticalcontemporaryissues–artisticproduction(Chineseopera;educationalinnovationwithSyrianrefugees),sustainability(inglobaldevelopment),informationandmedia,andculturalNGOsinSerbia.Thefirstofthese,bynotableChinascholarHailiMa(UK-China),isparticularlyinterestinggiventhedegreeoffieldworkinwhichherstudyisgrounded(indeed,thescholarwasonceanoperasinger).Moreover,boththiscontributionandthatoninformationandmediaapprehendacentralpoliticaldilemma–whatdo"rights"meaninacountrywhoselegalsystemdoesnotrecogniseanindividual'sseparation(andevenelevationover)theState.IftheStateisconceivedasthecollectiveexpressionofpoliticalwill,thentopositanindividual'swillassomehowoverthecollectiveisnonsensical,notwithstandingthatChinahasindeedpositioneditselfattheforefrontofglobalculturaldiscoursesofcreativecityurbandevelopmentandcultural(indigenousandintangible)heritage.
HailiMAoffersanoutlineoftherightsissuesatthebasisofChina'smosttraditionalandcommonculturalexpression(opera),yetentangledinpoliticaldiscourseandculturalpolicydevelopments.Chineseopera,onceneglected(ifnotdisdainedasanimproperexpressionofcommonsentiment)hasrecentlybecomeanobjectofpoliticalrecognition,signifyingbothacrisisandanattemptedrenewalofpolitical
legitimacy.MAunravelsthepoliticalshiftsanimatingthenewprofileofChineseopera,andhowhistoricalconceptionsofartsandartistsareever-framedbythestrategicpoliticalrelationofgovernmentandculture.Thequestionofrightsinthisarticleemerges"immanently"–givenhowrightsinChinaareindeedsubmergedinlayersofpoliticalexpediency.Thismeansthatrightsidentifyastruggleforprofessionalidentity,artisticautonomyandthespacesofculturalexpression.Indeed,inNiChen'sarticleonthepoliticalmanagementofthemediainChina,theissueofculturalself-determinationiscentral.
AsculturaleconomyscholarNiChen(UK-China)pointsout,"rights"asalegalconceptassumesthatindividualagencypossessesthecapacitytoexercisearightortousearightstotheiradvantageorself-regard.Yetthiscannotbeassumed,atleastinanationvigorouslyattemptingtore-inventnationalismthroughculturalself-determination.Asacountry,Chinaisassertingitsself-perceivednationalculturalrights,intermsofaneedforcoherenceandassertiveself-expressioninmedia,education,communicationandinformation.PresidentXiJinping,whileurbaneandeducated,hasreinvigoratedpoliticalcontroloverthenation'smediaindustriesandthestrategicrepresentationofcurrentaffairs.Chen'scultural-historicalapproachoffersabroadandcriticalviewonthesignificanceofthenewnationalismasidentifiedinthepoliticalmanagementmediaandcommunications–framedintermsofthelesser-developedareaofCulturalRights,information.Withreferencetothefreedomofthepublicrealm,editorialvalues,differingviewpointsinthemedia,andthemulti-facettedcharacterofnationalismasacurrentpoliticalproject,Chenarguesthatwhileolderformsofoppressionandcensorshiphavegone,anewassertivenationalunityhassettheparametersofmeaningandindividualexpressioninthepublicrealm.Thestatusofindividualrightsremainpoliticalrelativeandnotself-evidentasassumedbythetermsoftherelevantUNconventions.
DenizGürsoy's(Turkey)contributiondemonstrateshowaseeminglysimpleformofculturalprovisionforrefugees(an"IdeasBox"),
![Page 5: Special Issue Introduction: Cultural Rights and Global ...€¦ · Rights framework. Since the 1966 UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, how far has](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081611/5f02aa657e708231d4056681/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
canprovidehopeandempowermenttoanotherwisedispossessedandoftenignoredcondition.TheconditionofPRSor'protractedrefugeesituations'isnotnew,butonlyrecentlyunderstoodatUNpolicylevelandequallyonlyrecentlyanobjectofculturalintervention.Why–giventheevidentsignificanceofdiasporas,exilesandimmigrantstotheculturalhistoryofmanyofourcountries–areweslowinrecognisinghowtheconditionoftherefugeeisaculturalonceasmuchasapoliticalorhumanitarianone?Gürsoypresentsaframeworkaroundwhichweneedtoformulateurgentquestionsforculturalpolicy.
Serbiaisasingularlyinterestingcaseasacountry–intermsofitsrecentandpresentbattleswiththepoliticalmanagementofcultureandthepublicrealm.OntheedgesofEurope(havebeenengagedinEUaccessionnegotiationssince2014),thisoncecenterofcommunistYugoslaviahasexperiencedradicalshiftsinconstitutionallaw,thecurrentadoptedonlyin2006.Inthisinterestingpictureofthecountry'slegalattitudeandpoliticalapproachtoCulturalRights,BelgradelawyerMiljanaJakovljevićidentifiesthefaultlinesofcultureandfreedomwithreferencetoculturalNGOs.Herpremiseisthattheabilityofculturalorganisations(historicandcontemporary)tocarryouttheirworkofadvocacy,commissioning,eventsandthepromotionofculture,isindicativeasthemeasureoffreedomandprotectionthelawallows.Usinganormativeanalysisofconstitutionalanddomesticlawandwithreferencetospecificmajorlegalacts,JakovljevićexplainshowtheadmirablyclearlegalarticulationofCulturalRightsinSerbiaisnotadequatefortheflourishingofcontemporarycultureorevenadiffusingofthehistorictensionbetweencultureandStateactors.
ThisSpecialIssueconcludeswithinternationally-renownedscholaronglobaldevelopmentandsustainability,JohnClammer(UK-India).Hisarticletitleisphrasedasaquestion–ontherelationbetweenRights,SustainabilityandDevelopment(aspropernouns,eachidentifyinganormativeandinstitutionaliseddiscourseontheaimsofaequitablesocietyandcooperativeglobalorder).Clammerarguesthatthesenormativediscoursesareessentiallycontiguous,eventhoughthe
currentcapitalistglobalordermaintainsvestedinterestsintheirseparation.Withatheoretically-informedexplorationoftheirmeaningandfunctionininternationaldevelopmentframeworksconcernsmostofthepaper,theconcludingsixpropositionsareforcefulastheyareimaginative:hisconcludingstatementisinstructive:“Thebottomlinethenisanexpandednotionofhumanrightsthatnotonlyincludesculturalrights,butwhichseesthefulfillmentorachievementofarights-basedworldasconstitutingthenatureofsustainabilityandthepurposeorendofdevelopment.Socialjusticeisthenon-negotiableproject,butintherecognitionthatsocialjusticemustnowincludebothculturalandecologicaljusticeintherecognitionofdevelopmentasaholisticandlife-enhancingprocess.”
ReferencesFreemuse(2017)TheStateofArtisticFreedom2018[Freemuseannualstatisticsoncensorshipandattacksonartisticfreedom],Copenhagen:Freemuse.UNESCO&FedericoMayor(1995)Violence,Paris:UnitedNationsEducational,ScientificandCulturalOrganisation.©JournalofLaw,SocialJustice&GlobalDevelopment