Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

13
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez

Transcript of Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Page 1: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Special Education in the United States

Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez

Page 2: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Today

More than 200,000 infants and toddlers receive services

More than 6.5 million children and youth ages 3-21 receive special education and related services to meet individual needs.

Page 3: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Access to Public Education Education of All Handicapped Children’s Act, EHA (1975)

The right of all handicapped children to receive a free, appropriate public education.

Funds provided to enable states and local education agencies to comply with the requirements.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, IDEA(1997)

Reauthorization of EHA

Requirements for states to provide special education that is aligned with federal standards as a condition for receiving federal funds

Entitled every student to a free and appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment

Page 4: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Reauthorization of IDEA – 2004Current Status

Reauthorized several times with the 2004 alignment with 2001’sNo Child Left Behind Act: Established parameters for highly qualified teachers

and assessment requirements

Amended disciplinary procedure

Individuals Education Program procedures and eligibility criteria for learning disabilities to include the use of general education interventions and progress monitoring.

Create procedures for educating children with disabilities in private schools located within a school district’s boundaries

Page 5: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Funding

Cooperative federalism model- State and Federal funding Federal Regulations and Mandates

established Statutes and regulations occur at the

local level by school districts under the supervision of their State government.

Subject to judicial review

Page 6: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Funding IDEA authorized Congress to

contribute up to 40% of the national average per pupil expenditure for each student Have failed to implement the original

authorization Creates financial pressure for the local

school district States provide 45% - Local Districts 46%

9% through Federal IDEA funding

Page 7: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Qualifying- 13 Specific categories Autism

Developmental disability

Specific learning disability

Intellectual impairment

Emotional and/or behavioral disability

Speech and language disability

Deaf-blind

Visual impairment

Hearing impairment

Orthopedic or physical impairment

Other health impaired (attention deficit disorder, multiple disabilities, traumatic brain injury)

Page 8: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Evaluation Process – Comprehensive school evaluation Parent and/or teacher identification Parent approval Provided at no cost to family Comprehensive – any area of need In native language of child Administered by a team of professionals Administered one-to-one Prior interventions must have taken place before

evaluation Observation by person other than classroom teacher Evaluation then determines eligibility – one of 13

categories identified.

Page 9: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Individual Education Program (IEP) Developed by team – at least one parent Statement of the child’s present levels of educational

performance Describes the effects of the child’s disability on the

affected areas of the child’s academic and non-academic school performance

Statement of the annual goals, including short term goals

Specific special education and related services to be provided to the child and the extent to which the child will participate in regular education program.

Dates for initiation of services Annual review of IEP 3 year Review

Page 10: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Transition Services Transitions services are designed to focus on

improving academic and functional achievement for children. These types of services help develop a person’s ability to gain employment and independent living skills. The goal of transitional services is to prepare students with disabilities for adult living. In most states these services extend to age 21 or when the student meets his/her goals and objectives, which will be designated in their IEP (Center on Education Policy, 2005).

Page 11: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Current Legislation “Blueprint” The Blueprint sets a goal that, by 2020, all graduating high

school students will be college and career ready regardless of their disability status.

Achieving this goal will likely include:

Inclusion of students with disabilities in general education classrooms.

Professional development for principals and teachers to improve the effectiveness of instruction.

Equitable allocation of effective educators to provide high-poverty, high minority schools.

Support of school principals and special and general education teachers to effectively address the academic and socio-economic issues faced by students with disabilities.

Page 12: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

“Blueprint” Enhancement of early intervention programs, including Response to

Intervention and Positive Behavioral Supports.

Identification and implementation of drop-out factors that disaproportionately impact students with disabilities.

Increase the rate of high school graduation for special education students with a standard high school diploma.

Continued use of accountability systems.

Greater use of technology to improve instruction.

Effective use of student data to monitor student progress

More effective collaboration between schools and parents.

Page 13: Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.

Not only equity but quality!