SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

16
Joint Information Systems Committee Global Repositories Network? Dr Neil Jacobs

Transcript of SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Page 1: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Global Repositories Network?

Dr Neil Jacobs

Page 2: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Covering....

Reasons for a global network: why bother?

An ideal vision

Barriers and drivers

Challenges and opportunities

Page 3: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Why bother? Open Knowledge

http://thand.wordpress.com/

Open knowledge is any kind of information – sonnets to statistics, genes to geodata – that can be freely used, reused, and redistributed.

(Open Knowledge Foundation)

“...freely used, reused, and redistributed...”

• Financial (free, and sustainable)• Temporal (free now, and later)• Rights and rewards (free, and counted)• Technical (free, and usable)

Page 4: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Why bother? Repositories

Science is about inferences made over data

Universities have a responsibility to the public

Repositories manage and share:

Linked (to enable inferences to be made)

Open (because it is efficient and effective, and aligns with university mission)

Trusted (provenance of assertions)

Data (observations, records, simulations, software, traces, literature, digital manuscripts, musical scores...)

Page 5: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

An ideal vision – piecing together the jigsaw?

Page 6: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

An ideal vision: socio-technical engineering

1970s proposal for electric car, based on a theory of post-industrial society and the demise of the internal combustion engine and the infrastructure that surrounds it...

1880s builds an infrastructure to enable the success of incandescent lighting, comprising patents, generators, regulatory frameworks, commercial companies...

Page 7: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

An ideal vision: socio-technical engineering

1970s proposal for electric car, based on a theory of post-industrial society and the demise of the private internal combustion engine and the infrastructure that surrounds it...

1880s builds an infrastructure to enable the success of incandescent lighting, comprising patents, generators, regulatory frameworks, commercial companies...

2010s vision of a new repository infrastructure to manage and share linked, open, trusted data to support (post)industrial science?

Page 8: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

An ideal vision: features of the network

Dynamics:

1. System building

2. Technology transfer across domains and locations

3. gateways that allow dissimilar systems to be linked into networks

4. multiple systems assemble into networks, and networks into webs or “internetworks”

Designers need

“navigation strategies”

Page 9: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

An ideal vision: features of the network

Dynamics:

1. System building

2. Technology transfer across domains and locations

3. gateways that allow dissimilar systems to be linked into networks

4. multiple systems assemble into networks, and networks into webs or “internetworks”

Designers need

“navigation strategies”

Local implementations, University Press, Institutional policies...

Eprints, Duracloud, Creative Commons...

Sword, OAI-ORE, COAR, SPARC

??

Page 10: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

An ideal vision: features of the network

(Adapted from recommendations to NSF)

It learns from the past and present (repositories have a lot of ‘past’ now!)

– Eg, content packaging, registries, semantic web... How do we learn?

It enables and rewards improved practice (see below)

– Requirements...

– Innovation...

– Infrastructure...

It has resilience, sustainability, and reach.

– Resilience – eg, managed LOCKSS-style approaches, embedded in academic policies and practice

– Sustainability – eg, Ithaka work, alignment with core academic principles

– Reach – it enrols people well beyond the academic sector (open innovation)

Page 11: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Barriers

Path dependency

– OAIPMH? HTTP? Librarians?

Governance: “who decides on rules and conventions for sharing, storing, and preserving data?”

– ISO? COAR? IFLA? W3C?

Flexibility: “local variation vs. global standards”, cultures...

– North America, South America, Japan, Europe... (question for panel?)

Pragmatics and opportunities: ~ How can national and institutional repository development move forward without compromising possibilities for international or even global infrastructure formation?

Page 12: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Challenges and opportunities“...enables and rewards improved practice“

Paul Walk, UKOLN

Page 13: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Challenges and opportunities“...enables and rewards improved practice“

Page 14: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Challenges and opportunities“...enables and rewards improved practice“

Page 15: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Challenges and opportunities“...enables and rewards improved practice“

Page 16: SPARC Repositories conference in Baltimore - Nov 2010

Joint Information Systems Committee

Thank you

Neil Jacobs

[email protected]

Skype: neil.jacobs1

JISC: www.jisc.ac.uk