SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL REGIONAL LINKS:...
Transcript of SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL REGIONAL LINKS:...
SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL
OCTOBER 2015
REGIONAL LINKS: GLOBAL CONNECTIONS
Conexus Indiana is the state’s advanced manufacturing
and logistics initiative, dedicated to making Indiana
a global leader in these high-growth, high-tech industries.
The mission of CILC is to work with a sense of urgency to
strengthen the logistics sector in Indiana by identifying and
acting on concrete opportunities for enhancement, which
better positions the State to grow existing business, attract
new business, and thereby create new jobs.
I
CONEXUS INDIANA SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL
CHAIR
*Doug PratherPresidentRanger Enterprises, LLCSeymour
Jim BakerPrincipalBaker Commercial Real EstateJeffersonville
*Bob BlockerSr. VP, Sales & Customer ServiceAmerican Commercial LinesJeffersonville
Bill BoydManager, Business DevelopmentInland ServicesCeltic Logistics, The Celtic GroupLouisville, KY
Wendy Dant ChesserPresident & CEOOne Southern IndianaNew Albany
Matt ConradPlant ManagerLucas OilCorydon
Harold ForcePresidentForce Construction Company, Inc.Columbus(Multimodal, Chair)
John GoldmanPresidentLouisville & Indiana Railroad Co.Jeffersonville
*Cathy HaleCEOMadison RailroadMadison
Sandy HuffOffice ManagerHuff Contractors, Inc.West Harrison
Bob Koetter, Jr.PresidentKoetter ConstructionFloyds Knobs
Jorge LanzPrincipalJacobi, Toombs & Lanz, Inc.Louisville
Charles Latham IIGeneral ManagerTPG Mount Vernon Marine,Jeffersonville Barge ServiceUtica
John LinvilleVP, Supply ChainBatesville Casket Company, Inc.Batesville
Chuck LongManagerMG Rail - ConsolidatedGrain & Barge Co.Jeffersonville
Alan LowePresidentLowe’s Pellets & Grain, Inc.Greensburg
Stephen LukinovichPartnerMountjoy Chilton MedleyJeffersonville
Chuck MoorePresidentEagle Steel Products, Inc.Jeffersonville(Workforce Dev., Chair)
*John MooreOwnerPackaging & Logistics Solutions, Inc.New Albany
Kim MoranTerminal ManagerTanco Clark MaritimeJeffersonville
James NobbeFleet Manager, Rail Equipment GroupThe David J. Joseph Co.Cincinnati, OH
Scott RedelmanMgr, Production ControlToyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing, Inc.Columbus
Jeff ShiremanPartnerJames L. Shireman, Inc.Corydon
*Noah SodrelPresident & CEOSodrel Truck Lines, Inc.Jeffersonville
II
*Steve SpauldingVP, Engine Business Purchasing and Supply ChainCummins, Inc.Columbus
Mark St. ClairMgr., Ohio Valley RegionConsolidated Grain & Barge Co.Jeffersonville
Kerry StemlerPresident & CEOKM Stemler Company, Inc.New Albany
Scott StewartPort DirectorPorts of Indiana - JeffersonvilleJeffersonville
David SummittOwner & PresidentSummitt TruckingClarksville(Public Awareness, Chair)
Tom TyraDir., Marketing & Air Service DevelopmentLouisville Regional Airport AuthorityLouisville, KY
Shorty WhittingtonPresidentGrammer Industries, Inc.Grammer(Public Policy, Chair)
Patti YountJeffersonville Office ManagerLochmueller GroupJeffersonville
* Conexus Indiana Logistics Council Member
III
IV
Regional Links: Global Connections was created by leading members of the logistics users community through Southeast Indiana.
The logistics community, made up of the four modes of transportation including air, rail, truck, and water, and advanced manufacturing, infrastructure, service providers, and warehouse/distribution companies, gathered and agreed unanimously on the key opportunities of commonality. The Conexus Indiana Logistics Council, partnering with regional economic groups and chambers of commerce in Southeast Indiana (including One Southern Indiana) created the Southeast Regional Logistics Council (SERLC) and was the catalyst in creating the forum of logistics executives to discuss issues affecting our industries and building a common agenda across all logistics sectors, including both private and public. By achieving alignment of priorities in the areas of infrastructure, public policy and workforce development, Southeast Indiana will be able to maximize short- and long-term success for the logistics sector in this region.
The logistics industry claims ownership of Regional Links: Global Connections, ensuring that items necessary for the Southeast Region’s success are in place to enhance the environment for companies to grow their business, create a more attractive business climate to locate in Southeast Indiana, and create high paying jobs for citizens in our region.
If the strategies, goals and tactics developed in this plan are implemented by the private and public sectors, the Southeast Region will continue to grow its reputation for logistics and ensure its future success.
The countless hours and dedication of the volunteer executives from the Southeast Regional Logistics Council (SERLC) provide the Conexus Indiana Logistics Council (CILC), the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), the Ports of Indiana, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation, and the regional and local economic groups and chambers of commerce with a strong foundation to make the goals outlined in this plan a reality. Conexus Indiana and the regional and local economic groups and chambers of commerce will carry out these initiatives and will drive the implementation of the tactics necessary to ensure the plan’s success.
We look forward to continuing the conversations on opportunities for the logistics sector in the Southeast Region that we might have missed, and will continue our work by updating the plan on a regular basis, This “living breathing document” will continue creating innovation, engagement and vision ensuring economic results and impact for our region.
Respectfully,
Doug Prather President, Ranger Enterprises, LLCChair, Southeast Regional Logistics Council
LETTER FROM CONEXUSSOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL CHAIR
V
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1
PROBLEM STATEMENT ..............................................................................................1
MISSION STATEMENT .............................................................................................1
OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................2
LOGISTICS STRATEGIES ....................................................................................3
INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS .........................................................................................3
PUBLIC POLICY GOALS .............................................................................................4
PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS .....................................................................................4
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS ........................................................................4
IMPLEMENTATION TACTICS ............................................................................5
INFRASTRUCTURE .....................................................................................................5Regional Tactics .....................................................................................................5 Local Tactics ..........................................................................................................9
PUBLIC POLICY ......................................................................................................41
PUBLIC AWARENESS ..............................................................................................41
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................42
LOGISTICS MARKET ANALYSIS ....................................................................43
TRANSPORTATION MODE SWOT ANALYSIS .............................................................43
PUBLIC POLICY SWOT ANALYSIS .............................................................................47
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SWOT ANALYSIS ........................................................51
PUBLIC AWARENESS SWOT ANALYSIS .....................................................................52
SOUTHEAST REGION INFRASTRUCTURE DATA ...........................................................53
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
The Conexus Indiana Southeast Regional Logistics Council (SERLC) is a forum of 32 logistics executives and thought leaders from throughout Southeast Indiana representing the following logistics sectors: air, infrastructure, rail, trucking, warehousing/distribution, waterborne, advanced manufacturing and services firms. Logistics users are manufacturers, distributors/warehousing, and third-party providers.
SERLC is working to:
◆◆ Enhance the environment for companies in advanced manufacturing and logistics to grow their business, taking advantage of Indiana’s position at the heart of the global supply chain;
◆◆ Create a more attractive environment for manufacturing and logistics companies to relocate to or expand in the Southeast Region, thereby creating jobs and increasing State and local revenue; and
◆◆ Create high paying jobs for Hoosiers – the average wage of Indiana manufacturing and logistics jobs is more than 33 percent higher than the State’s median income.
PROBLEM STATEMENTThe Southeast Region’s transportation network has opportunities for improvement due to transportation “bottlenecks,” lack of direct rail service, underutilized air facilities with little international freight movement, lack of efficient mode-to-mode connectivity (e.g. road to rail, road to water, road to air, rail to water), a decaying lock and dam infrastructure, and lack of dredging that prohibits barges/ships to maximize capacity. This disconnect has created higher costs, potential environmental impacts, inefficient freight movement, loss of productivity for Southeast Region business, and safety impacts.
MISSION STATEMENTThe mission of the Southeast Regional Logistics Council is to create, enhance and maximize unique opportunities for the logistics industry (air, rail, truck, water, warehouse/distribution) in the Southeast Region.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL
2
OBJECTIVES
1. Executive Forum: Provide a forum for Southeast Region logistics executives to discuss issues affecting the industry;
2. Infrastructure: Develop a comprehensive plan to strengthen the Southeast Region’s public and private logistics infrastructure;
3. Public Awareness: Develop paid and earned media to promote the sector;
4. Public Policy: Identify State and Federal public policy areas that impact the logistics industry, and work with State and Federal thought leaders from government, academia and associations to enhance the sector;
5. Workforce Development: Develop and implement strategies to build the human capital needed to support the growing demand for logistics services through innovative workforce programs in the Southeast Region.
3
◆◆ Increase the flow of goods originating, terminating, and adding value within the Southeast Region over the next five years, thereby creating an increase of net new jobs and growing the logistics sector.
◆◆ Provide a broad-based forum consisting of Southeast Region business executives throughout the logistics industry for collectively vetting critical relevant logistics public policy issues of commonality, therefore optimizing the business climate.
◆◆ Strengthen and grow the logistics qualified workforce in the Southeast Region by creating portable skills curricula leading to academic degrees/certifications that will increase the pipeline of qualified workers over the next five years.
◆◆ Increase the public’s awareness of the importance of the logistics industry on the Southeast Region’s economy.
INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS
1. Reduce bottlenecks in the Southeast Region to improve the reliability and efficiency of freight movement leading to less congestion, reduced infrastructure repairs, and lower emissions.
2. Ensure global access by connecting Southeast Region cities based on impact and potential to Interstate-like access.
3. Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports via roads and rail modes and improve the reliability and efficiency of water freight movement to and from the Southeast Region.
4. Develop a fast and efficient process for unplanned economic development infrastructure needs.
5. Develop and implement transportation networks that provide direct rail, truck access and air cargo expansion leading to the improvement and establishment of multimodal and intermodal service and air cargo facilities.
LOGISTICS STRATEGIES
4
PUBLIC POLICY GOALS
1. Ensure Federal, State, and local Government do not legislate or regulate barriers to the safe, efficient, and innovative movements of goods and resources that are necessary to support the growth of the logistics sector.
2. Ensure Federal, State, and local Government provide the necessary funding for the public infrastructure needed to support the efficient and cost effective operation of the Southeast Region’s logistics sector.
3. Ensure SERLC is recognized by governmental entities as a resource of first resort and the voice for the logistics industry within the Southeast Region.
PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS
1. Develop brand awareness of SERLC.
2. Create general public understanding of logistics by ensuring that the population has a basic understanding of logistics.
3. Increase the perception of the need to improve/expand the Southeast Region’s infrastructure.
4. Highlight the Southeast Region’s logistics companies by bringing awareness to their products and services.
5. Increase the public’s understanding of the positive impact of global trade on the Southeast Region’s economy and jobs.
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
1. Increase the skill levels of the Southeast Region’s logistics workers through workforce education programs.
2. Increase the upward mobility and job prospects of current and future Southeast Region logistics workers.
5
REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING SERLC INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS
◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING AVIATION GOALS
◆◆ Air Cargo Volume Study: Conduct a private sector study on air cargo volume for integrated and non-integrated freight and air passenger travel, with the long-term objective of maximizing the use of air capacity
◆ REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS
PROJECT # COUNTY SOUTHEAST REGIONAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4
1008 Bartholomew, Clark, Jackson, Scott I-65 Additional Lanes
1009 Bartholomew, Clark, Jackson, Scott Indianapolis to Louisville Rail Line Upgrade
1010 Clark Ohio River Bridges
1011 Clark Ports of Indiana Jeffersonville
2204 Floyd Sherman Minton Bridge Reconstruction
3101 Floyd, Harrison I-64 Additional Lanes
3904/6903 Decatur, Franklin, Jefferson, Ripley US 421 Additional Lanes
6506 Out of State Olmsted Lock Reconstruction
7202 Jefferson, Scott Madison Connector
2202 Floyd, Harrison SR 111 Improvements
2203 Floyd, Harrison, Washington US 150 Road Improvements
3605 Jackson, Jennings US 50 Road Improvements
7801 Decatur, Ripley, Switzerland Kentuckiana Corridor
8801 Clark, Washington SR 60 4-Lane Highway
IMPLEMENTATION TACTICS
o
o
!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!¹º»¼
¹º»¼
!
!
!
¹º»¼
!
¬«211
¬«462
¬«42
¬«750
¬«148
¬«203
¬«144
¬«235
¬«362
¬«356
¬«67
¬«335
¬«337
¬«252
¬«45
¬«121
¬«258¬«262
¬«39
¬«446
¬«129 ¬«101
¬«160
¬«37
¬«1
¬«7
¬«244
¬«350
¬«229
¬«250
¬«48
¬«256
¬«60
¬«9
¬«11
¬«46
¬«44
¬«58
¬«62
¬«135
¬«3
¬«56
£¤27
£¤421
£¤150
£¤52
£¤50£¤31
§̈¦265
§̈¦64
§̈¦74
§̈¦65
MONROE
LAWRENCE
U N I O N
B A R T H O L O M E W
C L A R K
J O H N S O N
S C O T T
S W I T Z E R L A N D
ORANGE
MORGAN
J E F F E R S O N
J E N N I N G S
D E A R B O R N
W A S H I N G T O N
B R O W N
J A C K S O N
H A R R I S O N
R I P L E Y
R U S H
O H I O
F R A N K L I N
CRAWFORD
F L O Y D
S H E L B Y
D E C A T U R
F A Y E T T E
6902
7801
3610
3610
1603
2402
7201
3605
03033905
4001
1502
8802
7204
1504
0304
1010
7802
6901
1002
7202
2202
3904
1503
7801
8801
2401
3606
3906
1501
3101
2203
6903
8801
1008
1008
1009
1009
1604
3602
0306
3608
7205
3104
1007
0307
1006
Ü0 105
Miles
Date: 9/8/2015
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter
Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region
IdentifiedEnhancementCategories for Localand State FacilitiesMobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)
State Facility
New Terrain, StateFacility
Local Facility
New Terrain, LocalFacility
New Rail Capacity(new rail line or addedcapacity)
OperationalImprovements(Intersectionimprovements, newinterchange, interchangemodification, and spotimprovements)
! State Facility
! Local Facility
¹º»¼Rail CrossingImprovement
Multi-ModalEnhancements
o Airport Improvements
!Î Port Improvements
Other FacilitiesNon-Interstate
Interstate
Existing Rail
Navigable Streams
Corp. Limits
Data; Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder InputINDOT Engineering & Asset Management
Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportationinfrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholdersfor graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposesonly. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identifyoptimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decisionmaking. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at thetime and is subject to change.
State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that canuse state or local funds.
2204
7
◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING INTERSTATE/HIGHWAY GOALS
◆◆ Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 4-lane rural segments of the Interstate to a minimum of 6 lanes. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-65 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $2.086 billion
◆◆ Project 1010: Ohio River Bridges – Develop a partnership between Indiana and Kentucky to build two new bridges between Jeffersonville, Indiana, and Louisville, Kentucky, and reconfigure Louisville’s Kennedy interchange design and build two bridges from Jeffersonville, Indiana, to Louisville, Kentucky. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-65 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $1.9 billion
◆◆ Project 2202: SR 111 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 111 from New Boston to Main Street in New Albany. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion and safety on SR 111 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $60.8 million
◆◆ Project 2203: US 150 Road Improvements – Convert US 150 from 2 lanes to 3 lanes from Buck Creek Road at Galena to French Lick. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on US 150 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $339 million
◆◆ Project 2204: Sherman Minton Bridge Reconstruction – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the Sherman Minton Bridge along I-64. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on I-64 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: Not Available
◆◆ Project 3101: I-64 Additional Lanes – Convert from 4 lanes to 6 lanes from State Line to Corydon. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-64 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $160.5 million
◆◆ Project 3605: US 50 Improvements – Convert US 50 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from US 31 to the North Vernon Bypass. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 50 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $115.2 million
8
◆◆ Project 3904/6903: US 421 Additional Lanes – Convert US 421 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from I-71 at Exit 34 in Kentucky to I-74 at Exit 132 in Indiana. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 421 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $235.9 million/$233.1 million
◆◆ Project 7202: Madison Connector – Reconstruct and widen SR 256 as a 4-lane expressway between I-65 in Austin and SR 56/62 near Madison. Reason: Ensure global access by connecting cities based on impact and potential to Interstate-like access.
Estimated Cost: $226.5 million
◆◆ Project 7801: Kentuckiana Corridor – Convert SR 129 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from SR 56 to I-74. Reason: Create economic development with direct connection to industries creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $198.7 million
◆◆ Project 8801: SR 60 4-Lane Highway – Upgrade the existing 2-lane highway to a 4-lane highway from I-65 to SR 37. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on SR 60 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $210 million
◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING RAIL GOALS
◆◆ Project 1009: Indianapolis to Louisville Rail Lane Upgrade – Support the Louisville & Indiana Railroad rail line upgrades from Indianapolis to Louisville allowing 286,000 pound rail cars. Reason: Create economic development by allowing for heavier rail cargo shipments.
Estimated Cost: $90 million
◆◆ Project 1011: Ports of Indiana/River Ridge Commerce Center Rail Connection – Connect the Ports of Indiana to River Ridge Commerce Center by constructing rail along the Transportation Corridor. Reason: Create economic development by allowing better multi-modal connectivity to the Ports of Indiana.
Estimated Cost: $40 million
◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING WATERBORNE GOALS
◆◆ Project 6506: Olmsted Lock Reconstruction – Replace Locks and Dams 52 and 53, known as the Olmsted Locks and Dam, which are under construction between Illinois and Kentucky upstream from the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Olmsted will replace Locks and Dams 52 and 53 and greatly reduce tow and barge delays through the busiest stretch of river in America’s inland waterways. Reason: Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports.
Estimated Cost: $1.38 billion
9
◆ LOCAL PRIORITY PROJECTS
PROJECT # COUNTY SOUTHEAST LOCAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4
0301 Bartholomew SR 46/SR 11 Interchange Improvements and Rail Grade Separation (Overpass)
1007 Clark I-265/SR 62 Interchange
3609 Jackson US 50 Rail Grade Separation (with an overpass)
0307 Bartholomew Flat Rock River Rail Bridge Replacement
1001 Clark River Ridge Airport Connector
1002 Clark SR 62 Road Improvements
1503 Dearborn West Lawrenceburg Truck Corridor
3107 Harrison Louisville Connector Bridge
3601 Jackson South Seymour Truck Corridor
3603 Jackson US 50/I-65 Interchange Improvement
3604 Jackson US 50/US 31 Intersection Improvement
3610 Jackson Seymour Rail Intersection Improvements
3901 Jefferson US 421 Extension
3903 Jefferson SR 62/SR 256/SR 56 Intersection Improvement
4001 Jennings North Vernon Bypass
6901 Ripley US 50 Road Improvements
7205 Scott Industrial Rail Spur
0303 Bartholomew SR 58 Improvements
0304 Bartholomew North Side Columbus Truck Corridor
0305 Bartholomew North Marr Road Relocation
0306 Bartholomew Columbus Municipal Airport Runway Extension
1004 Clark Clark Regional Airport Control Tower
1501 Dearborn SR 1 Improvements
2401 Franklin SR 229 Improvements
2402 Franklin West Brookville Truck Corridor
3103 Harrison Landmark Avenue Northeast/SR 135 Intersection Improvements
10
PROJECT # COUNTY SOUTHEAST LOCAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4
3602 Jackson East CR 340 North Rail Grade Separation
3606 Jackson SR 258 Improvements
3608 Jackson South Walnut Street Rail Grade Separation
3905 Jefferson Michigan/Milton Road Improvements
3906 Jefferson SR 62 Improvements
5801 Ohio SR 56 Improvements
6902 Ripley US 421 Improvements
7201 Scott US 31 Improvements
7204 Scott West Scottsburg Truck Corridor
7802 Switzerland SR 101 Extension
0302 Bartholomew Lowell Road Interchange
1006 Clark Old SR 403/US 31 Rail Grade Separation
1502 Dearborn Pribble Road Improvements
1504 Dearborn Wilson Creek Road Improvements
1601 Decatur East Barachel Lane/North Montgomery Road Intersection Improvements
1602 Decatur East Freeland Road/North Montgomery Road Intersection Improvements
1603 Decatur West CR 300 North Improvements
1604 Decatur North CR 80 Northeast Interchange
3102 Harrison Valley Road Truck Corridor
3104 Harrison SR 337 Interchange
3106 Harrison Harrison Way Northwest Railroad Improvements
7203 Scott South Lake Road South/CR 100 West Improvements
8802 Washington Salem Bypass Extension
11
* Th
ese
proj
ects
are
refle
cted
in o
ther
sec
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
◆◆
Proj
ect 0
301:
SR
46/S
R 11
Inte
rcha
nge
Impr
ovem
ents
an
d Ra
il G
rade
Sep
arat
ion
(Ove
rpas
s) –
Re-
engi
neer
, re
confi
gure
and
rede
sign
SR 4
6/SR
11
inte
rcha
nge
and
build
and
des
ign
a ra
il gr
ade
sepa
ratio
n (o
verp
ass)
at th
e Lo
uisv
ille
Indi
ana
Railr
oad.
Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottl
enec
k of
com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
car
traf
fic c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $3
0 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 0
302:
Low
ell R
oad
Inte
rcha
nge
– D
esig
n an
d bu
ild
an in
terc
hang
e at
I-65
at L
owel
l Roa
d. R
easo
n: C
reat
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent w
ith d
irect
con
nect
ion
to in
dustr
ies
crea
ting
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $2
0 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 0
303:
SR
58 Im
prov
emen
ts –
Exte
nd S
R 58
from
I-6
5 to
SR
7. T
his
conv
erts
Wes
t CR
450
Sout
h/Ea
st C
R 40
0 So
uth
to S
R 58
from
I-65
to S
R 7.
Rea
son:
Cre
ate
econ
omic
dev
elop
men
t with
dire
ct c
onne
ctio
n to
indu
strie
s cr
eatin
g be
tter t
ruck
traf
fic fl
ow fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$27
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 0
304:
Nor
th S
ide
Col
umbu
s Tr
uck
Cor
ridor
–
Des
ign
and
build
a n
ew ro
ad W
est o
f the
airp
ort f
rom
C
entra
l Ave
nue
to E
ast C
R 50
0 N
orth
/W
est C
R 50
0 N
orth
. Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
and
pa
ssen
ger c
ar c
onge
stion
thro
ugh
Col
umbu
s cr
eatin
g be
tter
truck
traf
fic fl
ow fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$27.
4 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 0
305:
Nor
th M
arr R
oad
Relo
catio
n –
Re-e
ngin
eer,
reco
nfigu
re a
nd re
desig
n N
orth
Mar
r Roa
d fro
m A
rnol
d St
reet
to
Eas
t CR
500
Nor
th. R
easo
n: C
reat
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
by a
llow
ing
for e
xpan
sion
of a
irpor
t Eas
t of N
orth
Mar
r Roa
d.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$ .2
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 0
306:
Col
umbu
s M
unic
ipal
Airp
ort R
unw
ay
Exte
nsio
n –
Con
vert
the
leng
th o
f the
runw
ay fr
om 6
,400
to
7,5
00 fe
et. R
easo
n: C
reat
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent b
y al
low
ing
larg
er p
lane
s to
acc
ess
airp
ort.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $1
6.5
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 0
307:
Fla
t Roc
k Ri
ver
Rail
Brid
ge R
epla
cem
ent –
D
esig
n an
d bu
ild a
new
repl
acem
ent r
ail b
ridge
ove
r the
Fl
at R
ock
Rive
r allo
win
g 28
6,00
0 po
und
rail
cars
. Rea
son:
C
reat
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent b
y al
low
ing
for h
eavi
er ra
il ca
rgo
ship
men
ts.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
Incl
uded
in re
gion
al p
roje
ct c
ost f
or
Proj
ect 1
009
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
100
8: I-
65 A
dditi
onal
Lan
es –
Thi
s is
a re
gion
al
proj
ect r
eflec
ted
on th
e m
ap o
n pa
ge 6
.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
100
9: In
dian
apol
is to
Lou
isvi
lle R
ail L
ine
Upg
rade
–
This
is a
regi
onal
pro
ject
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
BA
RTH
OLO
MEW
CO
UN
TYPR
OJE
CTS
!
!
¹º»¼
o
0305
0303
0304
1008
¬ «3¬ «750
¬ «135
¬ «252
¬ «135
¬ «9
¬ «58
¬ «11¬ «7
¬ «46
¬ «46
¬ «3
£ ¤31
£ ¤31
§̈ ¦65
Col
umbu
s
Jone
svilleC
liffo
rd
Hop
e
Edin
burg
h
Har
tsvi
lle
Eliz
abet
htow
n
0305
0303
03041009
10091008
1008
0302
0306
0307
Ü 03
1.5
Mile
s
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Bar
thol
omew
Cou
nty
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
0301
13
* Th
ese
proj
ects
are
refle
cted
in o
ther
sec
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
CLA
RK
CO
UN
TYPR
OJE
CTS
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
001:
Riv
er R
idge
Airp
ort C
onne
ctor
– D
esig
n an
d bu
ild a
new
road
Wes
t of t
he a
irpor
t con
nect
ing
the
Rive
r Rid
ge C
omm
erce
Cen
ter.
Reas
on: C
reat
e ec
onom
ic
deve
lopm
ent w
ith d
irect
con
nect
ion
from
airp
ort t
o in
dustr
ies
in R
iver
Rid
ge C
omm
erce
Cen
ter c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flo
w fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
. Estim
ated
Cos
t: N
ot A
vaila
ble
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
002:
SR
62 R
oad
Impr
ovem
ents
– C
onve
rt SR
62
from
4 la
nes
to 6
lane
s fro
m S
R 3
at C
harle
stow
n to
I-2
65. R
easo
n: R
elie
ve th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd
pass
enge
r car
con
gesti
on a
long
SR
62 c
reat
ing
bette
r tra
ffic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $6
7 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
004:
Cla
rk R
egio
nal A
irpor
t Con
trol T
ower
– B
uild
an
d de
sign
a ne
w c
ontro
l tow
er a
t the
Cla
rk R
egio
nal
Airp
ort.
Reas
on: S
afet
y of
airp
lane
s m
ovin
g ca
rgo
ensu
ring
effic
ient
air
traffi
c flo
w.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $4
.5 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
006:
Old
SR
403/
US
31 R
ail G
rade
Sep
arat
ion
–
Build
and
des
ign
a ra
il gr
ade
sepa
ratio
n at
the
Loui
sville
In
dian
a Ra
ilroa
d at
Old
US
403/
US
31. R
easo
n: S
afet
y of
tru
cks
mov
ing
carg
o en
surin
g ef
ficie
nt tr
affic
flow
in S
elle
rsbur
g.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
Not
Ava
ilabl
e
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
007:
I-26
5/SR
62
Inte
rcha
nge
– C
ompl
ete
desig
n an
d bu
ild o
f int
erch
ange
at I
-265
at S
R 62
. Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
car
traf
fic
crea
ting
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $6
milli
on
◆◆
*Pro
ject
100
8: I-
65 A
dditi
onal
Lan
es –
Thi
s is
a re
gion
al
proj
ect r
eflec
ted
on th
e m
ap o
n pa
ge 6
.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
100
9: In
dian
apol
is to
Lou
isvi
lle R
ail L
ine
Upg
rade
–
This
is a
regi
onal
pro
ject
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
880
1: S
R 60
4-L
ane
Hig
hway
– T
his
is a
regi
onal
pr
ojec
t refl
ecte
d on
the
map
on
page
6.
!
!
!
o
¬ «11
¬ «203
¬ «265
¬ «111
¬ «62
¬ «64
¬ «335
¬ «3
¬ «160
¬ «62
¬ «60
£ ¤150
£ ¤31
£ ¤31
§̈ ¦65
Jeffe
rson
ville
Selle
rsbu
rg
New
Prov
iden
ce
Utic
a
Cla
rksv
ille
Cha
rlest
own
1001
1013
1010
1002
1008
8801
1009
100910
07
1006
Ü 03.
51.
75M
iles
Dat
e: 9
/8/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Cla
rk C
ount
y
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
y
New
Ter
rain
, Sta
teFa
cilit
yLo
cal F
acilit
y
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
1010
3906
15
DEARBORN COUNTYPROJECTS
◆◆ Project 1501: SR 1 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 1 from US 50/I-275 to I-74 at Exit 164. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion and safety on SR 1 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo from Lawrenceburg to I-74.
Estimated Cost: $25.2 million
◆◆ Project 1502: Pribble Road Improvements – Improve and widen Pribble Road from SR 1 to SR 48. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along SR 1 and SR 50 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $16.5 million
◆◆ Project 1503: West Lawrenceburg Truck Corridor – Design and build a West Lawrenceburg truck corridor from SR 56/US 50 at Aurora to US 50/SR 1 East of Lawrenceburg. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion through Lawrenceburg creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $73.7 million
◆◆ Project 1504: Wilson Creek Road Improvements – Improve and widen Wilson Creek Road from US 50 to SR 48. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 50 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $20.2 million
◆◆ *Project 5801: SR 56 Improvements – This is a local project reflected in the Ohio County map on page 32.
* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report.
5801
Aurora
Dillsboro
Lawrenceburg
St. Leon
Greendale
WestHarrison
MooresHill
¬«156
¬«56
¬«148
¬«62¬«262
¬«262
¬«350
¬«350
¬«46
¬«46
¬«101
¬«101
¬«1
¬«1
¬«48
¬«48
¬«56
1502
1504
1503
1501
£¤52
£¤50
£¤50
§̈¦275
§̈¦74
Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Dearborn County
Ü0 2.51.25
MilesCoordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter
Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regionaltransportation infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders for graphic representation. Use of this map should belimited to preliminary planning purposes only. Additional planning, environmentalstudy, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the time and issubject to change.
Date: 9/1/2015IdentifiedEnhancementCategories for Localand State Facilities
Mobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)
State Facility
New Terrain, StateFacility
Local Facility
New Terrain, LocalFacility
New Rail Capacity(new rail line oradded capacity)
Operational Improvements(Intersection improvement,new interchange,interchange modification,and spot improvements)
! State Facility
! Local Facility
¹º»¼Rail CrossingImprovement
Multi-ModalEnhancements
o AirportImprovements
!Î Port Improvements
Other FacilitiesExisting Rail
Non-Interstate
Interstate
Navigable Streams
Corp. Limits
Data; Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder InputINDOT Engineering & Asset Management
State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.
17
* Th
ese
proj
ects
are
refle
cted
in o
ther
sec
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
601:
Eas
t Bar
ache
l Lan
e/N
orth
Mon
tgom
ery
Road
Inte
rsec
tion
Impr
ovem
ents
– Re
-eng
inee
r, re
confi
gure
an
d re
desig
n Ea
st Ba
rach
el L
ane/
Nor
th M
ontg
omer
y Ro
ad
inte
rsec
tion.
Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
an
d pa
ssen
ger c
ar tr
affic
cre
atin
g be
tter t
ruck
traf
fic fl
ow fo
r th
e m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $2
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
602:
Eas
t Fre
elan
d Ro
ad/N
orth
Mon
tgom
ery
Road
Inte
rsec
tion
Impr
ovem
ents
– Re
-eng
inee
r, re
confi
gure
an
d re
desig
n Ea
st Fr
eela
nd R
oad/
Nor
th M
ontg
omer
y Ro
ad
inte
rsec
tion.
Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
an
d pa
ssen
ger c
ar tr
affic
cre
atin
g be
tter t
ruck
traf
fic fl
ow fo
r th
e m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $3
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
603:
Wes
t CR
300
Nor
th Im
prov
emen
ts –
Impr
ove
and
wid
en W
est C
R 30
0 N
orth
from
Old
US
421
to 2
nd
Stre
et in
Ada
ms.
Rea
son:
Cre
ate
econ
omic
dev
elop
men
t by
prov
idin
g fro
ntag
e ro
ads
from
Gre
ensb
urg
indu
strie
s.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$3.8
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 1
604:
Nor
th C
R 80
Nor
thea
st In
terc
hang
e –
Des
ign
and
build
an
inte
rcha
nge
at I-
74 a
t Nor
th C
R 80
Nor
thea
st.
Reas
on: C
reat
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent w
ith d
irect
co
nnec
tion
to in
dustr
ies
crea
ting
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for
the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$8 m
illion
◆◆
*Pro
ject
690
3: U
S 42
1 A
dditi
onal
Lan
es –
Thi
s is
a re
gion
al
proj
ect r
eflec
ted
on th
e m
ap o
n pa
ge 6
.
DEC
ATU
R C
OU
NTY
PRO
JEC
TS
!!
!
¬ «121
¬ «46
¬ «7
¬ «48
¬ «350
¬ «129
¬ «9
¬ «46
¬ «46
¬ «229
¬ «3
£ ¤52
£ ¤421
§̈ ¦74
New
Poin
t
Gre
ensb
urg
St. P
aul
Millh
ouse
n
Wes
tpor
t1603
6903
1601
1602
1604
Ü 03
1.5
Mile
s
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Dec
atur
Cou
nty
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
19
FLOYD COUNTYPROJECTS
◆◆ *Project 2202: SR 111 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
◆◆ *Project 2203: US 150 Road Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
◆◆ *Project 2204: Sherman Minton Bridge Reconstruction – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
◆◆ *Project 3101: I-64 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report.
!
!
Georgetown
Greenville
NewAlbany
¬«62
¬«403
¬«311
¬«335
¬«111
¬«64
¬«11
¬«62
¬«62
¬«111
¬«111
¬«60
¬«60
2204
2203
2202
3101
£¤31
£¤31
£¤150
£¤150
§̈¦64
§̈¦64
§̈¦265
§̈¦65
Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Floyd County
Ü0 21
MilesCoordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter
Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regionaltransportation infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders for graphic representation. Use of this map should belimited to preliminary planning purposes only. Additional planning, environmentalstudy, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the time and issubject to change.
Date: 9/1/2015IdentifiedEnhancementCategories for Localand State Facilities
Mobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)
State Facility
New Terrain, StateFacility
Local Facility
New Terrain, LocalFacility
New Rail Capacity(new rail line oradded capacity)
Operational Improvements(Intersection improvement,new interchange,interchange modification,and spot improvements)
! State Facility
! Local Facility
¹º»¼Rail CrossingImprovement
Multi-ModalEnhancements
o AirportImprovements
!Î Port Improvements
Other FacilitiesExisting Rail
Non-Interstate
Interstate
Navigable Streams
Corp. Limits
Data; Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder InputINDOT Engineering & Asset Management
State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.
21
FRA
NK
LIN
CO
UN
TYPR
OJE
CTS
◆◆
Proj
ect 2
401:
SR
229
Impr
ovem
ents
– Im
prov
e an
d w
iden
SR
229
from
I-74
exi
t 149
to U
S 52
at M
etam
ora.
Rea
son:
Re
lieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
and
pas
seng
er
cong
estio
n an
d sa
fety
on
SR 2
29 c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flo
w fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
. Estim
ated
Cos
t: $5
2.1
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 2
402:
Wes
t Bro
okvi
lle T
ruck
Cor
ridor
– D
esig
n an
d bu
ild a
new
road
Wes
t of C
liff S
treet
alo
ng th
e In
dian
a &
O
hio
Railr
oad
line
from
US
52 N
orth
to U
S 52
Sou
th n
ear
Pear
l Stre
et. R
easo
n: R
elie
ve th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
con
gesti
on o
n U
S 52
thro
ugh
Broo
kville
cr
eatin
g be
tter t
ruck
traf
fic fl
ow fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
. Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$9 m
illion
¬ «1
¬ «101
¬ «244
¬ «129¬ «12
1
¬ «1
¬ «1
¬ «101
¬ «252
¬ «229
¬ «46
£ ¤52
£ ¤52
§̈ ¦74
Ced
arG
rove
Laur
el
Old
enbu
rg
Broo
kville
Mou
ntC
arm
el
24022401
Ü 02.
51.
25M
iles
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Fra
nklin
Cou
nty
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
23
HARRISON COUNTYPROJECTS
◆◆ *Project 2202: SR 111 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
◆◆ *Project 2203: US 150 Road Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
◆◆ *Project 3101: I-64 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
◆◆ Project 3102: Valley Road Truck Corridor – Design and build a new road East of the Tyson Foods facility connecting to SR 62. Reason: Create economic development by allowing for expansion of industries.
Estimated Cost: $3 million
◆◆ Project 3103: Landmark Avenue Northeast/SR 135 Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign Landmark Avenue Northeast/SR 135 intersection. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic and safety creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $.5 million
◆◆ Project 3104: SR 337 Interchange – Design and build an interchange at I-64 at SR 337. Reason: Create economic development with direct connection to industries creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: Not Available
◆◆ Project 3106: Harrison Way Northwest Railroad Improvements – Improve the Lucas Oil Railroad crossings on Harrison Way Northwest. Reason: Safety of trucks moving cargo.
Estimated Cost: .037 million
◆◆ Project 3107: Louisville Connector Bridge – Design and build a bridge from SR 111 to I-264 in Kentucky. Reason: Create economic development with direct connection to industries creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: Not Available
* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report.
!!
Elizabeth
Lanesville
Laconia
NewAmsterdam
Mauckport
Corydon
NewMiddletown
Crandall
Palmyra
¬«62¬«62
¬«211
¬«462
¬«335
¬«335¬«66
¬«66
¬«337
¬«337
¬«111
¬«111
¬«64
¬«64
¬«11
¬«11
¬«135
¬«135
¬«66
¬«60
3103
3104
310231
06
2203
3101
£¤150
£¤150
§̈¦64
Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Harrison County
Ü0 3.51.75
MilesCoordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter
Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regionaltransportation infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders for graphic representation. Use of this map should belimited to preliminary planning purposes only. Additional planning, environmentalstudy, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the time and issubject to change.
Date: 9/1/2015IdentifiedEnhancementCategories for Localand State Facilities
Mobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)
State Facility
New Terrain, StateFacility
Local Facility
New Terrain, LocalFacility
New Rail Capacity(new rail line oradded capacity)
Operational Improvements(Intersection improvement,new interchange,interchange modification,and spot improvements)
! State Facility
! Local Facility
¹º»¼Rail CrossingImprovement
Multi-ModalEnhancements
o AirportImprovements
!Î Port Improvements
Other FacilitiesExisting Rail
Non-Interstate
Interstate
Navigable Streams
Corp. Limits
Data; Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder InputINDOT Engineering & Asset Management
State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.
2202
3107
25
* Th
ese
proj
ects
are
refle
cted
in o
ther
sec
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
JACK
SON
CO
UN
TYPR
OJE
CTS
◆◆
*Pro
ject
100
8: I-
65 A
dditi
onal
Lan
es –
Thi
s is
a re
gion
al p
roje
ct
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
100
9: In
dian
apol
is to
Lou
isvi
lle R
ail L
ine
Upg
rade
– T
his
is a
regi
onal
pro
ject
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
601:
Sou
th S
eym
our
Truc
k C
orrid
or –
Des
ign
and
build
a
new
road
from
Bur
khar
t Bou
leva
rd to
US
50 o
n th
e W
est s
ide
of S
eym
our.
Reas
on: R
elie
ve th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd
pass
enge
r con
gesti
on o
n U
S 50
thro
ugh
Seym
our c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $3
1.7
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
602:
Eas
t CR
340
Nor
th R
ail G
rade
Sep
arat
ion
– Bu
ild
and
desig
n a
rail
grad
e se
para
tion
at th
e Lo
uisv
ille In
dian
a Ra
ilroa
d.
Reas
on: S
afet
y on
Eas
t CR
340
Nor
th c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$2 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
603:
US
50/I
-65
Inte
rcha
nge
Impr
ovem
ent –
Re-
engi
neer
, re
confi
gure
and
rede
sign
US
50 in
terc
hang
e at
I-65
. Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
car
traf
fic c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: N
ot A
vaila
ble
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
604:
US
50/U
S 31
Inte
rsec
tion
Impr
ovem
ent –
Re-
engi
neer
, re
confi
gure
and
rede
sign
US
50 in
ters
ectio
n at
US
31. R
easo
n:
Relie
ve th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
car
traf
fic
crea
ting
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $2
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
605:
US
50 R
oad
Impr
ovem
ents
– Th
is is
a re
gion
al p
roje
ct
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
606:
SR
258
Impr
ovem
ents
– Im
prov
e an
d w
iden
SR
258
from
Bel
l For
d D
rive
in S
eym
our t
o SR
58.
Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
and
pas
seng
er c
onge
stion
and
saf
ety
on
SR 2
58 c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $5
3.8
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
608:
Sou
th W
alnu
t Stre
et R
ail G
rade
Sep
arat
ion
– Bu
ild a
nd
desig
n a
rail
grad
e se
para
tion
at C
SX tr
acks
. Rea
son:
Saf
ety
on S
outh
W
alnu
t Stre
et c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $1
0 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
609:
US
50 R
ail G
rade
Sep
arat
ion
(with
an
over
pass
) – B
uild
an
d de
sign
a ra
il gr
ade
sepa
ratio
n at
the
Loui
sville
& In
dian
a Ra
ilroad
rail
lines
at U
S 50
/Tip
ton
Stre
et in
Sey
mou
r. Re
ason
: Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of
com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
con
gesti
on a
nd sa
fety
on U
S 50
/Tip
ton
Stre
et c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $6
5 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
610:
Sey
mou
r Ra
il In
ters
ectio
n Im
prov
emen
ts –
Redu
ce
the
num
ber o
f rai
l int
erse
ctio
ns in
Sey
mou
r fro
m 6
inte
rsec
tions
to
2. R
easo
n: R
elie
ve th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
co
nges
tion
and
safe
ty in
Sey
mou
r cre
atin
g be
tter t
ruck
traf
fic fl
ow fo
r th
e m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $7
0 m
illion
◆◆
*Pro
ject
720
1: U
S 31
Impr
ovem
ents
– Th
is is
a lo
cal p
roje
ct re
flect
ed
in th
e Sc
ott C
ount
y m
ap o
n pa
ge 3
6.
!
!!
¹º»¼
¬ «7
¬ «135
¬ «235
¬ «11
¬ «11¬ «13
5
¬ «446
¬ «256
¬ «39
¬ «258
¬ «135
¬ «250
¬ «58
£ ¤31
£ ¤50
§̈ ¦65
Brow
nsto
wn
Med
ora
Cro
ther
sville
Seym
our
3605
3610
3609
3601
3606
1009
100910
08
1008
3602
3603
3608
Ü 03.
51.
75M
iles
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Jac
kson
Cou
nty
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
7201
3604
27
* Th
ese
proj
ects
are
refle
cted
in o
ther
sec
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
901:
US
421
Exte
nsio
n –
Des
ign
and
build
a n
ew
road
from
Eas
t 2nd
Stre
et in
Mad
ison
to S
R 56
. Rea
son:
Re
lieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
and
pas
seng
er c
ar
cong
estio
n al
ong
US
421
crea
ting
bette
r tra
ffic
flow
for t
he
mov
emen
t of c
argo
.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$18
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
903:
SR
62/S
R 25
6/SR
56
Inte
rsec
tion
Impr
ovem
ent –
Re-
engi
neer
, rec
onfig
ure
and
rede
sign
SR 6
2/SR
256
/SR
56
inte
rsec
tion.
Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
and
pas
seng
er c
ar tr
affic
cr
eatin
g be
tter t
ruck
traf
fic fl
ow fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
. Es
timat
ed C
ost:
Incl
uded
in re
gion
al p
roje
ct c
ost f
or
Proj
ect 7
202
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
390
4: U
S 42
1 A
dditi
onal
Lan
es –
Thi
s is
a re
gion
al
proj
ect r
eflec
ted
on th
e m
ap o
n pa
ge 6
.
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
905:
Mic
higa
n/M
ilton
Roa
d Im
prov
emen
ts –
Impr
ove
and
wid
en M
ichi
gan/
Milt
on R
oad
from
US
421
to S
R 62
. Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
an
d pa
ssen
ger c
ar c
onge
stion
alo
ng M
ichi
gan/
Milt
on R
oad
crea
ting
bette
r tra
ffic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $1
2 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 3
906:
SR
62 Im
prov
emen
ts –
Impr
ove
and
wid
en S
R 62
from
Mar
ble
Hill
Road
to S
R 25
6. R
easo
n: R
elie
ve th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
car
con
gesti
on
alon
g SR
62
crea
ting
bette
r tra
ffic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f ca
rgo.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $5
6 m
illion
◆◆
*Pro
ject
720
2: M
adis
on C
onne
ctor
– T
his
is a
regi
onal
pr
ojec
t refl
ecte
d on
the
map
on
page
6.
JEFF
ERSO
N C
OU
NTY
PRO
JEC
TS
¬ «250
¬ «203
¬ «56
¬ «356
¬ «203
¬ «362
¬ «250 ¬ «35
6
¬ «250
¬ «250
¬ «62
¬ «129
¬ «56¬ «56
¬ «7
¬ «256
¬ «62
¬ «3
£ ¤31
£ ¤421
Mad
ison
Broo
ksbu
rg
Dup
ont
Han
over
3904
7202
3905
3906
Ü 03
1.5
Mile
s
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Jef
fers
on C
ount
y
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
3901
29
JENNINGS COUNTYPROJECTS
◆◆ *Project 3605: US 50 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
◆◆ Project 4001: North Vernon Bypass – Design and build a new road from US 50 to SR 3. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion through North Vernon creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $28.5 million
* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report.
Vernon
¬«46
¬«250¬«250
¬«7
¬«7
¬«7
¬«7
¬«3
¬«3
¬«3
4001
3605
£¤31
£¤50
£¤50
§̈¦65
Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Jennings County
Ü0 31.5
MilesCoordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter
Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regionaltransportation infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders for graphic representation. Use of this map should belimited to preliminary planning purposes only. Additional planning, environmentalstudy, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the time and issubject to change.
Date: 9/1/2015IdentifiedEnhancementCategories for Localand State Facilities
Mobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)
State Facility
New Terrain, StateFacility
Local Facility
New Terrain, LocalFacility
New Rail Capacity(new rail line oradded capacity)
Operational Improvements(Intersection improvement,new interchange,interchange modification,and spot improvements)
! State Facility
! Local Facility
¹º»¼Rail CrossingImprovement
Multi-ModalEnhancements
o AirportImprovements
!Î Port Improvements
Other FacilitiesExisting Rail
Non-Interstate
Interstate
Navigable Streams
Corp. Limits
Data; Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder InputINDOT Engineering & Asset Management
State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.
31
OH
IO C
OU
NTY
PRO
JEC
TS
◆◆
Proj
ect 5
801:
SR
56 Im
prov
emen
ts –
Re-e
ngin
eer,
reco
nfigu
re a
nd re
desig
n SR
56
from
Risi
ng S
un to
Aur
ora.
Re
ason
: Saf
ety
on S
R 56
cre
atin
g be
tter t
ruck
traf
fic fl
ow fo
r th
e m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $2
4.5
milli
on
¬ «101
¬ «156
¬ «62
¬ «262
¬ «56
£ ¤50
Ris
ing
Sun
5801
Ü 01.
50.
75M
iles
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Ohi
o C
ount
y
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
33
RIPLEY COUNTYPROJECTS
◆◆ *Project 2401: SR 229 Improvements – This is a local project reflected in the Franklin County map on page 22.
◆◆ *Project 3904/6903: US 421 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
◆◆ Project 6901: US 50 Road Improvements – Convert US 50 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from US 421 to South CR 675 East. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along SR 50 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $89.6 million
◆◆ Project 6902: US 421 Improvements – Convert US 421 by adding acceleration/deceleration lanes to the existing 2 lanes from West CR 200 South to South Industrial Park Boulevard. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 421 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.
Estimated Cost: $2 million
◆◆ *Project 7801: Kentuckiana Corridor – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.
* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report.
Napoleon
Holton
Batesville
Sunman
MilanOsgood
Versailles
¬«262
¬«129
¬«129
¬«229
¬«48
¬«350
¬«350
¬«129
¬«129¬«101
¬«101
¬«62
¬«62
¬«46
¬«46
6902
6901
3904
7801
6903
£¤421
£¤421
£¤421
£¤50
£¤50
§̈¦74
Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Ripley County
Ü0 31.5
MilesCoordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter
Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regionaltransportation infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders for graphic representation. Use of this map should belimited to preliminary planning purposes only. Additional planning, environmentalstudy, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the time and issubject to change.
Date: 9/1/2015IdentifiedEnhancementCategories for Localand State Facilities
Mobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)
State Facility
New Terrain, StateFacility
Local Facility
New Terrain, LocalFacility
New Rail Capacity(new rail line oradded capacity)
Operational Improvements(Intersection improvement,new interchange,interchange modification,and spot improvements)
! State Facility
! Local Facility
¹º»¼Rail CrossingImprovement
Multi-ModalEnhancements
o AirportImprovements
!Î Port Improvements
Other FacilitiesExisting Rail
Non-Interstate
Interstate
Navigable Streams
Corp. Limits
Data; Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder InputINDOT Engineering & Asset Management
State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.
7801
2401
7801
35
* Th
ese
proj
ects
are
refle
cted
in o
ther
sec
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
SCO
TT C
OU
NTY
PRO
JEC
TS
◆◆
*Pro
ject
100
8: I-
65 A
dditi
onal
Lan
es –
Thi
s is
a re
gion
al
proj
ect r
eflec
ted
on th
e m
ap o
n pa
ge 6
.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
100
9: In
dian
apol
is to
Lou
isvi
lle R
ail L
ine
Upg
rade
–
This
is a
regi
onal
pro
ject
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
Proj
ect 7
201:
US
31 Im
prov
emen
ts –
Con
vert
US
31 fr
om
2 la
nes
to 4
lane
s fro
m W
est B
ooe
Road
/C
R 45
0 N
orth
to
I-65.
Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
and
pa
ssen
ger c
ar c
onge
stion
alo
ng U
S 31
cre
atin
g be
tter t
raffi
c flo
w fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$25
milli
on
◆◆
*Pro
ject
720
2: M
adis
on C
onne
ctor
– T
his
is a
regi
onal
pr
ojec
t refl
ecte
d on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
Proj
ect 7
203:
Sou
th L
ake
Road
Sou
th/C
R 10
0 W
est
Impr
ovem
ents
– Im
prov
e an
d w
iden
Sou
th La
ke R
oad
from
M
id-A
mer
ica
Scie
nce
Park
to W
est M
cCla
in A
venu
e/SR
56.
Re
ason
: Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
and
pas
seng
er
cong
estio
n on
Sou
th La
ke R
oad
Sout
h/C
R 10
0 W
est c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he m
ovem
ent o
f car
go.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $3
.2 m
illion
◆◆
Proj
ect 7
204:
Wes
t Sco
ttsbu
rg T
ruck
Cor
ridor
– Im
prov
e an
d w
iden
Wes
t Moo
nglo
Roa
d fro
m U
S 31
to N
orth
Boa
tman
Ro
ad a
nd N
orth
Boa
tman
to S
R 56
. Rea
son:
Rel
ieve
the
bottle
neck
of c
ombi
ned
truck
and
pas
seng
er c
onge
stion
th
roug
h Sc
ottsb
urg
crea
ting
bette
r tru
ck tr
affic
flow
for t
he
mov
emen
t of c
argo
.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$18
milli
on
◆◆
Proj
ect 7
205:
Indu
stria
l Rai
l Spu
r –
Des
ign
and
build
a ra
il sp
ur fr
om th
e Lo
uisv
ille In
dian
a Ra
ilroa
d tra
cks
north
of S
R 35
6 an
d ea
st of
US
31. R
easo
n: C
reat
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
givi
ng fu
rther
rail
acce
ss to
Nor
thw
ind
Cro
ssin
g in
dustr
ies.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $2
milli
on
¹º»¼
¬ «203
¬ «7¬ «25
0¬ «25
0
¬ «356
¬ «203
¬ «362
¬ «356
¬ «250
¬ «160
¬ «56
¬ «62
¬ «39
¬ «56
¬ «3
¬ «3
¬ «256
¬ «256
£ ¤31
£ ¤31
§̈ ¦65
Scot
tsbu
rg
Aust
in
7201
7204
7202
1008
1008
1009
1009
7205
Ü 02.
51.
25M
iles
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Sco
tt C
ount
y
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
0301
7203
37
* Th
ese
proj
ects
are
refle
cted
in o
ther
sec
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
780
1: K
entu
ckia
na C
orrid
or –
Thi
s is
a re
gion
al
proj
ect r
eflec
ted
on th
e m
ap o
n pa
ge 6
.
◆◆
Proj
ect 7
802:
SR
101
Exte
nsio
n –
Des
ign
and
build
a n
ew
road
from
SR
101
to S
R 25
0. R
easo
n: C
reat
e ec
onom
ic
deve
lopm
ent b
y al
low
ing
for a
Nor
th/
Sout
h tru
ck c
orrid
or.
Estim
ated
Cos
t: $5
4 m
illion
SWIT
ZER
LAN
D C
OU
NTY
PRO
JEC
TS
¬ «101
¬ «62
¬ «129
¬ «250
¬ «156
¬ «56
Veva
y
Patri
ot
7802
7801
7801
Ü 02.
51.
25M
iles
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Sw
itzer
land
Cou
nty
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
39
* Th
ese
proj
ects
are
refle
cted
in o
ther
sec
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
WA
SHIN
GTO
N C
OU
NTY
PRO
JEC
TS
◆◆
*Pro
ject
220
3: U
S 15
0 Ro
ad Im
prov
emen
ts –
This
is a
regi
onal
pro
ject
refle
cted
on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
*Pro
ject
880
1: S
R 60
4-L
ane
Hig
hway
– T
his
is a
regi
onal
pr
ojec
t refl
ecte
d on
the
map
on
page
6.
◆◆
Proj
ect 8
802:
Sal
em B
ypas
s Ex
tens
ion
– D
esig
n an
d bu
ild
a ne
w ro
ad fr
om S
R 13
5 to
SR
60. R
easo
n: R
elie
ve th
e bo
ttlene
ck o
f com
bine
d tru
ck a
nd p
asse
nger
con
gesti
on o
n SR
60/
SR 5
6/SR
135
thro
ugh
Sale
m c
reat
ing
bette
r tru
ck
traffi
c flo
w fo
r the
mov
emen
t of c
argo
.Es
timat
ed C
ost:
$16.
3 m
illion
¬ «37
¬ «356
¬ «335
¬ «39
¬ «337
¬ «256
¬ «135
¬ «135
¬ «160
¬ «60
¬ «60
¬ «56
£ ¤150
£ ¤31
£ ¤31
§̈ ¦65
Littl
eYo
rk
Cam
pbel
lsbu
rg
New
Peki
n
Har
dins
burg
Livo
nia
Salti
llo
Sale
m
8802
2203
8801
8801
Ü 03.
51.
75M
iles
Dat
e: 9
/1/2
015
Coo
rdin
ate
Sys
tem
: NA
D 1
983
UTM
Zon
e 16
NPr
ojec
tion:
Tra
nsve
rse
Mer
cato
rD
atum
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
198
3Fa
lse
Eas
ting:
500
,000
.000
0Fa
lse
Nor
thin
g: 0
.000
0C
entra
l Mer
idia
n: -8
7.00
00Sc
ale
Fact
or: 0
.999
6La
titud
e O
f Orig
in: 0
.000
0U
nits
: Met
er
Priv
ate
Sec
tor I
dent
ified
Reg
iona
l N
eeds
Dat
a: In
dian
a G
IS L
ibra
ry &
Sta
keho
lder
Inpu
tIN
DO
T E
ngin
eerin
g &
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t
Plea
se N
ote:
Thi
s m
ap d
epic
ts n
on-c
omm
itted
, non
-fund
ed, c
once
ptua
l reg
iona
l tra
nspo
rtatio
nin
frast
ruct
ure
need
s id
entif
ied
by th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
. Th
ese
need
s ar
e di
spla
yed
as p
lace
hold
ers
for g
raph
ic re
pres
enta
tion.
Use
of t
his
map
sho
uld
be li
mite
d to
pre
limin
ary
plan
ning
pur
pose
son
ly. A
dditi
onal
pla
nnin
g, e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tudy
, and
cos
t-ben
efit
anal
ysis
is n
eede
d to
iden
tify
optim
um a
ltern
ativ
es, a
ctua
l cor
ridor
alig
nmen
ts, a
nd s
yste
m im
pact
to s
uppo
rt fu
rther
dec
isio
nm
akin
g. A
lso
note
, the
dat
a us
ed to
cre
ate
this
map
are
from
the
best
kno
wn
sour
ce a
t the
time
and
is s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge.
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
; Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Iden
tifie
d En
hanc
emen
tC
ateg
orie
s fo
r Loc
al a
ndSt
ate
Faci
litie
s
Cen
tral
Mob
ility
Impr
ovem
ents
(Add
ed tr
avel
lane
s,fr
eew
ay u
pgra
de)
Stat
e Fa
cilit
yN
ew T
erra
in, S
tate
Faci
lity
Loca
l Fac
ility
New
Ter
rain
, Loc
alFa
cilit
y
New
Rai
l Cap
acity
(new
rail
line
or a
dded
capa
city
)
Roa
dway
Enha
ncem
ents
!St
ate
Faci
lity
!Lo
cal F
acilit
y
¹º»¼R
ail C
ross
ing
Impr
ovem
ent
Mul
ti-M
odal
Enha
ncem
ents
oAi
rpor
t Im
prov
emen
ts
!ÎPo
rt Im
prov
emen
ts
Stat
e Fa
cilit
ies
are
US,
Sta
teR
oute
, or U
S H
ighw
ay fu
nded
w
ith s
tate
and
fede
ral f
unds
.
Loca
l Fac
ilitie
s ar
e no
n-st
ate
jurs
idic
tion
faci
litie
s th
at c
anus
e st
ate
or lo
cal f
unds
.
Oth
er F
acili
ties
Non
-Inte
rsta
te
Inte
rsta
te
Exis
ting
Rai
l
Nav
igab
le S
tream
s
Cor
p. L
imits
41
TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING PUBLIC POLICY GOALS
◆◆ Air Pilot Duty Time (Federal)
◆◆ Reduce through Federal legislation or regulation the Federal Aviation Administration rules for pilot certification and qualification requirements for air carrier operations commonly referred to as the “First Officer Qualification Rule” or “1,500 Hour Rule”
◆◆ Boat Captain Regulations (Federal)
◆◆ Reduce through Federal legislation or regulation the U.S. Coast Guard boat pilot requirements
◆◆ Truck Driver Hours of Service (Federal)
◆◆ Reduce through Federal legislation or regulation the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrations Hours of Service Regulation for commercial motor vehicles
◆◆ Aviation Land Restrictions (Federal)
◆◆ Revise the Federal Aviation Administration rules on off-airport development to balance the needs of air safety while ensuring that locals have the ability to control land use for development of commercial business relating to airport activity
◆◆ Setback & Stoplight Policies (State)
◆◆ Pass legislation to create a setback and traffic light policy on high trafficked Federal Interstate and State highways in Indiana
TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS
◆◆ “Did You Know Stories” in the Southeast Region to educate the public on the importance of logistics industry to the Southeast Region and therefore the need for world-class logistics infrastructure
◆◆ Newspaper/Magazine online opinion pieces in the Southeast Region to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry
◆◆ Editorial boards in the Southeast Region to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry
◆◆ SERLC Strategic Plan launch press conferences; editorial boards; newspaper/online opinion pieces to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry to the Southeast Region
◆◆ TV/Radio interviews to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry to the Southeast Region
42
TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
◆◆ Support the concept of implementing a statewide CDL+ Program
◆◆ Support and expand the Conexus Indiana A+ Partners Program and implement the Conexus Indiana HIRE Tech curriculum into high schools to develop job skills in logistics and operations for the Southeast Region
◆◆ Develop a plan to address the logistics shortages for air cargo pilots; truck drivers; and warehouse/logistics maintenance technicians in the Southeast Region
◆◆ Develop a plan to address the lack of logistics certifications and 2-year degree programs in the Southeast Region
◆◆ Work with other regional organizations to support and market a plan to recruit military veterans with CDLs in the Southeast Region
43
LOGISTICS MARKET ANALYSIS
TRANSPORTATION MODE SWOT ANALYSISStrengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) for Indiana’s Southeast Regional Logistics Sector
INFRASTRUCTURE SWOT
STRENGTHS:
◆◆ Air:
◆◆ Strong network of airport facilities
◆◆ Two of top 125 cargo airports: Louisville International Airport #3, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport #9
◆◆ One airport with 11,890 feet or more of runway – Louisville International Airport
◆◆ 12 Regional Public Airports: Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport; Clark Regional Airport; Columbus Municipal Airport; Freeman Municipal Airport; Greensburg Municipal Airport; Lee Bottom Airport; Louisville International Airport; Madison Municipal Airport; North Vernon Airport; Robinson Airport; Salem Municipal Airport; Scottsburg Airport
◆◆ Midwest location
◆◆ Existing excess air capacity
◆◆ Strategic geographic coverage of aviation facilities located around the Southeast Region
◆◆ Rail:
◆◆ Two Class I railroads: CSX and Norfolk Southern Railway
◆◆ Seven Class II and Class III railroads: Central Railroad Company of Indiana; Indiana and Ohio Railway; Indiana Eastern Railroad; Indiana Rail Road; Louisville and Indiana Railroad; Lucas Oil Rail Line; and Madison Railroad
◆◆ Two intermodal facilities – CSX and Norfolk Southern Railway
44
◆◆ Trucking (Roads):
◆◆ Reputation as “Crossroads of America”
◆◆ Five major Interstates and 5 major highways: I-64, I-65, I-74, I-265, I-275, US 31, US 50, US 52, US 150, US 421
◆◆ Strong Midwest location: Borders two states (Ohio & Kentucky)
◆◆ Proximity to Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Louisville, and Nashville markets
◆◆ Proximity to UPS distribution hub at Louisville International Airport
◆◆ Waterborne:
◆◆ One public port on Ohio River – Port of Indiana Jeffersonville
◆◆ 30 private ports on the Ohio River
◆◆ McAlpine Locks and Dam
◆◆ General:
◆◆ Indiana has a trade surplus
◆◆ Leader in exports/imports of important commodities (coal, iron/steel products, grain, food products, scrap metal, etc.)
WEAKNESSES:
◆◆ Air:
◆◆ Southeast Region airports have minimal international domestic air cargo business
◆◆ Jet fuel prices in Southeast Region
◆◆ Lacking a large distribution hub
◆◆ Rail:
◆◆ Partially reliant on Louisville intermodal services
◆◆ Lack of large volume intermodal facilities
◆◆ Limited railroad access to Jeffersonville port
◆◆ Primarily pass through region rail intermodal
◆◆ Trucking (Roads):
◆◆ Bottlenecks or traffic congestion – Jeffersonville/New Albany
◆◆ Lack of adequate capacity on Indiana’s Interstate highways
45
◆◆ Waterborne:
◆◆ Decaying lock infrastructure on Ohio River
◆◆ Dredging issues for ports and waterways on Ohio River
◆◆ Limited railroad access to Jeffersonville port
◆◆ General:
◆◆ Lack of import/export diversification
OPPORTUNITIES:
◆◆ Air:
◆◆ Create a strategy to better utilize the Southeast Region’s airports
◆◆ Utilize excess air capacity
◆◆ Utilize runways and facilities at several airports to accommodate air shipping opportunities
◆◆ Rail:
◆◆ Freight tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)
◆◆ Build additional/better railroad access to Jeffersonville port
◆◆ Trucking (Roads):
◆◆ Freight tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to USDOT
◆◆ Relieve bottlenecks around Southeast Region: Jeffersonville/New Albany
◆◆ Upgrade Southeast Region strategic bridges that are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete
◆◆ Build dedicated truck lanes that separate trucks from passenger cars on I-65
◆◆ Encourage the design of truck lanes on I-65 that can accommodate future technological innovations and uses
◆◆ Allow increase in truck weight limits along Kentucky and Ohio borders
◆◆ Waterborne:
◆◆ Re-engineer and repair the decaying lock infrastructure on the Ohio River
◆◆ Dredge the areas around ports and waterways on the Ohio River
◆◆ Build additional/better railroad access to Indiana ports
46
◆◆ General:
◆◆ Tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to USDOT
◆◆ The value of U.S. imports and exports is expected to be equivalent to 60 percent of GDP by 2030
◆◆ Work for diversification of exports/imports
THREATS:
◆◆ Air:
◆◆ Continued underutilization of Southeast Region airports
◆◆ Dependence on increasing bottlenecks leading to inefficient air cargo service
◆◆ Lack of state funding to meet infrastructure needs
◆◆ Rail:
◆◆ Continuation of the Southeast Region as a pass through area for rail
◆◆ Reliance on surrounding cities for intermodal services
◆◆ Surrounding states pushing for rail investment
◆◆ Lack of Class 1 rail access to major industrial sites
◆◆ Trucking (Roads):
◆◆ Lack of funding to build roads to relieve bottle necks or traffic congestion
◆◆ Lack of funding to upgrade Southeast Region strategic bridges that are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete
◆◆ Waterborne:
◆◆ Failure of decaying lock infrastructure, leading to stoppage of all barge traffic on Ohio River
◆◆ Inability to provide necessary access by not dredging the Ohio River
◆◆ Loss of business due to inadequate railroad access to ports
◆◆ General:
◆◆ Lack of diversification of exports/imports
◆◆ Lack of funding for all infrastructure modes
◆◆ Impact of Federal Government energy policy on all modes of transportation
47
PUBLIC POLICY SWOT
STRENGTHS:
◆◆ Air:
◆◆ Federal Government reimburses up to 90 percent of costs for qualified airport projects
◆◆ Local funding of all Southeast Region airports
◆◆ Rail:
◆◆ Ports of Indiana bonding authority for rail facilities
◆◆ Local rail investment
◆◆ Industrial Rail Service Fund
◆◆ Trucking (Roads):
◆◆ P3 funding for Indiana highways and roads
◆◆ State of Indiana focus on road construction
◆◆ Waterborne:
◆◆ Ports of Indiana (public and private): Jeffersonville
◆◆ Ports of Indiana bonding authority for port activity
◆◆ General:
◆◆ Indiana’s use of public/private partnerships to facilitate the funding of key projects in the Southeast Region
◆◆ Transportation and Logistics Tax Credit
◆◆ Tax abatement for vacant buildings
WEAKNESSES:
◆◆ Air:
◆◆ Lack of true Indiana regional airport for freight
◆◆ Lack of “ownership” by public entities on air freight movement
◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding for the Southeast Region
◆◆ Pilot shortages
◆◆ Airline pilot duty and entry level requirements for flight time
48
◆◆ Rail:◆◆ Continued need for private rail investment compared to surrounding states◆◆ Lack of “ownership” by public entities on rail freight movement◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding◆◆ Railroad employee hours of service requirements
◆◆ Trucking (Roads):
◆◆ Federal/State use of gas taxes for other general Federal/State revenue needs
◆◆ Lower truck weight limits compared to Kentucky
◆◆ Inefficiencies in collection of fuel taxes
◆◆ Changes to Hours of Service regulations
◆◆ Truck driver shortages
◆◆ Waterborne:
◆◆ Use of Harbor Maintenance Tax for other general Federal revenue needs
◆◆ Lack of “ownership” by public entities of waterborne shipping
◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding
◆◆ Lack of public and legislator understanding of importance of locks infrastructure
◆◆ Boat pilot time requirements
◆◆ Barge captain shortages
◆◆ General:
◆◆ Increase in unemployment insurance (UI) tax on State level
OPPORTUNITIES:
◆◆ Air:
◆◆ Dedicated air fund creating more Federal funding
◆◆ Rail:
◆◆ Federal and State investment tax credit incentivizing private rail investment
◆◆ Funding for inter/multimodal rail development
49
◆◆ Trucking (Roads):
◆◆ Federal and State firewall on gas taxes for highway use only
◆◆ Dedicated truck lanes on I-65
◆◆ Allow increase of truck weight limits at Kentucky and Ohio borders
◆◆ Use of state sales tax on gasoline
◆◆ New innovative funding mechanisms for roads
◆◆ Waterborne:
◆◆ Adequate funding for locks projects
◆◆ Federal firewall on Harbor Maintenance Tax for waterways use only
◆◆ Harbor Assistance Program to incentivize ports and private investments
◆◆ General:
◆◆ Lower UI tax on State level
◆◆ Lower capital gains tax on Federal level◆◆ Reduction of personal property tax
THREATS:◆◆ Air:
◆◆ Surrounding state of Tennessee offers grants/loans/tax credits for air economic development/private investment
◆◆ Loss of matching dollars from Federal Government because of lack of State investment
◆◆ Federal cap and trade legislation/regulation
◆◆ Rail:
◆◆ Surrounding states of Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee offer grants/loans/tax credits for rail economic development/private investment
◆◆ Federal cap and trade legislation/regulation
◆◆ Trucking (Roads):◆◆ Surrounding states of Illinois, Ohio, and Tennessee offer grants/loans/tax credits for
trucking economic development/private investment◆◆ Lack of Federal/State highway dollars for new/existing roads◆◆ Continued use of gas taxes for other general Federal/State revenue needs◆◆ Competitiveness issues due to higher truck weight limits in Illinois and Kentucky◆◆ Continued inefficient collection of fuel taxes◆◆ Federal cap and trade legislation/regulation
50
◆◆ Waterborne:
◆◆ Surrounding states of Ohio and Tennessee offer grants/loans/tax credits for waterborne economic development/private investment
◆◆ Continued use of waterways taxes for other general Federal revenue needs
◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding for locks infrastructure repair
◆◆ Warehousing/Distribution:
◆◆ Surrounding states of Ohio and Kentucky offer grants/loans/tax credits for warehousing/real estate economic development/private investment
◆◆ Further State tax increases for UI
◆◆ Lack of speculative buildings for warehousing/distribution in Southeast Region
◆◆ Current use of vacant warehouse/distribution facilities
◆◆ General:
◆◆ Lack of policy action leading to loss of private investment
◆◆ Lack of a State funds for unexpected economic development infrastructure needs
◆◆ Continued lack of growth in national economy
51
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SWOT
STRENGTHS:◆◆ Public/private postsecondary institutions with ability to reach mass of workers
◆◆ Entrepreneurs creating online curriculum programs
◆◆ State Government officials who understand importance of up-skilling Hoosier workers
◆◆ Growth of logistics firms in the Southeast Region
WEAKNESSES:
◆◆ Lack of skilled workers
◆◆ Public misconception of warehouse jobs
◆◆ Assorted logistics education curriculum not meeting industry needs
◆◆ Air cargo pilot, truck driver, and boat captain shortages
◆◆ Warehouse/Logistics maintenance technician shortages
◆◆ 4-year logistics degree supervisor shortages
◆◆ Lack of fork lift certifications
OPPORTUNITIES:◆◆ Identify logistics job skills gap areas
◆◆ Curriculum development with postsecondary education to meet job skills gap areas
◆◆ Create online program to up-skill Indiana logistics workers from places of employment
◆◆ Continued growth of logistics jobs in the Southeast Region
◆◆ Connect to surrounding states’ job training programs
THREATS:
◆◆ Loss of logistics economic development due to workforce gaps
◆◆ Continued perception of logistics industry as undesirable work
◆◆ Lower skill workers remaining in lower level positions
◆◆ Lack of 4-year degree student interested in logistics careers
◆◆ Lack of air cargo pilots, truck drivers, and boat captains
◆◆ Lack of warehouse logistics maintenance technicians
◆◆ Lack of 4-year logistics supervisors
52
PUBLIC AWARENESS SWOT
STRENGTHS:
◆◆ Positive visibility of trucking
◆◆ Viewed as a center for surrounding major cities
◆◆ Easy access to all four modes of transportation
◆◆ Unified regional support for bi-state cooperation
WEAKNESSES:
◆◆ Lack of public understanding of logistics
◆◆ Lack of public understanding of need for infrastructure expansion/improvement
◆◆ Public misperception of logistics jobs
◆◆ Public misperception of global trade & positive impact on the Southeast Region
◆◆ Lack of awareness of importance for air, rail & water transportation modes
OPPORTUNITIES:
◆◆ Educate public on positive impacts of logistics industry
◆◆ Explain the facts on how the logistics industry impacts everyday life
◆◆ Educate public on need for infrastructure expansion/improvement
◆◆ Educate public on high-skill, high-wage jobs in logistics
◆◆ Educate public on positive impacts of global trade
◆◆ Increase understanding of importance for air, rail & water transportation modes
THREATS:
◆◆ Continued public misperception of the importance of the logistics industry
◆◆ Lack of awareness of need for infrastructure expansion/improvement
◆◆ Continued public misperception of logistics jobs
◆◆ Continued public misperception of road and rail congestion to quality of life
◆◆ Lack of awareness of positive impacts of global trade
53
SOUTHEAST REGION INFRASTRUCTURE DATA
◆◆ Air
◆◆ 12 Southeast Public Airports
◆◆ Two of Top 125 Cargo Airports Nationally: Louisville International Airport #3 and Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport #9
◆◆ #1 UPS Hub at Louisville International Airport
◆◆ One Airport with 11,890 Feet or More of Runway – Louisville International Airport
◆◆ Rail
◆◆ Two Class I Railroads
◆◆ Seven Class II and III Railroads
◆◆ Two Intermodal Facilities
◆◆ Trucking:
◆◆ Five Major Interstates and 5 Major Highways: I-65, I-64, I-74, I-265, I-275, US 31, US 50, Us 52, US 150, US 421
◆◆ Reputation as “Crossroads of America”
◆◆ Proximity to UPS Distribution Hub at Louisville International Airport
◆◆ Waterborne
◆◆ One Public Port on the Ohio River
◆◆ 30 Private Ports on the Ohio River
FOR MORE INFORMATION
CONTACT:
DAVID W. HOLT Vice President Operations & Business Development
Conexus Indiana111 Monument Circle
Suite 1800Indianapolis, IN 46204
Phone: (317)638-2108email: [email protected]
www.conexusindiana.com
Brought to you in part by
111 Monument Circle, Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 317-638-2108
www.conexusindiana.com