Southeast Polk
15
Southeast Polk District Achievement Data Profile 2011-2012
description
Southeast Polk. District Achievement Data Profile 2011-2012. Interpreting the New Assessments. Grades 3-7 In reading, the average student in 2011 outperformed the average student in 2000. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Southeast Polk
Southeast PolkDistrict Achievement Data Profile
2011-2012
Interpreting the New Assessments
Grades 3-7 In reading, the average student in 2011 outperformed
the average student in 2000. In math, students at all performance levels (low,
average and high) in 2011 outperformed students in 2000.
In language, students in 2011 in grades 3 to 5 tended to outperform students in 2000.
In science, all students in 2011 generally outperformed students in 2000.
Grades 8-11 performance of all students in 2011 was comparable to
that of students in 2000
Trend DataWhat is the impact of core instruction on
achievement levels for students?
Reading Comprehension
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110102030405060708090
100
Profi
cien
t
Math
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110102030405060708090
100
Profi
cien
t
Science
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110102030405060708090
100
Profi
cien
t
Cohort DataAre our students making growth?
Reading Comprehension
3rd-4th
4th-5th
5th-6th
6th-7th
7th-8th
8th-9th
9th-10th
10th-11th
0102030405060708090
10086 89 87
75 78 74 78 7383 78
70 71 6884 84 85
2010-2011 2011-2012
Math
3rd-4th
4th-5th
5th-6th
6th-7th
7th-8th
8th-9th
9th-10th
10th-11th
0102030405060708090
100 90 91 85 84 80 75 74 7186 84 83 83
6782 85 85
2010-2011 2011-2012
Science
3rd-4th
4th-5th
5th-6th
6th-7th
7th-8th
8th-9th
9th-10th
10th-11th
0102030405060708090
100 91 90 9080 85 85 82 83
9383 81
72 7382 83 85
2010-2011 2011-2012
Baseline Data
Written Expression
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th11th0
102030405060708090
10085 87 81
66 66 64
84 83 81
2011-2012
2011-2012
Celebrations Trend growth at 3 grade levels in reading and 4
grade levels in math. Cohort growth at 3 grade levels in reading and 3
grade levels in math. 8 data points demonstrated double-digit growth. Strong data in written expression reflects focus
on writing. Strong proficiency and growth at schools with
poverty and language challenges.
Implications Review support structures Review program of studies Test administration—Spring for Iowa Tests
Actions Implement assessment plan that provides ongoing
feedback related to learning goals. Design intervention plans for students at risk of
meeting learning goals Implement new curriculum units with attention to
possibilities of differentiation Increase the explicitness of instruction for students
not meeting goals or not making progress Increase opportunities for reading, writing, and
problem-solving across all content areas.
