South Dakota Department of Education Spring 2011.
-
Upload
barbara-parks -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of South Dakota Department of Education Spring 2011.
South Dakota
Department of EducationSpring 2011
Outcomes of WebinarUnderstanding of purpose of Common Core
State Standards (CCSS) and why SD adopted the standards
Understanding of professional development for the 2011-2012 school year
Reflect upon who should attend the workshop series
Outline activities that participants could complete to prepare for the workshops
Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
The Standards define the knowledge and
skills students should have so they will graduate from
high school to succeed in
postsecondary education and
careers.
K-12 Standards
• Mathematics
• English Language Arts
Who Developed the Common Core State Standards
National Governor’s Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), working with Achieve, ACT and the College Board, among others.
State departments of education specialists and teachers, including those in South Dakota, were involved in an extensive feedback and review process.
Released to the public on June 2, 2010.South Dakota BOE adopted these standards at their
November 2010 meeting.
Why the CC State Standards Improve education of student
Close the gap in preparedness for college and careers
Prepare students to compete in global economy
Shared understanding of what students are expected to learn, no matter where they live or how often they move
CC State Standards TimelineP
rofe
ssio
nal
Dev
elop
men
t
Pro
fess
ion
al D
evel
opm
ent
Pro
fess
ion
al D
evel
opm
ent
New
CC
SS
Ass
essm
ent
Assessment Plan for Each Year Year 1 2011-2012 Year 2 2012-2013 Year 3 2013-2014 2014-2015
D-STEP covers current SD standards-Districts would receive the same accountability report as usual Common Core Field Test Questions-Implement 20 questions for each content area based on focus standards-District would receive an additional report based on common core field test questions-Items are not part of AYP
D-STEP covers current SD standards-Districts would receive the same accountability report as usual Common Core Field Test Questions-Implement 40 questions for each content area based on focus standards-District would receive an additional report based on common core field test questions-Items are not part of AYP
D-STEP covers current SD standards-Districts would receive the same accountability report as usual Common Core Field Test Questions-Implement 40 questions for each content area based on focus standards-District would receive an additional report based on common core field test questions-Items are not part of AYP
New Common
Core Assessment
Future CC Assessment
Common Core State Standards
specify K-12 expectations for
college and career
readiness
Common Core State Standards
specify K-12 expectations for
college and career
readiness
All students leave high school college and career ready
All students leave high school college and career ready
Teachers can accessformative processes
and tools to improve instruction
Teachers can accessformative processes
and tools to improve instruction
Interim assessments that are flexible, open,
and provide actionable feedback
Interim assessments that are flexible, open,
and provide actionable feedback
Summative assessments
benchmarked to college and career
readiness
Summative assessments
benchmarked to college and career
readiness
Assessment System ComponentsAssessment system that balances summative, interim, and formative components for
ELA and mathematics: Summative Assessment
• Comprehensive assessment in ELA and math in grades 3–8 and 11 that supports accountability and measures growth along a learning continuum
• Computer adaptive tests with selected response, short- and extended-constructed response, and technology enhanced items (within 12 week window at end of year)
• Performance tasks (2 per year in each subject) Interim Assessment
• Optional comprehensive and content-cluster assessments• Available throughout the year; non-secure allowing students & teachers to
review responses• Computer adaptive tests with selected response, short- and extended-
constructed response, and technology enhanced items• Performance tasks
Formative Processes and Tools • Optional resources for improving instruction and learning• Support for assessment literacy
South Dakota’s VisionProvide educators with a systemic model to implement the Common Core within a learning environment rich in collaboration, communication, creativity and critical thinking.
SD FocusProvide professional development
opportunity focusing on a framework and process to:
Gain an awareness of the focused standards
Develop a deep understanding of the focused standards
Learn a process to take standards from written words on paper to action in the classroom
What the PD is:Voluntary for educators to participate not
mandated by the stateDistricts make the decision on who to send not the
stateDistricts will decide how to implement not
prescribe one method of implementation Jump-start to district level conversation and
training to implement the CCSSCombination of online and face to face workshops
Process not an event or finished product
Focus Standards for Each Year Year 1 2011-2012
K-12 ELA Strands Reading for LiteratureReading for Information Text
Standards for Mathematical Practices
K-5 Math DomainsCounting and CardinalityNumber & Operations Base 10Operations-Algebraic
6-8 Math DomainsNumber SystemsExpressions & Equations
HS Math Algebra I
Year 2 2012-2013
K-12 ELA Strands Reading FoundationsWriting
Standards for Mathematical Practices
K-5 Math DomainsNumber Operations-FractionsGeometry
6-8 Math DomainsRatios-Proportional
RelationshipsFunctionsGeometry
HS Math Geometry
Year 3 2013-2014
K-12 ELA Strands LanguageListening, Speaking
Standards for Mathematical Practices
K-5 Math Domains Measurement & Data
6-8 Math DomainsStatistics – Probability
HS Math Algebra II and Statistics
Professional Development PlanMust attend all three phasesEarn 3 credits Three locations: Aberdeen, Rapid City, Sioux Falls 150 seats for K-6 teachers each location75 seats for grades 6-8 ELA teachers each location75 seats for grades 6-8 Math teachers each
location75 seats for grades 9-12 ELA teachers each
location75 seats for Algebra teachers each location
Phase I – 1 Day Workshop
Phase II – 2 Day Workshop
Pilot in Summer of 2011Register by May 1: Nomination process Who should attend: Teacher LeadersPurpose: Provide feedback for fall workshop
LocationGrade Span
Maximum # of TeachersProfessional Development
Date(s) of Face-to-Face
Workshop
PierreK-12
teachers
80 K-6 teachers
40 ELA grade 6-8 teachers40 Math grade 6-8 teachers
40 ELA grade 9-12 teachers40 Math grade 9-12 teachers
Phase I July 7
Phase II July 19 & 20
Phase III Aug. 8 & 9
Register online: http://doe.sd.gov
Who should attend?Fall Workshops
Option 1: Send a team of 2-3 for each grade span who will come back and facilitate district teachers pdOption 2: Send a single teacher leader or administrator who will come back and facilitate district teachers pdOption 3: Send implementation team of administrators and teachers Option 4: Send a consortium of teachers from multiple district to come back and facilitate pd
Preparing for the workshopsReview Common Core State Standards
Review ‘Cracking the Code’ ppt.Review Crosswalk documentBecome familiar with SD DOE CC website Begin to think about how to plan for
implementation
http://doe.sd.gov/octe/commoncoreStandards.asp
Underlying OutcomesProvide teachers with a hands on experience
to gain a deeper understanding of the standards;
Investigate how the Common Core standards impact teaching practices;
Learn about the Common Core standards starting with the end in mind, how the standards can be assessed, working through curriculum planning;
Give teachers opportunities to collaborate with other teachers from their grade levels as they understand Common Core standards;
Emphasize standards-driven curriculum;
Utilize Standards in Practice® theory and Understanding by Design model to gain model units of how to teach the standards that illustrate the vision;
Connecting relevant initiatives and the 4 Rs (rigor, relevance, relationships, results).