Source of - Zendesk · of the Manual is available on the EPA Inspectors Website at ... HQ-Good Lab....

“Revised Inspection Conclusion Data Sheet (ICDS) Manual” from Michael Stahl, Director, Office of Compliance. Print copies of the Manual were distributed to the Regional and Headquarters offices following the e-mail. An electronic copy of the Manual is available on the EPA Inspectors Website at http://intranet.epa.gov/inspector. We encourage inspectors to get as many facilities as possible to take compliance actions during inspections. Success stories will be featured in our Inspector Newsletter and discussed in future National EPA Inspector Workshops.

During FY 2007, ICDS data was requested for all compliance monitoring

inspections conducted by EPA inspectors, Senior Environmental Employees (SEEs), and EPA contractors. Analysis of FY 2007 ICDS data showed that inspectors communicated deficiencies to 7,693 facilities. Of this number, 1,350 facilities took corrective action. Thus, 18% of all the facilities inspected subject to the ICDS reporting requirement and for which inspectors communicated deficiencies during the inspection/evaluation took complying action during the inspection/evaluation. The final percentage result increased from 17% in FY 2006 to 18% in FY 2007. Also, the actual number of facilities that took action increased from 1,234 to 1,350.

Source of Information The Regions submitted and certified the FY 2007 EOY ICDS data. Headquarters

offices manually reported the results for CAA-Mobile Sources, CAA-Woodheater, TSCA/FIFRA Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs), and the Core TSCA program.

End-of-Year Results Attachments 1, 2, and 3 present the FY 2007 EOY results by Region and by

program. Attachment 1 Attachment 1 presents the percentage of facilities subject to the ICDS reporting

requirement where the inspector identified and communicated deficiencies (potential violations) during on-site inspections/evaluations. We have listed the percentages of facilities by Region and by program.

http://intranet.epa.gov/inspector

2

The overall percentage of inspected facilities for which the inspector communicated the deficiencies was 39%. The percentage for each program is as follows:

CAA-112r 56% CAA-Stationary 34% CAA-Mobile Sources 61% CWA-311 SPCC/FRP 63% CWA-NPDES (Excl. Pret.) 58% CWA-Pretreatment 40% CWA-404 Wetlands 44% EPCRA 313 29% EPCRA non-313 38% FIFRA 24% RCRA Hazardous Waste 47% RCRA UST 51% SDWA PWSS 69% SDWA UIC 26% TSCA-Lead based Paint 34% TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) 48% HQ-CAA Mobile Sources 23% HQ-CAA Woodheater 100% HQ-Good Lab. Practices 45% HQ-Core TSCA 18%

Attachment 2 Attachment 2 presents the percentage of facilities subject to the ICDS reporting requirement that took complying actions to address identified deficiencies (potential violations) communicated by the inspector during on-site inspections/evaluations. We have listed the percentages of facilities by Region and by program. The overall percentage of facilities that took complying actions to address deficiencies communicated by the inspector during an on-site inspection/evaluation was 18%. The percentage for each program is as follows:

CAA-112r 3% CAA-Stationary 39% CAA-Mobile Sources 7% CWA-311 SPCC/FRP 18% CWA-NPDES (Excl. Pret.) 14% CWA-Pretreatment 18% CWA-404 Wetlands 11% EPCRA 313 12% EPCRA non-313 9% FIFRA 42%

3

RCRA Hazardous Waste 42% RCRA UST 6% SDWA PWSS 10% SDWA UIC 17% TSCA-Lead based Paint 10% TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) 20% HQ-CAA Mobile Sources 8% HQ-CAA Woodheater 100% HQ-Good Lab. Practices 64% HQ-Core TSCA 25%

These numbers demonstrate that EPA inspections result in direct action taken by facilities to address potential violations.

Attachment 3 Attachment 3 presents the percentage of facilities subject to the ICDS reporting

requirement for which an inspector provided compliance assistance during on-site inspections/evaluations. We have listed the percentages of facilities by region and by program. This measure is a good indicator of how often inspections provide other benefits beyond confirming compliance and identifying non-compliance. The overall percentage of regional EPA inspections/evaluations where compliance assistance was provided was 68%. The percentage for each program is as follows:

CAA-112r 79% CAA-Stationary 48% CAA-Mobile Sources 61% CWA-311 SPCC/FRP 83% CWA-NPDES (Excl. Pret.) 59% CWA-Pretreatment 70% CWA-404 Wetlands 36% EPCRA 313 38% EPCRA non-313 59% FIFRA 33% RCRA Hazardous Waste 71% RCRA UST 67% SDWA PWSS 43% SDWA UIC 71% TSCA-Lead based Paint 84% TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) 76% HQ-CAA Mobile Sources 72% HQ-CAA Woodheater 50% HQ-Good Lab. Practices 100% HQ-Core TSCA 100%

4

These numbers demonstrate that EPA inspectors provide the regulated community with information to help them comply with environmental laws and regulations on a routine basis during inspections and evaluations.

Summary of ICDS Data From FY 2002 to FY 2007 Attachment 4 summarizes ICDS data for inspections/evaluations conducted under

those media programs subject to ICDS reporting requirements from FY 2002 through FY 2007. The table shows the number of facilities where the inspector identified and communicated deficiencies during on-site inspections/evaluations; the number of facilities that took complying actions to address the identified deficiencies communicated by the inspector during on-site inspections/evaluations; and the number of facilities for which the inspector provided compliance assistance.

Comparison of ICDS Results FY 2002 to FY 2007 Attachment 5 provides a comparison of FY 2002, FY 2003, FY 2004, FY 2005,

FY 2006, and FY2007 ICDS data. ICDS Data Collection and Reporting For more information about ICDS Collection and Reporting, please refer to the

August 21, 2007 memorandum entitled “Revised Inspection Conclusion Data Sheet (ICDS) Manual” from Michael M. Stahl, Director, Office of Compliance. It was e-mailed on August 22, 2007 to Regional and Headquarters offices with the manual attached. In addition, print copies of the manual were distributed to the Regional and Headquarters offices following the e-mail. The manual is also available on the EPA Inspectors Website at http://intranet.epa.gov/inspector.

If you have questions about this memorandum or the Attachments, please call Phyllis

Flaherty, Chief, National Compliance Monitoring Policy Branch, at 202-564-2405 or Rafael Sanchez at 202-564-7028. Thank you for your attention to this memorandum. Attachments

http://intranet.epa.gov/inspector

5

Addressee List: Regional Enforcement Coordinators, Regions 1-10 Region 1 John Blumstein Region 2 Barbara McGarry Region 3 Samantha Beers Region 4 Kelly Sisario Region 5 Tinka Hyde Region 6 Connie Overbay Region 7 Mark Hague Region 8 Art Palomares Region 9 Jim Grove Region 10 Marianne Deppman Headquarters Michael Stahl, Director, OC Lisa Lund, Deputy Director, OC Walker B. Smith, Director, OCE Randy Hill, Deputy Director, OCE Robert Kaplan, Director, SLPD, OCE Susan O’ Keefe, Associate Director, SLPD, OCE Mark Pollins, Director, WED, OCE Kate Anderson, Associate Director, WED, OCE Rosemarie Kelley, Director, WCED, OCE Don Lott, Associate Director, WCED, OCE Yvette Hellyer, Associate Director, WCED, OCE Adam Kushner, Director, AED, OCE John Fogarty, Associate Director, AED, OCE Pam Mazakas, Associate Director, AED, OCE Jacqueline Werner, Acting Chief, Mobile Sources Enforcement Branch, AED, OCE Chris Knopes, Acting Director, NPMAS, OC David Hindin, Director, ETDD, OC Betsy Smidinger, Deputy Director, ETDD, OC Kenneth Gigliello, Associate Director, CAMPD, OC James Edward, Director, CASPD, OC Karin Koslow, Associate Director, CASPD, OC Richard Colbert, Director, AD, OC Marcia Mulkey, Director, NETI Linda Flick, Deputy Director, NETI David Kling, Director, FFEO Sandra Connors, Deputy Director, FFEO Susan Bromm, Director, OSRE Elliott Gilberg, Deputy Director, OSRE R. Craig Matthiessen, Director, Regulation and Policy Development Division, OEM

6

Region 1 Stephen Perkins, Director, Office of Ecosystem Protection Susan Studlien, Director, Office of Environmental Stewardship James T. Owens, Director, Office of Site Remediation and Restoration Mike Kenyon, Director, Office of Environmental Measurement and Evaluation Region2 Dore La Posta, Director, Division of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance Barbara Finazzo, Director, Division of Environmental Science and Assessment George Pavlou, Director, Emergency and Remedial Response Division Carl-Axel Soderberg, Director, Caribbean Environmental Protection Division Region 3 James J. Burke, Director, Hazardous Waste Site Cleanup Division Judith Katz, Director, Air Protection Division Abraham Ferdas, Director, Waste and Chemicals Management Division John M. Capacasa, Director, Water Protection Division Samantha Beers, Director, Office of Enforcement, Compliance, and Environmental Justice Region 4 Beverly Banister, Director, Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division Alan Farmer, Director, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Division Franklin Hill, Director, Superfund Division Michael V. Peyton, Director, Science and Ecosystem Support Division James D. Giattina, Director, Waste Management Division Region 5 Tinka Hyde, Director, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Stephen Rothblatt, Director, Air and Radiation Division Margaret Guerriero, Director, Land and Chemicals Division Richard Karl, Director, Superfund Division Region 6 John Blevins, Director, Compliance Assurance and Enforcement Division Carl E. Edlund, Director, Multi-Media Planning and Permitting Division Samuel Coleman, Director, Superfund Division Miguel Flores, Director, Water Quality Protection Division Region 7 Mark Hague, Director, Enforcement Coordination Office Rebecca Weber, Director, Air, RCRA, and Toxics Division Cheryl Crisler, Acting Director, Environmental Services Division Cecilia Tapia, Director, Superfund Division

7

William A. Spratlin, Director, Water, Wetlands, and Pesticides Division Region 8 Eddie Sierra, Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of Enforcement, Compliance, and Environmental Justice Mike Gaydosh, Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of Technical and Management Services Carol Rushin, Assistant Regional Administrator, Ecosystems Protection & Remediation Region 9 Debbie Jordan, Director, Air Division Enrique Manazanilla, Director, Communities and Ecosystem Division Jane Diamond, Director, Policy and Management Division Keith Takata, Director, Superfund Division Jeff Scott, Director, Waste Management Division Alexis Strauss, Director, Water Division Region 10 Daniel D. Opalski, Director, Office of Environmental Cleanup Rick Albright, Director, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics Mike Gearheard, Director, Office of Water and Watersheds Bill Riley, Director, Office of Environmental Assessment Mike Bussell, Director, Office of Compliance and Enforcement NEIC Diana Love, Director, NEIC

Attachment 1 Percentage of Inspected Facilities For Which the Inspector Communicated the Deficiencies During On-Site Inspections/Evaluations *

R E G I O N

Obs. Def. CAA 112 (r) Evals., %

Obs. Def. CAA Stationary Evals., %

Obs. Def. CAA Mobile Sources Evals., %

Obs. Def. CWA-311 SPCC/ FPR, %

Obs. Def., CWA-NPDES (excl. Pret.) Insps., %

Obs. Def. CWA Pre- treatment (ind. user), %

Obs. Def. CWA 404 Wetlands, %

Obs. Def. EPCRA 313, %

Obs. Def. EPCRA non-313, %

Obs. Def., FIFRA, %

Obs. Def., RCRA Haz. Waste (Subtitle C) Insps., %

Obs. Def, RCRA UST (Subtitle I) Inspections, %

Obs. Def, SDWA PWSS, %

Obs. Def, SDWA UIC, %

Obs. Def. TSCA (Core, PCBs and Asbestos) Insps., %

Obs. Def., TSCA Lead-based Paint Insps., %

I 9/28 =32

89/223 =40

0/0 =0

107/138 =78

112/214 =52

23/35 =66

11/18 =61

12/21 =57

53/87 =61

0/20 =0

39/54 =36

49/136 =36

1/1 =100

1/1 =100

39/59 =66

106/113 =94

II 12/43 =28

37/107 =35

0/0 =0

90/146 =62

311/507 =61

10/52 =19

4/21 =192

2/10 =20

12/78 =15

16/51 =31

91/317 =29

389/822 =47

23/33 =70

4/400 =1

14/43 =33

6/140 =4

III 19/55 =35

53/204 =26

0/0 =0

20/40 =50

64/121 =53

5/17 =29

31/67 =46

17/29 =59

20/26 =77

12/25 =48

54/70 =77

133/201 =66

0/1 =0

67/2131 =3

127/235 =54

6/73 =8

IV 53/95 =56

24/99 =24

0/1 =0

84/133 =63

94/165 =57

6/9 =57

20/28 =71

1/84 =1

1/103 =1

0/7 =0

74/197 =38

43/71 =61

0/0 =0

1/1205 =0

31/48 =65

58/161 =36

V 48/63 =76

36/80 =45

2/5 =40

37/76 =49

52/73 =71

10/25 =40

13/46 =28

11/30 =37

14/16 =88

8/40 =20

133/221 =60

82/212 =39

0/0 =0

1791/2105 =85

20/51 =39

13/65 =20

VI 127/164 =77

60/118 =51

12/17 =71

81/166 =49

126/204 =62

1/2 =50

21/58 =36

21/29 =72

80/166 =48

4/8 =50

43/118 =36

19/61 =31

16/16 =100

0/592 =0

6/19 =32

3/25 =12

VII 25/40 =63

25/59 =42

0/0 =0

45/86 =52

99/163 =61

3/7 =43

1/4 =25

1/7 =14

0/0 =0

1/2 =50

143/214 =67

178/324 =55

0/0 =0

40/140 =29

1/7 =14

81/100 =81

VIII 27/73 =37

3/60 =5

0/0 =0

58/63 =92

24/66 =36

3/3 =100

1/2 =50

1/19 =5

4/30 =13

7/88 =8

12/143 =8

23/68 =34

0/5 =0

32/795 =4

36/59 =61

58/252 =23

IX 24/58 =41

16/65 =25

0/0 =0

53/80 =66

32/82 =39

1/5 =20

20/29 =69

9/25 =36

28/58 =48

7/14 =50

74/97 =76

96/155 =62

0/2 =0

17/158 =11

1/25 =4

14/87 =16

X 27/47 =57

38/99 =38

0/0 =0

42/53 =79

161/264 =61

0/0 =0

16/40 =40

1/8 =13

21/52 =40

9/16 =56

54/89 =61

143/222 =64

0/0 =0

3/29 =10

8/39 =21

16/34 =47

Total 371/666 =56

381/1114 =34

14/23 =61 617/981

=63

1075/1859 =58

62/155 =40

138/313 =44

76/262 =29

233/616 =38

64/271 =24

717/1520 =47

1155/2272 =51

40/58 =69

1956/7556 =26

283/585 =48

361/1050 =34

* Deficiencies are defined as potential violations

Headquarters Operated Program Results Percentage of Inspected Facilities For Which the Inspector Communicated the Deficiencies During On-Site Inspections/Evaluations

Observed & Communicated Deficiencies, CAA -Mobile SourcesEvaluations, and Percentage, %

Observed & Communicated Deficiencies, GLP Evaluations, and Percentage, %

Observed & Communicated Deficiencies, TSCA Core Evaluations, and Percentage, %

Observed & Communicated Deficiencies, CAA Woodheater, and Percentage, %

HQ 105/452=23 39/86=45 4/22=18 2/2=100

Attachment 1(Continuation) Regional and Headquarters Summary on the Percentage of Facilities For Which the Inspector Communicated the Deficiencies During On-site Inspections/Evaluations

REGION

Total # Inspected Facilities For Which The Inspector

Communicated the Deficiencies

Total # of Media Program On-site Inspections

Subject to ICDS Reporting Requirement

Percentage

I 651 1148 57% II 1021 2770 37% III 628 3295 19% IV 490 2406 20% V 2270 3108 73% VI 620 1763 35% VII 643 1153 56% VIII 289 1726 17% IX 392 940 42% X 539 992 54% HQ-CAA Mobile Sources 105 452 23% HQ CAA Woodheater 2 2 100% HQ-Good Lab. Practices 39 86 45%

HQ-Core TSCA 4 22 18% Total 7693 19863 39%

Summary by Media Program on the Percentage of Facilities For Which the Inspector Communicated the Deficiencies During On-site Inspections/Evaluations

Media Program Total # Inspected Facilities For Which The Inspector Communicated the Deficiencies

Total # of Media Program On-site Inspections Subject to ICDS Reporting Requirement

Percentage

CAA - 112r 371 666 56% CAA - Stationary 381 1114 34% CAA – Mobile Sources 14 23 61% CWA - 311 SPCC/FRP 617 981 63% CWA - NPDES (Excl. Pret.) 1075 1859 58% CWA - Pretreatment 62 155 40% CWA - 404 Wetlands 138 313 44% EPCRA 313 76 262 29% EPCRA non-313 233 616 38% FIFRA 64 271 24% RCRA Hazardous Waste 717 1520 47% RCRA UST 1155 2272 51% SDWA PWSS 40 58 69% SDWA UIC 1956 7556 26% TSCA - Lead based Paint 361 1050 34% TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) 283 585 48% HQ-CAA Mobile Sources 105 452 23% HQ-CAA Woodheater 2 2 100% HQ-Good Lab. Practices 39 86 45% HQ-Core TSCA 4 22 18% Total 7693 19863 39%

Attachment 2 Percentage of Facilities that Took Complying Actions to Address Identified Deficiencies Communicated by the Inspector During On-Site Inspections/Evaluations*

R E G I O N

Action Taken Def. CAA 112 (r) Evaluations, %

Action Taken Def. CAA Stationary Evals., %

Action Taken Def. CAA Mobile Sources Evals., %

Action Taken Def. CWA-311 SPCC/ FPR, %

Action Taken Def., CWA-NPDES (excl. Pret.) Inspections, %

Action Taken Def. CWA Pre- treatment (ind. user), %

Action Taken Def. CWA 404 Wetlands, %

Action Taken Def. EPCRA 313, %

Action Taken Def. EPCRA non-313, %

Action Taken Def., FIFRA %

Action Taken Def., RCRA Haz. Waste (Subtitle C) Inspections, %

Action Taken Def, RCRA UST (Subtitle I) Inspections, %

Action Taken Def, SDWA PWSS, %

Action Taken Def, SDWA UIC, %

Action Taken Def. TSCA (Core, PCBs and Asbestos) Insps., %

Action Taken Def., TSCA Lead-based Paint Insp., %

I 1/9= 11

57/89= 64

0/0= 0

15/107= 14

14/112= 13

2/23= 9

0/11= 0

9/12= 75

9/53= 17

0/0= 0

14/39= 36

9/49= 18

0/1= 0

0/1= 0

4/39= 10

2/106= 2

II 1/12= 8

14/37= 38

0/0= 0

14/90= 16

34/311= 11

5/10= 50

0/4= 0

0/2= 0

2/12= 17

10/16= 63

34/91= 37

14/389= 4

4/23= 17

4/4= 100

5/14= 36

3/6= 50

III 1/19= 5

17/53= 32

0/0= 0

3/20= 15

28/64= 44

4/5= 80

6/31= 19

0/17= 0

4/20= 20

1/12= 8

17/54= 31

3/133= 2

0/0= 0

0/67= 0

30/127= 24

2/6= 33

IV 0/53= 0

7/24= 29

0/0= 0

3/84= 4

4/94= 4

0/6= 0

1/20= 5

0/1= 0

0/1= 0

0/0= 0

20/74= 27

2/43= 5

0/0= 0

0/1= 0

4/31= 13

23/58= 40

V 1/48= 2

2/36= 6

0/2= 0

6/37= 16

8/52= 15

0/10= 0

0/13= 0

0/11= 0

3/14= 21

3/8= 38

91/133= 68

11/82= 13

0/0= 0

300/1791= 17

11/20= 55

0/13= 0

VI 4/127= 3

33/60= 55

1/12= 8

0/81= 0

15/126= 12

0/1= 0

3/21= 14

0/21= 0

0/80= 0

2/4= 50

11/43= 26

1/19= 5

0/16= 0

0/0= 0

3/6= 50

0/3= 0

VII 1/25= 4

9/25= 36

0/0= 0

3/45= 7

23/99= 23

0/3= 0

0/1= 0

0/1= 0

0/0= 0

1/1= 100

48/143= 34

4/178= 2

0/0= 0

20/20= 100

0/1= 0

0/81= 0

VIII 0/27= 0

2/3= 67

0/0= 0

7/58= 12

1/24= 4

0/3= 0

0/1= 0

0/1= 0

0/4= 0

3/7= 43

2/12= 17

1/23= 4

0/0= 0

4/32= 13

1/36= 3

0/58= 0

IX 3/24= 13

3/16= 19

0/0= 0

52/53= 98

4/32= 13

0/1= 0

4/20= 20

0/9= 0

4/28= 14

0/7= 0 58/74=78 19/96=

20 0/0= 0

8/17= 47

0/1= 0

0/14= 0

X 0/27= 0

5/38= 13

0/0= 0

6/42= 14

17/161= 11

0/0= 0

1/16= 6

0/1= 0

0/21= 0

7/9= 78

9/54= 17

8/143= 6

0/0= 0

0/3= 0

0/8= 0

7/16= 44

Total 12/371=

3 149/381= 39

1/14= 7

109/617= 18

148/1075= 14

11/62= 18

15/138= 11

9/76= 12

22/233= 9

27/64= 42

304/717= 42

72/1155= 6

4/40= 10

336/1956= 17

58/283= 20

37/361= 10

* Deficiencies are defined as potential violations

Headquarters Operated Program Results Percentage of Facilities that Took Complying Actions to Address Identified Deficiencies Communicated by the Inspector During On-Site Inspections/Evaluations

Action Taken, CAA-Mobile Communicated Deficiencies, and Percentage, %

Action Taken, GLP Communicated Deficiencies Percentage, %

Action Taken, TSCA Core Evaluations, and Percentage, %

Action Taken, CAA Woodheater, and Percentage, %

HQ 8/105=8 25/39=64 1/4=25 2/2=100

Attachment 2 (Continuation) Regional and Headquarters Summary on the Percentage of Facilities that Took Complying Actions To Address Identified Deficiencies Communicated by the Inspector during On-Site Inspections/Evaluations

REGION Total # of Facilities That Took Complying Actions To Address Identified Deficiencies Communicated by the Inspector

Total # Inspected Facilities For Which Inspector

Observed and Communicated the Deficiencies

Percentage

I 136 651 21% II 144 1021 14% III 116 628 18% IV 64 490 13% V 436 2270 19% VI 73 620 12% VII 109 643 17% VIII 21 289 7% IX 155 392 40% X 60 539 11% HQ-CAA Mobile Source 8 105 8%

HQ-CAA Woodheater 2 2 100% HQ-Good Lab. Practices 25 39 64%


Summary by Media Program on the Percentage of Facilities that Took Complying Actions To Address Identified Deficiencies Communicated by the Inspector during On-Site Inspections/Evaluations

Media Program

Total # of Facilities That Took Complying Actions To

Address Identified Deficiencies Communicated by

the Inspector

Total # Inspected Facilities For Which

Inspector Observed and Communicated the Deficiencies

Percentage


Attachment 3 Percentage of Facilities For Which an Inspector Provided Compliance Assistance During On-site Inspections/Evaluations

R E G I O N

CA Provided Def. CAA 112 (r) Evals., %

CA Provided Def. CAA Stationary Evals, %

CA Provided Def. CAA Mobile Sources Evals., %

CA Provided Def. CWA-311 SPCC/ FPR, %

CA Provided Def., CWA-NPDES (excl. Pret.) Insps., %

CA Provided Def. CWA Pre- treatment (ind. user), %

CA Provided Def. CWA 404 Wet- lands, %

CA Provided Def. EPCRA 313, %

CA Provided Def. EPCRA non-313, %

CA Provided Def., FIFRA, %

CA Provided Def., RCRA Haz. Waste (Subtitle C) Insps., %

CA Provided Def, RCRA UST (Subtitle I) Insps, %

CA Provided Def, SDWA PWSS, %

CA Provided Def, SDWA UIC, %

CA Provided Def. TSCA (Core, PCBs and Asbestos) Insps, %

CA Provided Def., TSCA Lead-based Paint Insps., %

I

18/28= 64

93/223= 42

0/0= 0

121/138= 88

133/214= 62

31/35= 89

12/18= 67

19/21= 90

69/87= 79

0/20= 0

40/54= 74

53/136= 39

1/1= 100

1/1= 100

42/59= 71

112/113= 99

II

26/43= 60

64/107= 60

0/0= 0

89/146= 61

251/507= 50

26/52= 50

4/21= 19

4/10= 40

3/78= 4

16/51= 31

299/317= 94

572/822= 70

19/33= 58

387/400= 97

33/43= 77

139/140= 99

III 42/55=

76 124/204= 61

0/0= 0 33/40=

83 76/121= 63

13/17= 76

23/67= 34

2/29= 7

26/26= 100

20/25= 80

37/70= 53

63/201= 31

0/1= 0

2131/2131= 100

203/235= 86

51/73= 70

IV

93/95= 98

38/99= 38

0/1= 0

123/133= 92

82/165= 50

8/9= 89

19/28= 68

11/84= 13

11/103= 11

2/7= 29

78/197= 40

15/71= 21

0/0= 0

3/1205= 0

31/48= 65

86/161= 53

V 63/63=

100 22/80= 28

1/5= 20 59/76=

78 56/73= 77

16/25= 64

0/46= 0

29/30= 97

16/16= 100

22/40= 55

204/221= 92

59/212= 28

0/0= 0

1791/2105= 85

51/51= 100

32/65= 49

VI

156/164= 95

60/118= 51

13/17= 76

159/166= 96

134/204= 66

1/2= 50

21/58= 36

0/29= 0

154/166= 93

0/8= 0

59/118= 50

8/61= 13

0/16= 0

0/592= 0

18/19= 95

24/25= 96

VII

15/40= 38

55/59= 93

0/0= 0

73/86= 85

138/163= 85

7/7= 100

0/4= 0

4/7= 57

0/0= 0

0/2= 0

207/214= 97

320/324= 99

0/0= 0

140/140= 100

4/7= 57

80/100= 80

VIII

33/73= 45

18/60= 30

0/0= 0

62/63= 98

28/66= 42

3/3= 100

0/2= 0

4/19= 21

4/30= 13

21/88= 24

8/143= 6

66/68= 97

4/5= 80

766/795= 96

45/59= 76

239/252= 95

IX

46/58= 79

16/65= 25

0/0= 0

51/80= 64

46/82= 56

4/5= 80

22/29= 76

22/25= 88

45/58= 78

0/14= 0

86/97= 89

153/155= 99

1/2= 50

149/158= 94

0/22= 0

87/87= 100

X

33/47= 70

47/99= 47

0/0= 0

48/53= 91

149/264= 56

0/0= 0

11/40= 28

5/8= 63

34/52= 65

9/16= 56

58/89= 65

212/222= 95

0/0= 0

12/29= 41

15/39= 38

27/34= 79

Total 525/666=

79 537/1114= 48

14/23= 61 818/981=

83

1093/1859= 59

109/155= 70

112/313= 36

100/262= 38

362/616= 59

90/271= 33

1076/1520= 71

1521/2272= 67

25/58= 43

5380/7556= 71

442/585= 76

877/1050= 83

Headquarters Operated Program Results Percentage of Facilities For Which an Inspector Provided Compliance Assistance During On-site Inspections/Evaluations

CA Provided, CAA-Mobile Evaluations, and Percentage, %

CA Provided, GLP Evaluations, and Percentage, %

CA Provided, TSCA Core Evaluations, and Percentage, %

CA Provided, CAA Woodheater, and Percentage, %

HQ 326/452=72 86/86=100 22/22=100 1/2=50

Attachment 3 (Continuation) Regional and Headquarters Summary on the Percentage of Facilities For Which An Inspector Provided Compliance Assistance During On-site Inspections/Evaluations

REGION Total # of Facilities For Which An Inspector Provided Compliance Assistance

Total # of Media On-site Inspections Subject to ICDS Reporting Requirement

Percentage

I 745 1148 65% II 1932 2770 70% III 2844 3295 86% IV 600 2406 25% V 2421 3108 78% VI 807 1763 46% VII 1043 1153 90% VIII 1301 1726 75% IX 728 940 77% X 660 992 67% HQ-Mobile Sources 326 452 72% HQ-CAA Woodheater 1 2 50% HQ-Good Lab. Practices 86 86 100%


Summary by Media Program on the Percentage of Facilities For Which An Inspector Provided Compliance Assistance During On-site Inspections/Evaluations

Media Program

Total # of Facilities For Which An Inspector Provided

Compliance Assistance

Total # of Media On-site Inspections Subject to ICDS Reporting Requirement

Percentage


Attachment 4

Summary on ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007 for Inspection/Evaluations Media Program Inspection / Evaluation

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

CAA-Stationary 744 830 888 1158 1140 1114

CAA-Mobile Sources 0 0 0 0 0 23

CWA-NPDES (Excluding Pretreatment)

1479 1373 2030 1931 2725 1859

TSCA-Lead based Paint 1683 1090 940 1274 1331 1050

CAA 112 (r) ** x x 742 947 558 666

CWA - 311 SPCC/FRP x x x 909 1101 981 CWA - 404 Wetlands x x x 462 421 313 CWA - Pretreatment x x x 316 260 155 EPCRA 313 x x x 325 315 262

EPCRA non-313 x x x 681 620 616

FIFRA x x x 294 267 271

RCRA Haz. Waste ** x x 1195 1502 1683 1520

RCRA UST ** x x 1193 1232 1938 2272

SDWA UIC x x x x 5980 7556 SDWA PWSS x x x x 71 58

TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) ** x x 656 797 572 585

HQ-CAA-Mobile Source x 393 801 233 309 452

HQ-CAA Woodheater x x x x 3 2

HQ-GLP* 87 85 63 81 77 86

HQ-core TSCA x x 21 x 22 22

T O T AL 3993 3771 8529 12142 19393 19863

NOTE: * Required beginning in FY 2003 ** Required beginning in FY 2004 x FY in which media program is not subject to the ICDS reporting requirement

Summary on ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007 for Deficiencies Media Program Deficiencies

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

CAA-Stationary 213 349 312 321 344 381



739 996 1082 1092 1317 1075


CAA 112 (r) ** x x 334 348 301 371

CWA - 311 SPCC/FRP x x x 508 562 617 CWA - 404 Wetlands x x x 285 204 138 CWA - Pretreatment x x x 180 88 62 EPCRA 313 x x x 87 97 76 EPCRA non-313 x x x 94 163 233 FIFRA x x x 41 32 64

RCRA Haz. Waste ** x x 547 759 865 717

RCRA UST ** x x 690 613 865 1155


TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) ** x x 271 359 273 283



HQ-GLP* 28 46 29 29 26 39

HQ-core TSCA x x 0 x 0 4

T O T AL 1598 1995 3862 5061 7167 7693


Summary on ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007 for Actions Taken Media Program Actions Taken

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

CAA-Stationary 77 121 105 107 136 149



107 135 126 110 179 148


CAA 112 (r) ** x x 63 16 33 12


EPCRA non-313 x x x 24 19 22

FIFRA x x x 8 15 27

RCRA Haz. Waste ** x x 178 260 271 304

RCRA UST ** x x 271 161 103 72

SDWA UIC x x x x 266 336

SDWA PWSS x x x x 2 4

TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) **

x x 70 64 41 58



HQ-GLP* 15 17 17 19 18 25

HQ-core TSCA x x 0 0 1

T O T AL 261 451 1137 947 1234 1350


Summary on ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007 for Compliance Assistance Media Program Compliance Assistance

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

CAA-Stationary 387 431 476 602 492 537



997 945 1173 1148 1417 1093


CAA 112 (r) ** x x 495 463 398 525


EPCRA non-313 x x x 122 360 362

FIFRA x x x 58 52 90

RCRA Haz. Waste ** x x 877 1097 1259 1076

RCRA UST ** x x 722 770 966 1521


TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) **

x x 435 535 381 442



HQ-GLP* 77 85 63 81 77 86

HQ-core TSCA x x 21 25 22 22

T O T AL 3062 2596 5534 7079 11161 13516


Attachment 5 Comparison of ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007

Trends and Analysis Based on ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007 for Deficiencies

Media Program Deficiencies, %

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 CAA - 112r x x 45 37 54 56 CAA - Stationary 29 42 35 28 30 34 CAA – Mobile Sources 0 0 0 0 0 61 CWA - 311 SPCC/FRP x x x 56 51 63 CWA - NPDES (Excl. Pret.) x x 45 37 54 58 CWA - Pretreatment x x x 57 34 40 CWA - 404 Wetlands x x x 65 48 44 EPCRA 313 x x x 27 31 29 EPCRA non-313 x x x 27 31 38 FIFRA x x x 14 26 24 RCRA Hazardous Waste x x x 14 12 47 RCRA UST x x 46 51 51 51 SDWA PWSS x x x x 55 69 SDWA UIC x x x x 27 26 TSCA - Lead based Paint 37 43 31 23 25 34 TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) x x 41 45 48 48

HQ-CAA Mobile Sources x 33 38 21 16 23


HQ-Good Lab. Practices 32 54 46 36 34 45

HQ-Core TSCA x x 0 0 0 18

NOTE: * Required beginning in FY 2003 ** Required beginning in FY 2004 *** Percentage based on the total # inspection with observed and communicated deficiencies x FY in which media program is not subject to the ICDS reporting requirement

Comparison of ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007

Trends and Analysis Based on ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007 for Actions Taken

Media Program Actions Taken, % ***

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 CAA - 112r x x 19 5 11 3 CAA - Stationary 36 35 34 33 40 39 CAA – Mobile Sources 0 0 0 0 0 7 CWA - 311 SPCC/FRP x x x 2 8 18 CWA - NPDES (Excl. Pret.) 14 14 12 10 14 14 CWA - Pretreatment x x x 12 25 18 CWA - 404 Wetlands x x x 25 6 11 EPCRA 313 x x x 11 13 12 EPCRA non-313 x x x 26 12 9 FIFRA x x x 20 47 42 RCRA Hazardous Waste x x 33 34 31 42 RCRA UST x x 39 26 12 6 SDWA PWSS x x x x 5 10 SDWA UIC x x x x 17 17 TSCA - Lead based Paint 10 15 27 22 16 10 TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) x x 26 18 15 20 HQ-CAA Mobile Sources x 80 74 0 4 8

HQ-CAA Woodheater x X x X 100 100


HQ-Core TSCA x x 0 0 0 25


Comparison of ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007

Trends and Analysis Based on ICDS Results From FY 2002 through FY 2007 for Compliance Assistance

Media Program Compliance Assistance, %

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 CAA - 112r x x 67 49 71 79 CAA - Stationary 52 52 54 52 43 48 CAA – Mobile Sources 0 0 0 0 0 61 CWA - 311 SPCC/FRP x x x 60 59 83 CWA - NPDES (Excl. Pret.) 67 69 58 59 52 59 CWA - Pretreatment x x x 60 59 70 CWA - 404 Wetlands x x x 50 43 36 EPCRA 313 x x x 31 34 38 EPCRA non-313 x x x 18 58 59 FIFRA x x x 20 19 33 RCRA Hazardous Waste x x 73 73 75 71 RCRA UST x x 61 63 50 67 SDWA PWSS x x x x 46 43 SDWA UIC x x x x 54 71 TSCA - Lead based Paint 95 77 89 74 86 84 TSCA (Core, PCB & Asbestos) x x 66 70 67 76

HQ-CAA Mobile Sources x 76 54 87 84 72



HQ-Core TSCA x x 100 100 100 100


Source of - Zendesk · of the Manual is available on the EPA Inspectors Website at ... HQ-Good Lab....

Documents

Transcript of Source of - Zendesk · of the Manual is available on the EPA Inspectors Website at ... HQ-Good Lab....