Source Control Phases I-IISource Control Phases I-II:: Main findings

Source Control Phases I-IISource Control Phases I-II:: Main findings

Facility: drinking water and sewage treatment utility in Facility: drinking water and sewage treatment utility in Apatity, Murmansk region, Russian FederationApatity, Murmansk region, Russian Federation

Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Facilities (chemical hazards - chlorine) was developed Facilities (chemical hazards - chlorine) was developed incorporating ISO 14001 approachincorporating ISO 14001 approach

Analysis of risks was performed; recommendations Analysis of risks was performed; recommendations

made to reduce facility risksmade to reduce facility risks

Facility: drinking water and sewage treatment utility in Facility: drinking water and sewage treatment utility in Apatity, Murmansk region, Russian FederationApatity, Murmansk region, Russian Federation

Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Facilities (chemical hazards - chlorine) was developed Facilities (chemical hazards - chlorine) was developed incorporating ISO 14001 approachincorporating ISO 14001 approach

Analysis of risks was performed; recommendations Analysis of risks was performed; recommendations

made to reduce facility risksmade to reduce facility risks

Phase I - 2000-2002 Chemical HazardsPhase I - 2000-2002 Chemical Hazards

Facility: Fuel Facility: Fuel Research Department (FRD) of State Research Department (FRD) of State Scientific Centre of Russian Federation “Scientific and Scientific Centre of Russian Federation “Scientific and Research Institute of Atomic Reactors” (SSC RF NIIAR)Research Institute of Atomic Reactors” (SSC RF NIIAR)

Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Facilities developed in Phase I of the Project was applied to Facilities developed in Phase I of the Project was applied to the radiation hazard facility incorporating ISO 14001 the radiation hazard facility incorporating ISO 14001 approach;approach;

Priorities for corrective actions were identified; Recommendations to enhance the safety of the facility were Recommendations to enhance the safety of the facility were

made based upon the analysis of risks made based upon the analysis of risks

Facility: Fuel Facility: Fuel Research Department (FRD) of State Research Department (FRD) of State Scientific Centre of Russian Federation “Scientific and Scientific Centre of Russian Federation “Scientific and Research Institute of Atomic Reactors” (SSC RF NIIAR)Research Institute of Atomic Reactors” (SSC RF NIIAR)

Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Facilities developed in Phase I of the Project was applied to Facilities developed in Phase I of the Project was applied to the radiation hazard facility incorporating ISO 14001 the radiation hazard facility incorporating ISO 14001 approach;approach;

Priorities for corrective actions were identified; Recommendations to enhance the safety of the facility were Recommendations to enhance the safety of the facility were

made based upon the analysis of risks made based upon the analysis of risks

Phase II – 2003-2004 Radiation HazardsPhase II – 2003-2004 Radiation Hazards

Source Control Project, Phase IIISource Control Project, Phase IIISource Control Project, Phase IIISource Control Project, Phase III

Objectives:Objectives: Verify and finalize the developed Risk Assessment Methodology Verify and finalize the developed Risk Assessment Methodology

at radiation and chemical hazardous facilities of the Industrial at radiation and chemical hazardous facilities of the Industrial North of RussiaNorth of Russia

Carry out the risk assessment and develop recommendations to Carry out the risk assessment and develop recommendations to reduce the risk at selected hazardous facilities reduce the risk at selected hazardous facilities

Sites:Sites: FSUE “CS Zvezdochka"FSUE “CS Zvezdochka"

The facility activities include nuclear submarine The facility activities include nuclear submarine decommissioning, repair and upgrade of vessels and nuclear decommissioning, repair and upgrade of vessels and nuclear submarinessubmarines

FSUE "Atomflot“ FSUE "Atomflot“ The facility maintains and repairs nuclear powered vesselsThe facility maintains and repairs nuclear powered vessels

The project is implementing by:The project is implementing by: IBRAE RAN, FSUE "Atomflot" andIBRAE RAN, FSUE "Atomflot" and FSUE “CS Zvezdochka"FSUE “CS Zvezdochka"

supporting by US Department of Energysupporting by US Department of Energy

Duration:Duration: 2005 – 20082005 – 2008

Phase III : FSUE “CS Zvezdochka“ Phase III : FSUE “CS Zvezdochka“ Phase III : FSUE “CS Zvezdochka“ Phase III : FSUE “CS Zvezdochka“

The Complex includes: Part of special quay 40 m long where a portal crane is

installed; Building for loading of transport containers with SNF; Temporary storage facility for transport containers,

and; Site for forming of special train

The technological cycle includes operations on transportation and loading of spent nuclear fuel into transport containers, storage of containers loaded with SNF, loading/unloading works and transportation of containers loaded with SNF, and deactivation operations

Onshore complex for unloading of the SNF from the decommissioned Onshore complex for unloading of the SNF from the decommissioned

submarinessubmarines

The facility maintains and repairs The facility maintains and repairs nuclear powered vessels as well as nuclear powered vessels as well as repairs reactor equipment, manages repairs reactor equipment, manages solid and liquid radioactive waste.solid and liquid radioactive waste.

Phase III : FSUE “Atomflot“Phase III : FSUE “Atomflot“Phase III : FSUE “Atomflot“Phase III : FSUE “Atomflot“

TTotalotal lengthlength of of berthageberthage is over 1 km is over 1 km 3 portal cranes including KONE3 portal cranes including KONE crane of 100

ton capacity for SNF container unloading

2 2 branch linebranch lines of s of local railwaylocal railway over 1 km long over 1 km long

Storage facility for SRW containersStorage facility for SRW containers of 400 of 400 cubic meterscubic meters

Storage facility forStorage facility for high level SRW of 216 cells

Temporary storage facility fortorage facility for LRW of 200 of 200 cubic meterscubic meters

Phase III: Project Management Phase III: Project Management PlansPlans

Phase III: Project Management Phase III: Project Management PlansPlans

PMP FSUE PMP FSUE ««CSCS ««ZvezdochkaZvezdochka»»PMP FSUE PMP FSUE ««CSCS ««ZvezdochkaZvezdochka»»

PMP FSUE PMP FSUE ««AtomflotAtomflot»»PMP FSUE PMP FSUE ««AtomflotAtomflot»»

1.1. Forming a working team,Forming a working team, distribute the functions and responsibilities

2.2. Studying of requirements of regulatory and legal Studying of requirements of regulatory and legal documentsdocuments

3.3. Planning and organization of worksPlanning and organization of works4.4. Identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessmenIdentification of hazards and preliminary risk assessment,

selection of the most hazardous scenarios to carry out a detailed quantitative risk assessment

5.5. Preparing more detailed data on selected Preparing more detailed data on selected scenarios and quantitative risk assessment

6. Making conclusions and development of the recommendations on risk management and reduction of risks in the future

1.1. Forming a working team,Forming a working team, distribute the functions and responsibilities

2.2. Studying of requirements of regulatory and legal Studying of requirements of regulatory and legal documentsdocuments

3.3. Planning and organization of worksPlanning and organization of works4.4. Identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessmenIdentification of hazards and preliminary risk assessment,

selection of the most hazardous scenarios to carry out a detailed quantitative risk assessment

5.5. Preparing more detailed data on selected Preparing more detailed data on selected scenarios and quantitative risk assessment

6. Making conclusions and development of the recommendations on risk management and reduction of risks in the future

Phase III: Preliminary Risk AssessmentPhase III: Preliminary Risk AssessmentPhase III: Preliminary Risk AssessmentPhase III: Preliminary Risk Assessment

Loss of offsite power;Loss of offsite power; Fire or eventual

overheating; Fall equipment componentFall equipment component Fall equipment component Fall equipment component

containing SFAcontaining SFA External impacts External impacts

(earthquake(earthquake forces forces, fall , fall aircraft plane)aircraft plane)

Loss of offsite power;Loss of offsite power; Fire or eventual

overheating; Fall equipment componentFall equipment component Fall equipment component Fall equipment component

containing SFAcontaining SFA External impacts External impacts

(earthquake(earthquake forces forces, fall , fall aircraft plane)aircraft plane)

The following initial events was studied:

GoalGoal: : selection of the most hazardous scenarios to carry out a detailed quantitative risk assessment

GoalGoal: : selection of the most hazardous scenarios to carry out a detailed quantitative risk assessment

Phase III: Quantitative Risk Assessment / Risk Matrix FSUE “CS Zvezdochka“/ Risk Matrix FSUE “CS Zvezdochka“

Phase III: Quantitative Risk Assessment / Risk Matrix FSUE “CS Zvezdochka“/ Risk Matrix FSUE “CS Zvezdochka“

31

2

Scenarios

No.No. Initial Event of Significant Initial Event of Significant

ScenarioScenario

ProbabilityProbability

, 1/year, 1/year

INES INES

LevelLevel

11Fall of reloading container Fall of reloading container loaded with SFAloaded with SFA

2.5·2.5·EE-2 -2 22

22Fall of a guiding device or Fall of a guiding device or cover of TC-18 containercover of TC-18 container

5·5·EE-6 -6 1 1

33 Aircraft crashAircraft crash 11··EE--77 22

Phase III: Quantitative Risk Assessment / Risk Matrix FSUE “Atomflot“/ Risk Matrix FSUE “Atomflot“

Phase III: Quantitative Risk Assessment / Risk Matrix FSUE “Atomflot“/ Risk Matrix FSUE “Atomflot“

No.No. Initial Event of Significant Initial Event of Significant

ScenarioScenario

ProbabilityProbability

, 1/year, 1/year

INES INES

LevelLevel

11Fall of transport container Fall of transport container (TUK)(TUK)

2·2·EE-2-2 22

22 FailureFailure of container carriageof container carriage -- 00

33Fall of reloading container Fall of reloading container loaded with SFAloaded with SFA

11..33··EE--33 33

22Fall of a guiding device or Fall of a guiding device or cover onto TC-18 containercover onto TC-18 container

1.21.2··EE--55 33

33Fall of technological equipment Fall of technological equipment onto the train loaded with SNFonto the train loaded with SNF

22··EE--44 33

Phase III: Phase III: Risk Assessment Methodology at HIF Risk Assessment Methodology at HIF

and Facilities Handling Radioactive/Nuclear and Facilities Handling Radioactive/Nuclear MaterialsMaterials

Phase III: Phase III: Risk Assessment Methodology at HIF Risk Assessment Methodology at HIF

and Facilities Handling Radioactive/Nuclear and Facilities Handling Radioactive/Nuclear MaterialsMaterials

• The work is implemented in accordance with the Risk The work is implemented in accordance with the Risk

Assessment Methodology developed in the framework of Assessment Methodology developed in the framework of

earlier Phase I and Phase II of the Source Control Project earlier Phase I and Phase II of the Source Control Project

(2000-2004).(2000-2004).• The Document includes detailed description of the main The Document includes detailed description of the main

stages of risk assessment, the procedures of hazards stages of risk assessment, the procedures of hazards

identification and assessment and the method of identification and assessment and the method of

corrective actions ranking in accordance with their corrective actions ranking in accordance with their

priorities and terms of execution.priorities and terms of execution.

• The work is implemented in accordance with the Risk The work is implemented in accordance with the Risk

Assessment Methodology developed in the framework of Assessment Methodology developed in the framework of

earlier Phase I and Phase II of the Source Control Project earlier Phase I and Phase II of the Source Control Project

(2000-2004).(2000-2004).• The Document includes detailed description of the main The Document includes detailed description of the main

stages of risk assessment, the procedures of hazards stages of risk assessment, the procedures of hazards

identification and assessment and the method of identification and assessment and the method of

corrective actions ranking in accordance with their corrective actions ranking in accordance with their

priorities and terms of execution.priorities and terms of execution.

Phases III Phases III

• The changes was made in order to provide better The changes was made in order to provide better

understandingunderstanding • List of federal and departmental legal documents List of federal and departmental legal documents

regulating facility activities during SNF unloading is regulating facility activities during SNF unloading is

added to the Documentadded to the Document

• The changes was made in order to provide better The changes was made in order to provide better

understandingunderstanding • List of federal and departmental legal documents List of federal and departmental legal documents

regulating facility activities during SNF unloading is regulating facility activities during SNF unloading is

added to the Documentadded to the Document

Phase III: Main FindingsPhase III: Main FindingsPhase III: Main FindingsPhase III: Main Findings

1.1. The risk assessment was performed atThe risk assessment was performed at SNF unloading SNF unloading

coastal facilities of FSUE “CS Zvezdochka" and FSUE coastal facilities of FSUE “CS Zvezdochka" and FSUE

“Atomflot"“Atomflot"

2.2. The executed risk analysis shows that the facilities have The executed risk analysis shows that the facilities have

acceptable level of safety. acceptable level of safety. 3. The conclusions were made and the recommendations

on risk management and reduction of risks in the future were developed

4.4. Work results Work results demonstratedemonstrate adaptabilityadaptability of developed of developed

methodology for radiation and chemically hazardous methodology for radiation and chemically hazardous

industrial facilitiesindustrial facilities

1.1. The risk assessment was performed atThe risk assessment was performed at SNF unloading SNF unloading

coastal facilities of FSUE “CS Zvezdochka" and FSUE coastal facilities of FSUE “CS Zvezdochka" and FSUE

“Atomflot"“Atomflot"

2.2. The executed risk analysis shows that the facilities have The executed risk analysis shows that the facilities have

acceptable level of safety. acceptable level of safety. 3. The conclusions were made and the recommendations

on risk management and reduction of risks in the future were developed

4.4. Work results Work results demonstratedemonstrate adaptabilityadaptability of developed of developed

methodology for radiation and chemically hazardous methodology for radiation and chemically hazardous

industrial facilitiesindustrial facilities