Sou Fujimoto

21
sou fujimoto was born in hokkaido, japan, on august 4th, 1971. in 1994 he graduated from the department of architecture in the faculty of engineering at the university of tokyo. he established his own architectural practice in tokyo in 2000. sou fujimoto is a lecturer at kyoto university since 2007.

Transcript of Sou Fujimoto

Page 1: Sou Fujimoto

sou fujimoto

was born in hokkaido, japan, on august 4th, 1971.in 1994 he graduated from the department ofarchitecturein the faculty of engineering at the university of tokyo.he established his own architectural practice in tokyo in 2000.sou fujimoto is a lecturer at kyoto university since 2007.

Page 2: Sou Fujimoto

house before house

Page 3: Sou Fujimoto
Page 4: Sou Fujimoto
Page 5: Sou Fujimoto
Page 6: Sou Fujimoto

House N / Sou Fujimoto

Page 7: Sou Fujimoto

A home for two plus a dog. The house itself is comprised of three shells of progressive size nested inside one another. The outermost shell covers the entire premises, creating a covered, semi-indoor garden. Second shell encloses a limited space inside the covered outdoor space. Third shell cre-ates a smaller interior space. Residents build their life inside this gradation of domain.

Page 8: Sou Fujimoto

I have always had doubts about streets and houses being separated by a single wall, and wondered that a gradation of rich domain accompanied by various senses of distance between streets and houses might be a possibility, such as: a place inside the house that is fairly near the street; a place that is a bit far from the street, and a place far off the street, in secure privacy.

Page 9: Sou Fujimoto

That is why life in this house resembles to living among the clouds. A distinct boundary is nowhere to be found, except for a gradual change in the do-main. One might say that an ideal architecture is an outdoor space that feels like the indoors and an indoor space that feels like the outdoors. In a nested structure, the inside is invariably the outside, and vice versa. My intention was to make an architecture that is not about space nor about form, but simply about expressing the riches of what are `between` houses and streets.

Page 10: Sou Fujimoto

Three nested shells eventually mean infinite nesting because the whole world is made up of infinite nesting. And here are only three of them that are given barely visible shape. I imagined that the city and the house are no different from one another in the essence, but are just different approaches to a continuum of a single subject, or different expressions of the same thing- an undulation of a primordial space where humans dwell. This is a presentation of an ultimate house in which everything from the origins of the world to a specific house is conceived together under a single method.

Page 11: Sou Fujimoto
Page 12: Sou Fujimoto
Page 13: Sou Fujimoto
Page 14: Sou Fujimoto
Page 15: Sou Fujimoto
Page 16: Sou Fujimoto

final wooden house

Page 17: Sou Fujimoto

Lumber is extremely versatile. In an ordinary wooden architecture, lumber is effectively differen-tiated according to functions in various localities precisely because it is so versatile. Columns, beams, foundations, exterior walls, interior walls, ceilings, floorings, insulations, furnishings, stairs, window frames, meaning all. However, I thought if lumber is indeed so versatile then why not create architecture by one rule that fulfills all of these functions. I envisioned the creation of new spatiality that preserves primitive conditions of a harmonious entity before various functions and roles differentiated.

Page 18: Sou Fujimoto

I thought of making an ultimate wooden architecture. It was conceived by just mindlessly stacking 350mm square.

Page 19: Sou Fujimoto

There are no separations of floor, wall, and ceiling here. A place that one thought was a floor becomes a chair, a ceiling, a wall from various positions. The floor levels are relative and spatiality is perceived differently according to one’s position. Here, people are distributed three-dimensionally in the space. This is a place like an amorphous landscape with a new experience of various senses of distances. Inhabitants discover, rather than being prescribed, various functionalities in these convolutions.

Page 20: Sou Fujimoto

There are no separations of floor, wall, and ceiling here. A place that one thought was a floor becomes a chair, a ceiling, a wall from various positions. The floor levels are relative and spatiality is perceived differently according to one’s position. Here, people are distributed three-dimensionally in the space. This is a place like an amorphous landscape with a new experience of various senses of distances. Inhabitants discover, rather than being prescribed, various functionalities in these convolutions.

Page 21: Sou Fujimoto

This bungalow no longer fits the category of wooden architecture. If wooden architecture is merely something made from wood, then wood itself surpasses the architectural procedures to directly become a “place where people live” in this bungalow. It is of an existence akin to primitive conditions before architecture. Rather than just a new architecture, this is a new origin, a new existence.