Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.
-
Upload
cuthbert-martin -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.
Sonoma County Communities
Significant GHG Reductions by 2010
Sebastopol’s Goal
30% Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Below 2000 Levels by 2008
Water Supply System
Variable Frequency Drive Pump #6
Variable Frequency Drive Pump #7
Replacement Pump #7
Pump System SCADA
Water Supply System
Analysis Water Measures
% Reduction 5.3%
Simple Pay Back 2.1
Internal Rate of Return 74%
Net Present Value $456,829
Year Net Cash Flow
2007 ($11,013)
2008 $8,345
2009 $9,118
2010 $30,433
2011 $31,246
2012 $32,079
2013 $32,933
2014 $33,808
2015 $34,705
2016 $35,625
Financial Summary
Adding HVAC
Analysis Plus HVAC
% Reduction 12.4%
Simple Pay Back 3.5
Internal Rate of Return 53%
Net Present Value $610,374
Year Net Cash Flow
2007 ($13,018)
2008 $1,010
2009 $2,337
2010 $24,219
2011 $25,614
2012 $27,043
2013 $28,508
2014 $30,010
2015 $31,549
2016 $33,126
Financial Summary
Adding Photo Voltaic Projects
Analysis Plus PV
% Reduction 23.2%
Simple Pay Back 2.8
Internal Rate of Return 69%
Net Present Value $974,466
Year Net Cash Flow
2007 ($13,018)
2008 $4,637
2009 $6,922
2010 $29,787
2011 $32,191
2012 $34,657
2013 $37,187
2014 $39,782
2015 $42,444
2016 $45,175
Financial Summary
Considering Completed Projects
Analysis Plus Completed
% Reduction 32.9%
Simple Pay Back 1.9
Internal Rate of Return 83%
Net Present Value $1,045,415
Year Net Cast Flow
2007 ($13,018)
2008 $8,362
2009 $10,763
2010 $33,747
2011 $36,273
2012 $38,864
2013 $41,522
2014 $44,248
2015 $47,045
2016 $49,914
Financial Summary
Over the Top42% GHG Reduction
Analysis Kitchen Sink
% Reduction 42.7%
Simple Pay Back 5.6
Internal Rate of Return 24%
Net Present Value $1,511,888
Year Net Cash Flow
2007 ($33,018)
2008 $8,362
2009 ($139,237)
2010 $43,740
2011 $46,506
2012 $49,343
2013 $52,253
2014 $55,238
2015 $58,299
2016 $61,438
Financial Summary
Complete Financial Picture
Pool Covers $18,738 $0 $10,087 124,470 1.9 59.2% $182,417 1.75%
Decommission Fountain $10,000 $0 $11,406 57,425 0.9 121.6% $216,937 0.81%
Boiler Replcmnt Sports Center
$72,604 $0 $4,777 58,943 15.2 7.9% $25,688 0.83%
Building HVAC $84,600 $0 $6,090 30,660 13.9 8.8% $40,340 0.43%
Addtl Lighting $46,698 $0 $11,750 57,181 4.9 24.3% $178,109 0.81%
Lift Station #1 $32,920 $0 $3,770 18,980 8.7 14.4% $43,497 0.27%
Pool Pump Measures $33,140 0 $13,340 67,160 2.5 45.2% $233,291 0.95%
Computer Network Controls
$4,138 $0 $2,500 12,586 1.7 66.0% $45,694 0.18%
PV5 $208,410 $599 $4,881 27,166 42.7 0.8% ($72,006) 0.38%
Biodiesel B20 $5,000 $0 -$224 35,163 NA NA ($9,205) 0.50%
Measure Description
Net Capital Cost
O&M incremental
Cost
Annual Cost Savings
Annual CO2 Reduction
Simple Payback
IRRNet Present
Value
% of Total GHG
The Key Information
Analysis Plan A Plan B Plan C Plan D Plan E
% Reduction 10.9% 23.2% 35.6% 42.9% 50.3%
SPB 2.1 1.1 12.4 16.5 20.1
IRR 76.6% 127.3% 15.3% 8.9% 3.4%
NPV $1,758,018 $1,517,448 $1,286,650 $979,700 ($357,822)
2007 $15,744 ($5,000) ($5,000) ($5,000) ($5,000)
2008 $21,330 $8,720 $4,436 $4,436 $4,436
2009 $43,216 $10,725 $15,394 ($50,471) ($141,716)
2010 $49,196 $26,389 $34,717 ($64,597) ($155,695)
2011 $55,383 $45,773 ($23,668) ($96,055) ($224,810)
2012 $61,783 $51,317 ($142,321) ($69,407) ($240,249)
2013 $68,406 $57,063 ($49,700) ($220,994) ($391,277)
2014 $108,060 $74,047 ($30,521) ($192,108) ($362,801)
2015 $115,149 $111,332 $9,031 ($159,583) ($330,695)
2016 $122,483 $117,721 $17,766 ($74,901) ($213,636)
2017 $130,071 $124,341 $26,809 ($55,182) ($194,351)
2018 $87,728 $142,132 $105,826 $183,602 $43,535
2019 $146,045 $69,443 $137,864 ($63,271) ($203,787)
2020 $154,449 $126,031 $94,993 $249,015 $108,040
GHG Action Plan Summary
Annual Net Cash Flow
Benefits to Financial Planning
Future Energy Cost Mitigation
$456,199
$320,762
$354,761
$332,429
$294,675
$227,161
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
$400,000
$450,000
$500,000
An
nu
al E
ner
gy
Co
st (
Fu
el, N
G, E
lec.
)
Escal. Rate N.Gas and Elec.= 3.5%
Diesel and Gas = 8%
No Action
Plan B
Plan C
Plan E
Plan A
Annual Energy Cost
Plan D
Less
Vul
nera
ble
- M
ore
Vul
nera
ble
Demonstrating Leadership
CO2 Reductions by Sector
-1,700
-1,500
-1,300
-1,100
-900
-700
-500
-300
-100
Year
CO2
(ton
s)
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
Perc
enta
ge R
educ
tion
PV
Water/Sewer
Commute
Fleet
Street Lights
Buildings
978 tons CO2e Annual Reduction
$$$ Avoided Utility Company Payments $6,776,259
$$$ Avoided Fuel Purchases $1,473,872$$$ Invested Locally in GHG Projects $5,010,979
Community Benefits over 25 year Life of Plan
Internal Rate of Return on Investment 15.3%
Net Present Value of Investment $1,286,650
MSI Integrated Solutions, Inc. Climate Protection Campaign
Other Cities
Analysis Plan C% Reduction 35.6%
SPB 12.4IRR 15.3%NPV $1,286,650
Financial Summary
City of Sonoma 37.2% GHG Reduction
Analysis Plan D% Reduction 37.2%
SPB 13.7IRR 13.6%NPV $572,494
Financial Summary
CO2 Reduction by Sector
-2,750
-2,500
-2,250
-2,000
-1,750
-1,500
-1,250
-1,000
-750
-500
-250
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Year
CO
2 (
ton
s)
-100%
-90%
-80%
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Re
du
cti
on
PV
Water/Sewer
Commute
Fleet
Street Lights
Buildings
CO2e Reduction by Sector
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
CO
2e (
ton
s)
-110%
-100%
-90%
-80%
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
PV
Water/Sewer
Commute
Fleet
Street Lights
Buildings
Per
cen
tag
e R
edu
ctio
n
Rohnert Park 35.6% GHG Reduction
Sebastopol Next Steps
•Tiered Rates Structured for Conservation
•Expanded Water Efficiency Incentives
•PAYStm Water Bill Incentive Financing
•Zero Net Gain in Water Usage for General Plan
•Berkeley Muni Bonds for efficiency and renewables
Water and Waste Water Initiatives
Sebastopol Next Steps
REFERENCES:John Rosenblum, Ph.D. for water and wastewater operations ([email protected])Ned Orrett, P.E. for end-users ([email protected])Full details in upcoming report by Climate Protection Campaign (www.climateprotectioncampaign.org) for the City of Santa Rosa
2005 WATER-RELATED GHG EMISSIONS
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
WATER SUPPLY
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
END-USERS
CO
2e /
1 M
Gal
(T
on
s)
Emissions due mainly
to home water
heating
Sebastopol Next Steps
REFERENCES:John Rosenblum, Ph.D. for water and wastewater operations ([email protected])Ned Orrett, P.E. for end-users ([email protected])Full details in upcoming report by Climate Protection Campaign (www.climateprotectioncampaign.org) for the City of Santa Rosa
GHG Savings /1 M Gallons Water Conserved
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
WATER SUPPLY
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
END-USERS
CO
2e S
ave
d
(To
ns
)
SAVINGS1.5 tons-CO2e from water/watewater operations
10.5 tons-CO2e from end-users: water heating
Coordinated Action Countywide
Sonoma County Water Agency•On track to meet all power demand from renewable sources by 2015, a Carbon reduction: 15,000 tons/year
Sonoma County Transit Authority•Developing a Comprehensive Transit Plan which will address Countywide goal of 25% GHG reduction by 2015.
Sonoma County Water Agency
Demonstrations of Leadership
• Water Reuse for Zero-net Energy Communities• Utilization of Landfill Gas for Energy • Deployment of 2 MW Photo Voltaic Capacity• Deployment of PHEVs and EVs and Bulk Purchase• Incorporation of BioDiesel in the Fleet• Exploration of Wave Energy Potential for County• Collaborations: Emerging Technologies Conference
Local Governments Taking Action
MSI Integrated Solutions, Inc. Climate Protection Campaign