Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

18
Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

description

Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis. Basic Principles. If there is no direct or indirect evidence supporting an element, the jury must conclude that the element has not been established. If there is conflicting direct evidence regarding an element, jury gets to resolve the issue. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Page 1: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Page 2: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Basic Principles

Page 3: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• If there is no direct or indirect evidence supporting an element, the jury must conclude that the element has not been established.

Page 4: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• If there is conflicting direct evidence regarding an element, jury gets to resolve the issue.

Page 5: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• Unless the other rules dictate a different result, if direct evidence and indirect evidence conflict, the jury gets to resolve the issue.

Page 6: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

“Evidence” That Does Not Count

Page 7: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• The jury must disregard direct evidence• From a witness who did not have

an opportunity to observe, or• That is physically impossible

Page 8: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• Generally, the jury must disregard a non-expert witness’s conclusions (inferences from observations).

Page 9: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Evidence That Must Be Believed

Page 10: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• Usually, a jury has the right to disbelieve direct evidence even without contradictory evidence. However . . .

Page 11: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• The jury must believe direct evidence that is• unimpeached and • uncontradicted and • from a • disinterested witness or • a source that cannot reasonably

be doubted

Page 12: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Inferences That May Not Be Drawn

Page 13: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• If there is evidence of facts from which an element could be inferred (rather than direct evidence of the element), the jury decides • whether to believe the facts &• Whether to draw the inference

• Unless no reasonable jury :• could infer the element from the

facts (under the “more likely than not” standard)

Page 14: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Dogs That Do Not Bark

Page 15: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• If the “burdened party” could produce evidence on a particular factual issue and does not do so, it may change the rules as follows:

• It may cause the judge to decide that the jury has to believe the other side’s direct evidence • even though that evidence has

been impeached or comes from an interested party.

Page 16: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

• If the “burdened party” could produce evidence on a particular factual issue and does not do so, it may change the rules as follows:

• It may cause the judge to decide that the jury cannot draw a particular inference: • even though that inference would

otherwise be reasonable.

Page 17: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Some Procedural Questions

Page 18: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

•When can one file a JAML motion?•When must one file a JAML motion if one wants to file a JNOV (deferred JAML)?• Why?

•Why is it important to file a JNOV?