Some calculations with exponential martingales
description
Transcript of Some calculations with exponential martingales
![Page 1: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Some calculations with exponential martingales
Wojciech Szatzschneider
School of Actuarial Sciences
Universidad Anáhuac México Norte
Mexico
![Page 2: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
Girsanov theorem in Practice.
Under P : physical world
if
![Page 3: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
And Risk Neutral world Q exists.
Under Q law
Always
a martingale
![Page 4: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Problem
When is true martingale and not only local martingale?
![Page 5: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Novikov:
Local martingale is true martingale if and
only if is of class (DL), if for every a>0, the family of random variables XT, (T all stopping times < a), is uniformly integrable.
martingale
Set
![Page 6: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Kazamaki
submartingale
martingale
![Page 7: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Novikov for small intervals:
for some
then martingale
![Page 8: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
… Simply note
choose
and use “Tower property”
![Page 9: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Basic fact
If under Q , is true martingale > 0 and if under P, > 0 a. e. then Q ~ P is a martingale.
If possible, we will take advantage of
![Page 10: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Change of measure
Let Yt be a process such that:
and rt = Yt.
Let Xt be a BESQ process
And consider the continuous exponential local martingale
![Page 11: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Where M(s)=Xs-s. It results that
The local martingale is bounded (Xs ≥ 0 and < 0). Therefore, Zt is a martingale, and the change of drift via the Girsanov’s theorem is justified.
![Page 12: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
At time zero (to simplify the notation), we have
![Page 13: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
We look for Fu(s) = F(s) such that F2(s)+F’(s)=2+2 for s[0, u), F(u)=.
In this part, the most suitable approach to the Riccati equation, that defines F, is via the corresponding Sturm-Liouville equation. WritingF(s)=’(s)/(s), s[0, u), (0) =1, we get
where ¯ is the left-hand side derivative.
![Page 14: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The exponential martingale that correspondsto F will be called Z,
(Z corresponds to F in the same way as to ).
![Page 15: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The solution of the equation ’’(s)/’(s)=c2 in [0,u) is clearly Aecs+Be-cs with conditions A+B=1 (because of (0)=1) and
We obtain after elementary computations,here X(0)=1, u=1.
and reproduce easily Cox, Ingersoll & Ross formula.
![Page 16: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The same method can be applied in the case of 2-2 >0 with c2=2-2.
Case 2
In this case we have
Lemma 1
![Page 17: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Lemma 2If
then, as before we have
Define
Now
![Page 18: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Proofs
i. Here and as before
Therefore
, and
![Page 19: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ii. Now
and the bounded solution exists in [0,1] (after elementary calculations) for and using (1) we obtain the result.
![Page 20: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Linear Risk Premia
We will clarify what can be done and what can not in one dimensional financial market driven by Brownian motion, and asset prices that in the RW (under the law P) follow a Geometric Brownian Motion:
![Page 21: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Set (discounted prices)
where
and is the spot IR in the RW.
![Page 22: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Now,
The RNW is defined as the probability law Q (Q ~ P), t < T that under Q
being W* another Brownian Motion.
![Page 23: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
It can be shown that if r(t) is CIR (in real world and driven by the same BM), then such Q does not exist.
An easy argument is based on explosion until T = 1 of the process defined by:
![Page 24: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
But what we really want is CIR in the RNW. We prove the following:
Theorem, If under P
Then for any T>0, there exists Q ~ P, for the process considered until time T such that under Q the interest rates follow:
![Page 25: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Longstaff Model
In 1989, Longstaff proposed the so-called double square root model defined in Risk Neutral World by:
where
![Page 26: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
In 1992 Beaglehole & Tenney showed that Longstaff’s wrong formula for Bond Prices in his model gives the correct bond prices in the case of:
![Page 27: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Longstaff uses Feynman-Kac approach and obtains the formula for bond prices of the form:
![Page 28: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
This calculations repeat all over the world in several textbooks
![Page 29: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
For some functions m,n,p and x=rt . However to apply Feynman-Kac representation, P(t,T) should be of class C2 with respect to x.
Some relaxation of this assumption is imaginable, but there is no possibility to make adjustments that could work for P(t,T). The problem is of course at zero.
![Page 30: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
We will show how to calculate:
![Page 31: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
and
iff in (0,t)
![Page 32: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
This matching procedure does not work in the original Longstaff model, it means for calculations of:
An application of Girsanov theorem leads to
![Page 33: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
CIR and intensity based approach
Our goal is to calculate
for r(s) and (s) dependent CIR processes.
![Page 34: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Assume that one can observe correlations between r(s) (default free rate), and (s) (the intensity of default). We will use very special dependence structure between r(s) and (s) that can approximately generate the correlation one, and this structure will produce explicit formulas.
![Page 35: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Our modelling is as follows:
Set:
with independent r1 and r2, 1 and 2 .
![Page 36: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Also r1 is independent of 1 .
Now set 2(t) = r2(t) for some
consequently
![Page 37: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
With the use of Pythagoras theorem define:
with the restriction that:
![Page 38: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Using a well known formula for the variance of the CIR we can write:
This method can be extended easily to multifactor CIR
![Page 39: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Model with saturation
We want to prove that
is true martingale and not only local martingale.
![Page 40: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
satisfies
The law of this process we will call P. The best way to prove that H(t) is true martingale is through some equivalences of laws of processes on , .
![Page 41: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Note that V (t) is Pearl-Verhulst model.
Let under the law Q, dV(t)=V(t)dt+V(t)dW(t). The law Q is equivalent to the law Q1. Under Q1, V(t)=eW(t)-½t.
Now, under Q1
![Page 42: Some calculations with exponential martingales](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062807/568151ad550346895dbfdbe6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
ZT is clearly true martingale and by Girsanov theorem changes the law Q1 into such that under ,
Moreover , under measure.
Therefore on , and we have proved that ZT is P martingale. The last equivalence is obvious.