Softwaretechnologie für Fortgeschrittene Teil Thaller Stunde V: Software Engineering II Köln 28....

Softwaretechnologie für FortgeschritteneTeil Thaller

Stunde V: Software Engineering II

Köln 28. Januar 2010

Design Patterns

2

(1) Eine „Kunstlehre“, die auf der Objektorientierung aufsetzt ...

(2) … so verbreitet, dass ich mir erlaubt habe, zwei sehr geringfügig modifizierte Vorlesungsfolien auswärtiger Kollegen zu benutzen.

Design PatternsCS 406 Software Engineering I

Fall 2001

Aditya P. Mathur

Purdue University

October 30, 2001

CS 406: Design Patterns 4

Organization

Patterns:

Behavioral:Observer

Structural:Façade

Creational Abstract FactoryFactory MethodSingleton

Excellent reference:

Design Patterns book by Erich Gamma, et al., Addison-Wesley, 1994.


Design Patterns [1]

• A solution to a problem that occurs repeatedly in a variety of contexts.

• Each pattern has a name.

• Use of each pattern has consequences.


Design Patterns [2]

• Generally at a “higher level” of abstraction.

• Not about designs such as linked lists or hash tables.

• Generally descriptions of communicating objects and classes.


Observer Pattern [1]

• Need to separate presentational aspects with the data, i.e. separate views and data.

• Classes defining application data and presentation can be reused.

• Change in one view automatically reflected in other views. Also, change in the application data is reflected in all views.

• Defines one-to-many dependency amongst objects so that when one object changes its state, all its dependents are notified.



A=10%B=40%C=30%D=20%

Application data

A

BC

D

A DCB

Relative Percentages

Y 10 40 30 20

X 15 35 35 15

Z 10 40 30 20

A B C D

Change notification

Requests, modifications



Subject

attach (Observer)

detach (Observer)

Notify ()

Observer

Update()

Concrete Observer

Update()

observerState

Concrete Subject

GetState()

SetState()

subjectState

observers

subject

For all x in observers{ x Update(); }

observerState= subject getState();


Class collaboration in Observer

:ConcreteSubject :ConcreteObserver-1 :ConcreteObserver-2

GetState()

Notify()

Update()

SetState()

GetState()

Update()


Observer Pattern: Observer code

class Subject;

class observer {public:

virtual ~observer;

protected:

virtual void Update (Subject* theChangedSubject)=0;

observer ();

Note the support for multiple subjects.};

Abstract class definingthe Observer interface.


Observer Pattern: Subject Code [1]

class Subject {

public:

virtual ~Subject;

protected:

Subject ();

virtual void Attach (observer*);

virtual void Detach (observer*) ;

virtual void Notify();

private:

List <Observer*> *_observers;

};

Abstract class definingthe Subject interface.


Observer Pattern: Subject Code [2]

void Subject :: Attach (Observer* o){

_observers -> Append(o);}

void Subject :: Detach (Observer* o){

_observers -> Remove(o);

}

void Subject :: Notify (){

ListIterator<Observer*> iter(_observers);

}

for ( iter.First(); !iter.IsDone(); iter.Next()) {

iter.CurrentItem() -> Update(this);

}


Observer Pattern: A Concrete Subject [1]

class ClockTimer : public Subject {

public:

virtual int GetHour();

}

virtual int GetMinutes();

virtual int GetSecond();

ClockTimer();

void Tick ();


Observer Pattern: A Concrete Subject [2]

ClockTimer :: Tick {

// Update internal time keeping state.// gets called on regular intervals by an internal timer.

}

Notify();


Observer Pattern: A Concrete Observer [1]

class DigitalClock: public Widget, public Observer {

public:

DigitalClock(ClockTimer*);

virtual ~DigitalClock();

virtual void Draw();

private:

}

ClockTimer* _subject;

virtual void Update(Subject*);Override Observer operation.

Override Widget operation.



DigitalClock ::DigitalClock (ClockTimer* s) {

_subject = s;

}

_subjectAttach(this);

DigitalClock ::~DigitalClock() {

_subject->Detach(this);

}



void DigitalClock ::Update (subject* theChangedSubject ) {

If (theChangedSubject == _subject) {

}

Draw();}

void DigitalClock ::Draw () {

int hour = _subject->GetHour();

}

int minute = _subject->GeMinute(); // etc.

Check if this is the clock’s subject.

// Code for drawing the digital clock.


Observer Pattern: Main (skeleton)

ClockTimer* timer = new ClockTimer;

DigitalClock* digitalClock = new DigitalClock (timer);


When to use the Observer Pattern?

• When an abstraction has two aspects: one dependent on the other. Encapsulating these aspects in separate objects allows one to vary and reuse them independently.

• When a change to one object requires changing others and the number of objects to be changed is not known.

• When an object should be able to notify others without knowing who they are. Avoid tight coupling between objects.


Observer Pattern: Consequences

• Abstract coupling between subject and observer. Subject has no knowledge of concrete observer classes. (What design principle is used?)

• Support for broadcast communication. A subject need not specify the receivers; all interested objects receive the notification.

• Unexpected updates: Observers need not be concerned about when then updates are to occur. They are not concerned about each other’s presence. In some cases this may lead to unwanted updates.


Facade Pattern: Problem

Client Classes

Subsystem classes

Need to communicatewith


Facade Pattern: Solution

Client Classes

Subsystem classes

Facade


Facade Pattern: Why and What?

• Need to provide a simple interface to many, often small, classes. But not necessarily to ALL classes of the subsystem.

• Façade provides a simple default view good enough for most clients.

• Facade decouples a subsystem from its clients.

• Subsystems often get complex as they evolve.

• A façade can be a single entry point to each subsystem level. This allows layering.


Facade Pattern: Participants and Communication

• Clients communicate with subsystem classes by sending requests to façade.

• Façade forwards requests to the appropriate subsystem classes.

• Clients do not have direct access to subsystem classes.

• Participants: Façade and subsystem classes


Facade Pattern: Benefits

• Promotes weak coupling between subsystem and its clients.

• Helps in layering the system. Helps eliminate circular dependencies.

• Shields clients from subsystem classes; reduces the number of objects that clients deal with.


Example: A compiler

StackMachineCodegeneratorRISCCodegenerator

Stream

BytecodeStream

CodeGenerator

Scanner Token

Parser Symbol

PnodeBuilder Pnode

ExpressionNodeStatementNode

CompilerCompile()

Invocations


Façade Pattern: Code [1]class Scanner {

public:

Scanner (istream&);

Private:

virtual Scanner();

istream& _inputStream;

};

virtual Token& Scan();

// Takes a stream of characters and produces a stream of tokens.


Façade Pattern: Code [2]class parser {

public:

Parser ();

virtual ~Parser()

};

virtual void Parse (Scanner&, PNodeBuilder&);

// Builds a parse tree from tokens using the PNodeBuilder.


Façade Pattern: Code [3]class Pnodebuilder {

public:

Pnodebuilder ();

virtual Pnode* NewVariable (

) const;

Char* variableName

// Builds a parse tree incrementally. Parse tree // consists of Pnode objects.

virtual Pnode* NewAssignment (

) const;

Pnode* variable, Pnode* expression

// Node for a variable.

// Node for an assignment.

// Similarly...more nodes.Private:

Pnode* _node;

};


Façade Pattern: Code [4]class Pnode {

public:

// An interface to manipulate the program node and its children.

PNode();

protected:

};

virtual void GetSourcePosition (int& line, int& index);

// Manipulate program node.

virtual void Add (Pnode*);

// Manipulate child node.

virtual void Remove (Pnode*);// ….

virtual void traverse (Codegenerator&); // Traverse tree to generate code.


Façade Pattern: Code [5]class CodeGenerator {

public:

// Generate bytecode.

virtual void Visit (StatementNode*);

// Manipulate program node.

// ….

virtual void Visit (ExpressionNode*);

Protected:

CodeGenerator (BytecodeStream&);

};

BytecodeStream& _output;


Façade Pattern: Code [6]void ExpressionNode::Traverse (CodeGenerator& cg) {

cg.Visit (this);

ListIterator<Pnode*> i(_children);

For (i.First(); !i.IsDone(); i.Next();{

i.CurrentItem()Traverse(cg);

};

};


Façade Pattern: Code [7]class Compiler {

public:

// Façade. Offers a simple interface to compile and// Generate code.

Compiler();

}virtual void Compile (istream&, BytecodeStream&);

void Compiler:: Compile (istream& input, BytecodeStream& output) {

Scanner scanner (input);

PnodeBuilder builder;

Parser parser;

parser.Parse (scanner, builder);

RISCCodeGenerator generator (output);

Pnode* parseTree = builder.GetRootNode();parseTreeTraverse (generator);

}

Could also take a CodeGeneratorParameter for increased generality.


Facade Pattern: Another Example from POS [1]

– Only one item can be purchased using a gift certificate.

– Hence, subsequent enterItem operations must be invalidated in some cases. (Which ones?)

– Suppose that when a new Sale is created, it will be paid by a gift certificate

• Assume that rules are desired to invalidate an action:

How does a designer factor out the handling of such rules?


Facade Pattern: Another Example [2]

• Calls to this façade are placed near the start of the methods that need to be validated.

– Example: Invoke the façade to check if a new salesLineItem created by makeLineItem is valid or not. (See page 370 of Larman.)

• It evaluates a set of rules against an operation and indicates if the rule has invalidated an operation.

• Define a “rule engine” subsystem (e.g. POSRuleEngineFacade).


Toolkits and Frameworks

Toolkit

Main body of anApplication

Calls a procedure orA method

Framework

Reuse the main body of anApplication and write the code it calls

Defines the architectureOf the application

Toolkits: Collection of related and reusable classes e.g. C++ I/O stream library

Framework: A set of cooperating classes that make up a reusable design for a specific class of applications e.g. drawing, compilers, CAD/CAM etc.


Toolkits and Frameworks

Advantages and disadvantages of using frameworks.

2. What is more difficult to design: Application, toolkit, or frameworks?

3. How do changes in framework effect an application?

1. When using frameworks, what defines the architecture of the application?

4. How do design patterns differ from frameworks?


Abstract Factory: The Problem

1. Consider a user interface toolkit to support multiple look-and-feel standards.

2. For portability an application must not hard code its widgets for one look and feel.

How to design the application so that incorporating new look and feel requirements will be easy?


Abstract Factory Pattern: Solution[1]

2. This class declares an interface to create different kinds of widgets.

1. Define an abstract WidgetFactory class.

3. There is one abstract class for each kind of widget and concrete subclasses implement widgets for different

standards.

4. WidgetFactory offers an operation to return a new widget object for each abstract widget class. Clients call these operations to obtain instances of widgets without being aware of the concrete classes they use.


Abstract Factory: Solution[2]WidgetFactory

CreateScrollbar()

CreateWindow()

Window

ScrollBarWWidgetFactory

MacWidgetFactory

Client

WWindowMacWindow

MacScrollBar WScrollBar

One for each standard.


Abstract Factory: Solution[2]AbstractFactory

CreateScrollbar()

CreateWindow()

ConcreteFactory1

Client

ProductA1ProductA2

AbstractProductA

ProductB2 ProductB1

AbstractProductB

ConcreteFactory2

CreateProductA()

CreateProductB()


Abstract Factory Pattern: Participants and Communication

• ConcreteFactory: Implements the operations to create concrete product objects.

• AbstractProduct: Declares an interface for a type of product object.

• ConcreteProduct: Defines a product object to be created by the corresponding factory.

• AbstractFactory: Declares the interface for operations to create abstract product objects

• Client: Uses only the interface declared by the abstractFactory and AbstractProduct classes.


Abstract Factory Pattern: Code [1]class MazeFactory {

public:

MazeFactory();

virtual Maze* MakeMaze() const

{ return new Maze;}

// Creates components of mazes. // Builds rooms, walls, and doors.

virtual Wall* MakeWall() const

{ return new Wall;}

virtual Wall* MakeRoom(int n) const

{ return new Room;}

}// more methods.

// This factory is a collection of // factory methods. Also, this class// acts both as Abstract and Concrete // Factory


Abstract Factory Pattern: Code [1]Maze* MazeGame:: CreateMaze (MazeFactory& factory)

Maze* aMaze = factory.MakeMaze();

// Builds a maze.

}

Room* myroom = factory.MakeRoom(1);

Door* aDoor = factory.MakeDoor(myRoom,herRoom)

Room* herroom = factory.MakeRoom(2);

aMaze AddRoom(myRoom)

aMaze AddRoom(herRoom)

// More code to add walls.

// One can also create a// BombedMazeFactory with // different types of Rooms // and Walls.


Factory Method: The Problem [1]

1. Frameworks use abstract classes to define and maintain relationships between objects

2. Consider a framework for applications that present multiple documents to the user. A drawing application is an example.

3. This framework defines two abstract classes: application and document. These ought to be sub classed by clients for application specific implementation.

4. The application class will create and manage documents when required, e.g. when a New command is selected from the menu.


Factory Method Pattern: The Problem [2]

5. Document sub class is application specific. Hence the Application class does not know what kind of document to create!

6. Problem: The framework must instantiate classes but it only knows about the abstract classes, which it cannot initiate!


Factory Method Pattern: Solution[1]

2. Application subclasses redefine an abstract CreateDoc() method to return the appropriate Document subclass.

1. The Factory Method pattern encapsulates the knowledge of which Document subclass to create and moves this knowledge out of the framework.

3. When an Application is instantiated, it can instantiate application specific Documents without knowing their class.


Factory Method: Solution[2]

Document

Open()

Close()

Save()

Application

CreateDoc()NewDoc()OpenDoc()

MyApplication

CreateDoc()MyDocument

Document* doc=CreateDoc();docs.Add(doc);docOpen();

docs

1*

Factory method


Factory Method Pattern: Structure

Product Creator

FactoryMethod()SomeOperation()

ConcreteCreator

FactoryMethod()ConcreteProduct

product=Factory method

Return new ConcreteProduct


Factory Method Pattern: Participants and Communication

• ConcreteProduct (MyDocument): Implements the Product interface.

• Creator (Application): Declares factory method which returns an object of type Product. Also, may define the factory method to create a Product object.

• ConcreteCreator (MyApplication): Overrides the factory method to

return an instance of a ConcreteProduct.

• Product (Document): Defines the interface of objects the factory method creates.


Other Patterns: Singleton

• One may use a global variable to access an object but it does not prevent one from creating more than one instance.

• Instead the class itself is made responsible for keeping track of its instance. It can thus ensure that no more than one instance is created. This is the singleton pattern.

• Used to ensure that a class has only one instance. For example, one printer spooler object, one file system, one window manager, etc.


Singleton Structure

Singleton

static Instance()

SingletonOp()

GetSingletonData()

static uniqueInstance

singletonDatareturn uniqueinstance


Singleton Code [1]

class Singleton {

public:

static Singleton* Instance();

}

protected:

Singleton();

private:

Static Singleton* _instance

// Only one instance can ever be created.

// Creation hidden inside Instance().

// Cannot access directly.


Singleton Code [2]

Singleton* Singleton::_instance=0;

Singleton* Singleton:: Instance(){

if (_instance ==0) {_instance=new Singleton;

}Return _instance;

} // Clients access the singleton // exclusively via the Instance member // function.

56

Herzlichen Dank!

Softwaretechnologie für Fortgeschrittene Teil Thaller Stunde V: Software Engineering II Köln 28....

Documents

Transcript of Softwaretechnologie für Fortgeschrittene Teil Thaller Stunde V: Software Engineering II Köln 28....