Social Web 3.0
-
Upload
fredfenneteau -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.036 -
download
0
Transcript of Social Web 3.0
Welcome to Social Web 3.0
- Saving Debbie’s Privacy -
Page 2© 2010 Hibe Inc
Hi everyone, my name is Jean Dobey, founder of Hibe.
Over the past few years, we investigated the foundation of our real life social network. Our research shows how Web 2.0 services fail to meet people’s expectations. These findings led us to create a new concept of social networking that correlates our online and offline social lives.
Recently, Paul Adams, senior UX researcher at Google, released his vision of the real life social network. He suggests his work as the foundation for a future of the web. We find that his vision lacks critical perspectives to describe our real life social network.
Here, I explore some of our findings through Debbie’s eyes. I also present what the Social Web 3.0 should be, and what it means for people like Debbie.
Jean Dobey
@jdobey
/jeandobey
/jeandobey
blog.hibe.com
Page 3© 2010 Hibe Inc
The Real Life
Social Network
Addendum
Before jumping into the online world, we need to better understand how we behave and share offline.
Page 4© 2010 Hibe Inc
Debbie’s Real Life
Social Network
Page 5© 2010 Hibe Inc
Hi, I’m Debbie from “The Real Life Social Network v2” Slideshare presentation published by Paul Adams, Senior UX Researcher, Google
Page 6© 2010 Hibe Inc
As Paul showed, I divide my social life into audiences.
They are my LA Friends where I used to live…
LA
friends
Page 7© 2010 Hibe Inc
my new San Diego Friends where I live now…
LA
friends
San Diego
friends
Page 8© 2010 Hibe Inc
my family…
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Page 9© 2010 Hibe Inc
…and my class of 10-year old swimmers.
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 10© 2010 Hibe Inc
They represent my social network, which I manage with relative ease by behaving and sharing differently with each audience.
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 11© 2010 Hibe Inc
For my LA friends, I am “LA Debbie” …
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 12© 2010 Hibe Inc
for my San Diego friends, I am “SD Debbie”…
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 13© 2010 Hibe Inc
for my Family members, I am “Family Debbie”…
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 14© 2010 Hibe Inc
…and for my 10-year old swimmers, I am “Teacher Debbie”
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 15© 2010 Hibe Inc
Aside from my social network, I also behave and sharedifferently with a variety of strangers.
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 16© 2010 Hibe Inc
For example, every Sunday afternoon at the ball park, I am “Sporty Debbie”…
Ball park
Page 17© 2010 Hibe Inc
every Sunday in church, I am “Praying Debbie” …
Ball park Church
Page 18© 2010 Hibe Inc
And, even last night, at my first rock concert, I was “Rocking Debbie”.
Ball park Church Rock concert
Page 19© 2010 Hibe Inc
These social contexts influence how I interact with such public audiences.
Ball park Church Rock concert
Page 20© 2010 Hibe Inc
I can also define more public audiences based on myinterests, beliefs, and life experiences.
Surfers Democrats Mothers
Page 21© 2010 Hibe Inc
Fact is, when I am in public, I often model my sharing and behavior from conditions I define or adopt.
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 22© 2010 Hibe Inc
Conversation in
The Real Life
Social Network
A conversation is always about something.
Page 23© 2010 Hibe Inc
When I converse with people, it’s always about something, someone, someplace.
LA
friend
San Diego
friend
Family
member
Swimming
kid
Page 24© 2010 Hibe Inc
Not everybody has the same level of interest in what I share. For some, my conversation may be important, for others it may be perceived as noise.
Page 25© 2010 Hibe Inc
However, they always have opt-out options to avoid noise. They can either avoid the conversations…
Page 26© 2010 Hibe Inc
or they can simply avoid me all together.
Page 27© 2010 Hibe Inc
For instance, if I talk too much about my pets and not enough about swimming during class, it will annoy some students. They can make remarks about it, or findanother teacher for the next session.
Annoyed
swimming
kid
OR
Page 28© 2010 Hibe Inc
The Real Life
Social Network Is
Dynamic and Complex
That’s where Debbie’s worlds collide.
Page 29© 2010 Hibe Inc
One day, my brother went to study at UCLA, and asked me to introduce him to my LA friends…
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 30© 2010 Hibe Inc
while one of my LA friends moved to San Diego where he hooked up with some of my San Diego friends.
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
LA
friends
Page 31© 2010 Hibe Inc
Another San Diego friend got married with one of my family members…
Family
members
Swimming
kids
San Diego
friends
LA
friends
Page 32© 2010 Hibe Inc
and my nephew joined my swimming class.
Swimming
kids
Family
members
LA
friends
San Diego
friends
Page 33© 2010 Hibe Inc
I thought I could simply adapt my sharing behaviornaturally.
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 34© 2010 Hibe Inc
But life is full of surprises. My audiences keep mixing up overtime…
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 35© 2010 Hibe Inc
and I am losing control over my network along with my image and privacy.
LA
friends
San Diego
friendsFamily
members
Swimming
kids
Page 36© 2010 Hibe Inc
Transparency,
Integrity & Privacy
Debbie needs to make a tough choice; be transparentor be private without losing her integrity.
Page 37© 2010 Hibe Inc
Should I simply try to cope with this?
Page 38© 2010 Hibe Inc
I can try to cope with the complexity of my overlappedaudiences by adjusting my image and behavior when necessary.
LA
friends
San Diego
friends
Family
members
Swimming
kids
Page 39© 2010 Hibe Inc
LA friends
For example, when I talk to my LA friends, I would alter my image and behavior when my brother joins us. I would hide some conversations from him.
LA friends
?
Page 40© 2010 Hibe Inc
LA friends LA friends
If more people from other audiences join in, I will keep altering my image and behavior. If this occurs often, my LA friends will not recognize “LA Debbie”anymore.
?
???
?
?
? ?
?
Page 41© 2010 Hibe Inc
Problem is, if I keep changing, I will no longer be the “Debbie” people know. I will become superficial and will lack integrity.
LA
friends
San Diego
friends
Swimming
students
Family
members
??
?
?
?
?
? ?
? ?
?
???
?
?
?
?
?
??
??
?
Page 42© 2010 Hibe Inc
Or should I simply stop worrying
about my privacy?
Page 43© 2010 Hibe Inc
I can stop worrying about my image and privacy and be transparent to everybody. This way, I won’t lack integrity.
LA
friends
San Diego
friends
Family
members
Swimming
kids
Page 44© 2010 Hibe Inc
But if I am too transparent, I doubt others will trust mewith their information?
LA
friends
San Diego
friends
Family
members
Swimming
kids
Page 45© 2010 Hibe Inc
Should I simply redefine my audiences?
Page 46© 2010 Hibe Inc
I realize that my network has changed.
LA
friends
San Diego
friends
Family
members
Swimming
kids
Page 47© 2010 Hibe Inc
I can redefine my audiences and portray specific images to them.
Page 48© 2010 Hibe Inc
For example, I feel uncomfortable having my LA friends overlapping with my brother.
LA friends
with my brother
Page 49© 2010 Hibe Inc
To solve the situation, I divide my “LA friends with my brother” into close LA friends, and other LA friends.
LA friends
with my brother Other LA friendsClose LA friends
Page 50© 2010 Hibe Inc
Because my close LA friends already know me as either “Family Debbie” or “LA Debbie”, I will merge them to form “Close LA Debbie”.
Page 51© 2010 Hibe Inc
This way, my close LA friends would know me a bit better. They would discover another facet of me and I would not lack integrity.
LA friends
with my brother Other LA friendsClose LA friends
Page 52© 2010 Hibe Inc
In the end, more audiences mean more control over my image and my privacy.
Page 53© 2010 Hibe Inc
Gossiping Debbie, Debbie Who?, or Private Debbie… I am hesitating. Which “Debbie” should I be? If you were me, which one would you be?
Page 54© 2010 Hibe Inc
Identity in The
Real Life Social
Network
People naturally portray specific facets (images)
of their identity to fit specific audiences.
Page 55© 2010 Hibe Inc
As a person, I possess one identity. It includes my values, beliefs, interests, affiliations, and everything that makes me unique.
Page 56© 2010 Hibe Inc
I can choose to share a subset of my identity with everybody through one facet.
Page 57© 2010 Hibe Inc
If I add another facet, I will be able to share specific things with different audiences
Page 58© 2010 Hibe Inc
The more facets I have, the better I manage how people perceive me.
Page 59© 2010 Hibe Inc
I can be private with people I have less intimacy with, while sharing more with people close to me.
San Diego
friends
Family
members
Page 60© 2010 Hibe Inc
Web 2.0 and the
Real Life Social
Network
Our social life gets more complex every day. Many saw Web 2.0 a possible solution to our problems.
Page 61© 2010 Hibe Inc
My real life social network grows and overlaps overtime,
thanks to this highly connected world we live in.
Page 62© 2010 Hibe Inc
Family members
The more I segregate my connections, the more complex my audiences become.
LA
friends
San Diego
friends
Co-workers
Swimming
kids
Dentist
Competition
winners
Surfers
Wine lovers
Movie lovers
Boyfriend
Volunteers
Business
contacts
Page 63© 2010 Hibe Inc
150
With such a social dynamic, how many facets can I use? Maybe 150. Certainly not an infinite number, at least offline.
Page 64© 2010 Hibe Inc
To help me maintain such a social dynamic, I useonline tools that can handle parts of my network
Page 65© 2010 Hibe Inc
Web 2.0
is not enough
There may be great services out there. Can they really help Debbie?
Page 66© 2010 Hibe Inc
Why do I have to use two systems to share with my personal and professional audiences when they overlap? I have co-workers who are also my friends.
Page 67© 2010 Hibe Inc
Why can’t I share tweets, photos and videos in my various audiences? I wish Twitter, Youtube and Flickrwould allow me to do faceting.
Page 68© 2010 Hibe Inc
Why should I use a specialized dating service when I can easily meet someone through friends on Facebook or colleagues on LinkedIn? I wish I could use my existing identity on eHarmony.
Page 69© 2010 Hibe Inc
Why do I need multiple sites to share with the same audiences from my social lives? I wish Web 2.0 services considered the overlaps of my audiences.
Page 70© 2010 Hibe Inc
Web 2.0 services helped me to some extent, but they also created many issues and discrepancies between my online and offline social lives.
Superficial or deep relationships?
Total transparency or privacy?
Where are my audiences?
…
Page 71© 2010 Hibe Inc
Web 2.0 services need to be rethought!
Page 72© 2010 Hibe Inc
Welcome to
Social Web 3.0
The next generation of online social networks shouldbetter emulate the way we share and behave offline…
Page 73© 2010 Hibe Inc
I should be allowed to
have multiple facets of
my identity
Page 74© 2010 Hibe Inc
My conversations
should always be about
something, someone,
someplace
Page 75© 2010 Hibe Inc
I should always be able
to opt out from any
conversations
OR
Page 76© 2010 Hibe Inc
San Diego
friends
Family
members
I should always be in
control of my audiences
Page 77© 2010 Hibe Inc
I should be able to
connect to others based
on pre-defined
conditions
Page 78© 2010 Hibe Inc
Then I would save my privacy
and sync my offline and online
social lives
Page 79© 2010 Hibe Inc
Thanks