Social Relationship and Decision-Making explained by Fuzzy Logic
-
Upload
mohammad-shaker -
Category
Technology
-
view
513 -
download
0
Transcript of Social Relationship and Decision-Making explained by Fuzzy Logic
Mohammad Shaker Seminar of Fuzzy Logic. IT Engineering of Damascus, Syria
ZGTR, April, 15 2013
Social Relationship
and Decision Making
Explained by Fuzzy
Logic
Mohammad Shaker Student at Information Technology Engineering, Damascus - Syria,
Dept. of Artificial Intelligence
@ZGTRShaker
Dr. Maisa Abu-Alkassem Supervisor and Dr. at Information Technology Engineering, Damascus - Syria,
Dept. of Artificial Intelligence
Conditional Proposition P1 โง P2 โง ... โง Pn โ Q
Valid Statement P1 โง P2 โง ... โง Pn โ Q
Statement P1, P2,..., Pn โ Q
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
Aristotelic logic
P1 โง P2 โง ... โง Pn โ Q
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
Aristotelic logic
P1 โง P2 โง ... โง Pn โ Q
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
Vectorial human mind description
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
Human mental description
singleton values, inference and decision-making
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
Not a coincidence that point-of-view,
mathematical conditional proposition, and
premises when using the logic operator โง
are immediate and close related
โ
โ
๐
฿ค ๐ (๐ฆ)
Individual is associated to the point
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
P1 โง P2 โง ... โง Pn โ Q
๐
๐
฿ค ๐ (๐ฆ)
Individual is associated to the point
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
P1 โง P2 โง ... โง Pn โ Q
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐12๐ฅ1
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐12๐ฅ1 ๐23๐ฅ1
๐23๐ฅ2 ๐13๐ฅ2
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
There is a closer thinking between 1 and 2, than between 1 and 3.
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐12๐ฅ1 ๐23๐ฅ1
๐23๐ฅ2 ๐13๐ฅ2
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
Do not seem to be an ideal representative of real world relationship. Even presenting a
barely small distance, individuals represented by P1(ยท) and
P2(ยท) does not share the same space in the n-dimensional
plane, either in the i-th universe of discourse.
โ
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐12๐ฅ1 ๐23๐ฅ1
๐23๐ฅ2 ๐13๐ฅ2
โ
๐
๐
฿ค ๐ (๐ฆ)
Mapping, Fuzziness
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
Mapping, Fuzziness
2 universes of discourse
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
๐
๐
฿ค ๐ (๐ฆ)
Mapping, Fuzziness
Most of time the human
reasoning is approximate
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
๐
๐
฿ค ๐ (๐ฆ)
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
Individuals Ideas Representation
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
(๐ฅ0, ๐ฆ0)
Individuals Ideas Representation
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
Source of uncertainty
and imprecision
Individuals Ideas Representation
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐2
๐1
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
Source of uncertainty
and imprecision
The vector that represents the idea can be related to the situation where the individual is in doubt or even
is flexible in making decisions, judging or analyzing a situation.
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Social (Aristotelic) Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
Fuzzy Social Relationship
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Fuzzy Social Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Fuzzy Social Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Fuzzy Social Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Fuzzy Social Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐๐: individual ๐
Fuzzy Social Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐๐๐๐๐๐ = ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐(๐๐โง ๐โ ๐)
The social relationship of two individuals, ๐๐ and ๐โ ๐, each
represented by a n-th relation, ๐ ๐, projected in a j-th universe
of discourse is:
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐๐๐๐๐๐ = ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐(๐๐โง ๐โ ๐)
Fuzzy Social Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐๐๐๐๐๐ = ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐(๐๐โง ๐โ ๐)
Fuzzy Social Relationship
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
Mem
bers
hip
funct
ion, G
, C, a
nd G
and C
Traditional Decision-making in Fuzzy environment
0
1
120 Input universe of discourse x1
Input universe of discourse x1
Mem
bers
hip
funct
ion, G
, C, a
nd G
and C
Traditional Decision-making in Fuzzy environment
0
1
120
Constraint, ๐12
Constraint, ๐12
Input universe of discourse x1
Mem
bers
hip
funct
ion, G
, C, a
nd G
and C
Traditional Decision-making in Fuzzy environment
0
1
120
Constraint, ๐12
Goal, ๐11
Goal, ๐11 Constraint, ๐1
2
Input universe of discourse x1
Mem
bers
hip
funct
ion, G
, C, a
nd G
and C
Traditional Decision-making in Fuzzy environment
0
1
120
Constraint, ๐12
Goal, ๐11
Goal, ๐11 Constraint, ๐1
2
Input universe of discourse x1
Mem
bers
hip
funct
ion, G
, C, a
nd G
and C
Traditional Decision-making in Fuzzy environment
0
1
120
Constraint, ๐12
Goal, ๐11
Decision by Defuzzification
Goal, ๐11 Constraint, ๐1
2
Decision by
Defuzzification
Input universe of discourse x1
Mem
bers
hip
funct
ion, G
, C, a
nd G
and C
Traditional Decision-making in Fuzzy environment
0
1
120
Constraint, ๐12
Goal, ๐11
Decision by Defuzzification
Goal, ๐11 Constraint, ๐1
2
Decision by
Defuzzification
D = G โฉ C
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐๐๐ = ๐บ๐
๐ = ๐ถ๐โ ๐
the goal for one individual is, actually, the constraint for the other one
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐๐๐๐๐๐ = ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐(๐๐โง ๐โ ๐)
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐๐๐๐๐๐ = ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐(๐๐โง ๐โ ๐)
๐11 = ๐บ1
1 = ๐ถ12 = ๐ถ1
3
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐ท๐1,๐2,๐ฅ1 = ๐บ1
1 โฉ ๐ถ12= ๐1
1 โง ๐12 ,
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
๐ท๐1,๐2,๐ฅ1 = ๐บ1
1 โฉ ๐ถ12= ๐1
1 โง ๐12 ,
๐ท๐1,๐2,๐ฅ1 = ๐บ1
2 โฉ ๐ถ11= ๐1
2 โง ๐11
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
if there is a non-coincidental
goal for people that want interact
to, their feasible area of decision
is related to what they have in
common
โ
โ
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐21
๐12
๐22
๐13
๐23
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐12 ๐1
3
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐21
๐22
๐23
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐12 ๐1
3
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐21
๐22
๐23
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐12 ๐1
3
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐21
๐22
๐23
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐12 ๐1
3
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐21
๐22
๐23
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐12 ๐1
3
Decision Making in fuzzy environment
๐21
๐22
๐23
๐21 ๐2
2 = G โฉ C
๐22 ๐2
1 = G โฉ C
it can be noticed both
mathematically and visually that
when there is overlapping in the
fuzzy sets in the n-dimensional
mathematical relation, a true
relationship exists.
โ
โ
when there is flexibility and a
sort of representative behavior
that worth sharing space in
debate, the chances of achieving
a common decision-making is
greater.
โ
โ
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐12 ๐1
3
Affinity and Friendship
๐21
๐22
๐23
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐12 ๐1
3
Affinity and Friendship
๐21
๐22
๐23
๐ฅ1
๐ฅ2
๐11
฿ค ๐1๐ฅ๐2 (๐ฅ1, ๐ฅ2)
๐12 ๐1
3
Affinity and Friendship
๐21
๐22
๐23
Can I
do it?!
Should I
do it?
What will
others think?
Sheโs not
gonna like
it
Thisโs
definitely
wrong!
This will turn
out good Iโm good at it, I
should do it
Am I
prepared?
Can I
do it?!
Should I
do it?
What will
others think?
Sheโs not
gonna like
it
Thisโs
definitely
wrong!
This will turn
out good Iโm good at it, I
should do it
Am I
prepared?