Social Monitoring Report - adb.org · NOTES This social monitoring report is a document of the...

Social Monitoring Report

Quarterly Report (June 2018 – August 2018) September 2018

INO: Regional Roads Development Project

Prepared by Directorate General of Highways, Ministry of Public Works and Housings for the

Asian Development Bank.

NOTES This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

DRAFT Quarterly LARP Monitoring Report June – August 2018 Project Number: Loan 2817-INO

INO: Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Prepared by Directorate General of Highways for the Asian Development Bank

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP), ADB Loan 2817-INO Quarterly LARP Monitoring Report, June – August 2018

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background ............................................................................................................ 1

1.2 Timelines ................................................................................................................. 3

1.3 Number of AHs and Budget during Plan and Implementation .......................... 4

2. GENERAL PROGRESS IN LARP IMPLEMENTATION ........................................... 6

2.1 Compensation Payment ........................................................................................ 6

2.1.1. West Kalimantan .................................................................................................... 6

2.1.3. East Java ................................................................................................................. 8

2.1.4. Central Java ............................................................................................................ 8

2.2 Income Restoration Program (IRP) .................................................................... 10

3. OUTSTANDING ISSUES ON RESETTLEMENT, STATUS, AND

CORRESPONDING PLAN OF ACTION ............................................................... 18

3.1 West Kalimantan .................................................................................................. 18

3.2 North Kalimantan ................................................................................................. 19

3.3 East Java ............................................................................................................... 20

3.4 Central Java .......................................................................................................... 20

4. OTHER CONCERNS AND NOTATIONS .............................................................. 22

4.1 Internal and External Monitoring ........................................................................ 22

LISTOF TABLES

Table 1. Summary of Subprojects - Description by Region and Corresponding Social Safeguard Document .......................................................................... 1

Table 2. Key Timelines Associated with Social Safeguards Imperatives ............................ 3

Table 3. Numbers of Affected Households and Cost for Replacement Asset and Assistance in the Planning Document and Implementation Reports ................ 4

Table 4. AHs in Sanggau RRDP-LRP ............................................................................. 10

Table 5. Vulnerable AHs in CW-06 and CW-07 Entitled to RRDP-LRP ........................... 11

Table 6. Sambas and Singkawang LRP Cost Details ...................................................... 13

Table 7. AHs in Missing Link RRDP-LRP........................................................................ 15

Table 8. Remaining Outstanding Issues from West Kalimantan as of August 2018 ......... 19

Table 9. Remaining Outstanding Issues from North Kalimantan as of August 2018 ......... 19

Table 10. Remaining Outstanding Issues from Central Java as of August 2018 .............. 20


ii

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Instruction Letter from Bupati Bulungan to Institutions within the District to Allocate Budget for that Programs as Requested by the DGH

Appendix 2 Receipts of “Kerohiman” Provided by the Contractors to Aggrieved AHs whose Plants Have not Been Paid

ABBREVIATIONS

AH : Rumah Tangga Terkena Dampak (Affected Household)

AP : Warga Terkena Dampak (Affected Person)

ATR/BPN : Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional

DMS : Survei Detil Aset Terkena Dampak (Detailed Measurement Survey)

DGH : Directorate General of Highways

IOL : Identifikasi Aset Terkena Dampak (Inventory of Losses)

IPPKH : Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan (Forest Land Use Permit)

LG : Local Government

MOEF : Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup and Kehutanan (Ministry of Environment and Forestry)

MPWH : Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (Ministry of Public Works and Housing)

SPPT : Surat Pembayaran Pajak Terutang (Letter of Payable Tax Payment)

SES : Survei Sosial Ekonomi (Socio Economic Survey)

UKM : Usaha Kecil dan Menengah (Small Medium Enterprise)


1

1. INTRODUCTION

1. The Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP) is being implemented in four provinces of Indonesia, namely West and North Kalimantan; Central and East Java, envisaged to address important national or strategic road corridors in northern Kalimantan and southern Java to encourage economic growth in the less developed and poorer areas of Indonesia. The rehabilitation, capacity expansion and new construction of roads will improve connectivity and access to services. Specifically, improved road infrastructure in southern Java is necessary for increased economic growth to improve access to markets and to attract investment in that area. Road network development in Kalimantan will ensure that economic development will occur in less developed and remote areas.

2. The Project is a four-year undertaking by the Director General of Highways (DGH or Ditjen Bina Marga) of the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (MPWPH) purposely to rehabilitate, improve or newly construct about 476 km of roads and bridges where of the 485 km sub project roads, about 679 m of bridges will involve rehabilitation or replacement and 40 km will be construction of new roads in agricultural areas with existing earthen tracks in some sections.

3. Project financing is with the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) as approved on 24 November 2011 by the ADB Board. The Government of Indonesia and ADB signed the loan agreement on 07 May 2012. The ADB- financed component covers 408 km of road (459 m of which are bridges) while the IDB- financed component includes 77 km of road (220 m of which are bridges).

1.1 Background

4. RRDP comprises of eleven (11) construction packages. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plans (LARP) were prepared in October 2011 and uploaded on to the ADB website (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of Subprojects - Description by Region and Corresponding Social Safeguard Document

No Package No Project Name * Length (km)*

District Type of Works Safeguard Document

CENTRAL JAVA

1 CW-01

24-RCP-01

Tambakmulya - Wawar

38.46 Kebumen Widening, new road resurfacing and new bridge construction

LARP (October 2011)

2 CW-02

24-RCP-02

Giriwoyo - Duwet 23.75 Wonogiri New road, reconstruction, widening and reconstruction bridge

N/A **

3 CW-03

24-RCP-03

Wawar - Congot 14.13 Purworejo Widening and resurfacing

EAST JAVA

4 CW-04

28-RCP-01A

Jolosutro - Sendang biru

21.30 Malang New road construction including raising grade and new bridge constructon

LARP (October 2011)

WEST KALIMANTAN

5 CW-05

30-RCP-01

Sosok - Tayan

Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau

79.20 Sanggau Reconstruction and resurfacing (direct overlay)

LARP

(October 2011)


2

No Package No Project Name * Length (km)*

District Type of Works Safeguard Document

6 CW-06

30-RCP-02

Singkawang - Tebas 29.80 Singkawang& Sambas

Reconstruction, widening and resurfacing

LARP

(October 2011) Sambas Bypass 6.10

Sambas

Tanjung Harapan - Galing

20.00

Sambas - Tanjung Harapan (missing link)

12.30 Reconstruction and resurfacing

RP

(February 2017)

7 CW-07

30-RCP-03

Sp. Tanjung-Galing (Section-1 and 2)

40.91

Sambas Reconstruction and resurfacing

LARP

(October 2011) Aruk (Bts. Serawak)-Sp. Tanjung

5.62

NORTH KALIMANTAN

8 CW-08

34-RCP-01

Tanjung Selor - Sp.3 Tanjung Palas

34.82 Bulungan Reconstruction, decreasing grade and resurfacing

LARP

(October 2011)

Sp Tanjung - Sekatak Buji (Section-1)

9 CW-09

34-RCP-02

Sp. 3 Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section-2)

65.03 Bulungan Reconstruction, decreasing grade and resurfacing

10 CW-10

34-RCP-03

Sp. 3 Apas - Simaranggis (Section-1)

45.59 Nunukan Reconstruction including decreasing grade and reconstruction

11 CW-11

34-RCP-04

Sp.3 Apas - Simaranggis (Section-2)

27.15 Nunukan Widening, decreasing grade and reconstruction

Simaranggis - Bts Negara (Sendong)

20.60

Note:

*) For some road sections, the name and length in the LARP document are different (because it was prepared based on the initial design. In the QLARP the name and length are refer to the Contract document.

**) All of payment have been completed for CW 02 and CW 03 far before the loan was signed, no safeguard document was prepared. Due diligence report is prepared by CTC in February 2017 to see the compliance with ADB Safeguard.

5. As stipulated in the Loan Agreement:

Schedule 5, Para 5: The Borrower shall, and shall cause the Project Executing Agency to ensure that any involuntary resettlement and / or activities impacting ethnic minorities be carried out in accordance with the agreed LARAPs, ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), and the Borrower’s relevant laws. In case of differences between Borrower’s laws and regulations and the SPS, the SPS shall prevail. In case of such involuntary resettlement, the Borrower shall ensure (a) the Project Executing Agency shall be responsible for internal monitoring of resettlement activities, including engagement of an external monitoring agency 1 month before commencement of the resettlement activities. The internal and external monitoring reports shall be submitted to ADB every quarter and uploaded on DGH's website within 2 weeks of their submission; and such monitoring and reporting activities shall be carried out until resettlement has been completed; and (b) the timely provision of counterpart funds for resettlement in order to satisfy the requirements and objectives of resettlement.

Schedule 5, Para 8: The Borrower shall, and shall cause the Project Executing Agency to ensure that ADB’s SPS requirements are applied and implemented for all Project components regardless of financing source.


3

6. As such, internal monitoring reports are prepared to determine the extent the LARP documents have been implemented in the field and identify constraints and problems encountered during the implementation process. Specifically, this report intends to cover the following concerns:

Compensation and/or other entitlements are provided as per Final LARP, with no discrimination according to gender, vulnerability, or any other factor;

Livelihood restoration measures are designed and implemented including modifications in the programs and provision of additional cash and in-kind assistance to the participating affected households as and when necessary;

Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are followed as described in the Final LARP;

Capacity of AP to re-store/re-establish livelihoods and living standards. Special attention is given to severely affected and vulnerable households.

Affected public facilities and infrastructure are restored promptly; and

The transition between relocation or site clearing and commencement of civil works is smooth and that sites are not handed over for civil works until affected households have been satisfactorily compensated, assisted and relocated.

1.2 Timelines

7. Key time lines (Table 2) are pertinent to note under social safeguards as Project management transitions to more relevant and comprehensive documentation of forthcoming monitoring periods.

Table 2. Key Timelines Associated with Social Safeguards Imperatives

Year Activity/Milestone

2010 Detailed design of all eleven (11) sub projects completed by DGH in December 2010.

Feasibility

2011 5 LARPs prepared

Loan approval by ADB Board on 24 November 2011

2012 The Government of Indonesia and ADB signed the loan agreement on 07 May 2012.

DGH updated the detailed design completed by Directorate of Technical Affairs (or

Bintek, DGH) in May 2012.

2013 External monitoring conducted for all LARPs

2014 The Core Team Consultant (Renardet) was mobilized on March 2014

2 Monitoring reports produced

2015 2 Monitoring reports produced; the 2nd

being from Dec 2015 – Feb 2016

Request for Contract addendum in West Kalimantan requiring new LARPs.

2016 5 Monitoring reports:

Sep - Nov 2015 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report

Dec 2015 - Feb 2016 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report

March - May 2016 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report

June - Aug 2016 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report

Sep - Nov 2016 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report

2017 Final LARP for Sambas - Tanjung Harapan (Missing Link) was sent to ADB in Feb 2017; and also approved in Feb 2017

Due Diligence on Central Java Packages (Feb 2017)

Short Resettlement Customary Community Plan was sent to ADB in July 2017, and approved in August 2017

Dec 2016 - Feb 2017 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report (July 2017)


4

Year Activity/Milestone

March - May 2017 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report (July 2017) and the Revision 1 (Oct 2017)

June - August 2017 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report (October 2017)

Short RCCDP Implementation Report (December 2017)

2018 September - November 2017 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report (January 2018)

Dec 2017 - Feb 2018 Quarterly Internal Monitong Report (March 2018)

March-May 2018 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report (July 2018)

LARP Implementation Report (September 2018)

1.3 Number of AHs and Budget during Plan and Implementation

8. Table 3 provides a summary of affected households eligible for compensation/ assistance and total replacement cost and assistance identified during plan and implementation, and source of funds for LARP implementation and the associated cost. In both Kalimantan and Java provinces, timely release of funds was a constraint despite assurances from local governments. Number of AHs and cost during implementation was usually much higher than the plan, and it was because of time span between both planning and implementation is usually long, thus there may be additional affected assets and increased unit price.

Table 3. Numbers of Affected Households and Cost for Replacement Asset and Assistance in the Planning Document and Implementation Reports1

Section

No. of AHs Eligible for Compensation/ Allowance/

Assistance

Total Replacement Cost and Allowance/Assistance

Source of

Funding

RP

or RCCDP

Implementation Report

3) or

DDR RP or RCCDP


3) or DDR

CENTRAL JAVA

CW-01

Tambakmulyo- Wawar

1,214 1,272 32,664,539,141,0

25,590,054,445.7

APBD Central Java Province and Kebumen District (2006 up to 2012 fiscal year)

Tambakmulyo-Wawar (Sta 0+00)

26 Not avail 5,813,813,570.6 APBD 2016 Fiscal Year of Kebumen District

CW-02

Griwoyo-Duwet

N/A 2 N/A Not avail APBD of Wonogiri District

CW-03

Wawar–Congot

N/A 2,663 N/A 12,248,349,710 APBD of Purworejo District (2005 up to 2007 fiscal year)

EAST JAVA

CW-04

Jolosutro- Sendangbiru

54 54 1,549,500,000.01)

15,081,024,077.44)

APBD Malang District start from 2011 fiscal year

4)

WEST KALIMANTAN

CW-05:

Sosok – Tayan.

Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau

369 478

2,741,013,375.0 4,454,199,985.7

APBD West Kalimantan Province, 2012-14 fiscal year

1 The number was updated according to verification data by CTC


5

Section

No. of AHs Eligible for Compensation/ Allowance/

Assistance

Total Replacement Cost and Allowance/Assistance

Source of

Funding

RP

or RCCDP


3) or

DDR RP or RCCDP


3) or DDR

CW-06

Tebas - Singkawang

Sambas Bypass

Galing –Tj. Harapan 275

276

3,497,610,375.0 1,652,847,847.9

APBD of Sambas District 20117 fiscal year

CW-07

Sp Tanjung-Galing

CW-06

Sambas – Tanjung Harapan (Missing Link)

88 89

2,636,373,329.0

1,041,858,137.8

APBD of Sambas District 20117 fiscal year

Aruk (Bts. Serawak)-Sp. Tanjung

5 3 67,446,284.0

43,832,937.22)

CSR under the Contractor budget

NORTH KALIMANTAN

CW-08:

Tanjung Selor–Sp 3 Tanjung Palas

Sp. Tanjung – Sekatak Buji (Sec-1)

3

328

439,648,437.0

612,406,081.0

APBD of Bulungan District 2014-2015 fiscal year

CW-09:

Sp 3 Tanjung Palas

- Sekatak Buji (Sec-2)

88

CW-10:

Sp Tiga Apas – Simanggaris (Sec-1)

2 31

1,484,847,000.0

Contractor CSR budget 2016

CW-11:

Sp Tiga Apas – Simanggaris (Sec-2)

Simanggaris – Batas Negara (Serudong)

0 31

GRAND TOTAL 2,098 2,588

Note: 1)

includes estimation budget for replacement of forest land; 2) plus non-cash compensation in the form

of rebuild assets by the Contractor,3)

includes QLARP information,4)

Malang District stopped process of land acquisition for replacement of forest land because according to the new government regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah No. 105/2015) replacing acquired forestry land will be provided in the form of riverbank rehabilitation within the forest for commercial and non-commercial purposes only. The rehabilitation has been completed in 2015


6

2. GENERAL PROGRESS IN LARP IMPLEMENTATION

2.1 Compensation Payment

2.1.1. West Kalimantan

9. Following are monitoring results for each package in West Kalimantan

10. Sosok-Tayan; Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau. It was reported in the previous monitoring report that payment of compensation to the affected households (AHs) has been implemented by the Government of Sanggau on 2013 and 2014. Top up for depreciation was likewise delivered, thereby complying with the project safeguards policy. Compensation paid by the LG is based on the preliminary design using a corridor of impact (COI) of 14 meters.

11. However, from the monitoring by CTC in August 2017 and during ADB Mission conducted in November 2017, the team found/identified some outstanding issues related to unsettled compensation payment. Following are summary of the issues and action have been taken

i. Claimed compensation of the land and additional affected trees from HHs in Sebarra Village.

Agreement on compensations with the all aggrieved AHs was achived at the end of February 2018 and payment was delivered in early March 2018. As per agreement, aside from cash compensation, all 10 Land Certificates will be updated by BPN Sanggau District without charge to AHs. Updating process still pending because of some certificates are still a collateral in the bank.

ii. Additional ROW which needed for development of intersection Batu Ampar (Sta 41+12 to 41+475).

ROW acquired by LG was 15 m, while for development of the intersections need 16 to 23.75 m of ROW. Shortage of land for the intersection belonged to one household (namely: Agus/Arti). Payment of compensation given in the form of cash and build a “retaining wall” on the remaining land to avoid land slide, all have been completed deilvered in May 2018.

iii. Outlet for cross drain at Sta 25 + 525- Batang Tarang Village, Balai Sub district

As reported in the previous report outlet for the cross drain at this station will discharge through the existing drainage located 375 m south of the outlet, no more additional private land is needed.

iv. Intersection Sosok (Sta 0+00)- Sosok Village, Tayan Hulu Sub district

Drainage along the intersection could not be constructed yet since there is an affected fence that belongs to the church (+ 300 m). The contractor shall ensure avoidance of damage to the fence. Any damage due to construction will be addressed by the contractor. As of August 2018, the drainage alongside the intersection was not constructed yet.

12. Tebas-Singkawang - Sambas Bypass: Galing-Tanjung Harapan; Aruk (Bts. Serawak)-Sp. Tanjung. Compensation payment was provided by the Sambas District Government in 2011 for the loss of structures and trees/crops. According to verification carried out by CTC in 2015, the project corridor impact (COI) has been within the existing ROW and there is no private land affected by the project. Therefore, compensation payment for CW-06 is acceptable.

13. Tanjung Harapan - Sambas (Missing Link). As reported in the previous monitoring report, payment of compensation for structures, including the outstanding gap compensation have been delivered completely in December 2017. First compensation was delivered in December 2016, second compensation was given in June 2017 and the third compensation was delivered in early December 2017. All supporting payment


7

documents have been received and verified by CTC, therefore ccompensation payment for CW-06 (Missing Link) road section is compliant to the entitlements in the approved RP

2017. Some AHs who were interviewed by CTC also expressed their satisfaction to the amount of compensation payment and road development as well. They got sufficient information about the land acquisition process and project itself.

14. Compensation payment for trees. Based on the RP and as confirmed at implementation, it was determined that 71 trees of the local government of Sambas would be affected by the project. The head of Sambas Public Housing, Settlement Area and Environmental Agency staff made arrangements to replace the affected trees through tree planting activities specifically along the road shoulder. Budget to this effect had been re-allocated to address the commitment to plant 1,000 trees at replacement for compensation of affected 71 trees. On 20 July 2018, A total of 252 seedlings were planted: 202 seedlings (200 pucuk merah and 2 tabebuya) planted along the road shoulder in Rambi-Kartiasa road section and 50 pucuk merah are planted in government land (Health Agency, Religious Court, District Court, Family Planning Office, Diskumindag, Population and Civil Registration Agency/ Disdukcapil) on 20 July 2018. The remining plants will be planted on September – October 2018. However, 252 seedlings were planted already meet entitlement of replacement of affected 71 trees

15. Assistance for Income Loss due to Project Impact on Independent Shops. Nine AHs are owners of business structures to be partially affected and will experience temporary loss of income for about 3-7 days. According to the internal monitoring during construction, the impacts to their business are not significant and they can still continue with their business transactions during construction. They will be included as beneficiaries of livelihood restoration programs. After verification only seven AHs entitled to be included due to double counting.

16. Simpang Tanjung - Aruk. Due to several assets belonging to a minimal number of AHs belonging to customary communities along the ROW, DGH prepared the short Resettlement and Customary Community Development Plan (RCCDP) and the document was approved by ADB in August 2017. Compensation payment for the affected assets and implementation of IRP has been completely paid in September 2017 as per approved short RCCDP.

2.1.2. North Kalimantan

17. Bulungan. As reported in the previous monitoring report, there are remaining outstanding issues related with compensation of structures and trees. The Bulungan District Government depreciated the value of the affected structures, which is not in compliance with the project safeguards principles and entitlements. A series of discussion was carried out between DGH and Bulungan local government to address this gap. According to the last discussion on 3 April 2018, Bulungan local government manifested willingness to give top up depreciation in the form of training programs that provide tangible benefits to AHs. In order to follow up the letter of Director of Road Network Development, Bupati Bulungan issued instruction letter to some relevant institutions within the districts, dated 21 May 2018 to allocate budget for economic empowerment programs and include the entitled AHs to participate in that programs. No information about when (in which fiscal year) the programs should be allocated. The relevant institutions assigned by the Bupati are the District Agriculture Agency, the District Fishery Agency and the District Industry, Trade, Cooperatives, Small and Medium Enterprises Agency. The Director of Road Network Development and Instruction Letter from Bupati Bulungan are shown in the Appendix 1.

18. In addition, during the ADB mission in December 2017 complaints were identified from approximately 143 households with affected plants in Sta 14+00, 19+00 and Sta 21+00 to Sta 35+00 in 2015. They claim to not having received compensation to date. The aggrieved AHs forbade the contractor access and this hindered the completion of 1 km


8

asphalting works at Sta 26+000 to Sta 27+000. Considering limitation of time construction period and in order to completed remaining 1 km of asphat works, compensation was delivered to 65 aggrieved AHs in February 2018 using Contractor budget (see the receipts in the Appendix 2). Compensation payment was delivered using “uang kerohiman” which is lower than the market rate and, therefore, it is not acceptable to ADB. Further discussion with DGH on the detailed actions for compensation in compliance with the entitlements set forth in the Resettlement Plan is needed.

19. In April 2018 CTC was able to interview three AHs. Their perceptions about the project are enumerated as follows:

Ibu Kallen and husband from Pimping Village (belonging to the Dayak Kenya Ma’lung group expressed their satisfaction on the road development which make more access for agriculture product marketing/distribution. Her husband who works as a middleman further said that betterment of road reduced travel time from the village to the nearest harbor (Ancam Village) from 2.5 hours to 1.5 hours only. Reduction of travel time also reduced operational cost for fuel. Negative impact from the road betterment is increasing number of accidents, not only motorbike accidents but also some of heavy truck which bring palm oil was fallen/crashed. Due to better road condition, the speed has increased and the drivers become careless. Lack of road sign and lighting also caused of the accident.

Ibu Enri Astuti/Bapak Sudar of Panca Agung Village expressed her satisfaction on the road development. She just opened her restaurant after the road improved. They complained about lack of road lamp and signs (especially in some the intersection within the village). Another complaint was about flooding near her house, which she thought was due to limited capacity of new box culvert. According to a PPK staff this was because of land clearing in the upstream for opening up new coconut palm oil plantation, not because of the box culvert.

Bapak Aji Sumanto of Karang Agung Village stated that despite being paid compensation in full, he was not satisfied with the road project. Sufficient attention was not made to road safety. In particular, he cites the slope at the bend of Karang Agung intersection, which is too sharp and caused many accidents. Further, that the quality of road construction was quite poor: presence of cracks and potholes on the newly constructed pavement.

20. Nunukan. For Nunukan District, the compensation payment to affected trees was provided in the form of access road to the plantation and houses built by the Contractor. A report demonstrating that the assistance provided by the Contractor for the access is equivalent with the compensation rate has been described in previous monitoring reports. As per interview by safeguard team with several AHs, they also expressed their satisfaction and have no more complaints.

2.1.3. East Java

21. As reported in previous monitoring reports, the remaining issue for road section in East Java was issuance of Forest Land Use Permit- Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan (IPPKH). Also reported that the LG had fullfilled all requirements to get IPPKH by December 2017 as informed in the Letter sent by Malang District to the Ministry of Public Works and Housing dated 7 February 2018. The IPPKH for Southern Road Development Project was finally issued in March 2018.

2.1.4. Central Java

22. Lot 1: CW-01 Tambakmulyo - Wawar – As reported in the previous monitoring report, it was concluded that compensation payment for affected land and non-land assets complies with the LARP 2011. No depreciation for the compensation of affected structure was applied by the Kebumen LG. All compensation payments have been


9

delivered to all AHs on 29 December 2017; only the Village land remains to be paid in full with payment on standby until administrative procedural requirements within government are completed.

23. Land ownership update. Interviews were conducted on three AHs from Tegalretno Village (namely Zaenal, Surtijan and Saodah) that were completed in 2011 to validate land ownership pates as administered by LAC. No fees were charged to the AHs. Remaining land ownership of affected lands pertains to Surat Pembayaran Pajak Terutang (SPPT) or letter of payable tax payment. According Heads of Villages, not all SPPTs have been updated. SPPT ownership in Tegalretno Village and Tambakmulyo (affected in 2012) have been completed, while SPPT ownership in Surorejan, Waluyorejo and Tambakmulyo Sta 0+00 have not been fully updated.

24. During field visit in April 2018, CTC was able to conduct FGDs in six affected villages, i.e Village of Tambakmulyo, Surorejan, Waluyorejo, Sidoharjo, Karanggadung and Tegalretno, to get their perception to LARP as regards the project in general as highlights below.

On Compensation - AHs affected by additional land acquisition for Sta 0+00 expressed their satisfaction to compensation of affected structures and trees; AHs who attended FGDs stated that compensation they received were used to rebuild, repair, and improve their affected house and improve their farming capacity (i.e., purchase fertilizer). Those from Tambakmulyo Village question about the unit rate for affected land which was the same for all affected land without consider location and occupation of land. They learnt this was different with the previous/2012 land acquisition. The LAC explained that the unit rate is determined /given already by independent appraiser and have to use as reference. The LAC could not change the unit rate. All of them also said they had enough time for repaired the affected structure or built other house (for relocating AHs) before project demolished their asset;

Socialization and Disclosure - All participants confirmed that they got information about the project from the LAC and local government during socialization as well as from the project staff. All of them were involved when the LAC conducted detailed measurement survey. The contractor also conducted socialization in their village to explain about road development;

Project Impacts – Enumerated positive impacts are: (i) boost the economy, (ii) increase in land price (more than twice than before the road was constructed), (iii) better access for farmers to market and distribute their products, and (iv) open kiosks/shops. Negative impacts are: (i) dust, (ii) increased number of accidents after road was paved especially due to the absence of road signs and street lights; and (iii) damage to existing village roads due to mobilization of material and equipment.

Other Issues

- Ibu Tukirah, an AH, complained that her rice paddy experience flooding due to water discharge from the road drainage. According to information from Kebumen Public Works (also a member of the Land Acquisition Team) who accompanied the team during field assessment, the Kebumen local government acquired the land needed for the project as per project request. In that location, the project (PPK) asked for additional land acquisition - 100 m to the right and left side of Tambakmulyo intersection. The existing waterways in that location is located more than 100 m away hence the flooding.

- Participants asked about updating of land ownership certificates with respect to their remaining lands. The process has been taking long and their tax documents still refer to the original dimensions/measurements. According to a


10

LAC member, the process may take time, since they still have to wait for budget availability.

- Delay in the replacement of access roads to their houses that were during drainage construction. Some AHs could not wait and repaired the access by themselves.

- Participants also hope more road signs and lamps be installed alongside the road sections.

- Increasing number of accidents among young people after road pavement was completed.

- Often, the road is used for illegal motorbike races, participants mostly are not from the affected village. Further, the womenfolk expressed their concern about young people who use the road for night dates as road lighting have not been installed yet. They find the situation quite disturbing since these may have a bad influence to their children.

25. Lot 2: CW-02 Giriwoyo – Duwet. As reported in the previous monitoring report, the 7 households which refused the land compensation are still unresolved; the compensation funds were already put in the Court. Those seven aggrieved AHs requesting recalculation of compensation value, and they would file the complaint to the higher court if the LG didn’t meet their request. But since the DGH had decided to use the existing alignment, and thus will not require having seven properties cleared, will not delay the implementation schedule. Construction works have been completed on 15 December 2017. No other complaints related with resettlement were recorded to date.

26. Lot 3: CW-03 Congot – Wawar. All affected households (estimated 2,663 households) have been completely paid between 2005-2007 and no complaints pertinent to resettlement were raised by AHs up to this monitoring period.

2.2 Income Restoration Program (IRP)

2.2.1. West Kalimantan

27. Sosok-Tayan; Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau. As reported in the previous monitoring report, in reference to the 2011 LARP, it had been documented that of the 387 AHs, there are 11 vulnerable AHs (Table 4). However, at implementation, where the total AHs increased to 477, those vulnerable similarly increased to 36 AHs. Since there were no details in the LARP 2011 about the AHs, CTC traced AHs participation to LRP per RRDP-affected village. This resulted to a documentation of 140 AHs deemed vulnerable by the local government. Sanggau local government had incorporated members of customary communities that were not included in the LARP 2011 list resulting to a final total of 140 AHs regardless of earlier defined vulnerabilities limited to (i) poverty, (ii) female-headed AH, (iii) elderly-headed AH, and (iv) disable-headed AH. Inclusion of AHs to LRP went beyond the impacts or losses as documented at detailed measurement survey and considered indirect impacts to customary. CTC verified that a large number of the 140 AHs had monthly household incomes that range from Rp 500,000 – Rp 1,000,000. Considering that the poverty line for the province (BPS, 2011) at the time was Rp 336,019 per person or Rp 1,322,076 per household, thus these AHs are deemed poor.

Table 4. AHs in Sanggau RRDP-LRP

Total AHs

Severe AHs Vulnerable AHs AHs for LRP Relocating Non-relocating Poor FHH Elderly Disabled Total

In LARP 2011

387 - -

1 10

11 11

At Implementation

477 - - 17 9 14 1 36* 140 *5 AHs are categorized in 2 categories of vulnerability


11

28. About 73% of the 15 LRPs implemented in the area are mostly on agri-fisheries followed by social protection, direct assistance to vulnerable (20%), and for small scale business enterprise (7%). The support was largely in-kind at 40%, followed by training (27%), training with support (20%), and cash (13%). Mechanisms to join the LRP was predominantly through group membership (93%) applied by four agencies.

29. Of the total 5,444 participating households, only 3% or 140 are RRDP-AHs though the listing above is 386 AHs due to multiple AH participation to LRP through its other household members as well as multiple availment of LRP. All the 140 AHs are members of customary communities. With respect to gender, a mere 6% (8 AHs) are female headed. However, about 9% or 13 AHs have active and direct participation by the wives. Altogether, participation of women is 15% on a household basis.

30. As description above, in CW-05 of Sanggau, West Kalimantan, RRDP is deemed compliant to LARP conditionalities for LRP. There are no outstanding issues thereby no need for an action plan. Detailed information of LRP implementation and AHs are found in the LARP Implementation Report as prepared by CTC.

31. Tebas-Singkawang - Sambas Bypass: Galing-Tanjung Harapan; Aruk (Bts. Serawak)-Sp. Tanjung. The Sambas LG implemented LRPs to residents living along the project road that included affected households. The target under RRDP is 31 AHs to be included for LRP, and these are all vulnerable AHs. Since there were no details in the LARP 2011 about the AHs, tracer of AHs participation to LRP per RRDP-affected village need to be done. Since DSC have limitation of resources,they could not provided data of participation AHs in the LRP, then CTC was traced to the site during 3 to 11 July 2018. According to that field visit the vulnerable AHs were derived and confirmed by the Head of Financial Affairs of Kaliau Village as summarized in Table 5.

Table 5. Vulnerable AHs in CW-06 and CW-07 Entitled to RRDP-LRP

Project Stage Poor FHH Elderly Disabled IPs Total

Planning - 9 27 -

36

Implementation 31 7 21 1 22 54

32. The table further shows that at implementation, of the 54 vulnerable AHs, 57.4% are poor, 13% are female-headed, 38.9% are elderly-headed, 1.9% disable-headed, and 40.7% are from customary communities.

33. It is also evident that the local government at implementation included AHs belonging to customary communities to be part of the vulnerable AHs entitled for LRP. The villages alongside several links road in Kabupaten Sambas were occupied by a mix by ethnic groups. The Dayak per LARP have been empowered for more than a decade, and have been integrated into the wider socio-economic and cultural community. They have retained many aspects of their traditional culture which are important to them.

Program Types and Budget Allocation

34. As per entitlement in the LARP 2011, vulnerable and severely AHs are entitled to avail of LRP and the opportunity to work in project-related jobs. Following are the LRPs extended to RRDP-AHs through APBD Sambas District in 2017.

a. Agriculture and Livestock Agency of Sambas Regency

35. The programs from Agriculture and Livestock Agency are given to the groups in the form of providing high quality seeds of rice, orange plant and NPK fertilizer. Prior to get the program, the group should submit a proposal. The groups whose proposal accepted will get the program. Some AHs received more than 1 program.


12

Development of Seed Nursery - Provision of Rice Seeds (Pengembangan Pembenihan/ Pembibitan Tanaman Pangan – Pengadaan Benih Padi) - The program is delivered in 2015 in Semparuk Village to 3 farmer groups (Pajar Menyingsing, Sinar Tani and Baru Membangun) with the total beneficiaries is 75 persons. Of the total 75 beneficiaries, 4 AHs which belong to 2 groups (Pajar Menyingsing and Sinar Tani) received the program. Among 4 AHs, only 1 AH is categorized as vulnerable household.

Development of Seed Nursery - Provision of Rice Seeds - The program is delivered in 2016 with the total beneficiaries is 509 persons belong to 7 farmer groups (Sinar Tani, Bunga Rampai 2, Bujang Dare, Pembangunan 1, Mandiri 2, Mekar Jaya 2, Pembangunan 2). 5 AHs (3 vulnerable households) who received the program belong to 3 groups (Sinar Tani, Bunga Rampai 2, Pembangunan 1).

Increase Production, Productivity and Quality of Food Crops: Provision of “Hazton” Rice (Program Peningkatan Produksi, Produktivitas dan Mutu Hasil Tanaman Pangan: Bantuan Pengembangan Padi Hazton) - The program is delivered in 2017 in Semparuk Subdistrict to 7 farmer groups (Sinar Tani, Bunga Rampai 2, Bidadari, Pembangunan 1, Mutiara, Mekar Jaya 2, Baru Membangun) with the total 469 beneficiaries. Of 469 beneficiaries, 7 AHs (4 Vulnerable HHs) belong to 3 groups (Sinar Tani, Pembangunan 1, Mutiara) received the program.

Provision of orange plant (Kegiatan Pengadaan Sarana dan Prasarana Pembenihan Hortikultura Pengadaan Jeruk) - The program is given in 2016 in Lorong Village in the form of providing orange plant/ stems. The total beneficiaries is about 30 persons belong to 2 groups. Each person received 60-70 orange stems. Of the total 30 persons as the program beneficiaries, 5 AHs received the program. Beside the orange stems, the groups also get mentoring every Wednesday.

Food Crop Intensification Development Program (rice, crops) for Provision of NPK Fertilizer (Program Pengembangan Intensifikasi Tanaman Pangan (Padi, Palawija) untuk Pengadaan Pupuk NPK)

Seed Development Program/ Crop Nursery (Provision of “Purple” Rice Seeds) (Program Pengembangan Perbenihan/ Pembibitan Tanaman Pangan (Pengadaan Benih Padi Label Ungu) - Food Crop Intensification Development Program (rice, crops) for Provision of NPK Fertilizer and Seed Development Program/ Crop Nursery (Provision of “Purple” Rice Seeds) are delivered in 2015 in Kaliau Village to 10 groups (approximately 300 persons). Each group consists of 25-30 members. Of the total 300 persons, 22 AHs which are also categorized as vulnerable HHs received the program.

b. Social Affairs, Manpower and Transmigration Agency of Sambas Regency

36. Materials for fixing the house (Bantuan Bahan Bangunan Rumah) - The program was delivered in 2013 in Sambas Subdistrict. Zinc roofing materials were provided to poor households to fix their houses. Beneficiaries are recommended to agency by village heads. Of the total 12 households as beneficiaries, 7 AHs in Kaliau Village received the LRP. All 7 AHs are also categorized as vulnerable HHs.

c. Public Housing, Residential Area and Environment Agency

37. Development of Drinking Water and Wastewater Management Performance - Construction of PAH Tanks (Program Pengembangan Kinerja Pengelolaan Air Minum dan Air Limbah (Pembangunan PAH)) - The program is delivered in 2017 in Lorong Village. Total PAH Tanks (Rainwater Harvesting Tanks) constructed is about 70 PAH tanks with the total beneficiaries are ± 700 HHs. Of 700 household beneficiaries, 101 vulnerable HHs received the program. 11 PAH Tanks constructed in front of AHs house, the rest are built in front of the other beneficiaries house. The water from the tank is not


13

only be used by AHs, but also people who live around it. In order to receive this program, the group should submit the proposal.

38. Program cost. Table 6 shows that the total LRP cost for Sambas-Singkawang is Rp 2,477,150,000. Participating RRDP AHs availed of Rp 1,403,484 each with minimum value of Rp 36,837 for Development of Seed Nursery - Provision of Rice Seeds and maximum at Rp 7,500,000 for Materials for fixing the house (Bantuan Bahan Bangunan Rumah).

Table 6. Sambas and Singkawang LRP Cost Details

No Agency No Program Year Total Budget

(Rp) Total # of

Beneficiaries

# of RRDP

AHs/APs

LRP / HH (Rp)

% Budget From Total

3 8

2,477,150,000

2,095 155 1,403,484 100.00%

1 Agriculture and Livestock Agency of Sambas Regency

2015-2017

2,317,400,000

1,383 47 2,200,760 93.55%

1 Development of Seed Nursery - Provision of Rice Seeds (Pengembangan Pembenihan/ Pembibitan Tanaman Pangan – Pengadaan Benih Padi)

2015 1,875,000 75 4 25,000

2 Development of Seed Nursery - Provision of Rice Seeds

2016 18,750,000 509 7 36,837

3 Increase Production, Productivity and Quality of Food Crops: Provision of “Hazton” Rice (Program Peningkatan Produksi, Produktivitas dan Mutu Hasil Tanaman Pangan: Bantuan Pengembangan Padi Hazton)

2017 2,272,400,000

469 9 4,845,203

4 Provision of orange plant (Kegiatan Pengadaan Sarana dan Prasarana Pembenihan Hortikultura Pengadaan Jeruk)

2016 20,000,000 30 5 666,667

5 Food Crop Intensification Development Program (rice, crops) for Provision of NPK Fertilizer (Program Pengembangan Intensifikasi Tanaman Pangan (Padi, Palawija) untuk Pengadaan Pupuk

2015 2,500,000 300 22 14,583.33


14

No Agency No Program Year Total Budget

(Rp) Total # of

Beneficiaries

# of RRDP

AHs/APs

LRP / HH (Rp)

% Budget From Total

NPK)

6 Seed Development Program/ Crop Nursery (Provision of “Purple” Rice Seeds) (Program Pengembangan Perbenihan/ Pembibitan Tanaman Pangan (Pengadaan Benih Padi Label Ungu)

2015 1,875,000

2 Social Affairs, Manpower and Transmigration Agency of Sambas Regency

2013 90,000,000 12 7 7,500,000 3.63%

7 Materials for fixing the house (Bantuan Bahan Bangunan Rumah)

2013 90,000,000 12 7 7,500,000

3 Public Housing, Residential Area and Environment Agency

2017 69,750,000 700 101 99,643 2.82%

8 Development of Drinking Water and Wastewater Management Performance - Construction of PAH Tanks (Program Pengembangan Kinerja Pengelolaan Air Minum dan Air Limbah (Pembangunan PAH))

2017 69,750,000 700 101 99,643

AH Participation to and Perception about RRDP-LRP

39. Interviews and focus group discussions were conducted by CTC between November 2017 to July 2018 to determine the perceptions of AHs as regards participation to LRP. It was established that AHs have availed of LRP from the local government specifically in the form of fertilizers for their plantation, other AHs received rubber seeds though once. As regards business opportunities, the FGD participating HHs declared that during construction, it was not good for sale/business. But after construction, many HHs are able to put up "Lelong” or shop that sells used clothes and shoes, shops that sell basic needs, restaurants and motorbike workshop, and fuel shops. Some AHs engaged in duck production through the local government but were not sure if these were related to RRDP initiatives.

40. In July 2018, CTC interviewed Mr. Yanto, LRP recipient of fertilizer and rice seeds from the Agriculture and Livestock Agency in Kaliau Village, Sajingan Besar Subdistrict. He mentioned that there is training from the Sambas local government through a non-government organization that was given only after the head of the sub district requested for the training from the agency. Due to issues about the irrigation system by another project, Mr. Yanto found that the program does not improve his livelihood.


15

41. The table further shows that at implementation, of the 54 vulnerable AHs, 57.4% are poor, 13% are female-headed, 38.9% are elderly-headed, 1.9% disable-headed, and 40.7% are from customary communities.

42. Tanjung Harapan - Sambas (Missing Link). A total of 52 vulnerable AHs were identified during RP preparation as shown in Table 7. There was a decrease of 4 AHs to be subject to LRP at implementation in 2017 and this was due to double listing of AHs to be vulnerable at RP preparation. Thus, from 52 AHs deemed vulnerable, this has been validated by CTC in 2018 to be 48 AHs. Of the total 88 AHs at RP preparation, 36 AHs (40.4%) reported to have a monthly household income of less than West Kalimantan’s Provincial poverty threshold of IDR 375,459.00 per person/month thus are considered poor.

Table 7. AHs in Missing Link RRDP-LRP

Total AHs

Severe AHs Vulnerable AHs AHs for

LRP Relocating

Non-relocating Poor FHH Elderly Disabled Total

LARP 2017

88 - - 36 11 20 4 71* 52

At Implementation

89 - - 32 11 19 4 66* 48 * Indicates multiple vulnerability for some AHs

43. As reported in the previous monitoring report. There are 3 LRPs programs were implemented by 3 agencies from Sambas local government i.e. Agriculture and Food Security Agency, Cooperative; Small Medium Enterprises and the Industrial and Trading Agency; Fisheries, Livestock and Animal Health Agency. The program was not specifically dedicated to address vulnerable AHs as per RP 2017. The beneficiaries were members of select community groups that have prepared and proposed programs in 2016. Only if the people listed in the RP document become a member of the group then they will benefit from the program. According to verification done by CTC, it was confirmed that there were only 11 AHs of 48 vulnerable AHs who participated in the 2017 FY programs: 5 participants from Tambatan Village, 2 AHs from Kubangga Village and 4 AHs (5 persons participated) from Sepadu Village. Overall LRP cost for Missing link is Rp 62,000,000. With the current participating 11 AHs (12 persons including family member) as against a total of 180 beneficiaries, the average cost per household is Rp 344,444.

44. With a target of 48 AHs for inclusion to LRP, only 11 have been documented thus a deficit of 37 AHs need to be ensured LRP participation before project ends. Of the 48 AHs, 23% or 11 AHs are female-headed and of the 11 AHs already provided with LRP, 2 AHs are female-headed although 6 male headed AHs reported that their wives are the direct participants to LRP. Thus for the 11 AHs, 8 AHs (73%) have women as LRP recipients. Letter from Head of PMU on behalf of DGH to Bupati Sambas requested remaining vulnerable AHs have to be included in the program 2018 FY have been sent on 25 May 2018 .

45. In accordance with agreements during the ADB mission on November 2017, Sambas local government allocated budget (IDR 162,480,100.00) for 2018 FY specifically for LRP to cover RRDP vulnerable AHs. Some of the proposed programs could not be considered as LRP and are currently being realigned for the remaining 37 as committed in forthcoming and acceptable LRPs. As agreed by Sambas LG, 7 whose bussiness was affected will be included as beneficiaries of livelihood restoration programs for a total of 44 remaining AHs for LRP..

46. Current status of the above commitment is based on information from Mr. Murzani, Head of Economy, Natural Resources, Infrastructure and Territory Subdivision II of Bappeda. He avers that meetings were held with TAPD (Tim Anggaran Pemerintah Daerah/ Local Government Budget Team) in 8-9 August 2018. The programs to be


16

implemented for inclusion of the entitled 44 AHs will be taken on by two agencies, namely; (i) the Agriculture and Food Security Agency and Cooperative, and (ii) Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME), Industry and Trading Agency (Dinas Koperasi, UMKM, Perindustrian dan Perdagangan/ Diskumindag). The programs and its corresponding budget are still being discussed.

47. Detailed information of LRP implementation and AHs are found in the LRP Implementation Report as prepared by CTC.

48. Aruk (Bts. Serawak)-Sp. Tanjung. LRP was completed in September 2017 in the form Bantuan Tanaman Bibit Lada given to 3 vulnerable Ahs. The responsible agency was PT. Waskita Karya (Persero) TBK through its corporate social responsibility (CSR). Seedling assistance was given to vulnerable AHs through training for pepper farming. The total project cost is Rp 5,175,000 with each AH availing of Rp 1,725,000. Generally, the AHs are satisfied with the LRP. They specifically expressed the need for more LRP training on agricultural production complete with capital infusion.

2.2.2. North Kalimantan

49. Bulungan. Aside from compensation for affected assets, Bulungan District committed to provide land certificates to all AHs. However, as indicated in the previous monitoring report, there is no budget allocated for that purpose. However, local government budget never materialized for that purpose. DGH therefore requested that such assistance be converted to LRP. This issue also discussed when SDEARS and CTC meeting on 3 April 2018, but the list of LRP was never generated from Bulungan District.

50. CTC then conducted interviews with AHs to validate if indeed they had availed of economic empowerment programs from the Bulungan local government related to RRDP. Interviews on 3 AHs were conducted by CTC and results indicate that some AHs have availed of programs from the District Agriculture Agency in the form of training and support to improve cultivation and the District Food Security Agency for food processing. LRP availment was mostly through group membership. Recipients of LRP are largely satisfied with the initiatives. For those who have not been included, especially migrant households, they feel that non-migrants are prioritized by the government.

51. Detailed information of LRP implementation and AHs are found in the LRP

Implementation Report as prepared by CTC.

52. Nunukan. During LARP preparation, only 3 AHs were identified to be vulnerable at implementation, this increased to 62 AHs. Based on verification conducted by CTC-October 2015, additional AHs were affected through losses and/or damage to their plants/crops, which are mostly palm oil --- planted after the inventory of losses for LARP. Of these additional AHs, at implementation 12 are deemed vulnerable thereby requiring LRP.

53. As reported in the previous monitoring report, LRP is more on social protection or direct assistance to the 12 vulnerable AHs as individual households and not through groups. The assistance is in the form of subsidy through the Rastra – Beras Sejahtera of the Ministry of Social Affairs (Kementerian Sosial RI) dibawah (Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (TPN2K)- National Team for Acceleration of Poverty Alleviation). From 2013 to 2017, rice subsidy was implemented to AHs where each household could purchase 15 kg per month at a price of Rp.1,600 per kg (subsidy is Rp.7,500 per kg-per household). Since 2018, the program was given in the form of free 10 kg of rice per household per month (Rp. 11,000 per kg). The total cost for LRP in Nunukan is Rp 1,262,010,000 covering 2013-2018 that included the 12 RRDP AHs. Based on valuation through the years, each AHs has received Rp 1,343,993.61. There are no female-headed households amongst the 12 AHs. AHs aver that they are recipients of the Rastra program provided by the local government and that they consider this LRP to be very helpful to their household needs. They still hope for program continuity.


17


2.2.3. East Java

55. There are 54 AHs enlisted for LRP assistance by Malang local government and all programs have been completed in 2015. Rather, LRP is committed by Malang local government to address and strengthen entitlements. Two programs were implemented by Malang local government (i) Badan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat/BPM, pada Bidang Pemberdayaan Usaha Ekonomi Desa and (ii) Dinas Kehutanan Kabupaten Malang, pada Bidang Penatagunaan dan Pemanfaatan Hutan. The basis for AP participation is the Social Survey and Land Compensation by ADB in 2011 as validated and confirmed by Bappeda of Malang Regency.

56. The 1st LRP involves Training Programs provided and assistance extended with the aim of restoring the livelihoods of affected people. Support is given to participants as an aid to implement the training results. The 2nd LRP involves the provision of seedlings for farmers such as sengon, durian and mango. The total cost for the 2 LRPs is Rp 447,808,248 where on the average, each AH received Rp 4,146,373. Participation rate is overwhelming for CW-04 as all 54 AHs availed of LRP benefits more than once. Participants were enthusiastic about the LRP because they feel this is what they really need. The training greatly increased their capacities. However, beyond the gerobak, they expressed their desire to also secure capital. Overall, only 6% of female-headed AHs were able to access LRP. However, with multiple participation, the predominantly male-headed AHs doubled participation through their wives.

2.2.4. Central Java

57. Lot 1: CW-01 Tambakmulyo - Wawar. During LARP preparation in 2010-2011, the identified AHs amounted to 1,214 where about 52 AHs were candidates for LRP at the time. During implementation specifically in 2016, the number increased due to the change in design at Sta 0+00 affecting an additional 26 households. As can be discerned from the original LARP it targeted 52 AHs for LRP, this increased to 76 AHs at implementation who were deemed vulnerable and severely affected that most (45 AHs) requiring relocation.

58. As reported in the previous monitoring report At the time of LARP processing, Kebumen local government committed 18 potential LRPs to address the needs of 52 AHs identified then. According to verifification in the site shown that of the 18 committed LRPs, only 3 LRPs were verified to have included AHs. The rest were (i) no information available, (ii) unverifiable, and (iii) LRP not applicable to needs of AHs. In the case of (iii), it was determined that the committed LRP at the time had as a key criterion – poor AHs. Inasmuch as the program was targeted in areas where there were no poor AHs, these AHs were not included. The village officials from Tegalretno, Waluyorejo, and Surorejan who met by CTC also said the same, the Programs were already applied in early 2012, but the target beneficiaries were mainly poor households who did not reside along the road where the AHs were located. Most AHs were not categorized as poor people. Some programs still continue to date though some with different names, while other programs have stopped.

59. During site verification, CTC also was able to identified programs applied for the AHs during 2012 to 2018. A total of 23 programs were initiated by Kebumen of which 21 were processed by CTC. CTC was able to confirm 32 AHs who availed of LRPs and these were traced to 21 LRPs implemented in Kebumen by 16 agencies from national to village levels. The LRPs were along the three general areas of (i) agriculture and fisheries, (ii) small scale business or entrepreneurship, and (iii) social protection or direct assistance to the vulnerable sector. Agriculture and fisheries ranked high at 57% generally focused on increased and sustainable production, followed by social protection


18

(33%), and small scale business (10%).

60. Of the total 1,094 LRP beneficiaries, only the CTC-confirmed 32 AHs (or 3%) and there may be more, but data at time of fielding by CTC and ADB staff consultant was not available. It is noted that some of these 32 AHs were able to enlist in more than 1 LRP thus actual listing reflect 47 AHs participating in LRPs. Based on CTC site visit from 10 to 13 April 2018, interviewed village heads and their staff from six affected villages (Tambakmulyo, Surorejan, Waluyorejo, Sidoharjo, Tegalretno and Karanggadung) and Bappeda Staff, claim that many programs were delivered to farmer-groups from 2012 to 2018. All Kebumen farmers participated as members of farmer-groups in their respective hamlets. Despite the difficulty to establish participation of AHs in each program, it can generally be concluded that AHs were beneficiaries of one or more programs. Several other factors affected the assessment that generated a relatively low count are as follows:

(i) There are 18 AHs have either moved out of the area (other village/ subdistrict or province or are now deceased Several entitled AHs are now deceased;

(ii) For AHs with businesses who also derive income from farming, they claim to have received programs through farmer/farmers groups (such as provision of seeds and subsidized of agriculture input) but CTC was limited in further validating such claims.

(iii) A number of entitled AHs are non-poor and some are not farmers (they derive income from business). Mostly LRPs by Kebumen local government only covered poor households and farmers (Kebumen is one of the rice granaries for Central Java Province).

61. It can be said that by and large, CW-01 of RRDP is compliant to LRP conditionalities set out in the LARP 2011 despite the additional AHs at implementation. On the other hand, it is still necessary for project management to secure a more complete documentation of income restoration activities conducted by the local government. The PMU Head on behalf of DGH has sent a letter to Bappeda Kebumen seeking assistance to provide more comprehensive data on the participation of AHs in local government programs.


3. OUTSTANDING ISSUES ON RESETTLEMENT, STATUS, AND CORRESPONDING PLAN OF ACTION

3.1 West Kalimantan

63. As of this period some outstanding issues for road sections in West Kalimantan have been settled/ solved as presented in above sections of this report. Table 8 provides a summary of progress on previous issues and remaining outstanding issues from West Kalimantan as of Aug 2018.


19

Table 8. Remaining Outstanding Issues from West Kalimantan as of August 2018

West Kalimantan

Outstanding Issue Status

Follow up action

Action Responsible

Institution Deadline

Sambas-Tanjung Harapan (Missing Link)

With respect to Missing link, ensure that allowances for 7 affected shop owners and 37 vulnerable and severely AHs are fully provided by 2018

As per communication with Bappeda Sambas District, he avers that meetings were held with TAPD (Tim Anggaran Pemerintah Daerah/ Local Government Budget Team) in 8-9 August 2018. There are two programs to be implemented for inclusion of the entitled 44 AHs will be taken on by two agencies, namely; (i) the Agriculture and Food Security Agency and Cooperative, and (ii) Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME), Industry and Trading Agency (Dinas Koperasi, UMKM, Perindustrian dan Perdagangan/ Diskumindag). The programs and its corresponding budget are still

being discussed.

CTC to communicate with Bappeda in order to ensure 44 AHs will included in the progams through APBD Perubahan 2018. Secured copy of budget allocated for the programs

DGH assisted by CTC

October 2018

Sosok – Tayan; Sp. Tanjung-Bts Kota Sanggau (CW-05)

Optimazion of available ROW to build drainage at Sosok intersection and outlet of cross drain in Sta 24+500

As per communication with PPK and coordination with Quality Engineer of CTC stated construction on both location have not completed. No private land was affected

Periodically monitoring to ensure no private land will affected

Documentation any back up supporting the action plan

CTC to monitor and assist

October 2018

3.2 North Kalimantan

65. As of August 2018, Table 9 enumerates outstanding issues for North Kalimantan road sections.

Table 9. Remaining Outstanding Issues from North Kalimantan as of August 2018

North Kalimantan


Status/ Comment

Action Responsible


Bulungan

Top up depreciation of affected structures in the form of programs for AHs by 2018

- As per May 2018, Bupati Bulungan instructed several institution within Bulungan LG to allocate some appropriate programs to cover up depreciations

- Some compensation for additional affected trees

Further coordination among Balai Besar/DGH with Bulungan LG about measurement to adress this issues.

ADB will send letter to DGH

Balai Besar/ DGH assisted by CTC

October 2018

Compensate 143 AHs for affected trees


20

North Kalimantan


Status/ Comment

Action Responsible


paid using contractor budget. AH allow the contractor to complete construction work

- Compensation given by contractor only in the form of uang kerohiman, which is not comply with principle in the entitlement matrix

- SDEARS and CTC

consulted with Land Acquisition Subdirectorate of the DGH on the possibility to address this issue.

request action taken to adress this issues

As recommended by LA Subdirectorate, DGH/ Balai Balikpapan will send letter to ASPIDATUN of Kejaksaan Tinggi North Kalimantan Province ask legal opinion to provide compensation of affected trees

Meeting between ADB IRM and DGH to take any possibility action to resolve this issues

ADB IRM

Balai Balikapan

September 2018

September 2018

3.3 East Java

66. No more issues related to this road section as of Aug 2018.

3.4 Central Java

67. Lot 1: CW-01 Tambakmulyo – Wawar: Table 10 presents the remaining outstandings issues and corresponding required actions that need to be followed up.

Table 10. Remaining Outstanding Issues from Central Java as of August 2018

Central Java

Outstanding Issues Status

Follow Up Action

Action Responsible


Compensate/replace the affected village land of Tambakmulyo

Update land ownership

records of AHs in Surorejan, Waluyorejo and Tambakmulyo Sta 0+00

As per August 2018 it was informed that Tambakmulyo Village land have not replaced yet since administration requirement have not completed

Also land ownership update for some AHs in Surorejan,Waluyorejo and Tambakmulyo Sta 0+00 have not complete

DGH to monitor until completed by Kebumen District

DGH 1st Qtr 2019


21

Central Java

Outstanding Issues Status

Follow Up Action

Action Responsible


Complete documentation of allowances extended to relocating AHs, shop owners, and 44 vulnerable and severely AHs provided with LRP

List of programs in 2012 FY committed by LG and LRP applied in 2012-2017 have been obtained

It can be said that by and large, CW-01 of RRDP is compliant to LRP conditionality’s set out in the LARP 2011 despite the additional AHs at implementation is a more complete documentation of income restoration activities conducted by the local government. Head of PMU on behalf of DGH have been sent letter to Bappeda Kebumen asked them to help in providing more comprehensive data on the participation of Ahs in the LG programs.

CTC will assisted DGH to trace participation of 44 AHs by interview each household

CTC

September 2018


22

4. OTHER CONCERNS AND NOTATIONS

4.1 Internal and External Monitoring

68. With respect to internal monitoring, it is currently being addressed by DGH, as evidenced by this.

69. Due to delays in the engagement of the, DGH proposed that the services of the EMA will be engaged through the CTC Consultancy Contract whereby, an external consultant or an NGO will be procured by CTC. The CTC will only act as the conduit for procurement and administration, whereas the tasks and the scope of work of EMA will be completely independent from CTC. Bidding process began on 16 October 2017. The evaluation of bidding documents has been completed and has been awarded to Equator, and the contract was signed on March 29, 2018 and a time period of four (4) months was set for completion of services i.e time for completion was 29 July 2018.

70. The Inception Report have been submitted and discussed with ADB and DGH as well during May 2018. As per the TOR of services required the EMA have to present the summary of its work and findings of the assignment, and present the key summary of the Final Report before submission of the final report. The event was held on 26 July 2018 at Hotel Amos Cozy in Jakarta. The event was attended by DGH, ADB and following are key points from the presentation event :

Evaluation and analysis: The compliance assessment should clearly refer to the principles in the ADB SPS 2009 framework and entitlement matrix in each LARP/RP. Compliance must be closely linked to the content and purpose. It was also felt that consistency between general and specific findings need to be taken into account. EMA should also analyse the process within the institutions implementing LARP and RP (Institutional arrangements).

Data Analysis: Data processing still has to be improved and survey findings need to be processed in terms of RP and baseline data.

IP and Gender Analysis: Gender perspective should elaborate on the results of the gender analysis and studies related to indigenous people need to be resulted in recommendations for improvement in the future projects.

Additional field visit: The EMA teams has not visited Aruk, thus the data and information remain unconfirmed. Therefore, it is suggested to visit Aruk to collect additional data and information. In addition, Sambas need to be visited because Sambas Local Government played critical role in implementing RP in many places including Missing Link.

71. During the presentation, it was also observed by ADB Resettlement officer and Project officer that the data needs to improved so the analysis and results of the monitoring tasks are more comprehensive and have a sound database to support the findings. Reliance on assumptions and interpolation of data should be avoided as much as possible. This was also shared by others attendees of the meeting.

72. In order to complete the field work and complete the current incomplete analysis and final reports, it proposed for extension in the Contract time for EMA by 2 months i.e. up to 30 September 2018.


23

Appendix 1 Instruction Letter from Bupati Bulungan to Institutions within the District to Allocate Budget for that Programs as Requested by the DGH


24


25


26

Appendix 2 Receipts of “Kerohiman” Provided by the Contractors to Aggrieved AHs whose Plants Have not Been Paid


27


28


29


30


31


32


33


34


35


36


37


38


39


40


41

Social Monitoring Report - adb.org · NOTES This social monitoring report is a document of the...

Documents

Transcript of Social Monitoring Report - adb.org · NOTES This social monitoring report is a document of the...