SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING
197
UNCLASSIFIED AD-740 925 CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING A DDC BIBLIOGRAPHY DDC-TAS-72-11-1 APRIL 1972 -. , Rap, U¢ced by NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE - :111 -.. h'l~ Id, Va 22151 | Approved for public release; F distribution unlimited. '• UNCLASSIFIED I, 6*
Transcript of SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING
UNCLASSIFIED AD-740 925
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS:
SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING
A DDC BIBLIOGRAPHY
DDC-TAS-72-11-1
APRIL 1972 -.,
Rap, U¢ced by
NATIONAL TECHNICALINFORMATION SERVICE - :111
-.. h'l~ Id, Va 22151 |
Approved for public release; Fdistribution unlimited.
'• UNCLASSIFIED
I, 6*
UP- ASSIFIEDSecurity caa~ssaicatioao
DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA.- R & D(Socisvity cI...lfk.AIti, .1 flitD. 6"y of .betlmct a"4 hedomndah. ~omltlj mwust be '4 .'h.. thii amt,.lfvp., lI'hi
I ORIOGINATING ACTIVITY fCwNp..te au) REPORT SCCURI4TIV CL&tSu~lCA ?ION
DEFENSE DOCUMENTATION CENTER UnclassifiedCameron Station 2b. GROUP
Alexandria, Virginia 223143 REPORT TITLE
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING
4. OUSCRIPTIVE NOTEKS (rpw 014"w dad iouiinIw. dbfts)
Bibliographjy (August 1960 -August 1971)
9. REPORT DATE 7a. TOTAL NO OF PAGE$ 74. NO. OF REFS
April 197219146.CONTRACT OR GRANT NOes oniGiNIoR$ mirPOvii .umistaist
6. PROJIECT NO DDC-TAS-72-l 1-I
C. 06. OTNERt REPORT .401S1 (Anyp 0 etenumb-. dtheta~.y be ..aea.n.d
At AD-7 4 0 92510 OISTRISUOUION STATemeNTr
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12. SPONSORINGOMILITARV ACTIVITY
Supersedes AD-705 500
IN AIISTRACT
This bibliography -- one in a series on Civil Defense Systems -
contains a compilation of references on Social Impact and Manage-ment Planning. References contained in this volume pertain topsychological factors related to recavery from nuclear attack; publicresponse to community shelter planning; fallout shelter managementresponsibilities; emergency operations training; attitudes towardcivil defense; requirements for local planning to cover hazards offallout; food processing and distribution; and the roles of thedentist and pharmacists in national disasters. Entries wereprocessed into the Defense Documentation Center's data bank duringthe period of January 1953 through January 1972.
Other bibliographies in this series are: Freattack and Post-attack (Nuclear Warfare), and Shelters.
Corporate Author-Monitoring Agency, Subject, Title, Contract,and Report Number Indexes are included.
DD t'?ves'l473 UNCLASSIFIEDSecurity Cleasstficstbo
UNCLASSIFIEDSecurity Classification t_
14 LINK A L 6IK S L'Nt CKEY WORD0
RNOOLE WT VtOLi W'T ROLE "l
*Bibliographies*Civil Defense Systems*Management Planning*Social Impact
Cost EffectivenessEconomicsPublic OpinionSociologyTrainingCivil Defense PersonnelAttitudesAcceptabilitySocial PsychologyFallout Shelters
UNCLASSIFIEDScurlty CItaSS icatton
t~-AA
UNCLASSIFIED
AD-740 925
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS:
SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING
A DDC BIBLIOGRAPHY
DDC-TAS-72-11-1
August 1960 - August 1971
APRIL 1972
Approved for public release;distribution unlimited.
DEFENSE DOCUMENTATION CENTER
DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY
CAMERON STATION
ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314
UNCLASSIFIED
-&
FORE WORD
This bibliography is a compilation of references on
Civil Defenee Systeme: Social Impact and Management Planning
in a series of bibliographies on Civil Defense Systems.
Entries were processed into the Defense Documentation Center's
data bank during the period of January 1953 through January
1972. It revi--s and replaces an earlier bibliography,
AD-705 500.
Corporate Author-Monitoring Agency, Subject, Title,
Contract, and Report Number Indexes are included.
BY ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR. DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY
OFFICIAL
iRRT B. STEGMAAdministratorDefense Documentation Center
ill
CONT ENTS
Page
FOREWORD ............................................... iii
AD BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES ............................ 1
INDEXES
CORPORATE AUTHOR-MONITORING AGENCY ................. 0-1
SUBJECT ............................................ D-1
TITLE .............................................. T-1
CONTRACT ........................................... C-I
REPORT NUMBER ...................................... R-1
f
UNCLASSIFIEU
DOC REPORT BiBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
Ao-24q 98"
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON D C AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
CBR WARFARE RESkARCH AND CIVIL DEFENSE OF THE USSRAND COMMUNIST CHJNA& A BIBLIOGRAPHY (U)
AUG 60 IVMONITOR: AID 60-25
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: ARMED FORCES RESEARCH, BIBLlOGRAPwIESsbIOLOGICAL WARFAkEo CHEMICAL *ARFARE, CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS, MILITARY RESEARCH. RADIOLOGICAL WRFARE (U)
IDENTIFIERS: CHIý,Ao USSR (U)
UNCLASSIFICO /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHy SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7[A;)-271 4RESEARCH ANALYSIS CORP MCLEAN VA
CIVIL AFFAIKS5 THE FUTURE PROSPECTS OF A MILITARYRESPONSIBILITY (U)
IV KINGeJAMES Ev JR9;
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *MILITARYGOVERNMENT, OOPENATkI?;NS RESEARCH, FOREIGN POLICY (U)
UNCLASSIFIEu /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIE1
"DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCh CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AD-287 06URAND CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
THE RESOLUTION OF THE SOVIET CONTROVERSY OVER CIVIL
DEFENSE (U)
IV GOuREiLEONI
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
v.•SCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PROPAGANnA),uSSR, FOREIGN POLICY (U)
IDENTIFIERS: US5N (U)
SOME RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SOVIET CIVIL
DEFENSE PROGRAM ARE DESCRIBED* DIFFERENCES BETAEENFOREIGN AND DOMESTIC SOvIET PROAGpANDA ON CIVILDEFENSE ARE LISTED, AND A DEBATE AMONG THE SOVIET
LEADERS ON THE VALUE OF CIVIL DLFENSE Is DESCRIaED --A DEBATE THAT 4AS RESOLVED AT THE MAY 1962CONGRESS OF DOSAAF ITHE CIVIL VOLUNTEERORGANIZATION), RECENT VIGOROUS ENDORSEMENT OFVOSAAF bY PARTY AN•D PRESS MAY BC ONE INDICATIONOF IMPENDINt CHANGE5 IN SOVIET DOmESTiC AND
FOREIGN POLICIES, (AUTHOR) (U)
UI
UNCLASSIFIEO /ZM•L7
UN:CLASS I FI ED
DDC REPORT BIB.IO2RAPHy SEARCH CONTRoL NO. /ZMML7
AU-4O0 126HUDSON lNST INC HARMON.ON.HUDSON N Y
STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL ASpECTS OF CIVIL DEFENSE WITmSPECIAL EMPHASIS ON CRISIS SITUATIONS (U)
,JAN 63 IV bROWNoi41LLIAM i1o;
UNCLASSIFIED P8EPORT
DESCRIPTORS: sC&vIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, COMMAND + CONTROLSYSTEMS* FOOD, MEDICAL PERSONNEL, MEDICAL SUPPLIES,SHELTERS, STmATEGIC oARFARE (U)
STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL ASPECTS OF CIVIL DEFENSE wiTm SPECIA,
EMPHASIS ON cRISIS SITUATIONS.
4
UNCLASSIFIEV /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEU
ODC REPORT BIBLIUGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Nuo /ZMML7
AD-4t02 098HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN "A
AN APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL
EFFLCTS OF NUCLEAR ATTACK (U)
MAR 63 lV NORDLIEsPETER Go:
REPTv NO, RR 63 3 RR
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: Cs'vIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, BLHAVIOR, CULTURE,DISASTERS, NUCLEAR WARFARE, PSYCHOLO(Y, REACTIoN(PSY!CHOLOGY), SOCIOLUGY, STRESS (PSYCHOLOGY),SURVIVAL (U)
SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR ATTACK.
U 5
S•UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
If UNCLASSIFIED,
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGNAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /LMML7
AD-4U4 670APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERvICES 6AYNE PA
A CORE TRAINING PROGRAM FoR STATE LEVEL CIVILDEFENSE PROGRAM PLRSONNEL (APPENDICES), (U)
APR 63 Z93P FLETCHERDOROTHY EsMACPHERSONOUOUGLAS M*;SIEGELARTHUR 19;
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTONS; *CIVIL DEFENS9 SYSTEMS, TRAIN ING.SCHELULING, CONTROLs INSTRUCTION MANUALS,COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, CLASSIFICATIONs', OBANALYSIS.
(U)
APPENDICES TO A CORE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR STATE LEVELCIVIL OEFENSE PROGRAM PERSONNEL#
6
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLI06RAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-40 759APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICEi AAYNE PA
A CORE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR STATE LEVLL CIVILDEFENSE PROGRAM PERSONNEL, (U)
APR 63 20 9 P FLETCHERoDONOTHY Est
MACPHERSONoUOUGLAS HM;SIEGELAND ARTHUR 1.1CONTRACT: OCo OS6z 1z2
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: OCIvIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *TRAIN INal
CLASSIFICATIUN, COMMAND ANo CONTROL SYS TEMS,DECISION MAKING, SCHEDULING, CONTROL,INSTRUCTION MANUALS, JOB ANALYSIS. (U)
THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY *AS TO uERIVE INFORMATION REWUIR IMPROVING STATE LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSETRAINING AND TO APPLY THiS INFORMATION TO THEDEVELOPMENT OF REWUIRED COURSES FOR ACHIEVING THISPURPOSE, IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL, RESEARCH
WAS FIRST CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE THE TRAININGREQUIREMENTS FOR THE GOVERNMENTAL AND AUXILIARYPERSONNEL THAT ARE NEEDED TO IMPLE MENT STATE
CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONAL PLANS. SECOND,TRAINING MATERIALS OERE DEVELOPED To MEET THErEREQUIREMENTS, (AUTHOR) (U)
U 7
•-UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEU
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
RANU CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
RECENT JEVELOPMLNTS IN THE SOVIET CIVIL DLFENsEPROuRAM,
(U)
JUN 63 26 P 4OuRELEON |REPT. NO, P2752
UNCLAbSIFIEO REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE; PRLSENTED TO SUBCOMMITTEE NO* 3 oFTHE ARMEO SERVICES COMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE OFREPRESENT ATIVES. IASHINGTONe Do C., JUNE 17,1963s
DESCRIPTORS: OCIvIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS. TRAINING,SHELTERSt MILITARY STRATEGf, FUREIbN PO'.ICYSMILITARY ORGANIZA-IONS, hARFARE, ANALYSISo (U)
IDENTIFIERS: USSR* (U)
THE SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM IS FAR FROMCOMPLETE AND SUFFERS FROM A VARIETY OF SHORT COMINGS.APART FROM THE NOTORIOUS INEFFICIENCY OF SOVIETADMINISTRATION* THERE IS THE RELA TIVELY SHORT TIMETHAT MANY PERSONS WILL BE ABLE TO REMAIN IN SHELTERS,BECAUSE OF LIMITED FOOD SUPPLIES. GREAT CROWDINGAND ABSENCE OF COOLING EQUIPMENT AILL FORCE LARGENUMBERS OF THEM TO EVACUATE THEIR SHELTERS vIACONTAMINATED AREAS *HILE THE RADIATION LEVEL NAYSTILL BE FAIRLY HIGH*. THE SOVIETS RECOGNIZE THATTHE EFFECTIVENESS OF CIVIL DEFENSE. SURVIVING THEATTACK, AND WINNING THE WAR WILL DEPEND TO A cREATEXTENT ON THEIR ABILITY TO BLUNT OR WEAKEN THEENENYtS ATTACK. THIS IS WHY SOVIET DOCTRINE ALSOEMPHASIZES PRE-EMPTIVE ATTACKS AS WELL AS THEIMPORTANCE OF ANTI-AIRCRAFT AND ANTI-MISSILE D.DESPITE THE PRESENT INADEQUACIES OF SOVIET CIVILDEFENSE AND THE GROING DESTRUCTIVE NESS OF MODERNWEAPONS, THE SOVIET LEADERSHIP BELIEVES THAT THEPRESERVATION OF THE SOVIET STATE AND SOCIETY INTHE EVENT OF A 6AR MERITS CONSIDERABLE EFFORTS ANDTHE EXPENDITURE OF RELATIVELY SCARCt. MONEY ANDRESOURCES. IN THE AI'THON'S OPINION, THE AVAILABLEEVIDENCE LEAVES NO DOUBT THAT THE SOVIET UNION ISENGAGED IN AN EXTENSIVE CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM ANDTHAT IT BE LIEVES IT TO BE nORTH FURTHER EFFORTS ANDCON TINUED INVESTMENTS*
(U)
8
LJNCLASSIFIE.) /ZM.ML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Noo /ZMML7
L A--4O8 967
DUNLAP AND ASSOCIATLS INC DARIEN CONN
TESTING CIVIL DtFENSE PLANS AND OPERATIONS AT THE
FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS* (U)
S-DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL kEpT*
MAY 63 121PA CONTRACT: OCU 0S2 60
UNCLA5SIFIED REPOkT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEtiSq TESTS),
(#RAUIOACTIVL FALLOUT, RADIATION MONITORS),
RADIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION, RAOIATION MEASURE mENT
SYSTEMSt DAMAGE, ANALYSIS, TEST METHODS,
SHELTERS, RAL1IOOGICAL DOSAGE, ERRORS, NUCLEAR
WARFARE, NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS, FOOD, *ATLR SUP
PLIES, SANITARY eNGINEERINGt VENTILATION,
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS* (U)
IDENTIFIERS# 1963, DAMAGE ASSESSMENT,MUSTERIN•s (U)
THE FINAL RLPORT FOR CONiTRACT NO. OCD-0S-62-
60 IS ORGANIZED INTO THREE CHAPTERS. CHAPTER IIS uEVOTED TO A BRIEF DISCUSSIONr OF THE OVER-ALL
PROBLEM STUDIED DURING TH:S CONTRACT. CHAPTER II-PRESENT. DESCRIPTIONS OF THL THREE TESTS OEVEL OPED
DURING THE sTUDY, I.E.. A MUSTERING PLAh TEST* A
= |DAMAGE ASSESSMENT TEST, AND A RADIATION ANALYSISTEST. THE FINAL CHAPTER PRESENTS THL FORMULATION
OF A SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF THE CIVIL DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION DEbIGNED TO IDLNTIFY AND QUANTIFY THOSE
FUNCTIONS WITH 4HICH CIVIL DEFENSL SHOULD BE
CONCERNED, AND THUS TO PROVIDE A BETTER BASIS FOk
TESTING OF PLANS. (AUTHOR) (U)
9
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEV
DOC XEPOkT 8BILIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No, iZ"ML7
RANU CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
CIVIL DEFENSE RtVISITED. (U)
JUN 63 9PtLiAMSJ.D.;REPT, NO, P2751
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS,ANALYSIS).
(U)IOENTIFIERS: 1943. (U)
UISCUSSION ON CIVIL VEFENSE AND COMMiNTS 0., ITs PROGRAMS*
10
UNC;.ASSFIEjo /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-41U SlbAMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH pITTSBUR4M PA
REQUIREMENTS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVIN6 LOCAL CIVILDEFENSE TRAININU# (U)
JUL 63 55P WILLISOMePAUL ;MARKOAITZ,EILEEN I¶oNAGIN,EDYTHE Fel
REP(* NO* AIN C92 6 63TR
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; (eC,VIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS# TRAINING),19TRAIN7NGo CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS), COSTS.A"ALYSIS. PERSONNEL, JOB ANALYSIS, RADIOACTIVEFALLOUTo "ONITORSe (U)
IDENTIFIERS: JOB HIENARACHY, 1963o (U)
REQUIREMENTS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING OCAL CIVIL DEFENSETRAINING*
UNCLASSIF|Eo /ZMML7
I4
UNCLASSIFIED
ODC REPORT BIBlIOgrAPHy SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AO-$25 618OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE WASMINGTON D C
SUMMARY OF STUDIES OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TO*ARD ANDINFORMATION ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE. (U)
AU6 63 3 3 P GARRETTRALPH L. IREPT, NO* RROMONITOR: OCD RRS
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTL;
DESCRIPTOkS: (*ATTITUDES* CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEM%)#(*PUBLIC OPINION. CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTLMS), ANALYSIS,SmELTERS, FEASIBILITY bTIoDIES9 RADIATION HAZARDS (U)IUENTIFIERS: 19643 PUBLIC SUPPORT* PUBLIC ATTITUGES,OBJECTiVES
(U)
12
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEu
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO: /ZMML7
AD-26b 43U
AMERICAN MUi4ICIPAL ASbOC1ATION MASHINqaTON D C
ORGANIZING MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS FOR CIVIL uEFENSE,
OCT 63 IIOSP 8ULLISANDREf S. I*ZLLIAMS,
LAwRENCL A. I
CONTRACT: OC9OS& 293
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (eCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, GOVERNMENT
PROCUREMENT), (*uRBAN AREAS, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),
OPERATION, SOCIAL SCIENCE, SMELTERS. POPULATION.SURVIVAL, SOCIAL COMMUNICATIONs UR&AN AREAS (U)
IDENTIFIERS: COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION. 1963 (U)
THE STUDY DESCRIBES THE CvVIL DEFLNbERESPONSIBILITIES OF MUNICIPAL GOVLRNMENT AS DEFINED
BY PRESENT FEDERAL PROGRAMS AND POLICIES, ESPECIALLY
AS THEY RELATE TO THE FALLOUT SMELTER PROGRAM, SIX
CITIES ARE THEN ANALYZED TO DETERMINE THE MANNER INWHICH COMMUNITY RESOURCES HAVE iEEN ORGANIZED TO MEET
THESE RESPONSIBILI TIES. THE CITIES *ERE SELECTEDTO REPRESENT THE SEVERAL COMMON FOAMS OF CITY
GOVERNMENT AND TO PROVIDE A WIDE GEOGRAPHIC
DISTRIBUTION AND SPECTRUM OF POPULATION SIZES FROMTHE VERY SMALL CITY TO THE LARGE METROPOLITAN CITY.
EACH CASE STUDY PROfIOES A PROFILE OF THE CITY TO
ESTABLISH ITS ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND IDENTIFY
ANY EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MAY BE PECULIAR TO
THE CITY ANU AFFECT ITS CIVIL DEFENSE CAPABILITIES.THE PREPARATIONS MAOE BY THE CITY FOR GOVERNMENT
OPERATIONS IN THE EVENT OF NUCLEAR OR NATURALDISASTER ARE INVESTIGATED, INCLUDIN6 CONTINUITY OF
GOVERNMENT, EMERGENCY POWERS# AND THE CIVIL DEFENSEAGENCY, ITS FINANCING, PROGRAII AND FACILITIES FOR
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS. THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ORSURVIVAL PLANS OF EACH CITY ARE RELATED TO THEASSIGNMENT OF ITS REGULAR DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES TO
EMERGENCY DISASTER FUNCTIONS. THE UTILIZATION MADEOF vOLUNTEERS AND NON-GOVERNMLNTAL AGENCIES,
ORGANIZATIONS, AND INSTITUTIONS TO AUGMENT ANO
SUPPLEMENT CITY FORCES IS DESCRIBL.D (AUTHOR) tU)
13
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No# /ZIML7
AD-426 925PLANNING RESEARCH CORP LOS ANGELES CALIF
CIVIL DEFENSE IMPLICATIONS OF CURkENT AND FuTuREURBAN CUNFIQURATIUNS,
DEC 63 3143P MOLTmANHoRoiGUODRUvECs|REPT. NOD Rq4u9CONTRACT: OCO uS62 278
UNCLASSIFIED REPOmT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS, URBAN
AREAS), POPULATIiNt GRO4TH, VULNERABILITY,
DENSITY, BUILDINGS. (U)
IDENTIFIERS: 19631 LIVIN6 pATTERN, (U)
THIS REPORT EXAMINES THE POSSIBILITIES OF VULNERABILITY REDUCTION THROUGH LONG-TeRM CHANGES IN
URBAN FORM AND sTRUCTURE, 'A THE LIGHT OF PROJECTED
TRENDS IN ECONOIC AND SOCIAL FORCES AFFECTING FUTUREURBAN DEVELOPME.wTs URiAN oECEN TRALIZATION IS
LIKELY TO CONTINUE IN THE FUTURE, AND TECHNOLOGICAL
CHANGE MAY PERMIT DELIBLRA72ACCELERATION OF THISTREND TOWARD SPRAALING URBAN REGIONS* VARIOUS
CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL URSAN FORMS ARE REOUCIBLE TO
A FEW BASIC TYPES9 THE VULNERABILITYCmARACTtRISTICS OF THE DIFFERENT FOHMS ARE MIXED# BUTTHE GALAXY AND vISPERSED SHEET FORMS ARE GENERALLY
BEST SUITED To CIVIL DEFENSE PURPOSES. THESE ARESIMILAR TO THE FORMS THAT FUTURE URBAN REGIONS ARE
EXPECTEU TO TAKer A VARIANT OF THE DISPERSED SHEETFORM IS CON SIDERED THE MOST ADVANTAGEOUS; IT *OULDPROVIDE COMPACT URBAN COMMUNITIES, SEPARATEu pY
EXTENSIVE OPEN SPACES DEVOTED TO NONURBAN LAND USES*WITHIN FUTURE METROPOLITAN AREAS. IN ADDITION.
EFFORTS TO INCREASE THE 'HARDNESSo OF URBANSTRUCTURES ARE DESIRABLLe AN INCREASED PROPORTIONOF HIGH MARuNESS STRUCTURAL TYPES SHOULD oE
ENCOURAGED IN THE BUILDING MIX. THIS INCREASESHOULD TAKE THE FORM MAINLY OF HjuH-HARDNESSRESIDENTIAL STRUCTUNES DISPERSED SINGLY OR IN
CLUSTERS THROuGhOUT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. INOIRECTMETHODS ARE CONSIDERED BY WHICH PROGRESS TOWARD THESE
OBJECTIVES MIGHT oE ASSISTED THROUGH VARIOUS ON GOING
FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES.
(AUTHOR) CU)
14
UNCLASSIFIED /Z"ML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIUGQAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No# /ZMML7
Aj-'43 735RESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C
ANALYSIS OF SURvEY )ATAq (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NuTE: FINAL REPT., PT. 2s
FEB 64 SSiP HILL*E. Le |GROGAN,*o K. ILYDAYoRo Us |NORMENTH, G,
REPT, NO. R OUBIPT. 2
CONTRACT: OCU OS2 144
UNCLASSIFIED REPOkT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS; (*CuMPUTERSO PROGRAMMIN44 (COMPUTERS)),(*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS6 STRUCTURAL PARTS), INPUT-OUTPUT
DEVI.ESt SHELTERS. TABLES, BUILDINGS, CONSTRUCTIONt
ERRORS, SHIELDING, FLOORS, RCJOFS, RADIATION HAZARDS,*ATER, STRUCTURES, DUSAGE (U)
IDENTIFIERS: 1964 (U)
THESE APPENUICES CONTAIN DETAILS OF COMPUTERPROGRAMS USED IN CATEGORIZATION OF STRUCTURES WITHRESPECT TO TECH%!CAL SHIELDING CHARACTERISTICq AND
RESULTA•iT TABULATIONS (A-E)l DETAILS OF THE RTI33 NFS5 PHASE I BUILDIN4 SAMPLE SELECTION METHOD(F); AN ILLUSTRATION OF PROCEVURES USED IN
IDENTIFYING BUILDING ELEMENTS CRITICAL TO PFCOMPUTATIONS (G); RTI COMPUTATIONAL METHOD ANnFORMS USED IN MAKING EN6INEERING MANUAL PF
CALCULATIUNS FOR THE 33 SAMPLL BUILDINGS (H)lDESCRIPTIONS OF THE 33 BUILDINGS, THE FIVE PFRESULTS (AE PHASE I AND 2. RTI FOSDIC WITH ANDWITHOUT PARTITIONS, AND ENGINEERING MANUAL),AND ANALYSES OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDING INPUT ANDPROCEDURAL DIFFERENCES JUDGED TO HAVE AFFECTED THEPF DIFFERENCES (I)l CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF FOURBUILDINGS USED IN COMPARING EXPERIMENTAL ANDCALCULATED PFvS (J); TRAPPED POTABLE WATER FIELDDATA GATHERED IN THE 33 BUILDING SURVEY (K);DETAILED ANALYS0S OF TECHNICAL OPERATIONSRESEARCH REPORTS THAT AFFECT TEN PROCEDURES USED TOCALCULATE PFS (L-N); A SUMMARY OF CGC'CLUSIONE
AND RECOMmENDATIONS MADE BY TECHNICAL OPERATIONSRESEARCH ANU CONCuRlEu 6ITH SY RTI )0 11 ANDDETAILED RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS TO TtoE NBS.NFSSCOMPUTER PROGRAm (P)o (AUTMOR) (U)
15
UNCLASSiFIEU /ZhMLl
UNCLASSIFIEU
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZMML7
AD-',39 6'1dCORNELL UNIV ITHACA N Y
TME USE OF VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIUNS IN CIVILIANDEFENSE AND PREpAREONLSS, (U)
MAR 64 28P uEANsLolS N,"CONTRACT: OCO OS62 72
-UNCLASSIFIED NEPORT
SUPPLLMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS; (oCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PREPARATION),(eGROUP UYNAMICS, CIVIL UEFENSE SYSTEMS), BEHAVIOR,LEADERSHIP, SOCIAL COMMUNICATIONs COSTS, ATTITuDES,SHELTERS, URaAN AREAS, SOCIAL SCIENCES, ECONOMICS,PUBLIC OPINION (U)
IDENTIFIERS: VoLuNTEERS, VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS (U)
16
UNCLASSIFI&Eu IZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-450 22aSTANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
ANALYSIS OF POSTATTACK FOOD PROCESSING ANDDISTRIBUTION& (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: PROGKESS REPT,,JUN 64 IzoP BILLHEIMERJOHN we IDIxONs
HARVEY LeCONTRACT: OCU 0S62 135
PROJ: SRI IMU4O02
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE;
DLSCRIPTORS; (*FOOD UISPENSING, NUCLEAR WARFARE),RADIOACTIVE FALLIUTs FOOD, CONTAMINATION, STORAGEoPROCESSING, UISTRIBUTION, MILK, WHEAT, CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS, FOOD POISONING, ANALYSIS (U)
THIS REPORT DESCRIBES THE INITIAL PHASES OF ASTUDY DESIGNED TO MODEL THE EFFECTS OF THE FOODPROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OF THE UNITEDSTATES ON THE PoSTATTACK FLOW OF CONTAMINATEDFOODSTUFFS, A MODEL.ING METHOD IS PROPOSED THATEMPtOYS UTILIZATION CHARTS, SEASONAL SUPPLY GRAPHS#AND VARIOUS PRODUCTION CONSUMPTION TIME LAGS TCPROVIDE A QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION OF COMMODITY FLO*PATTERN!) THESE QUANTITATIVE INDICES ARE tSSIGNEDPOSTATTACK VALUES THROUGH THE USE OF DAMAGEASSESSMENT PROCEDURES DESIGNED TO FIT EXISTINa FOODINVENTORY DATA@ THE TECHN!QUaS PROPOSED IN THISREPORT ARE USED TO DESCRIBE THE PROBABLE PROCESSINGAND DISTRISUTIOri PATTERNS FOLLOWED BY MILK AND *WHEAT
- - PRODUCTS AFTER A MIAED COuNTERFORCE AND CITY ATTACK
BASED ON A HIGH THREAT LEVEL* (AUTHOR) (U)
J 17
UNCLASSIFIEu /ZMMI.7
I_
O RUNCLASSIFIEDOo1 REPORT BIBIOGRAPE ¢•ARCH CONTROL NOe /ZMNL7
AU-451 013IOWA AGRICULTURAL AND HOME ECONiOmCS EXPERIMENT STATIONAMES
COPMUNITY POWER STRUCTURE AND CIVIL DEFENSE, (U)
DESCRIPt!VE NOTE: FINAL REpT.,64 254P bOH.ENgJOE Me ;SEALiGEoR4EMe ;KLONGLANGERALD E*ITAITJOHN L,
REPT* NO* SR35CONTRACT: OCD OS62 IbOPROJ: IAHESlb29T ASK: 48110
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPrORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS# 50CIULCGY•,(*CIVIL PERSONNEL$ DECISION MAKING), LEADeRSHIP, SOCIALSCIENCES, PUBLIC RELATIONS, SOCIAL COMMUNICATION,EFFECTIVENESS, PERFORMANCE :CNbiNEERING)j SHELTERS,RADIOACTIVE FALL, URBAN AREAS, RURAL AREAS (U)IDENTIFIERS: 19614 (U)
THIS REPORT I5 CONCERNED wITH THE DISTRIBUTION OFSOCIAL POWER ANJ ITS POSSIBLE EFFECTS UPON IHEIMPLEMENTATION oF CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS, THEGENERAL OBJECTIVES OF THIs REPORT ARE (1) TODEFINE CONCEPTS WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO UNDERSTANDINGTHE COMMUNITY DCISION-MAKING PROCE5S (2) TOPRESENT AN ANALYTICAL MODEL OR FRAMEWORK WHICH ALOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR COULD usE IN ANALYZINGSOCIAL POOER# (3) TO OPERATIONALIZE THE FRAMEWORKIN ONE COMMUNITy, AND (q) TO DETERMINE THE CIVILDEFENSE KNOOLEDGE, SENTIMENTS, SOURCES OF INFORMATIONAND ACTIONS OF COMMUNITY INFLUENTIALS, THZSPECIFIC OBJECTIVES ARE (1) To DELINEATE THEPERSONS PERCEIVED TO BE COMMUNITY INFLUENTIALS ANDWHO AFFECT THE OECIS:ON-MAKING PROCESSES OF THECOMMUNIs, (2) TO DETERMINE THE PERSONAL ANDSOCIAL CNARA-CTERISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY INFLUENTIALSs(3) TO DETERMINt THE EXTENT TO WHICH THERE I5 ASTRUCTURE IN Tmi INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONGCOMMUNITY INFLUENTIALS, (q) TO DETERMINE THEEXTENT TO WHICH TH1E COMMUNITY INFLUENTIALS AREPERCEIVED TO HAvE SOCIAL POWER IN DIFFERENT ISSUEAREAS. (AUTHOR) IU)
18
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AD-1451 079IOWA ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION AMES
SOCIAL ACTION IN Ci,/LL DEFENSE. THE STRATEGY oFPUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN A COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSEEDUCATIUNAL PROtRAM. (U)
DLSCRIPTIvE NUTE: FINAL SUMMARY REPT.,
64 7•P BEALGEORGE Me IYARBROuGH,PAUL ;KLONGLANGERALD Es|BOHLENJCE M. I
REPT. NO. RURAL SOCIOLOGY-34CONTRACT: OCU OS62 isoPROJ: 1529
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTt=
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, GROUP DYNAMICS),HUMANS, PUBLIC OPINION, PERFORMANCE (HUMAN), SOCIALCOMMUNICATION, SOCIOLOGY, DECISION MAKING, FEASIBILITYSTUDIES, PUBLIC HE4ATIONS, EDUCATION CU)
IUENTIFIERS; 1964 (U)
THE PURPOSE OF THE REPONT WAS TO FOCUS ON ONEASPECT OF SOCIAL ACTION AND CIVIL DEFENSE: THEINITIATION AND EXECUTION OF LARGE-GROUP SOCIAL ACTIONAMONG INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS. SPECIFICOBJECTIVES OF TmE REPORT hERE (l) TO PRESENT ACONbTRUCT OF THE SOCIAL ACTION PROCESS WHICH CAN BEUSEU AS A DESIGN• FOr IMPLEMENTING SOCIAL ACTIONPROGRAMS AND/OR AS A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING EXISTINGOR PAST SOCIAL ACTION PROGRAMS, (2) TO PRESENT AN
ANALYSIS OF A SOCIAL ACTION PROGRAM INVOLVING CIVILDEFENbE, (A) TO PRESENT A DESCRIPTIVE BACKGROUNDOF THE CIVIL DEFENSE SOCIAL ACTION PROGRAM ANALYZED.(B) TO ANALYZE IN DEPTH THIS SOCIAL ACTIONPROGRAM UTILIZING THE SOCIAL ACTION MODEL, AND
DEVELOPING METHODOLOGmY To OPERATIONALIZE THE SOCIALACTION CONSTRUCT FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES, AND (1)TO DISCUSS THE FINDING OF THE STUDY AND TO EXPLORETHE IMPLICATIOris OF THESE FINDINGS IN THE ATTEMPTS OFTHE OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE TO INSTIGATE OTHERSOCIAL ACTION PROGRAMS. (AUTHOR) (U)
19
SUNCLASSIFIEo /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-60U 438MICHIGAiq STATL uI'IV EAST LANSING COLL OF CUMMuNICATIO.N
ART$
THE FALLOUT PROTECTION bOOKLET: (111) AMETHODOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF PRE-JEST RESPONSES OFTHOSE WHO RLSPONDED, REFJsED, OR aENE NOT REACHABLEON THE POST-TEST. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPT.,APR 64 23P COSTLEYqUAN ;BERLOoDAVID
K.CONTRACT: OCO 0S62 19
UNCLASSIFIED REPOkT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (#CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ATTITUDES)o(ONUCLEAR *AKFARE)i HANDbOOKS, SHELTERS, PUBLIC OPINION#SURVIVAL, SOCIOMETRICS (U)
A STUDY WAS MADE OF THE IMPACT OF THE 'FALLOUT--PROTECTIONt BOOKLET WHICH ivAS PUBLISHED BY THEOCD IN uECEMBER OF 1961. AHILE COLLECTING DATASPECIFIC TO THAT OBJECTIVE, USEFUL INFORMATIONRELEVANT TO PUBLIC INFORMATION ABOUT AND ATTITUDETOWARD CIVIL DEFENSE hAS cOLLECTED. RLPORT IPRESENTED DATA jjN THE ACCURACY OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGEABOWT NUCLEAR ATTACK AND cIVIL. DEFEdS•. THEFAVURABILITY OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOhARD CIVIL DEFENSEMEASURES, OTHER ESTIMATES OF THE PUBLIC AS TO (HETHRLAT OF NUCLEAR *AR AND THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESSOF VARIOUS SHELTER INDUCEMENTS AND INDUCEMENT AGENTS,AND INDICES OF pUBLIC EXPOSURE TO SHELTERINFORMATION, REPORT I ALSO ANALYZED ATTITUDINALAND DEMOGRAPHIC CORRELATES OF SHELTER KNOfiLEDGEsBELIEFS, ANv PLANS* REPORT 2 PRESENTED DATAFROM A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ATTITUDINAL ANDINFORMATION LEVELS OF RESPONDENTS wHO HAD BEEN
DIVIDED INTO FOUR CATEGORIES OF INTEREST AITH RESPECTTO CONSTRUCTING FAMILY SHELTERS. THiS REPORTPRESENTS THE FINDINGS OF A COMPARISON OF PRE-TEST
RESPONSES OF THuSE AHO (A) RESPONOso (B)REFUSED, OR (C) *ERE NOT REACHABLE UN THE POST-TEST. (SEE ALSO AD-404 512)0 (AUTHOR) (U)
20
UNCLASSIFIEE /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY 5EAHCH CONTROL Nos /ZMML7
Au-60U 751COLUMbIA UNIV NL* YURK BUREAU OF DPrLiLD SOCIALRESEARCH
THE AMEHICAN PUbLIC AND THE FALLOUT-SHELTER ISSUE (ANINE-COMMUwTY SURVEY). VOL. 1I. THE STUDY DESIGNAND THE STUDY COMMUNITIES, (U)
OCT 63 91P LEvINEGENL N. IMODELL.JOHN
.ONTRACT: OCO OS62 71
U~NCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLLMENTARY NOTLU
DESCRIPTOmS; (*PUBLIC OPINION, SHELTERS), (*CIVIL
DEFENSE SYSTEMS, FPBLIC OPINION), (*SHELTERS. PUBLICOPINION), UNITED STATES, SOCIOmETRICS, RADIOACTIVEFALLOUT, PSYCHOMeTRICS, SELECTION (U)
THE REPORT CONTAINS THE DETAILS OF THE STUDY oESIGNAND DESCRIPTIONS UF THE NINE COMMUNITIES IN WHICHINTERVIEWS wERE COLLECTED, ATTENTION IS GIVEN ToTHE WAYS IN WHICH THE STUDY COMMUNITIES *LRE qELECTEDAND THE BASIC QUEST!C,INAIRE DEVISED@ (SEE ALSnAD-OO0 75Z) (AUTHUR) (U)
21
UNCLASSIFIEu /ZMML7
UNCLASS FIEF
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Noe /ZMML7
AU-bOU 752COLUMBIA LNIV NLO YORK bUREAU OF APPLIED SOCIALRESEARCH
THE AMERICAN PUbLIC AND THE FALLOUT-SHELTLR ISSUE (ANINE-COMMUNITY SURVEY), VOL* Is A SUMMARY OFMETmOOS, FINDIN6 S, AND IMPLICATIONS. (U)
MAY 64 3'qP LEvINEGENE Me ;MODELL.JOHN
CuNTRACT: OCO oS 6 2 71
UNCLASSIFIED 1ýEPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE;
DESCRIPTORS: {*PUbLIC OPINION, SHELTER!), (*CIVILDEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLIC OPINION)* (oSHELTERS, PUBLICOPINION)* UNITED STATES, SoCIOmETRICS, RADIOACTIVEFALLOUT, EMOTIONS, FLAR, PSYCHOMETRICS %Uj
A PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY WAS MADE ON THE PUBLIC'SREACTIONS TO THE COLD *AR, AND ESPECIALLY TOTHROW LIGHT ON THEIR OPINIONS AND ACTIONS ON THE
-FALLOUT-SHELTER ISSUf# (AUTHOR) (U)
22
UNCLASSIFIEL /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
Au-600 985MIC|IGAN STATE uNIV EAST LANSING COLL OF COMMUNICATION
ARTS
CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS: IV) CHANGE IN BELIEFSoPART A.
DESCRIPTIVE NOTEI COMMUNICATIONS 4CICANCM fEPT.SEP 63 6uP MACLEANtMALCOLM So ,JRs;
DANbURY#THOMAS ITALdOTTALl[iT D*IENGBRETSONIROBERT 0, 1
CONTRACT; OCO OS62 19
UNCLASIIFIkq REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*ATTITUDES, CIVIL DEFENSE 5Y$TEMt),(*SHELTERS, PUBLIC OPINICN)p RADIOaCTIVE FALLOUT.APPLIED PSYCHOLOY. PERSONALITY (U)
A DESCRIPTION A,4D TABULAR SUMMARY ARE GIVEN OF THECHANGES IN MAJOR TYPES OF BELIEF PATTERNS ABOUTFALLOUT SHELTERS, RADIATION, PEACE. AND UEFENSEo ASUMMARY IS INCLUDED OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEENBELIEF PATTERN CHANGES AND VARIOUs INDICES INCLUDINGCIVIL DEFENSE INFORMATION AkiD MEDIA EXPOSURE,FALLOUT PROTECTIOI€ BULLETIN READERSHIP, ANDGENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS* (AUTHOR)
(U)
IU
23
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEu
DOC REPORT BIBL|OGXAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AD-60U YB9MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING COLL OF COMMUNICATIONANTS
CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS: (VI) CHANGE INBELIEFS, PANT 8, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPT,NOV 63 69P MACLEANMALCOLM So tjR.I
DANBURYTHOmAS gTALdOTT.ALBERT Do3ENGBRETSONsROBERT 0. 1
CONTRACT: OC& Os 62 19
UNCLASSIFIED REPOkT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTL:
DESCRIPTORS: (*ALTITUDES. CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),(OSHELTERS, ATTITUDES), PERSONALITY* PUBLIC OPINION,
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, STABILITY (U)
•HE REPORT CONTAINS FIVE MAJOR PARTS *ITH AN
ACCOMPANYING APPENDIX FOR EACH PANT: (L)CHANGES IN THE RANKINGS OF THE FALLOUT SHELTERSTATEMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE DEMOGRAPHICAND GENERAL INFORMATION EXPOSURE INDICESI (2)CORRELATES OF STABILITY OF INDIVIDUAL BELIEFPATTERNS; (3) ChANGLS IN THE BELIEF PATTERNS OFTHE FOUU FALLOUT SHLLTER AND RADIATION TYPESt (q)CHAN•GES IN OELIEF PATTERNS OF THE FIVL PEACE ANDDEFENSE TYPES; AND (51 BOOKLET READERSHIP. (U)
24
UNCLASSIFIED iZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CUNTROL No. /ZMML7
Ao-600 990MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING COLL OF COMMuNICAT:ONARTS
CIVIL OLFENSE BLLIEF PATTERNS: (IV) TOPICAPPEALS. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NUTE: COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPT.SEP 63 42P MAcLEANsMALCOLM So *JR.1
DANBURYTHOMAS :TALdOTTALBLRT 0o ;bERNSTEINsNEIL R. ;
CONTRACT: (CQ OS 62-19
UNCLA:SIFIED REPo.TI SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*ATTITUDES, CIVIL DEFENSt SY$TEMH)o(ATTITUDLS, rERSONALITY), PUBLIC OPINIUN, APPLIED
PSYCHOLOGY, SHELTERS (U)
A DESCRIPTION AND TABULAR SUMMARY ARE GIVEN Or THEFIVE MAJOk TYPES OF PERSONS ON THE OASIS OF THEIR
PATTERNS OF INTEREST IN CIVIL DEFENSE INFORMATIONTOPICS* (U)
25
UNCLASS|FIEa /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEDDDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Noe /ZMML7
AD-600 991MICHIGAN STATE UNIV CAST LANSIhN COLL OF COMMuNICATIONARTS
CIVIL DEFENSE BLLIEF PATTERNS; (VII) SUMMARY# (U)
OESCRIPTIvE NOTE: COMPUNICATION RESEARCH REPT.MAR 6q ZIP MACLEANMALCOLM Se t JRO IDANBURY ,THOMAS ;TALBOTTOALBENT D. I
CONTRACT: OSuOS 60 2 I
UNCLASSIFIED REPOkT
SUPPLEMENTARY NoTc:
DESCRIPTORS: (oATTITuDES, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)*(oSHELTERS# A'rITUDES)3 PERSONALITY, PUBLIC OPINIONoAPPLIED PSYCMOLOGY. HADIOACTIVE FALLOUT IU)
A GENERAL AND OVERALL SUMMARY IS PRLSLNTEO OF THEPROGRAM OF RESEARCH ON CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS.
(U)
26
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEDDEC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-600 993MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING COLL OF COMMuNICATIONARTS
CIVIL DEFENSE BtLIEF PATTERNS; (I) PEACE ANDDEFENSE. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPT.APR 63 641P MACLEANoMALCOLM So *JRs|
DANBURYoTHOMAS 8TALdOTTALBERT Do ICONTRACT: OCO OS62 19
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DLSCRIPTORS: (*ATTITUDES, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),(eCIVIL UEFENSE SYSTEMSo PUBLIC OPINION), FACTORANALYSIS, PERSONALITY, APPLIED PSYCHOLOiYo SHELTERS,RADIOACTIVE FALLUUT (U)
A DESCRIPTION AND TABULAR SUMMARY ARE GIVEN OF THEFIVE MAJOR TYPES OF PERSONS ON THE BASIS OF THEIRPATTERNS OF BELIEF ABOUT PEACE AND DEFENSE* (U)
27
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEo
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
AO-601 Oil
PITTSBURGH UNIV PA
THE NEAR SYSTEM: A STUDY IN PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE. tU)
FEB 64 ZO'P NEHNEVAJSAJIRI ICONTRACT: OCD OS3 48
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
S5PPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (OPuBLIC OPINION, CIVIL DEFENSE SySTEMS),(*CIVIL DEFENSE sYSTEMSs PUBLIC OPINION). 4DEARLYWARNING SYSTEMS, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS), ATTITUDES,AARNING SYSTEMS, COSTS, COLD WAR, UNITED STATES tU)
IDENTIFIERS: NEAR SYSTEM (U)
THE NEAR SYSTEM STUDY *AS CONDLiCTED IN LATE 1963AND EARLY IN 1964 IN A SAMPLE OF I,'U2 AMERICANSINTERVIEWED ON bEHALF OF THE UNIVLRSITY OFPITTSBURGH BY NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCHCENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ChICAuO, THESTUDY REVEALED nIGH RECEPTIVITY To THE IOLA OF A HOMEALERTIN6 SYSTEM, AND TO THE SPECIFIC NEAR RECEIVERTESTED, AMERICANS CLAIMED THAT THEY WOULD BELIKELY TO ACQUIRE SUCH A DEVICE# DIFFERENCES AMONGVARIOUS POPULAItON SUBGROUPS WERE ONLY SUBTLE. ANDNONE RAN IN ENTIRELY OPPOSING ODRECTIONS* IN FACT*THE ACTUAL NEAR RECEIVER, ONCE SHORNo GENERATED AMORE FAVORABLE mE!PONS! THAN DIo THE CONCEPT OF AHOME ALERTING SYSTEM AS SUCH. (AUTHOR) (U)
28
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT 0IBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NOo /ZMML7
AD-601 014MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING COLL OF COMMUNICATION
ARTS
CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS; 4I1) SOURCECREUIBILITY9 (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NUTE: COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPTeAPR .3 SIP MACLEANjMALCaLM So ,JR*j
DANBURYTHOMAS jTALbOTT.ALBkRT Ue ICONTRACT: OCO OS62 19
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*ATTITUDES, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)o
(OATTITUDES, SOURCES), (*SHELTERS, ATT.TUDES)o(*RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT, ATTITUOES), PUBLIC OPINION,PERSONALITY, NUCLEAR PARTICLES, APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY*
CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL (U)
INFORMATION IS GIVEN FROM INTERVIEWS ON BELIEF
PATTERNS CONCERNING DESCRIPTION AND TA&ULAR SUMMARY
ARE GIVEN OF THE FIVE MAJOR TYPES OF PERSONS ON THEBASIS OF THEIR PATTERNS O TRUST AND DISTRUST
ACCORDED SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT FALLOUTSHELTERS AND RADIATION. (U)
29
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No@ /ZMML7
Au-601 214APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES WAYNE PA
STANDARUIZEL TESTING FOR THE OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSERADIOLOGICAL MONITORING FOR INSTRUCTORS COURSE, (U)
'JUN 64 87P SIEGELsARTHUR le JSCHULTZt
DOUGLAS Ge IFEDERMANPHILIP ICONTRACT: OCO 0S62 178
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS; (ePLRFORMANCE TESTS, CIVIL DEFENSEPERSONNEL), (OTEsT CONSTNUCTION (PSYCHOLOGY).INSTRUCTURS). (O:NSTRUCTORS9 CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL)#RADIATION MONITOkSt PSYCHOMETRICS (U)
THE DEVELOPMENTAL STEPS FOLLOWED IN CONSTRUCTINGSTANDARDIZED TESTS FOR GRADUATES uF THE OFFICEDEFENSE RADIOLOGICAL MONI!ORING FORINSTRUCTORS COURSES ARE DISCUSSED* THE COMPLETETEST BATTERY CONSISTS OF A MULTIPLE CHOICE. PAPER-ANDPENCIL TEST COVERING CONTENT AREAS CONSIDEREDIMPORTANT BY KNOWLEDGEABLE OFFICE OF CIVILDEFENSE AND ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSIONPERSONNEL AND T*O PERFORMANCE EXAMINATIONS wHICH TESTRADIOACTIVE SOURCE HANDLING AND SURVEY INSTRUMENTEMPLOYMENT SKILLo THREE EQUIVALENT, ALTERNATIVEFORMS OF THE *RITTEN TEST ARE DESCRIBED* ITEMANALYTIC AND RELIABILITY DATA, ALONG *ITH PRELIMINARYNORMATIVE MATERIALSs ARE PRESENTED FOR THE WRITTENTESTS. THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEPERFORMANCE EXAMINATIONS ARE ALSO DETAILED. A TESTADMINISTRATORoS MANUALt FOR BOTH THE *RITTEN TESTS
= AND THE PERFORM4 NCE EXAMINATIONS, IS INCLUDED AS ANAPPENDIX* (AUTHOR) (U)
30
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Noi /ZMML7
AD-601 467HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO FULLERTON CALIF
OCD SOFT TARGET STUDy. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.APR 69 Z13P
REPT* NO. FR-46'14-66
CONTRACT: OCO 0562 277
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS. EFFECTIVENESS),SHELTERS, NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE, NUCLEAR *ARFARE
CASUALTIES, RADIATION EFFECTS, COSTS. PROGRAMING(cuMPUTERS), COMPUTERS (U)
THIS REPORT DESCRIBES METHODOLOGY AND ORIGINALCOMPUTER PROGRAMS WHICH HAVE BEEN DEVELOPLD TO ASSIST
IN THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THF STUDY OBJECTIVE. TwO
COMPUTER PROGRAMS ARE EMPHASIZED* THE DYNAMICANALYZER PROGRAM CALCULATES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
SPECIFIED SHELTER SYSTEMS IN PROTECTING THEPOPULATION FROM PARTICULAR ATTACKS. POPULATIONMOBILITY AND FALLOUT FIELDS WHICH DEPEND ON BOTH TIME
AND POSITION ARE CONSIDERED. THE WEIGHTED-STRATEGy, MULTIPLE SHELTER TYPE MIX ANDLOCATION OPTIMIZER COMPUTES THE OPTIMALEFFECTIVENESS VERSUS COST CURVE OVER THE RANGE FROMZERO COST TO THE COST OF THE MOST EFFECTIVE SYSTEMPOSSIbLE WITH A GIVEN SHELTER CATALOG. THISPROGRAM ALSO DETERMINES THE MIX AND DEPLOYMENT OFSHELTERS AT DESIRED COST/EFFECTIVENESS LEVELS,SOFT TARGET STUDY ACTIVITY HAS SHOWN THAT THEREIS A DIFFERENCE IN THE INTENSITY AND RELATIVEINTENSITY OF THE DIFFERENT WEAPON EFFECTS FOR CITIESNEAR SOFT AND HARD TARGETS. HO*EVER, ALL *EAPoNEFFECTS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED FOR BOTH CASES. THESIGNIFICANCE OF THIS FACT IS THAT THE PROCEDURESDEVELOPED UNDER THE SOFT TARGET STUDY MAY BEAPPLIED TO THE STUDY OF CIVIL DEFENSECOUNTERMEASURES FOR CITIES IN ANY TARGETINGSITUATION. (AUTHOR) (U)
31
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
AD-601 930APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES hAYNE PA
CIVIL DEFENSE COURSE DEVELOPMENT TECHN!QUES*INSTRUCTORIS GUIDE FOR A COURSE IN STATE LEVE1 CIVILDEFENSE STAFF OPERATIONS* (U)
JUN 64 152P FLETCHEROOROTHY E, ;SIEGEL*ARTHUR i1
CONTRACT: OCO 0S 6 2 121
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS, TRAINING)# CIVILDEFE-4SE PERSONNEL, CIVILIAN PERSONNELt INSTRUCTORS,CONTROL, SHELTERS, DEFENSE SYSTEMS, TRANSPORTATION,COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, WARNING SYSTEMS9 FEASIBILITYSTUDIES (U)
AN INSTRUCTURtS GUIDE FOR A CUURSE IN STATE LEVELCIVIL DEFENSE STAFF OPERATIONS IS PRESENTED. THEGUIDE REPRESENTs AN ADJUNCT TO ACTUAL COURSEMATERIALS OLVELOPED SEPARATELY, THE TOTAL RESULTCONsTITUTES THE END PRODUCTS EMERGING FROM AFEASIBILITY STUDY INTO TECHNI(UES FOR DEVELOPINGCIVIL DEFENSE COURSES* (AUTHOR) (U)
32
UNCLASSIFIED /ZliML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /'ZMML7
AD-601 931APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES WAYNE PA
CIVIL DEFENSE COURSE DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES. A COURSE
IN STATE LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE STAFF OPERATIONS, (U)
JUN 64 364P FLETCHER*DOROTHY Ee 5IjSiELs
ARTHUR Il I
CONTRACT: OCD OS62 121
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSt TRAINING), CIVIL
DEFENSE PERSONNEL, CIVILIAN PERSONNELo INSTRUCTORS*
CONTROL, SHELTERS, DEFENSE SYSTEMS, TRANSPORTATION,
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, WARNING SYSTEMS, FEASIBILITY
STUDIES (U)
THE RESULTS OF LOEVELOPING FOR CIVIL DEFENSE A
COURSE BASED ON TECHNIQUES CUSTOMARILY EMPLOYED IN'
DEVELUPING cOURSES FOR WEAPON SYSTEMIS HARDOARE
DEVELOPMENT ARE PRESENTED, THE RESULTS ARE
PRESENTED IN THL FORM OF A COURSE IN STATE LEVEL
CIVIL DEFENSE STAFF OPEfATIONSo PRELIMINARY TEST
OF THE MATERIALS SUGGESTS THAT A VITAL, NEEDED COURSE
WAS OBTAINED ANu THATo AT LEAST FOR THE SuBjECT
MATTER AREA INVSTIGATED, THE TECHNIQUE IS
APPROPRIATE. (AUTHOR) (U)
33
UNCLASSIFiED iZMML7
-•_ - -z _• • • '• • : - -•
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Nog /ZMML7
AD-602 8'9
HUDSON INST INC HARMON-ON-HUDSON N Y
COLLATERAL UAMAGEo (U1
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REpT.,JUN 64 13eP KRUPKAROBLRT Ao I
REPT. NO. 361-RR/5
CONTRACT: OCD OS63 !22TASK: '1413D
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (ONUCLEAR WARFARE CASUALTIESo CIVILIAN
PERSONNEL), (*POPULATION, NUCLLAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE)s(oSHELTERS, COSTS)# BLAST$ AERIAL TARGETS, CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS, URBAN AREASo TABLES# MATHEMATILAL ANALYSIS.
MILITARY FACILITIES (U)
THE PAPER PRESErNTS THE METHODOLOGY AND RESULTs OF ALIMITED STUDY UNDERTAKEN TO DETERMINE COLLATERALPOPULATION DAMAiE FROM 6EAPONS AIMED AT STRATEGIC
MILITARY BASES AND TO ROUGHLY ESTIMATE lHE COST OFBLAST SHELTLRS TO PNOTECT EVERYONE AT RISK. FOURSETS OF CALCULATIONS ARL GIVEN. THE FIRST
(APPENDIX A, LAbELED tROUGH COMPUTATIONS')CONTAINS A UETAILED LISTING OF BASES AND CITIES ATRISK, PLUS MORTALITIES COMPUTED USING CENSUS DATA,
TARGET TO CITY DISTANCES, AND THE DAMAGE MODEL
SELECTED. THE SECOND (APPENDIX B, LABELED.DETAIL CALCULATIONS FOR TEN TARGETSt)
CONTAINS THE RESULTS OF REFINED CALCULATIONS FOR SOMELARGE CITIES IN #HICH EACH CENSUS TRACT IS TREATED ASA POPULATION CEN4TERo THE THIRD (APPENDIX CeLABELED 'ADJUSTED COMPUTATIONSt) cONTAINS THERESULTS OF MODIFYING THE FIRST SET OF COMPUTATIONSACCORDING TO THE RESULTS OF THE REFINED COMPUTATIONS.THE FOURTH (APPENDIX 0. LABELED 18LASTSHELTER COST CO•jPUTATIONSt) CONTAINS BLAST
SHELTER COST CALCULATIONS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST I-MT AND 8-MT ATTACKS, (AUTHOR) (U)
34
UNCLASSIFIEo /ZtiM!,7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REFORT BIBLIOGRAPHY' SEARCH CONTROL NHO /ZMML7
AU-6O0 274PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE WASHINGTON D C DIV OF HEALTHMOBILIZATION
THE ROLE OF THE DENTIST IN NATIONAL DISASTER, (U)
JUL 6q 21PCONTRACT: OCD OS&3 65TASK: 2$ZID
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NoTe: PREPARED IN COOPERATION *ITH THECOUNCIL ON FEDERAL DENTAL SERVICES OF THE AMERICANDENTAL ASSOCIATIuN.
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFLNSEs DENTAL PERSONNEL)$(*DENTISTRY, CIVIL DEFENSE), (*DENTAL PERSONNEL, CIVIL
DEFENSE), NUCLEAR WAR CASUALTIES, PUBLIC HEALTH,TRAINING PRO•aRAMSv EDUCATION, LEADERSHIP, UIAGNOSIS,MEDICAL eXAMINATION, THERAPY, SURGERY lUj
7HERE ARE THREE BASIC AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY INWHICH THE DENTIST CAN SERVE MOST EFFECTIVELY: (A)CIVIC OR COMMUNITY: (8) ADMINISTRATIVE: AND(C) PROFESSIONAL* THESE AREAS CAN BE CAPABLY
SERVED BY THE DENTIST W!THOUT RESORT TO EATRADISCIPLINARY TRAINING. EXTRA DISCIPLINARYFUNCTIONS THAT BECOME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THEDENTIST CAN BE ATTAINED THROUGH THE INSTITUTION OFTRAINING PROGRAMS UNDER THE COMBINED AEGIS OF THE
MEDICAL AND DENTAL PROFESSIONS, ONLY THE TOTAL
HEALTH TEAM APPROACH CAN EFFECTIVELY COPE WITH THEPROBLEMS CREATED BY A NATIONAL DISASTER* THE
EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF DENTAL AUXILIARY PERSONNELITHE DENTAL HYGIrNISTt DENTAL ASSISTANT AND DENTAL
LABORATORY TECh NICIAN IS RECOGNIZED AS A NECESSARYADDITION TO TA• %tOTAL HEALTH TEAM. THE RECOMMENDEDAPPROACH TO PRCPARE THE DENTIST AND DENTALAUXILIARIES FOR NEN AND EXPANDED FUNCTIONS INPROVIDING EMERGENCY CARE IN NATIONAL DISASTER IS
THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DISASTER PREPARFDNESSPRINCIPLES INTO EXISTING DENTAL CURRICULUMS.(AUTHORi (U)
35
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
iODC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NOs /ZMML7
AD-604 275PUBLIC HEALTH SLRVICE WASHINGTON D C DIV OF HEALTHMOBILIZATION
THE ROLE OF THE PHARMACIST IN NATIONAL DISASTER, IU)
JUL 64 3!PCONTRACT: OCU 0S63 65TASK: 2i21D
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE; PREPARED IN COOPERATION *ITH THEAMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION'S COMMITTEE ON
UISASTER AND NATIONAL SECURITY*
DESCRIPTORS; (OPHARMACOLOGY, CIVIL DEFENSE), (*CIVILDEFENSE, MEDICAL PERSONNEL), (*MEDICAL PERSONNEL, CIVILDEFENSE), EDUCATION, TRAINING PROGRAMS, MEDICALSUPPLIES, DRUGS, DOSAGE, STORAGE, MEDICAL EXAMINATION,THERAPY, PUBLIC HEALTH, SURVIVAL, COMMUNICABLE DISEASEStRADIATION EFFECTs, DECONTAMINATION (U)
IDENTIFIERS: PHARMACIST (U)
THE ROLE OF THE PHARMACiST IN DISASTER PREPAREONESSWAS RECORDED, SETTING FORTH PRIORITIES ON PHARMACISTSIN DIFFERENT TYPES OF PRACTICEo RECOMMENDATIONSFOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REPORT INCLUDE THE CREATIUNOF AN AWARENESS OF THE PROBLEMS BY ALL PHARMACISTS,THE MOTIVATION UF PHARMACISTS TO BETTER EWUIPTHEMSELVES FOR ASSUMING RESPONSIBILITIES IN DTSASTERPROGRAMS, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SUITABLEEDUCATIONAL OR TRAINING MECHANISMS TO ACHIEVE THESERESULTS* TO DO THIS, CLOSER COORDINATION wITHFEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IS URGED, MOREUSE BY PHARMACISTS OF THE TRAINING MATERIALS OF THEMEDICAL SELF-HELP PRORAM, AND AN EVALUATION OFBETTER UTILIZATION OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL RESOURCES OFTHE COMMUNITY IN SHELTER PROGRAMS, SPECIFICALLY,THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED: (1) THEESTABLISHMENT Of JOINT COUNCILS OF HEALTH PROFESSIONSFOR DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, (2) THE DEVELOPMENT,PUBLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF A BASIC ORIENTkTIONMANUAL FOR PHARMACISTS, (3) THE ESTABLISHMENT OFA PHARMACY LIAISON OFFICER FOR CIVIL DEFENSE, (U)
36
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No, /ZMML7
Au-606 69Ut RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
THE SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM, (U)
MAR 62 2#4P GOURELEONREPT. NO* P255'4
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE; THIS 4ECTURE WAS PREPARED rOR
PRESENTATION AT THE NATIONAL MEETING OF THE AMERICANCHEMICAL SOCIETY. DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL ANDENGINEERING CHEMISTRY IN WASHINGTON, Do C. 27 MAR62.
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS* USSR)o (*USSR,CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS), GOVERNMENT (FOREIGN). SHELTERS,POPULATION, TRAINING, PROPAGANDA, SYMPOSIA (U)
SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE IS THE SUBJECT OF PUBLIC
DISCUSSION IN THE UNITED STATES WITH A GREAT nEALOF CONFLICTING INFORMATION BEING PUBLISHED ABOUT IT,
FOLLOING THE LATE PRESIDENT KENNEDY'SANNOUNCEMENT OF PLANS TO ACCELERATE AND EXPAND THEUNITED >TATES CIVIL DEFENSE AND SHELTERCONSTTRUCTIUN PROGRAM, THE SOVIET UNION HAS DONEITS BEST TO CAST DOUBTS ON THE VALUE OF THE U. s.
EFFORT AS WELL AS TO DENY THE EXISTENCE OF A SIMILARCIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM IN THE SOVIET UNION. (U)
37
UNCLASSIFIED /ZtML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT B161IQGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NU. /ZMML7
AU-6d09 094= PITTSdURGh UNIV PA
LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, (U)
OCT 64 '49P ANDERSONMARTHA WILLIS ICONTRACT: OC•j OSb3 q8
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SJPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL, STATISTICALDATA), ("SOCIOLO(Y, CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL), COLD *ARIATTITUDES, POPULATIOro PUBLIC OPINION, UNITEV STATES,GEUGRAPHY, URBAN AREAS, SOCIAL SCIENCES (U)
AN INVESTIGATIOI, *AS CONDUCTED INTO THE EXTENT ANDCOMPOSITIUN OF SUPPORT FOR THE CIVIL DEFENSEPROGRAM FROM WOki&O MAR II TO 1963. THEREPORT IS ONE OF A SERIES OF PAPERS BASED ON OATAFROM A UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH NATIONAL STUDYENTITLED THE COLD WAR AND CIVIL DEFENSE
-ATTITUDES* CONDUCTED DURING THE YEAR 1963 WITH ASAMPLE OF 1,434. THE FOCUS *AS A SET OF THREEQUESTION•S AdOUT CIVIL DEFENSE ACTIVITY: 1)HAD THE RESPONDENT OR ANY MEMBER OF HIS FAMILy EVERBEEN ACTIVE IN CIVIL DEFENSe. 2) OHENe AND 3)WHAT DID THEY Do* RESPONSES TO THESL QUESTIONSWERE RUN AGAINST RELEVANT PERSONAL DATA IN ORDER TOATTEMPT TO DETERMINE THL NUMBER AND COMPOSITION OFTHE GROUP *MICH HAD PEEN ACTIvE. IT BECAMEIMMEDIATELY APPARENT THAT 1496 PERCENT OF OURRESPONDENTS, OR 196 PEOPLE, HAD BEEN ACTIVE INCIVIL DEFENSE AT ANY TIME, AND FURTHER THAT THEMAJORITY OF THESE PEOPLE HAD dEEN ACTIVE DURING THESECOND *ORLO WAR AND MAO PARTICIPATED MOSTOFTEN IN TERMS OF CARRYING OUT ASSIGNED ROLES. THEGROUP SLEN AS ACTIVE AT THE TIME OF INTERVIEW ISANALYZED SINGLY. IN TERMS OF THE PERSONAL DATA*(AUTHOR) (U)
38
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIL,.IOGRAPHy SEARCH CONTROL NO# /ZMML7
AU-609 096PITTSBURGH UNIV PA
COLD *AN ANU CIvIL DEFENSE ATTITUDES: THEDESIRABILITY OF ALTERNATE MODES OF ORGANILING A CIVILDEFENSE EFFORT, (U]
OCT 6' 2oP COLEMAN#ALAN No ICONTRACT: OCO 0563 48
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENrARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS; (OCULD OARs ATTITUDES), 40CIVIL DrFENSESYSTEMS, PUBLIC OPINION), COSOCIOLOGY9 CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS), UNITED STATES, STATISTICAL DATA# POPULATION.URBAN AREAS# RURAL AREAS. SOCIAL SCIENCES lU)
A NATIONAL SAMPLE OF 1,13q RESPONDENTS WAS ASKED TOASSESS THE DESIRABILITY OF EACH OF FIVE DIFFERENTWAYS OF ORGANIZING A CIVIL DEFENSE PRUGRAM: (1)ONE CARRIED OUT MOSTLY BY VOLUNTEERSI (2) APRCGRAM UNDER STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS1 (3) ANEAR-MILITARY ORGANIZATION, SIMILAR TO THL NATIONALGUARD; (4) A PROGRAM UNDER ONE OF THE PRESENTARMED SERVICES) (5) A NEWS SEPARATE SERVICE ALONGTHE LINES OF THE PRESENT ARMED FORCES* INASSESSING THE NATURE OF THE SOCIAL SITUATION PROMWHICH OPINIONS ON THE ABOvEmMENTIONED ALTERNATIVESWERE GENERATED, IT WAS FOUND, ON THE ONE HAND, THATALL OF THE PROGRAMS WERE GENERALLY MORE DESIRABLE TORESPONDENTS IN THE LOOER SOCIOECONOMIC POSITInNS INTHE SOCIETY (IN TERMS OF INCOME# EDUCATION ANDOCCUPATION) AND THAT CATHOLIC RESPONDENTS FOUNDALL OF THE ALTERNATIVES MORE UES!HABLE THAN 010PROTESTANTS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STATE-LOCALPROGRAM, AHERE BOTH GROUPS FOUND IT EQUALLYFAVORABLE. 3N TmE OTHER HAND, DIFFERENCES INSOCIAL FACTORS 4ERE REFLECTED IN THE FINDINGS THATNON'METROPOLITAN AREAS OF RESIDENCE FOUND THEVOLUNTARY AND STATE-LOCAL ALTERNATIVES MORE DFSIRABLETHAN DIO METROPULITAN AxEAS| THAT THE VOLUNTARYPROGRAM *AS FAVORED EQUALLY BY REpUBLICANS ANDDEMOCRATS BUT TmE STATE-LOCAL *AS DESIRED MORE BYREPUBLICANS, AL L. OTHER ALTERNATIVES BEING FAVOREDMORL by DEMUCRATS THAN REPUBLICANS. (AUTHOR)
(U)
39
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
o TI
T
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CUNTROL Noe /ZMML7
AU-609 10i
PITTSdURGH UNIV PA
SUML PUbLIC VIE,,S 0o, CIVIL OEFLNSL PROGRAMS8, (U)
DEC 6' l1izP NEHNEVASbAJIRI ;BROuI,DOROTHY Vo ;KROCHMALUONNA;POMEROyoNICHARD I
CUNTRACT: OCU 0563 4d
TASK: s8128
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NoTt:
DESCRIPTORS: (OCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLIC OPINION),(OPUBLIC OPINION, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS), SOcIOLOGY,SHELTERS, COSTS, ATTITUDES, POPULATION, UNITED STATES,STATISTICAL OATA, SAMPLING. ABSTRACTING (U)
THESE FOUR REPOnTS ARE bASED ON A SURVEY OF CIVILDEFENSE AND CULD 4AN ATTITUDES CONDUCTED INMID-19639 INTERVIE*S WERE CONDUCTED *ITm A NATIONALPROdABILITY SAMPLE OF 1,t43 AMERICANS. EACHREPORT TAKES AS A TOPIC A KEY ASPECT OF THE 5AMPLE'SORIENTATION TO CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND COLD RAN
ISSUES AND ANALYZES IT IN TERMS OF RELEVANT SOCIALAND PERSONAL CHARACTEKISTICS. INTERVIEO SCHEDULES*ERE AOMINISTERLO IN• THL SUMMER OF 196. AND DEALTWITr THE LIKELIHOOD AND DESIRABILITY OF VARIOUSALT-RNATIVE SHELTER SYSTEMS AND COLO •AR UUTCOMES.IN ADDITION TO THE DATA COLLECTED ON ATTITUDES ANDOPINIONS ON THE CENTRAL ISSUES RESPONDENTS *ERE ASKEDA SERIES OF QUESTIONS SPECIFYING PERTINENT ELEMENTSOF THEIR SOCIAL AND PERSONAL ATTRIBUTESp THESEDEALT *ITH SUCH TOPICS AS MARITAL STATUS, FAMILYINCOME, EDUCATION, AGE, ETC*# AND A VARIETY OF OTHERQUESTIONS TAPPItNG THESE DIMENSIONS. (U)
4 G
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMPIL7
LJIUNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No# /ZMML7
Ag-611 160FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTnN D C
DAMAGE TO CONVENqTIO.AAL AND SPLCIAL TYPES OFRESIDENCES EXPOsED TO NUCLEAR EFFECTS. (U)
DLSCRIPTIvE NOTE: REPT. FOR FEB-MAY StAPR 61 BIP xANDALL.PHILIP As I
PROJ: 31 1MONITuR: WT , 1191
UNCLAbSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTC: REPT. ON OPERATION TEAPOT. RESEARCHDONE IN COOPERATIO.4 ,dITH THE FEDERAL HOUSINGADMINISTRATION, .tASHINGTON, Do Cat AND THE HOURINGAND HOME FINANCE AGENCY, WASHINGTON, Do C.
DESCRIPTORS: (OHOUSING, NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE),(*NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE, HOUSING), (*CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEHS, HOUSING), BUILDINGS, *OOD, aRICK, REINFORCEDCONCRETE, STkUCTURAL PROPERTIESo VULNERABILITY. NUCLEAREXPLOSIONS, LIVIL ENbINELRINGt PHOTO4RAPHS (U)IDENTIFIERS: TEAPOT OPERATION lU)
AT THE NEVADA TEST SITE Or THE ATUMICENERGY COMMISSION, 10 RESIDLNTIAL sTRUCTURES AEREEXPOSED TO THE eXPLOSION OF A NUCLEAR DEVICE (APPLEI1) OF APPROXIMATELY JO-KT YIELD, DETONATED ATOP A500-FT TOnER, To TEST THEIR BEHAVIOR AND RESISTANCETO NUCLEAR REAPONS EFFECTS AND TO OBTAIN DATA THATWILL. CONTRIOUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROvEnPROTECTIVE OESIbNS. FROM A DETERMINATION OF THEBEHAVIOR OF THESE STRUCTURES UNDER BLAST, THERMAL,AND NUCLEAR RADIATION EFFECTS, IT SHOULD BE PoSS1ILETO DETERMINE THE BEST STEPS TO BE TAKEN FOR THEPmOTECTION OF FAMILIES LIVING IN SUCH STRUCTURES ANDTO OBTAIN NLCESSARY ADDITIONAL DATA ON THE STRENGTHSOF THE STRUCTURES AS A *HOLE ^ND POSSIBLE WEAKNESSESIN COMPONLNT PARTS. THE PROJECT WAS CONCERNEDPRIMARILY WITH BLAST AND RADIATION EFFECTS ONRESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES, AND PRECAUTIONS WERE TAKEN TO
AVOID IGNITION OF THE STRUCTURES BY THE THERMALENERGY OF THE EAPLOSION, DATA OBTAINED AREExPECTEJ TO BE uSEFUL ALSO IN THE DEVELOPMENT OFMETHODS FOR STReNGTHENING THE STRUCTURES WITHINLIMITS uF PRACTICAL ECONOMY, ANO IN PROVIDINGINFORMATION ON THE POSSIBLE USE OF THE STRUCTURES FORHOUSING *|TmOUT MAJUR REPAIRS FOLLONING A NUCLEAR
E4ENT, iv)
41
UNCLASSIFIEO /ZD•L7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-611 43dRESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C
A THESAURUS OF CIVIL DEFENSE UESCRIPTORSo CIVILDEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REpTt APP, Et VOL. 2. I DEC63-15 JAN 6b,
JAN 65 22uP mERZOGR. To IJENKINSJ, Es IREPT, NO, OU158.1TASK: 4631
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLeMENTARY NOTL:
DESCRIPTORS; (*INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, CIVIL DEFENSEbYbTEHS)o febUBJECT INDEXING, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),(*CIVJL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, DOCUMENTATION), INDEXES,VOCA8ULARYo CLASSIFICATION, INSTRUCTION MANUALS,LANGUAGE# LIaRARIES, RECORDS, REPORTS, ANALYSIS (U)
IDENTIFIERS: DESCRIPTORS, THESAURI, CODING(DOCJMENTATIuN)
(U)
A LISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 60U *ORDS OR PHRAS, 4(DEbCRIPTORb) IS PROVIDED FOR USE IN INDEXING ANDRETRIEVIN6 CIVIL PEFENSL RESEARCH INFORMATION.INCLUSION NOTES, 'USE.' AND IALSO SEE9REFLRENCES ARE PROVIDED AS nELL AS 4ENERAL DIRECTIONSFOR APPLYINU DEsCRIPTOrS Tq CIVIL DEFENSEINFORMATION* THE DESCRIPTOD SELECTION 4AS MODELEDON THE SYSTEM OF THE DEFENSE DOCUMENTATIONCENTER (DOC)* AmOUT 70 OF THE 60C DESCRIPTORSARE NOT USED BY DOC* THEY WERE CHOSEN FROM THECIVIL DEFENSE MATRIX AND FROM SPECIAL FIELDS OFINTEREST. THIS CORE OF 600 GENERAL OESCRIPTORs CANBE SUPPLEMENTED *lTH SPECIFIC TERMS IN THE SUBJECTAREAS *HERE THE WUANTITJ OF DUCUMENIS *ARRANTS MOREINTENSIVE INDEXING* FROM PREVIOUS LIBRARYEXPERIENCE (Pa*166 qNsj, IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE600 DESCRIPTORS CHOSEN ARE THE MINIMUM NUMBER NEEDEDFOR A COLLECTION OF 1000 DOCUMENTS, (AUTHOR) (U)
42
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NOs /ZMML7
AD-611 764DUNLAP AND ASSOCIATES INC DARIEN CONN
REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL PLANN:NG TO COVER HAZARDS OFFALLOUT. VOLUME Is IU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REpTo, VOLe ItJAN 65 63P
REPT, NO, DRU-64-I1O VOL* 1CONTRACT: OCo OS63 161TASK: 1531A
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, EFFECTIVENESS)*(oSHELTERS# MANAwEMENT PLANNING)o POPULATION.DISTRIBUTION$ TRAFFIC, PASSENGER VENICLES, FIRES. FIRESAFETY, HAZARDS, RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT* LINEARPROGRAMMING, CONi.ECTICUT (U)
THE STUDY CONCEfiTRATEL) UPON DEVELOPINfa EFFECTIVEPLANS FUR ASSIGNING SHELTERS TO POPULATION, AND FORBRINGINb THL POPULATION TO THE SHELTER. T*OMEDIUM-SIZEU TO..NS IN CCNNECTICUT, STAMFORD AND*ATERdURYv AERE STUDIED IN DETAIL. FOR EACHTOWN, A STUDY WAS MADE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANUMBER OF PLANS OF VARYING DETAIL AND COMPLEXITY INGETTING PEOPLE TO SHELTER. IN ALL PLANS IT "ASASSUMED ThAT ENOUGH TRAFFIC CONTROL hOULD BE SET UPTO AVOID •LOCKAGES OF TRAFFIC NEAR SHELTERS, AND THATTHE POPULATI'N i.OULD KNOW TO AHAT SHELTER AREAS THEYHAD BEEN ASSISNED, AND HOe THLY WERE SUPPOSED TO GETTHERE. TWO TYPES VF SHELTER ASSIGNMENT WERE MADE:
THE FIRST *AS By CENSUS TRACT, THE SECOND BYINDIVIDUAL LOCATION, IN THE FIRST, PEOPLE FROM
SHELTER-POOR CEt4SUS TRACTS *ERE DIRECTED TO SHELTER-RICH CENSUS TRACTS, ACCORDING TO A LINEAR PROGRAMMINGMETHOD AIMED AT MINIMIZING OISTANCE TRAVELED. INTHE SECOND, A SIMILAR METHOD QAS uSED TC ASSIaNPEOPLE TO ACTUAL BUILDINGS. STUDIES wERE MADE OFVARIOUS SPEEDS OF MOVEMENT TO SHELTER AND THEIREFFECTS UPON RATE AT OHICH THE POPULATION WASSHELTERED. PLANNING PRObLEMS ASSOCIATED WITHPRIMARY AND SECONDARY F:RES WERE 1IVEN CURSORYEXAMINATIONe .U)
43
UNCLASSIFIED lZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-612 299RESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C
CIVIL DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS (AFEASIBILITY STUDY OF RESEARCH INFORMATIONEXCHANGE). (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NuTE: FINAL fEPT9, VOL. 1, I DEC 43-15 JAN659
JAN 65 '146P HERZOG#*# To [JENKINSJo E9 1RLPT. NO. R-OU-158-1TASK: Q6318
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTL:
DESCRIPTORS: (eCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS. DOCUMENTATION),(*INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)i SUBJECTINDEXING, REPORTS. LIBNARIES. LANGUAGE, VOCABULARY,CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL. ANALYSIS, SOURCES, FEASIBILITYSTUDIES (U)
IDENTIFIERS: INFORMATION SySTEMs, INFORMATION CENTERS,- - INFORMATION EXCHANGE SYSTEM (U)
A FLASIOILITY STUDY WAS PERFORMED OF A CIVILDEFENSE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMTHAT *ILL INSURt THE READY AVAILABILITY OFINFORMATION TO ALL PERTINENT OCU ELEMENTS AND TOCONTRACT RESEARCX PERSONNEL. A dRIEF ANALYSIS OFSCIENTIFIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS IS PRESENTED ASBACKGROUNU FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE PRESENT CIVILDEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM. THE POTENTIAL SOURCESOF CIVIL DEFENSE INFORMATION ARE LISTED. THE CIVILDEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM IS DEFINED TO BE THERELATIONSHIPS ON EXCHANGE BET*EEN THE SOURCES OFCIVIL DEFEN3E INFORMATION AND THE USERS OF THISINFORMATION, METHODS FOR IMPROVING THIS EXCHANGEARE PRESENTED. THESE SUGGESTIONS INCLUDE THEESTABLLLISHMENT OF AN INFORMATION ANALYSIS CENTER#
THE PRINTING OF A QUARTERLY TLCHNICAL PROGRESSREVIEWt AND THE USE OF STANDARD REPORT FORMAT ANDINDEXING PROCEDURES. TO FOSTER STANDARD INDEXtNGPROCEDURES, A 'THESAURUS OF CIVIL DEFENSE•4ESCRIPTORSt IS PROVIDED (AD-611 436)o(AUTHOR) (U)
44
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
/ 7 AD-61Z 706-INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ARLINGTON VA ECONOMIC ANDPOLITICAL STUDIES DIV
FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSE ORGANIZATION: THE RATIONALE OFITS DEVELOPMENT. (U)
JAN 65 jcop ,.ESSERTROBERT As ;JORDAN*NEHEMIAH ;TASHJEANtJOHN t.iR JpT 6 NO, STUDY 5-18O EIDA/HEA65-3480
CONTRACT: OCD-05-63"134
UNCLASSIFIED REPOOT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, MANAGEMENTPLANNING), NATION,.AL DEFENSE, DEFENSE SYSTEMS,COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, SHELTERS, EDUCATION, CIVILDEFENSE PERSONNEL, DECISION MAKING, WARNING SYSTEMS,COSTS, HISTORY (U)
IDENTIFIERS: COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS.URGANIZATION5 (U)
THE PRESENT STU,;Y EXAMINES THE ORGANIZATIONALCONCEPTS 4HICH HAVE EMERGED DUXING THE MODERN HISTCOYOF CIVIL DEFENSE, SINCE THESE HAVE DERIVED LAPGELYFROM POLITYURIENTED APPROACHES, CONCEPTS OF THE ROLEOF CIVIL DEFENSE IN NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY ANDMACHINERY, OF FEDERAL, STATE# AND LOCALRESPONSIBILITIES, AND OF EMERGENCY POWERS ARESTRESSED, THE ISSUES UNDERLYING THESE POLITYPROBLEM$ ARE CONSIDERED UNDER THREE MAIN HEADINGS:THE MISSION AND PURPOSE OF CIVIL DEFENSE, THEOPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FULFILLING THE LIFE-SAVING MISSION, AND THE POLiCY CONSTRAINTS WHICHLIMIT THE RANGE OF FEASIBLE WAYS TO MEETREQUIREMENTS, COST/EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES ARESUGGESTED F)R INITIAL COMPARISONS OF THE ALTERNATIVEORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS FOR SATISFYING REQUIREMENTSFOR PROTECTIVE CAPABILITIEF EMERGENCY SERVICEb,RESOURC. ALLOCATION, AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.BROAD ORGANIZATIONAL PROPOSALS RHICH HAVE BEENRECOMMENDED ARE EXAMINED, AND THE PRINCIPAL REASONSFnR WHICH THEY HAvE BEEN REJECTED ARE INDICATEDo (U)
45
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NOs /ZMML7
AD-613 60O
MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING COLL OF COMMUNICATION
ARTS
ARGUMENTATIVE THEMES IN CIVIL DEFENSE: (1) A CONTENTANALYSIS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: COMMUNICATION RESEARCH RLPT,,JUN 64 75P BETTINGHAUSERWIN Pe 1
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS. PUBLIC OpINION)t(*NEWSPAPERS# CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)s NUCLEAR *ARFAREtSHELTERS, COSTS. HISTORY, POLITICAL SCIENCE, UNITEDSTATES GOVERNMENT, ATTITUDES, SURVIVALo DISARMAMENT (U)
IDENTIFIERS: FALLOUT SHELTERS, NEW YORK TIMES (U)
THE REPORT PROVIDES THE COMMUNICATION RESLARCHER ORTHE PUBLIC AFFAIRS SPECIALIST WITH A CATEGORY SCHEMEFOR DESCRIBING THE MATERIALS TO BE FOUND IN ToE CIVIL
DEFENSE FIELD. IT ALSO PROVIDES AN APPENDIX WHICHATTEMPTS TO RECONCILE TfO DIVERGENT REPORTS ON4 CIVILDEFENSE MATtRIALS, ONE REPORT, ENTITLEDARGUMENTATIVE TmEMES IN CIVIL DEFENSE# ISCOMPARED WITH CIVIL DEFENSE AND SOCIETY BYJERI NEmNEVAJSA AND HIS COLLEAGUES AT THEUNIVERSITY OF PITTSdURGA, THE COMPARISONINDICATES THAT THE TWO REPORTS ARL NOT INCOMPATIBLE.
ALTHOUGH THE CATEGORY SCHEMES USED IN THE T*O SEEMQUITE DIFFEKENT, THE REPORT SUGGESTS THAT THERE ARE
SIXTEEN GENERAL AREAS INTO WHICH CIVIL DEFENSEMATERIALS CAN BE PLACED, THE CATEGORIES ARE ONLY
RELATIVELY INDEPENDENT, BUT CERTAINLY SERVE TODISTINGUISH VARIOUS PfSITIONS IN THE CIVIL DEFENSEDIALOGUE* THE REPORT ALSO OFFERS THE FOLLOWINGTENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THE FREQUENCY OFMATERIALS APPEARING IN THE NEW YORK TIMES FOR
THE PERIOD CITED: (1) THE GREATEST PERCENTAbE(39,'I) OF ALL ARGUMENTS IDENTIFIED REFERRED TOFALLOUT SHELTERS; AND (2) THE LARGEST PERCENTAGEOF ALL STORIES ('4.82) *ERE FOUND TO BE FAVORABLETO OCD POLICIES, AND$ WHEN THE NEUTRAL ARTICLES AREREMOVED FROM CONSIDERATIONs THE PERCENTAGE RISES To
9�9�9•o (U)
46
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEU
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZIML7
AD-613 637HUDSON INST INC HARMON-ON.HUDSON N Y
CHANGING PRUSPECTS, MISSIONS AND ROLES FOR CIVILDEFENSE: 1965-197b. (U)
FEB 65 '47P BROWNIW:LLIAM Me ;CASTILsRAYMOND 0o IKAHNHERMAN ;*IENERANTHONY Je I
REPT. NO* HI'477-RRCONTRACT: OCO 0S62 I1TASK: 2 11A
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, EFFECTIVENESS),COLD WAR, WARNING SYSTEMS, DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ARMSCONTROL, DETERRENCE, STRATEGIC WARFARE# NUCLEAR *ARFAREvSHELTERS, USSR, UNITED STATES (U)
THE MAJOR CONCLuSION FOR CIVIL DEFENSE PLANNING ISTHAT SMALL OR INTHATAR ATTACKS, ARISING OUT OF DEEPCRISES, ARE THE EASIEST AND CHEAPEST TO PREPAREA(A1NST, APPARE,jTLY THE LFAST UNLIKELY, AND YET AMONGTHE MOST NE(2LECTED OF CIVIL DEFENSE CONTINGENCIES.WHILE THE PUSSIBIL!TY OF MASSIVE SURPRISE ATTACKSHOULD NOT bE IGNORED* THE RELATIVE OVEREMPHASIS UPONIT HAS HAMPERED REALISTIC PLANNING EFFORTS. A MOREREALISTIC ALLOCA1:ON OF PLANNING EMPHASES LEADS TOINCREASED INTEREST AN CIVIL DEFENSF AND EMERGENCYPLANNING PROGRAMS CUOITAINING SOME OR ALL OF THEFOLLOnING EL.EMENTS: (1) A CRISIS MOBILIZATIONBASE; (2) A TENSION MOBILIZATION BASE; (3) APOST-ATTACK RECUPERATION BASE; (4) POSSIBLE ARMSCONTROL AND INCREASED DEFENSE AGREEMENTS, INCLUDINGCOOPERATIVE CIVIL DEFENSEl AND (5) PROGRAMS THATVARY PROTzCrION VITH POPULATION DENSITY TO REDUCE THELUCRATIVENESS OF POPULATION TARGETS, STRATEGIC ANDPOLITICAL ASPECTS OF SUCH PROGRAM ELEMENTS AREDISCUSSED, ANUO ON dALANCE, THEY ARE RECOMMENDED.(AUTHOR) (U)
47
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
L
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AO-613 666PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
PERCEIVED EFFECTIVE.4ESS OF AMERICAS DEFENSES. (U)
MAR 65 16dP BRODIEDUROTHY V.
TASK: '8 ZIC
UNCLASSIFIED REPOT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: AVAILABLE COPY WILL NOT PERMIT FULLY
LEGIBLE REPRODUCTION. REPRODUCTION WILL BE MADE IF
REQUESTEO BY USERS OF DDC, COPY IS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC
SALE@
DESCRIPTORS; (vCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLIC OPINION),
EFFECTIVENESs, SHELTERS, NUCLEAR WARFARE, COLD 6AR#*EAPON SYSTEMS, POPULATION. SAMPLING9 WARNING %YSTEMSoCOSTS, SOCIOLOGY, TABLES
THE REPORT EXAMINES LEVELS OF CONFIL)ENCE INAMERICA'S DEFENSE SYSTEM, THE SPECIFIC PROGRAMSWHICH ATTEMPT TO SATISFY THE GOALS OF THE SYSTEM ftERE
CONSIDERED IN THE ANALYSIS. THESE INCLUDED THEPUBLICtS ESTIMATE OF EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIVE ANDPASSIVE DEFENSES, EAAMINATION OF THE CONFIDENCE INPASSIVE DEFLNSES INVOLVED 'HE EVALUATION OFEVACUATION PROGRAMS, SHELTER PROGRAMS PROBLEMS OFWARNING TIME, LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE EFFORTS, COSTEFFECTIVENESS OF THE SYSTEM, AND EVALUAT:ON OF CIVILDEFE.NSE PROGRAMS IN RELATION TO VARIjUS TYPES OF4EAPONS EFFECTS, ALL AVAILABLE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCEON THESE TOPICS, DRAWN FROM THE UiiIVERSITY OFPITTSUNUGHI! DATA BANK, NAS REVIEWED, AN ATTEMPTWAS MADE TO SPECIFY THE TOPICS BY PERTINENT CROSS-TABULATIONS. hHENEVER -LASIBLE, THE SAMPLEPOPULAT!ONS WERE DISCRETELY IDENTIFIED INTO
DEMOGRAPHIC SUB.GROUPS AND OTHER PERTINENTtNDICATORS* THE DATA WAS DRAWN FROM VARIOUSINSTRUMENTS AND VARIOUS SAMPLES. WITHINLIMITATIONS OF THE DATA, A TREND ANALYSISESTABLISHING THE BASIC CHRONOLOGY OF PUBLIC OPINION
ON THE MAJOR ISSUES WAS PROVIDED. (AUTHOR) (U)
48
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
Ao-614 3b6PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
THREAT PERCEPTION AND CIVIL DEFENSE, (U)
MAR 65 2OZP KONTOSDONNA K. I
TASK: 48 21C
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SuPPLEMENTARY NOTE;
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, THREAT
EVALUATIUN)l (*THREAT EVALUATION, PUBLIC OPINION),(*PUBLIC OPINION, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS), SHELTERS,
FEAR, ATTITUDES, CIVILIAN PERSONNEL, EFFECTIVENESS,TARGETS, POPULATION, NUCLEAR WARFARE (U)
THE ANALYSIS OF THE NATION'S PERCEPTION OF THREATINCLUDED ANXIETY ABOUT *ARI THE NATuKE OF THE THREATPERCEIVED, NAMELY: nHAT ARE THE PERCEIVED TARGETSAND WHAT WEAPONS 4ILL BE USED; ESTIMATES OF WEAPONSEFFECTS; THE COiiSEQUENCES OF THREAT PERCEPTION OFVARYIING DEGI'(EES AN•D TYPE FOR ACTIONI AND THECONSEQUENCES OF THREAT PERCEPTION OF VARYING DEGREESAND TYPE ON THE RESPONDENT'S FEELING ABOUT CIVIL
DEFLNSE AND/OR FALLOUT SHELTERSe (U)
49
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEDDOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMAL7
AD-615 72bSNATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES WASHINGTON D C DEPT OF URBAN
STUDIES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL CIVIL DEFENSE ORGANIZATIONS ANDP1RORA M So U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAý. REPT.,APR 65 31UP AILLIAMSLAWRENCE A.
VEILLETTEtPLTER Do IBULLISANDREW So STASK: 41412B
UNCLASSIFIEO REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTt:
DESCRIPTORS; (#CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, URBAN ARvAS)o(*URBAN AREASt CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS), OPERATION.LEADERSHIP, ATTITUDEbs PUBLIC OPINION (U)IDENTIFIERS: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS (U)
PATTERNS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE JURISDICTIONALIMPEDIMENTS TO THE EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE OF LOCALSERVICES ARL DESCRIdED AND RELATED TO CIVIL DEFENSEORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEMS# THE MAJOR ALTERNATIVEAPPROACHES TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURISDICTIONALREORGANIZATION AND THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGESATTRIBUTED TO EACH ARE EXAMINED# THREE INTER-LOCALGOVERNMENT CI;VIL DEFENSE AGENCIES ARE TREATED ON ACASE STUDY bASIS. EMPHASIS IS PLACEL UPON LOC&LGOVERNMENT CIVIL UEFENSL oG'GANIZATION# POWERS, ANDINTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONSHIPS@ ATTENTION ISGIVEN To (1) THE ROLE OF THE STATES, (2)METHODS OF POLICY FURMULATION. (3) ARRANGEMENTSFUR POLITICALLY RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISION# (i)ARRANGEMENTS FOk ESTABLISHING AUTHORITY FOR UNIFIEDAND COORDINATED EMERGENCY OPERATIONS# (5)PROCEDURES FOR ALLOCATING COSTS, AND (6) THEI14CREMENTS IN CIVIL DEFENSE CAPABILITY RESULTjNG FROMAREA-AIDE ORGANIZATIONS, THE VIEWS OF LOCALELECTED OFFICIALS IN EI6HT METROPOLITAN AREASRELATIVE TO CIVIL DEFENSE AND CIVIL DEFENSEORGONIZATIOjNAL PATTERNS ARE ANALYZED, (AUTHOR)
(U)
50
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZMML7
AD-617 734STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
A SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF CIVIL DEFENSE ORGANIZATInN ATTHE REGIONAL* STATE, AND LOCAL LEVELS. INITIALREPORT: SYSTEM uEFINITION AND PROBLEMIDENTIFICATIONs lU)
MAY 65 9bP MCGEEARTHUR A. lKATZ,RICHARD Co .
PROJ: MU4949 410 4536 432TASK: 41411B ,I441C
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, MANAGEMENT
PLANNING), UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENTOF DEFENSE, NATIONAL DEFENSE9 MANAGEMENT CUNTROLSYSTEMS, MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING* WARNING SYSTEMS#SURVIVAL, FOOD, tATER SUPPLIES, COMMUNICATIONSYSTEMS, TRANSPORTATION, MEDICAL PERSONNEL,MEDICAL SUPPLIES, CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL,EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, BANKING, URBAN AREAS (U)
THE REPORT PREStNTS A BROAD ANALYSIS OF THE CIVILDEFENSE SYSTEM AND ORGAlIZAT;ON AT THE REGIONAL,STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT. FROM THISANALYSIS THE STUDY IDENTIFIES MAJOR SYSTEM PROBLEMSWITH ORGANIZATIONAL IMPLICATIONS AND DISCUSSES, BUTDOES NOT QUANTITATIVELY EVALUATE, ALTERNATIVESOLUTIONS TO THESE PROBLEMS. (AUTHOR) (U)
51
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
_77 77 -- _
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
AD-61d 414
lIT RESLARCH INST CHICAGO ILL
FIRE BEHAVIOR, IGNITION To FLASHOVER* (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL SUMMARY REPT.,JUN 65 stBP VOoVARKAF* Jo |*ATERMINsTo
E. ;REPT. NO. N6US9T ASK: ZC 2S.56C
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NeTe:
DESCRIPTORS: (*NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE, FIRES)*(oFIRES, NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMA6E), IGNITION,FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS#SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (U)
IDENTIFIERS: FIRe SPREAD, FIRE STORMS VELAUNIFORM PROJLCT (U)
THE PPOGRAM STUoIED FIRL BUILDUP RESULTING FROMFLAMIN5 IGNITIONS OF MAJOR FURNITURE ITEMS INSIMULATED RESIDENTIAL ROOMS. TIMES *ENE DETERMINEDFOR FIRLS TU DEVELOP BEYOND ELEMENTARY EXTINGUISHMENTTECHNIQUES AND FOR FLASHOVER TO OCCUR# THE DATAPROVIDE INFORMATION FOR DETERMINING PERSONNELREQUIREMENTS FOR CIVIL DEFENSE FIRE FIGHTING TEAMSAND BRI6ADESe IN ROOMS AITH CONVENTIONALUPHOLSTERY, IN ROOMS *ITH FOAM RUBBER UPHOLSTERY, ANDIN BEDROOMS WITH BOA SPRINGS, 9J PEa .ENT OF THE FUELDEVELOPED BEYONU SELF-HELP EXTINGUISHMENTCAPABILITIES IN 26, B AND 12 MINUTES, RESPECTIVELY*BEDROOMS *ITH OPEN SPRINGS DID NOT FLASH OVER.(AUTHOR) IU)
52
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
F UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMHM7
Ao-619 6A7
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES PAYNE PA
MAS5 TRASNIqG TECHNIQUES IN CIVIL DEFENSE* It. AFURTHER STUDY OF TELEPHONIC ADJUNCT TRA|NINGs (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOYE: TECHNICAL REPT.,JUL 45 7aP SIEGELARTHURI IFISC.Ls
MYRON A.
LNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE;
DESCRIPTORS; (eCiVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS, TRAINING),(*APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY$ CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),TRAINING DEVICES, TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION 5YSTEM5sTEACHING MACAINES, POPULATION* CiVIL DEFENSEPERSONNEL, PERFOnMANCE(HUMAN)i LEARNING*MEASUREMENTj STATISTICAL TESTS, STATISTICALANALYSIS (u)IDENTIFIExS: PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION (U)
THE GAIN IN KNOkLEDGE ACCR6dNG THROUGH USE OfTELEPM3OIC ADJUNCT TRAINING WAS INVESTIGATEu &MONGiNDIVIDUALS OF LIMITED FORMAL EDUCATION. THERESULTS INDICATED THAT BOTH ADJUNCT AUGmENTEDTELEPHONIC TRAINING AND ADJUNCT AUGMENTED REAnINGWERE MORE EFFECTIVE THAN EITHER READING ORUNAUGMENTED TELEPHONIC TRAINING FUR PRESENTING ATTACKSURVIVAL MATERIAL TO THIS SAMPLE OF SUBJECTS. THETAO PRIOR STUDIES IN THE PROGRAM ARE REVIEy1ED. ANDTHE IMPLICATIONS OF THE OVERALL PROQRAM'S RESULTS FORPUBLIC EDUCATION IN CIVIL DEFENSE ARE OISCUSSED*(AUTHOR) jut
53
UNCLASSIFIED /hL
UNCLASSIFIED
ODC REPORT B!BLIOGkAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
AV-62U 268PUBLIC HEALTH SLRVICE WASHINGTON p C VIV OF HEALTH
HOBILIZATION
ORIENTATION MANUAL ON DISASTER PREPAREDNESS FOR
PHARMACISTS* lU)
DLSCRIPTIVE NuTE. FINAL REpT,AUG 65 3 3 P
CONTRACTS OCO-PS-63-6SPROJ: OCO-22'4 DTAS4: Z4'2D
U14CLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: PREPARED IN COOPERATION *lTH THE
AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION'S COMMITTEE UNDISASTER AND NATIONAL SECURITY, AAS•INGTON# uO C.
NDSCRLPTORSA (EDISASTERS. mEDICAL PERSONNEL),HAMEOACAL PEISONAIELO DISASTERS', (ECIVRL DEFENYE
PERSONNEL, MIDACAL PERSONNEL)# PHARMACOLOGYNPROFESSIONAL PERSONNTER CIVAN DEFENSE SYSTEESTCASUALTIES, SHELTERS, MEDICAL SUPPLIESs DRUGS$
STURAGEt DISTRABUTIINN COMMUNICABLE DISEASESTPUBLIC HEALTO MEDICAL LABORATORHES, X RAYSVNUCLEAR *ARFARE CASUALTHES, UNITED STATESGOVERNMENT (U)
THE MANUAL IS BASED ON ITUE ROLE uF THEPHARMACIST ON NRTIONAL S ISASTERto PREPARED dYTTHE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATIONISCOMMITTEE ON DISASTER AND NATIONAL SECURITYIN COOPERATION .ITH THE DIVISION OF HEALTh
MODSALZATEOPt PuALIC HEALTH SEAVOCE RDEPARTMIeNT ZoF HEALTHo E0JCATI0!:9 AN6` 4ZLFAREeIT FURTHER SERVES A$ A GUIDE FOR THE PHARMACXqT INHIS AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR QtSASTtR PREPAREDNESSoTMIS INCLUDLS AN EXPLANATION OF EXISTINGGOVERNMENTA6 ANO NON-GOVERNMENTAL PROQRAMS CONCERNINGDISASTER PREPAREDNESS SERVICES AND OFFERS DIRECTION
FOR MOTIVATING PHARMACISTS TOAARDS COMMUNITYPREPAREDNESS. APPROPRIATE REFERENCE SOURCES ARE
LISTED, (AUT;IOR) lU)
54
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AU-622 096HUDSON INST INC HARMON.ON.HUD$ON N Y
A NEW LOOK AT THE DESIGN OF LOW-BUDGET CIVIL DEFENSE
SYSTEMS. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: RESEARCH REPT.,AUG 65 '42P BROWNeSILLIAM He I
RLPT. NO# HI-T47.RRTASK: .2118
UNCLA$SIFIED NEPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTL:
DESCRIPTORS; (@CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS# URBAN AREAS)*E E3I1Nt VULNERABILITY, SMELTERS, NUCLEAR WARFARE,
NUCLEAR NARFARE CASUALTIES, AARNINA SYSTEMSe
,1ADIOACTIVE FALLOUf, POPuLATION, SURVIVAL,uETERRENCEe COUNTERMEASURES, BUD6ETS9 CObTS,
EFFECTIVENESS (U)
THE FEASIVbILITY OF DESIGNING hIGHLY EFFECTIVE LOW-
COST CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS IS EXAMINED INRELATIONSHIP TO VARIOUS WAR OUTBREAK SCENARIOQ AND
THE UTILITY OF THE ASSOCIATED PREATTACK WARNINGPERIOD. IT IS AkGUED THAT WITH MOOERATE CONFIDENCESUCH HI"HLY EFFECTIVE SYSTEMS CAN BE DESIGNED.
THEY WOULD UEPEND UPON A GENERAL MOBILIZATION OFCIVILIAN RESOURCES DURING AN EMERGENCY TO GREATLY
EXPAND AND IMPROVE ANY EXISTING C. Do CAPABILITY,IDEALLY SUCH DESIGNS CAN VISUALIZE ATTAININQ THEGOAL OF ZERO CAbUALTIESI mOWEVER, A DYNAMIC PLAN
WOULD CONTAIN SEVERAL OPTIONS TO HANDLE THE MANY
IMPERFECTIOtS WHICH WOULD ALMOST CERTAINLY APPEARDURING IMPLEMENTATION* THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OFTHE C. Dg DESIGNS ARE EXAMINED SEPARATELY FORTECHNICAL, POLITICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND STRATEGICFEASIB:LITY. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT THIS APPROACHOFFERS SUBSTANTIAL PROMISE FOR FUTURE C. Do
DEVELOPMENTS. (AUTHOR) fU)
F
55
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
-I
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AO-bZZ U99PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
THE 196q CIVIL DEFENSE POSTURES: PUBLIC RESPONSE,(U)
AUG 65 97P ANOERSONMARTHA NILLIS I
CONTRACT: UCU 0563 '4
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLICOPINION)z COLD WAR* SHELTERS, 6UDGETS. FEDERALBUDGETS, URBAN AmEAS9 SURVIVAL, ATTITUDES,PROBABILITY, CORmELATION TECHNIwUES,. TABLES (U)
THE PAPER PRESENTS AN INVESTIGATION INTOPERCEPTIONS OF wESIRAdILITY AND PROdABILITY OrCERTAIN ALTLRNATIVE CIVIL DEFENSE PHORAMSo ITIS ONE OF A SERIES OF PAPERS 6ASED ON DATA FROM AUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH NAT!UNAL STUDY ENTITLEDCIVIL DEFENSE AND COLD *AR ATTITUDES,CONDUCTED DuRIN•j MID-196q WITH A PROBABILITY SAMPLEOF 1464 AMERICANS# THE FOCUS OF THE PAPER IS THE
LIST OF SIX POSSIBLE CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS,CALLED POSTURES. PR6SENTED IN THE QUEbTIONNAIRE.DESIRABILITY ANO PROBABILITY LVALUATIONS WERE RUNAGAINST OTHER OELEVANT CIVIL DEFENSE, COLDWAR AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTIC VARIAOLES IN oRDERTO ATTEmPT TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT AND CHARACTER OFSUPPORT FOR THESE DIFFERING TYPES OF PROGRAMS, THEVAST MAJORITY OF THE RESPONDENTS FOUND ALL SIXPOSTURES TO BE uESINABLE AND PROBABLE, BETWEEN64,91 AND 74*11 ASSESSED EACH POSTUNE AS HIGHLYDESIRABLE AND '4z33 CONSISTENTLY kATED EVERYPOSTURE AS HIGHLY DESIRABLE* ALTHOUGH THEPOSTURES DIFFERLD IN THE TYPE OF PROGRAM SUGGESTEDOTHE EVALUATIONS GIVEN TO THEM WERE VERY MUCH THESAM[E FURTHLR, FE*OUF THE VARIABLES AGAINST NHICHTHESE EVALUATIOIS hERE RUN YIELDED ANY EXPLANATION OFTHE CAUSES OF SwPPOAT* IT *AS CONCLUDED THAT THESECONSISTENTLY HIGH EVALUATIONS REFLECTED A FAITH INTHE GOVERNMLNT AND IN ANY PROGRAM THAT IT MIGHTENDORSE. (AUTHOo) (U)
56
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMPIL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZlqML7
Au-622 714APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES NAYNE PA
MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING ANALYSIS AND ITS
APPLICATIONS FOR THE CIVIL DEFENSE ORfANIZATInN, NU)
SEP 65 51P FISCHLM9 A. |SIEGELoARTMUR Is
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: I*CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL#PSYCMOMETRICS), CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, JOBANALYSIS, PERFORMANCE(eUMAN)o TRAINING*SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL, SELECTION. PERSONNELMANAGEMENT, APLIED PSYCHOLOGY (U)
THE REPORT DESCRIBES THE PRINCIPLES AND PROCEnURESASSOCIATED wITH MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING ANALYSIS,AND RELATES MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING ANALYSIS TO THECONCEPT OF A PERSONNEL SUBSYSTEM *ITHIN THE CIVILDEFENSE ORGANIZATION, FOUR AREAS OF APFLICATInNOF THE TECHNIQUE ARE PRESENTEDI THE AUTHORS CONCLUDETHAT THE TECHNIwUE IS OF BROAD RELEVANCE TO SYSTEM
PLANNINU AND IS FEASIBLE FOR APPLICATION TO THECIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL SyBSYSTEM. (AUTHOR)
(U)
57
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AU-62,e 817SYSTEM OEVELOPMENT CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
DEVELOPMENT OF OVERALL TRAINING PRO6RAMS FOR CIVIL
DEFLNSE* tU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL kEpT. FOR 5 NOV 63-30 AUG 65s
AUG 65 25uPREPT, NO. TM6L)'26UO/OUG/OtPkO.J: 44'31C
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTL:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL$ TRAINING),
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,SELECTION, JOB ANALYSIS, SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL.
LEARNING, CObTS iU)
A CUMPREHENSIVE EXAMI11ATION OF CIVIL DEFENSETRAININw IS MADt. AFTER DEFINITION OF CIVIL
DEFENSE OBJECTIvES, A TRAINING PROGRAM ANALYSiS IS
MADE NHICH ESTABLISHED SPECIFIC TRAINING REqUIREMENTS
AND DESCRIBES VARIOUS TRAINING PROGRAM ELEMENTS.
FROM A PERSPECTIVE INCLUDING THESE INPUTSo THE
CURRENT CIVIL DEFENSE TRAINING PROGRAM IS ANALYZED.
THREE ALTERNATIvE TRAINING PROGRAMS GEARED TO
DIFFERENT FUNDI,,G LEVELS AND A *PREPARATION FuR
CRISIS' PROGRAM ARE PROPOSED AND EXAMINED*
EVALUATION PLANS FOR THESE ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS AREPRESENTED olTH OISCUSSIuN OF COST EFFECTIVENESS@ A
THEORY OF INSTRUCTION FOR USE IN CIVIL DEFENSE
TRAINING IS PRESENTED, FINALLY, SUGGESTIONS FOR
FURTHER RESEARCH ARE MADE. (AUTHOR) (U)
58
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
AD-623 918 5/9 15/3IOWA AGRICULTURAL AND HOME ECONOMICS EXPERIMENT STATIONAMES
COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. ADELINEATION OF COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND AN ANALYSISOF THEIq CIVIL uEFENSE ATTITUDES, KNOWLEDGE9BEHAVIOX, A.,D SOURCES OF INFORMATION. lU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REpT.,65 183P BOHLENJOE Me ;BEALGEORGE
Me ;KLONGLAi•,4ERALD E.ITAITJOHN Le IREPT. NO. RURAL SOCIOLOGY-0O
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE;
DESCRIPTONS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE PtRSONNELs LEADERSHIP),(OSOCIOLOGY, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS), ATTITUDES.BEHAVIOR, JECISIUN MAKING, POWER, URBAN AREAS,RURAL AREAS, POPULATION, PUBLIC OPINION* FALLOUTSHELTERS, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, TAbLES, IOWA (U)
A SOCIAL POrtER MODEL I5 DEFINED WHICH MAY BE USEDBY THE LOCAL CIvIL UEFENSE DIRECTOR FOR ANALYZINGSOCIAL POWER IN HIS COMMUNITY. THE COMMUNITY
=• MEMBERS WHO HAVE SOCIAL POWER AND AFFLCT THECOMMUNITY DECISIONMAKING PROCESS ARE DESIGNATFD ASPOWER ACTORS, THE POWER ACTORS IN FIVE !OWACOMMUNITIES WERE INTENVIE*ED. THEy *ERE FOUND TOHAVE SIMILAR PERSONAL AND SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS.THE POWER ACTORS QERE PERCEIVED TO HAVE SOCIALPOAER IF THL COMMUNITY RAS TO BUILD A COMMUNITYFALLOUT SMELTER 1:4 THE NEAR FUTURE. THE POWERACTORS, CIVIL DEFENSE ATTITUDES, KNOWLEDGE, SOURCESOF INFORMATION, AND ACTIONS WERE ANALYZED. THEPO*ER ACTORS (1) HAD A LOW PERCEPTION OF THREAT,(2) PERCEIVED THAT *E SHOULD HAVE CIVIL DEFENSEPROGRAMS WHICH (A) LICENSES, MARKS, AND StOCKSEXISTIN(a BUILDINGS, (B) ENCOURAGES THECONSTRUCTION OF INDIVIDUAL FAMILy SHELTERS, (C)MAKLS AVAILABLE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC SHELTER SPACES IN NE* PUBLiCBUILDINGS, AND (L) ENCOURAGES COMMUNITIES ORLOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS TO CONSTRUCT THEIR OwNLOCALLY FINANCED COMMUNITY SHELTERS. (AUTHOR) (U)
59
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
27F --57=-- 77 --
UNCLASSIFIED
ODC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
Ao-623 943 5/9 15/3IOAA AGRICULTURAL AND HOME ECUNOMICS EXPERIMENT STATION
AMES
COMMUNITY PONER ACTOR. AND CIVIL DEFENSEt ADELINEATION OF COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND AN ANALYSISOF THEIR CIVIL DEFENSE ATTITUDES, KNOhLEDGE,BEHAVIOR, AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION@ (U)
DESCRIPTIVE .jOTE: FINAL SUMMARY REPTo,65 24 P BOHLENJOE Me IBEALoGEORGE
Me ;KLONGLANGERALD Es ITAITJOHN Lo IREPTe NO. RURAL :OCIOLOGY-qOS
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: SEE ASO AO-623 918 FOR COMPLETEFINAL REPORT*
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL OEFENSE PERSONNEL, LEADERSHIP),t*SOCIOLUGYo CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS), ATTITUDES,BEHAVIOR, DECISION MAKING, POWER, URBAN AREAS,RURAL AREAS, POPULATION, PUBIC OPINION, FALLOUTSHELTERS, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, TABLES: IOWA (U)
COMMUNITY POhER ACTORS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. AUELINEATION OF COMMUNITY POWER ACTURS AND AN ANALYSIS OFTHEIR CIVIL OEFENSE ATTITUDES, KNOOLEDGE, BEHAVIOR, ANDSOURCES OF INFORMATION,
60
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-62' 161 S/li jS/3
PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
ATTITUDES TONARU CIVIL DEFENSE: AN EXAMINATION OFTHE ATTRIBUTION OF MAXIMUM APPROVAL. (U)
OCT 65 82P SELDINqJ ELLIOT I
CONTRACT: OCO-OS-63-48TASK: 4812B
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTa;
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLICOPINION), (*PUBLIC OPINION. CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS), ATTITUDESt LEADERSHIP, COLD hARp
FALLOUT SHELTERS, SICIOLOGY, UNITED STATES,SAMPLING, STATISTICAL DATA, POPULATION,TABLES (U)
THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PAPER IS TO EXAMINE THEATTITUDES TOWARD CIVIL DEFENSE THAT THEAMERICAN PUbLIC ATTRIBUTES TO VARIOUS GROUPS ANDINDIVIDUALS* WE FIND THAT A SAMPLE OF THEAMERICAN PUBLIC BELIEVES THAT ALL THE GROUPS ANDINDIVIDUALS WE ASK ABOUT IN OUR STUDY FEEL FAVORABLYTOWARD CIVIL DEFENSE. HO*EVER, SOME GROUPS AREMUCH MORE FREQUENTLY CITED AS FAVURIN, CIVILDEFENSE THAN OTHERS, THE RESPONDENTS' PERSONALFEELINGS TOnARD CIVIL DEFENSE ARE ALSO HIGHFAVORABLE* THUS, ALTHOUGH THERE Is vAR1ATION yN
ATTF-IdUTIOm PATTERNS DEPENDENT UPON THE GROUP TOWHICH THE ATTRIaUTIONS ARE MADE AND THERE EXIqTDIFFERENCES IN THE PERSONAL FEELINGS OF RESPONDENTS,MOST PEOPLE SUPPORT CIVIL DEFENSE AND MOST PEOPLEBELIEVE THAT A AIDE RANCJE OF (aROUPS AND INDIVIDUALSSUPPORT CIVIL DLFENSEe GIVEN THESE QENERALRESULTS, NE FIND THAT ATTRIBUTION PATTERNS ALSO VARYACCORDING TO THE POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS OFRESPONDENTS :EoG., AGE, SEXo INCOME. ETC.? ANDTHE PERSONAL ATTITUDES OF RESPONDENTS (THE MOREFAVORABLE ONE I1 TOo;ARD CIVIL DEFENSE# THE MORELIKELY HE IS TO BELIEVE OTHERS TO BE FAVORABLE).FINALLY, THE INFLUENCE OF PERSONAL FAVORABILITY UPONATTRIBUTIONS IS MEDIATED BY POPULATIONCHARACTERISTICS. HOLDING FAVORABILITY CONSTANT,ATTRIBUTION PATTERNS VARY ACCORDING TO THE PARTICULARPOPULATION CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTSe(AUTHOR) JUl
61
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO, /ZMML7
AU- 6 2' 701 15/3 '4/1 12/2 18/3RESEARCH TRIANGLE IiqST DURHAM N C OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND
ECONOMICS DIV
A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF SELECTEu PARAMETERS EASEDON 8 SMSAfSe (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT., VOL, 2,oCT 6S 7,4P SINKH. ROONLY
RLPT* NOs R-OU-1S7PROJ: RTI-OU-167TASK: 141I13L
UNCLASSIFIED REPOKT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DLSCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, RADIOACTTVEFALLOUT), (*FALLUUT SHELTERS, CIVIL UEFENSESYSTEMS), (OUPERATIONS RESEARCH, CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS), MATHEMATICAL MODELS,
PROGRAMMING(COmPUTERS), FEDERAL aUDGETS,
RADIOLOGICAL DOSAGE, NUCLEAR WARFARE, COSTEFFECTIVENESS, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (U)
IN ORDER TO PERFORM A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OFSELECTED PARAMETERS OF INTEREST IN CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS ANALYSIS, PRObABLE CASUALTIES ARE ESTIMATEDFOR B SMSA'S OVER A RANGE OF FALLOUT ENVINONMENTSAND SHELTER UTILIZATION PATTERNS# THE SELECTEDPARAMETERS ARE: SMSA POPULATION, POPULATIONDENSITY, ANG RATIO UF SHELTER SPACES TO POPULATIONIFALLOUT ARRIVAL TIME AND REFERENCE INTENSITYi ANDRESTRICTIONS ON MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE TO SHELTER,
LEADING TO VARYING PATTERNS OF SHELTER UTILIZATION.THE SMSAOS ARE SELECTED BY 'JUDGMENT SAMPLINGSAND RANGE IN POPULATION FROM 74,OuO TO 408,000.THE FALLOUT ENVIRONMENTS uSED RANGE FROM AREFERENCE INTENSITY OF 600 N/HR AND 7 HOURS TIME OFARRIVAL TO A REFERENCE INTENSITY OF 3,OOU R/HR AND 1HOUR TIME OF ARRIVAL. THE MOVEMENT-TOSHELTERRESTRICTIONS ARL; (1) MOVEMENT RESTRICTED Tu THESTANDAPO LOCATION (SL) OF RESIDENCE, (2)MOVEMENT RESTRICTED TO nITHIN T4O MILES OF THE SL
OF RESIuENCE, AND (3) UNRESTRICTED MOVEMENT ToSHELTER ANY6HERE WITHIN THE SMSA, ALSO, (4)
THE TRANSPORTATION AL60RITHM IS USED TO DETERMINE THEOPTIMAL (MINIMUM CASUALTY) ALLOCATION OF PEOPLETO SHELTER FOR tACH TIML OF ARRIVAL AND REFERENCEINTENSITY COMBINATION, THIS ALLOCATION SERVES AS ABENCHMARK OF IDOALITY AGAINST 4HICH TO MEASURF OTHERPATTERNS OF SHELTER UTILIZATION. (U)
62UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
AD-624 706 15/3
STANFORD 4E5E,,RCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
CIVIL DEFENSE IN UERMANY9 (U)
OCT 65 s'P MCGEEARTHUR A. I
CONTRACT' OCD0oS-63-1"8PROJ: SRI-MU'4559TASK: 26Z2A
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*WEST GERMANY, CIVIL DEFENSE
SYSTEMS)* (OCIVI1 DEFENSE SYSTEMS, WESTGERMANY), LA0t GOVERNMENT(FOREIGN), WARNING
bYSTEMSs MONITORS, FALLOUT SHELTERS, CIVILDEFENSE PERSONNEL, EVACUATION, POPULATION,POLICE* HOSPITALS* INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION, FOOD.TRANSPORTATION, ,,ATER SUPPLIES (U)
THE REPORT CONTAINS THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY OFCIVIL DEFENSE PLANNING AND PREPARATION IN THEFEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY# THE STUDIES AREPNIMARILY ORIENTED TOWARD DEFINING OPERATIONAlORGANIZATION, ALTHOUGH POLICY, PLANNING@ AND TRAININGORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE HAD A STRONG IMPACT INPROMOTING 7-E GROtTH OF CIVIL DEFENSE PREPAREDNESSWERE ALSO INVESTIGATED* (AUTHOR) (U)
63
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
- s
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
AD-624 87U 15/3DUNLAP AND ASSOCIATES INC DARIEN CONN
TRAINING HEWUIREMENTS FOR POSTATTACK ADAPTIVE
BEHAVIOR, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,(EC 65 II4P TEALGILBEkT E- ;FABRI7IO,
RALPH A, ;BARNESSTANLEY mtIMOELLERWILLIAMA*
REPT. NO. SSD-6S-245 (b46)
UNCLAzSIFIED kEPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NoTE;
DESCRIPTORS: (*CiVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, TRAINING),
ivUCLEAR *ARFARE9 SURvIVAL, FALLOUT SHELTERS,
BEHAVIOR, POPULATION* EDUCATION, CUMMUNICATION
SYSTEMS, DISASTERS. MOTIvATION, LEARNING,
LEADEPSHIP, MANAGEMENT PLANNIN(a (U)
THE STUDY IS AIMED AT (1) IDENTIFYING ACTIONS
REQUIRED OF AND BENLFICIAL TO INDIVIDUALS IN A POST-
ATTACK ENVIRONMENT AND (2) DEVELOPING GUIDELINESCONCERNING CONTtNT AND METHODS OF TRAINING AHICH
OOULD GENERATE ADAPTAVE BEHAVIOR. METHODS OF STUDY
*ERE LIMITED TO LITERATURE REVIEO AND SCIENTIFIC
ARGUMENT. Ty,O MAuOR TRA:NING OBJECTIVES ARE
SPECIFIED: TRAIN!NG To MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
INDIVIDUAL :)URVIVAL; AND OF SOCIETAL RECOVERY. IT
IS RECOMMENDED THAT TRAINING MATERIALS aE STOCKED INPUBLIC sHELTERS TO SUPPORT THESE OBJECTIVES* pOST-
ATTACK SITUATIONS AILL REQUIRE THAT SUCH MATERIALS BE
REAOILY AVAILABLE AND USED IN CONJUNCTION *ITN ON-
THE-SPOT TRAININtas AND THE CREATION AND COMMUNICATION
OF SPECIFIC RECOVERY PLANS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES.IT IS ALSt, RECUmMENDED THAT CERTAIN INFORMATION
BASIC TO EDUCATION OF THE PUBLIC IN EMERGENCY
MEASURES BE PREPARED FOR TIMELY USE IN MASS
COMMUNICATION MEDIA AT SU:H TIMES AS CRISES OR
DISASTERS PROVIDE TmE ESSENTIAL MOTIVATION TO LEARN.
IT IS SUGGESTED THAT TRAINING IS THE RESPOSIBILITY
MAINLY OF LOCAL COMMUNITY POLITICAL AUTHORITY; THE
EFFECTIvENEzS OF TRAINING *ILL DEPEND HEAVILY UPONTHE DEGREE TO 6HICH SUCH LEADERSHIP HAS THE KNOWLEDGE
AND RESOURCES NECESSARY TO CONDUCT THIS FUNCTION*
(AUTHOR) (U)
64
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIFO
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMflL7
AD-624 ?29 15/3STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
SWISS CIVIL DEFENSE. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,NOV 65 SuP MCGEEARTHUR A. I
CONTRACT: OCO-OS-63-18IPROJ: SRI-4559
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLLMENTARY NOTt;
DESCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, SWITZERLAND)oCOMMAND + CONTROL SYSTEMS, LAW, MANACIEMENTPLANNING, GOVERNMENT(FOREIGN), CIVIL DEFENSEPERSONNELo THAININCo MANPOWER STUDIES, ARMEDFORCES(FOREI1N)v SHELTERS (U)
THE REPORT CONTAINS THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY OFCIVIL DEFENSE PLANNING AND PREPARATION IN THE 5ISSFEDLRATION. THE STUDY IS PRIMARILY ORIENTEDTOWARD DEFINING OPERATIONAL ORGANIZATION, ALTHOUGHPOLICY, PLANNING, AND TRAINING ORGANIZATIONS THAT&AVL HAU A STRONG IMPACT IN PROMOTING THE GROWTH OF
C*VIL DLFENSE PREPAWEDNESS "ERE ALSO INVESTIGATED.(A.'THOR) (U)
65
UNCLASSIFIED !MMOL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIUGNAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Nos /ZMML7
AU-625 17Z s/3 13/2PLANNING RESEARCH CORP LOS ANGELES CALIF
THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF DECENTRALIZED
METROPOLITAN REGION$* (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,OCT 65 296P *OLTMAN.,h Re ;WOODFILis
BARBARA 16LUNTKEITH IDEIROSSIJAMES IREPT. NO* PRC-0-796CONTRACT: OC"-OS-62-278
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: SEE ALSO AD'-26 9259
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, URBAN ARrAS)t(OURbAN PLANNING, ECONOMICS), FEASIBILITY STuDiES,"COSTS, POPULATION$ DISTRIBuTIONs DENbITY,HOUSING PROJLCTS. TRANbPORTATION, PASSIVEDEFENSE (U)
THE PRECEDING PHASE OF THIS STUDY EXAMINED THE ROLEOF URBAN FORM AS A PASSIVE DEFENSE VARIABLE ANDESTABLISHED CRITERIA OF SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT ANDDENSITY# WHICH hERE DESIGNED TO REDUCE METROPOLITANVULNERAOILITY Tr, NUCLEAR ?,EAPONS9 THE RESULTINGCONFIGURATION CONSISTS OF COMPACT, DISCRETE COHMUNITYUNITS HAVING POPULA1IONS oF 100tOOO, SEPARATED FROMONE ANOTHER BY 4 TO 7 MILES OF OPEN SPACE, ANDGROUPED AROUND A CENTRAL OR CURE UNIT* SERVICESAND FACILITIES THAT ARE OBTAINABLE IN A METkOPOLITANAREA OF SEVERAL MILLION ARE MADE AVAILABLE IN THISCONFI1UNATION BY HIGH IN- iCOMMUNITY MOBILITY, THESTUDY CONFIGURATION IS TAKEN TO BE THIS 'ORDEREDSPRAWL' URBAN PATTERN. THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OFTHIS FORM OF NEGIONAL CITY IS ASSESSED. THE FOCUSI5 NECESSARILY ON COSTS, WHICH ARE TO SOME DEGREEMEASURABLE, AND ALTHOUGH COST DATA DIRECTLY PERTINENTTO THE IDEALIZATION DO NOT EXIST9 IT IS POSSIBLE TOPROCEED INFERENTIALLY BY ANALYZING INFOR;iATIONDERIVED FROM EXTANT METROPOLITAN AREAS, THEPRIMARY APPHOACH IS THE SPECIFICATION OF A tREFERENCEREGION' THAT INCORPORATES STRUCTURAL AND LINKAGECHARACTERISTICS REPRESENTATIVE OF EXISTING URBANAREAS, AND THE DIVISION OF THIS REGION INTOCOMPONENTS THAT APPROAImATE CuMMUNITY UNITS OF THESTUDY CUNFliURATIUNs (U)
66
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZMML7
AD-631 613 5/1o 15/3
MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING COLL OF COMMUNICATION
ARTS
THE EFFECTS OF LOW CREDIBLE SOURCES ON MESSAGrACCEPTANCE: FOUR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES INPERSUASION$ (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REpTotMAR 66 37P GREENBERGBRADLEY So I
MILLER9GERALD R. IREPT. NO. 6G'-1
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYs oCIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS), INFORMATION THEORY, SOURCES, ATTITUDES.PUBLIC OPINION, REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY), FALLOUTSHELTERS IU)
THIS SERIES OF STUDIES PROVIDES EVIDENCE IN SuPPORTOF THE FOLLOWING PROPOSITIONS: (1) IF A MESSAGEIS TO BE TRANSMITTED TO AN AUDIENCE WHICH PERCEIVESTHE MESSAGE SOURCE AS RELATIVELY LO* IN CREDIBILITY,TME MESSAGE WILL BE MORE EFFECTIVE IF THE
IDEi4TIFICATION OF THE SOURCE IS DELAYED UNTIL AFTEREXPOSURE TO THE MESSAGEI (2) *HERE THE SOURCE OFA MESSAGE :5 LIKELY TO BE PERCEIVED AS RELATIVELY LOWIN CREDIBILITY, THE MESSAGE WILL BE MORE EFFECTIVEWITHOUT ANY IDENTIFIED SOURCE THAN WITH THE LOWCREDIBLL SOuRCEI (3) A MESSAGE WILL GENERALLY BEEFFECTIVE IN THE INTENDED MANNER, EVEN WITH A SOURCEPERCEIVED AS LO4 CREDIBLE. IN COMPARISON *ITH NOMESSAGE AT ALL: (4) WHEN THE SOURCE OF THEMESSAGE IS PERCEIVED BY SOME AUDIENCE AS HIGH INCREDIBILITY, THE MESSAGE 4ILL BE MORE EFFECTIVE IFTHE SOURCE IS IuENTIFIED BEFORE INDIVIDUALS AREEXPOSED TO THE mESSAGE. THESE FINDINGS ARECONFIRMED IN STUDIES DEALING 6ITH BOTH CIVIL oEFENSETOPICS UNRELATEu TO CIVIL DEFENSE, (AUTHOR) (U)
67
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMMLl
Au-631 756 15/3 8/6BUREAU OF TmE CtNSUS WASHINGTON D C
NATIONAL LOCATION CODL, OCD-GEF RLSION le (U)
RLPT. NO, FG-D-3.1/,.
SUNCLA!)SIFILD REPOmT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: FOHmiRLY REPTs NO. FG-]V-3,/:I.
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS$ GEOGRAPHY)DAMA4E ASSESSMENT, POPULATION, URBAN AREAS,CONNECTICUT, MAINE@ MASSACHUSETTS, NL*HAMPSHIRE, NEW JkRSEY, Nt YORK, PUExTOkICO, RHUDE ISLAtoDs VERMONT, VIR6iNISLANDS
(U)
THE MANUAL ON THE NE. NATIONAL LOCATION CODEIS PUdLISmEo FOk THE USE OF FCDERAL, STATE ANnLOCAL CIVIL OEFkNSE AND EMERGENCY PLANNING OFFICIALSWHITM AMAGE ASSESSMENT, RESOUNCE EVALUATION ORSHELTER PLANNINt2 RESPONSIBILITIES, THE MANUAL ISDESIGNEO To SERVE USERS IN TWO 4AYS* FIRST# IT CANBE USED AS A CONVENIENT SOURCE FOR THE GEOGRAPHICSCOORDINATES OF NEfi RESOURCES TO BE INCLUDED IN OANDOR COMPUTER DAMAGE ASSESSmENT SYSTEMSe SECOND. ITPROVIDES, IN A CONVENIENT FORM, THE INFORMATION ONDISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION THAT Ib REQUIRED ToPREPARE REGION, STATE AND LOCAL ESTIMATES OFCASUALTIES RESULTING FROM ACTUAL OR ASSUMED ENEMYATTACK. (U)
68
UNCLASSIFIED /ZNML?
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPOHT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
Au-631 757 15/3 8/6
BUREAU OF THE CLNSUS OASHINGTON D C
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCO-OEP REGION 2. IU)
6Z 462PREPT* NO, FG-D-3,1/2,
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NoTE: FORMERLY REPT. NO* FG-IV-3.I/2,SEE ALSO Au-63l 756s
DLSCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, GEOGRAPHY),
DAMAUE ASSESSMENT# PUPULATION. URBAN AREAS,
DELAnARE, UISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KENTUCKY,
MARYLAND, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA# VIRGINIA, RESTvIRGINIA (U)
NATIONAL LOCATION COVE, OCD-OEP REGION 2:
DELARAmE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KENTUCKYs MARYLAND,OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, VINGINIA, WEST VIRQINIA,
69
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEV
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-631 758 15/3 8/6BUREAU UF THE CENSUS WASHINGTON D C
NATIONAL LOCATIUN CO.DL OCD-OEP REGION 3. (U)
62 'sliPREPT. NO, FG-D-3,l/3o
UNCLA5SIFIED REPONT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTt: iEE ALSO AD-631 756.
DESCR1PTONS: (eCIVIL UEFENSE SYSTEMS, GEOGRAPHv)oUAMAqE ASSESSMENTs PUPULATION, URBAN STUDIES,ALABAMAt FLOKIDAo GEuRGIA, MISSISSIPPI, NORTmCAROLINA, PANAMA. SOUTH LAROLINA, TENNESSEE (U)
NATIONAL LOCATION COOEo OCD-OEP REGION 2:ALABAMA, CANAL ZONE, FLORIDA, GEOR41AIMISSISSIPPI, NORTH CAROLINA, 56UTH CAROLINA*TENNESSEE,
70
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEU
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML,7
AD-631 759 15/3 8/6BUREAU UF THE CLNSUS WASHINGTON D C
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCD-OEP REGION 4. (U)
62 '42PREPT. NO. FG-D-3.1/4$
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTt: FORMERLY REPTo NO. FG-IV-3.I/qoSEE ALSO AD-631 756o
DESCRIPTONS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS* GEOGRAPHY).DAMAGE ASSESSMENT# POPULATION, URBAN AREAS,ILLINOISo INUIANA, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA,
WISCONSIN (U)
NATIONAL LOCATIOr, COUE, OCD-OEP REGION it:
iLLINOIS, INUIANAt MICHIGANo MINNESOTA, *1SCONIN.
71
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLA5SIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
AD-631 76u |/i /BibBUREAU OF THE CLNSUS *ASHINGTUN D CNATIONAL LOCATION CODE, OCDOOEP REGION So (U)
k62 376PREPT. NO. FG-0-3*1/S,
UNCLASSIFIED REPOkT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTt: FORMERLY FGmIV-3.l/5. SEE ALSOAD- 6 3 1 756.
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEmS, GEOGRAPHY),OAMA6E ASSESSMENT, POPULATION, URBAN AREAS,ARKANSAS, LOUISIANA, NE4 MEXICO, OKLAHOMA#TEXAS (U)
THIS MANUAL ON THE NEW NATIONAL LOCATION CODEIS PUBLISHED FOR THE USE OF FEDERAL, STATE ANnLOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE AND EMERGENCY PLANNIN4 OFFICIALSWITH DAMAGE ASSESSMLNT, RESOURCE EVALUATION ORSHELTER PLANNIN6 RESPONSIBILITIES= THE MANUAL ISDESIGNED TO SERVE USERS IN TWO AAYSo FIRST# IT CANBE USED AS A CO;,VENIENT SOURCE FOR THE GEOGRAPHICCOOADINATES OF NEn RESOURCES TO BE INCLUDED IN HANDOR COMPUTER DAMAGE ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS* SECOND. ITPROVIDES, IN A CONVENIENT FORM, THE INFORMATIoN ONDISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION THAT IS REWUIRED ToPREPARE REGION, STATE AND LOCAL ESTIMATES OFCASUALTIES RESULTIN4 FROM ACTUAL OR ASSUMED ENEMYATTACK. (AUTHOR) (U)
72
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
• < • •-••--'•• - -• ' - -i• ¥:•i~ • • ' - -- ••• -- .... . ... • ... ... .. .. .. -
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-631 761 15/3 B/6BUREAU Of THE CENSUS *ASHINGTON D C
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE, OCD-OEP REGION 6e (U)
62 414P
REPT. NO. FG-O-3.l/6o
UNCLASSIrIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: FORMERLY FG-IV-3.l/6o SEE ALSOAD-631 756.
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, GEOGRAPHy),DAMAGE ASSESSMENTo POPULATIONo URBAN AREAS#COLORADO, IOmA, KANSAS, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA,NORTH DAKOTA, SOuTH DAKOTA. *YOMINQ (U)
NATIONAL LOCATIO:N CODE, OCo-OEP REGION 6:COLORADOo 1O*A, KANSAS* MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTHDAKOTA, SOUTm DAKOTA, WYOMING*
73
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIEE
ODC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
AU-631 761 Ib/3 8/6BUREAU OF THE CENSUS ItASHINGTUN D CNATIONAL LOCATION CUDE, OCD-OLP REGION 7, U)
62 233PREPT. NO. FG-D-3,1/70
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTt: FORMERLY FG-IV-3*1/7, SEE ALSOAD-631 756,
DESCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL OEFENsE SYSTEmSo GEOGRAPHY).DAMAbE ASSESSMENTt POPULATION# URBAN AREAS#ARIZONAt CALIFORrNIAs HAVAII, NEVADA. UTAH,PACIFIC OCEAN ISLANDS
(U)
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE, UCo-OEP REGION 7: ARIZONA,AMERICAN SAMOA, CALIFORNIA. GUAM, HAOAII@NEVAOA, UTAH*
74
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFPEu
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO, /ZMML7
AD-631 763 15/3 B/6BUREAU OF TmE CLNSUS WASHINGTON D C
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE, OcD-OEP REGION 8, (U)
62 I8tPREPT. NO, FG-D-3.1/8,
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: FORMERLY FG-IV-3#I/8* SEE ALSOAD-631 7!66
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, GEOGRAPHY),DAMAGE ASSESSMENT, POPULATION, URBAN AREAS,ALASKA, IDAHO, MUNTANA, OREGON,WASHINGTON(STATE! (U)
NATIONAL LOCATION COOE, OCD-OEP REGION 8: ALASKA,IDAHO, MONTANA, OREGONo i.ASHINGTUN,
75
UNCLASSIFILO /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-632 59b 6/21 15/4 15/6DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION AND hELFARE WASHINGTON 0C
REVIEW OF COMBINED TRAUMA: RESEARCH, CLINICALMANAGEMENT AND PLANNING, (U)
JAN 66 174P VILLIAMSiDEAN Os ;DUGGARtBENJAMIN C, BBURGERED6ARD j,•CHAMBERLIN,HARRY S,
CONTRACT: OCD-OS-63-1'iI PH-8 6 -64-134
UNCLASSIFIEU REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY N'TE:
DLSCRIPTORS: (*NUCLEAR *ARFARE CASUALTIES, OQADIATION
INJURIES), CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, NUCLEAR WEAPONS,tURfS, RADIATION SICKNESS, RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT,
dLASTs WOUNDS + INJURIES, INFECTIONS,ANTIBIOTICS, IMMUNITY9 MEDICINE, THERAPY,5HOCK(PATHOLOGY), ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION,ELECTROLYTES(PHYSIOLOGY), RAOIOLOGICAL DOSAGE,DISASTERS, SuRVIVAL, MEDICAL PERSONNEL,MANAGEMENT PLANNINg, BIBLIOGRAPHIES (U)
THE REVIEh COVERS THE TOPIC OF COMBINED TRA.,MA--
RADIATIUN INJURY PLUS BURNS, PHYSICAL INJURy, AND/ORINFECTION, SINCE THIS CLASS OF CASUALTY IS ALMOSTEXCLUSIVELY THE PRODUCT OF NUCLEAR oEAPONS EFFECTS,THE EMPHASIS OF THE REVIEh IS ON PRINCIPLES OFCLINICAL MANAGEMENT, MAJOR SECTIONS OF THE REVIEwARE: (1) A CASUALTY MODEL, GENERATED TO ASSESSTHE SIGNIFICANCE OF COMbINED TRAUMA RELATIVE TO OTHERFORMS OF INJURY. (2) A REVIEW OF CLINICALMANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR CARE OF COMBINED TRAUMAPATIENTS, (3) CLINICAL GUIDES TU THE CARE OFRAUIATION, BURN, AND INFECTION CASUALTIES. (4) AREVIE6 OF THE RECENT COMBINED TRAUMA RESEARCHo AND(5) A SJMMARY OF PLANNING MEASURES DESIGNED TOASSIST IN PREPAREONESS FOR DISASTER MEDICAL CARE,AN EXTENSIVE BIdLIOGRAPHY IS ALSO INCLUDED,(AUTHOR) (U)
76
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
S~I
UN;LASSIFIED
-dc Rr.oI•O BI.'LIOGHAPpY •SEARCH CONTROL NOt /ZMML 7
AO-632 865 6/5 15/3 13/2 15/1SRESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND
S~ECONOMICS DIV
ENVIRONtMENTAL HEALTH PLANNING FOR POSTATTACKCONDITIONS: SOME PROBLEMS, PROGRAMS# ANDPAIURITIES, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT,9APR 66 SUP SALMoNRAPHAEL Ji
RLPTo NO. R-OU-197,
CONTRACT: PH-86-65-16
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DLSCRIPTORS: (*MANAGEMENY PLANNING, *PUBLIC HEALTH),(*PUBLIC HE-.TH, NUCLEAR WARFARE), CIVIL DEFENSESYSTLMS, OVERATIUN5 RESEARCH, DISEASES, DISEASEVECTORS* SURVIVALs FOOD, HOUSING, WATERSUPPLIES, %ASTES(SANITARY ENý 1INEERING)s NUCLEAR(WARFARE CASUALTIES (U)
IDENTIFIERS: POSTATTACK OPLRATIONS (U)
CONDITIONS IMPOSED By MASSIVE NUCLEAR ATTACK CAN BEEXPECTED TO DISRUPT NORMAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHSERVICES OF COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT THE UNITEDSTATES, AND TO THREATEN THE HEALTH OF SURVIVINGPOPULATIOn. THIS STUDY DEVELOPS A FRAMEWORK TOHELP DECISION-MAKERS EVALUATE POSTATTACK CONDITIONSRLLATIVE TO ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. REVIEO ANDANALYSIS OF EXISTIN6 INFORMATION ON PROBABLEPOSTATTACK CONDITIONS AS THEY MIGHT AFFECT, AND BE
AFFECTED BY, PERSONNEL OF LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS,PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIOi, AND RESOURCE MANAG'.MENTPRACTICES IS PRESENTED. ANTICIPATED POSTA;TACKENVIRONME.iTAL HEALTm PROBLEMS ARE IDENTIFIED, ANDPkIURITy JUDGMENTS ARE MADE ON A COMPARATIVE BASIS INTLRMS OF LEVEL OF GRAVITY, RATIONALE SUPPORYINGTHE JUDGMENTS IS INCLUDED, AND oOTH ACTION ANDRESEARCH PROGRAMS TO IMPROVE PREPAREDNESS ANERECoMMENDLDo IMPORTANT SOURCES OF DATA PRESCRIBEDFOx THIS STUDY WERE THE REPORTS AND *ORKING PAPERS OFAN EARLIER Us So PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICEPROJECT. tENVIRONMENTAL HLALTH PROBLEMS INTHE POST SHELTER PERIOD', IN ADDITION, FOURCITY HEALTH DEPARTMENTS *ERE VISITED TO ASSIST IN
ANALyCIS OF NORMAL ENv'IRONMENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONSRELA.iVE To THOSE EXPECTED IN A POSTATTACK RECOVERYPERIOD AND OF THE ABILITY OF A LOCAL HEALTH AGENCY TOCOPE *IrH PROJECTED CONDITIONS* (AUTHOR) U)
77UNCLA';SIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
I&DC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
: AU-635 150 5/11 15/3PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
IMPACT OF THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS. PATTERNS OFPUBLIC RESPONSE. (U)
FEB 66 85P MAST, ROdERT HoCONTRACT: OCD-PS-64-61lTASK' 4 8-21-c,
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS; (eCOLD OAR, PUBLIC OPINION), (OcIVILUEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLIC OPINION), ATTITUDES$POPULATION, UNITED STATES, CUBA. RESPONSE,REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY), PERCEPTION(PSYCHOLOGY).NUCLEAR OARFAREo DECISION MAKING, FALLOUT SHELTERS,DISARMAMENT NXIETY, .EHAVIOR, SOCIOLOGY,STATISTICAL OATA (U)
THE REPORT EXAMINES THE IMPACT OF A CRITICAL EVENTOh TH;E AMERICAN PUBLIC AND ATTEMPTS TO ASSESS THESUBSTANCE AND DYNAMIC OF THE PUBLICOS RESPONSE TO THERESULTING CR:SIS SITUATI "4 ivITH SPECIAL EMPHASIP ONRSPuNSES ASSOCIATED WITH C-vIL DEFENSE MEASURES.THE EVENT IN.'OLVED PAS THE CUBAN MISSILE CISIS OF1962 WHICh PRODUCED A PERIOD OF SEVERE INTERNATIONALTL.-SIONe IN A 1963 SAMPLE, ,MERICANS AERE AsKED
4 IF THEY HAD ENGAGED IN ANY uF SIX CRISIS RELATEOACTIVITIES DURING THE CUBAN CRISiS, THESEACTIVITIES COMPHISEU EFFORTS TO RESPOND IN SOMEMEANINGFUL FASHION TO THE THREAT POSED BY THE CNISISoPATTERNS OF RESPONSE WERE EXAMINED, BOTH FOROVERALL DISTRIBUTV•NS AMONG THE ýIx ATIvITIES AND FORPAIRED SETS OF ACT:- ITIES. INDIVIDUALS IN THESAMPLE 6ERE CLASSI•sED BY THEIR DEGREE OFPARTICIPATION I' THE VARIoUS ACTIVITIES. TwOSE *HOHAD ENGAGED !N IANY ACTIVITY, WERE COMPARED MITHTHOSE WHO HAD NOT, AND THOSE WHO HAO ENGAGED IN EACHOF THE SIX SEPARATE ACTIVITIES hERE COMPAED *ITH EACH3THLR, THE SUB-TOTA.S AND THE FIFTEEN SETS OF PAIREDACTIVITIES AS WELL. THESE COMPAKISOiNS -VERE MADEWITH REGARD TO PENSONAL fhAkACTERISTICS THAT SERVEDTU LOCATE IND!VIDUALS IN THE OVERALL SOCIAL STRUCTUREAND ALSO 6ITH REGARD TO PERSONAL ATTITUDES DEEMED TOBE oF RELEVANCE FOR CRISIS RESPONSE, DIFFERENCESIN CRISIS RESPONSE WERE FOUND AfvD THEY ESTABLISHEDSUM-ARY PATTERNS THAT ARE OF THEORETICAL INTERST,(A rTHUR) (U)
78UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
U)DC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
Au-637 167 15/3 5/11MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING DEPT OFCOMMUNICATION
THE DEVELOPMENT OF VALUES AND BELIEFS IN YOUNGAMERICANS TOWARD FALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVILDEFENSE. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE! PILOT STUDY REPT. NO. 1oJAN 66 90P GREENBERGBRADLEY S, IPETTERSENtDuANE IKOCHEVAR,JUHN
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REpT, ON COMMUNICATION RESEARCH,
DESCRIPTORS: (*FALLOUT SHELTERS9 *PUBLIC OPINION),CHILDREN: ADOLESCENTSt ATTITUDES. CIVIL DEFENSE
SYSTEMS, SOCIAL SCIENCES, CULTURE, STATISTICALANALYSIS IU)
WHAT KINDS OF BELIEFS AND OPINIONS DO YOUNGSTERS INTHEIR PRE-TEEN AND TEENAGE YEARS HAVE TOWARD FALLOUT
SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. 327 EIGHTH AND TWELFTHGRAoERS WROTE EXTEMPORANEOUS ESSAYS ON tfWHAT IKNOlv ABOUT FALLOUT SHELTERtst ATTITUDESTOhARD THIS TCPIC WERE ASSESSED BY TRAINED CODERS ONTHE BASIS OF THEIR DEGREE OF FAVORAILITY TONARDSFALLOUT SHELTERS IN GENERALo PRIVATE SHELTERSt PUBLICSHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE, EACH OF THE ATTITUDESWAS RELA T D TO AGE, SEX, RACE, SOCIAL CLASS AND
PERSON'L ABILI T Y OF THE YOUNGSTERS. GENERALLY,YOUNGSTERS HOLD FAVORABLE ATTITUDES TOOARD 30THFALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL aEFENSE, AND THESEEXPRESSED ATTITUDES ARE STRONGLY HELD. IN TERMS OFAGEs THE YOUNGER STUDENTS ARE MORE FAVORABLE TOWARDBOTH TYPEb OF SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE IN GENERAL.SEX DIFFERENCES *ERE INSIGNIFICANT; HO*EVER. BOYSTENuED TO BE SOMEWHAT LESS FAVORABLE. ATTITUDES OFWHITE AND NON-WHITE YOUNGSTERS WERE STRIKINGLYDIFFERENT W!TH NON-hHI-E STUDENTS CONSISTENTLYEXPRESSING MORE FAVORABLE ATTITUDES TO*ARD bOTH5HELTER' AND CIVIL DEFENSE. SOCIAL CLASS APPEAREDT0 dE UNRELATED TO ATTITUDES EXPRESSED ON THIS TOPIC.A THIRD SIGNIFICANT CORRELATE OF ATTITUDES WASPERSONAL ABILITY. THE MORE ABLE STUDENTS WITHHOLDSUPPORT FROM BOTH SMELTERS AND C;VIL DEFENSE, wHILE
THE LESS ABLE ON HiGHLY FAVORABLE. (AUTHOR) (U)
79UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIF ED
ODC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZMML7
AD-637 168 1b/3 5/11MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSIN(a DEPT OFCOMMUNICATION
THE DEVELOPMENT OF VALUES AND BLLIEFS IN YOUNGAMERICANS TO4ARF FALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVILDEFENSE, (U)
CESCRIPTIVE NOTE: PILOT STUDy REPT. NO. 2.MAY 66 73P 6REENBERGBRADLEY So I
PETTERSENDUANE ;KOCHEVARJOHN
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REPT. ON CCMMUNICATION RFSEARCH.SEE ALSO AD-637 167.
DLSCRIVTORS: (*FALLOUT SHELTERS, ePUBLIC OPINION),CHILVREN, ADOLESCENTS9 ATTITuDES, CIVIL DEFENSE5YSTEMS, SOCIAL SCIENCES, CULTURE, STATISTICALANALYSIS (U)
THI1 IS THE SECOND OF THREE REPORTS CONCERNING THE
ATTITUDES EXPRESSED BY AMERICAN YOUNGSTERS TOWARDFALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. THE PRESENTSTUoY FOCUSSED ON THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF AGE, SEX,RACE AND PERSONAL ABILITY ON THEIR OPINIONS. WN'NTHESE VARIABLES AkE CONTROLLED SINGLY AND TOGETt.ZR INANALYZING OPIONIONS, WE FIND THE FOLLO*INGs INTERMS OF AGE, YOUNGER STUDENTS *ERE MORE FAVORABLE TOFALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE vbITH NO CHANGESINTý(ODUc.ED BY CONTROLLING FOR OTHER VARIABLES.RACE A'-SO REMAINED HIGHLY CORRELATED WITHATTITUDES, AFTER CONTROLLING OTHER FACTORS. NON-
tfOUNGSTERS, BUT THE DIFFEIRENCE WAS MOST PRONOUNCEDAMONG THE OLDER NON-WHITES. PERSONAL ABILITYACCOUNTED FOR DIFFERENCES IN ATTITUDE TOWARD FALLOUTSHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. THE HIG"ER ABILITYsTUOENTS, ESPECIALLY THE OLuER ONE5, WERE LESSFAVORABLE TOAARD THE T11O OPINION AREAS, SEX AAS AKEAKf NEGLIGIBLE CORRELATE OF THESE ATTITUDES, ANDSEX DID NOT INTERACT WITH THE OTHER VARIABLES*(AUTHOR) (U)
80
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO@ /ZMML 7
AU-637 766 15/3 5/.
SYSTEM UEVELOPMENT CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
EMLHGENCY OPERATIONS SIMULATION RESEARCH. (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT,MAY 66 12UP CUSACKBs Le IFLINTRHEA i
GItdONSqR. Do ;HANEYvT. P. ;SWAVELYOD C. i
RLPT. NO. TM(L)'2938/O0I/OO,
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTLU
DESCRIPTORS: (OCIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS, M;,NAGEMENT
PLANNING)# SIMULATION* DECISION MAKING, DISASTERS*FALLOUT SHELTERS, TRAINING, DISPLAY SYSTEMS (U)
CONTENTS: A DISCUSSION OF OPERATIONS SIMULATIONANU ITS ROLE AS AN APPLIED RESE ICH TOOL; TME
ESTABLISHMENT OF THL RESEARCH FACILITY AND MODELENVIRONMENTI EMERGENCY ACTIud DECISION EXPERIMENTS;THE SrUUY OF VARIOUS DISPLAY AND SPECIAL SImULATION
EWUIPMENTS* (U)
71
81
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
-%-- --- -- ~
UNCLASSIFIED
UOc REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CUNTROL Not /ZMML7
AU-637 767 15/3 V/2 5/1
SYSTEM UEVELOPMENT CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
DATA PROCESSING FUR LOCAL CIVIL DEFLNSE: ANINVES Ii'ATION OF THE POTENTIALS (IU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: TECHNICAL mEMO,MAY 66 61P CUSACKB. L,
RLpT9 NO. TM(L)-2938/002/OU,
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DLSCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, MANAGEMENTPLANNING), (*DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS, CIVIL DEFENSE,YSTEMS), CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL# DLCISION MAKING,
COMPUTERS, SURVIVAL (U)
AN INVESTIGATION OF THE POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OFELECTRONIC DATA-PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR LOCAL CIVILDEFENSE FUNCTIONSo DIRECTED SPECIFICALLY TOWARD THEVIEaPOIN7 OF THE LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR, THERLPORT PRESENTS THE SYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED TODETERMiINE THE TIME PERIOD(Sj DURING ?lHICH SUCHEWUIPMENTS SHOULD BE USED; POSES QUESTIONS, GIVESANSnERS AND DISCUSSES THE RANGE OF POTENTIALAPPLICATIONS, THE CONSTRAINTS AND CONSIDERATIONS OFINFORMATIUN SYSTEMSt AND MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONALFACTORS; AND, FINALLY RECoMMENDS THE COURSE OF ACTIONTO FOLLuO REGARDING FURTHER RELATED STUDIES.(AUTHOR) (U)
82
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML?
AD-637 90U 5/3 51'INSTITUTE FOR DEFENbE ANALYSES ARLINGTON VA ECONOMIC ANDPOLITICAL STUDIES DIV
U. S. CIVIL DEFENSE BEFORE 1950. THE ROOTS OF PUBLICLAi. 920. (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: SUMMARY REPT.MAY 66 192P JnRDANONEHEMIAH
RLP79 NU. 5TUDY-5-212,IDA/Hm-65-3756
CONTRACT: OCD-0S-63-1 3 9,
UNCLASSIFIEU REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE;
DESCRIPTORS; (#CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, OUNITEO5TATES)s LAW, HISTORY* SOCIAL sCIENCLS,PSYCHOLOGY, PUBLIC OPINION, POLITICAL SCIENCE*MANAGEMENT PLANNING, GREAT BRITAIN, LEADERSHIP,UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT (U)
IDENTIFIERS: KOREA (U)
THE HISTOkIC BACKGROUND OF PUBLIC LAW 92O, THECIVIL DLFENSE ACT OF 1950, IS EXAMINED IN ORDERTO ILLUMINATE THE CAUSES OF THE DIFFICULTIEc NOW
CONFRONTING THOSE CONCERNED WITH NATIONAL CIVILDEFENSE IN THEIR EFFORTS TO ESTABLISH AN OPERATIONALOR POTENTIALLY OPERATIONAL CIVIL DEFENSEORGANIZATION. THE HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY IS THATMANJY OF THESE DIFFICULTIES ARE AN INHERITANCE OF AFURGOTTEN PAST. THE STUDY OF THIS PERIOD SHOWSTHAT MANY OF THE EVENTS LEADING UP TO THE ENACTMENTOF THIS LA4, AS 6ELL AS THE INTENT OF THOSE INVOLVEDIN ITS LEGjISLATION. ARE PROBABLY RADICALLYMISUNDERSTOOD AT PRLSENT. UNDERSTANOING OF EVENTSPRIOR TO THE ENACTMENT UF THE LAA SHEDS MUCh LI4HT ONMANY CURRENT DEFENSL DIFFICULTIES AND, AS SUCH, ISUSEFUL FOR FUTURE PLANNING. (AUTHOR) (U)
83
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
- . - ... .. -7 - I_-_-•_-=
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-639 751 15/3
HUDSON INST INC HARMON-ON-HuDSON N Y
METHODOLOGY FOR POSTATTACK RESEARCH. (U)
DEsCRIPTIvE NOTE: RESEARCH RLPT@,AUG 66 46P AYREbtROBERT Us
REpT, NO. M;-6q7-RR,
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, SCIENTIFICRESEARCH), BEHAVIOR, SOCIOLOGY, RADIATION EFFECTS,NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE (U)
THE REPORT UISCUSSES THE METHODOLOGY OF POSTATTACKRESEARCH. A HIERARCHICAL APPROACH IS DESCRIBED, INWHICH THE OBJECTS OF ANALYSIS RANGE FROM SIMPLEORGWAISMS AND ARTIFACTS TO COMPLEX HUMAN SOCIETIESAND ECOSYSTEMS. THE NOTION OF 'RESPONSEt TO APLRTURBATION AHICH IS APPROPRIATE FOR SIMPLE SYSTEMS1S EXTENDED TO ENCOMPASS THE WIDER NOTION OF'O!SUTILITYI IN DESCRIBIN4 THE LFFECTS OF A NUCLEARATTACK ON THE ECONOMY OR THE SOCIETY OF THE NATION ASA AHOLE. THE APPROPRIATE USES OF DEVICES SUCH ASSCENARIOS, GAMES, CASE HISTORIES, METAPHORS AND
OOELS FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES IS OISCUSPED@ THEMAJOR POINT IS THAT NON-RIGuROU$ CONSTRUCTS MAY BEEXTREMELY HELPFUL IN TRAINING. RAISING THE LEVEL OFTHE DISCUSSION, AND GENERATING INSIbHTS, BUT CANNOT
BE uSED FOR PREDICTIVE PURPOSES AS MODELS CAN* A9STAT1-'F-TmE-ARTf ESTIMATE OF VARIOUS MODELS I1INCLUDED, (AUTHOR) (U)
84
UNCLASSIFIED /7MML7
womm- a
UNCLASSIFIED
'DC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEAR(H C-_NTROL NO* /ZMML7
AU-64U 206 15/4
FLOLRAL AVIATION AGENCY hASHINGTON U C
DEFLNSE RLADINEbS: bELECTED REFERENCES. (U)
MAR 6' 42P
RLPT. NO. dIBLIOGRAPHIC LIST-Ili
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS,
bIBLIOGRAPIIES), CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL,
TRAINING, FALLOUT SHELTERS, COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS,
TRANSPORTATION, PUBLIC HEALTH* PSYCHOLOGY,
MEUICINE, RADIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION, RAVIATION
MONITORS, UECONTAMINA T ION, CIVIL AVIATION,
SURVIVAL, AGRICULTURL, INDUSTRIES (U)
85
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
UOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CCNTROL Nu. /ZMML7
AU-641 989 5/1u 15/3
SIMULMATICS CORP NEW YORK
CRISIS LEVEL ANI CIVIL DEFENSE ATTITUDES* (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,MAY 66 63P POPKIN,SAMUEL L,
TASK: 4b83A
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTONS: (OATTITUDESt OCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),PUBLIC OPINION, PSYCHOMETRICS, ANALYSIS OFVARIANCE, nARFARE (U)
CUMPARATIVE SURVEY ANALYSIS WAS USED TO RELATEPUBLIC OPINIONS AdoUT CIVIL DEFENSE TO THE LEVELLF INTERNATIONAL TENSION. TiELVE CLUSTERS OFSIMILAR QUESTIONS FROM NATIUNAL SURVEYS TAKEN BETWEEN195 ANo 1964 WERE ANALYZED TO DETERMINE IF THEREWLRE ANY SIGNIFICANT VARIATIONS BET*EEN SURVEYS THAT
CODLD BE ACCOUNTED FOR BY C4ANGES IN THE LEVEL OFINTERNATIONAL TENSION. CLUSTERS MOST SIGNIFICANTLYRELATED TU THE TENSION LEVEL WERE IMMINLNCE OFWAR AND HOME PREPARATIONS FOR ATTACK. IN
GLNERAL IT IS CONCLUDED THAT IT OFTEN IS MOREIMPORTANT TO HAVE HIGH CONTINUITY BETWEEN SURVEYS INQuESTIOkS ASKED AND TO HAVE HIGH FLEXIBILITY IN THETIMING JF SURVEYS, (AUTHOR) (U)
86
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /LMML 7
AD-6'•4 1% 15/3 5/iHUUION INST INC HARMON-ON-HUDSON N Y
MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE
PROGRAMS@ (U)
DcSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,SEP 64 36P ROCKETTFREDLRICK C, I
RLpT. NO, HI- 6 12-RRTASK: 14 21I-C
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSt *MANAGEMENT
ENGINELRING), SURVIVAL, SPECIFICATIONS, MANAGEMENT
PLANNING, LCONOMICS, RECOVERY (U)
MANAGINPREPARATIONS FOR CIVIL DEFENSE IS
SLEN AS A MAJOR TASK REQUIRING PEACETIME
pREPARATIONS* CONSIUERABLE MANA(aEMENT FLEXIBILITYPUULD BE REQUIRED BECAUSE CIVIL DEFENSE PREPARATIONSHAVE SEVERAL POTENTIAL PROGRAMS* BEYOND SURVIVALMEASURES THERE ARE SUCH POSSIBLE CRISIS PROGRAMS ASRLCOVERy, WELFARE, AND COMMAND AND CONTROL. EACH
CRISIS PROGRAM MIGHT HAVE SEVERAL VERSIONS *ITH
DIFFERENT IMPLEMENTATION TIMES AND MEASURES,
CRISIS CONDITIONS COULD AFFECT THE FEASIBILITY OFCRISIS PROGRAMS ADDING TO THE REQUIREMENT FORFLEXIBILITY, IN PLANNING THE MANAGEMENT OF CRISISCIVIL DEFLNSE EFFORTS, OVER.ALL IMPizEMENTATIONSTRATEGIES MIGHT HAVE VALUE, THREE IMPLEMENTATIONSTRATEGIES ARE OISCUSSEO. (AUTHOR) (U)
87
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
1...7 .. . .• ?• • .. .• -E •
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /LMML7
AU-6'$3 ?19 15/3 S/l1PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
CIVIL DEFENSE AND SCCIETY, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOIE: INTERIM REpT,,JUN 63 263P NEHNEVAJSAJIRI
CONTRACT: OCU-05-62- 2 6 7
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
OLSCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSIEMS,
EFFECTIVENESS), (05OCIOLOGI, CIVIL DEFENSESYSTLMS), PROBABILITY, COSTS, PU6LIC OPINION,DECISION MAKING, SURVIVAL, ENVIRONMENT,
COMPATIBILITY, DISARMAMENT, DETERRENCE, COLD6A'<, STRLSS(PSYCHOLOGY), FEDERAL BUDGETS, ARMS
CONTROL (U)
FIRST OF ALL, THE AUTHOR CONSIDERS PROBLEMS OFEFFECTIVENESS OF ANY CIVIL uEFENSE PROGRAMSTHIS HAS TO DO 6ITH THE CAPABILITY OF A PR"GRAM TO
ATTAIN, TO A REASONABLE DEGREE, ITS OWN OBJECTiVESesECONDLY, HE LOOKS AT THE IMPACT OF CIVIL
DEFENSE UPON THE COLD NAR. THESE, AS IT
WERE, ARE EFFECTS WHICH WE MAY BUY 6Y ADOPTING
MEASURES TO PROTECT OUR POPuLATION. THEY HAVE TO
DO ,,ITH THE FACT THAT SOME NATIONAL RESOURCES MAy
HAVE TO BE DIVERTED FROM OTHER PROGHAMS; THAT
CONFLICT bET'EEN PEACE AND OAR-PREPARATIONS MAY EXISTIN REALITY, OR IN PERCEPTIONS OF PEOPLE (COGNITIVEDISSONANCE PROBLEM); THAT CIVIL DEFENSE MAY
CONTRIBUTE TO DETERRENCE EITHER DIRECTLY OR THROUGH
ITS EFFECT UPON CREDIBILiTY OF USE OF NI;CLEARALAPONS; THAT IT MAY INCREASE TmE PROSPECTS FOR WARe
THIRDLY, HE CONSIDERS THE EFFECTS OF CIVIL
DEFENSE UPON AMERICANS AND uPON THt 4i4dTuRE OF OURSOCIETY. THESE AR. KEY STANuARDS AGAINST WHICH THE
FLASIBILITY, WORTH, AND MEANING OF ALTERNATIVE
PROQRAM5 HAVE TO bE EVALUATtD. (U)
98
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
- ~-* ___00,60
o
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CoNTROL NO. /ZMML7
Au- 6'4 619 15/3SYSrEM DEVELOPMENT CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
A STATE CIVIL DEFENSE TRAININb PLAN: AN ORGANIZATION
AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH STUDY. (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: TECHNICAL MEMO.,SEP 66 3'45P bORDONJ, Js IBUSTYA,C,
STREICH,E, Re IREPT. NO. TM-3099/OOU/01
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPID•S; (*CIVIL DEFL14SE SYSTEMS, TRAINING),(*CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL, INSTRUCTION MANUALS),MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING, DISASTER$, FIRES, SYSTEMSENGINEERINc3 , FIRE SAFETy, WARFARE (U)
A FULLY DETAILEO ANU COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION OFSTATE CIVIL DEFENSE TRAININGo IT INCLUDES A SURVEYOF bTATES, 6HICM *AS UNDERTAKEN TO DETERMINE THEARRAY OF DIFFERENT STATE AGENCY ORGANIZATiONALSTRUCTURES. USING IT AS A BASIS, SPECIFIC STATESAERE SELECTED FOR INTENSIVE STUDY AND,DATACCLLECTION. UTILIZING THE DATA OBTAINED, ANANALYSIS OF THE EMERGENCY TASKS OF EACM STATE A(AENCYIS PERFORMED, TRAINING REwUIREMENTS SPECIFIED,PERSONNEL TO BE TRAINED DESIGNATED, AND TRAININGMETHODS DESCRIBED, IN ADDITION ALTERNATIVETRAININ., PROBLEMS BASED UPON DIFFERENT FUNDING ANDTIMIN(i ASSUMPTIONS ARE PROPOSED AND EXAMINE31 A
'CRISIS PREPARATION# PROGRAM IS DESCRIBED; AND ASPECIFIC EXAMPLE OF EMERGENcY SFRVICE TRAINING USINGTHE FIRE SERVICE IS OUTLINED. FINALLY, SUGGESTIONSFOR FURTHER RESEARCH ARE PRESENTED, (U)
89
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
-o o-I -:
A4r-~- Z -E E - - OM- M05
UlC LASSIFIED
ODC REPORT BIRLIOGkAPHY SEARCH CONTROL N,)# /ZMML7
AO-646 1SO 15/3 5/9STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
OLCUPATIONAL SKILLS AND CIVIL DEFENSE, (U)
SEP 66 82P UROWNiSTEPHEN L.PROj: SRI-MIU-4949-35U
UNCLASSIFIE) mEPOCT
DESCRIPTORS: (-CIViL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, MANPOWERSTUDIES), (0EMPLOYMENT, INDUSTRILS), J08 ANALYSIS,6AdOR, INDUSTRIAL PLANTS@ POPULATION, SURV;VAL,TECmNICIANS, CLASSIFICATION, SAMPLING, CIVILIANPERSONNEL, INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH (U)
DETAILED KNOALEDGE OF LOCAL DISTRIBUTIONS OFINDuSTRIAL SKILLS AND NATIONWIDE PATTERNS OFEMPLOYMENT IS U-EFUL PREATTACK IN ANALYZINGINDUSTRIAL VULNERABILITY ANG POSTATTACK IN ALLOCATINGLAb.R RESOURCES, A METHOD FOR ESTIMATINGOCCJPATION-INDUSTRY DISTRIBuTION, BY CENSUS TRACT, ISPROPOSED AND USED IN A HYPOTHETICAL ATTACK ON SANJOSe, CALIFORNIA, TO INVESTIGATE SELECTIVESURVIVAL UF OCCuPATIONAL. SKILLS, A MATRIX OFOCCUPATIONS, BY INDUSTRY, IS PRESENTED FOR THE ENTIREUNITED STATES, ThE TYPES UF ANALYSES T.AT CANBE UNDERTAKEN USING THE "ATkIX ARý .ISCUSSEo,(A.T,'OR) (U)
90
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
W •w - - - K
UNCLASSIFIED
DoC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AO-6ý6 996 5/10 15/3 13/13SIMAULMATICS CORP CAMBRIDGE MASS
EVA6UATION OF COMMUNITY RESPONSE To FPH5PHO4RAMo (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT., 14 MAR-30 DEC 66aUEC 66 56P POOLITHIEL DE SOLA IYATES,
JULES D. ftESTLAKEtM I
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DLSCRIPTORS: (*ATTITUDES$ OCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)$
PUBLIC OPINION, IiUESTIONNAIRES, HOUSING,dUILDINGSt FALLOUT SHELTERS, ShIELDING,PSYCHOMETRICS, REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY) (U)
IDENTIFIERS: EVALUATION (U)
TAO SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED TO EVALUATE THE RESPONSEIN RHODE ISLAND TO A QUESTIONNAIRE ONEVALUATION OF FALLOUT PROTECTION IN HOMES.(FPHS) RECEIPT OF THE FPm5 WUESTIONNAIRE DID NOT
SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE ATTtTUDES TO*ARD CIVIL DEFENSEPROGRAMs, NOR DID IT RAISE THE LEVEL OF ANXIETY INTHE COMMUNITY. RECEIPT OF REPLIES TO THEHOUSEHOLDERS' RESPONSES (*{.CM PRECEDED THE SECOND
SURVEY) DID RAISE THE LEVEL OF AWARENESS ABOUT
CIVIL DEFENSE, WITODUT 5!6NIFICANTLY CHANGING THELEVEL OF ANXIETY OR CHANGING THE ACTIVITY OFHOUSEHOLDERS WITH REGARD TO A FALLOUT SHELTERpROGRAM. THE FPHS QUESTIONNAIRE PROGRAM, WHILEUSEFUL IN ELICITING INFORMATION# CANNOT BY ITSELFSERVE TO ENCOURAGE ACTION (TO ANY USEFUL DEGREE)
?'Y THE PUBLIC WITH REGARD TO FALLOUT SHELTERS.
(AUTHOR) (U)
91
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMNL?
UNCLASSIFiED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-647 -OU 18/N 15/3 1GAUTNEY AND jONES COMMUNICATIONS INC WASHINGTONs D C
INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF AN AUTOMATIC . OTERADIOLOGICAL MONITORING SYSTEM. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL NEPT.,jUL 66 127P HARRIESWILLIAM So |mETZLER9
ROBERT Et ILA*SONsMELVIN Ee s JR;
RLpTo NO* TR-66.020|0O03
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
ODtScRIPTORS; (*RADIATION MONITORS, AUTOMATIC),TELEMETER SYSTEMS, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, DATATRANSMISSION SYSTEMS# REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEMS (U)
AN AUTOMATIC REMOTE RADIOLOGICAL MONITORINGSYSTEM OHICH WAS DEVELOPED aAS INSTALLED IN ACOMMUNITY AND TESTED FOR OPERATIONAL CHARACTERiSTICS.THE SYSTEM AS DELIVERED WAS CAPABLE OF BEINGOPERATEO VIA LANDLINE TELEMETRY LINKS BUTCONSIDERABLE ENGINEERING EFFORT WAS REQUIREo TOEFFECT AN INTERFACE WITH A VHF RADIO LINK.EXTENSIVE MODIFICATION OF BOTH THE BASE $TATION ANDREMOTE STATION TRANSCEIVERS AS *ELL AS lliL MONITORINGEQUIPMENT WAS PERFORMED* WHEN THE RADIO TELEMETRYPROBLEMS HAD BEEN SOLVED, THE SYSTEM WAS DEPLOYED INMONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND. WHICH COMPRISES ANAREA OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE HUNDRED SQUARE MILES.THE UNITS AERE INSTALLED ON COUNTY SCHOOLPROPERTIES DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE COUNTYt ANDTHE DEPLOYMENT PATTERN INCLUDES PATH LENGTHS RANGINGFROM THREE AND ONE HALF TO FIFTEEN AND ONE HALF MILESOVER ROLLING TERRAIN* TELEMETRY MODES SUCCESSFULLYEMPLOYED IN THE INSTALLATION INCLUDE TWO VHF SINGLEFREQUENCY RADIO LINKSj SIX STANDARD LEASED LANDLINELINKS, ONE COMBINATION LEASED LANDLINE - BELLSYSTEM AUDIO CARRIER LINK AND ONE COMBINATIONLEASED LANDLINE - DUPLEX MICROWAVE LINK. THESYSTEM IS NO OPERATIONAL AND IS CURRENTLY BEINGEVALUAtED, UNDER A SEPARATE CONTRACT, FOREFFECTIVENESS IN ITS PRESENT FORM AND FORIMPROVEMENTS IN RELIABILITY AND OPERABILITY THAT MAYBE INCORPORATED IN FUTURE SYSTEMS. (AUTHOR) (U)
92
UNCLASSIFIED /ZML?7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AD-649 5'43 1,S/3 /PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
AMERICAN' VIEWS ON CIVIL DEFENSE IN THE COLD WARCONTEXT: 1966. (U;
DESCRIPTIVE NOTEI SUMMARY REPT.,DEC 66 154P NEHNEVAJSAsjIRI I
CONTRACT; OCD-OS-63' 1 8 , NSFoG-1I309
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; (*COLD *AR, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),(*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLIC OPINION),POPULATION9 ATTITUDESs DISASTERS, FALLOUTSHELTERS, NUCLEAR *EAPONS, PROBABILITY,SAMPLING (U)
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT IS TO EXAMINEAMERICANS' VIEWS ON CIVIL DEFENSE IN THE 1966 COLDWAR CONTEXT FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE FUNDAMENTALPATTERNS AND MEANINGS OF ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATIONAND FROM THE POINT OF VIE* OF EVALUATING SPECIFICITEMS OF INFORMATION. THE 1966 DATA WERE OBTAINEDFROM A NATIONAL SAMPLE OF 1,497 AMERICANSINTERVIEWED IN FEBRUARY AND MARCH, 1966. IN
MANY CASES, DATA ARE PRESENTED *ITm COMPARABLE DATAFHOM PREVICUS STUDIES. THERE IS A FORM OF'NATIONAL CONSENSUS,' AlTm STABILITY OVER TiME, INSUPPORT OF CIVIL DEFENSE, AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TOIDENTIFY ANY PARTICULAR SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION WHOEXPRESS NEGATIVE SENTIMENTS. THE BASIC CONSISTENCYIN POSITIVE ATTITUDES APPARENTLY HAS NOT BEENAFFECTED BY FLUCTUATIONS IN THE INTERNATIONALENVIRONMENT. CHANGES IN THE NATION#S ADMINiSTRATIONqOR SHIFTS IN SOVIET LEADERSHIP. NOR HAVE MAJORSHIFTS IN THE CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS THEMSELVESAFFECTED THE NATIONAL SENTIMENT. AMERICANS ARECONVINCED THAT SURVIVAL ODDS WOULD BE GREAyLYENHANCED FOR A SHELTERED POPULATION. THE SHELTERA5SIGNMENT NOTION MEETS WITH VERY LITTLE NEGATIVEFEELING. T"E HOME SHELTER SURVEY IDEA IS VERY WELLRLCEIVED. AMERICANS SEE A SIGNIFICANT ROLE FORCIVIL DEFENSE IN NATURAL DISASTER AND OTHER EMERGENCYSITUATIONS, WHILE AMERICANS DO NOT CONSIDERCIVIL DEFENSE TO BE AMONG THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMSFACINA THE NATION, AMONG PROGRAMS COMPETING BEFORECO, .,-S FOR FINANCIAL SUPPORT, CIVIL DEFENSE ISSE. , ONLY TO HIGHER EDUCATION AND NATIONAt HEALTHPROGRAMS, (U)
93UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No@ /LMML7
AU-649 835 13/2 5/1 15/3PLANNING RESEARCH CORP LOS ANGELES CALIF
IMPLEMENTkTION OF AN ORDEREu SPRAWL URBANCONFIGURATION* (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,JAN 67 226P BLUNTKEITH Re ILIFETER,
JOEL J, ;VANDAAMPETER IREpTe NO* PRC 0-1219
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH
STANFORD RESEARCH INST., MENLO PARK, CALIF.CONTRACT OCO-PS-6'-201,
DLSCRIPTORS: (*URBAN AREAS, CONFIGURATION),(*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, URBAN AREAS), URBANPLANNING, PASSIVE DEFENSE, COSTS, POPULATION.TRANSPORTATION, FEASIBILITY sTuDIES, MANAGEMENTEN61NEERING (U)
THIS STUDY IS THE THIRD PHASE OF A RESEARCH EFFORTCONCERNED hITH TvE ROLE OF URBAN FOmM AS A PASSIVEDEFENSE VARIABLE* ITS PURPOSE IS To CONSIDER HOf0THE PHYSICAL CONFIULiRATIONS OF EXISTING URBAN AREASMIGHT BE HODIFIED IN ORDER TO BRING THEM IN CLOSERAPPROXIMATION TO A VECENTRALIZEO 'ORDERED SPRA*L'ARRANGEMENT FOUND IN THE !NITIAL PHASE OF THE *ORK TcBE OPTIMAL IN TERMS OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND DEFENSECONSIDERATIONS* ATTENTION I1 FOCUSED ON THREEMAJOR SUBJECT AREAS; TECHNIOUES FOR IMPLEMENTINGURBAN DECENTRALIZATION# MAJOR PROBLEMS LIKELY TO BEENCOUNTERED IN OECENTRALIZATION EFFORTS, AND CONTROLPROCESSES THROUGH WHICH CONFIGUkATIONAL MODIFICATIONSWUULD HAVE TO BE IMPOSED. IN COMPARING ORDEREDSPRAWL WITH CONVENTIONAL URbAN FORMS, IT *AS FOUNDTHAT CONTROL OF INTERCOMMUNITY OPEN SPACE WOULD BETHE CRITICAL ELEMENT IN ACHIEVING METROPOLITANDECENTRALIZATION* WHILE TECHNIQUES CURRENTLYAVAILABLE FOR GUIOING URBAN LANO-USE DECISIONSCONSTITUTE A SUUND FOuNuATION OF CONTROL FORIMPLEMENTING DECENTRALIZATION, THEY WOULD HAVE TO BEADMINISTERED ON AN AREA-WIDE BASIS AND SUPPLEMENTEDBY VARIOUS INDIRECT CONTROLS* 0H1LE PLANNING FORDECENTRALIZATION *OULD HAVE TO OCCUR WJTHIN AMETROPOLITAN FRAMEWORK, THE URBAN PLANNING FUNCTIONIS CURRENTLY CONDUCTED LARGELY AT THE MUNICIPALLLVEL; THE PROBLEM HERE COULD BE RESOLVED BYASSIGNING RESPONSIBILITY FOh DECENRALIZATION
PLANNING TO THE METROPOLITAN TIER# IC 4
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT dIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /lMML7
AU-651 o09 5/11IOWA STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY ANDANTHROPOLOGY
SYSTEM LINKAGES AMONG WOMENS ORGANIZATIONS: AN
EXPLORATORY STUDY OF MEMBERSHIP AND LEADERSHIPLINKAGES AMONG oOMENOS FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS IN A
LOCAL COMMUNITY* (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT,,67 l13P dEALoGEORGe Me IKLONaLANI
GERALD Eo :YARBROUGHIPAUL IBOHLENvjOE H. I
DILLMANDON At IREpTo NO* RURAL SOCIOLOGY-'2PROJ: 01-4'3-26-73-1529TASK: 81I1-E
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; (*ORGANIZATIONS, *SOCIAL SCIENCES),LEADERSHIP, SOCIOLOGY. FEMALES, HUMANS, CIVILDEFENSE SYSTEMSs ATTITUDES# bEHAVIORq SOCIAL
PSYCmOLOGYt RURAL AREAS tUl
THE LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR IS
CONCEPTUALIZED AS A CHANGE AGENT WITH THE TASK OFINSTIGATING SOCIAL CHAN4E* IN LOCAL COMMUNITIES
VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS@ CONCEPTUALIZED AS SOCIALsYSTEMS# ARE POTENTIAL RESOURCES WHICH A CHANGE AGENT
MAY UTILIZE IN VARIOUS WAYS TO INSTIGATE SOrIALCHANGE* THE VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS IN A SINGLELOCAL COMMUNITY HAVE VARIOUS RELATIONSHIPS EXTANTBETWEEN THEM *HICM MAY IMPINGE UPON ATTEMPTs TO
INVO&VE THEM IN SOCIAL CHANGE EFFORTS* ONE OFTHESE RELATIONSHIPS IS THAT OF STRUCTURAL SySTEMLINKAGE, Io.E OVERLAPPING MEMBERSHIPS %ITH OR *ITHOUTACCOMPANYING LEADERSHIP RESPONSIBILITIES ORQUALITIES. FOUR TYPES OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
LINKAGES ARE ANALYZED IN THIS REPORTI MEMBER TOMEMdER LINKAGE, MEMBER TO OFFICER LINKAGE, MEMBER TOONGINIZATIONAL INFLUENTIAL LINKAGE AND MEMBER TOCOMMUNITY INFLUENTIAL LINKA6E, DEFINITE PATTERNSOF mEMBER TO MEMBER LINKAGES ANL MEMBER TO LEADER
LINKAGES EXISTED AMONG THE %I STUDY ORGANIZATIONS.CLUSTERS OF ORGANIZATIONS WERE DELINEATED ON THEBASIS OF THE PATTERNING OF MEMBER TO MEMBER LINKAGES,THE PATTERNS OF MEMBER TO LEADER LINKAGES DIFFERED
FROm THAT OF THE MEMBER TO MEMBER LINKAGES.
(u)95
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMeL7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDc REPORT BIBLIUGkAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-651 167 15/1PITTSBURGH UNIV PA UEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
cOST AND FINANCING OF CIVIL DEFLNSE; SOME PUBLICVIE.,Ss (U)
FEd 67 77P COLEMAN&ALAN No
CONTRACT: VAHCZO6-7-C-Oj12t NSF 4113U 9
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ECONOMICS)aCOSTS, FALLOUT SHELTERS, PUBLIC OPINION (U)
THE REPORT ATTEMPTS TO BRING TOUETHER, FROM ANUmdER OF NATIOtAL AND COMMuNITY STUDIES, TwE RESULTSREGARDING THE AIHERICAN PUBLICOS VIE*S ON THE COSTAND FINANCING OF CIVIL DEFENSE MEASURES AND PRO4RAMS#GIVEN THE LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY T HE NUMBER ANDDIVERSITY OF THE STUDIES USED, THE FOLLOWINGGENLRALIZATIONS OBTAINED; (1) INCREASING CIVILDEFENSE EXPENDITURES IN GENERAL IS bELIEVEDDESIRABLE; (2) MANY CITIZENS ARE UNCERTAIN ABOUTWHAT FALLOUT PROTECTION SHOULD COST; (3) PERSONALASSUMPTION OF THE TOTAL OR EVEN PARTIAL COST FOR
FAMILY SHELTERS IS NOT FAVORED; (') MAJOR i
ObJECTIONS TO FAMILY FALLOUT SHELTERS INVOLVE COST?(!, FAVORABILITY OF PUBLIC AS WELL AS FAMILYFALLOUT SHELTERS IS INCREASED WHEN FEDERAL OR STATEFINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IS INCLUDED: (6) ASUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THE CITIZENRY FAVORS A TAXREDUCTION OR EXEMPTION FOR sHELTERS; (7) INrIRECTINDUCEMENTS FOR BUILDING SHELTERS GENERALLY MEET THE
APPROVAL OF THE PUBLICI (8) SPECIFIED ALTERNATIVEMETHODS OF FINANCING SHELTERS HAVE BEEN MET WITHDISAPPROVAL OR UNCERTAINTY? (9) PUBLIC SHELTERSARE VIEWED AS EFFECTIVE AND WORTH THE COST; (10)AMONG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS, EDUCATION AND HEALTH RANKAHEAD OF CIVIL DEFENSE MEASuRES, AND VERY FEW PEOPLECURRENTLY AGREE THAT CIVIL DEFENSE MONIES WOULD BEBETTER SPENT ON MISSILES AND BOMBERS. THE MAJORITYOF THE STUDIES UTILIZED WERE CONDUCTED IN TmE EARLY
196U'S--A TIME OHEN THE FAMILY SHELTER CONTROVERSYREACHED IT APEX, GENERAL coST AND FINANCING ISSUESAND ALTERNATIVES HAVE NOT BEEN PROBED EXTENSIVELY IN
NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SUgVLYS. (AUTHOR) (U)
96
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMM&7
UNCLASSIFIED
iDoC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
AD-653 466 5/11 IS/3HUMAN SCIEN(CES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN VA
KINSHIP AND VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATION IN POS'-THERMONUCLEAR ATTACK SOCIETY: SOME EXPLORATORYSTUDIES, (U)
SEP 65 338P GREERSCOTT As |*INCm,
ROBERT F.REPT. NO. iSR-RR-65/1-CRCONTRACT: OCo-OS-63-"14
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: PREPARED IN COOPERATION *!THNORTH*ESTERN UNIV@t EVANSTON, ILL., CENTER FnRMETROPOLITAN STUDIES* SEE ALSO AD0653 q6os
DESCRIPTORS: (*SOCIOLOGY2 UNITED STATES),(*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS9 SOCiOLOQYl, SOCIALPSYCHOLOGYt ORGANIZATIONS, URBAN AREAS,vULNERABILITY# DISASTERS, SOCIAL SCIENCEStRECOVERY. STATISTICAL DATA,REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY)f POPULATIONs BEHAVIOR,SURVIVAL, NUCLEAR WARFARE (U)
IDENTIFIERS: POST ATTACK OPERATIONS, FAMILIES (U)
THE INCIDLNCE OF FAMILY-KINSHIP AND VOLUNTARYORGANIZATIONAL PATTERNS IN CONTEMPORARY UNITEDSTATES SOCIETY ARE EXAMINED, MANY PHIMARY FAMILYUNITS, COMPOSED OF PARENTS-IMMEDIATE CHILDREN(#NUCLEAR FAMILIES#;, HAVE TIES WITH RELATIVESOUTSIDE THE NUCLEAR FAMILY, WHICH SUGGESTS THEEXISTENCE OF PATTERNS OF EXTENDED FAMILISM AND OFKINSHIP NETVORKS, PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARYORGANIZATIONS IS A WIDELY PERVASIVE FEATURE OFAMERICAN SOCIETY, OFFERING A MAJOR LEVEL AND FOCUS
OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION AND ACTION.PARTICIPATION IN BOTH KINSHIP RELATIONS AND
VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS WAS FOUND TO VARY ON SEVERALDIMENSIONS# KINSHIP RELATIONS VARY MOST STRONGLYBY 'ETHNICITYI--HEASURED aY THE RELIGIOUS, CULTURAL#AND/OR RACIAL BACKGROUND OF THE FAMILY.DIFFERENCES IN PATTERNS OF KINSHIP AND VOLUNTARY IORGANIZATION TEND TO BE ASSOCIATED *ITH DIFFERENCESAMONG SOCIAL AREAS WHICH CAN BE DESCRIBED WITHIN THEPHYSICAL SPACE FORMED BY METROPOLITAN COMMUNITIES*SEVERAL PROPOSITIONS ARE FORMED. RELATING MASS DATAFOR AMERICAN CITIES AND THE ASSOCIATIONAL NETWORKSOF LOCALITIES* (1) THERE ARE CONSTANTRELATIONSHIPS BET*EEN SUB-POPULATION TYPES ANDPARTICIPATION IN THE LOCAL AREA AS A COMMUNITY, (U)
97UNCLASSIFIED /ZM4L7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-65' 201 15/3 5/10HUiMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN VA
SPECIAL PROSLEMb OF CHILDREN IN CIVIL DEFENSE
PLANNINGo iU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,oFEB 67 5SP LUTZFRANK 0.
RLpT. NO. MSR-RR-67/3-CR
CONTRACT: OCS-05"63"11HTASKI 43218
UNCLASSIFIEO REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (ODISASTERSt *CiLDREN)i NUCLEAwfiARFAREo CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, SHELTERS9EDUCATIONt MANAGEMENT PLANNINGs
ADJUSTMENT(PSYCHOLOGY)t SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,
c.ROUP DYNAMICS. 8EHAVIOR ,U)
IDENTIFIERS: ORPHANS (U)
THE STUDY IS A LIMITED RESEARCH EFFORT WHIC.
ADDRESSES FOUR KINDS OF QUESTIONS OF POTENTIALINTEREST TO THE CIVIL DEFENSE PLANNER. (1)
WHAT EFFECTS ON CHILDREN CAN dE OBSERVED WHICH ARE
ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE EXISTENCE OF THE THREAT OR
POSSIBILITY OF NUCLLAR OAR. (2) WHAT IS KNON
ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF DISASTER AND FAMILY DISRUPTIONON CHILDRLN WHICH MIGHT HAVE SI4NIFICANCE FOR CIVILDEFENSE PLANNING, (3) *HAT 1S KNOWN ABOUT
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE CARE OF ORPHANS.(At) WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE USES OF SCHOOLS IN
SHELTER SYSTEMS AND WHAT ARE THE CONSIDERATIONS
INvULVEuo AvAILABLE EVIDENCE RELATED TO EACH OFTHESE GENERAL QUESTIONS IJ REVIEWED AND DISCUSSED.
THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS WERE SUMMARIZED INRELATION TO THREE COMPONENTS OF CIVIL DEFENSEPLANNING: (1) EDUCATION AND INFORMATION;(2) SHELTER SYSTEM PLANNING; (3) POST-ATTACKORPHAN CARE. (AUTHOR) (U)
93
UNCLASSIFIED iZPML7
UNCLASSIFIEDDDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /lMML7
-65'4 S 78 1/3HUDSON INST INC HARMONwON-HUDSON N Y
CkIISI CIVIL DEFENSE AND DEiERRENCE9 (U)
APR 67 asP ROCKETTFREDERICK C. IRLpT* NO. MI-777/2-RR
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTwuS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *USSR).(or-.STERN EUROPE, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),.CHII.A, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)i DETERRENCE,
NATIONAL DEFENSE, UNITED STATES, TRANSPORTATION#EVACUATION, URBAN ARLAS, FALLOUT SHELTERS*SURVIVAL, INDUSTRIL5P VULNERABILITYe RECOVERY (U)
THE RTPORT EAAMINES THE POTENTIAL OF YHE SOVIETUNIGON CHINA, AND SOME EvKOPEAN NATIONS FORREDUCING THEIR VULNERABILITY TO NUCLEAR ATTACKTHROUGH EHERGENCY CIVIL DEFENSE MEASURES TAKEN DURING
AN INTENSE CRISIS. IT IS ARGUED THAT THIS CDPOTENTIAL BY SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCING THE NUMBER OFHOSTAGES AND PROVIDING AN IMPROVED QECOVERYCAPABILITY, HAS SOME IMPLICATION$ rOR U.S.OLTERRENCE POLICY. THUSl IF DETERRENCE POLICY ISTHOueHT TU REQUIRE A LARSt NUMBER OF URBAN wOSTAGES,IT MAY NEED TO BE REVIEWED IN LIGHT OF THE ADOVEPOSSIBILITY. A SURVEY OF THE CD POLICIES ANDCAPABILITIES OF THE ABOVE COUNTRIES SUGGESTS THAT APRIMARY CRISIS CD MEASURE COULD BE AN URBANEVALUATION TO EXPEDIENT OR IMPROVISED FALLOUTPROTECTION. IN ADDITION, IN SOME CRISIS ENOUuHTIME MIGHT BE AV4ILAGLE TO MOVE SOME PERSONALpROPERTY AND PERHflPS SOME CRITICAL INDUSTRIALRESJURCES OUT OF THE MORE LIKELY TARGET AREAS.(AUTHOR) (U)
99
UNCLASSIFIED Z4L
UNCLA5SIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO, /ZMML7
AD-6E5 530 15/6 18/1 15/3STAtIFO.RD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
METMLDOLOGY FOR ASSESSING TOTAL VULNERABILITY, (U)
AUG 66 176P DRESCHFRANCjS 6, IELLIS#HAZEL I
PROJ: SRI-MU-4949-520
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
ULSCRIPTORS: (*VULNERABILITy, *SYSTEMSENGINEERING), (*NUCLEAR WARFARE# *THLRMONUCLEARREACTIONS), ECONOMICSo SOCIOLOGY, POLITICALSCIENCE, CULdJREl ATTITUUES, INDUSTRIES,NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, LABOR UNIONS, LANGUAGE,SEMANTICs, UNITED STATES GOVERNMLNT,INTERACIIONS, INPUT-OUTPUT DEVICES, CIVIL DEFENSLSYSTLMS (U)
THE STUDY *AS AN ATTEMPT T' APPLY SYSTEMS ANALYSISTO THE STU:,f OF TOTAL VULNERABILITY. THE RESULTSINDICATED THAT THE SYSTEMS CONCEPT COULD BE USED TOGENERATE, THROUGH AN EXPANSIBLE SEQUENCE OF CHECKLISTS, MANY PERTINENT QUESTIONS ABOUT THE STRUCTUREOF OUR SOCIETY AND ITS INTRINSIC VULNERABILITIES*THE ANALYSIS WAS CENTERED ON THE INDIVIDUAL As APOLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC AGENT AND 23 PRIMARYINSTITUTIONS THAT INTERACT *ITH HIM AND WITH EACHOTHER* THE FIRST STEP WAS TO IDENTIFY AS WELL ASPUSSIB&. ALL INPUT AND OUTPUT VARIABLES FOR THEINDIVIDUAL AND THE INSTITUTIONS, ANU ALL THv SOURCESOF EACH INPUT AND ALL THE DESTINAT!ONS FOR EACHOUTPUT. LXECUTION oF THIS STEP ENCOUNTERED MANYCONCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC DIFFICULTIES, AND MADE ITQUITE CLEAR THAT INITIAL POPES DF INVESTIGATINGPOSSIBLE INTER-RELATIONSHIPS QUANTITATIVEky *ERE OVEROPTIMISTIC OR PREMATURE* THE SYSTEMS DESCRIPTIONSWERE RELATED TO THE PRIMARY kND SECONDARY EFFEiCTS OFTHERMONuCLEAR ATTACK* THEY wERE COMPARED W:TH tORETRAUITIONAL DESCRIPTIONS OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND WITHTWO SIMPLIFIED POSTATTACK SrENARIGs REPRESENT!NG THEpRIMARY EFFECrS OF A HEAVY COUNTER FORCE AND A HEAVYCOUNTER INDUSTRY ATTACK* (AUTHOR) (U)
o00
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /-EMML7
AD-651 812 Ib/3 9/; 5/2STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
EOC DATA D!SPLAY SYSTEM, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT,,MAY 6' 220P METZLERROBERT E. ILAWSON,
MELVIN E 9 .JR1
TASK; 29
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
StipPLEMENTARY NOTE: PREPARED IN COOPERATION *ITH GAUTNEYAND JONES COMMUNICATIONS, !NC., NASHINGTON, Uo.,s REPT, NO. TR-67.U220,L3.
DLSCRIPTORS: ($DISPLAY SYSTEMS, *CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS), DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS, INFORMATIONRETRIEVAL* CONTROL pANELS9 ENVIRONMENTs DATA,
LOGIC CIRCUITS, COLORS (U)
SAN EOC DATA, DISPLAY SYSTEM, DESIGNED TORECORD, STORE AND DISPLAY A WIDE VARIETY OF DATAl WASDEVELOPED AND FABRICATED. THE SYSTEM CONSISTS OF ACENTRALIZED CONTROL CONSOLE AND TWO WALL-HUNG DISPLAYPANELS. THE CONSOLE CONTAINS LOGIC AND MEMORYCIRCUITS FOR DATA STORAGE AND RETRIEVALs AND ACONTROL PANEL FOR EACH OF THE DISPLAY PANELS, DATAPERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN AGEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR PERTAINING TO STATUS OF PIECESOF EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES MAY BE DISPLAYED WITH ARLSOLUTION OF AS MUCH AS SIXTEEN LEVELS OF STATUS INFOUR COLORS ON ONE DISPLAY PANEL. THE OTHERD15PLAY PANEL PROVIDES THE CAPAfSILITY TO INDICATE APOINT, DRA4 A LINE OR A BOUNDARYt AND TO BLOCK IN ANAREA UTILIZING A LIGHT MATRIX CONTROLLED ANDPROGRAMMED FROM THE CONTROL CONSOLE. (AUTHOR) (U)
101UNCLASSIFIED iZMmL7
UNCLASSIFIED
AbDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
Av-661 048 15/3 5/9
IOAA STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY AND
ANTHROPOLOGY
A SUMMARY OF THE FINAL REPORT LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES!
THEIR RELATION TO CIVIL DEFENSE, (U)
MAR 67 31P KLONGLANoGERALD •. IBEAL#
GEORGE Me ;BOHLENJUE m. INYEJOHN R.REPT, NO, RURAL SOCIOLOGY-46-S
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF DEFINITIONSAND PERFORMANCES OF CIVIL OEFENSL ROLES OF COUNTY BOARDMEMBERSt MAYORS, AND COUNTY.MUNICIPA6 CIVIL DEFENSE
1.IRECTORS. SEE ALSO AD- 6 61 060.
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *CIVIL DEFENSE
PERSONNEL), (*CIVILIAN PERSONNELo POLITICALSCIENCE), PERFORMANCECHUMAN). DECISION MAKING,
SURVIVALt SHELTERS, bUDGETS, TRAINING (U)
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ARE KEY DECISION.MAKERSIN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS ONThE LOCAL LEVEL* AS LOCAL OFFICIALS ARE GIVEN NEW ITASKS IN -IVIL DEFENSE, THEY UNDERSTAND THEIR ROLES
TO VARYING DEGREES. THE REPORT FOCUSES ON (1)
THE EXTENT TO WHICH LOCAL OFFICIALS UNDERSTAND THEIROWN CIVIL DEFENSE ROLES, (2) THE EXTENT TO 4HICM
TMEY UNDERSTAND THE CIVIL DEFENSE ROLtS OF OTHERLOCAL OFFICIALS, (3) THE LOCAL OFFICIALStEVALUATIONS OF THEIR OWN CIvIL DEFENSE ROLEPERFORMANCESt AND (4) THEIR EVALUATIONS OF THECIVIL DEFENSE ROLE PERFORMANCES OF OTHER LOCALOFFICIALS. FINDINGS ARE STATED* IMPLICATIONSARE DRAON FROM THE FINDINGS FOR CHANGE AGENTS. (J)
102
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLiOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /kMML7
AUm662 603 15/3 5/1SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
COMMAND AND CONTROL IMPLICATIONS or THE CONCEPT OFEMERGENCY OPERATIONS UNDER NUCLEAR ATTACK@ (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: TECHNICAL MEMOo.JUN 67 BOP ABERSMANsALLEN I* iCUSACK,
BRUCE Le |GIBBONSROGER Do IHANEYtTERENCEp. IHODDYsLEE Jo
RLPT. NO. TM-3679
UNCLkSSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, COMMANn +
CONTROL SYSTEMS), NUCLEAR WARFARE, URBAN AREaS,ORGANIZATIONS, CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL9 FALLOUTSHELTERS, MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING, FLOW CHARTING (U)
THt RESULTS OF A STUDY OF THE COMMAND AND CONTROLIMPLICATIONS OF THE OCO CONCEPT OF EMERGENCYOPERATIONS UNDER NUCLEAR ATTACK. THEREPORT DZLINEATES THE APPROACH, AND METHODOLOGY USEDIAND PRESENTS THE RESULTS OF TWO MAJOR EFFORTS. THEFIRST, A STUDY OF THE COMMAND CONTROL AUTHORITIES,RESFONSIBILITIESt FUNCTIONS AND ASSOCIATEDINFORMATION NEEDS; AND THE SECONLs AN ASSESSMENT OFTHE ROLE OF THE EMERGENCY OPERATING CENTERUNDER THIS CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS, (AUTHOR) (U)
103
UNCLASSIFIED lZMfL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Nno /ZMML7
AU.662 781 15/3 5/1
STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
THE COST AND FEASIBILITY OF EMERGENCY COOPERATION
AMONG LOCAL GOVERNMENTSa IU)
OCT 67 93P MOLL,KENDALL IHIRSMBERGIRICHARD
PkOj: SRI-MU-49q9-qlO
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SuPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REPORT ON CIVIL DEFENSEURGANIZATION STUDIES*
DLSCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *MANAGEMENTPLANNING), MANAGEMENT ENGINEERINQS CIVIL DEFENSEPERSONNELS COSTSg FEASIBILITY STUDIEs, uNITEuSTATES GOVERNMENT, CONTROL, POLITICAL SCIENCE (ki)
FROM QUANTITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS OF THE NEED FOREMERGENCY INTERACTIONS AMONG LOCAL GOVERNMENTFUNCTIONS, THE REPORT CONCLUDES THAT AN ESSENTIALLYNEW FORM OF ORGANIZATION MUST BE PLANNED FOREMERGENCY COORDINATION. A NEW ORGANIZATION WILLREQUIRE ABOUT 200 SPECIALLY TRAINED COORDINATORS INSANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA* REALISTICPLANNINGt RECRUITING, TRAINING, AND TESTING ESTIMATES
FOR SUCH A PROGRAM IMPLY A NATIONAL CIVIL DEFENSE I1THE ORDER OF s2 MILLION PER YEAR, ANALYSES oFTHE LEGAL BASIS AND POTENTIAL LOCAL ACCEPTANCE OFCENTRALIZED COORDINATION IN SANTA CLARA COUNTYINDICATE THAT AN EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION WOULD BEFEASIBLE TO ESTABLISH USING CERTAIN PROGRAMGUIDELINES* FIRST, PROGRAM DIRECT COSTS WOULD BEMOST ACCEPTABLE IF SUPPORTED BY THE FEDERALGOVERNMENT. SECONDS THE ORGANIZATION SHOULD BELOCALLY TAILORED TO EXISTING GOVERNMENT STRUCTURESRATHER THAN PATTERNED UNIFOkMLY THROUGHOUT THECOUNTRY. THIRD, THE ORGANIZATION SHOULD BEFLEXIBLE TO PERMIT PRE-EMPTION OF LOCAL AUTHORITY INPROPORTION TO TEE SEVERITY oF THE EMERGENCY,(AUTHOR) (U)
104
UNCLAbSIFIED /ZMML7
1= ~UNCLAsCIfIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO, /ZIML7 2
AU-663 039OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE WASHINGTON D C
CIVIL DEFENSE RESEARCH ANALYSIS. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: RESEARCH REPT.,
NOV 67 I12P DEVANEY#JOHN Fe
REPTO NO* OCO.RR-Ii.REV
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, SCIENTIFICRESEARCH)# ANALYSIS, EFFECTIVENESS, OPERATIONS
RESEARCH, RESEARCH PROGRAM AUMINISTRATION (U)
THC REPORT PRESENTS A METHOD OF ANALYZING TsC CIVIL
DEFENSE RESEARCH PROGRAM TO OBTAIN DATA FOR USE INPREPARING STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEWS, IN PROGRAMMING,
AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. (AUTHOR) (U)
105
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMHL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZMML7
SAD-664 1T0 |5/3 5/4
TECHNICAL OPERATIONS INC ARLINGTON VA WASHINGTON RESEARCHCENTER
SCENARIO-(AME MODEL FOR THE EXERCISE AND EVALUATIONOF NATIONAL LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS* (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,NOV 67 103P MARDICKs*9 Le ;GUTHRIEPo
Go ;HOBSONVo W., JR*IMATHIAS,#JREPTo NO. TOl-TR-67-4CONTRACT: OAHC20-67-C-0160
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DSjt.sRIPTOHS: C.NAT;ONAL DEFENSE9 CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS), (4CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS,MOVELStSIMULATIONS))s GAME THEORY, DECISIONMAKINGo POLITICAL SCIENCE, MILITARY STRATEGY, COLDAAR$ NUCLEAR NARFAREv LEADERSHIP, DETERRENCE,ARMS CONTROL, WARNING SYSTEMS, MANPO*ER,VULNERABILITY (U)IUENTIFIERS: SCENARIOS (U)
THE MODEL WAS DLVELOPCD IN RESPONSE TO AREGUIREMENT ESTABLISHED BY THE OFFICE OF CIVILDEFENSE (OCD), DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY* ITSpURPOSE I5 TO PROVIDE A GAMING ORGANIZATION ANDMETHODOLOGY FOR EXERCISING AND EVALUATING CIVILDEFENSE SYSTEMS WITHIN THE CONTEXT oF REALIST!C ANDCREDIBLE CHANGES IN INTE;NATIONAL TENSIONS AND CRISESBUILDUPS* SINCE THE GAME MODEL IS DESIGNED FORA BROAD SCOPE OF OCD TEST REQUIREMENTS AT THENATIONAL LEVEL# ITS FEATURES BUILT-;N FLEXIBILUTY,THE EMPLOYMENT OF AGGREGATION TECHNIQUES* BROADLYCONTROLLED FREE PLAYI AND RELIANCE ON THE INTUITIVEJUDOMENT OF GAME PARTICIPANTS* (AUTHOR) (U)
lOb
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMpqL7
f1
UNCLASSIFIEO
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /?MML7
AD-664 7S3 S/3 IS/3INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ARLINGTON VA PROGRAMANALYSIS DIV
ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE NEI; ORLEANSMETROPOLITAN AREA. IU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: RESEARCH PAPER&jUL 67 43P FAUCcTT#JACK IKELLEHER.GRACE
js IRLPT9 NO* RP-P-347
TASK: 4131AMONITOR: IDA/HQ 67-6832
UNCLASSIFIEU REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (eCCONOMICS# URBAN AREAS)* (OCavIL
DEFENSE SYSTEMS* LOUISIANA), INDUSTRIES,FEAS!BILITY STUDIES, POPULATIONP FALLOUT SHELTERS$INDU3TRIAL PRODUCTIONt COMMEACE, MONsY8INVENTORY ANALYSISo MOBILIZAT!ON9 MATHEMATICALANALYSIS, CONSUMPTION. LABOR3 TAULES (U)
THE PAPER PRESENTS 1963 INTEPINDUSTRY TRANSACTIONSDAVA ANu COEFFICIENTS FOR THE NEW ORLEANSSTANDARD METRUPOLSTAN STATISTICAL AREA IN TwESAME FORM Ai THE I9S8 NATIONAL INTERINDUSTRY TABLEPREPARED dY THE OFFICE OF BUSINESS ECONOMICqgU*S. DEPARTMENT OF COMmERCE. THE DATA AREPRESEN7ED IN FIVE LARGE (REMOVAbLE) TABLES:INTERINoUSTRY TRANSACTIONS* DIRECTREQUIREMENTS PER DOLLAR OF GROSS OUTPUT,TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (DIRECT AND INDIRECT)PER DOLLAR OF DELIVERY TO FINAL DEMAND,IMPORTS BY PRODUCINQ SECTORS# AND DIRECTIMPORT RE4UIREMENTS PER DOLLAR OF GROSSoUTPUT. THE TEXT OF THE REPORT DESCRIBES THrMATRICES AND GIVES EXAMPLES OF HOW THEY ARE USED.
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS DERIVED FOR WEWORLEANS USING TME NATIONAL AND LOCAL INPUT-OUTPUTDATA IS INCLUDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE VALUE OF AREGIONAL ECONOMICS SURVEY FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CIVILDEFENSE PLANNING* (AUTHORI (U)
107
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMNL7
UNCLASSIFIED
SOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO, /lMML7
AD-66! 383 153 / 111SIMULMATICS CORP CAMBRIDGE MASS
COMMUNITY INTERACTION GAME. tU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT. 19 MAY-27 DEC 67,DEC 67 72P YATEStULES DAVID
CONTRACT: DAHC20-6 7 -C-O1 0 3
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DLSCRIPTOS; (.CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, GAME
THEORY)f (*GROUP DYNAMICS, INTERACTIONS),SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, SIMULATION, BtHAVIORsATTITUDES, DISASTERS. TRAINING, PUBLIC OPINION,DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONS,STRESS(PSYCHOLOGY)s SOCIAL COMMUNICATION (U)
THE REPORT DESCRIBES THE RESULTS OF A STUDY WHICH1S PART OF THE OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSEtS
RESEARCH INTO THE PROCESS OF ADOPTION'DIFFUSION INFUTURE STRATEGY ENVIRONMENTS# THE SIMULMATICSTEAM *AS DIRECTED BY THE STATEMENT OF AORK TO:IDEvELOP A HUMAN SIMULATION EXPERIMENT IN THE FORMOF A GAME TO BE USED AS A DEVICE FOR GAINING NEWINSIGHTS ABOUT HUMAN BEHAVIOR IN CRISIS PERIODS ANDAS A TRAINING AID. THE GAME PROCEDURE hILL ATTEMPTTO FURTHER SYNTHESIZE RESEARCH FINDINGS ABOUT THE
FUNCTION OF COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURE IN IMPLEMENTINGCIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS AND THE LIKELY EFFECTS OFHEIGHTENED INTERNATIONAL CRISIS ON THE EXPECTATIONStATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR OF PEOPLE.' A METHODOLOGYWAS EXPLORED FIR SIMULATING BEHAVIOR WITHIN A
FRAMEWORK DESCRIBING THE FUNCTIONING OF A CnMMUNITYPOAER STRUCTURE. THE TECHNIQUE EMPLOYED WAS THATOF A GAME, *HICH WOULD CAUSE PARTICIPANTS To BEINVOLVED IN INTERACTIONS RESULTING FROM THEIR OWN
ACTIONS AND DECISIONS* PART I OF THIS REPORT ISA DISCUSSION OF THE INITIAL CONCEPTS AND BASES FORTHE GAME. PART 1I AND III DISCUSS THE FIRSTBASIC SIMPLIFICATION AND THE CHANGE OF STRESS OF THEGAME. PART IV IS THE FINAL VERSION OF THE GAME.(AUTHOR) (U)
108
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
SUDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO@ /ZHML7
AO-645 63? 15/3 5/9SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
A MODEL LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE TRAININ. PLAN: ANOR4ANIZATION AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT RESEARCHSTUDY9 JU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: TECHNICAL MEMO.,AUG 67 I7SP BRICTSONqRs C. IBUSTYAsC"
:STREICHtEo Re IREPT. NO. TM-3802
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DLSCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, TRAINING),
CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL, OPERATIONAL READINESS,MANPOWER, MODELS(SIMULATIONS), DISASTERS,
MANAGEMENT PLANNING, NUCLEAR WARFARE, URBAN &REAS,ADVAICED PLANNING, TEACHING METHODS, FLOWCHARTING IU)
UTILILING THE DATA OBTAINED AND FUNCTIONALCATEGORIES DERIVED FROM THE FEDERAL CIVILDEFENSE GUIDE EMERGENCY ACTIONS AND CONTROLAND SUPPORT FUNCTIONS* AN ANALYSIS OF THEEMERGENCY TASKS OF A MODEL LOCAL CIVIL DEFEkSEOPERATION IS PERFORMEDo TRAINING REQUIREMENTSSPECIFIED* PERSONNEL TO BE TRAINED DESIGNATEOD ANDTRAINING METHODS DESCRIBED, THE TRAINING REQUIRED,PERSONNEL DESIGNATED AND TRAINING METHODS SPECIFIEDARE RELATED TO THE OPERATIONAL TASKS IN EACH OF THREETIME PERIODS; NORMAL, INCREASED READINESS ANDACTUAL EMERGENCY* ONE EMERGENCY ACTION CATEGORY -MEDICAL AID -- IS ANALYZED IN DEPTH UTILIZING AMULTI-LAYERED CONCEPT OF FLOW DIAGRAMMING.FINALLY. SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH AREPRESENTED. (AUTHOR) (U)
109
UNCLASSIFIED /ZmiiL?
UNCLASSIFIED
OOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CoNTROL No. /iMML7
AU-668 938 15/3 15/6STANFORo RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
A STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING THEMAGNITUDE AND SCOPE OF NUCLEAR ATTACKS. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,FEB 68 97P RODDENROBERT Me iTHOMPSONP
CHARLES Re IMIERCORT9FREDERIC AsPNOj: SRI-4qg9-646MONITOR: OCD - 16lbA
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *DATAPROCESSING SYSTEMS), (*NUCLEAR OARFARE, *DAMAGEASSESSMENT)o STATISTICAL AINALYSISs NUCLEAREXPLOSION DAMAGE, SURVIVALo POPULATIuN, DECISIONMAKING, APPROXIMATION(MATHEMATICS), REAL TIMr,SAMPLING, FLOW CHARTING, ACCURACY, PATTERN
NECOGNITION, LEAST SWUARES METHOD (U)
THIS RESEARCH DEVELOPS CONCEPTS# FLOW DIAGRAMS, ANDSTATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR AN INFORMATION SYSTEM TOESTIMATE THE MAUNITUDE AND SCOPE OF NUCLEAR ATTACKS.THE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO OPERATE IN THETHANSATTACK AND IMMEDIATE POSTATTACK PERIODS WHENDATA ON THE ATTACK CAN BE EXPECTED TO BE INCOMPLETEAND INACCURATE. THE UNDERLYING PRINCIPLE INESTIMATING ATTACX SIZE IS TMAT OF STATISTICALINFERENCE, fiHICH PERMITS AN ESTIMATE TO BE mADE OFTmE TOTAL ATTACK FROM INFORMATION ON A SAMPLE OF THEATTACK ONLY, HEURISTIC DECIS!ON RULES ARE APPLIEDAS NEEDED TO .'AKE THE SYSTEM OPERABLE, IT ISDEMONSTRATED HOo THE TARGET SYNTHESIS PROCEDURE THUSDEVELOPED MAY BE COUPLED TO A VARIETY OF SURVIVALESTIMATIN4 TECHNIQUES TO YIELD SURVIVAL ESTIMATES.THE RESEARCH ALSO DEVELOPS STATISTICAL METHODOLOGYFOR PROCESSIf4G REPORTS OF NUCLEAR DETONATIOKS.(AUTHOR) (U)
110
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
•j2UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-669 989 15/3 5/1ODEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON D C I
ACTIONS OF THE POPULATION IN A RURAL AREA WHEN THE
CIVIL DEFENSE SIGNALS ARE GIVEN, (U)
MAY 68 laP ISAKOVGe Ps |REPT. NO. TRANS-2600
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: TRANSe OF MONO. DEISTVIYANASELENIYA Po SIGNALAM GRALHDANSKOI OBORONY VSELSKOI MESTNOSTIt MOSCO*, 1967 PI-22.
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, USSR),(*GROUP OYNAMICSs CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS).,POPULATION, RURAL AREAS, WARNING SYSTEMS,INSTRUCTION MtNUALS, TIME, MASKING, AIR, EYE.SHOCK WAVES, REACTlONIPSYCHOLOGY), BIOLOGICALoARFAREs CHEMICAL WARFARE, MEDICAL SUPPLIES,
CsEMICALSs PROTECTIVE COVERINGS, CONTAINERS,NATER SUPPLIES, RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTLMS, FOOD,LVACUATION LU) I
I.ENTIFIERS; TRANSLATIONS 1U)
THE DOCUMENT COVERS INFORMATION CITIZENS SHOULDHAVE IN ORDER To PREPARE FOk DEFENSE AGAINST WEAPONSOF MASS DESTRUCTION, AND TO KNOW WHAT TO DO WHENCIVIL DEFENSE SIGNALS ARE GIVEN AS *ELL AS DURING THEELIMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THE ENEMY ATTACK,(AUTHOR) (U)
FA
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMHL7
UNCLASS!FIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-67U 016 5/11 15/3IO'A STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY AND
ANTHROPOLOGY
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY PO*ER STRUCTURES.A DELINEATION AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PO*ERSTRUCTURES IN FIVE IOWA COMMUNITIES. tU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT~,
AUG 67 3'(6P kOHLENqJUE *M ;BEAL*GEORaEM9 ;KLONGLANiGERALD Ee ;TAITqjOHN L.
RLPTs NO. kURAL SOCIOLOGY-soCONTRACT: UAhCZO-67-C-O1Z3
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: SEE ALSO AD-670 U17.
OLSCRIPTORS: (.SOCIOLOGYt oCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)cLEAULRSHIP, SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY# SOCIOMETRICS,ATTIYUDES, DECISION MAKING,PECREPTION(PSYCHOLOGY), CIVIL DEFENSt PERSONNEL,PO*Evs STATJSTICAL ANALYSIS, IOWA (U)
IUENTIFIERS; *cOAMUNSTY PO*ER STRUCTURES (U)
TOE LOCAL COMMUNITY IS CONCEPTUALIZED AS A SOCIALSYSTEM. ONE OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE SOCIAL SYSTEM
15 SOCIAL PO',, Rs A SOCIAL PcWER MODEL 15 DEFINEDWhICH MAY BE USED BY LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE CHANCEAGENTS FOR ANALYZIN4 SOCIAL POOLR IN TKEIRCOMKUNITIES, THE MAJOR CONCEPTS OF THE SOCIALPO04R MODEL kRZ SOCIAL PO*EH, AUTSORITY, INFLUENCE,POh•E STRUCTURE, AND POWER &CYORS. THE ýOMiuNiTYMEmdERS W*o HAVE SOCIAL PQWFR AND AFFECT THECOMMUNITY DECISION-MAKING PROCESS ARE DESIGNATED ASPU4ER ACTORS. THE INTErRELATIONSH;PS OF THE MAJORCONCEPTS ARE STATED AS 6ENERA.. tYPOTHESLS. 7HESOCIAL POWER MODEL *AS OPERATIONAL1ZED IN FIVE IOWACOMMUNITIES. THE COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS IN EACl.COMMUNITY WERE INTcRYIEWED. THE COMMUNITv ACTORSPERCEIVED THAT SOCTAL POhER FXI.-TED IN THE COMMUNITY.THE COtmU;ITY PJWER A:IORS LXERLISEI SOCIAL PO6ERTO AFFECT THE O±TCOMES OF cuHMUNITY ISSUE AREAS.THEY AERE FOUND TO HAVE SIK!LAR PERSONAL AND SOCIALCHAKACTERISTICS. THE POAER ACTON5 HAD A STRUCTUREIN THEIR :NIE'PLRSONAL RELATIONS* TNE PCWERSTRUCTURES TENDED TO VARY BY ISSUE AREA TO A GREATEREXTENT AS THE SIZE OF THE COMMUNITY INCREASED. INTHE SMA.LLR COMMUNITIEs, THE TOP POWER ACTORS TENDEDTO BE HuLUING POSIT;ONS OF AtITHORITYs vHILE THE TOPPOvER ACTORS IN THE LAR4CR COMMUNITIES TENDED TO NOT
BE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY AT THE PRESENT TIME. (U)
UNCLASSIrIED /ZAML7
UNCLASSIFIED
ODC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-670 017 S/li 15/3IOA STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY ANDANTHROPOLOGY
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY POMER STRUCTURES:A DELINEATION AND COMPARATIVE ANALY5IS OF POWERSTRUCTURES IN FIVE IOWA COMMUNITIES, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT,,AUG 67 68P BOMLENJGE M, IBEALGEORGE
Me ;KLONGLANiGERALD E, |TAITvJOMN Le 1RLPTo NO. RURAL SOCIOLOGY-5Sos
CONTRACT: OAHCZO-67-C-0123
MONITOR: OCD qb|'$ E
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: SEE ALSO AO0670 016.
DLSCRIPTORS: (*SUCIOLOGY, *CIVIL DEFENSE SYS7EMS)oLEADERSHIP, SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIOMETRICS,ATTITUDES, DECISION MAKING,
PERCEPTIONCPSYCHOLOGY), CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL.POWER9 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, IOWA (U)
ILENTIFIERS: *COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURES (U)
THE lOCAL COMMUNITY IS CONCEPTUALIZED AS A SOCIALSYSTEM, ONE OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE SOCIAL SYSTEM1S SOCIAL PQ*ER, A SOCIAL POWER MODEL IS DEFINED
MWICH MAY eE USED BY LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE CHANGE
AGENTS FOR ANALYZING SOCIAL POWER IN THEIR-4 COMMUNITIES, THE MAJOR CONCEPTS OF THE SOCIAL
POQER MODLL ARE SOCIAL PO*ER, AUTHORITY, INFLUENCEsPOWER STRUCTURE, AND POWER ACTORS. THE COMMUNITY
MEMaERS WHO HAVE SOCIAL POWER AND AFFECT THECOMmUNITY DECISION-MAKING PROCESS ARE DESIGNATED ASPoOER ACTORS. THE INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF THE MAJORCoNCEPTS ARE STATED AS GENERAL hYPOTHESES. THESSOCIAL POWER MODEL WAS OPERATIONALIZED IN FIVE IOWA
COMMUNITIES. THE COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS IN EACHCOMhUNITY WERE INTERVIEWED, THE COMMUNITY ACTORS4 PLRCEIVED THAT SOCIAL POWER ExISTED IN THE COMMUNITY.THE CCMMUNITY POWER ACTORS EXERCISED SOCIAL POWERTO AFFECT THE OUTCOMES OF COMMUNITY ISSVE APEASOTHEY WERE FOUND TO HAVE SIMILAR PERSONAL AND SOCIALCHARACTERISTICS, THE POWER ACTORS HAD A STRUCTUREIN THEIR INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS. THE POWERSTRUiTURES TENDED TO VARY BY ISSUE AREA TO A GRLATEREXTENT AS THE SIZE OF THE COMMUNITY INCREASED. INtiE SMALLER COMM!;NITIES, THE TOP POWER ACTORS TENDED
TO oE HOLDING POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY, WHILE THE TOP
Po0ER ACTORS IN TKE LAR6ER COmMUNITIES TENDED TO NOToU)
113UNC41 AsSIFIED /ZE4ML7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /ZMML7
AU-67U 986 15/3 liMICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSINU DEPT OFCOMMUNICATION
A PILOT STUDY OF yOUNG AMLRICANS# BELIEFS ANDKNO,VLEDGE ABOUT CIVIL DLFENSE* (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: PRtLIMINARY REPT, NO, It
MAR 6b 39P (aREENBERIoBRADLEY S,DOMINICKJOSEPH Re ;RAZINSKYsEDWARD I
CONTRACT: OAHC20-67-C-0119MONITOR: OCD '9831-C
U1NCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *PUBLIC-PINION)o ATTITUOEbs ADOLESCENTS, STUDENTS#SOCIAL COMMUNICATION# FALLUUT SHELTERS (U)
THE 5TUgy SOUGHT ANSWERS TO T*O QUESTIONS:(1) *HAT IS THE DIFFERE1NCE bETWLEN TWO GROUJPSOF TEE1NAGERS IN TERMS OF CD INFORMATION ANDATTITUDES, amERE ONE GROU? HAS dEEN EXPOSED TO ANINTENSIVE IN-SCHOOL CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM$ AND(2) WHAT DIFFERENCES IN INFuRMATION ANDATTITUDES EXIST BETWEEN YOUNGER AND OLDCR TEENAGERS(Iý VS. 17-YEAR-OLDS). THE PRINCIPAL POSITYJEEFFECTS OF THE SCHOOL CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM WERE INTERMS OF INFORMATIONAL AND COMMUNICATION BEHAVIORS$
THE YOUNG PEOPLE WERE BETTEN INFORMED, USED MOREAND DIFFERENT SOURCES OF INFORMATION, TALKED MOREABOUT CU AND SHELTERS, AMON6 OTHER bEHAVIORS. TOTHE EXTENT THAT AGE MAKES A DIFFERENCE, IT APPEARS ToMANIFEST ITSELF IN SOMEWHAT LESS FAVORAdLE cD
ATTITUDES. THE YOUNGSTERS WHO HAD BEEN EXPOSED TOA SYSTEMATIC PRO5RAM OF INFORMATION THOUGHT MOREFAVORABLY ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE ALONG SEVERALDIENSIONS, THEY RATED CIVIL DEFENSE AS WISER,MORE IMPORTANT, MORL INTERESTING, BOLDER, SAFER, ANDMORE EXPENSIVE, THAN DID THE OTHER TEENAGERS.THEIR JUD4MENTS WERE MORE INTENSE* NONE OF THESEJUdgMENTS hERE NEGATIVE ONES. IT WAS THAT THEGHOUP WITH tr-ORE INFORMATION WAS RELATIVELY P.OREFAVORABLE IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF CD AS A TOPIC.
(AUTHOR) (U)
114
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML?
UNCLASSIFIEU
aDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CuNTROL NO. /ZMML7
AU-681 273 IS/3 12/2RESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND
ECONOMICS DIV A
CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATING SYSTEM SYNTHESIS:COUNTERMEASURES MODELs (U)
DESCRIFTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT,s
OCT 68 69P HENDRYROBERT N,REPTo NO. RTI-R-OU-371-1
UNCL.ASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (eCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, SYSTEM%LN%,INEERING,. MATHEMATICAL MODELS,COUNTERMEASURES, MISSION PROFILESt FLOO CHARTING,MANAGEMENT PLANNING, MANAGEMLNT CONTROL SYSTFMS,COSTS (U)
SYNTHESIS OF A COMPATIBLE LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEM INVOLVES A DEFINITION OF THE MISSIONS9OPEKATIONS, COMPONENTS, ORGANIZATION, PERFORMANCECHARACTERISTICSo AND BENEFITS (OUTPUTS) TO ANAPPROPRIATE LEVEL OF DETAIL. THE SYNTHESIZEnSTRUCTURE IS DESIGNED TO SOLVE IN A DYNAMIC WAY ANALLOCATION PROBLEM INVOLVING RESOURCE CONSUMPTION ANDDEPLOYMENT STRATEGIES. THE BASIC COUNTERMEASORESMODEL CONCEPT IS DESCRIBED SHOWING ITS RELATIONSHIP
TO TmE TARGET'S UNIT AREAS AND THE PROBLEM-SOLVINGDEMANDS OCCURRING WITHIN THEM. MEASURES OFCOUNTERMEASURE BENEFITS ARE INDICATED AS OUTPUTS FROMTHE MODEL. BENEFITS ARE VIEwED AS TmE GAINMEASURED BY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RESOURCE LOSSESRESULTING FROM COmPETING COUNTERMEASURES* SYSTEMOPERATING CYCLES, INFORMATION FLO*e AND THE CENERALCOUNTERMEASURE MODEL ANALYTICAL PROCESS ARE DESCRISEDBRIEFLY TO CLARIFY THIS APPkOACH TO SYSTEMEVALUATION, LOCAL AND NATIONAL MODELINTERRELATIONSHIPS ARE IDENTIFIED IN ORDER TO INSURECOMPATIBILITY WITH NATIONAL MODEL DEVELOPMENTSTUDIES, (AUTHOR) (U)
115
UNCLASSIFIED /ML
T°1U(NCLASSIFIED
UDC REpORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7
AD-684 936 15/3 6/8
STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLU PARK CALIF
NLA RATION• CONCEFTS# (U)
O.SCRIPTIvE N|OTE: FINAL REPT. 15 MAR 68-1 FEd 699FEB 69 36P TATEJ, NORMAN , JRo:
MATHEWSRICHARD D# ;STONEHLRBERT ICUNTRACT: UAHC20-67-C-Ol36PROJ: SRI-6300-aiO
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DLSCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, OFOOD),COSTS9 PROTEINS, AMINO ACIDS. VITAMINS,STORAGE9 ACCEPTABILITY (U)
IDENTIFIERS: oRATIUNS (UI
A RATION FOR USE IN THE OFFICE OF CIV'LDEFENSE RATION PROGRAM hAS DEVELOPED. THEp(OLUCT WAS FORMULATED FROM *HOLE 4mEAT FLOUR.CAS4INs BAKING PO*DER, SODIUM CHLORIDE, SUCROSEs FAT,YLASTs OATER, AND SMALL AMOUNTS OF OTHER INGREDIENTS,A DAILY PORTION CONTAINED 9U0 CALORIES AND 18aSSPROTEIN, AND MET ALL THE REWUIREMEtqTS FOR TmEESSENTIAL AMINO ACIDS, THE COST OF THE PRODUCT nASESTIMATED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 11 CENTS PER mAN-OAY#PRELIMINARY RAT NUTRITION STUDIES 6LRECONuUCTED* (U)
116
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CUNTROL NO. /ZIML7
AD-685 881 5/11 i5/3 5/1HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN VA
INDICArORS OF SOCIAL VUL.NERABILITY: SOCIALINDICATORS IN CIVIL DEFENSE PLANNINQ AND
EVALUATION. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,AUG 68 3214P VERTERMARK9S, D, 9 JRI
GRELRSCOTT IKORNHAUSEP,*ILLIAM ISWEENJOYCE IwiNCHRoBLRT I
REPT. NO. HSR-RR-68/IZ-BECONTRACT: 0AHC20-67-C'0136
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; (OCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSt MANAGEMENTPLANNING), ($MANAGEMENT PLANNING, SOCIOMETRICS),SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VULNERABILITY, ATTITUDES,GROUP DYNAMICSo ORGANIZATIONS, LAW, POPULATION,MANAGEMENT PLANNING, CHILORE1I, NUCLEAR WARFARE (U)
IUENTIFIERS; POST ATTACK PLANNING, CIVILDISOBEDIENCE, SOCIAL EFFECTS INDICATORS (U)
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT IS TO PROPOSE ANDOUTLINE SOME NEN ANALYTiC TOOLS FOR APPLYING SOCIALINFORMATION TO SYSTEMS PLANNING AND SYSTEMSEVALUATION IN CIVIL DEFENSE. AS ONE OF A SERIES OFRELATED REPORTS ON THE SOCIAL DIMENSIONS OF CIVILDEFENSE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, THIS REPORT BUILDS ON MOREGENERAL WORK WHICH HAS BEEN REPORTEd AT EARLIERTIMES* (AUTHOR) (U)
117
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO& /LMML 7
AU-686 303 15/3 5/10 5/11MICHIGAN $TATE UNIV EAST LANSING DEPT OF
COMMUNICATION
CORRELATES OF YOUNG AMERICANS* BELIEFS AND
KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE, (U)
OCT 68 SIP GREENBER6,6RADLEY S, :
DOMINICKoJOSEPH Re IREpTs NO* 29 BG-5CONTRACT: DAHC20m67-C-OII9
URCLASSIFIED NEPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: SEE ALSO AD-670 986,
DESCRIPTORS; (eCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *PUBLICOPINION), ATTITUDES, ADO6ESCLNTS, STUDENTS,
SOCIAL COMMUNICATION, FALLOUT SHELTERS, cOSTS,
DECISION MAKING, MOTIVATION, QUESTIONNAIRES (U)
THIS STUDY EXAMINED CERTAIN COMMUNICATION BEHAVIORS
AND ATTITUDINAL BEHAVIORS OF TEEN-A4ERS AND THEII
CONCEPTIONS OF CIVIL DEFENSE AND FALLOUT SHELTnRS,
THREE ASPECTS OF COMMUNICATION ACTIVITY WERE
EXAMINEo--NUMBER OF SOURCES FOR CIVIL DEFENSEINFORMATION, COMMUNICATED INTEREST IN CIVIL DEFENSE
AND KNO.JLEDGE ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE* TWO OF THE
ABOVE BLHAVIORSo.uSING MANY SOURCES OF CDINFORMATION AND MUCH COMMUNICATED INTEREST ZN CO--WERE HIGHLY INTERCORRELATEDo BOTH AERE ALSO
ASSOCIATED AITH MORE MASS MEDIA USE, FREQUENT FAMILY
INTERACTION, AND MORE SCHOOL CD ACTIVITIES, THEYWERE ALSO ASSOCIATED WITH POSITIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDCCU, KNO*LEDGE ABOUT CD COULD NOT BE WELL
EXPLAINED BY THE VARIABLES IN THE PRESENT STUDY.
WITH REGAHD TO THE TEEN-AGERS1 ATTITUDES TOwARDCIVIL DEFENSE AND FALLOUT SHELTERS, THE ThO CRITICAL
ATTITUDINAL AREAS WERE THE INDIVIDUALIS GENERALEVALUATION OF SHELTERS AND THE ATTITUDES HE PERCEIVED
HIS PARENTS TO HAVE* EACH OF THREE SPECIFIC
ASPECTS OF SHELTER ATTITUDEs--PROTECTIONo CONDITIONS
INSIDE, AND COSTS--*AS STRONGLY INTER-RELATED ,itHBOTH THE TEEN-AGERIS OWN EVALUATION AND HIS
pERCEPTION OF HIS PARENT'S ATTITUDES. (AUTHOR) (U)
118
UNCLASSIFIEU /ZmpL?
UNCLASSIFIED
UOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-687 296 15/J S/l1
PITTSBURGH UNIV PA UEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
AMERICANS' PERCEPTIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL AND UCIVIL DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTS: !968* (UI
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: SUMMARY REPTe.SEP 68 SUP MASTROBERT He ILAULICHT9
jEROME lKNESTRICKoROY :VIETTAALER*ERICH IGLUCKMANtdARBARA
CONTRACT: DAHCZO-67-C'OlZ,2 NSF-41 1 3 09
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REPORT ON AMERICANS1 VIE.vS AdOUT
CIVIL DEFENSE ISSUES*
DESCRIPTORS; (oCIVIL DErENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLICOPINION), ATTITUDES@ PATTERN RECOGNITION, THREAT
EVALUATION, COMMUNISM9 WARVARE, UUIDED MISSILES9
JISARMAMENT, PROBLEM SOLV14G. PREDICTIONS,BUOGETS, EFFECTIVENESS, REVIEWS (U)
IDENTIFIERS; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IU)
THE REPORT EXAMINES ORIENTATIONS OF THE AMERICANPUB6IC ON ISSUES dELEVANT TO THE INTERNATIONAL AND
CIVIL DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTS IN THE SUMMER OF 19689THE DATA *ERE OBTAINED FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY OF
APPROXIMATELY 1SO0 RESPONDENTSo WHERE POSSIaLEIFINOINGS FROM PAST SIMILAR SURVEYS *ERE COMpARED WITH
THE 1968 DATA. (AUTHOR) (U)
t •119
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMmL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZMML7
AD-687 297 15/3PITTSBURGH UNIV PA UEPT OF SOCIULOGY
CITIES AND CIVIL DEFENSE: AN ECULOGICAL APPROACH TOTHE ANALYSIS OF CIVIL DEFENSE DATA, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: SUMMARY REPTo,SEP 68 69P MYERSHOhARD Po I
CUNTRACT: OAHC20-67-C-0o22
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REPORT ON AMERICANS, VIE.,S ABOUTCIVIL DEFENSE ISSUES-
DLSCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, OPUBLICOPINION), STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, URBAN AREAS,FALLuUT SHELTERS, SURVIVAL,REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY), ECULOGY, A;TITUOES,POPULATION (U)
IN A STUDY IN WHICH ECOLOICAL AND CIVIL DEFENSEVARIABLES ARE CROSS-TABULATjD, IT IS FOUND THATPOPULATIONS OF CITIES THAT ARE RELATIVELY UNSTABLE,MOBILE, AND IMMATURE ARE LIKELY TO DISPLAY APOTENTIAL FOR CIVIL DEFENSE ACTIONo FAVORABLEEVALUATION OF FALLOUT SHELTERS IN PARTICULAR ANDCIVIL DEFENSE IN 6ENERAL, PERCEPTION OF LOCAL DANGERAND CHANCES OF SURVIVAL, ANO A MARKED LEANING TOWARDCIvIL DEFENSE WHEN RELATED ISSUES IN THE BROADERCGouTEXT OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ARECONSIDERED, (AUTHUR) (U)
120
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No. /lMML7
Aw-687 361 15/3 5/11
PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
CIVIL DEFENSE FAVORABILITY: A CRITICALANALYSIS, (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: SUMMARY REPT.,
JUL 68 146P MYERS*HOWARD P. ICONTRACT: DAmCzO-67-C"ClZI2 NSF-6113O9
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS# *PUBLICOPINION), STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, PROTECTION,14UCLEAR EXPLOSIONS, FALLOUT SHELTERS, SOCIOLOGY*ATTITUDES (Ul
BY LOCATING PEOPLE IN TERMS OF A DISTINCTIONBETWEEN CIVIL DEFENSE FAVORABILITY AS A SOC!ALPRESCRIPTION AND CIVIL DEFENSE FAVORABILITY AS ASOCIAL ISSUE, IT WAS POSSIBLE TO SPECIFY TENDENCIESIN TERMS OF THE VARIABLES THAT WERE THE FOCI OF THISANALYSIS- HIGHLY INFORMED PEOPLE WHO DISAGREEDTHAT THE POOERS OF THE FEDERAL iOVERNMENT AREEACESSIVE SHOWED TENDENCIES TO OBSERVE SOCIALPRESCRIPTIONS (TOOK PROTECTIVE STEPS IN THE CASE OFNUCLEAR ATTACK) AND TO SUPPORT SOCIAL ISSUES(FAVORED THE BUILDING OF FALLOUT SHELTERS).LOW6Y INFORMED PEOPLE AHO AGREED THAT THE POWERSARE EXCESSIVE 31OWED JUST THE OPPOSITE TENDENCIES.PEOPLE WHO WERE HIGHLY INFORMED BUT WHO AGREED ANDPEOPLE OHO WERE LOWLY INFORMED dUT WHO DISAGREEDSHOWED mIAED TENDENCIES. FOR THE LATTER, SUPPORTFOR SHELTER BUILDING WAS LARGELY A CONVENTIONALIZEDRESPONSE- FOR THE FORMER, OPPOSITION WAS NOT AREFLECTION OF DEFIANCE TOhARDS A PARTICULAR SOCIALINSrITUTIONe IT WAS THE ARTICULATION OF A POSITIONIN *HICH A CERTAIN CONTROVERSY WAS pERCEIVEor(AUTHOR) (U)
121
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMmL?
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /LMML7
A0-689 462 15/3SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
INTRA EOC SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, (U)
DOSCRIPTIVE NOTE: TECHNICAL MEMO.,MAY 69 7UP 6AYDOSHENRY Fe :
RLPT@ NO* SDC-TM-L-4202/OOI/oO
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: PREPARED IN COOPERATION AITH
5TANFORD RLSEARCH INST., MENLO PARK, CALIF.
DLSCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, OPERATIONALREADINESS), ANALYSIS, MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING,
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (U)IDENTIFIERS: OEMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTERS (U)
THE SIGNIFICANT FACTORS INVOLVEU IN EXPEDITING THEFLOn OF INFORMATION THROUGH A CIVIL DEFENSEEMENGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER. ANO THEIRIMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS AND RESOLUTION OF PROBLEMAREAS ARE PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED. (AUTHOR) (U)
122
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML?
- . -- ,--j -
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CoNTROL NOo /ZMML7
AU-691 13q 15/3 IS/6
STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
EVALUATION OF CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONAL:ONCEPTs, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,NOV 68 SIP LAURINORICHARD |KAMRADTC,
ALEXANDER I
CONTRACT: DAHC20-67-COII6
PROJ: SRI-MU-62SO-U20
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
OLSCRIPTORS: (oNuCLEAR AARFARE$ CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS), (oCIVIL DEFENSK SYSTEMS,OcOUNTERMEASURES), DAMAGE ASSESSMENT@ NUCLEAREXPLOSION DAMAGE, FIRES, EXPLOSION EFFECTS,VULNERABILITY, RADIATION HAZARDS, NUCLEAR WARFARECASUALTIES# FALLOUT SHELTERS, AIRBRST, SURFACEBURST, RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT, DOSE RATE, STATISTICALUATA, CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL (U)
IDENTIFIERS: BOS(BASIC OPERATING SITUATIONS),BASIC OPERATING SITUATIONS (U)
THE CONCEPTS OF CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONAL PLANNINGFOR THE TRANSATTACK PERIOD ON THE BASIS OF EXPECTEDOPERATIONAL SITUATIONS OR CONTINGENCIES ARE REVIEWED.
NINE SITUATIONS BASED ON COMBINATIONS OF SELECTEDLEVELS OF FALLOUT INTENSITIES AND WEAPON-CAuSED FIRESARE CONSIDERED, INCLUDING ONE SITUATION INVOLVING NOWEAPONS EFFECTS. THE REQUIRED EMERGENCY OPERATIONSATTENDANT TO EACH SITUATION ARE IDENTIFIED* THEGEOGRAPHICAL AREA FOR WHICH OPERATIONAL CONTINGENCYPLANS WOULD BE UEVELOPED WOULD BE SUCH THAT THEOPERATIONAL SITUATION %OULD BE THE SAME THROUGHOUTTHE AREA. ACCORDINGLY, STATISTICAL MEASURES WEREDEVELOPED AS THE BASIS FOR SELECTION OF THE UNITAREAS WHICH SHOa THE FALLOUT INTENSITY GRADIENTS AS AFUNCTION OF A RANGE OF WEAPON YIELDS ANQ PROBABLEWINO CONDITIONS. EXPECTED THERMAL IGNITION RANGES,AND OVERPRESSURE SCALING FUNCTIONS. (AUTHOR) (U)
123
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMIL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL No* /ZtML7
AJ-692 876 5/3 IS/3INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ARLINGTON VA PRORAMANALYSIS DIV
ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE UNITEU STATES USING THECOuivTY AS A FUNCTIONAL BASE. (I)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: RESEARCH PAPER,APR 69 168P SACHStABNER ;TIMMERMANSt
JUDITH A.RLPT. NO. RP-P-SlICONTRACT: OCD-PS-66-113MUNIToR; IDA/HQ 69"-OI$5
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS. RECOVERY),(*ECONOMICS, OUNITED STATES), MOdILIZATION,PASSIVE UEFENSE, TABLES, ANALYSIS, POPULATIOtrtINDUSTRIES, COMMERCE, AGRICUI-TURL, MINERALS$MONEY* CARGO. DAMS, IRON INDUSTRY, STEELINUUSTRY, PETROLEUM INDUSTRY, ELECTRIC POWERPRODUCTION (U)
IDENTIFIERS; *ECONOMIC GLOGRAPHY, *REGIONALPLANNING, ZIP MARKETING AREAS, RLSOURCES,NATURAL GAS, LIVESTOCK (U)
THE PAPER PRESENTS POPULATION AND OTHER SELECTEDRESOURCE DATA USING THE COUNTY AS THE BASICGEOGRAPHIC UNIT. THL ECONOMIC MEASURES WERE CHOSENWITH CIVIL DEFENSE PLANNING IN MIND, TMHEY I;ICLUDE*AMONG OTHERS# VALUE ADDED BY MANUFACTURE, NuMBEROF MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS, IRON AND STEELMILLS, PETROLEUM REFINERIES. ELECTRIC QENERATIN4STATIONS, EMPLOYMENT$ RETAIL TRADE SALES, FoOD SALE5 ,*HOLESALE TRADE SALES, AGRICULTURAL ACREAGE. VALUE OFCROPS AND LIVESTOCK SOLDO AND VALUE OF MINERALSHIPMENTS. THESE oATA, ARRAYED 0Y COUNTY, ARECOMPARED TO POULATION BASES CONSISTING OF THECOUNTIES CONTAINING THE FIRST 20 TO 60 PERCENT OF THETOTAL US POPULATION* THE COUNTIES INCLUDED INTHESE POPULATION PERCENTAGES ARE DESIGNATED ANDANALYZED AS 'CORE' COUNTIES AND THE COUNTIESCONTIGUOUS TO THEM ARE ALSO SEPARATED OUT FORINVESTIGATION. THIS 'CORES AND 'CONTIGUOUS' COUNTYARRANGEMENT LED TO A STRUCTuRING OF ECONOMIC REGIONSAS A PROPER FRAME FOR CIVIL DEFENSE RECOVERYOPERATIONS. 'ZIP MARKETING AREAS' AERE FOUNDTO dE THE MOST USEFUL DESIGN FOR ECONOMIC REGIONS.(AUTHOR) (U)
124
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7A
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPOkT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CuNTROL NO* /ZMIL7
AD-695 641 S/3 IS/3STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OFCOUNTERMEASURES TO POSSIBLE POSTATTACK FISCALPROdLEMSq (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPTtAPR 69 qdP DRESCHFRANCIS Ag
CONTRACT: DAHC2O-T7-C¢OO&6PROJ: SRI-625U-4O~q OCD-353E
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DLSCRIPTOHS; ('CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ECUNOMICS),(•NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAiEs COUNTERMEASURES).MATHEMATICAL MODELS, MONEY, CONTROLt PRODUCTION,
LABOR, MANAGEMENT PLANNING, CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS (U)
IN THE COURSE OF RESEARCH ON TOTAL VULNERABILITY, AQUANTITATIVE MODEL HAS BEEN DEVELOPED FOR USE IN
DESCRIBIN•v FINANCIAL AND OTHER INSTITUTION'AL SYSTEM$RELATED TO THE ECONOMY AS A WHOLE* THE REPORTDISCUSSES SELECTED APPLICATIONS OF THE PROTOTYPEMODEL To POSTA T TACK PLANNLNG AND CONSIDERS THEFEAbIBILITY OF EXTENDING IT TO FACILITATE ITS USE FORSUCm APPLICATIONSe (AUTHOR) (U)
125
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMNL7
UNCLASSIFIED
VDC REPORT dIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMIL7
AU-696 135 15/3UNS RESEARCH CO BURLINGAME CALIF
CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS, IU)
MAY 69 i1UP MILLERCARL Fe I
REPT@ NO. URS-757-1CONTRACT: OAHC20-69-Cin012PNOJ: OCU-3119A
UNCLASS!FIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, *MANAGEMENT
PLANNING), (*NUCLEAR WARFARE, PASSIVL DEFENSE),NUCLLAR EXPLOSIONS, SYSTEMS LNGINEERING, HAZARDS,
SHELTERS, RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT, DAMAGE AssESSMENT,
SURVIVAL, RADIATION EFFECTS, MORTALITY RATES.
CASUALTIES, DEBRIS, FIRES, BLAST, VEHICLES (U)IDENTIFIERS: *OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS (U)
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG NUCLEAR WEAPONS EFFECTS AND
CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONAL SYSTEM VARIABLES ARESUMMARIZED AND USED AS A BASIS FOR PERIVING CIVIL
DEFENSE OPEkATIONAL CONCEPTS, CI.ASSIFICATION OFHAZARD CONDITIONS* AND SYSTEMS OF STANDARD oPERATIONROUTINES, CENTERED UN PROTECTIVE SHELTER AND ONOPERATIONS FROM THE SHELTER. NINE GENERAL CLASSES OF
BASIC HAZARD CONDITIONS (BHC) FOR 911IC1 DIFFERENTOPTIONS OF STANDARD OPERATING ROUTINES (SOR'S)
WOULD BE NEQU!RED ARE SUGGESTED. THE NINE CLASSES
AKE COM61NATIONS OF THREE POSSIBLE LEVELS OF FALLOUTHAZARDS AND THREE POSSIBLE LEVELS OF PHYSICAL DAMAGE
FOR AN AREA, (AUTHOR) (U)
126
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
U1NCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. IZMML7
AD-697 180 [5/3 14/1WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP WALTHAM MASS ADVANCED STUDIESGROUP
COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEASUREMENT OF CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS*
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPTtOCT 6? 89P SINGERARNOLO ;RICHARDSONoRo
p. ;REPTs NO. W-4291C4NTRACT! DAHC2O"68'C-0 16 2
PROJ: OC-411iSC
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SDESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSe COST
EFFECTIVENESS). SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS, DECISION MAKING, MISSION PROFILES (U)
THE PROBLEM OF 'MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE
TOTAL CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEM IS AUDRESSED IN THE STUDY,WITH THE EMPHASIS AND PRIMAkY CONCERN BEING THE
DEVELOPMENT AND METHODS OF APPLICATION OF CRITERIAMEASURES FOR SYSTEM EVALUATION. THE REPORTPRESENTS AND DISCUSSES CRITERIA THAT SHOULD BE USEDIN ESTABLISHING EVALUATION MEASURES| PROBLEMS THATAHE ENCOUNTERED WHEN MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE AND
EFFECTIVENESS ARE USED FOH SYSTEM AND SUBSYSTEMEVALUATIONS, AND METHODS OF DEALING hITH THFSEPROdLEMS; AND SOME MEASURES OF COST, PERFORMANCE, ANDEFFECTIVENESS RELEVANT TO CD SYSTEMS EVALUATION.
(AUTHOR) (U)
II7
127
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMMLI
UN CLAS! IF IED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CGNTROL No. /ZiML7
AD-704 366 1b/3 5/1RLSLARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C OPERATIONS RESEARCH ANDECONOMICS DIV
DEFINITION OF LOCAL OPERATING AREAS, (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,MAN 7U 87P TRUSTMANS. I
RLpT. NO. RTI-OU-427-2CONTRACT: 0AMC20°69.C-0107PROJ: OC"O-3 168
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, OMANAGEMENTPLANNING). TMREAT EVALUATION, URBAN AREAS, RURALAREAS, DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS, POPULATION,VULNERABILITY, STANDARDS, PERSONNEL fU)
THE OBJECTIVES OF THIS INVESTIGATION WERETHREEFOLD; THE INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS orPATTERNS OF GEOGRAPHICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF LOCALITIESIN TERMS OF THEIR USABILITY AND DESIRABILITY FOR THEPURPOSES OF EVALUATING LOCAL TOTAL CIVIL DEFENSEStSTEmS; THE DETERMINATION oF DATA TO BE COLLECTED TODLSCRIBE EACH OF THE GEOGRAPNICAL SUBDIVISIONS INTERMS SUITABLE FOR THE EVALUATION OF LOCAL CIVILDEFENSE SYSTEMS; AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCEDURES ToESTIMATE THE VULNERABILITY uF THE PEOPLE,INSTITUTIONS AND RESOURCES Or THE GEOGRAPHICSUBUIVISIONS. (AUTHOR)
(U)
128
UNCL4SSIFIED /ZMML7
r!UNCLA5SIF|E0
•DC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-7US 50U 15/3 5/1OLFENSE DOCUMENTATION CENTER ALEXANDRIA VA
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT
PLAUNINo VOLUMIE Is EU
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUG 60.OCT 69omAY 7U 157P
REPT@ NOo ODC-TAS-70"45-l
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: SEE ALSO VOLUME 2, AD-863 qooe
DESCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS,6IBLIOGRAPHIES)o (*MANAGEMENT PLANNING1 C!VIL
OEFENSE SYSTEMS)o MANAGEMENT PLANNING3 ATTITUDES,PUBLIC OPINION, MANPOWER, ECONOMICS, TRAINING, IRADIOACTIVE FALLOUT, SHELTERS, CIVIL DEFENSEPERSONNEL (U)
THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY 15 VOLUM.E I OF A TWO.VOLUME
SET OF REFERENCES ON CIVIL OEFENSE SYbTEMS:SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING.
DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS VOLUME PERTAIN yO
MANAGEMENT TRAINING, PUdLIC OPINION, SOCIAL IMPACTo
AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS, COMPUTER-GENERATEDINDLXES OF CORPORATE AUTHOR.MONITORING
AGENCYt SUBJCTo AND CONTRACT ARE PROVIDED, (U)
129
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMmL7
U NCLASS I F IED
DOC REPORT SIBL;UGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Nn. /LMML7 .1
AU-71U 302 15/6 5/11PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
THE PERCEPTION OF LOCAL SURViVAL CHANCES: ANEAP6ORATORY EXPLANATIONs (U)
MAR 70 SOP MASTROBERT HeCUNTRACT: UAMC2O-67-C-01229 NSF-(ll3u9
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLLMENTARY NOTE: REPORTS ON AMERICANS' VIEWS ABOUTCIVIL DEFENSE ISSUES*
DLSCRIPTOHS: (eNUCLEAR WARFARE, SURVIVAL),
(eATTITUUES, 'NUCLEAR WARFARE), CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS, DISARMAMENT, SHELTERS, WUESTIONNAIRrS (Uj
THE REPORT EXAMINES THE IMPACT OF A COMBINATION OFATTITUDES, BEHAVIORSt AND SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS ONPLOPLE'- PERCEPTIUNb OF HOW MANY PEOPLL IN THEIRLOCALITY 4OULO SURVIVE A NUCLEAN AAR$ ATTITUDESABOUT CIVIL DEFeNSE ISSUES AND THE INTERNATIONALCONTEXT WERE FOUND TO BE THE BEST PREPICTORS OF THEESTIMATES OF SURVIVAL. lAUTmOR) (U)
?I
1u30
UNCLASS;FIED /ZMmL7
UNCLASSIFIED
UOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZMML7
AV.711 056 15/3 5/11STANFORD RESCARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
FAMILY FINANCE AS A CONSTRAINT ON CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS* (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,APR 70 63P DRESCHIFRANCIS he I
CONTRACT: DAHC20-69-C-0295"•o•: SRI-MU-8OZO, OCD-4153A
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ECONOMICS),EMPLOYMENT, WAGES, TRANSPORTATION, RECORDS,COMMUNICATION SYSTEM5, SURVIVAL (U)
jOENTIFIERS: *BANKING SERVICES (U)
THE ORJECTIVES OF THE STUDy WERE TO IDENTIFYPOSSiBLE CONSTRAINTS ON CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS THATMIGHT ARISE BECAUSE OF FINANCIAL CONCERNS OrINDIVIDUAL HOUSEHOLDERS AND TO ASSESS CONCEIVABLECOUNTERMEASURES TO THE CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIEDo THEHOJSEHOLDER FINANC|iL CONCEioNS OF RELEVANCE WEREFOUND To bE THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUITY OFEMPLOYMENT AND *AGES9 ADEQUATE TRANSPORTATION FORCOMMUTING AND SHOPPING, ADE.UATE BANKIN4 ANO CHECKCLEARING SERVICES, AVAILABILITY OF CREDIT, ANDSURVIVAL OF FINANCIAL RECORDSo THE CIVIL DEFENSE
SYSTEMS CONCEIVABLY AFFECTED BY HOUSEHOLDER FINANCIALCONCERNS tsERE EVACUATION AND qEi.OCATION, EMERGENCY
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION, BANKING SERVICES, PROTECTION OFFINANCIAL RECORDSo COMMUNICATIONS, AND POLICIES ANDCONTROLS FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. lAUTHOR) (U)
131
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMmL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DoC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZMML 7
AD-711 118 15/3 b/il
PITTSBUPGm UNIV PA DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY
THE PUBLIC1S PERCEPTION OF LOCAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE
EFFORTS AND FACILITIES# IU)
MAR 70 dilP COHENPEARL Bd I
CONTRACT: DAHC2O-67-CO0122PROJ; OCo-4B12B
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMEN(ARY NOTE: ONE IN A SERIES OF REPORTS ON
AMERICANtS VIEWS ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE ISSUES*
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSe *PUBLIC
OPIvION), QUESTIONNAIRESt REVIEWS, FALLOUT
SHELTERS. NUCLEAR WARFARE (U)
AN OVER*hELMING MAJORITY OF AMERICANS INDICATED
IN JUNE 1968 THAT THE COUNTRY WOULD NOT BE ENGAUEDIN A NUCLEAR WAR WJTHIN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, THE
HIGHER THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLASS, THE MORE OPTIMISM
PREVAILED* CONSEQUENTLY PUBLIC INTEREST IN CIVIL
DEFENSE AND RELEVANT INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITY *AS Loas
ALTHOUGH PEOPLE WERE MORE CERTAIN OF WHERE SHELTER
WOULD BE SOUGHT IF A NUCLEAR ATTACK OCCURRED WHILE AT
WORK RATHER THAN AT HOME, FEW PEOPLE HAD GIvEN THE
MATTER SERIOUS THOUGHT, MOST CITIZENS KNEW NOTHING
OF aHAT WAS BEING ACCOMPLISHED BY CIViL DEFENSE
OFFICERS ON THE LOCAL LEVEL. ý'EOPLE APPEARErUNCONCERNED AND REFUSED GENERALLY TO EVALUATE LOCAL
CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS# (AUTHOR) (U)
132
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMmL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Nti, /ZMML7
LAO-712 314 15/3STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
THE USE OF SYSTEMS TECHNIQUES IN CIVILDLFENSE. tUl
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPTy,
MAY 70 186P DEVAriEYJOHN Fe ICONTRACT: DAMC20-67-C-0136Pgoj: GCD-2313A
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: PREi'ARED IN COOPERATION *ITH URSRESEARCH CO., SAN MATEO# CALIF99 REPT9 NO. URS-
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DErENSE SYSTEMS, *SYSTEMSLNGINEERING), RESEARCH PROGROM ADMINISTRATION,STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEWS, TRAINING, BUDGETS,UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, SHELTERS, COSTEFFECTIVENESS (u)
IOENTIFIERS; EVALUATION (U)
CIVIL DLFENSE HAS THE ATTRIWJTES OF A SYSTEM ANDrthE TECHNIQUES OF SYSTEMS EVALUATION HAVE BEENAPPLIED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLICY AND PROGRAMSSINCE TmE MIDDLE 1950'S5 ADVANCES HAVE BEEN MADEIN THE STATE-OF-THE-ART OF CIVIL DEFENSE AND OFSYSTEMS EVALUATION, APPLICATION OF SYSTEMSEVALUATION TECHNIQUES TO CIVIL DEFENSE IS REVIE*ED.A MODIFIED ANALYTIC FRAME*ORK 15 PRESENTED 4ITHDEFINITIONS, GRAPHIC AIDS, AND A QUALITATIVEDEMONSTRATION OF THE METHOD AND OF TIS APPLICATION ToOTHER ACTIVITIES SUCH A5: OPERATIONAL PLANNING,ORGANIZATIONt TRAINING, AND 50 ON. (AUTHOR) (U)
1U 3
UNCLA5SIPIED IZMMI.?
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /LMML7
AQ-714 991 13/12 5/11 15/3
OHIO STATE UNIV COLUMBUS LISASTER RESEARCH CENTER
THE *ARNING SYSTEM IN DISASTERSITUATIONS: A SELECTIVE ANALYSIS* (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTEI RESEARCH REPT.,jUL 7U 78P MCLUcKIEsBENjAMIN Fe I
REpT. NO. ORC-SER-9CUNTRACT: UCD-PS"64-46
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
OLSCRIPTOmS: (9DISASTERS, *WARNING SYSTEMS),CIvIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,
REACTIONIPSYCHOLOGY), FACTOR ANALYSIS,CLASSIFICATION, STATISTICAL UATA, TIME,MANAGEMENT PLANNING, DAMAGE, CONTROL SYSTEMS,THREAT EVALUATION, DECISION MAKING, DATAPROCESSING SYSTEMS9 COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, NUCLEAREXPLOSIONS (U)
IN MANY WAYS *ARNING CAN BE THE MOST IMPORTANTPHASE OF THE DISASTER RESPONSE. WARNING IS THOU.HTOF IqOT jUST IN TERMS OF MECHANICAL DEVICES BUT INTERMS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL STRUCTURESAND PROCESSES. WARNING IS NOT ONLY ADVANCENOTIFICATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF DANGER BUT ALSOINFORMATION ABOUT WHAT CAN BE DONE TO PREVENT, AVOID,OR MINIMIZE THE DAN4ER, THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THEDISASTER AGENT -- FREQUENCY, SPEED OF ONSET, SCOPE OFIMPACT, DESTRUCTIVE POTENTIAL, ETC* o- AFFECT THEWARNING PROCESS, BEFORE A WARNING MESSAGE CAN BEISSUED, THREAT DATA MUST BE COLLECTED# COLLATED, ANDEVALUATED. THE REPORT EXAMINES NHAT IS INVOLVED INTHESE PROCESSES, INCLUDED AMONG THE FACTORSINFLUENCING RESPONSE ARE THE SOCIO-CULTuRALFRAME*ORK, THE HISTORICAL SETTINGe AND THE IMMEDIATEONGOING SOCIAL SITUATION. THE REPORT CONTAINS ADISCUSSION OF IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE.(AUTHOR) (U)
134
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
f UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO@ /ZMML7
AAU-718 881 15/3 5/9
URS RESEARCH CO SAN MATEO CALIF
EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS SIMULATIONTRAINING. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT,,NOV 70 79P HARKERROBERT A, 1
REpT. NO* URS-793CONTRACT: DAHC20-70-C-0293PROJ: OCD-26IIE
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: :eCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, TRAINING),NUCLEAR AARFAREq SiMULATiON. THREAT EVALUATION,PROBLEM SOLVING, LEADERSHIP, ORGANIZATIONS,INTERACTIONS, PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION (U)
IUENTIFIERS; TRANSATTACK ENVIRONMENTS, *EMERGENCYOPERATIONS SIMULATION TRAINING, ENEMY ATTACKCAPABILITIES, OBJECTIVES, EVALUATION, NEWORLEANS(LOUISIANA) (U)
THE REPORT PRESENTS EVALUATIONS OF THE OCDEMERGENCY OPERATIONS SIMULATION TRAINING(EOST) EXERCISES CONDUCTED FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS,THE EVALUATIONS WERE BASED ON OBSERVATION ANDPARTICIPATION IN FIVE EXERCISES AS iELL AS ONANALYSES OF THE EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE OF OTHERS, INADDITION, THE RESEARCH INCLUDED EST:MATES OF CURRENTENEMY ATTACK CAPABILiTS'E, AND STUDIES OF ADVANCEDCIVIL DEFENSE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENTS,(AUTHOR) (U)
135
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
p7I
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
AD-718 921j 5/11 15/3MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING DEPT OFCOMMUNICATION
THE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION SURVEY INMICHIGAN: ITS IMPACT ON THE GENERALPUBLIC# (U)
APR 7U 1ZP BERLOvDAVID K. IREpT. NO. HFPS-3CONTRACT: UAHC2O-67-C-Ol19
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REPORT ON THE PUBLIC OPINION ONSHARING HOME BASEMENTS DURING STORM ORRALOIOACT!VL FALLOUT DISASTERS*
DESCRIPTORS: (•DISASTERS# ATTITUDES),(OSHELTERS# PUBLIC OPINION), STORMS,RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSo SOCIALCOMMUNICATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (U)
IDENTIFIERS: SHELTER OCCUPANCY, HOME BASEMENTS,EMERGENCY HOME SHARING, INTERVIE*S (U)
THE REPORT FOCUSES ON THE RESPONSES MADE BY ASTATE-WIDE PROBABILITY SAMPLE OF MICHIGAN RESIDENTSTO wUESTIONS DEALING WITH THEIR WILLINGNESS TO SHARETHEIR HOME BASEMENTS-IN THE EVENT OF NATURALDISASTER, OR NUCLEAR ATTACK, WITH EITHER FRIENDS,NEIGHBORS, OR STRANGERS, SUBGROUPS OF THEPOPULATIOm WERE STUDIED IN RESPONSE TO THESEQUESTIONS: A WIDE VARIETY OF SUBGROUPS WERE EXAMINEDALONG DIFFERING LEVELS OF CIVIL DEFENSE ATTITUDES ANDINFORMATION, COMMUNICATIONS WITH RESPECT TO CIVILDEFENSE, AND DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS, THE FINDINGS WERETHEN COMPARED WITH SIMILAR wUESTIONS ASKED IN OTHERMID-WEST URBAN AND RURAL AREAS, AND IN A NATION-WIDEPROBABILITY SAMPLE1 ALL THREE SETS OF RESULTSCONSISTENTLY SHOWED HIGH LEVELS OF PUBLIC SUPPORT FORHOMESHARING IN THE EVENT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK.(AUTHOR) IU)
136
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMmL7
UNCLASSIFIEDUDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
Au-722 87U 5/1DEFENSE DUCUMENTATION CENTER ALEXANDRIA VA
MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY JAN-OCT 70.APR 71 2OIPREPT. NO. DDC-TAS..71"S
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (eMANAGEMENT EN6INELRINGooBIBLIOGRAPHIES)o (*MANAGEMENT PLANNING,bIBLIOGRAPHIES), ABSTRACTS, INDEXES#TRANSPORTATION, INDUSTRIES, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS,DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMSo MATHEMATICAL PREDICTION,FALLOUT SHELTERS, TRANSPORTATION, INVENTORYCONTROL9 URBAN PLANNING, DLCISION MAKING#LOGIsTICS
(U)IUENTIFIERS: MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS,
ANNOTATEu BIBLIOgRAPHIEs (U)
THE ABSTRACTS TO REPORTS IN THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY AREPERTINENT TO MANAGEMENT PLANNINU IN TRANSPORTATION*INDUSTRIES, CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, AND OTHER MAN-ORGANIZED SYSTEMS. THE INDEAES ARE FOR CORPORATeAUTHOR-MONITORING AGENCY AND SUBJECT. (AUTHOR) (U)
137
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DUC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CoNTROL No* /ZMML7
AU-724 164 15/3
MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING DEPT OFCOMMUNICATION
THE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION SURVEY ANDCOMMUNITY SHELTER PLANS liq MICHIGAN:THEIR IMPACT ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC. FAMILYCOMMUNICATION ABOUT CIVIL DEFENbE TOPICS:A REPORT OF TWO PILOT STUDILS, (U)
DLSCRIPTIvE NOTE: PILOT STUDY REPT, NOO 4sJAN 71 19P bEHLODAVID K. ;mACKMANo
DANIEL Be IERICSONsPHILIP MeCONTRACT: DAHCZO-67-C0119
UNCLASSIFIED HEPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUeLICOPINION), (*FALLOUT SHELTERS, CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS), REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY), EDUCATION*ATTITUDES, QUESTIONNAIRES, NUCLEAR RADIATION.I4UCLEAR AARFARE (U)
IDENTIFIERS: HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION SURVEYS (U)
THE REPORT SUMMARIZES TOO PILOT RESEARCH STUDIESWHICH EXPLORED HOW AMERICAN FAMILIES PROCE 1 ANDUTILIZE CIVIL DEFLNSE INFORMATION* THE FIRjT STUDYCOMPAREu PUBLIC REACTIONS TO COMMUNITY SHELTERPLAN INFORMATION TO HOME FALLOUT PROTECTIONSURVEY INFORMATION1 AND FOUND THEM SIMILAR IN
AhARENESS, PROCESSING, USE IN PLANNING, ANDEVALUATION OF THE INFOPMATION, THE STRENGTHs ANDWEAKNESS OF CSP INFORMAIION ARE NOTED. THESLCOND STUDY EXAMINED HOW A SAMPLE OF 30 LOwER ANDMIDULE CLASS COUPLES INTERACTED ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSETOPICS. THE FINDINGS INDICATED NUCLEAR ROLEASSIGNMENT FOR CIVIL DEFENSE IN THE FAMILIEqo LOWPRIORITY TO ITS IMPORTANCE, BUT USE OF THE SAME BASICINTERACTION STYLE IN DISCUSSING IT, (AUTHOR) (U)
138
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML?7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO /iLMML7
AD-724 727 lb/3104A STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY AND
ANTHROPoLoGY
THE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION SURVEY ANDRESULTING CHANGES IN SHELTER ADOPTION,SUMMARY REPORT* (U)
DeSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPTe,SEP 70 S&P YARBROUGHPAUL iKLONGLAN,
GERALD Ee IREPT. NO. RURAL SOCIOLOGY-b5ACONTRACT: DAHC20-67-C-Ol23PROJ: OCD-98IIE
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REPORT ON SOCIOLOGICAL STUDIES INCIVIL DEFENSE. PREPARED IN COOPERATION 6ITH IONAAGRICULTURAL AND HOME ECONOMICS EXPERIMENTSTATION, PRO.ECT 1529. SEE ALSO APPENDICES, aD-724 728.
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ATTITUDES),WUESTIONNAIRES, REVIEWS, IOWA (U)
IoENTIFIEkS; SURVEYS, HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION (U)
THE STUoY INVESTIGATED RESPONSES MADE BY ADULTS INDES MOINES, IOWA, TO THE HOME FALLOUTPROTECTION SURVEY (HFPS)s A PANEL OF 308PER$ONS WERE INTERVIEWED BEFORE AND AFTER HFPS.THE AUDIENCE WAS FOUND TO HAVE RESPONDED QUITEFAVORABLY IN TERMS OF ATTENTION GIVEN MFPSMESSAGES, ATTITUDINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROGRAM ANDCHANGE IN ADOPTION OF PUBLIC AND HOME FALLOUTSHELTERS. OVER 66 PERCENT WERE AWARE OF THEPRO6RAM AND NEARLY 30 PERCENT READ AT LEAST SOME OFTHE HFPS BOOKLET. COMBINED ADOPTION OF HOME ANDPUBLIC SHELTERS Irm.REASED FROM 26 PERCENT OF A66HOUSEHOLDS BEFORE HFPS TO 44 PERCENT AFTERWARDS.HOdEVERs COMPREHENSION OF SUCH KEY CONCEPTS ASsPROTECTION FACTOR, AND 'ADDED WEIGHT* WAS QUITE LOWAND CONSTITUTED ONE OF fHE hEAKEST LINKS IN THEPROGRAM. THE DISPOSITIONAL MODEL DID NOT HOiD AELLIN PREDICTING ATTENTION TO HFPS, BUT DID HOLD INPREDICTING COMPREHENSION AND ACCEPTANCE RESPONSES.THE USE OF PANEL METHODOLOGY WAb FOUND TOCONTRIBUTE SIGNIFICANT BIAS TO THE ODSERVED RESPONSETO tFPSe (AUTHOR) (U)
139
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML?
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CUNTROL No. /ZHML7
AU-726 001 11/5 21/2 15/6NAVAL ORDNANCE LAB WHITE OAK MD
FUEL VALUES AND BURNING TIMES OF SELECTEDFUEL ARRAYS. iU)
PLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT*,MAR 71 17P 6RACCIAVENTI1JOHN
REpTo NO. NOLTR-71-76PROJ: OCO-2535B
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DLSCRIPTORS; (eTEXTILES# OCOMBUSTION)t(eBUILDINGS, FIRES), (*NUCLEAR WARFARE, URBANAREAS), CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, HOUSING, FIRE
SAFETY, FIRE RESISTANT TEXTILES, FLAMMABILITY,BURNING RATE (U)
IaENTIFIERS: *CURTAINS# *DRAPES, *WINDO0SHADES (U)
FUEL VALUES AND BURNING TIMES OF SEVENTEEN SELECTEDWINDOW FUEL ARRAYb *ERE DETERMINED EXPERIMENTALLY FORCONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE ARRAYS ARE COMMONLY FOUND#
THE RESULTS 4ERE COMPARED wITH PREDICTEg FUELVALUES ANU BURNINU TIMES MADE IN CONJUNCTION WITHSURVEYS OF PROVIDENCE AND DETROIT, THE RESULTSINDICATE THAT THE FUEL VALUES FOR THE BURNING ARRAYSARE ON THE AVERAGE 0 PERCENT LOWER THAN THOSEpREUICTEDo THE FLAMING TIME OF THE FUELS aAS FOUNDTO oE TnICE TO SIX TIMES THUSE PREDICTEOS MO6EVER THEHAN(3ING FUELS FELL TO THE FLOUR IN CONSIDERABLYSHORTER TIMES THAN THE ESTIMATED BURNING TIMES.SOME OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE RESULTS TO ROOMFLASHOVER ARE DISCUSSED. (AUTHOR) (U)
140
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CUNTROL NO, /ZMML7
AU-726 456 15/1 5/10
AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESLARCH PITTSBURGH PA
AN EXPLORATORY STUDY TO DETERMINE THEEFFECTS OF PHYSICAL HAZARD oN SHELTERMANAGEMENT BEHAVIORo (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT. 1969"19701APR 71 6yP SMITHvRO8ERT We ICOLLINSo
ROBERT A* IMEAGLEYDONALD Es IRLPTo NO. AIR-77802$-/71'FRCUNTRACT: DAHCZO-68-C-0122
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, FALLOUTbHELTERS)t (oBEHAVIOR* THREAT EVALUATION),
(OFALLOUT SHELTERSo *MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING),PERFORMANCE(HUMAN), REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY),STRESS(PSYCHOLOGY)o ADJUSTMENT(PSYCHOLOGY)iANXIETY (U)
IDENTIFIERS: THREAT, MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE (U)
THE OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY AAS TO GENERATE APERCEPTION oF EiqVIRONMENTAL THREAT IN SUBJECTS UNDERCONTROLLED CONDITIONS AND TO ASSESS ITS EFFECT ONPERFORMANCE THAT COULD BE RELATED TO FALLOUT SHELTERMANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES. OF THE TEN TESTSUBJECTS# FIVE APPEARED TO PERCEIVE THREAT AS
EVIDENCED by NONCOMMITTAL REACTIONS TO CONCERNSEXPRESSED BY THEIR COMPANIONS, OVERT SYMPTOMS OFANXIETY* RELATIVELY FREQUENT ATTEMPTS TO COMMUNICATE*ITH THE RESEARCH STAFFs AND SUBSEQUENT VERBALACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PERCE!VEU THREAT* CLEARRELATIONSnIPS EXISTED BEThEEN THE PERCEPTION OF
ThREAT ANU MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE, PARTICULARLY IN
THE AREA OF SOCIAL 6EHAVIOR. (AUTHOR) (U)
gI
I
141
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
I_
UNCLASSIFIED
UOC REPOkT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTRU, NOe /ZMML7
AU-726 947 15A3OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE WASHINGTON U C
CIVIL DEFENSE AND THE PUBLIC: ANOVERVIEo OF PUBLIC ATTITUDE STUUIES (IU)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE; FINAL REPT.,MAY 71 '4UP GARRETT*RALPH Le
REpTe NO. OCD-RR-17
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS; ,*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ePUBLICOPINION), (*ATTITUDES# CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSIIHISTORY. SHELTERS, EDUCATION. MANAGEMENT
PLANNING (U)
THE REPORT OUTLINES RELEVANT ASPECTS OF CIVIL
DEFENSE HISTORY AND PROVIDES A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF
PUBLIC ATTITUDES OURING THE PAST 20 YEARS. PUBLIC
ATTITUDE FINDINGS ARE SUMMARIZED UNDER SUCH TOPICS AS
-rHE INTERNATIONAL CUNTEAT, THREAT PERCEPTION# GENERALFAVORABILITY, PROGRAM SUFPokT, 5ALILNCE, PERCEPTIONSOF LOCAL PROGRAMS9 PERCEPTIONS OF SHELTERS AS A
SURVIVAL RESOURCE, RESPONSE TO WARNING. AND TRAINING
AND EDUCATION IMPACT. FINDINGS ARE REVIEWEDkELEVANT TO SUCH SPECIAL AUDIENCES AS INFORMATIONSLEKERS. YOUTH, LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES, COMMUNITYPOWER STRUCTURE, AND VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS*PROJECTIONS ARE MADE RELATIVE TO THE MEANING OF
THESE FINUINGS FOR CIVIL DEFENSE IN THE 19 7o'S.
(AUTHORl (U)
142
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMmL7
UNCLASSIFIEDUDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NOt /ZmML7
Au-726 955 15/3 6/7 6/21SYSTEM SCIENCES INC BETHESDA MD
A CONCEPT OF EMER(ENCY HEALTH SERVICE(EMS) IN NUCLEAR WARe PART I - PLANNINGFOR EHS IN NUCLEAR WAR, AND PART I1
DEVELOPING AN EMS ANNEX TO A NUCLEAR
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN (NEOP)e (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE FINAL REPTa,jUL 71 22bP ANDERSONCHANLES Ge
CUNTRACT: OAHC20-70-CO3U2
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DLSCRIPTORS; (*NUCLEAR 4ARFARE CASUALTIES, ePUBLICHEALTH), (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, PUBLICHEALTH), NUCLEAR WARFARE, MEDICAL PERSONNEL,MEDICAL SUPPLIES (U)
IoENTIFIERS: *EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE (U)
THE REPORT PRESENTS A GENERAL DISCUSSION OF MEDICAL
DISASTER PLANNING, EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE(EH)S ORGANIZATION, POTENTIAL ATTACK ENVIROh.MENTSAND CASUALTY CARE REQUIREMENTS. THE ELEMENTS OFTHE EMS ARE ALL DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF APPLICATIONDURING ANY ONE OF THE POSSIBLE DIFFERENT TYPES OF
ATTACK 6ASIC OPERATING SITUATIONS (80)S. ACONCEPT OF PLANNING FOR EMERGENCY MEDICALOPERATIONS DURING AND IMMEDIATELY AFTER A NUCLEARATTACK IS DISCUSSED@ IT COVERS THE ASPECTS OFMLOICAL MANPOwER. MEDICAL SuPPLiES AND MEDICALFACILITIES A14D mOn THEY COULD BE INTERRELATED DURINGEMERGENCY OPERATIOI'S, SUBSTANTIAL EMPHASIS ISGIVEN OVER TO INCREASED READINESS ACTIVITIESDURING A CRISIS BUID UP PERIOD, (AUTHOR) (U)
143
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
LDL REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZMML7
AU-726 961 5/10 bll lb13HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC mcLLAN VA
A MODEL OF SOCIETY TO USE IN SYSTEMATICANALYSIS ANO MANAGEMENT PLANNING FORSOCIETIES UNDER STRLSS: FURTHERDLVLLOPMENTo (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL HEPT.,MAY 71 131P HALLoEARL Es I
REPT, NO. hSR-RR-71/4'VB-XCONTRACT: DAHC20-68-C-OlblPRO.: OCD- 432IC
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: 5E ALSO REPORT DATED NOV 69a AD-7o0 166s
DLSCRIPTORS: (*NUCLEAR 4ARFARE, IECOVERy),(*CIVIL LEFENSE SYSTEMS, eMANAGEMENT PLANNING),MATMLMATICAL MODELS, ECONOMICS, SYSTMS Alt(NbINEERIN(, EQUATIONS, FACTOR ANALYSIS, BEHAVIOR (U)
IuENTIFIERS: POST ATTACK PLANNING (U)
THE REPURT DESCRIbES FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF ASYSTEMS MODEL OF SOCIETY TO BE USED AS A TOOL INPLANNING FOR SOCIETAL RECOVERY FOLLOWING NUCLEARATTACK. THE BASIC ELEMENTS OF THE SYSTEM *ENEPRESENTED IN AN EARLIER REPORT, A MODEL OFSOCIETY TO USE IN SYSTEMATIL ANALYSIS AND
MANAGEMLNT PLANNING FOR SCCIETIES UNDERSTRESS; THE PRESENT REPORT EMPHASIZES THE NEEDSsYSTEMS-EFFORTS EWUATIONS OF THE SOCIETAL MODEL ANDCOVERS IN DETAIL THL GENERAL SYSTEMIC IMPLICATIONSOF SPECIFIC HUMAN NEEDS; IMPLICATIONS FOR THECUl4SUMER DEMAND SUBbYSTLM; IMPLICATIONS FOR THEINSTITUTIUN-dUILDIN(4 SUdSYSTEM; AND GENERALIMPLICATIONS FOR RECOVERY PLANNING, THE REPORTCONCLUDES WITH ý DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THESOCIAL SCIENCES RELATED TO THE POrENTIAL OF SOCIETALMODELING. (AUTHOR) (U)
144
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
UDC REPORT BIBLIOGkAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO /IZMML7
AU-728 848 15/3
IOWA STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY ANDANTHROPOLOGY
PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY SHELTERPLANNING: DES MOINES AND POLK COUNTY,10%Ao SUMMARY REPORT* (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT.,MAY 71 SUP YARBROUGH9PAUL 1KLON4LANt
GLRALD E9 1PAD6|T71STEVE I
REpT. NO* SOCIOLOGY-6 7 ACONTRACT: DAHC20-69-C-OlU3PROj: OCD-8I1G
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REPORT ON SOCIOkOGICAL STUDIES INCIVIL DEFENSE* PREPARED IN COOPERATION wITH IOWAAGrICULTURAL AND HOME ECONOMICS EXPERIMENT
STATION, PROJECT 1754o SEE ALSO APPENDICES, AD-726 8499
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ATTITUDES),
(*FALLOUT SHELTERS, eATTITUDES), QUESTIONNAIRES,SOCIOLOGY (U)
THE STUoY R¢ESTIaATED RESPONSES MADE BY ADQLTS IN
DES MOINES, IOWA, TO A COMMUNITY SHELTERPLAN (CSP) AND ALSO TO AN OFFICE OF CIVILDEFENSE BOOKLET ENTITLE0, IIN TIME OFEMERGENCY' (H-1'l. A TOTAL OF 938 INTERVIEWSWERE COMPLETED DURING THE STUDY* THE DETAILEDMETHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS FCR EACH VARIABLEINVESTIGATEDs IS PRESENTED IN A SEPARATE VOLUME--SEE
AU-7 2 8 849o (AUTHOR) (U)
145
SUNCLASSIFIED /ZMML7
--- A
-~ -~-±-~--~t- ~- ~7~~ Y. -,--~- --- 7-----UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NUo /ZMML 7
AU-728 849 15/3IOWA STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY AND
ANTHROPOLOGY
PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY SHLLTERPLANNING: DES MOINES ANU POLK COUNTY,
lOtA, APPENDICES* (U)
DLSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT,,MAY 71 34'P YARBROUGmsPAUL ;KLONGLANt
GERALD E* IPADGITTSTEvE I
REPT. NO. SOCIOLOGY-BBCONTRACT; DAHC20-69-C-OI3PROJ: OC0-q811G
UNwCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REPORT ON SOCIOLOGICAL STUDIES IN
CIVIL DEFENSE. PREPARED IN COOPERATION AITH IOWA
AGRICULTURAL AND HOME ECONOMICS EXPERIMENT
STATION, PROJECT 1754o SEE ALSO SUMMARY REPORT,
AD-728 848o
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ATTITUUES);
(*FALLOUT SkELTERSt *ATTITUDES)$ QUESTIONNAIRES,
SOCIOLOGY (U)
THE STUoY INVESTIGATED RESPONSES MADE BY ADULTS IN
DES MOINES, IO*A. TO THE COSMUNITY SHELTER
PLAN (CSP)# A TOTAL OF 938 INTERVIEWS AERECOMPLETED OURIN4 THE STUDj, THIS INCLUDED ADEQUATE
CONTROL SAMPLES BEFORE AND AFTEN PUBLICATION OF CS1
AS NELL AS PANELS. ONE PANEL *AS INITIATED gEFORECSPI OTHER *ERE CONTINUED FROM THE RESEARCHERS'
EARLIER HOME FALLOUT PROTZCTION SURVEY STUDY,THE CSP MESSAGE INCLUDED A PLAN ALLOCATING PUBLIC
FALLOUT SHELTERS TO RESIDENTS BASED ON PLACE OFRESIDENCE. IT *AS PUBLISHED IN THE FORM OF A 12-PAGE SUNDAY NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT.
ATTEN1ION GIVEN THE MESSAGE WAS ABOUT AVERAGE *ITHSIMILAR SUPPLEMENTS (SLIGHTLY LESS THAN HALF OF THETOTAL AUDIENCE). BUT COMPREHENSION OF THE PLAN NAS
L0 4, ONLY SEVEN PERCENT OF OUR CONTROL SAMPLECULLD RECALL THE NAME ON LOCATIUN OF A SHELTER
ALLOCATED FOR HIS USE AND O,,LY FOUR PERCENT COULDRECALL mOo THEY *LRL !NSTeUCTED TO TRAVEL TC THESMELTER, ACCEPTANCE RESPONSES WLRE LOW. A SLIGHT
INCREASE *Ab OBSERVtD IN LEVEL uF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT A
LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM AND IN THE ANTICIPATORY
DECIbION TO CONCURRENTLY ADOPT PUBLIC OR HOME SMELTER
PROTECTION ALTERNATIVES. THL DISPOSITIONAL MODEL
DID NOT HOLD WELL IN PREDICTING ATTENTION TO CSP, (U)
146UNCLASSIFIED /ZMiiL7
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7
Au-73U 360 S/lUHUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN VA
A STUDY OF CONSENSUS ON PcYCHOLOGICAL FACTORSRELATED TO RECOVERY FROM NUCLEAR ATTACK- (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPTe,MAY 71 2314P ALLNuTTBRUCE C, INORDLIE9
PETER Go IRLPTo NO. HSR-RR-71/3-DICONTRACT: DAHCZ0-70-C-O3BOPRoj: OCD-35'Z8
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (OREACTION(PSYCHOLOGY)o NUCLEAR6ARFARE). RECOVERY, SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,SOCIOLOGY, AOJUSTMENT(PSYCHOLOGY)s FACTORANALYSIS. CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSt LABOR (U)
IOENTIFIERS: *POSTATTACK RECOVERY (U)
A STUDY WAS MADE OF THE AGREEMENT THAT EXISTS AMONGEXPERTS ABOUT THE PROBABLE SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICALCONSEQUENCES OF NUCLEAR WAR, AND THE IMPACT OF SUCHFACTORS ON THE PROCESS OF NATIONAL RECOVERY. THE
V[ RESEARCH METHOD INVOLVED THE INTERROGATION OF A PANELoF COGNIZANT GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, MILITARY OFFICERS,AND RESEARCH SCIENTISTSs USING A VARIATION oF THEITERATIVE DELPHI PROCEDURE. VERY GENERALLY. THEPANEL *AS IN AGRrEMENT THAT, WHILE THE VARIETY OFINDIVIDUAL AND GROUP BEHAVIORS COULD BE EXPECTED TOINCREASE, THE INCIDLNCE OF ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR WOULDLIKELY OUTWEIGH THAT OF MALADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR.HO*EVER A VERY STRONG TENDENCY FOR SOCIAL SYSTENSTO FRAGMENT INTO SMALL, LOCAL, SHORT-SIGHTEDs AND
StLFoINTERESTED GROUPS WAS PREDICTED@ A DIVERSE SETOF PROJECTIONS ARE PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED IN DEPTHBY THE PANELISTS, AND ESTIMATIONS OF THE EFFECTS OFSOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS ON SUCH NUMERICALVARIABLES AS THE POSTATTACK AVAILABILITY OF LABOR AREGIVEN. (AUTHOR) (U)
147
UNCLASSIFIED /ZM mL,
UNCLASSIFIED
DOC REPORT aIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NOo /ZMML7
Au-732 514 13/13 15/3
AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESLARCH PITTSBURGH PA
MODEL LARGE INDIVIDUAL SHELTER PLANS. (U)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT. 1 JUL 70-3U SEP 71s
jUL 71 149P COLLINStROBERT A* IMANN9SHEILA Be Z
REPT. NO. AIR-77804-7/71-FRCONTRACT: DAHC20-68-C-0122PROJ: OCU-1S19F
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
DESCRIPTORS: (*SHELTERS$ *CIvIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS),HANAGEMENT PLANNING, PENNSYLVANIA (U)
IjENTIFIERS: PITTSBURGH(PENNSYLVANIA) (U)
THE GOALS OF THE PROJECT *ERE TO DEVELOP ANINDIVIDUAL SHELTER PLAN (ISP) FOR 4PERATIONS WITHINTHE LARGE SHELTER, AND A REPORT DESCRIPTIVE OF THEPROCESSES OF PLAN DEVELOPMENT* A tMODELf STRUCTURE,SATISFYING THE CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE OF $LARGE'SHELTERS oAS SELECTED* THIS BUILDING WAS SURVEYEDIN TERMS OF STRUCTURE, SUPPLIES, FACILITIES# ANDEQUIPMENT PERTINENT TO ITS FUNCTION AS A SHELTEN.UTILIZING THIS INFORMATION, AND LEVELS OF FIRE ANDRADIATION AS ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTORS$ SHELTERMANAGEMENT ACTIONS *ERE GENERATED FOR CRITICALSHELTER SERVICES. THESE ACTIONS WERE FORMATTED INA SMALL FLIP CHART ARRANGED FCR EASY ACCESS.(AUTHOR) (U)
148
UNCLASSIFiED /ZMML7
UNCLASSIFIED
CDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO* /ZtML7
Au-732 948 1/3 12/2FAUCETT (JACK) ASSOCIATES SILVER SPRING MD
APPLICATIONS OF NET*ORK ANALYSIS To CIVILDEFENSE OPERATIONSt (UI
DaSCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL HEPT,AUG 71 54P
CuITPACT: DAHC20-71-C'0219PNOJ: OCo-4114C
UNCLASSIFIED REPORT
SUPPLLHENTARY NOTE: INCLUDES DETaCHABLE SUMMARY. SEE
ALSO RELATED REPORT DATED DEC 70, AD-719 3Zt:
DESCRIPTORS: (*CIVIL VEFENSE SYSTEMS, *OPERATIONSRESEARCH)* (ONUCLEAR WARFARE, DAMAGEASSESSMENT), LINEAR PROGRAMMING. TRANS;'ORTATIONgDEBRIS# EVACUATION, MEDICAL sUPPLIE$sMATHEM4TICAL HODELS, PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNcTIONStCRAPHICS, DISASTERS, COSTS, OPTIMIZATION (U)
IDENTIFIERS: *NETWORK FLOWSt RESOURCE ALLOCATION,LMERGENCY PLANNING# TRANSPORTATION MODELStCONSTRAINTS, GRAPH THEORY (U)
THE REPORT EXPLORES THE APPLOCATIONS OF NET*CRKANA6YSIS TO CIVIL DEFENSE EMERGENCY PLANNING.NETWORK ANALYSIS WAb USED TO DEVELOP MODELS TOANALYZE POST-DISASTER SURVIVAL AND RECOVERYOPERATIONSt WITH SAMPLE PROBLEMS BEINS PRESENTED TOILLUSTRATE THE UTILITY OF THESE MODELS TO CIVILDEFENSE PLANNING* ONE EXAMPLE SHOWED HOW A MODELCOULD BE USED TU DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATEDISTRIBUTION OF EMERGENCY RESOURCES DURING POST-DISASTER SURVjVp. PERIODS, ANOTHER ENAHPLEDEMONSTRATED HOa A -SARGCU-ALE POST-DISASTER RECOVERYPROBLEM COULD BE SOLVEDo fHAT 159 THE CPT1MAL LEVELOF MULTIPLE PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THE OPTIMALLEVEL OF PRODUCTION AT EACH LOCATION WAS DETERMINEDIN ORDER TO MINIMIZE TRANSPORTATION COSTS. IT WASALSO SHOWN THAT INFORPATION FROM THE NATIONALNODAL NlýTWORK SISTEM CAN SERVE AS INPUTS TOSUCH MCOELS, (AUTOOR$ (U)
149
UNCLASSIFIED /ZMML?
UNCLASSIFIED
CORPORATE AUTHOR - MONITORING AGENCY
*AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH OPERATIONS-PITTSBURGH PA AD-601 930
AIR-77802-4/71-FR CIVIL DEFENSE COURSEAN EXPLORATORY STUDY TO DEVELOPMENT TECHNICUES. A COURSS IN
DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL STATE LE'IEL CIVIL DEFENSE STAFcHAZARD ON SHELTER MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS.BEHAVIOR* AD-601 931
AD-726 456* 8* • ASS TRAINING TE~uNIQUES Iff
AIR-77804-7/71-FR CIVIL DEFENSE. II. A FURTHER STUDYMODEL LARGE INDIVIDUAL SHELTER OF TELEPHONIC ADJUNCT TRAINING.
PLANS. AD-619 657AD-732 514 *8*
*8 * MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING
AIR C92 6 63TR ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATIONS =ORREQUIRýMENTS AND METHODS FOR THE CIVIL DEFENSE ORGANIZATION,
IMPROVING LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE AD-622 714TRAININg,AD-410 515 *BUREAU OF THE CENSUS WASHINGTON 0 C
*AMERICAN MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION FG-D-3.1/IWASHINGTON D C NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCD-
* * * OEP REGION 1."ORGANIZING MUNICIPAL AD-631 756
GOVERNMLNTS FOR CIVIL DEFENSE, *t*AD-426 430 FG-D-3.1/2
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCD-*APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES WAYNE OEP REGION 2.
PA AD-631 757
A CORE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR FG-D-3.1/3STATE LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCD-
PERSONNEL (APPENDICES)i OEP REGION 3.AD-403 670 AD-631 758
A CORE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR FG-D-3.114STATE LLVEL CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM NATIONAL LOCATION COOE. OCD-PERSONNEL'# OEP REGION 4.
AD-403 759 AD-631 759
5TANDAROIZED TESTING FOR THE FG-D'-3o/5OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE NATIONAL LOCATION CODE, OCO-OEPRADIOLOGICAL MONITORING FOR REGION 5.INSTRUCTORS COURSE. AD-631 760
AD-601 214 **$ $ * P0-D-S.,1/6
CIVIL DEFENSE COURSE NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCn-OEPDEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES. REGION 6.INSTRUCTOR'S GUIDE FOR A COURSE IN AD-631 761STATE LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE STAFF * * *
0-1UNCLASSIFIED
I
UNCLASSIFIEDCOL-FED
SFG-0-3 1/7 RESEARCHP CLINICAL MANAGEMENT ANDNATIONAL LOCATION CODE# OCD-OEP PLANNINGP
REGION 7, AD-632 595AD-631 7b2
* * * *DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON DFG-D-3*1/8 C
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE# OCD-OEP RAS20REGION 8. TRAMS-2600
AD-631 7b3 ACTIONS OF THE POPULATION IN ARURAL AREA WHEN THE CIVIL DEFENSE
*COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK BUREAU OF SIGNALS ARE GIVEN.APPLIED SOCIAL RESEARCH AD-669 989
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND THE *DUNLAP AND ASSOCIATES INC DARIENFALLOUT-SHELTER ISSUE (A NINE- CONNCOMMUNITY SURVEY). VOL. I, THESTUDY DESIGN AND THE STUDY SSD-65-245 (546)COMMUNITIES# TRAINING REQUIPEMENTS FOR
AD-600 751 POSTATTACK ADAPTIVF BEHAVIOR,* * * AD-624 870
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND THEFALLOUT-SHELTER ISSUE (A NINE- *DUNLAP AND ASSOCIATES INC DARIENCOMMUNITY SURVEY)* VOL* 1. A CONN
SUMMARY OF METHODS. FINDINGSz AND * * *IMPLICATIONS. TESTING CIVIL DEFENSE PLANS AND
AD-600 752 OPERATIOfJS AT THE FEDERAL# STATEAND LOCAL LEVELS.
*CORNELL UNIV ITHACA N Y AD-408 967
THE USE OF VOLUNTARY DRD-64-1IO VOL. 1ORGANIZATIONS IN CIVILIAN DEFENSE REGUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL PLANNINGAND PREPAREDNESSt TO COVER HAZARDS OF FALLOUT.
AD-439 612 VOLUME I,AD-611 764
*DEFENSE DOCUMENTATION CENTERALEXANDRIA VA *FAUCETT (JACK) ASSOCIATES SILVER
* * * SPRING MDDDC-TAS-70-45-1
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: SOCIAL APPLICATIONS OF NETWORKIMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING. ANALYSIS TO CIVIL DEFENSEVOLUME I. OPERATIONS.
AD-705 500 AD-732 948
DDC-TAS-71-5 *FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY WASHINGTON DMANAGEMENT ENGINEERING, C
AD-722 870BIBLIOGRAPHIC LIST-1i
*DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION AND DEFENSE READINESS: SELECTEDWELFARE WASHINGTON D C REFERENCES.
* * * AD-640 206REVIEW OF COMBINED TRAUMA:
0-2UNCLASSIFIED
II
I6UNCLASSIFIED
FED-HUM
*FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSE ADMINISTRATION COLLATERAL DAMAGE.WASHINGTON D C AD-602 849
** * ** *
DAMAGE TO CONVENTIONAL AND HI-477-RRSPECIAL TYPES OF RESIDENCES EXPOSED CHANGING PROSPECTSP MISSIONSTO NUCLLAR EFFECTS, AND ROLES FOR CIVIL DEFENSE: 1965-
AD-611 160 1975pAD-613 637
HI-478-RRA NEW LOOK AT THE DFSIGN OF LOW-BUDGET CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS.
AD-622 096
*HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO FULLERTON CALIF
FR-64-16-66*6AUTNEY AND JONES COMMUNICATIONS INC OCD SOFT TARGET STUDY.
WASHINGTON, D C AD-601 467
TR-66.0201.003 *HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN VAINSTALLATION AND TESTItjG OF AN * * *
AUTOMATIC REMOTE RADIOLOGICAL HSA-RR-65/1-CRMONITORING SYSTEM. KINSHIP AND VOLUNTARY
AD-647 350 ORGANIZATION IN POST-THERMONUCLEARATTACK SOCIETY: SOME EXPLORATORY*HUDSON lNST INC HARMON-ON-HUDSON N Y STUDIES,
* * * AD-653 466HI-612-RR
MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR HSR-RR-67/3-CRCRISIS.CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS, SPECIAL PROBLEMS OF CHILDREN IN
AD-642 145 CIVIL DEFENSE PLANNING.* * * AD-654 201
HI-647-RRMETHODOLOGY FOR POSTATTACK HSR-RR-68/12-BE
RESEARCH. INDICATORS OF SOCIAl.AD-639 751 VULNERABILITY: SOCIAL INDICATIRS
* * * IN CIVIL DEFENSE PLANNING ANDHI-777/2-RR EVALUATION,CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE AND AD-6S5 881
DETERREwCE,AD-654 478 HSR-RR-71/3-DI
A STUDY OF CONSENSUS ON*HUDSON INST INC HARMON-ON-HUDSON N I PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATED TO* * * RECOVERY FROM NUCLEAR ATTACK.
STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL ASPECTS AD-730 360OF CIVIL DEFENSE WlTH SPECIALEMPHASIb ON CRISIS SITUATIONS HSR-RR-71/4-VB-X
AD-401 226 A MODEL OF SCCIETY TO USE IN* * * SYE''EMATIC ANALYSIS AND MANAGEVENT361-RR/b PLANNING FOR SOCIETIES UNDER
0-3UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDHUM-lOW
STRESS: FURTHER DEVELOPMENT, AD-612 706AD-726 961
STUDY-S-2!2*HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN VA U. S. CIVIL DEFENSE BEFORE
* * * 1950: THE ROOTS OF PUBLIC LAW 920.RR 63 3 RR AD-637 900
AN APPROACH TO THE STUDY OFSOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF *INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSESNUCLEAR ATTACK ARLINGTON VA PROGRAM ANALYSIS DIV
AD-402 098RP-P-347
*IIT RESEARCH INST CHICAGO ILL ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE• * * NEW ORLEANS METROPOLITAN AREA.
N6059 (IDA/HQ-67-6832)FIRE BEHAVIOR. IGNITION TO AD-664 753
FLASHOVLR. ** *AD-618 414 RP-P-511
ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE*INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES UNITED STATES USING THE COUNTY AS A
ARLINGTON VA FUNCTIONAL BASE.* * * (IDA/HQ-69-10145)
IDA/HQ-67-6832 AD-692 876ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE
NEW ORLEANS METROPOLITAN AREA. *IOWA AGRICULTURAL AND HOME ECONOMICSAD-664 753 EXPERIMENT STATION AMES
IDA/HQ-69-10145 RURAL SOCIOLOGY-40ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND
UNITED STATES USING THE COUNTY AS A CIVIL DEFENSE. A DELIiCATIOrJ OPFUNCTIONAL BASE. COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND AN
AD-692 876 ANALYSIS OF THEIR CIVIL DEFENISEATTITUDES. KNOWLEDGE, BEHAVIORP AND
*INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES SOURCES OF INFORMATION.ARLINGTON VA ECONOMIC AND AD-623 918POLITICAL STUDIES DIV
** RURAL SoCIOLOGY-40SIDA/HQ-bb-3480 COMMUNITY POWEP ACTORS AND
FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSE CIVIL DEFENSE. A nELINEATION OFORGANIZATION: THE RATIONALE OF ITS COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND ANDEVELOPMENT, ANALYSIS OF THEIR CIVIL DEFENSE
AD-612 706 ATTITUDES, KNOWLEDGE* BEHAVIOR, AND*• * * SOURCES OF INFORMATION.
IDA/HQ-65-3756 AD-623 943U. S, CIVIL DEFENSE BEFORE
Sg1950: THE ROOTS OF PUBLIC LAW 920, SR35AD-637 900 COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURE AND
*• * * CIVIL DEFENSE.STUDY S-184 AD-451 013
FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSEORGANIZATION: THE RATIONALE OF ITS *IOWA ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATIONDEVELOPMENT, AMES
0-4UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED IOfl-MIC
POLK COUNTY# IOWA. SUMMARY REPORT.RURAL SOCIOLOGY-34 AD-728 848
SOCIAL ACTION IN CIVIL DEFENSE. * * *THE STRATEGY OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SOCIOLOGY-878IN A COUNTY CIVIL OEFENSE PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITYEDUCATIONAL PROGRAM. SHELTER PLANNING: DES MOINES AND
AD-451 079 POLK COUNTY, IOWA. APPENDICES.AD-728 849
*IOWA STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OFSOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY *MICHIGAN STATE UNXV EAST LANSING
* * ' COLL OF COMMUNICATION ARTSRURAL SOCIOLOGY-242
SYSrEM LINKAGES AMONG WOMEN'S THE FALLOUT PROTECTION ROOK:.ET:ORGANIZATIONS: AN EXPLORATORY (III) A PETHODOLOGICAL COMPARISONSTUDY OF MEMBERSHIP AND LEADEI-SHIP OF PRE-TEST RESPONSES OF THOSE WHOLINKAGES AMONG WOMEN'S FORMAL RESPONDED, REFUSED# OR WERE NOTORGANIZATIONS IN A LOCAL COMMUNITY, REACHABLE ON THE POST-TEST.
AD-651 049 AD-600 438
RURAL SOCIOLOGY-46-S CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS:A SUMMARY OF THE FINAL REPORT (V) CHANGE IN BELIEFS. PART A.
LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES: THEIR AD-600 985RELATION TO CIVIL DEFENSE.
AD-661 048 CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS:* * * (VI) CHANGE IN BELIEFS, PART B.
RURAL SOCIOLOGY-50 AD-600 989A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF
COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURES. A CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTEONS:DELINEATION AND COMPARATIVE (IV. TOPIC APPEALS.ANALYSI' OF POWER STRUCTURES IN AD-600 990FIVE IOwA COMMUNITIES.
AD-670 016 CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS:• * *C(VII) SU!MMARY.
RURAL SOCIOLOGY-50S AD-600 991A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF * *
COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURES: A CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS:DELINEATION AND COMPARATIVE (I) PEACE AND DEFENSE.ANALYSIS OF POWER STRUCTURES IN AD-600 993FIVE IOwA COMMUNITIES.(OCD-4811-E) CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNS:
AD-670 017 (II) SOURCE CREDIBILITY.* * * AD-601 0lu
RURAL SOCIOLOGY-85ATHE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION ARGUMENTATIVE THEMES XN CIVIL
SURVEY AND RESULTING CHANGES IN DEFENSE: (1) A CONTENT ANALYSIS OFSHELTER ADOPTION. SUMMARY REPORT. THE NEW YORK TIMES.
AD-724 727 AD-613 608
SOCIOLOGY-87A BG-1PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY THE EFFECTS OF LOW CREDIBLE
SHELTER PLANNING: DES MOINES AND SOURCES ON MESSAGE ACCEPTANCE:
0-5UNCLASSIFIED
ffi
• I
-IIUNCLASSIFIED
MIC-OFF
FOUR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN D C DEPT oF URBAN STUDIESPERSUASION,
AD-631 613 INTERGOVERNMENTAL CIVIL DEFENSEORGANIZATIONS AND PROGRAMS.
*MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING AD-615 725DEPT OF COMMUNICATION
• * * *NAVAL ORDNANCE LAB WHITE OAK MDTHE DEVELOPMENT OF VALUES AND * * *
BELIEFS IN YOUNG ANZRICANS TO.:ARD NOLTR-71-76FALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. FUEL VALUES AND BURNING TIMFS
AD-637 107 OF SELECTED FUEL ARRAYS.• * * AD-726 001
THE DEVELOPMENT OF VALUES ANDBELIEFS IN YOUNG AMERICANS TOWlARF *OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE WASHINGTON D'FALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. C
AD-637 1b8OCD-4615A
A PILOT STUDY OF YOUNG A STATISTICAL INFORMATIONAMERICANS' BELIEFS AND KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING THE MAGNITUDEABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE. AND SCOPE OF NUCLEAR ATTACKS.(OCD-4861-C) AD-668 938
AD-670 986OCD-4811-E
THE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OFSURVEY AND COMMUNITY SHELTER PLANS COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTUpES: AIN MICHIGAN: THEIR IMPACT ON THE DELINEATION AND COMPARATIVEGENERAL PUBLIC. FAMILY ANALYSIS OF POWER STRUCTURES INCOMMUNICATION ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE FIVE IOWA COMMUNITIES.TOPICS: A REPORT OF TWO PILOT AD-670 017STUDIES.
AD-724 lb4 OCD-483)-CA PILOT STUDY OF YOUNG
2 AMERICANS' BELIEFS AND KNOWLEDAFCORRELATES OF YOUNG AMERICANS' ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE.
BELIEFS AND KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CIVIL AD-670 986DEFENSE,
AD-686 3 u3 OCD-RR8SUMMARY OF STUJDIES OF PUBLIC
BG-5 ATTITUDES TOWARD AND INFORMATIONCORRELATES OF YOUNG AMERICANS' ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE.BELIEFS AND KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CIVIL AD-425 618DEFENSE,
AD-686 303 OCD-RR-11-REVCIVIL DEFENSE RESEARCHHFPS-3 ANALYSIS.
THE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTInN AD-663 839SURVEY IN MICHIGAN: ITS IMPACT ON * * *THE GENERAL PUBLIC, OCO-RR-17
AD-718 924 CIVIL DEFENSE AND THE PUBLIC:AN OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC ATTITUDE
*NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES WASHINGTON STUDIES,
C-6
UNCLASSIFIED
--T-7 ____ I, T -'ý------
UNCLASSIFIEDOHI-PLA
AD-726 947 ***
A 6*5* AMERICAN' VIEWS ON CIVILRR8 DEFFNSE IN THE COLD WAR CONTEXT:
SUMMARY OF STUDIES OF PUBLIC 1966.ATTITUDES TOWARD AND INFORMATION AD-649 543ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSEP(OCD-RRd) COST AND FINANCING OF CIVIL
AD-425 618 DEFENSE: SOME PUBLIC VIEWS,AD-651 167
*OHIO STATE UNIV COLUMBUS DISASTER * * *RESEARCH CENTER AMERICANS' PERCEPTIONS OF THE
* * * INTERNATIONAL AND CIVIL DEFENSE
DRC-SER-9 ENVIRONMENTS: 1968.THE WARNING SYSTEM IN DISASTER AD-687 296
SITUITIONS: A SELECTIVE ANALYSIS- * * *AD-714 991 CITIES AND CIVIl. DEFENSE: AN
ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS*PITTSBURGH UNIV PA OF CIVIL DEFENSE DATA.
* * * AD-687 297
THE NEAR SYSTEM: A STUDY IN * * *PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE. CIVIL DEFENSE FAVORABILITY: A
AD-601 011 CRITICAL ANALYSIS.* * * AD-687 381
LEVELS OF ACTIVITY#AD-609 094 THE PERCEPTION OF LOCAL
• * * SURVIVAL CHANCES: AN EXPLORATORYCOLD WAR AND CIVIL DEFENSE EXPLANATION,
ATTITUDLS: THE DESIRABILITY OF AD-710 302ALTERNATE 1MODES OF ORGANIZING A * * *CIVIL DEFENSE EFFORT, THE PUBLIC'S PCRCEPTION OF
AD-609 095 LOCAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE EFFORTS AND• * * FACILITIES,
SOME PUBLIC VIEWS ON CIVIL AD-711 118.DEFENSE PROGRAMS,
AD-609 202 *PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OFSOCIOLOGY
*PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OFSOCIOLOGY PERCEIVED EFFECT;VENESS OF
* * * AMERICA'S DEFENSES,ATTITUDES TOWARD CIVIL DEFENSE: AD-613 666
AN EXAMINATION OF THE ATTRIBUTION * * *OF MAXIMUM APPROVAL, THREAT PERCEPTION AND CIVIL
AD-624 It! DEFENSEP* * * AD-614 386
IMPACT OF THE CUBAN MISSILE *CRISIS. PATTERNS OF PUBLIC THE 1964 CIVIL DEFEU!SERESPONSe. POSTURES: PUBLIC RESPONSE.
AD-635 150 AD-622 099
CIVIL DEFENSE AND SOCIETY. *PLANNING RESEARCH CORP LOS ANGELESAO-643 719 CALIF
0-7UN4CLASSIFIED
Ia
- ±-- -=~- - -
SUNCLASSIFIEDPUB-RES
* * * *RESEARCH ANALYSIS CORP MCLEAN VAPRC-D-796
THE ECONOMIC FEASIUILIlY OF CIVIL AFFAIRS: THE FUTUREDECENTRALIZED METROPOLITAN REGIONS. PROSPECTS OF A MILITARYAD-625 172 RESPONS171LITY
PRO D-1219 D27 4IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ORDERED *RESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C
SPRAWL URBAN CONFIGURArION. *U* ,AD-649 835 0U-1S8-1
A THESAURUS OF CIVIL DEFENqER409 DESCRIPTORS. CIVIL DEFENSECIVIL DEFENSE IMPLICATIONS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS.
CURRENT AND FUTURE URBAN AD-611 438CONFIGURATIONS, * ,
AD-426 925 R OUS1PT. 2ANALYSIS OF SURVEY DATA.
*PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE WASHINGTON D C AD-431 735DIV OF HEALTH MOBILIZATION -U* ,* * *R-OU-158-1
THE ROLE OF THE DENTIST I' CIVIL DEFENSE INFORMATIONNATIONAL DISASTER# SYSTEMS ANALYSIS (A FEASIBILITY
AD-604 274 STUDY OF RESEARCH INFORMATION* * EXCHANGE),
THE ROLE OF THE PHARMACIST IN AD-612 299NATIONAL DISASTERr
AD-604 275 *RESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C* * * OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ECONOMICS
ORIENTATION MANUAL ON DISASTER DIVPREPAREDNESS FOR PHARMACISTS.
AD-620 268 R-OU-157A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF
*RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF SELECTED PARAMETERS BASED ON 8* * *SMSA'S.TIlE RESOLUTION OF THE SOVIET AD-624 702
CONTROVERSY OVER CIVIL DEFENSEAD-287 V•O R-OU-197
** * ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PLANNINGP-2554 FOR POSTATTACK CONDITIONS: SOvF
THE SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE PROBLEIr.S, PROGRAMS, AND PRIORITIES.PROGRAM, AD-632 865
AD-606 690RTI-OU-427-2
P2751 DEFINITION OF LOCAL OPEPATINGCIVIL DEFENSE REVISITED, AREAS.
AD-409 938 AD-704 366
P2752 RTI-R-OU-371-1RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATING SYSTEM
SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMo SYNTHESIS: COUNTERMEASURES MODEL.AD-406 442 AD-681 273
0-8UNCLASSIFIED
V%UNCLASSIFIED
SIM-SYS
*SIMULMATICS CORP CAMBRIDGE MASS A STATISTICAL INFORMATION* * * SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING THE MAGNITUDE
EVALUATION OF COMMUNITY AND SCOPE OF NUCLEAR ATTACKS.RESPONSE TO FPHS PROGRAM. (OCD-4615A)
AD-646 996 AO-668 938
COMMUNITY INTERACTION GAME. NEW RATION CONCEPTS.AD-665 363 AD-684 9Z6
*SIMULMATICS CORP NEW YORK EVALUATION OF CIVIL DEFENSE* * * OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS.
CRISIS LEVEL AND CIVIL DEFENSE. AD-691 134ATTITUDES. ** *
AD-641 989 REOUIREMENTS FOR COVPARATIVEEVALUATION OF COUNTERMEASURES TO,
*STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK POSSIBLE POSTATTACK FISCALCALIF PROBLEmS.
* * * AD-695 ý.41iANALYSIS OF POSTATTACK FOOD * * *
PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION. FAMILY FINANCE AS A CONSTRAI~AD-450 248 ON CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS.S* * *AD-711 056
A SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF CIVIL * *DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AT THE THE USE OF SYSTEMS TECHNIQUESREGIONAL, STATE# AND LOCALOLEVELS. IN CIVIL DEFENSE.INITIAL REPORT: SYSTEM DEFINITION AD-712 314AND PRObLEM IDENTIFICATION#
AD-617 734 *SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CORP SANTA MONICA* * •CALIFCIVIL DEFENSE IN GERMANY, ** *
AD-624 706 SDC-TM-L-4202/O01/O0INTRA EOC SYSTEMS ANALYSIS.
SWISS CIVIL DEFENSE. AD-689 462AD-624 929
* * * TM-3099/000/01OCCUPATIONAL SKILLS AND CIVIL A STATE CIVIL DEFENSE TRAIN;INGA
DEFENSE, PLAN: AN ORGANIZATION AND TRAININGAD-646 IbO DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH STUDY.
* * * AD-644 619METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING TOTAL * *
VULNERABILITY. TM-3679AD-655 530 COMMAND AND CONTROL
* * * IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONCEPT OFEOC DATA DISPLAY SYSTEM, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS UNDER NUCLEAR
AD-659 812 ATTACK.* * * AD-662 603
THE COST AND FEASIBILITY OF * * *
EMERGENCY COOPERATION AMONG LOCAL TM-38O2GOVERNMENTSP A MODEL LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE
AD-662 781 TRAINING PLAN: AN ORGANIZATION AND* * * TRAININJG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
0-9UNCLASSIFIED
S•' t
LII't
UNCLASSIFIEDSYS-WES
STUDY. *WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP WALTHAMAD-665 639 MASS ADVANCED STUDIES GROUP
TM(L)-2600/O00/O1 W-4291DEVLLOPMENT OF OVERALL TRAINING COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEASURE4iENT
PROGRAMS FOR CIVIL DEFENSE, OF CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS.AD-622 817 AD-697 180
TM(L)-2938/O01!O0EMERGENCY OPERATIONS SIMULATION
RESEARCH.AD-637 7b6
TM(L)-2938/O02/O0DATA PROCESSING FOR LOCAL CIVIL
DEFENSE: AN INVESTIGATION OF THEPOTENTIALS.
AD-637 707
*SYSTEM SCIENCES INC BETHESDA MD
A CONCEPT OF EMERGENCY HEALTHSERVICE (EHS) IN NUCLEAR WAR. PARTI - PLANNING FOR EHS IN NUCLEARWAR# AND PART II - DEVELOPING ANEHS ANNEX TO A NUCLEAR EMERGENCYOPERATIONS PLAN (NEOP),
AD-726 9b5
*TECHNICAL OPERATIONS INC ARLINGTONVA WASHINGTON RESEARCH CENTER
TOI-TR-67-4SCENARIO-GAME MODEL FOR THE
EXERCTEE AND EVALUATION Or NATIONALLEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS.
AD-664 '18
*URS RESEARCH CO BURLINGAME CALIF
URS-757-1CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONAL
CONCEPTSPAO-69b 135
*URS RESEARCH CO SAN MATEO CALIF
URS-793EVALUATIO4 OF EMERGENCY
OPERATIONS SIMULATION TRAINING.AD-718 881
0-i0UNCLASSIFIED
AL �
III!I
UNCLASSIFIED
SUBJECT INDEX
*ALTITUDES AD-728 848
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITYCHANES IN BELIEFS ABOUT CIVIL SHELTER PLANNING: DES MOINES AND
DEFENSE TOPICS. POLK COUNTYP IOWA. APPENDICES**AD-600 9b9 AD-728 849
*APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY NUCLEAR WARFARECIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS THE PERCEPTION OF LOCAL SURVIVAL
MASS TRAINING TECHNIQUES IN CHANCES: AN EXPLORATORYCIVIL DLFENSE: TELEPHONIC ADJUNCT EXPLANATION,*TRAINING. AD-710 302
AD-619 6b7SOURCES
*ATTITUDES SOURCE CREDITABILITY CONCERMINGCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS FALLOUT SHELTERS AND RADIATION.
SUMMARY OF STUDIES OF PUBLIC AD-601 014ATTITUDLS TOWARD AND I1NFORMATION"ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE,* ABEHAV!OR
AD-425 618 THREAT EVALUATIONCHANbE IN BELIEFS CONCERNING "AN EXPLORATORY STUDY TO
CIVIL OLFENSE ISSUES. DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICALAD-600 9d5 HAZARD 04 SHELTER MANAGEMENT
SURVEY OF PATTERNS OF INTEREST BEHAVIOR.*IN CIVIL DEFENSE INFORMATION AD-726 456TOPICS.
AP-600 990 *BIBLIOGRAPHIESSUMMARY OF RESEARCH ON CIVIL MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING
DEFENSE B3ELIEF PATTERNS. MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING.*AD-600 991 AD-722 870
CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF PATTERNSABOUT PtACE AND DEFENSE. *BUILDINGS
AD-600 993 FIRESSOURCE CREDITABILITY CONCERNING FUEL VALUES AND BURTING TIMES OF
FALLOUT SHELTERS AND RADIATION. SELECTED FUEL ARRAYS.*AD-601 014 AD-726 001
CRISIS LEVEL AND CIVIL DEFENSEATTITUDLS.* *CHILDREN
AD-641 909 DISASTERSEVALUATION OF COMMUNITY RESPONSE SPECIAL PROBLEmS OF CHILDREN IN
TO FPHS pROGRAM.* CIVIL DEFENSE PLANNING.*AD-64b 996 AD-654 201
CIVIL DEFENSE AND THE PURLIC:AN OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC ATTITUDE *CHINASTUDIES.* CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
AD-726 947 CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE ANDDETERRENCE,*
FALLOUT SHELTERS AD-654 478PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY
SHELTER PLANNING: DES MOINES AND *CIVIL DEFENSEPOLK COUNTY. IOWA. SUMMARY DENTAL PERSONNELREPORT.* THE ROLE OF THE DENTIST IN
D-1UNCLASSIFIED
I
)--~- ---- ~ - --
UNCLASSIFIEDCIV-CIV
NATIONAL DISASTER. AD-609 094AD-604 274 T
MEDICAL PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT OF OVERALL TRAININGTHE ROLE OF THE PHARMACIST IN PROGRAMS FOR CIVIL DEFENSE.
NATIONAL DISASTER. AD-622 817AD-604 275
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS*CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL CIVIL AFFAIRS: THE FUTURE
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS PROSPECTS OF A MILITARYA SU•iMARY OF THE FINAL REPORT RESPONSIBILITY*
LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES: THEIR AD-271 444RELATION TO CIVIL DEFENSE#* STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL ASPECTS
AD-661 048 OF CIVIL DEFENSE WITH SPECIALEMPHASIS ON CRISIS SITUATIONS.
INSTRUCTION MANUALS AD-401 226A STATE CIVIL DEFENSE TRAINING SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLIGICAL-EFCECTS
PLAN: AN ORGANIZATION AND TRAINING OF NUCLEAR ATTACK,DEVELOP.4ENT RESEARCH STUDY.* AD-402 098
AD-644 619 APPENDICES 10 A CORE TRAININGPROGRAM FOR STATE LEVEL CIVIL
LEADERSHIP DEFENSE PROGRAM PERSONNEL*COMMuNITY POWER ACTORS AND CIVIL AD-403 670
DEFENSE. A DELINEATION OF A CORE TRAININJG PROGqAM FORCOMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND AN STATE LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMANALYSIS OF THEIR CIVIL DEFE:1SE PERSONNEL,ATTITUDESt KNOWLEDGE, EEHAVIOR, AND AD-403 759SOURCES OF INFORMATION. SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM;
AD-623 918 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS.COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND CIVIL AD-406 442
DEFENSE, ý DELINEATION OFCOMMUNITY P•WER ACTORS AND AN ANALYSISANALYSIS OF :HEIR CIVIL DEFENJSE DISCUSSION ON CIVIL DEFENSE ANDATTITUDES, KN'.WLEDGEO BEHAVIOR, AND COMMENTS ON ITS PROGRAYS.SOURCES OF !NFLOMATION. AD-409 938
AD-623 4•ATTITUDES
MEDICAL PERSONNEL COMPARISON OF RESPONSES To AORIENTATION MANUAL ON DISASTER QUESTIONNAIRE ON REACTION TO THE
PREPAREDNESS FOR PHARMACISTS, FALLOUT PROTECTION HANDBOOK.AD-620 2b3 AD-600 438
CRISIS LEVEL AND CIVIL DEFE'ISEPSYCHOMETRICS ATTITUDES.*
MULT7D]'LNSIONAL SCALING AD-641 989
ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATIONS FOR EVALUATION OF COMMUNITY PESPONSETHE CIVIL DEFENSE ORGANIZATION. TO FPHS PROGRAM.*
AD-622 714 AD-646 996THE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION
STATISTICAL DATA SURVEY AN!D RESULTING CHANGES ImCIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL: LEVELS SHELTER ADOPTION. SUMMARY REPORT.*
OF ALTIVITY. AD-724 727
D-2UNCLASSIFIED
S_ I
UNCLASSIFIEDCIV-CiV
PUBLIC RESPOSE TO COMHUNITY DOCUMENTATIONSHELlER PLANNING: DES MOINES AND THESAURUS OF CIVIL DEFENSEPOLK COUNTYP IOWA. SUMMARY DESCRIPTORS. CIVIL DEFENSEREPORT.* INFORMATION SYSTEmS ANALYSIS.
AD-728 848 AD-611 438PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY CIVIL DEFENSE INFORMATION
SHELTER PLANNING: DES MOINES AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS (A FEASIBILITYPOLK COUNTY. IOWA. APPENDICES.* STUDY OF RESEARCH INFORMATION
AD-728 849 EXCHANGE)*AD-612 299
BIBLIOGRAPHIESDEFEiqSE READINESS: SELECTED ECONOMICS
REFERENCES.* COST AND FINANCING OF CIVILAD-640 2U6 DEFENSE: SOME PUBLIC VIEWSt*
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: SOCIAL AD-651 167IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING, REOUIREMENTS FOR COMPARATIVEVOLUME I.* EVALUATION OF COUNTERMEASURES TO
AD-705 500 POSSIBLE POSTATTACK FISCALPRpRLE". S,*
CIVIL.DEFENSE PERSONNEL AD-695 641A SUMMARY OF THE FINAL REPORT FAMILY FINANCE AS A CONSTRAINT
LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES: THEIR ON CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS.*RELATION TO CIVIL DEFENSEP, AD-711 056
AD-661 048EFFECTIVENESS
COMMAND + CONTROL SYSTEMS COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR OCO SoFTCOMMAND AND CONTROL IMPLICATIONS TARGET STUDY,
OF TIlL LOI4CElT OF _!.IERGtiNC AD-601 467OPERATIONS UNDER NUCLEAR ATTACK.* REOUIREvENTS FOR LOCAL PLAN'.4TG
AD-662 603 TO COVER HAZARDS OF FALLOUT*AD-611 764L••COST EFFECTIVENESS CHANGING PROSPECTSt.*AISSIONI; AND
COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEASUREMENT ROLES FOR CIVIL DEFENSE: 1965-
OF CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS.* 1975.
AD-697 180 AD-613 637CIVIL DEFENSE AND SCCIETY,*COUN4TERMEASURES AD-643 719
EVALUAlION OF CIVIL DEFENSEOPERATIONAL CONCEPlS-* FALLOUT SHELTERS
AD-691 154 AN EXPLORATORY STUDY TODETERM:IHE THE EFFFCTS OF PHYSICAL
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS HAZARO ON SHELTER rANAIEM.ENTA STATISTICAL ITFORMATION SYSTEM BEHAVIOR.,
FOR ESTIMATING THE MAGNITUDE AND AD-726 41'ý6SCOPE OF NUCLEAR ATTACKS.*
AD-668 938 FOODNEW RATIOt' CONCEPTS.*
DISPLAY SYSTEMS AD-6fý4 936EOC DATA DISPLAY SYSTEM.*
AD-659 812 GAME THEORYCOMMUNITY INTERACTION GAV'E.*
D-3
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDCIV-CIV
AD-665 383 SOCIAL ACTION IN CIVIL DEFENSE.AD-451 079
GEOGRAPHYNATIONAL LOCATION CODE, OCD-Oc.P HOUSING
REGION i: CONNECTICUT, PAAIt;E, DAMAGE TO CONVENTIONAL ANDMASSACHUSETrS, NEW HA%*PSHIRE, NEW SPECIAL TYPES OF RESIDENCES EXPOS.DJERSEYo, l'EW YORK, PUERTO RICO. TO NUCLEAR EFFECTS.
- RHODE ISLAND. VERMONT, vIRGIN AD-611 160ISLANDS.
AD-631 756 LOUISIANANATIONAL LOCATION CuD[, OCr-OEP EZONO'VIC RELATIO:4SHIrS IN THE
REGION 2: DELAWARE# DISTRICT OF NEW ORLEANS METROPOLITAN AREA.*COLU;.,BIA, K•NTUCKY, %lAiYLAND, OHIO, AD-664 753PENNSYLVANIA, VIRGINIA, WESTVIRGINIA. MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING
AD-631 7!>7 MANAGEMENT REOUTREMENTS FORNATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCD-OEP CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS.*
REGICON 2: ALABArlAr CANAL ZO',t AD-642 1i45FLORIDA. GEORGIA, MISSISSIPPI,NORTH CAROLINA, SOUTH CAROLINA, MANAGEMENT PLANNINGTENNESSEE. FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSEAD-631 7-8 ORGANIZATION: THE RATIONALE OF ITS
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCD-OED DEVELOPMENT.REGION 4: ILLINOIS, INDIANA, AD-612 706MICHIGAN, M!NNESOTA, WISCONSINI. SYSTEM ANALYSIS, OF CIVIL DEFENSE
AD-631 7t9 ORGANIZATION AT THE REGIONAL.NATIONAL LOCATION CODE, OCD-OEP STATE, AND LOCAL LEVELS. INITIAL
REGICN :•; -:%:';,SAS, LOJISNA#A, i;at. REPC!RT: 5rfSIL.4 Dii INITION ANDMEXICO. OKLAHOMA# TEXAS. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION.
AD-631 7u0 AD-617 734NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OCO-OEP EMERGENCY OPERATIONS SIMULATION
REGION 6: COLORADO, IOWA. KANSAS. RESEARCH.*MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA. AD-637 766SOUTH DAKOIA, WYOMIING. DATA PROCESSING FOR LOCAL CIVIL
AD-631 761 DEFENSE: AN INVESTIGATION OF THENATIONAL LOCATION CODE, OCD-OEP POTENTIALS.*
REGION 7: ARIZONA, AMERICAN SAMOA, AD-637 767CALIFORN!A. GUAM, HAWAII. NEVADA. THE COST AND FEASIBILITY OFUTAH. EIERGENCY COOPERATION A"ONG LOCAL
AD-631 762 GOVERNM!.ENTS, f*NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. OC,-OEP AD-662 78t
REGION 6: ALASKA. IDAHO. MONTANA, INDICATORS OF SOCIALSOREGON# wASHINGTON. VULNERABILITY: SOCIAL ItNDICATeORS
AD-631 7t3 IN CIVIL DEi'ENSE PLANNI"'G ANDEVALUATION. *
GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT AD-665 881ORGANIZI;NG N.UNICIPAL GOVERtN.ENTS CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONAL
FOR CIViL DEFENSE,* CONCEPTS,*AD-426 430 AD-696 135
DEFINITION OF LOCAL OPERATINGGROUP DYNAMICS AREAS.*
D-4UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDCIV-CIV
AD-704 366 PUBLIC OPINIONA MOLEL OF SOCIETY TO USE IN STUDY DESIGN AID DESCRIPTIONS OF
SYSTEMATIC ANJALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT NINE AMERICAN COMMUNITIES IN WHICHPLANNIN(, FOR SOCIETIES UNDER A SURVEY WAS MADE 04 THESTRESS: FURTHER DEVELOPMENT.* FALLOUTSHELTER ISSUE.
AD-726 961 AD-600 751PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY OF NINE
MANPOWER STUDIES AMEPICAN COMMUNITIES COPCERNIMG THEOCCUPATIONAL SKILLS AND CIVIL FALLOUT-SHELTER ISSUE - METHODSt
DEFENSE,* FINDINGS. AND IMPLICATIONS.AD-646 150 AD-600 752
CIVIL DEFENSE eELIEF PATTERNSMODELS(SIMULATIONS) ABOUT PEACE AND DEFENSE.
SCENARIO-GAME MODEL FOR THE AD-600 993EXERCISL.AN) EVALUATION OF NATIONAL NEARSYSTEM: A STUDY IN PUBLICLEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS.* ACCEPTANCE OF AN EARLY WARNING
AD-664 178 DEVICE FOR CIVILIAN DEFENSE.AD-601 011
OPERATIONAL READINESS COLD WAR AND CIVIL DEFENSE
INTRA EOC SYSTEMS ANALYSIS.* ATTITUDES: THE DESIRABILITY OFAD-689 462 ALTERNATE MODES OF ORGANIZING A
CIVIL DEFENSE EFFORT.OPERATIONS RESEARCH AD-609 095
APPLICATIONS OF NETWORK ANALYSIS SOME PUBLIC VIEWS ON CIVILTO CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONS.* DEFENSE PROGRAMS.
AD-732 948 AD-609 202ARGUMENTATIVE THEMES IN CIVIL
PREPARATION DEFFNSE: (1) A CONTENT ANALYSIS OFTHE USE OF VOLUNTARY THE NEW YORK TIMES.
ORGANIZATIONS IN CIVILIAN DEFENSE AD-613 608AND PREPAREDNESS#* PERCEIVED EFFECTIVENESS OF
AD-439 612 AMERICAIS DEFENSES.AD-613 666
PROPAGANDA CIVIL DEFENSE POSTURES IN 1q64:SOME RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PUBLIC PESPONSE.
SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM. AD-622 099DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FOREIGN ATTITUDES TOWARD CIVIL DEFENSE:AND DOMESTIC SOVIET PROPAGANDA AN EXAMINATION OF THE ATTRIBUTIONON CIVIL DEFENSE. DE3ATE AMONG OF MAXIMUM APPROVAL.SOVIET LEADERS ON THE VALUE OF AD-624 161CIVIL DEFENSE. IMPACT OF THE CUBAN MISSILE
AD-287 ObO CRISIS. PATTERNS OF PUBLICRESPONSE,*
PUBLIC HEALTH AD-635 150A COt4CEPT OF EMERGENCY HEALTH AMERICAN' VIEWS ON CIVIL DEFENSE
SERVICE (EHS; IN NUCLEAR VAR. PART IN THE COLD WAR CONTEXT: 1966.*I - PLANNING FOR EliS IN NUCLEAR AD-649 543WARr ANO PART II - DEVELOPING AN A PILOT STUDY OF YOUNG
EHS ANNEX TO A NUCLEAR EMERGENCY AMERICANS# BELIEFS AND KNOWLEDGEOPERATIONS PLAN (NEOP),* ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE.*
AD-726 955 AD-670 986
D -5UNCLASSIFIED
-)1
UNCLASSIFIEDCIV-CIV
CORRELATES OF YOUNG AMERICANS' SHELTERS
BELIEFS AND KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CIVIL MODEL LARGE INDIVIDUAL SHELTERDEFE S vE, * PLANS.*
AD-6t 3u3 AD-732 514A:.ERICANS' PERCEPTIONS OF THE
INTERNATIONAL AND CIVIL DEFENSE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYENVIPON.ENTS: 1968.* THE EFFECTS OF LOW CPEDIPLE
AD-687 296 SOURCES ON MESSAGE ACCEPTANCE:CITILS AND CIVIL DEFENSt: AN FOUR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN
ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS PERSUASION.*OF CIVIL DEFENSE DATA.* AD-631 613
AD-6B? 297CIVIL DEFENSE FAVORABILITY:. A SOCIOLOGY
CRITICAL ANALYSIS.* COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURE ANDAD-687 3b1 CIVIL DEFENISE.*
THE PUBLIC'S PERCEPTION OF LOCAL AD-451 013CIVILIAN DEFENSE EFFORTS AND KINSHIP AND VOLUNTARYFACILITIES#* ORGANIZATION IN POST-THERMOIUCLEAR
AD-711 118 ATTACK SOCIETY: SOME EXPLOPATnRYTHE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION STUDIES.*
SURVEY AND COMMUNITY SHELTLR PLANS AD-653 466IN MICHIGAN: THEIR IMPACT ON THE A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OFGENERAL PUBLIC. FAMILY COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURES. ACOMMUNICATION ABOUT CIVIL DEFF.jSE DELINEATION AND COMPARATIVETOPICS: A REPORT OF TWO PILOT ANALYSIS OF POWER STRUCTURES IN
STUDIES.* FIVF IOWA COMMUNITIES.*AD-724 lo4 AD-670 016
CIVIL DEFENSE AND THE PUBLIC: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OFAN OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC ATTITUDE COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURES: ASTUDIES.* DELINEATION AND COMAPARATIVE
AD-726 947 ANALYSTS Or POWER STRUCTURES INFIVE IOWA COMMUNITIES.*
RADIOACTIVE F.LLOUT AD-670 017A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF
SELECTED PARAMETERS BASED ON 8 STRUCTURAL PARTSSMSA'S. ANALYSIS OF SURVEY DATA.*
AD-624 702 AD-431 735
RECOVERY SWITZERLAND
ECONu,'IC STRUCTURE OF THE UNITED SWISS CIVIL DEFENSE.STATES USING THE COUNTY AS A AD-624 929FUNCTIONAL BASE.*
AD-692 876 SYSTEMS ENGINEERINGCIVIL DEFENSE OPERATING SYS'F"
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH SYNTHESIS: COUNTER,.'EASIJRES ?¶O"FL.*METHODOLOGY FOR POSTATTACK AD-681 273
RESEARCH.* THE USE OF SYSTEMS TECHNIQUES IN
AD-639 7b1 CIVIL DEFENSE.*CIVIL DEFENSE RESEARCH AD-712 !14
ANALYSIS.*AD-663 8.39 TESTS
D-6UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDCIV-COL
TESTING CIVIL DEFENSF PLANS AND THE ROOTS OF PUBLIC LAW 920.*OPERATIONS AT THE FEDERAL# STATE AD-637 900AND LOCAL LEVELS. RADIATIONANALYSIS. MUSTERING. DAMAGE URBAN AREASASSESSMLNT TESTS. ATTACK AwD CIVIL DEFENSE IMPLICATIONS (•SHELTER STAY PERIODS. POST SHELTER CURRENT AND FUTURE URBANPERIODS. CONFIGURATIONS.
AD-408 967 AD-426 925INTERGOVERNMENTAL CIVIL rEFENSE
THREAT EVALUATION ORGANIZATIONS AND PROGRAMS.THREAT PERCEPTION AND CIVIL AD-615 725
DEFENSE. LOW-BUDGET CIVIL DEFENSEAD-614 386 SYSTEMS.
AD-622 096TRAINING ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF
REQUIREMENTS AND METHODS FOR LIECENTRALIZED METROPOLITAN REGIONS.IMPROVING OCAL CIV:L DEFENSE AD-625 172TRAINING. IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ORDEREM
AD-410 515 SPRAWL URBAN CONFIGURATION.*CIVIL DEFENSE COURSE DEVELOPMENT AD-649 835
TECHNIQUES: INSTRUCTORS GUIDE FORA COURSE IN STATE LEVEL CIVIL USSRDEFENSE STAFF OPERATION•S. SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM.
AD-601 930 AD-606 690CIVIL DEFENSE COURSE DEVELOPMENT CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE AND
TECHNIQUES: A COURSE IN STATE DETERRENCE,*LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE STAFF AD-654 478OPEI,/Tl;i;S. ACTICtIS OF THE POPULATION IN A
AD-601 931 RURAL AREA WHEN THE CIVIL DEFENSEMASS TRAINING TECHNIQUES IN SIGNALS ARE GIVEN--TRANSLATION.
CIVIL DEFENSE: TELEPHONIC ADJUNCT AD-669 989TRAINING.
AD-619 657 WEST GERMANYTRAI,q1NG REQUIREMENTS FOR CIVIL DEFENSE IN GERMANY.
POSTATTACK AuAPTIVE BEHAVIOR. AD-624 706AD-624 870
A STATE CIVIL DEFENSE TRAINIING *CIVIL F,'ASONNELPLAN: AN ORGANIZATION AND TRAINING DECIS!O MAKINGDEVELOPMENT RESEARCH STUDY.* COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURE AND
AD-644 619 CIVIL DEFENSE.*A MODEL LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE ID-451 013
TRAINING PLAN: AN ORGANIZATION AN-JIRAINING DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH *CIVILIAN PERSONNELSTUDY.* POLITICAL SCIENCE
AD-665 639 A SUPmARY OP TPE FIMAL REPORTEVALUATION OF EMERGENCY LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES: THEIR
OPERATIONS SIMULATION TRAINING.* RELATION To CIVIL DEFENSE#*AD-718 881 AD-661 048
UNITED STATES *COLD WARU. S. CIVIL DEFENSE BEFORE 1950: ATTITUDES
D-7UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDCOM-EAS
COLD WAR AND CIVIL DEFENSE *DENTAL PERSONNELATTITUDLS: THE DESIRABILITY OF CIVIL DEFENSEALTERNArE MO)LS OF ORGANIZING A THE ROLE OF THE DENTIS INCIVIL DEFENSE EFFORT. NATIONAL DISASTER.
AD-609 095 AD-604 274
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS *DENTISTRYAMERICAN' VIEWS ON CIVIL DEFENSE CIVIL DEFENSE
IN THE COLD WAR CONTEXT: 1966.* THE ROLE OF THE DENTIST INAD-649 543 NATIONAL DISASTER.
AD-604 274PUBLIC OPINION
IMPACT OF THE CUBAN MISSILE 'DISASTERSCRISIS. PATTERNS OF PUBLIC ATTITUDESRESPONSE.* THE HOME FALLOUT PROTECTION
AD-635 lbO SURVEY IN MICHIGAN: ITS IMPACT ONTHE GENERAL PUBLIC,*
*COMBUSTION AD-718 924TEXTILES
FUEL VALUES AND BURNING TIMES OF CHILDRENSELECTED FUEL ARRAYS.* SPECIAL PROBLEMS OF CHILDREN IN
AD-726 001 CIVIL DTFE14SE PLANNING.*AD-654 201
*COMPUTERSPROGRAMMING (COMPUTERS) MEDICAL PERSONNEL
ANALYSIS OF SURVEY DATA.* ORIENTATION MAUUAL ON DISASTERAD-431 735 PREPAREDNESS FOR PHARMACISTS.
AD-620 268*COUNTERMEASURES
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS WARNING SYSTEMSEVALUAIION OF CIVIL DEFENSE. THE WARNING SYSTEM I1 DISASTER
OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS.* SITUATIOmS: A SELECTIVE ANALY<IS.*AD-691 134 AD-714 991
*DAMAGE ASSESSMENT *UbSPLAY SYSTEMSNUCLEAR WARFARE CIVIL IEFENSE SYSTEMS
A STATISTICAL INFORMATIOrJ SYSTEM EOC DATA DISPLAY SYSTEM.*FOR ESTIMATING ThE MAGNITUDE AND AD-659 812SCOPE OF NUCLEAR ATTACKS.*
AD-668 938 *EARL' WARNING SYSTEMSCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
*DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS NEARSYSTEM: A STUDY IN PUBLICCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS AC':EPTANCE OF AN EARLY WARNING
DATA PROCESSING FOR LOCAL CIVIL DEVICE FOR CIVILIAN DEFENSE.DEFENSE� AN INVESTIGATION OF THE AD-;)O1 011POTENTiALS. *
AD-637 7b7 *EASTERN EUROPEA STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
FOR ESTIMATING THE MAGNITUDE AND CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE ANDSCOPE OF NUCLEAR AT1ACKS,* DETERRENCE,*
AD-668 968 AD-654 478
D-8UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDS~ECO-HOU
*'ECONOMICS PUBLIC OPINIONUNITED STATES DEVELOPMENT OF VALUES AND
ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE UNITED BELIEFS IN YOUNG APERICANS TOWA~nSTATES USING THE COUNTY AS A FALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE.
F FUNCTIOrjAL BASE.* AD-637 167AD-692 876 DEVELOPMENT OF VALUES AND
BELIEFS IN YOUNG AMERICANS TOWARDURBAN AREAS FALLOUT SHEL T ERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE.
ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE AD-637 168NEW ORLEANS METROPOLITAN AkEA.*
AD-664 753 *FIRESNUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE
*EMPLOYMENT FIRE BEHAVIOR# IGNITION TOINDUSTRIES FLASHOVER.
OCCUPATIONAL SKILLS A14D CIVIL AD-618 414DEFENSE,*
AD-646 150 *FOODCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
*FALLOUT SHELTERS NEW RATION CONCEPTS.*ATTITUDES AD-684 936
PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITYSHELTER PLANNING: DES MOINES AND *FOOD DISPENSINGPOLK COUNTY' IOWA. SUMMARY NUCLEAR WARFAREREPORT.* ANALYSIS OF POSTATTACK FOOD
AD-728 848 PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION.*PUBLIC RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY AD-450 228
SHELTER PLANNING: DES MOINES ANDPOLK COuNTY, IOWA. APPENDICES.*
AD-728 849
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSA SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF
SELECTED PARAMETERS BASED ON 8SMSA'S.
AD-62 4 702 *GROUP DYNAMICSTHE RiOME FALLOUT PROTECTIONj CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
SURVEY AND COMMUNITY SHELTER PLANS THE USE OF VOLUNTARYIN MICHIGAN: THEIR IMPACT ON THE ORGANIZATIONS IN CIVILIAN DEFENSEGENERAL PUBLIC. FAMILY AND PREPAREDNESS,*COMMUNICATION ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE AD-439 612TOPICS: A REPORT OF TAO PILOT ACTIONS OF THE POPULATION I"! ASTUDIES,* RURAL AREA WHEN THE CIVIL DEFEN!SE
AD-724 164 SIGNALS ARE GIVEN--TRANSLATION.AD-669 989
MANAGEMENT ENGINEERINGAN EXPLORATORY STUDY TO INTERACTIONS
DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL COMMUNITY INTERACTION GAME.*HAZARD ON SHELTER MANAGEMENT AD-665 383BEHAVIOR.*
AD-726 456 *HOUSINGNUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE
0-9UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDINF-NAT
DAMAoE TO CONVENTIONAL AND AD-662 781SPECIAL TYPL5 OF RLSIDLNCFS 2xi;'OSED CIVIL DI:FENSE OPERATIONALTO NUCLLAR EFFECIS. CONCEPTS,*
AD-611 uO AD-6'Th 135DEFINITION OF LOCAL OPERATIrIG
*INFORMATION REIRIEVAL AREAS.*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS AD-704 366
THESAURUS OF CIVIL DEFENSE CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: SOCIALDESCRIPICRS. CIVIL DEFENSE IMPACT AnO MANAGEW:NT PLANNING.INFORMAIIO1 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS. VOLUME I.*
AD-611 4DE AD-S05 500CIVIL DEFENSE It;FORMATION A MODCL OF SOCIETY TO USE INT
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS (A FEASIO1LITY SYSTEPATIC ANALYSIS AU]D MANAGE"FNTSTUDY OF RESEARCH INFORMATION PLANNING FOR SOCIETIES UNDEPEXCHANGE)- STRESS: FURTHER DEVELOPMENT,*AD-612 299 AD-726 961
*INSTRUCTORS PUBLIC HEALTHCIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL ENVIRONVENTAL HEALTH PLAr'NNG
STAI4UARDIZED TESTING FOR THE FOR POSTATTACK COtNOITIONS: SOMEOFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE PROSLEMS, PROGRAMSt ANDRADIOLOGICAL MONITORING FOR PRIORITIES.*INSTRUCTORS COURSE. AD-632 865
AD-601 214SOCIOMETRICS
*MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING INDICATORS OF SOCIALBIBLIOGRAPHIES VULNERABILITY: SOCIAL INDICATORS
MANAtENIENT ENGINEERING.* IN CIVIL DEFENSE PLANiINIG ANDAD-722 870 EVALUATION.*
AD-685 881CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS AMANAbEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOP *MEDICAL PERSONNEL
CRISIS CIV:L DEFENSE PROGRAMS,* CIVIL DEFENSEAD-642 14' THE POLE OF THE PHARvACIST IN
NATIONAL DISASTER.FALLOUT SHELTERS AD-604 275
AN EXPLORATORY STUDY TODETERMItqE THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL DISASTERSHAZARD ON SHELTER MANAGEMENT ORIENTATION MANUAL ON DISASTERBEHAVIOR.* PREPAREDN.JESS FOR PHARMACISTS.
AD-726 4b6 AD-620 268
*MANAGEMENT PLANNING *MILITARY GOVERNMENTBIBLIOGRAPHIES CIVIL AFFAIRS: THE FUTURE
MANAoEMENT ENGINEERING.* PROSPECTS OF A MILITARYAD-722 870 RESPONSIrILITY*
AD-271 444CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
THE COST AND FEASIBILITY OF *NATIONAL DEFENSEEMERGENCY COOPERATION AMONG LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSGOVERNMENTSt* SCENARIO-GAME MODEL FOR THE
D-10
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDNEW-OPE
EXERCISE AN1D EVALUATION OF NATIONAL CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONALLEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS.* CONCEPTS,*
AD-664 178 AD-6q6 135
*NEWSPAPERS RECOVERYCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS A MODEL OF SOCIETY TO USE Im
ARGUMENTATIVE THEMES IN CIVIL SYSTLMATIC ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENTDEFENSE: (1) A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF PLANNING FOR SOCIETIES UNDERTHE NEw YORK TIMES. STRESS: FURTHER DEVELOPMENT.*
AD-613 608 AD-726 961
*NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE SURVIVALCOUNTERMEASURES THE PERCEPTION OF LOCAL SURVIVAL
REOUIREMNENTS FOR CON.PARATIVE CHANCES: AN EXPLORATORYEVALUATION OF COUNTERI•EASURES TO EXPLANATION@*POSSIBLE POSTATTACK FISCAL AD-710 302PROBLEMS.*
AD-6)5 641 THERM3NUCLEAR REACTIONSMETHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING TOTAL
FIRES VULNERABILITY,*FIRE BEHAVIOR# IGNITION TO AD-655 530
FLASHOVER.AD-618 414 URBAN ARFAS
FUEL VALUES AND BURNiNG TIMES OFHOUSING SELECTED FUEL ARRAYS-*
DAMAGE TO CONViITIOi\AL AND AU-i26 001SPECIAL TYPES OF RESIDENCES E::POSEDTO NUCLEAR EFFECTS. *NUCLEAR ,,ARFARE CASI,!L T S
AD-6bI iu CIVILIAN PERSONNELCOLLATERAL OAVAGE TO POPULATION
*NUCLEAR WARFARE FROM WEAPO'IS AIMED AT STRATECICCOMPARISON OF RESPONSES l0 MILITA7Y BASES.
QUESTIONNAIRE ON REACTION TO THE AD-6f'. 849FALLOUT PROTECTION HANOBOOK.
AD-600 468 PUBLIC HEALTHA CONCEPT OF EMERGENCY HEALTH
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS SERVICE (EHS) IN NUCLEAR WAR. PAPTEVALUATION OF CIVIL DEFENSE I - PLANNING FOR EHS IN NUCLEAQ
OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS.* WAR# AND PART II - DEVELOPING ANAD-691 134 EHS ANNEX TO A NUCLEAR EfIERGENCY
OPERATIOjS PLAN (NEOP).*DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AD-726 955
A STATISTICAL INFORMATIGN SYSTEMFOR ESTIMATING THE MAGNITUDE AND RADIATION INJURIESSCOPE OF NUCLEAR ATTACKG.* REVIEW OF COINBINED TflAUMA:
AD-668 938 RESEARCH, CLINICAL MANAGEMENT ANDAPPLICATIONS OF NETWORK ANALYSIS PLANNING.
TO CIVIL DEFEt!SE OPERATIONS.* AD-632 595AD-732 948
*OPERATIONS RCýSEARCHPASSIVE DEFENSE CIVIL AFFAIRS: THE FUTURE
D-11UNCLASSIFIED
!!~
UNCLASSIFIEDORG-PUB
PROSPECTS OF A MILITARY NUCLEAR WARFARERESPONSIBILITY* ENVIRON"ENTAL HEALTH PLAI'NIý,G
AD-271 444 FOR POSTATTACK CofjnITIOt,S: SO*AEPRORLES, PROGRA.MS, AND
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS PRIORITIES.*A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF AD-632 865
SELECTED PARAMETERS BASED ON 8SMSA'S. NUCLEAR WARFARE CASUALTIES
AD-624 702 A CONCEPT OF EVERGENICY HFALTHAPPLICATIONS OF NETIORK ANALYSIS SERVICE (EHS) IN N)UCLEA) 1,AR. PART
TO CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATIONS.* I - PLANNIrjG FOR EHS IN NUCLEAQAD-732 948 WAR, AND PART II - OEVELOPIt:G AN
EHS ANtEx TO A NUCLEAR liERGENCY*ORGANIZATIONS OPERATIO'jS PLAN (NEOP).*
SOCIAL SCIENCES AD-726 955SYSTEM LINKAGES AMONG WOMEN'S
ORGANIZATIONS: AN EXPLORATORY *PUBLIC OPINIONSTUDY OF MEMBERSHIP AND LEADERSHIP CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEM'SLINKAGES AMONG WOMEN'S FORMAL SUMMARY OF STU'rIES OF PUeLICORGANIZATIONS IN A LOCAL ATTITUDES TOWARD AND iNFORMATIONCOMMUNITY.* ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE,*
AD-651 049 AD-425 61eNEARSYSTEM: A STUDY IN PUBLIC
*PERFORMANCE TESTS ACCEPTANCE OF AN EARLY 'JARNI;JGCIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL DEVICE FOR CIVILIAN DEFENSE.
STANDARDIZED TESTING FOR THE AD-601 011OFFICE OF CIVIL - SOtAE PUPLIC VIEWS ON CIVILRADIOLOCiCAL :;o:,I • FOR DEFENSE PROGRAMS.INSTRUCTORS COURSE. AD-609 202
AD-601 214 THREAT PERCEPTION AND CIVILDEFENSE.
*PHARMACOLOGY AD-614 386CIVIL DEFENSE ATTITUDES TOW;ARD CIVIL DEFENSE:
THE ROLE OF THE PHARMACIST IN AN EXAMINATION (F THE ATTRICUTTONNATIONAL DISASTER. OF MAXIMU'Mi APPROVAL.
AD-604 275 AD-624 161A PILOT STUDY OF YOUNG
*POPULATION A'IERICANS' BELIEFS AND KNOWLEDSENUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE AOOUT CIVIL DEFENSF..*
COLLATERAL DA%*IAGE TO POPULATION AD-670 986FROM WVEAPONS AIMED AT STRATEGIC CORRELATES OF YOUNG AMERICANJS,MILITARI BASES. BELIEFS AND KNOWLEDGE AROUT CIVIL
AD-602 849 DEFENSE.AD-686 303
*PUBLIC HEALTH CITIES AND CIVIL DEFENSE: ANMANAGEMENT PLANNING ECOLOGICAL AFPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS
ENVI;<OHIM.ENIAL HEALTH PLANNING OF CIVIL DEFENSE DATA.*FOR POSTATTACK CONDITIONS: SOE AD-687 2 q 7PROBLEMS, PROGRAMSP AND CIVIL DEFENSE FAVORABILITY: APRIORITIES,$ CRITICAL ANALYSIS.*
AD-632 865 AD-687 381
D-12UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDRAD-SHE
THE PUBLIC'S PERCEPTION OF LOCAL RADIATION MONITORSCIVILIAN DEFENSE EFFORTS AnD TESTIrOG CIVIL rFFENSF PLANS ANOFACILITIES,* OPERATIO;4S AT THE FEDERAL# STATE
AD-711 118 AND LOCAL LEVELS. RADIATIONCIVIL DEFENSE AND THE PUBLIC: ANALYSIS. MUSTERIN3. DAMAGE
AN OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC ATTITUDE ASSESS:AEnT TESTS. ATTACK ANDSTUDIES.* SHELTER STAY PERIODS. POST SHELTER
AD-726 947 PERIODS.I. ; AD-408 967
FALLOUT SHELOERSDEVELOPMENT OF VALUES AND *REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY)
BELIEFS IN YOUNG AMERICANS TOWARD NUCLEAR WARFAREFALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. A STUDY OF CONSENSUS ON
AD-637 1b7 PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATED TODEVELOPMENT OF VALUES ANID RECOVERY FROM NUCLEAR ATTACK.*
BELIEFS IN YOUI:G AMERICANS TOWARD AD-730 360FALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE,
AD-637 168 *SHELTERSATTITUDES
SHELTERS CHANGES IN BELIEFS ABOUT CIVILSTUDY DESIGN AND DESCRIPTIONS OF DEFENSE TOPICS.
NINE AMERICAN COMMUNITIES IN WHICH AD-600 989A SURVEY WAS MADE ON THE SUMMARY OF RESEARCH ON CIVILFALLOUTSHELTER ISSUE. DE.-'ENSE BELIEF PATTERNS.
AD-6O0 751 AD-600 .991PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY OF NINE SOURCE CREDITABILITY CONCER1ITNG
AMERICAN COMMUNITIES CONCERNING THE FALLOUT SHELTERS AND RADIATION.FALLOUT-SHELTER ISSUE - -,rTlO'SSs AD-601 014FINDINGS* AND IMPLICATIONS.
AD-600 752 CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSPODEL LARGE INDIVIDUAL SHELTER
*RADIATION INJURIES PLANS.*NUCLEAR WARFARE CASUALTIES AD-732 514
REVIEW OF COMBINED TRAUM.A:RESEARCH, CLINICAL MANAGEMENiT AND COSTSPLANNING. COLLATERAL DAMAGE To POPULATrION
AD-632 595 FROM WEAPCN5 AIMED AT STRATEGICMILITARY BASES.
*RADIATION MONITORS AD-602 849AUTOMATIC
INSTALLATION AND TESTIt'G OF AN MANAGEMENT PLANNINGAUTOMATIC REMOTE RADIOLOGICAL REOUIREmENTS FOi LýJCAL PLAN"JING,MONITORING SYSTEM.* TO COVER HAZARDS OF FALLOUT.
AD-647 350 AD-611 764"
*RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT PUBLIC OPINIONATTITUDES STUDY DESIGN AHD DESCRIPTIO,!S OF
SOURCE CREDITABILITY CONCEPNING NINE AVERICAN CO;!UvjITlES IN W'V'HICHFALLOUT SHELTERS AND RADIATION. A SURVEY WAS MADE ON THE
SAD-601 014 FALLOUTSHELTER ISSUE.AD-600 751
D-134 UNCLASSIFIED
SOC-TESUNCLASSIFIED
PUB3LIC OPINION SURVEY OF NINJE DEFFNSE. A DELINrATION OFAMERICA:4 CO.:-MUNITIES COrJCEI<NINC THE C01VMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND AN'FAL.LOUT-SHELTER ISSUE - METHOf)Sf ANALYSIS OF THEIR CIVIL DEFENS-FINI.DINtGc~, AN4D IMPLICATIONS. ATTITUDFSP KNOWLEDGEP PEHAVIOR, ANOAD-60O 75~2 SOURCES OF INFORMATION.
CHANUE IN GILIEcS CONCERNINJG AD-623 943CIVIL DLrLNSE ISSUES. CIVIL DEFENSE ANt) SOCIETY.*
AD-600 9 o5 AD-643 719THE hOV-E FALLOUT PROTECTIONI A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF
SURVEY IN MAICHIGAN: ITS IMPACT ON COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTUPES. ATHE GENERAL PUISLIC#* DELINEATION AND COM'PARATIVE
AD-718 9z4 ANALYSIS OF POe-ER STRUCTURES I~jFIVE IOWA COMMUNITIES-*
*SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AD-670 016CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS A COolPARATIVE INALYSIS OF
THE EFFECTS OF LO4 CREDIRLE COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTIPES: ASOURCES ON '-zSSPGE ACCEPTArJcE:- DELINEATION~ AND C0.'PARATIVEFOUR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN ANALYSIS OF POWER STRUCURES I~jrERSUASION.* FIVE: IOWA COMMUNITIES.*
AD-631 613 AD-670 017
*SOCIAL SCIENCES UNITED STATESORGANIZATIONS KINSHIP AND VOLUNTARY
SYSTEM LINKAGES AMONG W'.OMENVS ORGANIZATION IN POrT-TI-!7PVOf:'UCLE7ARORGANIZATIONS: AN EXPLO'ýATORV ATTACK SOCIETY: SOM'-E EXPLORATORYSTUDY OF MEF>I5ERSHIP Ani. LEADEF-DHIP STUDIESP*LINKAG;:S AMONG IWOIEN'S FOP:AIAL AD-653 466ORGANIZATIONS IN A LOCALCO:4M4UNITY.* *SUBJECT INDEXING
AD-651 049 CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSTHESAURUS OF CIVIL nPFENSE
*SOC IOLOGY DESCRIPTORS. CIVIL DEFC'NSECIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL !NFORNMATION SYSTEvS ANALYSIS-
CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL: LEVELS AD-611 433OF ACTIVITY.
AD-609 094 *SYSTEMS ENGINEERINGCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS THE USE OF SYSTFMS TECHNIQUrS INCOLD wy4R AND CIVIL L)CFENSE CIVIL DEFENJSE.*
ATTITUDES: THE DESIRAuILITY OF AD-712 314ALTERNATE --ODES OF ORGANIZING3 ACIVIL D0.FENSC EFFORT. VULNERABILITY
AD-609 095 METHC:ýOLOGY FOR ASSESSINA TOTALCOMI-MUNITY POW'IER ACTO;RS AND) CIVIL VULNER A ILITYt*
DEFENSE. A DEELINEATION OF AD-655 530C ýM'MUIJITY PC.'ER ACTORS AND ANANýLYSIS OF THEIR CIVIL DEFENJSE *TEST CONSTRUCTION (PSYCHOLOGY)AT1TTUDESt KifJO.'LEDfGEP 6EHAVIOR, AD lNSTRUCTORSSOURCES Of- iN4FOR-iMATION. STAIIDARPIZED Tr!5TING FOR THE,
AD-623 9!8 OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSECOMM-'uNITY POWER ACTORS AND CIVIL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING FOR
D- 14UNCLASSIFIED
A *M,
UNCLASSIFIEDTEX-WES
INSIRUCTOHS COURSE. SPRAWL UPBAN CONFIGURATION.*AD-601 214 AD-649 835
*TEXTTLES *URBAN PLANNING
COMBUSTION ECONOMICSFUEL VALUES AND BURNING TI°ES OF ECONOMOiIC FEASI9TLITY OF
SELECTED FUEL ARRAYS.* DECENTRALIZED METROPOLITAN REGIONS.AD-726 001 AD-625 172
*THERMONUCLEAR REACTIONS *USSRNUCLEAR WARFARE CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING TOTAL SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM.
VULNERAbILITY#* AD-606 690AD-65b 530 CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE AND
DETERRENCE,**THREAT EVALUATION AD-654 478
PUBLIC OPINIONTHREAT PERCEPTION AND CIVIL *VULNERABILITY
DEFENSE. SYSTEMS ENGINEERINGAD-614 386 METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING TOTAL
VULNERA',ILITY,**TRAINING AD-655 530
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSREQUIREMENTS AND METHODS FOR *WARNING SYSTEMS
IMPROVING ,L CIVIL DEFENSE DISASTERSTRAINING. THE WARNING SYSTEM IN DISASTER
AD-410 515 SITUATIONS: A SELECTIVE ANALYSIS.*AD-714 9--
*UNITEC STATESCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS *WEST GERMANY
U. S. CIVIL OLFLNSE BEFORE 1950: CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSTHE ROOTS OF PUBLIC LAW 92" * CIVIL DEFENSE IN GERMANY.
AD-637 900 AD-624 706
ECONOMILSECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE UNITED
STATES USING (HE COUNTY AS AFUN4CTIO;iAL BASE.*
AD-692 876
*URBAN AREASCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
ORGANIZING MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTSFOR CIVIL DEFENSEP*
AD-426 430INIERGOVERNMENTAL "IVIL DEFENSE
ORGANIZATIONS AND PROGRAMS.AD-615 725 t
CONFIGURATIONIMPLEMENTATION OF AN ORDEREO
D-15UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
TITLE INDEX
1HE 1964 CIVIL DEFENSE AD-622 099 ARGUMENTATIVE THEMES IN AD-613 608POSTUREs: PUBLIC RESPONSE,(U) CIVIL DEFENSE: (1) A CONTENT
*CIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF THE NEW YORK TIVES.(U)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
ACTIONS OF THE AD-669 989POPULATION IN A RURAL AREA WHEN THE ATTITUDES TOWARD ZIVIL AO-624 161CIVIL DEFENSE SIGNALS ARE GIVEN,(U) DEFENSE: AN CXAMINATION OF THE
*CIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS ATTRIBUTION OF MAXIMUM APPROVAL,(U!*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND AD-600 752THE FALLOUT-SHELTER ISSUE (A NIN-F.-COMMUNITY SURVEY). VOL. I, ASUMMARY OF METHOnS, FINIINGS, ANDIMPLICATIONS,(U)
*PUBLIC OPANIONCHANGING PROSPECTS# AD-613 637
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND AD-600 751 MISSIONS AND ROLES FOR CIVILTHE FALLOUT-SHELTER ISSUE (A NINE- DEFENSE: 1965-1975t(U)COMMUNITY SURVEY). VOL. IIe THE *CIVIL DEFEuSE SYSTEm¶S
STUDY DLSIGN AND THE STUDYCOMMUNITIES,(U) CITIES AND CIVIL AD-687 297
*PUBLIC OPINION DEFENSE: AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TOIHE ANALYSIS OF CIVIL DEFENSE
AMERICAN' VIEWS ON AD-649 543 DATA9(U)CIVIL DEFENSE IN THE COLD WAR *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSCONTEXT: 19b6.(U)
*COLD WAR CIVIL AFFAIRS: THE AD-271 44LFUTURE PROSPECTS OF A MILITARY
AMERICANS' PERCEPTIONS AD-687 296 RESPONSIRILITY(U)OF THE INTERNATIONAL AND CIVIL *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSDEFENSE ENVIRONMENTS: 1968.(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS CIVIL DEFENSE AND AD-643 719SOCIETY. U)
ANALYSIS OF POSTATTACK AD-450 228 *CIVIL LEFEN:" SYSTEMSPCOD PROCESSING AND"1ISTRIBUTION.(U) CIVIL DEFENSE AND THE AD- 7 26 947
*FýQ0 DISPENSIVG PUBLIC: AN OVERVIEd OP PUBLICATTITUDE STUDIES.(U)
ANALYSIS OF SURVEY AD-431 735 *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSDATA. (U)
*COMPUTERS CIVII. DEFENSE BELIEF AD-600 993PATTERNS: (I) PEACE AND
APPLICATIONS OF NETWORK AD-732 948 DEFENSE. (U)ANALYSIS TO CIVIL DEFENSE *ATTITUDESOPERATIONS. (U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS CIVIL DEFENSE BULIEF AD-601 014PATTERNS: (II) SOURCE
AN APPROACH TO THE ,D-402 098 CREDIBILITY.(U)STUDY OF SOCIAL AND t ,CHOLOGICAL *ATTITUDESEFFECTS OF NUCLEAR ATTACK(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF AD-6O0 990
T-IUNCLASSIFIED
= .
UNCLASSIFIEDCIVy-COM
PATTERNS: (IV) TOPIC APPEALS.(U) SYSTEM SYNTHESIS: COUNTERMEASURES
*ATTITUDES MODEL. (U)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEP AD-600 985FATTERaNS: (V) CHANGE IN BELIEFSP CIVIL DEFENSE AD-O: 135PART A,(U) OPERATIONAL CONCFPTSt(U)
*ATT'ITUDES *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF AD-600 989 CIVIL DEFENSE RESEARCH AD-663 839PATTERNS: (VI) CHANGE IN BELIEFS# ANALYSIS,(U)CIVL DLTNE AUDES93FART B.(U) *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
*ATTDSCIVIL DEFENSE AD-409 938
CIVIL DEFENSE BELIEF AD-600 991 REVISITEDt(U)PATTERN5: (VII) SUMMARY.,u) *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
*ATTITUDESCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: AD-705 500
CiVIL DEFENSE COURSE AD-6nl 931 SOCIAL IMPACT PND MANAGEMENTDEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES. A COUPSE IN PLANNING, VOLUME I.(U)S*ATE LLVEL CIVIL DEFENSE STAFF *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSO ERATILNS 1 (U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS COLD WAR AND CIVIL AD-6J9 095DEFENSE ATTITUDES: THE DESIRABILITY
CIVIL DEFENSE COURSE AD-601 930 OF ALTERNATE MODES OF ORGANIZING ADEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES. CIVIL DEFENSE EFFORTt(U)INSTRUCTOR'S GUIDE FOR A COURSE IN *COLD WARSTATE LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE STAFFUI'ERATIG;•, •) LOLLATERAL DAMAGEW(U) AD-602 849
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS *NUCLEAR WARFARE CASUALTIES
CIVIL DEFENSE AD-687 a81 .COMMAND AND CONTROL AD-662 603FAVORABILITY: A CRITICAL IMPLICAlIONS OF THE COUCEPT OF
,ANALYSIS.(U) EMERGENCY OPERAT INS UNDER NUCLEAR*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS ATTACK.(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSCIVIL DEFENSE AD-426 925
IMPLICATIONS OF CURRENT AND FUTURE COMMUNITY INTERACTION AD-665 383URBAN CONFIGURATIONSP(U) GAME.(Ul
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEmS
CIVIL DEFENSE IN AD-624.706 COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AD-623 918GERMANYP(U) AND CIVIL DEFENSE. A DELINEATION OF
*WEST GERMANY COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND ANANALYSIS OF THEIR CIVIL DEFENSE
CIVIL DEFENSE 4D-61k 299 ATTITUDES, KNOWLEDGE. BEHAVIOR, ANDINFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS (A SOURCES OF INFOR1MATION,(U)FEASIBILITY STUDY OF RESEARC4 *CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNELINFORMATION EXCHANGE).(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AD-623 943AND CIVIL DEFENSE. A DELINEA!ION OF
CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATING AD-681 273 COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS AND AN
T-2UNCLASSIFIED
a
UNCLASSIFIEDCOM-THE
ANALYSIS OF THEIR CIVIL DEFENSE *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSATTITUDOLSp KNOWLEDGEt tEHAVIORt ANDSOURCES OF INFORMATION,(U) COST AND FINANCING OF AD-651 167
*CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL CIVIL DEFENSE: SOME PUBLICVIEWSP(U)
COMMUNITY POWER AD-451 013 *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSSTRUCTURE AND CIVIL DEFENSE,(U)
'CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS COST-EFFECTIVENESS AD-697 180MEASUREMENT OF CIVIL DEFENSE
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AD-670 016 SYSTEMS.(U)OF COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURES. A *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSDELINEATION AND COMPARATIVEANALYSIS OF POWER STRUCTURES IN CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE AD-654 478FIVE IOWA COMMUNITIES.(U) AND DETERRENCEP(U)
*SOCIOLOGY *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTE4SA COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AD-670 017 CRISIS LEVEL AND CIVIL AD-641 989
OF COMMUNITY POWER STRUCTURES: A DEFENSE ATTITUDES.(U)DELINEATION AND COMPARATIVE *ATTITUDESANALYSIS OF POWER STRUCTURES IN
FIVE IO*A COMMUNITIES.(U) DAMAGE TO CONVENTIONAL AD-611 160*SOCIOLOGY AND SPECIAL TYPES OF RESIDENCES
EXPOSED TO NUCLEAR EFFECTS.(U)A CONCEPT OF EMERGENCY AD-726 955 *HOUSINGHEALTH SERVICE (EHS) IN NUCLEARWAR. PART I - PLANNING FOR EHS IN DAT; PROCESSING FOR AD-637 767NUCLEAR WAR, AND PART II - LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE: ANUEVELOPING AN -HS ANNEX TO A INVLSTIGAfION b;: THE POTENTIALS.(U)NUCLEAR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS(NEOP)o(U)
*NUCLEAR WARFARE CASUALTIES DEFENSE READINESS: AD-640 206SELECTED REFERENCES.(U)
A CORE TRAINING PROGRAM AD-403 670 VCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSFOR STATE LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE
PROGRAM PERSONNEL (APPENDICES)# (U) DEFINITION OF LOCAL AD-704 366*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS OPERATING AREASo(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSA CORE TRAINING PROGRAM AD-403 759
FOR STATE LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSE DEVELOP? E'? OF OVERALL AD-622 817PROGRAM PERSONNEL#(U) TRAINING PROGRAMS POR CIVIL
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS DEFENSE. (U)*CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL
CORRELATES OF YOUNG AD-686AMERICANS' BELIEFS AND KNOWLE. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AD-637 167ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE.(U) VALUES AND BELIEFS IN YOUNG
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS AMERICANS TOdARD FALLOUT SHELTERSAND CIVIL DEFENSE.(U)
THE COST AND AD-662 781 *FALLOIr SHELTERSFEAjIBILITY UF EMERGENCYCOOPERATION AMONG LOCAL THE DEVELOPMENT OF AD-637 168GOVERNMENTSt(U) VALUES AND BELIEFS IN YOUNG
T-3UNCLASSIFIED
T T UNCLASSIFIEDS~THE-THE
AMERICANS TOWARF FALLOUT SHELTERS AN EXPLORATORY STUDY TO AD-726 456AND CIVIL DEFENSE.(U) DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL
*FALLOUT SHELTERS HAZARD ON SHELTER MANAGEMENT8EHAVIOR,(U)
THE ECCNOMIC AD-625 172 *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEqSFEASIBILITY OF DECENTRALIZEDMETROPOLITAN REGIONS.(U) THE FALLOUT PROTECTION AD-600 438
*CIVIL DEFLNSE SYSTEMS BOOKLET: (III) A METHOOOLOGICALCOMPARISON OF PRE-TEST RESPONSFS OF
ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS AD-664 753 THOSE WHO RESPONDED, REFUSED, ORIN THE NEW ORLEANS METROPOLITAN WERE NOT REACHABLE ON THE POST-AREA,(U) TEST.(U)
*ECONOMICS *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF ADV692 876 FAMILY FINANCE AS A AD-711 056THE UNITED STATES USING THE COUNTY CONSTRAINT ON CIVIL DEFENSEAS A FUNCTIONAL BASE.(U) SYSTEMS,'U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
THE EFFECTS OF LOW AD-631 613 FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSE AD-612 706CREDIBLE SOURCES ON MESSAGE ORGANIZATION: THE RATIONALE OF Il'SACCEPTANCE: FOUR EXPERIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT,(U)STUDIES IN PERSUASION.(U) *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
*SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYFIRE BEHAVIOR, IGNITION AD-618 414
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS AD-637 766 TO FLASHOVER.(U)SIMULATION RESEARCH,:U) *NUCLEAR EXPLOSION DAMAGE
fC'VIL CEFENSE SYSTEMSFUEL VALUES AND BURNING AD-726 001
ENVIRCNMENTAL HEALTH AD-632 865 TIMES OF SELECTED FUEfL ARRAYS.(U)PLANNING FOR POSTATTACK CONDITIONS: *TEXTILESSOME PROBLEMS# PROGRAMS# ANDPRIORITIES.(U)' THE HOME FALLOUT AD-724 164
*MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROTECTION SURVEY AND COVMUNITYow SHELTER PLANS IN MICHIGAN: THEIR
EOC DATA DISPLAY AD-659 81z. IMPACT ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC.SYSTEM.(U) FAMILY COMMUNICATION ABOUT CIVIL
*DISPLAY SYSTEMS DEFENSE TOPICS: A REPORT OF TwOPILOT STUDIES.(U)
EVALUATION OF CIVIL AD-691 134 *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSDEFENSE OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS.CU)
*NUCLEAR WARFARE THE HOME FALLOUT AD-724 727PROTECTION SURVEY AND PESULTINI
EVALUATION OF COMMUNITY AD-646 996 CHANGES IN SHELTER ADOPTION.RESPONSE. TO FPHS PROGRAM.(U) SUMMARY REPORT.(U)
*ATTITUDES *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY AD-718 881 THE HOME FALLOUT AD-718 924OPERATIONS SIMULATION TRAINING.(Q) PROTECTION SURVEY IN MICHIGAN: :TS
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS IMPACT ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC,(U)*DISASTERS
Y-CUNCLASSIFIED
A ............ "
UNCLASSIFIEDIMP-NAT
IMPACT OF THE CUBAN AD-635 150 TRAINING.(U)MISSILE CRISIS. PATTERNS OF PUBLIC *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSI RESPONSE.(U)
*COLD WAR METHODOLOGY FOR AD-655 530ASSESSING TOTAL VULNERAqILITYI,(U)
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AD-649 835 *VdLtIERABILITYORDERED SPRAWL URBANCONFIGURATION. (U) METHODOLOGY FOR AD-639 751
*URBAN AREAS POSTATTACK RESEARCH.(U)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
INDICATORS OF SOCIAL AD-685 881VULNERABILITY: SOCIAL INDICATORS MODEL LARGE INDIVIDUAL AD-732 514IN CIVIL DEFENSE PLANNING AND SHELTER PLANS.(U)EVALUATION.(U) *SHELTERS
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSA MODEL LOCAL CIVIL AD-665 639
INSTALLATION AND AD-647 350 DEFENSE rRAINING PLAN: ANTESTING OF AN AUTOMATIC REMOTE ORGANIZATION AND TRAININGRADIOLOGICAL MONITORING SYSTEM.(U) DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH STUDY.(U)
*RADIATION MONITORS *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL CIVIL AD-615 725 A MODEL OF SOCIETY TO AD-726 961DEFENSE ORGANIZATIONS AND USE IN SYSTEMATIC AaALYSIS ANDPROGRAMS.(U) MANAGEVPENT PLANNING FOR SOCIETIES
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS UNDER STRESS: FURTHERDEVELOPMENT.(U)
INTRA EOC SYSTEMS AD-689 462 *NUCLEAR WARFAREANALYSIS.(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS MULTIDIMENSIONAL AD-622 714SCALING ANALYSIS AND'ITS
KINSHIP AND VOLUNTARY AD-653 466 APPLICATIONS FOR THE CIVIL DEFFMSEORGANIZATION IN POST-THERMONUCLEAR ORGANIZATIONP(U)
,ATTACK SOCIETY: SOME EXPLORATORY *CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNELSTUDIESt(U)
*SOCIOLOGY NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. AD-631 756OCD-OEP REGION 1.(U)
LEVELS OF ACTIVITYt(U) AD-609 094 *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS,*CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE. AD-631 757
MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING.( AD-722 870 OCD-OEP REGION 2.(U)U) *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
*MANAGEMENT ENGINEERINGNATIONAL LOCATION CODE. AD-631 758
MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS AD-642 145 OCD-OEP RE,ICN 3.(U)FOR CR1SIS CIVIL DEFENSE *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTE'4SPROGRAMS.(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS NATIONAL LOCATION COLE AD-631 759OCD-OEP RESION 4.(U)
MASS TRAINING AD-619 657 *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSTECHNIOUES IN CIVIL DEFENSE. If. AFURTHER STUDY OF TELEPHONIC ADJUNCT NATIONAL LOCATION CODE# AD-631 760
T-5UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDNAI-REV
OCD-OEP REGION 5.(U) *NUCLEAR WARIARE*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
A PILOT STUDY OF YOUNG AD-670 986NATIONAL LOCATION CODE, AD-b31 761 AMERICANS' 3ELIEFS AND KNOWLE:c-E
OCD-OEP REGION 6.(U) ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSE.(U)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
NATIONAL LOCATION CODEP AD-631 762 PUBLIC RESPONSE TO AD-728 849OCD-OEP REGION 7.(U) COMMUNITY SHELTER PLANNING: DES
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS MOINES AND POLK COUNTY, IOWA.APPENDICES.(U)
NATIONAL LOCATION CODE# AD-631 763 *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSOCD-OEP REGION 8z(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS PUBLIC RESPONSE TO AD-728 848COMMUNITY SHELTER PLANNING: DES
THE NEAR SYSTEM: A AD-601 011 MOINES AND POLK COUNTY, IOWA.STUDY Itq PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE.(U) SU:MMARY REPORT.(U)
*PUBLIC OPINION *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEmS
A NEW LOOK AT THE AD-622 096 THE PUBLIC'S PERCEPTION AD-711 118DESIGN OF LOW-BUDGET CIVIL DEFENSE OF LOCAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE EFFORTSSYSTEMS.(U) AND FACILITIESt(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEmS
NEW RATION CONCEPTS.(U) AD-684 936 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN AD-406 442*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS THE SOVIET CIVIL DEFENSE
PROGRAMC(U)
OCCUPATTONAL SKIILS AND AD-646 150 *CIVIL D0FENt SE SYSTV'..S
CIVIL DEFENSE,(U)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS AND AD-41O S15-
METHODS FOR IMPROVING LOCAL CIVOLOCD SOFT TARGET AD-601 467 DEFENSE TRAINING,(U)
STUDY.(U) *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
REQUIREMENTS FOR AD-695 641
ORGANIZING MUNICIPAL AD-426 430 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OFGOVERNMENTS FOR CIVIL DEFENSEs,(U) COUNTERMEASURES TO POSSIBLE
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS POSTATTACK FISCAL PROBLrMS.(U)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
ORIENTATION MANUAL ON AD-620 268= DISASTER PREPAREDNESS FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL AD-611 764
PHARP.ACi3TS,(U) PLANNING TO COVER HAZARIS OF*DISASTERS FALLOUT. VOLUME I.(U)
*CIVIL DEFENJSE SYSTE'4S
PERCEIVED EFFECTIVENESS AD-613 666OF AMERICA'S DEFENSESt(U) THE RESOLUTION OF THE AD-287 060
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS SOVIET CONTROVERSY OVER CIVILDEFENSE(U)
THE PERCEPTION OF LOCAL AD-710 302 *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSSURVIVAL CHANCES: AN EXPLORATORYEXPLANATIONt(U) REVIEW OF COMBINED AD-632 595
T-6UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIEDTHE-TES
TRAUMA: RESEARCH# CLINICAL STUDY.(U)
MANAGEMLNT AND PLANNINGw(U) *CIVIL uEFENSE SYSTEMS*NUCLEAR WARFARE CASUALTIES A STATISTICAL AD-668 938
THE ROLE OF THE DENTIST AD-604 274 INFORMATION SYSTE%* FOR ESTIMATINGIN NATIONAL DISASTER,(U) THa MAGNITUDE AND SCOPE OF NUCLEAR
*CIVIL DEFENSE ATTACKS.(U)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
THE ROLE OF THE AD-604 275PHARMACIST IN NATIONAL DISASTERP(U) STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL AD-401 226
*PHARMACOLOGY ASPECTS OF CIVIL DEFENSE WITHSPECIAL EMPHASIS ON CRISIS
SCENARIO-GAME MODEL FOR AD-664 178 SITUATIONS(U)THE EXERCISE AND EVALUATION Oý *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMSNATIONAL LEVEL CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS.(U) A STUDY OF CONSENSUS ON AD-730 360
*NATIONAL OEFENSE PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATED TO
RECOVERY FROM NUCLEAR ATTACK.(U)A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AD-624 702 *REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY)
OF SELECTED PARAMETERS BASED ON 8SMSAtS. (U) SUMMARY OF STUDIES OF AD-425 618
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD ANDINFORMATION ABOUT CIVIL DEFENSEe(U)
SOCIAL ACTION IN CIVIL AD-451 079 *ATTITUDESDEFENSE. THE STRATEGY OF PUBLICINVOLVEMENT IN A COUNTY CIVIL A SUMMARY OF THE FINAL AD-661 048DEFENSE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM.(U) REPORT LOCAL GOVERNING RODIES:
-;cxi. D;;,I S L,,• Tii~iR •,LLA;EC?: TO CIVIL DEFENSEiU)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
SOME PUBLIC VIEWS ON AD-609 202CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS,(U) SWISS CIVIL DEFENSE.(U) AD-624 929
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTE'4S
THE SOVIET CIVIL AD-606 690 A SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF AD-617 734DEFENSE PHOti.AM,(U) CIVIL DEFENSE ORGA0IZATION AT TYE
*CIVIL DcrENSE SYSTEMS REGIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LEVELS.INITIAL REPORT: SYSTEM DEFINITION
SPECIAL PROBLEMS OF AD-654 201 AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION,(U)CHILDREN IN CIVIL DEFENSE *CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMISPLANNING.(U)
*DISASTERS SYSTEM LINKAGES AMONG AD-651 049WOMEN'S ORGANIZATIONS: AN
STANDARLIZED TESTING AD-601 214 EXPLORATORY STUDY OF MEMBERSHID ANDFOR THE OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE LEA['ERSHIP LINKAGES AMOMG WOMEN'SRADIOLOvICAL MONITORING FOR FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS IN A LOCALINSTRUCTORS COURSE. (U) COMMUNITY. (U)
*PERFORMANCE TESTS *ORGANIZATIONS
A STATE CIVIL DEFENSE AD-644 619 TESTING CIVIL DEFENSE AD-408 967TRAINING PLAN: AN ORGANIZATION AND PLANS AND OPERATIONs AT THETRAINING DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS.(U)
T-7UNCLASSIFIED
g *' ~
UNCLASSIFIEDA T-THE
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
A THESAURUS OF CIVIL AD-611 438DEFENSE DESCRIPTORS. CIVIL DEFENSEINFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS.(U)
*INFORMATION RETRIEVAL
THREAT PERCEPTION AND AD-614 386CIVIL DEFENSE.(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
TRAINING REQUIREMENTS AD-624 870
FOR POSTATTACK ADAPTIVEBEHAVIO.-(U)
*CIVIL DEFELNSE SYSTEMS
U. So CIVIL DEFENSE AD-637 900BEFORE 1950: THE ROOTS OF PUBLICLAW 920.(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
THE USE OF SYSTEMS AD-712 314TECHNIQUES IN CIVIL DEFENSE#(U)
*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
THE USE OF VOLUNTARY AD-439 612ORGANIZATIONS IN CIVILIAN DEFENSE
. Id.'.. : z, U)*CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS
THE WARNING SYSTEM IN AD-714 991DISASTER SITUATIONS: A SELECTIVEANALYSIS.(U)
*DISASTERS
T-8UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CONTRACT INDEX
*OAHC20-67-C-0016 STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARKSTANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
CALIF F AD-684 936F AD-695 641 F AD-712 314
*DAHC20-67-C-0103 *DAHC20-67-C-0160SIMULMATICS CORP CAMBRIDGE MASS TECHNICAL OPERATIONS INC ARLINGTON
F AD-665 383 VA WASHINGTON RESEARCH CENTFRTOI-TR-67-4
*DAHC20-67-C-0116 • F AD-664 178STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK
CALIF *DAHC20-68-p-0122F AD-691 134 AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH
PITTSBURGH PA*DAHC20-67-Co0119 AZR-77802-f/71-FR
MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING F AD-726 456DEPT OF COMMUNICATION AIR-77804-7/71-FR
(OCO-4831-C) F AD-?32 514AD-670 986
2 S-AHC20-68-C-0151AD-686 303 HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEANHFPS-3 VA
AD-718 924 HSR-RR-71/4-VB-XAD-724 164 F AD-726 961
SDANC20-67-C-0122 *DAHC20-68-C-0162PITTSBUeGH UNIV PA DEPT OF WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP WALTHAM
SOCIOLOGY MASS ADVANCED STUDIES GROUPAD-6bl 167 W-4291
S AD-687 296 F AD-697 180S. AD-687 297S AO-687 381 ODAHC20-69-C-0103
AD-710 302 IOWA STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OFAD-711 118 -SOCIOLOGi AND ANTHROPOLOGY
SOCIOLOGY-87A*Dt-4C20-67-C-O023 F AD-728 848
IOWA STATE UNIV AI4S DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY-alBSOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY F AD-72s 849
RURAL SOCICLOGY-50F AD-670 016 *DAHC20-69-C-o0O7
RURAL SOCIOLOGY-50S RESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N C(0 )-4811-E) OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ECONOMICS
F AD-67u 017 DIVRURAL SOCIOLOGY-85A ,RTI-OU-427-P
F AD-724 7PI F AD-704 366
O)AHC20-67-C-0136 *DAHC20-69--r-0142HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN URS RESEARCH CO BURLINGAME CALIF
VA URS-757-1HSR-RR-68/12-BE AD-696 135
F AD-685 881
C-IUNCLASSIFIED
S-7-
UNCLASSIFIED
DAm-OCD
ODAHC20"69-C'0295 AD-600 990STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK AD-600 993
CALIF AD-601 014F AD-711 056
*OCD OS62 60*DAHC20-70-C-0293 DUNLAP AND ASSOCIATES INC DARIEN
UPS RESEARCH CO SAN MATEO CALIF CONNURS-793 F AD-408 967
F AD-718 881SOCO 0S62 71
*DAHC20-70-C-0302 COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK BUREAU OFSYSTEM SCIEN4CES INC BETHESDA MD APPLIED SOCIAL RESEARCH
F AD-7a6 955 AD-600 751AD-600 752
.ODAHC20-70-C-0380
HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN *OCD OS62 72VA CORNELL UNIV ITHACA N Y
HSR-RR-71/3-DI AD-439 612F Ab-730 360
*OCD 0S62 121*DAHC20-71-C-0219 APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES
FAUCETT (JACK) ASSOCIATES SILVER WAYNE PASPRING MD AD-403 759
F AD-732 948 AD-601 930AD-601 931
*NSF-e-1 309PITTSBUkGH UNIV PA DEPT OF *OCD 0S62 135
SOCIOLOGY STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK3 AD-649 541 CALIF
AD-651 167 AD-4S3 228S AD-687 296S AD-687 381 *O•D 0S62 144
AD-7i.O 302 RESEARCH TRIANGLE INST DURHAM N CR Ol81PT. 2
*OCDOO52 293 F AD-431 735AMERICAN MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION
WASHINGTOP D C *OCD OSb2 150AD-1,26 430 IOWA AGRICULTURAL AND HOME
ECONOMICS EXPERIMENT, STATIONSOCD OS62 18 AMES
HUDSON INST INC HARMON-ON-HUDSON N SR35Y F AD-451 013
HI-477-HR IOWA ENGINEERING EYPERIMENT STATIONAD-613 637 AMES
"RURAL SOCIOLOGY-34*OCD 0562 19 F AD-s51 079
MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSINGCOLL OF COMMUNICATION AR-S *OCD 0S62 178,AD-600 438 AP.LIEO t-SYCHOLOGICAL SERVICESAD-600 985 WAYNE PAALO-600 989 AD-611 214
:-2UNCLASSIFIED
tj
, K
UNCLASSIFIEDOCD-OCS
*OCD-OS-62-2b7 INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSESPITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF ARLINGTON VA EONOMIC AND
SOCIOLOGY POLITICAL STUDIES DIVAD'-643 719 STUDY s-16•
AD-612 706*OCO 0S62 277 STUDY-S-212
HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO FULLERTON CALIF AD-637 900FR-6%-16-66
F AD-601 467 *OCD-OS-63-141DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION AND
*OCD 0562 278 WELFARE WASHINGTON D CPLANNING RESEARCH CORP LOS ANGELES AD-632 595
CALIF
R409 *OCD 0S63 161AD-426 925 DUNLAP AND ASSOCIATES INC DARIEN
PRC-D-796 CONNF AD-625 172 ORD-64-110 VOL. 1
F - AD-611 764*OCO 0563 48
PITTSBUHGH UNIV PA *OCD-OS-63-184 .AD-601 011 STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARXAD-609 094 CALIFAD-609 095 AD-624 706AD-609 202 F AD-624 929
PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OFSOCIOLOGY *OCD-PS-63-65
AD-624 161 PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE WASHINGTON DS AD-649 543 C DIV OF HEALTH MOBILIZATION
PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF F AD-620 268SOCIOLOGY
AD-622 099 *OCD-PS-64-46OHIO STATE UNIV COLUMBUS DISASTER
*OCD 0S63 65 RESEARCH CENTERPUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE WASHINGTON D - DRC-SEA-9
C DIV OF HEALTH MOBILIZATION AD-714 991AD-604 27'AD-604 275 *OCD-PS-64-61
PITTSBURGH UNIV PA DEPT OF
*OCD-OS-63-114 SOCIOLOGYHUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH INC MCLEAN AD-635 150VA
HSR-RR-65/1-CR *OCD-PS-66-113A0-653 466 INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES
ARLINGTON VA PROGRAM ANALYSIS*OCD 0563 122 DIV
H(!vSON ;NST INC HARMON-ON-HUDSON N RP-P-511"Y (IDA/HO-69-10145)
361-RR/5 A0-692 876F AD-602 049
*OCS-CS-63-1 I*OCD-QS-63-134 HUMAN SCIEWC5 RESEARCH INC MCLEAN
C-3UNCLASSIFIED
................................t
V Fi
S!1ý
UNCLASSIFIEDOSD-PH-
VAHSR-RR-67/:-CR
F AD-654 201
S*OS OS 62 19MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING
COLL OF COMMUNICATION ARISAD-600 991
SPH-C6-64-134DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION AND
WELFARE WASHINGTON 0 CAD-632 S95
*PH-86-65-16RESEARCH TRIANGLE INST OUIIHAM N C
OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ECONOMICSDIV
R-OU-197
r AD-632 865
1
C-4i
UNCLASSIFIED
'i
UNCLASSIFIED
REPORT NUMBER INDEX
361-RR/5 F6-0-3.1/7AD-602 849 AD-631 762
AIR-77802-4/71"FP F6-D-3.1/8AD-726 456 AD-631 763
AIR-77804-7/71-FR FR'64-16-66AO-732 5;4 AD-601 467
AIR C92 6 63TRAO-410 515
k-I HFPS-3AD-631 613 AD-718 924
04-5 HI-477-RRAD-686 303 AD-6X3 637
BIBLIOGRAPHIC LIST-1i HI-478-RRAD-640 206 • AD-622 096
OOC-TAS-7o-45-1 HI-612-RRAD-705 500 AD-642 145
DOC-TAS-71-5 HI-647-RRAD-722 870 AD-639 751
DRC-SER-9 HI-777/2-RRAD-714 991 .AD-654 478
DR"-64-110 VOL. I HSR-RR-65/1-CRADO-61 7b4 AD-653 466
F6-0-3 *1/1 IHSR-RR-67/3-CRAD-631 756 AO-654 201 "
FO-D-3.1/2 HSR'RR-68/12-SEAD-631 7b7 AD-685 881
F0-D-3,1/3 HSR-RR-71/3-DIA0-631 758 AD-730 360
PF-0-3.1/4 HSR-RR-71/4-VB-XAD-631 759 AD-726 961
P6-0-3.1/5 IDA/*40V.65-3'48OAD-631 760 AD-612 706
FP0-3,1/6 IOA/HQ-65-3756AD-631 761 AD-637 900
R-1UNCLASSIFIED
t
. . . "- -.- .
UNCLASSIFIEDIDA-RUR
IDA/HQ-67-6832 R OU8IPT. 2AD-664 753 AO-431 735
IDA/HQ-69-10145 R-OU-157A0-692 876 AD-624 702
M46059 R-OU-1 58-1
AD-618 414•D -612 g99NOLTR-71-76
R-OU-197AD-726 001 AD-632 865OCO-4615A
RP-P-34,7-AD-668 938 AD-664 753
OCD-4811-E RP-P-S11A0-670 017 AD-692 876
OCO-4831-C RR4AD-670 986 A0-425 618
OCO-RR8 RR 63 3 RRA0-425 618 AD-102 09e
OCO-RR-11-REV RTI-'0-4327-2
AD-663 839 AD-704 366OCD-RR-17
RTf -R-OU-371-1AD-726 947 A')-681 273
OU-158-1 RUR"'. SOCIOLOGY-34A0-611 438 A')-451 079P-2554
RUR.,L SOCIOLOGY-4OA0-606 690 AD-623 918
, '2"m51 RURAL SOCIOLOGY-IOS
SAD-409 938 AD-623 9430'2752
A5-406 442 RURAL SOCIOLOGY-442AD-651 049
PRC-D-796 RURAL SOCIOLOGY-46-SAD-625 172 AD-661 048
PRC 0-1219 RURAL SOC IOLOG¥-50AD-649 835 A0-670 016Rlt09
RURAL SCC COLO6Y-50SAD-426 925 ,D-670 017
R-2UNCLASSIFIED
I*
UNCLASSIFIEDSDC-tIT-
RURAL SOC IOLOGY-85A URS-157-1AD-72'4 7;:7 AD-696 135
SOC-TH-L-'4202/O01/0O URS-7M3*0-689 462 AD-718 881
SOCLOLOGY-87A "-291AD-728 848 AD-697 180
SOC!OLOGY-878 WT-1194AD-.728 849 AD•-611 160
SR35AD-1451 013
SSD-65-245 (546)AD-62' 870
5TUDY S-184AD-612 706
STUOY-S-212AD-637 900
TN-3099/000/01AD-644 619
T14-3679AD-662 603
T*-3802•AD-665 639
THCL)-2600/O00/01AD-622 817
7t(L)-2938/001/00AD-637 ?66
MTwL)-2938/o02/00
AD-637 767
ToQ-TR-67-4AD-664 174
TR-660201. g03A*-647 350
TRANS-2600/D-669 989
R-3UNCLASSIFIED
[ UNCLASSIFIEDsecurity Cl.assification
DOCUMENT CON4TROL DATA - R& C(S"~ImIy classification of title. body' of abstroce a"d frdezing annrptun #wts .,uý be .'Id ..'h~n the om-1O,.1-i C * et...,J)
I Opt!GINA TING AC TI VITY V Co~pouft. oitha) A.6EOYCNT .. hSrCTO
D EFENSE DOCUMENTATION CENTER UnclassifiedCameron Station ab GRO~UP
Alexandria, Virginia 223143 REPORT TITLE
CIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: SOCIAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING
4 DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (2'p. .1 op~mntt wE Iu.isie t.Bibliography (August 196d August 1971)S AU THORIS3 (First noise. mwoinitial nl~ast "aS Rm)
Api 1972R DAT8VA TOTAL NO OF PAGES h "a, Noil pies'
April __ __ __ __1972__ __ 198 17 149S.CONTRAC T OR GRAN l NO. 99L, ORIGINAIOR'S MrPOfl1 .eJMREPISI
6. PROJECT NO DDC-TAS-72-l 1-I
C. Ob. OT..Ef RIEP9RI ,401S1 (Any oetrnumbpro thatgawy be seefgn.Ethis, repo")j
If. AD-740 92510 DISTROGUTION STATEMENT
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
- I SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 1.SPCNSZORING MIOLITARY ACTIVITY
Supersedes AD-705 500
12 AMISTRACI
This bibliography -- one in a series on Civil Defense Systems -
contains a compilation of references on Social Impact and Manage-ment Planning. Rcferences contained in this volume pertain topsychological factors related to recovery from nuclear attack;public response to community shelter planning; fallout sheltermanagement responsibilities; emergency operations training; attitudes
= toward civil defense; requirements for local planning to coverhazards of fallout; food processing and distribution; and the rolesof the dentist and pharmacists in national disasters. Entries wereprocessed into the Defense Documentation Center's data bank duringthe period of January 1953 through January 1972.
Other bibliographies in this series are: Preattack and Post-attack (Nuclear Warfare), and Shelters.
Corporate Author-Monitoring Agency, Subject, Title, Contract,and~ Report Number Indexes are included.
DDI NOV .. 413 UNCLASSIFIEDSe-cunty Clessificattonl
Z7.ZI
UNCLASSIFIEDSecurity C"a•$sifziation
Key WO14OS•
____________________________1_____________ i .
*Bibi iographies*Civil Defense Systems*Management Planning
Social ImpactCost EffectivenessS~ Economi cs
Public Opinion.SociologyTrainingCivil Defense PersonnelAttitudes
AcceptabilitySocial PsychologyFallout Shelters
UNCLASSIFIEDSecu~tty Classifiraton
