Social Cognitive Complete
-
Upload
ankit-dalal -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Social Cognitive Complete
![Page 1: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Social Cognitive approaches to Social Cognitive approaches to personalitypersonality
Themes and assumptions:Themes and assumptions:1.1. People are active agentsPeople are active agents2.2. Combines behavioral and humanistic Combines behavioral and humanistic
approachesapproaches3.3. Emphasizes cognitive processesEmphasizes cognitive processes4.4. Emphasizes social processesEmphasizes social processes5.5. Behavior is situation specificBehavior is situation specific6.6. Reciprocal determinismReciprocal determinism
Mutual effects of person and environmentMutual effects of person and environment
![Page 2: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Julian Rotter’s locus of controlJulian Rotter’s locus of control Behavior depends on Behavior depends on
1.1. Outcome expectancyOutcome expectancy– Expectancies = implicit judgements about Expectancies = implicit judgements about
our behaviorour behavior
2.2. Reinforcement valueReinforcement value
**reinforcement value depends on our **reinforcement value depends on our psychological needspsychological needs
![Page 3: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Rotter’s psychological needsRotter’s psychological needs
1.1. Recognition/statusRecognition/status2.2. DominanceDominance3.3. IndependenceIndependence4.4. Protection/dependencyProtection/dependency5.5. Love and affectionLove and affection6.6. Physical comfortPhysical comfort
![Page 4: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
RotterRotter Generalized expectanciesGeneralized expectancies Specific expectanciesSpecific expectancies
http://www.ballarat.edu.au/ard/bssh/http://www.ballarat.edu.au/ard/bssh/psych/rot.htmpsych/rot.htm
Locus of controlLocus of control– Internal locus of controlInternal locus of control– External locus of controlExternal locus of control
![Page 5: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ScoringScoringScore one point for each Score one point for each
of the following:of the following: 2.a, 3.b, 4.b, 5.b, 6.a, 7.a, 9.a, 2.a, 3.b, 4.b, 5.b, 6.a, 7.a, 9.a, 10.b, 11.b, 12.b, 13.b, 15.b, 10.b, 11.b, 12.b, 13.b, 15.b, 16.a, 17.a, 18.a, 20.a, 21.a, 16.a, 17.a, 18.a, 20.a, 21.a, 22.b, 23.a, 25.a, 26.b, 28.b, 22.b, 23.a, 25.a, 26.b, 28.b, 29.a. 29.a.
A high score = External Locus of Control A high score = External Locus of Control A low score = Internal Locus of Control A low score = Internal Locus of Control
![Page 6: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Henry Stack SullivanHenry Stack Sullivan Emphasized the social selfEmphasized the social self
Personality changes as a function of our Personality changes as a function of our relationships with other peoplerelationships with other people
Illusion of individualityIllusion of individuality = there is not = there is not single, fixed personalitysingle, fixed personality– personality is combo. of individual inclinations personality is combo. of individual inclinations
and social situationand social situation
““chums”chums”
![Page 7: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Interpersonal CircumplexInterpersonal CircumplexAxes:Axes:1.1. ControlControl2.2. AffiliationAffiliation
Closer types are Closer types are more related than more related than those further awaythose further away
ComlimentarityComlimentarity correspondence correspondence
along affiliation axisalong affiliation axis Reciprocity along Reciprocity along
dominance axisdominance axis
![Page 8: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Mischel’s critiqueMischel’s critique Traits do not predict behaviorTraits do not predict behavior
Used correlation coefficient Used correlation coefficient rr
Several problems with his analysis:Several problems with his analysis:1.1. Don’t expect traits to be perfect predictors of Don’t expect traits to be perfect predictors of
behaviorbehavior2.2. Assumption that r = .3 or .4 is not meaningfulAssumption that r = .3 or .4 is not meaningful3.3. Mischel was wrongMischel was wrong
![Page 9: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mischel’s modified attemptMischel’s modified attempt Shoda, Mischel, & Wright (1994)Shoda, Mischel, & Wright (1994)
observations of children at campobservations of children at camp
Found considerable differences in Found considerable differences in behaviors across situationsbehaviors across situations
behavioral signaturesbehavioral signatures
![Page 10: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
StructureStructure1.1. expectancies (beliefs)expectancies (beliefs)2.2. self-systemself-system
efficacy expectancyefficacy expectancy = self-efficacy = self-efficacy– effort and persistenceeffort and persistence– moodmood– CopingCoping
What leads to self-efficacy?What leads to self-efficacy?1.1. Persuasion and verbal supportPersuasion and verbal support2.2. Vicarious reinforcement – watching models perform successfullyVicarious reinforcement – watching models perform successfully3.3. Personal successPersonal success4.4. Physiological cues (how your body is feeling)Physiological cues (how your body is feeling)
Note: self-efficacy is usually task specificNote: self-efficacy is usually task specific
![Page 11: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Structure continuedStructure continued
3.3. GoalsGoals - desired future events that - desired future events that motivate the personmotivate the person
4.4. Competencies/skillsCompetencies/skills
![Page 12: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ProcessProcess anticipated consequencesanticipated consequences
internal standardsinternal standards
self-reinforcementself-reinforcement
![Page 13: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Growth & DevelopmentGrowth & Development Observational learningObservational learning
AKA: vicarious learningAKA: vicarious learningmodelingmodeling
4 factors that impact observational learning:4 factors that impact observational learning:
1.1. attention for encodingattention for encoding2.2. retentionretention3.3. production production 4.4. performanceperformance
![Page 14: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Famous Observational Learning Famous Observational Learning StudiesStudies
Bobo Doll Study (Bandura, 1965; 1977)Bobo Doll Study (Bandura, 1965; 1977)1.1. Group1 = aggression rewardedGroup1 = aggression rewarded2.2. Group2 = aggression punishedGroup2 = aggression punished3.3. Group3 = aggression no consequencesGroup3 = aggression no consequences
**acquisition vs. performance difference**acquisition vs. performance difference
Learning delay of gratification:Learning delay of gratification:Bandura & Mischel, 1965; 1986Bandura & Mischel, 1965; 1986
![Page 15: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
In-class AssignmentIn-class Assignment
Given the evidence concerning Given the evidence concerning observational learning, what would one observational learning, what would one expect to be the effects of watching expect to be the effects of watching television on children? On adults? Which television on children? On adults? Which characteristics of television might be characteristics of television might be important? Why? Is it likely that altruistic important? Why? Is it likely that altruistic behavior would be modeled as readily as behavior would be modeled as readily as aggressive behavior? Why or why not?aggressive behavior? Why or why not?
![Page 16: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Modeling of aggressionModeling of aggression
1.1. observational learningobservational learning2.2. promotes belief that aggression is promotes belief that aggression is
appropriate appropriate 3.3. desensitizes observersdesensitizes observers
E.g. StudyE.g. Study
Positive modeling examplesPositive modeling examples
![Page 17: Social Cognitive Complete](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083011/55cf85c2550346484b9120d0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Psychopathology & Behavior Psychopathology & Behavior ChangeChange
Role of dysfunctional expectanciesRole of dysfunctional expectancies
– Anxiety and self-efficacyAnxiety and self-efficacy– Depression and self-efficacyDepression and self-efficacy
Therapy/Change:Therapy/Change:– Modeling and Guided MasteryModeling and Guided Mastery