Social Capital and Social Networks: developing the research agenda Mike Savage & Gindo Tampubolon....
-
Upload
mackenzie-lyons -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Social Capital and Social Networks: developing the research agenda Mike Savage & Gindo Tampubolon....
Social Capital and Social Networks: developing the research
agenda
Mike Savage & Gindo Tampubolon.
ESRC Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC) &
Sociology, University of Manchester
Issues we address
1. Why social networks are important to social capital
2. Network dynamics: what a case study of the ties in three organisations in the NW of England tells us about the mechanisms which produce social capital
3. The changing social capital of corporate elites (Gindo)
4. Network analysis using sample surveys: the Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion Survey
An aside: Promoting Social Network Analysis project
Mike Savage, Nick Crossley, John Scott, Gindo Tampubolon, Alan Warde, ESRC funded 2002-2006.
Aims are to create a high profile team to promote SNA which will– Produce research exemplars in the areas of social
capital; elite structures; consumption; innovation– Run training courses and hold conferences – Develop mailing lists and ‘network’– Develop international links– Collaborate with inter-disciplinary research centres
(e.g. CRIC, CRESC) to cross fertilise with research ‘leaders’
1) Why social networks are important to social capital
The social capital agenda offers new potential for SNA because of its leading theorists all emphasise that networks are central.‘features of social organization such as networks, norms, and social trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit’ (Putnam 1996: 67). ‘the core idea of social capital theory is that social networks have value….. social capital refers to connections among individuals – social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise from them’ (Putnam 2000: 19),
‘social capital is the aggregate of the actual or potential resources which are linked to possession of a durable network of more or less institutionalized relationships of mutual acquaintance and recognition’
(Bourdieu 1996: 51),
Networks and the ambivalence of social capital
• Network methods are also essential in allowing us to explore the positive and negative aspects of social capital. Consider – connectedness– ‘the old boys club’– Cliques– ‘structural holes’ and the potential to build
bridges
Networks are a fundamental part of social capital
• Consider Putnam’s increasing interest ‘informal’ social capital in his more recent work
• Research increasingly doubtful that formal associational membership necessarily conveys significant social capital
• Freitag• Claiborn and Morris
Recent British research
Using the BHPS, Li, Pickles and Savage (2005) constructed three different measures of social capital
- membership of formal organisations- neighbourhood relations- social networks
The analysis showed that these three factors were independent of each other and had different kinds of effects.
Formal organisations were the least effective in generating social trust.
Logistic regression on social trust by types of social capital (top quartile compared to bottom)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Neighbour Network Membership
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Current survey questions on networksThese issues explain why there is so much current interest in finding indicators
for social capital include measures for networks
Notably, the ONS Social Capital Question Bank includes questions on ‘Interaction, social networks, social support’ in large surveys
proximity of friends, relativesperceived barriers to contact with friends, relativesHas someone to rely on outside householdReceived practical helpDepth of socialisation networksperceived norms of social supportSocial relations at work
These questions can be asked easily but have several problems:- - uncertain how far perceptions match the actual structure of social support- confuse social capital with its outcomes- Are ‘ego-centred’, and do not allow us to evaluate the structure of networks in
the community at large
We need to think harder about how to use network approaches
The potential of social network analysis SNA examines the ties (networks) between points, using graph theory and other
mathematical models. It has a number of distinct features• Keen to study whole populations, hence allowing systematic analysis of the structure
of roles and relationships.• Interest less in individual attributes, and more in the extent and nature of ties to
others
It has wide applications and its ideas have become social science orthodoxy: most famously
• The strength of weak ties (Granovetter)• The remaking of urban community (Fischer; Wellman)• Corporate elites organised around constellation of interests (Scott)
By way of background UK researchers were key in the early history of social network analysis, especially the LSE/
Manchester anthropologists (Bott, Barnes, Mitchell).
Although there continue to be distinguished SNA researchers in the UK (e.g Everitt, Scott), there is no school of SNA researchers here.
However in North America and parts of Europe SNA has flourished (with specialist journals, conferences, etc), and has produced important contributions to studies of e.g innovation, elite structures, social movements, health, family and community.
There are still significant limits to applying SNA to study social capital. Why?
• Limits of network questions on sample surveys, and the problem of sample surveys themselves.
• Although it often uses case studies, its’ reliance on formal methods for mapping networks, means it is not a standard ‘qualitative’ method.
• Need for specialist software (e.g. UCINET, PAJEK)• Lack of research exemplars showing its potential for
addressing substantive research questions. • Lack of UK centres of excellence and possibility of
research training.
2) Case study of social movements in NW England
Our aims were to examine the structure of social ties amongst all the members of three local organisations: a branch of Labour Party; conservation group; a branch of an ecological Group, 1999-2000.
Three phase research: (a) postal questionnaire; (b) in-depth interview and © life histories
Obtains information on all the members of these groups, and their ties to others across different dimensions
1
2
3
4
5
6
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1718
19
20
21
2223
24
25
26272829303132
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49 50
51
52 5354
5556
57
58
5960
61
62
6364
65
6667
6869
70
7172737475
76
77
78
7980
81 82
83
8485
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
9394
95
96
97
98
99
100
101102
103
104
Pajek
Note Respondents were asked ‘with whom do you discuss things to do with the organisation (for example, activities, issues, strategy)’.
Communication networks within the conservation group
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1415
16
17
1819
20
212223
24
2526
2728
29
30
31
32
33 34
3536
3738
3940
4142
43
44
45
4647
4849
5051
52 53
5455
56
57
58
59
60
61
6263
64
65
6667
68
69
70717273747576
77
787980
8182
83
84
85
8687
8889
90
91
9293
949596979899
Pajek
Note Respondents were asked ‘with whom do you discuss things to do with the organisation (for example, activities,
issues, strategy)’.
Communication networks within the environmental group
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1819
20
21
22
23 2425
26
27
28
2930
31
32
33
Pajek
Implications
We can use SNA to question important aspects of the arguments about social capital. SNA allows us to map social capital mechanisms more directly:
1. Cores become less trusting2. Different models of organising cores3. Cores find different methods of reproducing
themselves
Social capital is generated around tensions and fractures, rather than consensus and community
4) The position generator and social networks
We have seen some difficulties in using sample surveys to capture aspects of social networks
1. The extent and structure of ties between whole (or quasi-whole) populations
2. The extent to which relationships are reciprocal.
Yet it will not always be feasible to conduct research on whole populations. In the UK and Canada, but not, hitherto, in the UK, an alternative ‘position generator’ question has been developed to rectify this problem.
Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion Project
• Directed by Tony Bennett, Elizabeth Silva, Mike Savage and Alan Warde
• Seeks to develop new measures for cultural, economic and social capital.
• Contains national survey of 1564 respondents, 28 focus groups, and 60 in-depth interviews.
• Early papers on CRESC website
The position generator question` On this card is a list of jobs. Please tell me whether you happen to
know anyone socially who has any of these jobs? Please include friends and relatives
1. Secretary2. Solicitor3. Clerical officer in national or local government4. Bus or coach driver5. Bank of building society manager6. Factory worker7. University/ college lecturer8. Electrician9. Nurse10. Sales or shop assistant11. Postal worker
01
02
03
04
0P
erc
ent
0 2 4 6Number of memberships in civic organisations
05
10
15
Pe
rcen
t
0 2 4 6 8 10Range of social networks
Figure 2 Number of civic memberships and social contactsSource: Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion Survey (2003) (same below).
Range of contacts vary by social group
Age 18-35: mean of 3.59: 36-60: 4.43, 61+: 2.70
Gender Male 3.92: Female 3.61
Class Professional and managerial 4.34: intermediate 3.87: working class, 3.11
Regression on social trust
• Civic membership has coefficient of .174** with social trust
• Those with contact with have co-efficientsprofessional and managerial .247*
intermediate .120working class - .269*
• Those who only know professionals and managers are the most trusting of all (1.067**)
The nature of social contacts thus makes important differences to trust and reveal how trust is the result of privileged social location
ConclusionsSocial networks offer a different approach to social capital that
questions some of the ‘benevolent’ interpretations
Trust and belonging may arise from tension and conflictSocial capital is not evenly distributed, and middle class networks are most effective in
conveying its advantagesSocial capital does not depend primarily on associational membership. We need to
understand the dynamics of associations to assess if and how they generate social capital
Position generator question can be useful in allowing the conflictual nature of social capital to be registered on sample surveys.
Social capital is not a ‘magic bullet’. It is a resource which is contested and which helps reproduce unequal social relationships, though it can also be a resource for those who contest these inequalities