SMP Executive Summary

16

description

Summary of the SMP

Transcript of SMP Executive Summary

Page 1: SMP Executive Summary
Page 2: SMP Executive Summary

The City of Asheville’s Sustainability Management Plan (Plan) emerged from ambitious City goals and initiatives to take a leadership role in both the community and the nation to address important issues of resource conservation and climate protection. The Plan allows the City to address the “call to action” regarding sustainable government operation and community development by providing an integrated approach for resource management and addressing the full spectrum of local government services, including transportation, buildings, public facilities, street lighting, water, solid waste,

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y

Page 3: SMP Executive Summary

and land use planning. The Plan focuses on energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction solutions, best practices, and institutional/policy recommendations to improve sustainable government operations. The outcome of the Plan is a consensus-based set of sustainability goals, a comprehensive list of action items, and an implementation plan for moving forward. Provided herein is an executive summary of the Plan, for which the full document can be downloaded at http://www.ashevillenc.gov/green

Page 4: SMP Executive Summary

F o C U S o n C l I M A T E C h A n g EOne indicator used to measure sustainability is the level of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), are emitted by natural and human sources and trap the sun’s heat in the atmosphere, similar to a greenhouse. There is consensus among the scientific community that GHG emissions are increasing dramatically and are affecting temperature and precipitation patterns globally. Climate change has multiple and far-reaching environmental, economic, and social effects.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) projects that the effects of climate change on the state of North Carolina could include increased temperatures in all seasons, impacts to water supply and water quality, increased incidence of flash flood events, and the loss of plant and animal species that have adapted to the State’s historical climate. Accordingly, the City has taken a proactive approach to reducing emissions from City operations.

In April 2007, Asheville City Council passed a resolution committing the City to an 80 percent reduction in GHG emissions by 2050 at a rate of 2 percent each year. This presents an ambitious goal in keeping with the City’s desire to be a model of sustainable operations. Asheville’s commitment to this reduction goal was the principle impetus for this Plan. Because GHG emissions are, in part, the result of fossil fuel combustion, the link between energy consumption and GHG emissions in City operations is apparent. This includes electricity, natural gas, gasoline, diesel and biodiesel used in streetlights, buildings, parks, water treatment and pumping, fleet vehicles, transit buses, and employee commuting vehicles. A GHG inventory was conducted in 2001, establishing a baseline year from which reduction efforts could be measured, and were reassessed in FY 2007.

Page 5: SMP Executive Summary

Summary of Current GHG EmissionsGHG emissions from City operations in FY 2007 were 36,216 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MTCO2e), which is similar to the energy needed to power 3,295 homes or to run 6,633 passenger vehicles for one year.

The breakdown in emissions shows that City buildings are the largest single emitter, followed by water systems, vehicle fleet, employee commuting, street lighting, and the Asheville transit system.

Buildings27.8%

Water21.9%

Vehicle Fleet16.7%

Employee Commuting

14.3%

Streetlights11.9%

Transit7.1%

Distribution of the City’s GHG emissions

FY07 GHG Emissions from City Operations

Page 6: SMP Executive Summary

“Reduction Goals” GHG Emissions(2% Annual decrease from FY07)

35,980

MTCO

2e

40,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

35,000

30,000

ForecastedFY15

ForecastedFY25

ForecastedFY47*

ForecastedFY50

NO-ACTION37,912

40,473

46,73450,219

GHG Emission ForecastThe emission forecast compares the City’s current GHG emission growth rates with the 2 percent annual reduction goal. The difference between the two scenarios shows the gap in reductions as the annual reduction of 719.60 MTCO2e leads to the 80 percent reduction in 2047. Accordingly, by 2050, GHG emissions in the City would decrease from 35,980 MTCO2e to 5,036 MTCO2e – a decrease of 86 percent.

Forecasted emissions based on achievement of the reduction goals

0

ActualFY07

30,223

23,027

7,195 5,036

REDUCTION GOALS

*FY47 is the year the 80% reduction target should be met

50,000

45,000

Page 7: SMP Executive Summary

S U S T A I n A b I l I T Y V I S I o n & g U I d I n g P R I n C I P l E SA consensus-based definition of sustainability and key sustainability principles provide the underlying foundation for the Plan and constitute a vision for Asheville’s future. For Asheville, being sustainable means:

“Making decisions that balance the values of environmental stewardship, social responsibility and economic vitality to meet our present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.”

Accordingly, the City of Asheville strives toward sustainability in business strategy, policies and operations, and aims to demonstrate leadership to the community by the following guiding principles:

• Engaging and educating our employees and community about the challenges climate change presents, as well as driving a collaborative process to implement innovative solutions.

• Promoting inter-departmental collaboration for short- and long-term solutions to enhance the City’s organizational excellence and financial efficiency.

• Modeling responsible energy management through efforts in energy efficiency and renewable energy generation.

• Addressing climate change through strategic management of our City facilities, transportation resources, water supply, infrastructure, land use planning, and solid waste.

• Supporting continued development of a diverse regional green economy.

• Measuring, monitoring and communicating the City’s progress toward a defined goal set.

City of Asheville’s

Page 8: SMP Executive Summary

Focus Areas & Sustainability GoalsEvery major sector of Asheville’s City government has a role in advancing the sustainability vision. This vision will be realized when departments and individuals use these guiding principles to influence their actions. To build upon the vision, focus areas for improvement and strategic actionable goals were developed by the Office of Sustainability, the Sustainability Advisory Committee for Energy and the Environment, and Department Directors. These focus areas and strategic goals cut across the City’s organizational structure and require interdepartmental and intergovernmental coordination.

Focus Area Goal

Management Practices

Incorporate sustainability into the City’s decision-making process

Provide adequate resources for the implementation of sustainability programs

Increase the City’s use of environmentally preferable products & services

Employee Education

Incorporate sustainability into City communication & outreach efforts

Increase voluntary employee energy conservation efforts through education

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Participate in the City’s energy management strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

Land UseDevelop & redesign land use policies to support regional sustainable growth

Support and redesign development projects, patterns, & building practices

Facilities

Reduce energy consumption from City facilities through demand reduction and energy efficiency

Increase renewable energy use of City operations

Support the Resolution for LEED® certification for new City building

Transportation

Reduce vehicle miles traveled by City employees for commuting

Reduce total fuel consumption of City fleet vehicles

Increase transit ridership

Establish a long term funding strategy for public transportation

Support the reduction of vehicle miles traveled by City residents and visitors

Water

Continue to provide clean drinking water

Reduce water consumption by City facilities

Reduce energy use associated with treatment and distribution

Increase renewable energy use for water production and distribution

Support responsible consumption of water by residents and visitors

Solid WasteReduce solid waste disposed at landfills from City facilities

Increase our role as state leaders in sanitation and recycling

Sustainability Focus Areas and Goals

Page 9: SMP Executive Summary

S U M M A R Y o F T h E P l A n

8Focus Areas

23goal Areas

107Action Items

The Plan is intended to advance the City toward meeting the overarching GHG reduction goal. The Plan is aligned with the sustainable vision and guiding principles, and utilizes the identified focus areas and goals to structure the assessment of current progress and the identification of opportunities for improvement. The Plan is organized in four sections:

Section 1: IntroductIon – Identifying the City’s definition and vision of sustainability is a critical first step and establishes a foundation upon which all sustainability initiatives are based. The approach for managing sustainability activities in the short- and long-term timeframes is also an important first step, and is discussed in detail. The focus areas of the Plan are introduced and sustainability goals are presented.

Section 2: Assessment – The City of Asheville recognizes that, in order to determine future sustainability actions, a comprehensive understanding of the City’s current status is needed. In response, a thorough assessment of the current conditions, programs and important contextual factors was conducted. The assessment, which is aligned with the focus areas, serves as the basis for recommendations in Sections 3 and 4.

Section 3: opportunItIes – Guided by the sustainability vision, goals and current status assessment, recommendations for further action are presented for each focus area. Recommendations reflect technical analysis, industry best practices, facilitated discussions with key stakeholders, and emerging and innovative methods, all of which are tailored to address the goals and targets identified at the outset.

Section 4: next steps – The opportunities identified in Section 3 are organized, aligned with the strategic goals, and ranked according to a variety of criteria. As a result, a list of prioritized action items that will to lead to the achievement of Asheville’s sustainability goals is generated and will be used for future planning activities by the Office of Sustainability. In addition, an implementation plan that includes the establishment of metrics, targets and monitoring plans for the sustainability goals is presented.

Page 10: SMP Executive Summary

City of Asheville, North Carolina Prioritized Action Items Aligned with Sustainability Goals

Main support needed through inter-agency coordination

Main support needed through policy guidance

Main support needed through management team leadership

Main support needed through Green Team

Main support needed by the Office of Sustainability

Main support needed from existing staff

Main support needed through capital dollars

Opportunities for a More Sustainable FutureA total of 107 recommended actions are identified in all of the focus areas, representing a range of next steps for the City to take in the areas of buildings, transportation, water systems, solid waste, land use, and education to address the associated goals. The 107 action items consist of emission reduction strategies, best practices, and institutional/policy recommendations, appropriate for implementation at all levels of City government. The following graphic shows the distribution of these opportunities, organized by goal and organizational leadership category.

Management Practices

Employee Education

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Land Use

Facilities

Transportation

Water

Solid Waste

Inco

rpor

ate s

usta

inab

ility i

nto

the C

ity's

decis

ion-

mak

ing

proc

ess

Prov

ide a

dequ

ate r

esou

rces

for t

he im

plem

enta

tion

of su

stain

abilit

y pro

gram

s

Incr

ease

the C

ity's

use o

f env

ironm

enta

lly p

refe

rabl

e pro

duct

s & se

rvice

s

Incr

ease

volu

ntar

y em

ploy

ee co

nser

vatio

n ef

forts

Parti

cipat

e in

the C

ity’s

ener

gy m

anag

emen

t stra

tegy

to re

duce

gre

enho

use g

as e

miss

ions

Inco

rpor

ate s

usta

inab

ility i

nto

City

com

mun

icatio

ns &

out

reac

h ef

forts

Deve

lop

and

rede

sign

land

use p

olici

es to

supp

ort s

usta

inab

le gr

owth

Supp

ort s

usta

inab

le de

velo

pmen

t pro

jects

, pat

tern

s, an

d bu

ildin

g pr

actic

es

Redu

ce en

ergy

cons

umpt

ion

from

City

facil

ities t

hrou

gh d

eman

d re

duct

ion

& en

ergy

effic

iency

Incr

ease

rene

wabl

e ene

rgy u

se fo

r City

ope

ratio

ns

Supp

ort R

esol

utio

n fo

r LEE

D® certi

ficat

ion

for n

ew C

ity b

uild

ings

Redu

ce ve

hicle

mile

s tra

veled

by C

ity em

ploy

ees f

or co

mm

utin

g

Redu

ce to

tal f

uel c

onsu

mpt

ion

from

City

flee

t veh

icles

Esta

blish

a lo

ng te

rm fu

ndin

g st

rate

gy fo

r pub

lic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Supp

ort t

he re

duct

ion

of ve

hicle

mile

s tra

veled

by C

ity re

siden

ts an

d vis

itors

Cont

inue

to p

rovid

e clea

n dr

inkin

g wa

ter

Redu

ce w

ater

cons

umpt

ion

by C

ity fa

ciliti

es

Redu

ce en

ergy

use

asso

ciate

d wi

th tr

eatm

ent a

nd d

istrib

utio

n

Incr

ease

rene

wabl

e ene

rgy u

se fo

r wat

er p

rodu

ctio

n an

d di

strib

utio

n

Supp

ort r

espo

nsib

le co

nsum

ptio

n of

wat

er b

y res

iden

ts an

d vis

itors

Redu

ce th

e am

ount

of s

olid

was

te g

oing

into

land

fills

from

City

facil

ities

Incr

ease

our

role

as st

ate l

eade

rs in

sani

tatio

n an

d re

cycli

ng

Incr

ease

tran

sit ri

ders

hip

20

OPPO

RTUN

ITIE

S

181614

12

108

642

0

Page 11: SMP Executive Summary

For implementation to be successful, mechanisms for prioritizing the recommended actions are needed, and a structure for organizing the responsible entities should be identified. Opportunities, however, will “ripen” at different rates and for different reasons. Accordingly, the Plan provides a flexible approach for implementation and recognizes that opportunity is based on a variety of logistical, financial, technical, and other variables that change over time.

Ranking Criteria for OpportunitiesTo help organize the opportunities, the Plan contains a dynamic ranking system that prioritizes all the recommendations according to various factors. A rating protocol was applied that generated a score for each action item based on the following criteria: • Existence of current program or activity • Environmental benefit • Economic benefit • Social benefit • Financial incentive • Personnel availability and capacity • Technical feasibility • Stakeholder concerns • Regulatory requirement • Contribution to established goals • Timeframe to realize benefits

To select future actions and initiatives, users of the Plan can sort the opportunities by any of the above criteria, or by a series of ranking or organizing parameters, including: • A composite ranking score representing the combined criteria listed above. • A “triple bottom line score,” which highlights how well each opportunity balances

the environmental, economic, and social benefits. • A qualitative ranking, listing opportunities as high, medium,

and low priority, which is informed by the previous two quantitative scores. • The opportunities were matched with the goal set,

to allow sorting by individual goals. • Opportunities were grouped by implementation categories representing the

City’s organizational leadership, to help individuals in the organization identify how they contribute to implementing solutions.

I M P l E M E n T I n gT h E P l A n

Page 12: SMP Executive Summary

• Visioning • Policy Guidance

• Vision - Alignment• Communication• Implementation

• Review Goals and Initiatives

• Coordinate Resources

• Implement Projects• Inter-departmental• Outcome Focused

Organizational structure for implementing the City of Asheville’s sustainability program

City Council SACEE

City Manager Assistant City Manager Office of Sustainability

Department Directors

Implementation Team…

Champions

Steering Committee

Implementation Team 1

Advisory Council

Implementation Team 2

STRATEGY

IMPLEMENTATION

Organizational Structure for ImplementationImplementing the diverse opportunities identified in the plan requires leadership and engagement from multiple levels of management and staff from all components of City government. Implementation requires an organizational structure, with specific roles, responsibilities and accountabilities defined for each level in the organization. The Plan identifies a protocol that can be utilized to develop implementation teams with defined roles to implement each action or group of actions, and further provides templates for developing action plans, identifying metrics and developing targets, and monitoring and measuring progress.

ConTInUEd IMPRoVEMEnT TowARd A SUSTAInAblE AShEVIllEApproaching sustainability in a coordinated and organized manner is important to Asheville’s success. As such, the City of Asheville employs a “sustainability performance management system” to guide the City’s efforts. The management system approach presented in the Plan encourages a continual reassessment of goals and emphasizes consistent monitoring of performance and communication of results to create a feedback loop for continual improvement of sustainability performance. As a product and representation of the management system for the City’s sustainability program, the Plan is intended to be a continuously evolving document. This Plan can and should be a catalyst for continuous evolution toward a more sustainable, resilient Asheville.

Page 13: SMP Executive Summary

STAKEHOLDERENGAGEMENT

Continual PerformanceImprovement

Management System Approach to Improving Sustainability

Establish Vision and Strategic Goals1

Conduct Assessment2

Identify & Rank Opportunities3Select Actions

& Set Targets4

Develop Action & Monitoring Plans5

ImplementInitiatives6

MonitorPerformance7 Communicate

Progress8

Page 14: SMP Executive Summary
Page 15: SMP Executive Summary
Page 16: SMP Executive Summary