2018 Rail Plan Executive Summary Rail Plan Executive Summary
SMP Executive Summary
-
Upload
maggie-ullman -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
description
Transcript of SMP Executive Summary
![Page 1: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The City of Asheville’s Sustainability Management Plan (Plan) emerged from ambitious City goals and initiatives to take a leadership role in both the community and the nation to address important issues of resource conservation and climate protection. The Plan allows the City to address the “call to action” regarding sustainable government operation and community development by providing an integrated approach for resource management and addressing the full spectrum of local government services, including transportation, buildings, public facilities, street lighting, water, solid waste,
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
![Page 3: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
and land use planning. The Plan focuses on energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction solutions, best practices, and institutional/policy recommendations to improve sustainable government operations. The outcome of the Plan is a consensus-based set of sustainability goals, a comprehensive list of action items, and an implementation plan for moving forward. Provided herein is an executive summary of the Plan, for which the full document can be downloaded at http://www.ashevillenc.gov/green
![Page 4: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
F o C U S o n C l I M A T E C h A n g EOne indicator used to measure sustainability is the level of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), are emitted by natural and human sources and trap the sun’s heat in the atmosphere, similar to a greenhouse. There is consensus among the scientific community that GHG emissions are increasing dramatically and are affecting temperature and precipitation patterns globally. Climate change has multiple and far-reaching environmental, economic, and social effects.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) projects that the effects of climate change on the state of North Carolina could include increased temperatures in all seasons, impacts to water supply and water quality, increased incidence of flash flood events, and the loss of plant and animal species that have adapted to the State’s historical climate. Accordingly, the City has taken a proactive approach to reducing emissions from City operations.
In April 2007, Asheville City Council passed a resolution committing the City to an 80 percent reduction in GHG emissions by 2050 at a rate of 2 percent each year. This presents an ambitious goal in keeping with the City’s desire to be a model of sustainable operations. Asheville’s commitment to this reduction goal was the principle impetus for this Plan. Because GHG emissions are, in part, the result of fossil fuel combustion, the link between energy consumption and GHG emissions in City operations is apparent. This includes electricity, natural gas, gasoline, diesel and biodiesel used in streetlights, buildings, parks, water treatment and pumping, fleet vehicles, transit buses, and employee commuting vehicles. A GHG inventory was conducted in 2001, establishing a baseline year from which reduction efforts could be measured, and were reassessed in FY 2007.
![Page 5: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Summary of Current GHG EmissionsGHG emissions from City operations in FY 2007 were 36,216 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MTCO2e), which is similar to the energy needed to power 3,295 homes or to run 6,633 passenger vehicles for one year.
The breakdown in emissions shows that City buildings are the largest single emitter, followed by water systems, vehicle fleet, employee commuting, street lighting, and the Asheville transit system.
Buildings27.8%
Water21.9%
Vehicle Fleet16.7%
Employee Commuting
14.3%
Streetlights11.9%
Transit7.1%
Distribution of the City’s GHG emissions
FY07 GHG Emissions from City Operations
![Page 6: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
“Reduction Goals” GHG Emissions(2% Annual decrease from FY07)
35,980
MTCO
2e
40,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
35,000
30,000
ForecastedFY15
ForecastedFY25
ForecastedFY47*
ForecastedFY50
NO-ACTION37,912
40,473
46,73450,219
GHG Emission ForecastThe emission forecast compares the City’s current GHG emission growth rates with the 2 percent annual reduction goal. The difference between the two scenarios shows the gap in reductions as the annual reduction of 719.60 MTCO2e leads to the 80 percent reduction in 2047. Accordingly, by 2050, GHG emissions in the City would decrease from 35,980 MTCO2e to 5,036 MTCO2e – a decrease of 86 percent.
Forecasted emissions based on achievement of the reduction goals
0
ActualFY07
30,223
23,027
7,195 5,036
REDUCTION GOALS
*FY47 is the year the 80% reduction target should be met
50,000
45,000
![Page 7: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
S U S T A I n A b I l I T Y V I S I o n & g U I d I n g P R I n C I P l E SA consensus-based definition of sustainability and key sustainability principles provide the underlying foundation for the Plan and constitute a vision for Asheville’s future. For Asheville, being sustainable means:
“Making decisions that balance the values of environmental stewardship, social responsibility and economic vitality to meet our present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.”
Accordingly, the City of Asheville strives toward sustainability in business strategy, policies and operations, and aims to demonstrate leadership to the community by the following guiding principles:
• Engaging and educating our employees and community about the challenges climate change presents, as well as driving a collaborative process to implement innovative solutions.
• Promoting inter-departmental collaboration for short- and long-term solutions to enhance the City’s organizational excellence and financial efficiency.
• Modeling responsible energy management through efforts in energy efficiency and renewable energy generation.
• Addressing climate change through strategic management of our City facilities, transportation resources, water supply, infrastructure, land use planning, and solid waste.
• Supporting continued development of a diverse regional green economy.
• Measuring, monitoring and communicating the City’s progress toward a defined goal set.
City of Asheville’s
![Page 8: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Focus Areas & Sustainability GoalsEvery major sector of Asheville’s City government has a role in advancing the sustainability vision. This vision will be realized when departments and individuals use these guiding principles to influence their actions. To build upon the vision, focus areas for improvement and strategic actionable goals were developed by the Office of Sustainability, the Sustainability Advisory Committee for Energy and the Environment, and Department Directors. These focus areas and strategic goals cut across the City’s organizational structure and require interdepartmental and intergovernmental coordination.
Focus Area Goal
Management Practices
Incorporate sustainability into the City’s decision-making process
Provide adequate resources for the implementation of sustainability programs
Increase the City’s use of environmentally preferable products & services
Employee Education
Incorporate sustainability into City communication & outreach efforts
Increase voluntary employee energy conservation efforts through education
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Participate in the City’s energy management strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
Land UseDevelop & redesign land use policies to support regional sustainable growth
Support and redesign development projects, patterns, & building practices
Facilities
Reduce energy consumption from City facilities through demand reduction and energy efficiency
Increase renewable energy use of City operations
Support the Resolution for LEED® certification for new City building
Transportation
Reduce vehicle miles traveled by City employees for commuting
Reduce total fuel consumption of City fleet vehicles
Increase transit ridership
Establish a long term funding strategy for public transportation
Support the reduction of vehicle miles traveled by City residents and visitors
Water
Continue to provide clean drinking water
Reduce water consumption by City facilities
Reduce energy use associated with treatment and distribution
Increase renewable energy use for water production and distribution
Support responsible consumption of water by residents and visitors
Solid WasteReduce solid waste disposed at landfills from City facilities
Increase our role as state leaders in sanitation and recycling
Sustainability Focus Areas and Goals
![Page 9: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
S U M M A R Y o F T h E P l A n
8Focus Areas
23goal Areas
107Action Items
The Plan is intended to advance the City toward meeting the overarching GHG reduction goal. The Plan is aligned with the sustainable vision and guiding principles, and utilizes the identified focus areas and goals to structure the assessment of current progress and the identification of opportunities for improvement. The Plan is organized in four sections:
Section 1: IntroductIon – Identifying the City’s definition and vision of sustainability is a critical first step and establishes a foundation upon which all sustainability initiatives are based. The approach for managing sustainability activities in the short- and long-term timeframes is also an important first step, and is discussed in detail. The focus areas of the Plan are introduced and sustainability goals are presented.
Section 2: Assessment – The City of Asheville recognizes that, in order to determine future sustainability actions, a comprehensive understanding of the City’s current status is needed. In response, a thorough assessment of the current conditions, programs and important contextual factors was conducted. The assessment, which is aligned with the focus areas, serves as the basis for recommendations in Sections 3 and 4.
Section 3: opportunItIes – Guided by the sustainability vision, goals and current status assessment, recommendations for further action are presented for each focus area. Recommendations reflect technical analysis, industry best practices, facilitated discussions with key stakeholders, and emerging and innovative methods, all of which are tailored to address the goals and targets identified at the outset.
Section 4: next steps – The opportunities identified in Section 3 are organized, aligned with the strategic goals, and ranked according to a variety of criteria. As a result, a list of prioritized action items that will to lead to the achievement of Asheville’s sustainability goals is generated and will be used for future planning activities by the Office of Sustainability. In addition, an implementation plan that includes the establishment of metrics, targets and monitoring plans for the sustainability goals is presented.
![Page 10: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
City of Asheville, North Carolina Prioritized Action Items Aligned with Sustainability Goals
Main support needed through inter-agency coordination
Main support needed through policy guidance
Main support needed through management team leadership
Main support needed through Green Team
Main support needed by the Office of Sustainability
Main support needed from existing staff
Main support needed through capital dollars
Opportunities for a More Sustainable FutureA total of 107 recommended actions are identified in all of the focus areas, representing a range of next steps for the City to take in the areas of buildings, transportation, water systems, solid waste, land use, and education to address the associated goals. The 107 action items consist of emission reduction strategies, best practices, and institutional/policy recommendations, appropriate for implementation at all levels of City government. The following graphic shows the distribution of these opportunities, organized by goal and organizational leadership category.
Management Practices
Employee Education
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use
Facilities
Transportation
Water
Solid Waste
Inco
rpor
ate s
usta
inab
ility i
nto
the C
ity's
decis
ion-
mak
ing
proc
ess
Prov
ide a
dequ
ate r
esou
rces
for t
he im
plem
enta
tion
of su
stain
abilit
y pro
gram
s
Incr
ease
the C
ity's
use o
f env
ironm
enta
lly p
refe
rabl
e pro
duct
s & se
rvice
s
Incr
ease
volu
ntar
y em
ploy
ee co
nser
vatio
n ef
forts
Parti
cipat
e in
the C
ity’s
ener
gy m
anag
emen
t stra
tegy
to re
duce
gre
enho
use g
as e
miss
ions
Inco
rpor
ate s
usta
inab
ility i
nto
City
com
mun
icatio
ns &
out
reac
h ef
forts
Deve
lop
and
rede
sign
land
use p
olici
es to
supp
ort s
usta
inab
le gr
owth
Supp
ort s
usta
inab
le de
velo
pmen
t pro
jects
, pat
tern
s, an
d bu
ildin
g pr
actic
es
Redu
ce en
ergy
cons
umpt
ion
from
City
facil
ities t
hrou
gh d
eman
d re
duct
ion
& en
ergy
effic
iency
Incr
ease
rene
wabl
e ene
rgy u
se fo
r City
ope
ratio
ns
Supp
ort R
esol
utio
n fo
r LEE
D® certi
ficat
ion
for n
ew C
ity b
uild
ings
Redu
ce ve
hicle
mile
s tra
veled
by C
ity em
ploy
ees f
or co
mm
utin
g
Redu
ce to
tal f
uel c
onsu
mpt
ion
from
City
flee
t veh
icles
Esta
blish
a lo
ng te
rm fu
ndin
g st
rate
gy fo
r pub
lic tr
ansp
orta
tion
Supp
ort t
he re
duct
ion
of ve
hicle
mile
s tra
veled
by C
ity re
siden
ts an
d vis
itors
Cont
inue
to p
rovid
e clea
n dr
inkin
g wa
ter
Redu
ce w
ater
cons
umpt
ion
by C
ity fa
ciliti
es
Redu
ce en
ergy
use
asso
ciate
d wi
th tr
eatm
ent a
nd d
istrib
utio
n
Incr
ease
rene
wabl
e ene
rgy u
se fo
r wat
er p
rodu
ctio
n an
d di
strib
utio
n
Supp
ort r
espo
nsib
le co
nsum
ptio
n of
wat
er b
y res
iden
ts an
d vis
itors
Redu
ce th
e am
ount
of s
olid
was
te g
oing
into
land
fills
from
City
facil
ities
Incr
ease
our
role
as st
ate l
eade
rs in
sani
tatio
n an
d re
cycli
ng
Incr
ease
tran
sit ri
ders
hip
20
OPPO
RTUN
ITIE
S
181614
12
108
642
0
![Page 11: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
For implementation to be successful, mechanisms for prioritizing the recommended actions are needed, and a structure for organizing the responsible entities should be identified. Opportunities, however, will “ripen” at different rates and for different reasons. Accordingly, the Plan provides a flexible approach for implementation and recognizes that opportunity is based on a variety of logistical, financial, technical, and other variables that change over time.
Ranking Criteria for OpportunitiesTo help organize the opportunities, the Plan contains a dynamic ranking system that prioritizes all the recommendations according to various factors. A rating protocol was applied that generated a score for each action item based on the following criteria: • Existence of current program or activity • Environmental benefit • Economic benefit • Social benefit • Financial incentive • Personnel availability and capacity • Technical feasibility • Stakeholder concerns • Regulatory requirement • Contribution to established goals • Timeframe to realize benefits
To select future actions and initiatives, users of the Plan can sort the opportunities by any of the above criteria, or by a series of ranking or organizing parameters, including: • A composite ranking score representing the combined criteria listed above. • A “triple bottom line score,” which highlights how well each opportunity balances
the environmental, economic, and social benefits. • A qualitative ranking, listing opportunities as high, medium,
and low priority, which is informed by the previous two quantitative scores. • The opportunities were matched with the goal set,
to allow sorting by individual goals. • Opportunities were grouped by implementation categories representing the
City’s organizational leadership, to help individuals in the organization identify how they contribute to implementing solutions.
I M P l E M E n T I n gT h E P l A n
![Page 12: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Visioning • Policy Guidance
• Vision - Alignment• Communication• Implementation
• Review Goals and Initiatives
• Coordinate Resources
• Implement Projects• Inter-departmental• Outcome Focused
Organizational structure for implementing the City of Asheville’s sustainability program
City Council SACEE
City Manager Assistant City Manager Office of Sustainability
Department Directors
Implementation Team…
Champions
Steering Committee
Implementation Team 1
Advisory Council
Implementation Team 2
STRATEGY
IMPLEMENTATION
Organizational Structure for ImplementationImplementing the diverse opportunities identified in the plan requires leadership and engagement from multiple levels of management and staff from all components of City government. Implementation requires an organizational structure, with specific roles, responsibilities and accountabilities defined for each level in the organization. The Plan identifies a protocol that can be utilized to develop implementation teams with defined roles to implement each action or group of actions, and further provides templates for developing action plans, identifying metrics and developing targets, and monitoring and measuring progress.
ConTInUEd IMPRoVEMEnT TowARd A SUSTAInAblE AShEVIllEApproaching sustainability in a coordinated and organized manner is important to Asheville’s success. As such, the City of Asheville employs a “sustainability performance management system” to guide the City’s efforts. The management system approach presented in the Plan encourages a continual reassessment of goals and emphasizes consistent monitoring of performance and communication of results to create a feedback loop for continual improvement of sustainability performance. As a product and representation of the management system for the City’s sustainability program, the Plan is intended to be a continuously evolving document. This Plan can and should be a catalyst for continuous evolution toward a more sustainable, resilient Asheville.
![Page 13: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
STAKEHOLDERENGAGEMENT
Continual PerformanceImprovement
Management System Approach to Improving Sustainability
Establish Vision and Strategic Goals1
Conduct Assessment2
Identify & Rank Opportunities3Select Actions
& Set Targets4
Develop Action & Monitoring Plans5
ImplementInitiatives6
MonitorPerformance7 Communicate
Progress8
![Page 14: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: SMP Executive Summary](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042900/568bf1121a28ab893391dbab/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)