SMC Design overview of the construction and project issues
-
Upload
fulton-larson -
Category
Documents
-
view
50 -
download
3
description
Transcript of SMC Design overview of the construction and project issues
SMC Design overview of the
construction and project issuesJ.C. Perez
on behalf of SMC collaboration team
M. Bajko, B. Bordini, S. Canfer, G. Ellwood, J. Feuvrier, M. Guinchard, M. Karppinen
C. Kokkinos, P. Manil, A. Milanese, L. Oberli, F. Regis, G. De Rijk
EUCARD-WP7-HFM Short Model Coil review
12 December 2011
2
OUTLINE IntroductionWhat’s SMC?FEM modelsSMC coils and structureManufacturing steps and magnet assemblySMC#1 coils fabrication and cold powering tests
resultsSMC#2 coils fabricationSMC#3_a coils fabrication and cold powering
tests resultsSMC#3_b coils fabrication Conclusion
12
/12
/20
11
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
3
INTRODUCTION
12
/12
/20
11
◦ The SMC project started in 2007 as a CERN-CEA-RAL-LBNL collaboration (NED 1.5)
◦ SMC is a way to test Nb3Sn cables in a small racetrack magnet and reach 12 T on the cable
◦ SMC is a modified version of the subscale magnet of LBNL
◦ SMC has been used to cross-check results using different codes formulations(CAST3M, ANSYS, ROXIE, Vector fields OPERA)
◦ Several coil configurations have been produced in the different laboratories and cold tested in a common structure at CERN
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
4
WHAT’s SMC?1
2/1
2/2
01
1
SMC is a tool to learn and test :
Technologies needed for a Nb3Sn based high field magnet fabrication:
• Cable insulation• Coil reaction• Coil impregnation• Trace fabrication• Bladder fabrication Techniques of coil fabrication and magnet assembly• Winding • Coil instrumentation and Protection• Structure instrumentation• Magnet assembly with bladders and keys• Nb3Sn/Nb-Ti cable connection
SMC is a tool to qualify: Nb3Sn cables in a real magnet configuration
SMC is the “STEP 0” to build a Nb3Sn accelerator magnet at CERN
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
5
FEM Models
12
/12
/20
11
CATIAANSYS Design Modeler
ANSYS Mechanical
Assembly Design
Geometry Design
Contact Regions
Meshing Process
Parametric Coil Block
Courtesy of C. Kokkinos
See more details in the presentation made by C. Kokkinos
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
6
SMC Coils1
2/1
2/2
01
1
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
• Double pancake race-track coil configuration
• High field zone located in the straight part of the central island thanks to the presence of end-spacers
• Titanium spacers & end-saddles• Nb3Sn/NbTi splice integrated in the
end-saddle connection side• Instrumented with Vtaps and stain
gauges using dedicated printed circuits (“Traces”)
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
7
SMC Structure
12
/12
/20
11
KeysYoke
Shell
Bladders
Coil packCoil pads
Rods
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
SMC configuration
Coil pack and Iron yoke mounted in the
instrumented Al2219 T851 shell
8J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT1
2/1
2/2
01
1
Iron yoke
Vertical key
Lateral pad
Vertical pad Longitudinal rods
Longitudinal compressing system for the rods
Racetrack coil
10
SMC assembly 1
2/1
2/2
01
1
Assembly Parts
Coils & Rods Shell & Yoke Pads Bladders
KeysShims
Assembly Overview
Keys insertion Electrical connectionsJ.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
11
SMC#1coil fabrication
12
/12
/20
11
2 double pancakes wound @ CERN in collaboration with RAL using “Low performance” cable (14 x Ø1.25 mm Alstom IT with low Jc from NED)
Cables insulated with S2-Glass tape wrapped with 50% overlap Coils reacted @ RAL in TWO different furnaces and reaction tooling Coils instrumented and potted @ RAL in collaboration with CERN using TWO
different moulds Coils fabrication dates:
Coil #1 made in November 2009. Coil #2 made in March 2010
Cold test 1: Magnet limited to 3915 A. Quench detected in one Nb3Sn/NbTi splice of coil# 2 : 40 nOhms contact
resistance measured Cold test 2: Single coil powering configuration using coil #1.
Only one quench detected in layer 1
All other quenches detected in layer 2 and never in the splice area
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
12
SMC#1: Cold Powering Tests
12
/12
/20
11
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 180
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
SMC1 Powering Tests (One coil configuration)
@ 4.2K @ 1.9KShort Sample limit
Quench Nr
I (A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 140
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
SMC1 one coil
SMC1 two coils
strand 4.2 K
B peak coil [T]
I [A
]
Courtesy of A. MilaneseJ.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
13
SMC#2 coil fabrication @ CEA
12
/12
/20
11
One coils wound with PIT EAS 14 x Ø1.25 mm strand Cable insulation made of 2 layers of Hiltex S2-Glass tape +
ceramic precursor (CEA formulation) Cable wrapped at CERN in June 2010 First coil wound at CEA in July 2010
Impregnation Setup
Insulated cable
Winding operationCoils not assembled in the structure, not cold tested.
Coils fabrication stopped in June 2011 at the CSP (Comite Suivi Protocol) of the Exceptional French Contribution. See detailed presentation by F. Rondeaux J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-
MDT
14
SMC#3_a coils fabrication @ CERN • 2 coils for SMC3 with PIT 14 x Ø1.25 mm strand with Ti-
islands and spacers wound in November 2010• Cable insulated with S2-Glass sleeve (FNAL type)• Electrical insulation of the central island on the layer
jump area with ceramic 989F • Heat treatment in a vacuum furnace @ CERN• Coils potted using Epoxy NY 750 & Jeffamine D-400 • Electrical problems, no longitudinal pre-load • Magnet assembled in May 2011• 1st assembly: 2 runs of cold powering tests performed in
the new vertical test station (SM18) in June and September 2011
• 2nd : reloading to increase pre-stress on coils and magnet retested in December 2011
12
/12
/20
11
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
15
SMC#3_a Assembly Configuration
12
/12
/20
11
Shell-Azim.strain [μm/m] Coil-Normal stress σx (MidPlane) [Mpa]
Coil-VM stress (MidPlane) [Mpa]
Initial strain
value @ 0,3_Theta
@300K @4.2K @Iss
@300K @4.2K @Iss
@300K @4.2K @Iss
500 500 1320 1275 -47 -133 -126 37 125 153
340 340 1196 1228 -34 -123 -116 24 114 140
673 673 1598 1608 -69 -147 -147 47 137 164
SMC3 1st test
run June 2011
SMC3 Reload and 3rd test run
November 2011
SMC3 2nd test
run 2011
VK 1(mm)
VK 2(mm)
VK 3(mm)
VK 4(mm)
HK 1(mm)
HK 2(mm)
Rod 1(µm/m)
Rod 2(µm/m)
Shell_0_T(µm/m)
Shell_3_T(µm/m)
6.65 6.9 6.5 6.8 10.5 10.5 82 44 541 477
FINAL CONDITION @ 293 K – SMC3 June 2011
VK 1(mm)
VK 2(mm)
VK 3(mm)
VK 4(mm)
HK 1(mm)
HK 2(mm)
Rod 1(µm/m)
Rod 2(µm/m)
Shell_0_T(µm/m)
Shell_3_T(µm/m)
6.65 6.8 6.5 6.8 11 10.7 55 32 706 648
FINAL CONDITION @ 293 K – SMC3_ November 2011
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
See detailed presentation by Ch. Kokkinos
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 10010000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
16000
Run 3 with higher pre-stress
Run 1 Run 2 after thermal cycle
12.82 T
13.92 T
SMC#3 Training
@ 1.9 K
@ 4.2 K
Iss@ 1.9 K( opera 3D)
Iss@ 4.3 K( opera 3D)
Quench history
Qu
en
ch c
urr
en
t, I
q [
A]
85 % Iss @4.2K74 % Iss @4.2K
95 % Iss @4.2K
91 % Iss @1.9K
SMC#3_a cold tests results
1612
/12
/20
11
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
See detailed presentation by M. Bajko
17
SMC#3_b coils fabrication status and program
12
/12
/20
11
• Status • 2 coils for SMC3_b using PIT 14 x Ø1.25 mm strand
with Ti-islands and spacers wound in September 2011• Electrical insulation of the central island and spacers
with Al2O3 plasma spray coating
• Cable insulated with S2-Glass sleeve (FNAL type)
• Plan• Heat treatment on Argon atmosfere furnace @ CERN• Coils to be potted using Epoxy NY 750 & Jeffamine D-
400 • Magnet assembly scheduled Q1-2012
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT
18
Conclusions 7 SMC coils have been produced until today 2 SMCs : SMC#1 and SMC# 3 have been completely assembled
and cold tested 2 types of Nb3Sn cables (IT and PIT) have been used 2 types of insulation techniques, tape and sleeve, have been
tried Bladder design and production have been qualified The impregnation method, using an open mold, shows good
results for this type of coils Lessons learned during SMC#1 fabrication and applied for
SMC#3 improved significantly the magnet performance The excellent results obtained with SMC#3_a assembly must be
confirmed on SMC#3_b where we seek to repeat performance and eliminate electrical problems between coils and spacers
The SMC project is a perfect example of efficient collaboration between different teams and laboratories
12
/12
/20
11
J.C. Perez / TE-MSC-MDT