Smart/Soft Power CT/COIN/Stability Strategy -> GlobalServiceAcademy@GovIsland (PowerofMyth-4thru6)

Power of MythMetaphoric or Historic?

Symbolic or Literal?

Partial Transcripts – Programs 4-6

Power of MythTopics – Programs 4-6

Masks of Eternity - #6

• Participation in divinity

• The experience of being alive

• In the East the gods are elemental

• About Jesus

• Do you believe in a personal God?

• What is religion

• Jung – the circle

• The pollen path of the Navajo

• Tibetan sand mandala

• Archetypes of the unconscious

• Elementary ideas

• The Trickster

• The image of god is your basic obstruction

• Maslow – peak experience

• Joyce – epiphanies

• The sublime

• The Buddhas – peaceful and wrathful

• The experience of the eternal

• Schopenhauer – The composed order of life

• Follow your bliss

• Shiva – lord of the dance

• Metaphors

• AUM

Love & Goddess - #5

• The troubadours

• Love as Eros

• Agape – Christian love

• Traditional marriage

• Tristan and Isolde

• Libido over credo

• The holy grail

• God is love

• Satan’s fall

• Love your enemies

• Tibet

• Abelard

• The Goddess

• The Mother Goddess

• A Vedic story

• Our Mother

• Warrior gods

• The Virgin Mother

• Kundalini

• Isis and Osiris

• Madonna and child

• Male and female – yin and yang

• The inner reaches of outer space

Sacrifice & Bliss - #4

• A sacred place

• The Bushmen – hunters & gatherers

• From hunting to planting

• An Algonquin story

• A Polynesian story

• New Guinea ritual

• The sacrifice of the mass

• The two trees in the Garden

• The sacrificial ballgame of the Mayan

• The Iroquois sacrifice

• The Jesus dance

• The lord of death is the lord of sex

• The head hunt of Indonesia

• Schopenhauer – the sacrifice of oneself for the other

• The sacrifice of motherhood

• Marriage – sacrifice to the relationship

• About death

• The message of the myth

• Sir Gawain & the Green Knight

• Nietzsche – The three Transformations of the spirit

• To follow your bliss

• The wheel of fortune

• Sat Chit Ananda

1-of-15

Power of MythSacrifice and Bliss - Program 4

JC: Words of Chief Seattle – 1852 - The president in Washington sends word that he wishes to buy our land. But how can you buy or sell the sky—the land? The idea is strange to us. Every part of this earth is sacred to my people. Every shining pine needle – every sandy shore – every mist in the dark woods – every meadow – all are holy in the memory and experience of my people – we’re part of the earth and it is part of us. The perfumed flowers are our sisters – the bear, the deer, the great eagle, these are our brothers – each ghostly reflection in the clear water of the lakes tells of events and memories in the life of my people – the waters murmur as the voice of my father’s father – the rivers are our brothers – they carry our canoes and feed our children.

If we sell you our land – remember – that the air is precious to us – that the air shares its spirit with all the life it supports – the wind that gave our grandfather his first breath also receives his last sigh.

This we know – the earth does not belong to man – man belongs to the earth – all things are connected like the blood that unites us all – man did not weave the web of life he is merely a strand in it – whatever he does to the web he does to himself.

Your destiny is a mystery to us – what will happen when the buffalo are all slaughtered – what will happen when the secret corners of the forest are heavy with the scent of many men – and the view of the ripe hills is blotted by talking wires –the end of living and the beginning of survival – when the last red man has vanished with his wilderness – and his memory is only the shadow of a cloud moving across the prairie – will these shores and forests still be here? Will there be any spirit of my people left?

We love this earth as a newborn loves its mother’s heartbeat – so if we sell you our land -- love it as we have loved it—care for it as we have cared for it – hold in your mind the memory of the land as it is when you receive it – preserve the land for all children and love it as god loves us all – one thing we know – there is only one god -- no man – be he red man or white man can be apart – we are brothers after all.

BM: Introduction – Sacred places – Delphi, Machu Picchu, Stonehenge, Jerusalem –we recognize these as places where societies came together to express their spiritual concerns. But for some very early societies as JC points out in his historical atlas of world mythology – the whole earth was a sacred place . . . our ancestors saw the sacred in everything around them – the voices of the gods spoke from the wind and thunder and the spirit of god flowed in every mountain stream – it was a geography not of city and nation-states – but of sacred places –- the realm of the mythic imagination – as our ancestors turned from hunting to planting – the stories they told to interpret the mysteries of life changed too . . . to spiritual visionaries this image reveals a divine truth as well as a principle of life itself – from death comes life – from sacrifice – bliss . . . the relationship of myth to landscape . . .

2-of-15


A sacred place

BM: What does it mean to have a sacred place?

JC: This is a term I like to use now as an absolute necessity for anybody today. You must have a room or a certain hour a day or so where you do not know what was in the newspapers that morning – you don’t know who your friends are – you don’t know what you owe to anybody – you don’t know what anybody owes to you – but a place where you can simply experience and bring forth what you are – what you might be. This is the place of creative incubation.

And first you may find that nothing is happening there – but if you have a sacred place and use it and take advantage of it something will happen.

BM: This does for you what the plains did for the hunters and gatherers?

JC: For them the whole thing was a sacred place – do you see – but most of our action is economically or socially determined and does not come out of our life. I don’t know whether you’ve had the experience I’ve had – as you get older the claims of the environment on you are so great you hardly know where the hell you are – what is it you intended – you’re always doing something that is required of you. This minute –that minute – another minute – where is your bliss station? You know? Try to find it –get a phonograph and put on the records the music that you really love – even if it’s corny music that nobody else respects – I mean the one that YOU like – or the book you want to read -- get it done and have a place in which to do it – there you get the thou feeling of life – these people had it for the whole world that they were living in --

The Bushmen – hunters & gatherers

BM: We talked about the effect of the spreading plain on mythology – this plain clearly bounded by a circular horizon with that great blue dome of an exalting heaven above –hawks and eagles hovering – the blazing sun passing – night moon rising – and I can see the effect on people’s stories of that – but what about the people who lived in the dense foliage of the jungle?

JC: Total transformation of environment and of psychology and everything else – no horizon – no dome of the sky – a lot of birds up there – and heavy vegetation underneath with scorpions and poisonous serpents – and in between distances of trees and trees and trees – no sense of perspective.

Colin Turnbull tells us of a marvelous story of bringing a pygmy out of the forest. He brings this pygmy who had never been out of the jungle out on to a mountain top --and suddenly they come over the hill and there’s an extensive plain out there and the poor little fellow was utterly terrified – had no way of judging perspective and distance – he thought the animals grazing on the plane out there were so small they were ants – that they were just across the way – totally baffled – he rushes back into the forest –you have a different mythology there – you have a different relationship to the hunt and everything else.

3-of-15


JC: The forest is home – you are at home in the forest – where you and I would be ill at ease thinking what’s behind that tree and all – the sense of the beautiful, simple delight in their forest and their deity is the master of the forest – the forest master.

BM: What impresses me is that these people – the hunters and searchers for the roots or the berries – they’re participating in their landscape – they are part of that world. And it becomes sacred to them. Place becomes sacred.

JC: Absolutely. Every feature of it does.

BM: We moderns are stripping the world of its natural revelations.

JC: I know it.

BM: I think of the wonderful pygmy legend of the little boy who finds the bird of the most beautiful song in the forest.

JC: And he brings it home and he asks his father to bring food for the bird and the father doesn’t want to feed only a bird – and one time the father kills the bird and when he killed the bird he killed his own life and he died.

BM: And the legend says “The man killed the bird and with the bird he killed the song and with the song himself.” Isn’t that a story about what happens when human beings destroy their environment – destroy their world – destroy nature and the revelation of nature.

JC: Destroy their own nature.

BM: Human nature too – they kill the song?

JC: They kill the song.

BM: And isn’t mythology the story of the song?

JC: Mythology is the song – it’s the flight of the imagination inspired by the energies of the body and in it’s life.

From hunting to planting

BM: What happened as human beings turned from the hunting of animals to the planting of seeds? What happened to the mythic imagination?

JC: Well, I try to think of it this way – an animal as I think I’ve said before – is sort of a total entity and when you kill that animal that animal is dead – but when you cut down a plant - new sprouts come out - pruning is helpful to a plant – also in forests where a good deal of the origination of myth is to be recognized -- out of rot comes life – even in these forests here of the beautiful redwoods – I was in a wonderful forest in Mendocino and there, there are some great, great stumps from enormous trees that were cut down some decades and decades ago and out of them are coming these bright new little children who are part of the same plant.

4-of-15


JC: So there’s a sense of death as not death somehow – that death is required for new fresh life and so on – and the individual isn’t quite an individual. He is a member of a plant – Jesus uses the term you know where he says “I am the vine – you are the branches” that vineyard idea is a totally different one from the separate entity of the animal.

BM: And this makes a difference on the stories you tell?

JC: OH! The whole feeling of what life is.

BM: What stories did this experience of the planter give rise to? Your favorite stories in plant mythology.

JC: Well, the cutting up and burial and then growing of the plant world – the world of the plant that you eat being already a cut-up dead body is the dominant motif in most of the tales – it occurs all over the place – particularly in the Pacific cultures and in the Americas.

BM: Tell me that story of the origin of maize as Longfellow borrowed it from the Algonquians.

An Algonquin story

JC: Well, it’s an Algonquin story and it is simply of the boy in his vision – he sees a young man come to him with plumes on his head . . . visitant – invites the young man to a wrestling match and allows him to win – and when this happens 3 or 4 times – but he tells him the last time I come you must kill me and bury me and take care of the place where you will have buried me. And the boy in the last one actually does what he has been told to do -- plants the man/the visitant – and in time comes back and sees the corn growing. And it was a boy who had been concerned for his father who was a hunter but old and he was thinking isn’t there some other way to get food besides this one – and so it came to him out of his intentions – it’s a lovely story.

BM: Some other way of getting food than hunting – but the idea is this visitor this figure in the vision has to die and be buried before the plant can grow from the remains of his body.

JC: That’s the main theme – almost the duplicate of this one comes up throughout Polynesia for instance.

A Polynesian story

BM: There’s one in Polynesia about the legend of the maiden Hina – do you remember that one?

5-of-15


JC: Well, all of the legends in the Polynesian area have a maiden named Hina. And she’s associated with the moon – the death and resurrection of the moon is a dominant theme. The girl who loves to bathe in a certain pool and there is a great eel that is swimming around in the pool day after day he scrapes across her thigh as she’s bathing and then one fine lovely day he turns into a young man and he becomes her lover for a moment and then goes away and comes back again and back again and then one time when he comes he says – just as the Algonquin visitant – now next time I come to visit you – you must kill me. And cut off my head and bury my head. And she does so and there grows from the buried head a coconut tree and when you pick a coconut and look at the coconut you can see that it is just the size of the head and you can see eyes and things and the little nodules that simulate the head.

BM: So what you have is the same story springing up in cultures unrelated to each other.

JC: Well to such an extent that it’s stunning. And after years and years and years of reading these things I’m still overwhelmed by the similarities in cultures that are far, far apart. There are two explanations of this: one explanation is that the human psyche is essentially the same all over the world – it is the inward aspect of the human body which is essentially the same all over the world – with the same organs – with the same instincts – with the same impulse systems – with the same conflicts – the same fears. There is also the counter theory of diffusion – now for instance when agriculture is first developed let’s say in the near east or in southeast Asia – these are the two big centers in the old world – then the arts of tilling the soil goes forth from this area andalong with it goes a mythology that has to do with fertilizing the earth and bringing up the plants – killing the body -- cutting it up -- burying it and having the plant come –that myth will go with the agricultural tradition – you won’t find it in a hunting culture tradition.

So there are historical as well as psychological aspects to this problem.

BM: In all of these stories there is a hero dying in order for life to appear again – what does that say to you?

New Guinea ritual

JC: Let me tell you one story here. This isn’t a story – this is a ritual. It’s in New Guinea and it’s associated with the men’s societies in New Guinea and they are horror societies because they really enact the myth of death and resurrection and cannibalistic consumption. And you have the myth there of the buried body and the life coming it out of it – this is the basic myth. Now we’re going to enact it. So here’s this sacred field – the drums going and chants going and then pauses – and this went on for 3 or 4 or 5 days – on and on – rituals are boring but they just wear you out and then you break through to something else.

6-of-15


JC: Then comes the great moment. The young boys who were being initiated into manhood were now to have their first sexual experience. There was a great shed of enormous logs supported by two uprights and the young woman comes in all ornamented as a deity – and she is brought to lie down in this place beneath the great roof and the boys then with the drums going and chanting going on – one after another – there are about 6 boys have their first permitted or public intercourse with the girl and when the last boy is with her in full embrace the supports are withdrawn – the logs drop and the couple are killed – there is the union of male and female again as they were in the beginning before the separation took place -- there is the union of begetting and death again – and they’re both the same thing – the little pair are pulled out and roasted and eaten right that evening – enacting the myth in its essential character. You can’t beat that.

The sacrifice of the mass

JC: That’s the sacrifice of the mass. One of the wonderful things in the Catholic ritual is going to communion. There you’re taught that this IS the body and blood of the savior and you take it to you and you turn inward and there he’s working within you.

BM: The truth to which the ritual points is?

JC: The nature of life itself has to be realized in the acts of life. When in the hunting cultures a sacrifice is made -- it is as it were a gift -- a bribe -- as it were -- to the deity that is being invited to do something for us or to give us something. When a figure is sacrificed in the planting culture that figure is the god – the person who died – was buried – and became the food is Christ crucified – from whose body the food of the spirit comes. There is a sublimation of what originally was a very solid vegetal image.

The two trees in the Garden

JC: He is on holy rood – the tree – he is himself the fruit of the tree. Jesus is the fruit of eternal life which was on the second tree in the Garden of Eden. When man had eaten of the fruit of the first tree – the tree of the knowledge of good and evil -- he was said to have been expelled from the garden – he had already expelled himself from the garden – the garden is the place of unity – non-duality -- non-duality of male and female, non-duality of man and god, non-duality of good and evil, you eat the duality and you’re on the way out. So this tree of the non-duality is the tree of the exit – the tree of coming back into the garden is the tree of immortal life – where you know that I and the father are one. And the two seem to become one again.

And this is exactly the tree under which the Buddha sits – the tree of immortal life – of the knowledge of immortal life. And the Buddha under his tree and Christ hanging on his tree are the same image – they are the same image – the one who has died to the flesh and been reborn in the spirit.

7-of-15


JC: This is an essential experience of any mystical realization. You die to your flesh and are born to your spirit. You identify yourself with the consciousness and life of which your body is but the vehicle. You die to the vehicle and become identified in your consciousness with that of which the vehicle is the carrier – do you understand me?

And that is the god. So that what you get in the vegetation traditions is this notion of identity behind the surface display of duality. Identity behind it all. All of these are manifestations of the one. The one radiance shines through all things.

The function of art in a way is to reveal through the object here the radiance. And that’s what you get when you see the beautiful organization of a fortunately composed work of art -- you just say “Aha!” Somehow it speaks to the order in you own life. This is a realization through art of the very thing that the religions are concerned to render.

BM: That death is life and life is death? And that the two are in accord?

JC: You have to have a balance between death and life. They are two aspects of the same thing – which is Being – Becoming.

BM: And that’s in all of these stories?

JC: All of them. I don’t know one where death is rejected.

The sacrificial ballgame of the Mayan

BM: This idea of sacrifice is so foreign to our world today.

JC: Well, the old idea of being sacrificed is not what we think at all. Just consider, I think the great model of sacrifice is the Mayan Indian ballgame – you know they had a kind of basketball game – there was a loop there up in the stadium wall and the idea was to get this big heavy ball through that – I don’t know how they did it – with their shoulders or heads or something or other and the captain of the winning team was sacrificed on the field by the captain of the losing team – his head was cutoff. And going to your sacrifice as the winning stroke of your life is the essence of the early sacrificial idea.

The Iroquois sacrifice

JC: There’s a wonderful story that I found in the Jesuit Relations – you know the Jesuits here in the 17th century as missionaries up in Canada and Northern New York state – of a young Iroquois boy who had just been captured by the Hurons . . . and he was being brought to be tortured to death –- the northeast Indians engaged in a systematic torture which would go on for a long time and the ordeal was to be sustained with a smile without flinching that was it that was real manhood – but the boy is brought to this as though he were being brought to his wedding – he is singing – and the people with him are treating him as though they were his hosts and he was the honored guest and he played the game with them knowing where he was going and the priests describing the thing are absolutely bewildered by the situation.

8-of-15


JC: And they say the mockery of this kind of hospitality for people who are then going to become the brutes – NOOO!! Those people were the priests and this was the sacrifice of the alter and that boy was Jesus – you know – by analogy – the priest everyday is celebrating mass which is an imitation or repetition actually of the sacrifice of the cross – that was what this priest was witnessing.

The Jesus dance

JC: But then you have it also in the acts of John – Jesus before going to be crucified –the Jesus dance – that’s one of the most beautiful passages in the Christian tradition.In the Matthew Mark Luke John gospels it certainly mentioned that we sang a hymn and Jesus went forth – well here you have the whole hymn described – in a ring –Jesus in the center saying join hands we’ll sing and dance and he says I am this and I am that and so forth and so forth AMEN AMEN” oh my god it’s grand and then he walks out to be crucified -- when you go to your death that way as a god you are going to your eternal life – what’s sad about that – let’s make it great – and they do.

The lord of death is the lord of sex

BM:The god of death is the lord of the dance.

JC: The god of death is the lord of sex at the same time. It’s a marvelous thing. One after another you can see these gods – Gede, the death god of Haitian Voodoo is also the sex god – Voton had one eye covered and the other uncovered . . . – Osiris the lord of death and the lord of the generation of life – it’s a basic theme – that which dies is born -- you have to have death in order to have life.

The head hunt of Indonesia

JC: Now this is the origin thought of the head hunt. In southeast Asia and particularly in the Indonesian zone. The head hunt right up to now has been a sacred act. It’s a sacred killing. Unless there is death there cannot be birth and a young man before he can be permitted to marry and become a father must have gone forth and had his kill.

BM: What does that say to you?

JC: Well, that every generation has to die in order that the next generation should come. As soon as you beget or give birth to a child you’re the dead one and the child is the new life and you are simply the protector of that new life. Well that’s why there is this deep psychological association of begetting and dieing.

Schopenhauer – the sacrifice of oneself for the other

BM: Isn’t there some relationship between what you’re saying and the fact that a father will give his life for a son – a mother her life for her child?

9-of-15


JC: There’s a wonderful paper – I don’t know whether you knew that I would love to talk to this point – by Schopenhauer – who’s one of my three favorite philosophers –called the Foundation of Morality – there he asks exactly the question you’ve asked -How is it that a human being can so participate in the peril or pain of another – that without thought – spontaneously he sacrifices his own life to the other -- how can this happen – that what we normally think of as the first law of nature – namely self preservation is suddenly dissolved and there is breakthrough. In Hawaii . . . there was an extraordinary adventure that represents this problem . . . there is a place called the poly . . . where people like to got to . . . commit suicide . . . story of police officer jumps out to grab boy right before he jumped . . . and would have gone over if second police officer had not grabbed him and pulled the two of them back . . . and the policeman was asked – why didn’t you let go – you would have lost your life – you see what happened to that man – this is what is called “one-pointed meditation” -- everything else in his life dropped off. His duty to his family -- his duty to his job – his duty to his own career – all of his wishes and hopes for life just disappeared and he was about to go and his answer was “I couldn’t let go -- If I had let that young man go I could not have lived another day of my life.” How come?

Schopenhauer’s answer is: "This is the breakthrough of a metaphysical realization that you and the other ARE ONE. And that the separateness is only an effect of the temporal forms of sensibility of time and space. And our true reality is in that unity with all life. It is a metaphysical truth that becomes spontaneously realized because it’s the real truth of your life. Now you might say the hero is the one who has given his physical life to some order of realization of that truth – it may appear that I am one with my tribe – or I’m one with people of a certain kind -- or I’m one with life.

This is not a concept it is a realization. Do you see what I mean? The concept of love your neighbor and all are to put you in tune with that fact – but whether you love your neighbor or not – bing! -- the thing grabs you and you do this thing – you don’t even know who it is – that policeman didn’t know who that young man was.

Schopenhauer says in small ways you can see is this happening everyday -- all the time – this a theme that can be seen moving life in the world -- people doing nice things for each other.

BM: What do you think has happened to this mythic idea of the hero in our culture today?

10-of-15


JC: It comes up in an experience. I remember during the Vietnam war seeing on television the young men in helicopters going out to rescue one of their companions at great risk to themselves. They didn’t have to rescue that young man. That’s the same thing working. It puts them in touch with the experience of being alive. Goingto the office everyday you don’t get that experience, but suddenly your ripped out into being alive -- and Life is pain -- Life is suffering -- Life is horror – but by god your alive – and it’s spectacular – and this is a case of being alive –rescuing that young man --

BM: But I also know a man who said once after years of standing on the platform of the subway – “I die a little bit down there everyday, but I know I’m doing so for my family.” There are small acts of heroism that occur without regard to the nobility or the notoriety that you attract for it – and the mother does it by the isolation she endures on behalf of the family.

The sacrifice of motherhood

JC: Motherhood is a sacrifice. The little mother bird feeding chicks on veranda in Hawaii story – mother bird plagued by progeny for food – some bigger than her – well this is the symbol of motherhood – giving of your substance – and everything to this progeny.

Marriage – sacrifice to the relationship

JC: This should be it in marriage. A marriage is a relationship. When you make a sacrifice in marriage, you’re not sacrificing to the other – you’re sacrificing to the relationship. And this is symbolized in that Chinese image of the Taiji – the Tao – you know with the dark and the light interacting – it’s a well known sign. That is the relationship of yang and yin: male and female. Which is what a marriage is. And that’s what you are. You are no longer this – you’re the relationship. And marriage I would say is not a love affair – it’s an ordeal. And the ordeal is sacrifice of ego to the relationship – the two-ness – which now becomes the one.

BM: One not only biologically but spiritually – primarily spiritually.

JC: Primarily spiritually.

BM: But the necessary function of marriage to create our own images and perpetuate ourselves in children – but it’s not the primary one – is it?

JC: No – that’s really just the elementary aspect of marriage. There are two completely different stages of marriage. First is the youthful marriage following the wonderful impulse that nature has given us in the interplay of the sexes – biologically and then the reproduction of children – but then there comes a time when the child graduates from the family and the family is left.

11-of-15


JC: I’ve been amazed by the number of my friends who are in their 40’s or 50’s go apart who have had a perfectly decent life together with the child but they interpreted their union in terms of the relationship through the child. They did not interpret it in terms of their own personal relationship to each other.

BM: Utterly incompatible with the idea of doing one’s own thing.

JC: It’s not one’s own thing – you see – it is in a sense one’s own thing – but the one isn’t just you it’s the two together – and that’s a purely mythological image – of the sacrifice of the visible entity for a transcendent unit – cracking eggs to make an omelet. And by finding the right person we reconstruct the image of the incarnate god. And that’s what marriage is.

BM: The right person – how does one choose the right person?

JC: Your heart tells you – it ought to.

BM: Your inner being?

JC: That’s the mystery.

BM: You recognize your other self?

JC: Well I don’t know – but there’s a flash that comes and something in you knows this is the one.

About death

BM: What has mythology told you about death? What do you think about death?

JC: Well, the way – if one can identify with the consciousness of which the body is a vehicle and really achieve an identification with the consciousness of which the body is a vehicle and not knowing what it is – undifferentiated consciousness – one can let the body go. I like what I heard of Woody Allen, “I’m not afraid to die, I just don’t want to be there when it happens.” You can have disengaged yourself from the body and not be there you might say.

BM: And you know from myth and nature that the body dies. It perishes – it rots –we’re back to the beginning . . .

JC: So you expect it. Growing old – I mean you know what’s happening – the body is rotting – it’s dieing, it’s loosing its energy – there’s more mass than energy here. And the identification then with the life a plant survives pruning cutting and even eating –the plant is right back there again is a biological image that is metaphorical of the spiritual mystery.

BM: There’s that wonderful report of the Indians riding into the rain of bullets from Custer’s men – and they’re saying “It’s a good day to die.”

JC: “A great day to die” – They’re not hanging on.

12-of-15


The message of the myth

JC: That’s the message of the myth. You as you know yourself are not thefinal term of your being. And you must die to that one way or another --giving of yourself to something or in being annihilated actually physically -- to return you might say -- or to recognize. Life is always on the edge of death. Always. And one should lack fear and have the courage of life. That’s the principle initiation of all the heroic stories.

BM: What’s the central story?

Sir Gawain & the Green Knight

JC: Sir Gawain & the Green Knight – Arthur’s court is in session – and there rides into the court on a great big green horse a giant knight and the knight says I have a challenge – I have an adventure – I challenge anyone here to come down and take this great big ax and cut my head off and then one year from today meet me at a Green Chapel . . . and I’ll cut his head off. And the only knight who had the courage to accept this curious invitation was Gawain. The knight gets off his horse – sticks out his neck -- Gawain comes down with his ax – and there is the head. And then the knight stands up – picks up the head – gets on the horse rides off and says I’ll see you in a year . . . As the day approaches he finds himself before a little hunter’s cabin and thinks he’ll ask advice here as to where the Green Chapel is – and tells them I have to be there in three days . . . tells story of hunter’s invitation – I’ll give everything I have gotten during the day to you and you give to me what you will have gotten during the day. In the morning the hunter rides off and Gawain is in bed and in comes the hunter’s gorgeous beautiful wife and she tickles Gawain’s chin and invites him to love. Well he’s an Arthurian knight – a knight of Arthur’s court – to betray his host is the last thing a knight can submit to so he resists this woman and she’s very very aggressive and he’s very very stern in his position and finally she says well let me give you a kiss anyhow –so she gives him one big smack and that’s that. In the evening the hunter comes back with a great haul of game – throws it down on the floor and Gawain gives him a kiss . . . second morning similar event – gets two kisses – hunter ½ as much game gets 2 kisses – the third morning wife comes in – now here’s a man about to meet his death –about to have his head dropped off – beautiful woman – and again he resists – she gives him 3 kisses and her garter – this will protect you against any danger. The hunter comes home with one smelly fox – gets three kisses – no garter. So comes the time to go have your head chopped off – do you see what the tests of the knight are here? one is sex – lust and the other is courage . . . . tells him to stretch out a little more – three times – and then the ax comes down and cuts his neck just a little bit – and the green knight says that’s for the garter –

13-of-15


JC: This is the origin legend of the knights of the garter – here is a knight that transcended two great temptations – fear of death and lust for sex and the joys of life – and the moral is that the realization of your bliss – your true being comes when you have put aside the what may be called the passing moment – with its terror – and with its temptations – and its statement of requirements of life – that you should live this way --

Nietzsche – The three Transformations of the spirit

BM: What is that story about the camel and then the lion and along the way you lose the burden of youth?

JC: The three transformations of the spirit – that’s Nietzsche. That’s the prologue to Thus Spake Zarathustra. When you are a child – you are young – a young person –you are a camel – the camel gets down on its knees and says “put a load on me” This is obedience, this is receiving the instruction and information that your society knows you must have in order to live a competent life. When the camel is well loaded – he gets up on his feet – struggles to his feet and runs out into the desert where he becomes transformed into a lion. The heavier the load the more powerful lion. The function of the lion is to kill a dragon and the name of the dragon is “thou shalt” – and on every scale of the dragon there is a thou shalt imprinted. Some of it comes from 2000 years – 4000 years ago some of it comes from yesterday morning’s newspaper headline. When the dragon is killed, the lion is transformed into a child – an innocent child living out of its own dynamic and Nietzsche uses the term [German] “a wheel rolling out of its own center’. That’s what you become. That is the mature individual. The thou shalt is a civilizing force. It turns a human animal into a civilized human being. But then the one who has thrown off the thou shalts is still a civilized human being. He had been humanized by the thou shalt system. So his performance now as a child is not simply childlike at all – he has assimilated the culture and thrown it off as a thou shalt. But this is the way in any artwork. You go to work and study an art – you study the techniques – you study all the rules – and the rules are put upon you by a teacher – then there comes a time of using the rules – not being used by them. You understand what I’m saying?

To follow your bliss

JC: I always tell my students follow your bliss. Your bliss. Where the deep sense of being in form and going where your body and soul want to go. When you have that feeling, then stay with it and don’t let anyone throw you off. Have you ever read Sinclair Lewis’ Babbit? Do you remember the last line? “I’ve never done a thing I wanted to in all my life.” That’s the man who never followed his bliss. Well I heard that line. I was living in Bronxville when I was teaching at Sarah Lawrence before I was married I used to be eating out in the restaurants of the town . . . and Thursday night was the maid’s night off in Bronxville so all the families were out in the restaurants. And one fine evening I was in my favorite restaurant there . . . and at a table was sitting a father, a mother and a scrawny little boy of about 12 years old.

14-of-15


JC: The father says to the boy “Drink your tomato juice” And the boy says “I don’t want to” And the father with a louder voice says “Drink your tomato juice” And the mother says, “Don’t make him do what he doesn’t want to do” And the father looks at her and says “He can’t go through life doing what he wants to do – if he does only what he wants to do – he’ll be dead. Look at me, I’ve never done a thing I wanted to in all my life.” I said my god – Babbit incarnate. And that’s the man who never followed his bliss. Well you may have a success in life, but then just think of it – what kind of life was it – what good is it – you’ve never done a thing you wanted to in all your life.

BM: What happens when you follow your bliss?

JC: You come to bliss. This should be it in marriage. That’s the sense of the marriage ceremony.

The wheel of fortune

JC: In the middle ages a favorite image that occurs in many, many context is the wheel of fortune. There’s the hub of the wheel and there’s the revolving rim of the wheel and if you are attached to the rim of the wheel – let us say fortune – you will be either above – going down – at the bottom – or coming up – but if you are at the hub you’re in the same place all the time. And that’s the sense of the marriage vow – you know –I take you in health or sickness -- you know – wealth or poverty – but I take you – and you are my bliss – not the wealth that you might bring me nor the social prestige – but you – and that’s following your bliss.

Sat Chit Ananda

JC: Now I came to this idea of bliss because in Sanskrit -- which is the great spiritual language of the world -- and they know all about it and have known about it for a long time – the transcendent is transcendent but there are three terms that bring you to the brink – you might say -- the jumping off place to the ocean – and the three terms are: Sat Chit Ananda – and the word sat - means being; chit - means full consciousness; and Ananda - means rapture.

So I thought – I don’t know whether my consciousness is full consciousness or not; I don’t whether my being is proper being or not; but I do know where my rapture is so let me hang on to rapture and that will bring me both being and full consciousness. And it worked!!

BM: What was your rapture?

JC: Well, it started with Indians and then went on to more and more mythological matters and the realm of the arts, music and when I met Jean then the dance came in – and this is it -- just stay with that.

BM: And one doesn’t have to be a poet to do this – carpenters do it.

15-of-15


JC: A poet is simply one who’s made a profession and a lifestyle of being in touch with that. Most people have to be concerned with other things – they get themselves involved in economic and other activities – or you’re drafted into a war that isn’t the one your interested in and how to hold to this umbilical you might say – under those circumstances – that’s a technique each one has to work out for himself somehow.

But most people living in that realm of what might be called occasional concerns, they all have the capacity that’s waiting to be awakened to move to this other place. I know it. I’ve seen it happen in students. Wonderful way of teaching we had at Sara Lawrence where I taught for 38 years I’d have an individual conference with every one of my students at least once a fortnight for an half an hour or so. And there you’re talking on about the things that students ought to be readingand suddenly you hit on something that the student really responds to you can see the eyes open, the complexion changes, a life-possibility has opened there and all you can say to yourself is “I hope this child hangs on to that” – you know. They may or may not. But when they do they’ve found a life right there in the room with you.

BM: How would you advise somebody to tap that spring of eternal life – that joy that is right there?

JC: Well we’re having experiences all the time which may on occasion render some sense of this. A little intuition of where your joy is; grab it. No one can tell you what it’s going to be. You’ve got to learn to recognize your own depths.

BM: Do you ever have the sense when you’re following your bliss as I have at moments of being helped by hidden hands?

JC: All the time. It’s miraculous – I even have a superstition that has grown on me as the result of invisible hands coming all the time – namely that if you do follow your bliss you put yourself on a kind of track that has been there all the while waiting for you -- and the life that you ought to be living is the one you’re living somehow. And you can see it – you begin to deal with people who are in the field of your bliss and they open doors to you. I say follow your bliss and don’t be afraid and doors will open where you didn’t know they were going be.

BM: Do you ever have sympathy for the man who has no invisible means of support?

JC: Yes, he is the one who evokes compassion – you know – that poor chap – and to see him stumbling around when the water of immortal life is right there – evokes ones pity.

BM: Right there? Right there? You believe that? The waters of eternal life? Where?

JC: Yes, right there – wherever you are -- if you’re following your bliss. I mean you’re having that joy – that refreshment – that life – all the time.

1-of-13

Power of MythLove and the Goddess - Program 5

The troubadours

JC: Let’s talk about love. The troubadours of the 12th century -- let’s begin there --because they’re the first ones in the west that really considered love in the sense that we think of it now as a person to person relationship.

It’s the seizure that comes in recognizing your soul’s counterpart in the other person. And that’s what the troubadours stood for and that has become the ideal in our lives today.

Love as Eros

JC: The idea of love as Eros the god who excites you to sexual desire this is not the person to person thing of falling in love in the way the troubadours understood it.

I have a definition for Eros the erotic biological urge as the zeal of the organs for each other and the personal factor doesn’t matter.

Eros is cupid and in India the god of love is Karma . . . big vigorous youth with a bow and quiver of arrows and the names of the arrows are death bringing agony and open up and he drives this thing into you. It’s a total physiological psychological explosion that takes place.

Agape – Christian love

JC: And then the other love -- the Christian love of agape – spiritual love -- love thy neighbor as thyself – again it doesn’t matter who the person is – it’s your neighbor –you must have that kind of love.

But the kind of seizure that comes from the meeting of the eyes as they say in the troubadour tradition -- the purely personal -- person to person thing -- As far as I know it originates as an ideal to be lived for with the troubadours.

BM: You’ve said that what happened in the 12th and 13th centuries was one of the most important mutations of human feeling and spiritual consciousness that a new way of experiencing love came to expression and it was in opposition to that ecclesiastical despotism of the heart which required people – particularly young girls barely out of adolescents -- to marry whomever the church or their parents wanted them to marry –what did this do to the passion of the heart . . .

Traditional marriage

JC: The usual marriage in traditional cultures is arraigned for by the families. It’s not a person to person decision at all and this is true to this day in many parts of the world. This is not to say that in arranged marriages of this kind there is no love – there is a lot of love -- there is family love – and a rich love life on that level so in the middle ages that was the kind of marriage that was sanctified by the church – and so the idea of real person to person marriage was very dangerous it was not only heresy it was adultery and that was punishable by death.

2-of-13


Tristan and Isolde

JC: In the Tristan romance -- that is the crucial romance.

Isolde was engaged to marry King Mark -- they had never seen each other.

And Tristan is sent over to fetch Isolde to Mark and Isolde’s mother prepares a love potion so that the two who are to be married will have real love for each other.

The two youngsters think love potion is wine and drink it and are overtaken with this love.

Brangaine – nurse -- realized what happened – went to Tristan and said you have drunk your death.

Tristan said:

If by my death you mean this agony of love – that is my life.

If by my death you mean the punishment we are to suffer if discovered which is namely execution I accept that.

But If by my death you mean eternal punishment in the fires of hell – in which these people believed -- I accept that too.

That’s big stuff -- This love is bigger even than death – than pain – than anything --this is the affirmation of the pain of life – in a big way . . . any life career you choose in following your bliss should be chosen with that sense – nobody can frighten me off from this thing . . .

There are examples in oriental stories of this kind thing but it did not become a social system -- it has now become the ideal of love in the western world

It is a very mysterious thing that electric thing that happens and then the agony that can follow which is what the troubadours celebrate, the agony of the love, the sickness doctors cannot cure, the wound that can be healed only by the weapon that delivered the wound – the wound is the wound of my passion and agony of love for this creature and the only one who can heal me is the one who delivered the blow. That’s the paradox of the job.

Libido over credo

JC: Credo -- I believe and I believe not only in the laws – but I believe these laws were instituted by god – and there’s no arguing with god – I mean these laws are just a heavy weight on me – disobeying those is sin and it has to with my eternal character.

3-of-13


JC: Libido is the impulse to life -- that comes from the heart – the heart is the organ of opening up to somebody else. That’s the human quality as opposed to the animal qualities which have to do primarily with self interest – opening up to that which is other is the opening of the heart and that’s as the troubadours saw it – it is the opening of the heart.

BM: I can certainly understand why the church was threatened by this because how can you have a church if everyone’s libido is their own god?

JC: Why not? Why can’t the church handle that? If you can sanctify a marriage that has been arraigned, why can’t you sanctify a marriage where two people have joined each other?

BM: So the courage to love became the courage to affirm against tradition whatever knowledge stands confirmed in one’s own experience? Why was that important in the evolution of the West?

JC: Well, it was important in that it gives the West this accent – as I’ve been saying -- on the individual. That he should have faith in his experience and not simply mouth terms that have come to him from other mouths. I think that’s the great thing in the West. The validity of the individual’s experience of what humanity is – what life is – what values are -- against the monolithic system.

The holy grail

BM: Was there some of this in the legend of the holy grail?

JC: Yes. Wolfram has a very interesting statement about the origin of the grail. He says the grail was brought from heaven by the neutral angels – there was the war in heaven between god and Lucifer – and the angelic hosts that sided one group with Lucifer and the other with god – pair of opposites. Good and Evil – god and Satan. The grail was brought down through the middle – the way of the middle -- by the neutral angels. The grail becomes that which is attained and realized by people who have lived their own lives. So the story very briefly is of this . . . the grail king wasa lovely young man but he had not earned that position – and the grail represents the fulfillment of the highest spirit potentialities of the human consciousness –and he was a lovely young man – and he rode forth from his castle with the war cry “amour” and as he’s riding forth a Muslim – a pagan warrior -- a Mohammedan warrior comes out of the woods – a knight – and they both level their lances at each other –and they drive at each other – and the lance of the grail king kills the Mohammedan –but the Mohammedan’s lance castrates the grail king – what that means is that the Christian separation of matter and spirit – of the dynamism of life and the spiritual – natural grace and supernatural grace has really castrated nature –and the European mind – the European life has been -- as it were -- emasculated by this.

4-of-13


JC: The true spirituality which would have come from this has been killed. And then what did the pagan represent? He was a person from the suburbs of Eden – he was regarded as a nature man and on the head of his lance was written the word grail –that is to say nature intends the grail – spiritual life is the bouquet of natural life – not a supernatural thing imposed upon it. And so the impulses of nature are what give authenticity to life – not obeying rules that come from a supernatural authority. That’s the sense of the grail.

The grail becomes symbolic of an authentic life that has lived in terms of its own volition – in terms of its own impulse system which carries it between thepairs of opposites – of good and evil -- light and dark – Wolfram starts his epic with a short poem saying every act has both good and evil results – every act in life yields pairs of opposites in its results – the best we can do is lean toward the light. That is to say – intend the light – and what the light is – is that of the harmonious relationships that come from compassion -- with suffering – understanding of the other person -- this is what the grail is about.

God is love

JC: Well, that’s what it did do – love was a divine visitation and that’s why it was superior to marriage – that was the troubadour idea – if god is love well then love is god – ok . . . love knows no pain.

Satan’s fall

JC: That’s a basic Muslim idea – Iblis – that’s the Muslim name for Satan being god’s greatest lover. Why was Satan thrown into hell? Well the standard story is that when god created the angels he told them to bow to none but himself – then he created man whom he regarded as a higher form than the angels and he asked the angels then to serve man – and Satan would not bow to man. Now this is interpreted in the Christian tradition as I recall from my boyhood instruction – as being the egotism of Satan – he would not bow to man – but in this view – he could not bow to man because of his love for god – he could bow only to god – and then god says – get out of my sight – now the worst of the pains of hell in so far as hell has been described is the absence of the beloved – which is god – so how does Iblis sustain the situation in hell? By the memory of the echo of god’s voice when gods says “go to hell” – I think that is a great sign of love.

JC: Yeah and he is separated from god and that is the real pain of Satan.

5-of-13


Love your enemies

JC: I think the main teaching of Christianity is love your enemies. [Hard to do] I know -- well that’s it -- when peter drew his sword and cut off the servant’s ear . . . and Jesus says put up your sword peter and put the ear back on – Peter has been drawing his sword ever since – and one can speak about Petrine or Christian Christianity in that sense – and I would say the main doctrine of Christianity is the doctrine of Agape – of true love for he who is your enemy.

BM: How does one love one’s enemy without condoning what the enemy does? Accepting his aggression --

JC: Well I tell you how to do that -- Do not pluck the mote from your enemy’s eye –but pluck the beam from your own.

Tibet

JC: I have a friend whom I met by chance – a young Buddhist monk from Tibet – in 1959 the communists crashed down and bombed the palace of the dalai lama –bombarded Lhasa – people murdered and that kind of thing – and he escaped at the time of the dalai lama – and those monasteries of 5000/6000 monks all wiped out –tortured and everything else – I haven’t heard one word of incrimination of the Chinese from the young man – there is absolutely no condemnation of the Chinese here – and you hear this from the dalai lama himself – you will not hear a word of condemnation –this recognition of the way of life – through which that vitality of the spirit is moving in its own way – I mean these men are sufferers of terrific violence – there’s no animosity – I learned religion from them.

BM: Do most of the stories of mythology from whatever culture say that suffering is intrinsically a part of life and there is no way around it.

JC: I think I would be willing to say they do – I can’t think of anything now that says if you’re going to live you won’t suffer – it will tell you how to understand, and bear and interpret suffering – that it will do – and when the Buddha says there is escape from suffering – the escape from sorrow is nirvana –nirvana is a psychological position where you are untouched by desire and fear . . . . your life becomes harmonious, well centered and affirmative of life. [Even with suffering] Exactly. There is a passage in Paul’s epistle to the Philippians’“be as Christ – for Christ did not think godhood something to be hung on to – to be clung to – but let go and came down and took life in the form of a servant – a servant even on to death” – that say come in and accept the suffering and affirm it.

6-of-13


Abelard

BM: So you would agree with Abelard in the 12th century who said Jesus’ death on the cross was not as ransom paid -- as a penalty applied but it was an act of at – one-ment– atonement – at one with the race . . .

JC: That’s the most sophisticated interpretation of why Christ had to be crucified. Abelard’s idea was that – this is connected with the grail king and everything else –that the coming of Christ to be crucified and illustrating thus the suffering of life –removes man’s mind from commitment to the things of this world – in compassion – it’s in compassion with Christ that we turn to Christ and so the injured one becomes the savior. It the suffering that evokes the humanity of the human heart.

BM: So you would agree with Abelard that mankind yearning for god and god yearning for mankind in compassionment at that cross?

JC: And by contemplating the cross you are contemplating the true mystery of life. And that love for this experience – no matter how horrific the experience – the love for it.

BM: So there is joy and pain in love?

JC: Yeah, there is. Love you might say is the burning point of life and since all life is sorrowful – so is love. And the stronger the love the more that pain –but love bears all things – love itself is a pain you might say – that is the pain of being truly alive.

SECOND HALF

The Goddess

BM’s introduction – JC’s quest across Europe for the stories of love and chivalry . . .cathedrals reflected love for Mary – mother of god -- reverence for the power of the female is another grand theme in ancient mythology – in primitive planting cultures women contributed importantly to the economic life of the community by participating in the growing and reaping of crops and as the mother and nourisher of life she was thought to assist the earth symbolically in its fertility – some believe there was a golden age of the goddess until she was driven from the imagination by the emergence of patriarchal authority – of late however, scientists have resurrected the name of an ancient goddess - Gaia – to express the idea of earth as a living body on which we depend for life . . .

7-of-13


The Mother Goddess

BM: The lord’s prayer begins -- our father which art in heaven – could it have begun our mother?

JC: This is a metaphorical image – this is a symbolic image – and to make the point that it’s not your physical father -- we have our father who art in heaven – but heaven again is a symbolic idea – where would heaven be? It is no place. All of the references of religious and mythological images are to planes of consciousness or fields of experience potential in the human spirit and these are to evoke attitudes and experiences that are appropriate to a meditation on the mystery of the source of your own being – I would say – so there have been systems of religion where the mother is the prime parent – the source -- and she’s really a more immediate parent than the father because one is born from the mother and then the first experience of any infant is the mother -- so the image of woman is the image of the world – you might say that mythology is simply a translation of the world into a mother image – we talk of mother earth and so forth.

BM: But what happened along the way to this reverence that in primitive societies was directed toward the goddess figure the great goddess the mother earth?

JC: That comes in primarily with agriculture and the agricultural societies – it has to do with the earth -- the human woman does give birth as the earth gives birth to theplants she gives nourishment as the plants do -- so woman magic and earth magic are the same – they are related – and the personification of this energy that gives birth to forms and nourishes forms is properly female. And so it is in the agricultural world of ancient Mesopotamia -- the Egyptian Nile – but also in the earlier planting culture systems the goddess is the mythic form that is dominant. … When you have a goddess as the creator, it’s her own very body that is the universe -- she is identical with the universe and in Egypt you have the mother heavens – the goddess Newt who’s represented as the whole heavenly sphere . . .

BM: So it would be natural for people trying to explain the wonders of the universe to look to the female figure as the explanation for what they saw in their own lives.

JC: Not only that – but then when you move to a philosophical point of view the female represents in Kantian terminology – the forms of sensibility – the female represents time and space itself – she is time and space and the mystery beyond her is beyond pairs of opposites – so it isn’t male and it isn’t female –it neither is nor isn’t – but everything is within her so the gods are her children –everything you can think of – everything you can see is the production of the goddess.

8-of-13


A Vedic story

JC: This is a wonderful story – the Vedic gods are together and they see a strange sort of amorphous thing down the way like a kind of smoky fog – story of who are you –voice says who are you – I can burn anything – piece of straw he can’t burn it – lord of wind – -- he can’t blow that -- then a beautiful mysterious woman arrives – mystic woman – and she instructs the gods and tells them who that is – that is the ultimate mystery of being from which you boys have received your strength and he can turn it on or off for you – and she comes as the one who illuminates the gods themselves – concerning the ultimate ground of their own being – it’s the female as the giver of forms – she is the one who gave the forms and she knows where they came from.

Our mother

BM: I wonder what it would have meant to us if we had started the prayer our mother instead of our father – what psychological difference would it have made?

JC: Well it makes a psychological difference in the character of the cultures. You have the basic birth of civilization in the near east with the great river valleys then as the main source areas – the Nile – the Tigris/Euphrates and then over in India the Indus Valley and later the Ganges this is the world goddess – all these rivers have goddess names finally – then there come the invasions – these fighting people are herding people – the Semites are herders of goats and sheep and the Indo/Europeans of cattle – they were formerly the hunters – they translate a hunting mythology into a herding mythology – but it’s animal oriented and when you have hunters you have killers and when you have herders you have killers because they’re always in movement no matter -- coming into conflict with other people and they have to conquer the area they move into.

Warrior gods

JC: This comes into the near east and brings in the warrior gods like Zeus and Yahweh.

BM: The sword and death instead of fertility.

JC: Right -- Particularly the Hebrews – they really wipe out the goddess. The term for the goddess – the Canaanite goddess that’s used in the Old Testament is the abomination – and there was a very strong accent against the goddess in the Hebrew which you do not find in the Indo/European – there you have Zeus marrying the goddess – and then the two play together – I think it’s an extreme case that we have in the bible and our own Western subjugation of the female is really – I think -- a function of biblical thinking.

BM: Because when you substitute the male for the female you get a different psychology – a different cultural bias.

9-of-13


JC: Particularly if you cut the female out and don’t have any – if the male is on top like this and the female is the subordinate all the way you have a totally different system from that when the two are facing each other.

BM: And it’s permissible in your culture to do what your gods do so …

JC: Well that’s exactly it. So I would see three situations here: 1) the early one of the sheer goddess when the male is hardly a significant divinity – she is the total thing; 2) then this other one of the Hebrew of the male is the total thing – in fact he takes over her role 3) and finally then the classical one where the two are in interaction.

BM: There are women today who say the spirit of the goddess has been in exile for 5000 years . . .

JC: You can’t put it that far back -- 5000 years -- she was a very potent figure in Hellenistic times in the Mediterranean.

The Virgin Mother

JC: And she came back with the virgin in the Roman Catholic tradition – you don’t have a tradition with the goddess celebrated any more beautifully and marvelously than in the 12th and 13th century French cathedrals – everyone of which is called Notre Dame.

BM: What about the virgin birth – suddenly the goddess reappears in the form of the chaste & pure vessel chosen for god’s action.

JC: Well, in the history of Western religions this is an extremely interesting development. The virgin birth comes in by way of the Greek tradition – when you read your 4 gospels – the only one with the virgin birth in it is the gospel according to Luke – and Luke was a Greek.

BM: And there was in the Greek tradition images, legends, myths of virgin births?

JC: All of them – Lida and the Swan – Persephone and the serpent – and this one and that one and the other one -- the virgin birth is represented throughout.

BM: This was not a new idea in Bethlehem.

JC: No – what is the meaning of the virgin birth?

10-of-13


Kundalini

JC: In India there is this system of the Kundalini – the idea of the centers – the psychological centers up the spine and they represent the psychological planes of concern and consciousness and action. The first is at the rectum and this is that of alimentation the serpent represents this - the traveling esophagus – just eating and eating and eating – eating -- and all of us -- we wouldn’t be here if we weren’t eating. And then the second center is the sex organ center and that’s the urge to procreation –the third center is at the navel and this is where you eat and want to consume -- it’s not the alimentary eating it is the mastering and smashing and trashing of others – do you see?

JC: this is the aggressive mode – now the first is an animal instinct – the second is an animal instinct, the third is an animal instinct – and these three centers are located in the pelvic basin.

The next one is at the level of the heart and this is the opening of compassion and there you move out of the field of animal action into a field that is properly human and spiritual. Now in each of these centers there is a symbolic form. At the base -- the first one -- there is the form of the lignum and unie – the male and female organs in conjunction. At the heart chakra there is again the male and female organs in conjunction, but in gold -- this is the virgin birth – it’s the birth of spiritual man out of the animal man [and it happens] when you are awakened at the level of the heart to compassion and suffering with the other person – that’s the beginning of humanity and the mediations of religion properly are on that level – the heart level --

BM: You say it’s the beginning of humanity, but in these stories that’s the moment when gods are born – the virgin birth – it’s a god who emerges from that chemistry.

JC: And you know who that god is? It’s you. All of these symbols in mythology refer to you – you can get stuck out there and think it’s all out there -- and so you’re thinking of Jesus and all the sentiments about how he suffered – what that suffering is. is what should be going on in you -- have you been reborn? have you died to your animal nature and come to life as a human incarnation?

BM: Why is it significant that this is of a virgin?

JC: It is that the begetter is the spirit – it is a spiritual birth – the virgin conceived of the word through the ear –

BM: the word came like a shaft of light --

JC: Yes – now the Buddha was born from his mother’s side at the level of the heart chakra – that is a symbolic birth – he wasn’t born from his mother’s side – but symbolically he was.

11-of-13


BM: But the Christ came the way you and I come.

JC: Yes – but of a virgin – and then according to Roman Catholic doctrine her virginity was restored – so nothing happened physically you might say – it’s not a physical birth --

It’s symbolic of a spiritual transformation – that’s what the virgin births are about – and so deities are born that way who represent beings who act in terms of compassion and not in terms of the lower three centers.

BM: If you go back into antiquity do you find images of the Madonna as the mother of the savior child?

Isis and Osiris

JC: Well what you have as the model for the Madonna actually is Isis with her child Horace at her breast – this was the actual model for the Madonna symbol – this is a prime myth in this period of the goddess as the redeemer-- the one who goes in quest of the lost spouse or lover and through her loyalty and descent into the realm of death recovers him. Isis and Osiris twins – tells story – death of god and resurrection. Isis goes on quest for husband thrown in Nile. Takes job as nurse -- gives child immortality.

Conceives of her dead spouse – this is an image that occurs in Egyptian art all the time – out of death comes life and all of this kind of business -- and gives birth to her child Horace with dead Osiris beside her – this is the motif for the Madonna – it becomes the Madonna -- and in Egyptian symbology Isis represents the throne – the pharaoh sits on the throne of Isis as child sits on mother’s lap.

Madonna and child

JC: And when you look at west portal of Chartres Cathedral you will see the Madonna as the throne with the little child Jesus as the world emperor on her lap -- that is the same image that has come over . . . . [the Christian father took this image] definitely –and they really say so – you read the second letter of peter and he says those forms which were merely mythological forms in the past are now incarnate and actual in our savior – there was a mythology of the savior – the dead and resurrected god – and it’s associated with the moon which dies and is resurrected every month – and you have three nights dark and you have Christ three days in the tomb – and this kind of thing – it’s an intentional saying – that which was merely talked about is now fact – no one knows what date of Christmas ought to be – but it’s put on the date of the winter solstice – when the nights begin to be shorter and the days longer – the birth of light – so there is a idea of death to the past and birth to the future in our lives and in our thinking all the time.

12-of-13


JC: Death to the animal nature – birth to the spiritual and these symbols are talking about it one way or another. And the goddess is the one who brings it about – the second birth is through the second mother -- Notre Dame du Paris . . . our mother church – we are reborn by entering and leaving a church – [and it doesn’t mean physically] – it means spiritually-- [that there is a power unique to the feminine principle] . . . . it’s not necessarily unique to her – you can have rebirth through the male also – but using this system of symbols the woman becomes the regenerator.

BM: Wonderful saying in new testament of Jesus “in Jesus there is no male or female” in the ultimate sense of things there is neither . . .

JC: There would have to be -- if Jesus represents the source of our being – we are all as it were thoughts in the mind of Jesus -- he is the word that has become flesh in us too.

BM: You and I would possess characteristics that are both male and female.

Male and female – yin and yang

JC: Well actually the body does but sometime in the fetal period it becomes apparent that this is going to be male and this female – meanwhile it’s a kind of neutral body with the potentialities for either inflection . . . And in that yin yang figure from China in the dark fish there’s a light spot and in the light one there’s a dark spot – that’s how they can relate – you couldn’t relate at all to something of which you did not participate – into which you did not participate at all –that’s why the idea of god as the absolute other is a ridiculous idea– there could be no relationship to that which is absolute other.

BM: The question arises discussing the male/female principle – the virgin birth – the spiritual power that gives us the second birth – the wise people of all time have said we can live the good life if we learn in fact to live spiritually – but how does one learn to live spiritually when one is of the flesh – remember Paul said the desires of the flesh are against the spirit and the desires of the spirit are against the flesh?

JC: Well, in ancient times and primitive times, that was the business of the teacher he was to give you the clues to a spiritual life – that was what the priest was for -- also that was what the ritual was for – a ritual can be defined as an enactment of a myth – by participating in a good sound ritual you are actually experiencing a mythological life – and it’s out of that, that one can learn to live spiritually -- [these stories of mythology actually point the way to the spiritual life] yes -- you’ve got to have a clue – you’ve got to have a road map of some kind and these are all around us – they’re here.

13-of-13


BM: And the road map to which the goddess stories are pointing is the map of elevating the spiritual to an equality with the physical so you live in union with those two.

JC: Yes, there you come to the real sanctity of the earth itself because that is the body of the goddess – when Yahweh creates – he creates the earth and breathes his life into it – he’s not there – she’s there -- your body is her body – and there’s that kind of identity.

BM: That’s why I’m not so sure the future of the race and the salvation of the journey is in space – I think it is right here on earth – in the body – in the womb of all of our being..

JC: Well it certainly is – when you go out into space what you’re carrying is your body and if that hasn’t been transformed – space won’t transform it for you -- but thinking about space may help you to realize something.

The inner reaches of outer space

[In your book -- Inner Reaches of Outer Space -- describing page out of National Geographic Atlas of the Word]

JC: What these pages opened to me was the vision of a universe of unimaginable magnitude and inconceivable violence – billions upon billions literally of roaring thermonuclear furnaces scattering from each other – each thermonuclear furnace being a star and our sun among them – many of them actually blowing themselves to pieces littering the outermost reaches of space with dust and gas out of which new stars with circling planets are being born right now -- and then from still more remote distances beyond all these there come murmurs microwaves which are echoes of the greatest cataclysmic explosion of all – namely the big bang of creation -- which according to recent reckonings must have occurred some 18 billion years ago --

That’s where we are kiddo – and to realize that you realize how really important you are – one little microbit in this great magnitude and then out of that must come the experience that you and that are in some sense one –and you partake of all of that.

It begins here.

1-of-14

Power of MythMasks of Eternity - Program 6

JC: We want to think about god -- god is a thought -- god is an idea -- but its reference is to something that transcends all thinking – I mean he’s beyond being --beyond the category of being and non-being. Is he or is he not? Neither is nor is not.

Every god, every mythology, every religion is true in this sense -- it is true as metaphorical of the human and cosmic mystery.

He who thinks he knows doesn't know; he who knows that he doesn't know -- knows.

There is an old story that is still good; the story of the quest – the spiritual quest. That is to say to find the inward thing which you basically are.

All of these symbols in mythology refer to you; have you been reborn; have you died to your animal nature and come to life as a human incarnation.

You are god in your deepest identity. You are one with the transcendent.

BM: The images of god are many -- Joseph Campbell called them the masks of eternity – and said they both cover and reveal the face of glory.

All our names and images for god are masks, Campbell said. They signify that ultimate reality which by definition transcends language and art.

A myth is a mask of god too, a metaphor for what lies behind the visible world.

As teacher, scholar, and writer Joseph Campbell spent his life in the study of comparative religion. He wanted to know what it means that god assumes such different masks in different cultures . . .

We go east of Suez . . .

Campbell, who became President of the American Society for the Study of Religion, was at home in the sacred scriptures of all the world’s great faiths.

He found comparable stories in them; stories of creation, of virgin births, incarnations, death and resurrection, second comings, judgment days.

Quoting one of his favorite Hindu scriptures which he translated from the Sanskrit he concluded: Truth is one, the sages speak of it by many names . . . .

2-of-14


Participation in divinity

BM: Is there something in common in every culture that creates this need for god?

JC: Well, I think anyone who has an experience of mystery at all knows that there is a dimension let’s say -- of the universe that is not that which is available to his senses.

There’s a wonderful saying in one of the Upanishads – When for a sunset or a mountain – and the beauty of this or of that – you pause and say “Ah!” -- that is participation in divinity – and I think that’s what it is – it’s the realization of wonder and also the experience of tremendous power, which people of course living in the world of nature are experiencing all the time. You know there’s something there that’s much bigger than the human dimension.

And our way of thinking in the West largely is that God is the source of the energy.

The way in most oriental thinking and I think in most what we call primitive thinking also is that god is a manifestation of the energy – not its source – that god is the vehicle of the energy -- and the level of energy that is involved or represented determines the character of the god; there are gods of violence, there are gods of compassion; there are gods that unite the two; there are gods that are the protectors of kings in their war campaigns.

These are personifications of the energy that’s in play.

And what the source of the energy is – what’s the source of the energy in these lights around us – I mean this is a total mystery.

BM: Doesn’t this make of faith an anarchy – a sort of continuing war among principalities?

JC: As life is, yes. Even in your mind when it comes to do anything there will be a war -- a decision as to priorities.

What you’re to do now.

Or in relationship to other people there will be four or five possibilities for my way of action. And the notion of divinity – or divine life - in my mind would be what would determine my decision; if it were rather crude, it would be a rather crude decision.

BM: Is divinity just what we think?

JC: Yes.

BM: What does that do to faith?

JC: Well, that’s a tough one about faith.

BM: You are a man of faith. You’re a man of wonder.

3-of-14


The experience of being alive

JC: I’m not. I don’t have to have faith -- I have experience – well I have experience of the wonder of the life – I have the experience of love – I have experience of hatred and malice -- I’d like to punch the guy’s jaw -- and I admit this -- but those are different divinities from the point of view of a symbolic imaging – those are different images operating in me – for instance when I was a little boy and was being brought up Roman Catholic – I was told I had a guardian angel on my right side and a tempting devil on my left – and when it came to making a decision of what I would do – the decision would depend on which one had most influence on me.

And I must say that in my boyhood and I think also in the people who were teaching me they actually concretized those thoughts – it was an angel – that angel is a fact –and the devil is a fact. Do you see?

Otherwise one thinks of them as metaphors for the energies that are afflicting and guiding you.

[And those energies come] from your own life – the energy of your own body – your different organs in your body, including your head – are the conflict systems.

BM: And your life comes from where?

JC: There you are -- from the ultimate energy that’s the life of the universe. And then you say – well someone has to generate that – why do you have to say that? Why can’t it be impersonal? – that would be Brahman – that would be the transcendent mystery that you can also personify.

BM: Can men and women live with an impersonality?

JC: Yes, they do all over the place – just go east of Suez.

In the East the gods are elemental

JC: In the East, the gods are much more elemental – elemental -- less human and more like the powers of nature.

I see a deity as representing an energy system – and part of the energy system is the human energy systems of love and malice, hate, benevolence, compassion.

And in oriental thinking -- the god is the vehicle of the energy – not its source.

And the basic Buddhist idea is that that is true of you as well.

And what Jesus was – was a person who realized that in himself and lived out of the Christhood of his nature.

BM: What do you think about Jesus?

4-of-14


About Jesus

JC: We just don’t know Jesus – all we know are four contradictory texts that tell us what he did. [Written many years after he lived] I think we know what Jesus said – I think the sayings of Jesus are probably pretty close. But when you read the Thomas Gospel – the Gospel according to Thomas -- which was dug up there with those other Gnostic texts – it has all the flavor of one of the synoptics – Matthew, Mark or Luke –except that it doesn’t say quite the same thing – there’s one wonderful passage – it’s the last one in the Gospel – When will the kingdom come? – now in Mark 13 – I think it is – we hear that the end of the world is going to come – that is to say a mythological image – that’s the end of the world -- is taken as a reference to an actual physical historical fact. To be.

[Rephrased:The end of the world is going to come (Mark 13) -- a mythological image of the end of the world is taken as a reference to an actual physical historical fact to be.]

When you read the Thomas Gospel – Jesus says the kingdom of the father will not come by expectation – the kingdom of the father is spread upon the earth and men do not see it.

So I look at you now -- in that sense and the radiance of the presence of the divine isknown to me -- through you. Through you – sure. Jesus also says in this text – he who drinks from my mouth will become as I am and I shall be he. He’s talking from the point of view of that being of beings which we call the Christ – who is the being of all of us -- and anyone who lives in relation to that is as Christ. And anyone who incarnates – or rather brings into his life the message of the word is equivalent to Jesus – that’s the sense there.

You are and I am speaking this seriously.

So you are the vehicle -- you are as it were radiant of the spirit. And that’s -- why not recognize it.

I believe in what?

Do you believe in a personal God?

BM: Is there a god?

JC: I had a very amusing experience that it might be worth telling – I was in the NY Athletic Club -- Story about meeting priest … I’m a professor – he’s a professor at one of our catholic universities . . . priest asks are u a priest – no father – are you a catholic – I was father and now he asked – “Do you believe in a personal god?” I said no father and he said “Well, I suppose there is no way to prove by logic the existence of a personal god” – and I said “if there were father – what would be the value of faith”. . . “well Mr. Campbell it was nice to have met you” and he was off – “I really felt like I had done a jujitsu trick . . .”

5-of-14


JC: But, that was a very illuminating conversation to me. The fact that he asked “Do you believe in a personal god – that meant that he also recognized the possibility of the Brahman – of the transcendent energy.

What is religion

JC: What is religion? The word religion means religio – linking back –linking back the phenomenal person to a source – it is the one life in both of us – then my separate life has been linked to the one life – religio –linked back and this becomes symbolized in the images of religion which represent that connecting link . . .

Jung – the circle

BM: . . . Jung said the most powerful religious symbol is the circle – the circle is one of the great primordial images of mankind – in considering the symbol of the circle we are analyzing the self . . .

JC: It is an ever present thing – it’s the center from which you’ve come -- back to which you go.

. . . Indian Book by Natalie Curtis . . . circle . . . and then you read in Plato somewhere the soul is a circle . . .

The circle represents a totality – within the circle is one thing – it is encircled – it’s enframed -- that would be the spatial aspect, but the temporal aspect of the circle is you leave – go somewhere -- and come back – the alpha and omega – God is the alpha and omega -- the source and the end.

Somehow the circle suggests immediately a completed totality whether in time or in space.

. . . The circle is universally symbolic because it’s experienced all the time –experienced in the day and the year . . . and experienced in leaving home – going on your adventure . . . and coming back to home – then there’s a deeper one -- the mystery of the womb and the tomb . . . when people are buried it’s for rebirth –that’s the origin of the burial idea – you put back into the womb of mother earth for rebirth . . .

Jung used it as a pedagogical device – what he called the Mandala – this was actually a Hindu term for a sacred circle . . . you have the deity -- the center – with the power source – the illumination source – and these are the manifestations or aspects of its radiance.

6-of-14


JC: But in working out a mandala for oneself . . . draw a circle and then think of the different impulse systems in your life – the different value systems in your life -- and try then to compose them – find where the center is – it’s a kind of discipline for pulling all those scattered aspects of your life together – finding a center and ordering yourself to it so you’re trying to coordinate your circle with the universal circle -- to be at the center.

The pollen path of the Navajo

JC: The Navajo have that wonderful image of what they call “the pollen path” – and when you realize what pollen is – it’s the life source -- and it’s a single path – the center – and then they would say -- beauty before me – beauty behind me – beauty to the right of me – beauty to the left of me – beauty above me – beauty below me --I’m on the Pollen path.

The little cosmos of one’s own life and the macrocosm of the world’s life are in some way to be coordinated.

Well for instance among the Navajo Indians -- healing ceremonies were conducted by way of sand paintings which are mostly mandalas on the ground and then the person who is to be treated moves into the mandala – there will be a mythological context that he will be identifying with and he identifies himself with that power.

And this idea of sand painting with mandalas and used for meditation purposes –appears also in Tibet.

Tibetan sand mandala

JC: In the great Tantric monasteries outside of Lhasa for instance – Gupta – they practiced sand painting – cosmic images and so forth indicating the forces of the spiritual powers that operate in our lives.

BM: What do you make of that – in two very different cultures (Sandpainting --Navaho Indians and Tibetan monks) the same imagery emerges –

JC: Yes. Well, there are only two ways to explain it – and one is by diffusion – that an influence came from there to here -- and the other is by separate development – and when you have the idea of separate development -- this speaks for certain powers in the psyche which are common to all mankind – otherwise you couldn’t have – and to the detail the correspondences can be identified – it’s astonishing – when one studies these things in depth -- the degree to which the agreements go between totally separated cultures.

BM: Which says something about the commonality of the species.

7-of-14


Archetypes of the unconscious

JC: Well, yes. That was Carl Jung’s idea which he calls the archetypes -- archetypes of the collective unconscious. An archetype is a constant form – a basic fundamental form which appears in the works of that person over there and this person over here –without connection. And they are expressions of the structure of the human psyche.

BM: So if you find in a variety of cultures each one telling the story of creation or the story of a virgin birth or the story of a savior who comes and dies and is resurrected –you’re saying something about what is inside us and the need to understand.

JC: One can say that the images of myth are reflections of spiritual and depth potentialities of every one of us - through contemplating those we evoke those powers in our own lives -- to operate through ourselves.

Elementary ideas

JC: There was a very important anthropologist – he’s the one with whom my works begin – my studies -- Bastion in Germany end of the last century and first part of this –he was a world traveler and recognized very soon that there were certain motifs that appeared in all of the religions and all of the mythologies of the world – such an idea for example as a spiritual power – that’s an archetypal image that appears everywhere – and he called these elementary ideas -- but they appear in very different forms in different provinces and at different times and those different forms or costumes he called ethnic or folk ideas – but within the ethnic idea is the elementary idea.

And it is those elementary ideas that Carl Jung then began studying and called archetypes of the unconscious. When you say elementary idea they seem to come from up here (the head) – when you say archetypes of the unconscious they come from here (the gut) and they appear in our dreams as well as in the myths.

BM: So when one scripture talks about being made in His image – in god’s image – it’s being created with certain qualities that every human being possesses – no matter what that person’s religion or culture or geography or heritage –

JC: God would be the ultimate elementary idea of man – and we are all made in the image of god – okay -- so that is the ultimate elementary idea or archetype of man.

This is why clowns are good in religions because they show that the image is not a fact – but it’s a reflex of some kind.

The Trickster

JC: Some of the best trickster stories are associated with our American Indian tales. Now these figures are clown-like figures and yet they are the creator gods at the same time very often. And this makes the point – I am not the ultimate image – I am transparent to something – through me – through my funny form – I’m mocking it –and turning it into a grotesque action – if I had been a big sober presence you would get stuck with the image.

8-of-14


BM: There is a wonderful story in some African traditions of the god walking down the road with two colored hat . . .

JC: He even makes it worse by first walking in this direction and then turning around turning his hat around . . .

“Spreading strife is my greatest joy.”

No matter what system of thought you have it can't possibly include boundless life and when you think everything is just that way – POW!! - trickster comes in and it all blows and you get the becoming thing again.

Now Jung has a wonderful saying somewhere – “religion is a defense against a religious experience” – that means it has reduced the whole thing to concepts and ideas. And having the concept and idea short-circuits the transcendent experience. The experience of deep mystery is what one has to regard as the ultimate religious experience.

The image of god is your basic obstruction

JC: You have to go past the image of Jesus. The image of god becomes the final obstruction – your god is your ultimate barrier.

This is basic Hinduism – basic Buddhism – the idea of the ascent of the spirit through the centers -- the charkas as they’re called – or lotuses – the different centers of experience – the animal experiences of hunger and greed or just the zeal of reproduction or the physical mastery of one kind or another – these are all stages of power – but then when the center of the heart is reached and the sense of compassion on another person -- mercy and participation -- and I and you are in some sense of the same being – this is what marriage is based on – there’s a whole new stage of life experience opens up with the opening of the heart – and this is what’s called the virgin birth – the birth of a spiritual life in what formerly was simply a human animal -- living for the animal aims of health, progeny, wealth, and a little fun -- but now you come to something else to participate in this sense of accord with another or accord with some principle that has lodged in your mind as a good to be identified with. Then a whole new life comes and this is in oriental thinking -- the awakening of the religious experience. And then this can go on even to the quest for the experience of the ultimate mystery. This ultimate mystery can be experienced in two senses – without form and another with form – and in this oriental thinking you experience god with form here (in your head) this is heaven –that’s the identification with your own being – because that which god refers to is the ultimate mystery of being which is the mystery of your being as well as of the world’s -- so this is it.

9-of-14


Maslow – peak experience

JC: [Peak experience vs Epiphanies] They’re not quite the same. The peak experience refers to actual moments of your life when you feel this has told you something –something has come through in your experience of your relationship to the harmony of being – it can come – my peak experiences -- the ones I knew were peak experiences after I had them all came in athletics … I ran a couple of races that were just beautiful and the whole race I knew I was going to win and there was no reason for me to know I was going to win because I was touched off anchor in a relay with the first man 30 yrds ahead of me and I just knew – knew it was a peak experience – nobody could beat me today --

that’s a kind of being in full form and really doing it – I don’t think I’ve ever done anything in my life as competently as I ran those two races and those consequently were the experience of really being at my full and doing a perfect job – I don’t think I ever came up to anything quite that way.

There are other kinds of peak experiences that I know are superior to those – but when I read Maslow – and read the peak experience -- I know those were peak experiences.

Joyce – epiphanies

JC: Now that’s another thing – this has to do with the aesthetic experience.

Joyce’s formula for the aesthetic experience is that it does not move you to want to possess the object – that he calls pornography – nor does it move you to criticize and reject the object – that he calls didactic -- social criticism in art.

It is the holding the object – he says you put a frame around it and see it as one thing – and then seeing it as one thing -- you become aware of the relationship -- of part to part and part to the whole -- and the whole to the parts – this is the essential aesthetic factor – rhythm – the rhythm -- the rhythmic relationships – and when a fortunate rhythm has been struck by the artist there is a radiance – that’s the epiphany – and that is what would be the Christ coming through – do you understand what I’m saying -- and it doesn’t matter who it is -- you could take someone who you would think of as being a monster that is an ethical judgment on the life -- and this is transcendent of ethics - no didactics.

The sublime

JC: There’s another emotion associated with art which is not of the beautiful but of the sublime. And what we call monsters can be seen as sublime. They represent powers too great for the mere forms of life to survive. Prodigious expanse of space is sublime. This is the thing that the Buddhists know how to achieve in their temples. Particularly when I was in Kyoto … visiting some of the temple gardens – they are so designed that you’re experiencing something here and then you break past the screen and a whole new horizon opens out.

10-of-14


JC: And somehow with the diminishment of your own ego – the consciousness expands -- this is the experience of sublime. Another experience of the sublime is not of tremendous space but of tremendous energy and power. I have known a couple of people who were in Central Europe during the saturation bombings that were conducted over those cities – and you just have the experience of the sublime there.

And so the monster comes through there – by a monster I mean someone who breaks all of your standards for harmony and for ethical conduct – the God of the end of the world - Vishnu at the end of world is a monster – I mean good night – he’s destroying the world first with fire – and then with a torrential flood that drowns out the fire and everything else and nothing is left but ash – the whole universe has been wiped out –that’s god –

BM: The Christian Millennialists talk of the rapture . . .

JC: Well read Chapter 13 in Mark – that’s the end of the world – you see these are experiences that go past ethical judgment – the ethics is wiped out – our religions with the accent on the human … also stress the ethical – god is good -- god is horrific – the end of the world – there’s an Arab saying I read somewhere in the Arabian Nights – of the angel of death – when the angel of death comes it is terrible -- when he has reached you -- it is bliss.

The Buddhas – peaceful and wrathful

JC: Now in the Buddhist systems, particularly as we get them from Tibet – the Buddhas appear in two aspects – there is the peaceful aspect and there is the wrathful aspect of the deity. Now if you’re clinging to your ego and its little world and hanging on and the deity wants to open you -- the wrathful aspect comes -- it seems to you terrible, but if you are open and open enough -- then that same deity would be experienced as bliss.

This is what is known in Sanskrit as “vive gape” -- discrimination.

The experience of the eternal

JC: There is a Buddha figure called Manjusri – who’s shown with a flaming sword over his head – and what is the sword for – it’s to distinguish the merely temporal from the eternal. It’s the sword that distinguishes that which is enduring from that which is merely passing. The tick, tick, tick of time shuts out eternity. And we live in the field of time. But what is living in the field of time is an eternal principle that’s inflected this way – Brahman – we call it god but that personifies it. You see.

BM: It is the experience of eternity.

JC: Yes, as what you are. I would say.

BM: That whatever eternity is – is here right now.

11-of-14


JC: And nowhere else. Or everywhere else. If you don’t experience it now, you’re never going to get it. Because when you get to heaven – that’s not eternal, that’s just everlasting. Heaven lasts a long time – it’s not eternal – it’s everlasting. The eternal is beyond time. The concept of time shuts out eternity. Time is our experience.

But the ultimate unqualified mystery is beyond human experience. It becomes inflected. As they say there is a condescension on the part of the infinite to the mind of man and that is what looks like god.

BM: So whatever it is we experience we have to express in language that is just not up to the occasion.

JC: That’s it! That’s what poetry is for -- poetry is a language that has to be penetrated – it doesn’t shut you off -- it opens – it’s the rhythm -- the precise choice of words that will have implications and suggestions that go past the word -- is what has to happen and then you get what Joyce calls the radiance – the epiphany -- the epiphany is the showing through of the essence – what Aquinas calls the Quidditas --the whatness – the whatness is the Brahman -

BM: Why do you think there is in people this deep yearning to live forever – to secure my place in heaven?

JC: When you realize what heaven is -- in the works of such person as Thomas Aquinas -- it is the beholding of the beatific image of God -- which is a timeless moment – time explodes – so again eternity is not something everlasting -- and you can have it right here and now in your relationships.

I’ve lost a lot of friends – my parents and all -- and a realization that has come to me very, very keenly is that I haven’t lost them -- that moment when I was with them had an everlasting quality about it that is now still with me -- what it gave me is still with me – And there’s a kind of intimation of immortality in that. Do you see what Imean?

There is a story of the Buddha who encountered a woman who had just lost her son and she was in great grief and the Buddha suggests that she just ask around to meet someone who had not lost a treasured child, or husband, or relative, or friend -- this business of understanding this relationship of mortality -- there is something in you that is transcendent of mortality is the big job.

12-of-14


Schopenhauer – The composed order of life

JC: There’s a wonderful work of Schopenhauer – he says when you reach a certain age (and he wrote this when he was in his 60’s or so) – and look back over your life it seems to have had an order – it seems to have been composed by someone – and those events that when they occurred seemed merely accidental and occasional and just something that happened – turn out to be the main elements in a consistent plot –so he says “Who composed this plot?” and just as your dreams are composed by an aspect of yourself of which your consciousness is unaware -- so your whole life has been composed by the will within you – and then he says -- just as the those people whom you met by chance became effective agents in the structuring of your life, so you have been an agent in the structuring of other lives and the whole thing gears together like one big symphony he says -- everything influencing and structuring everything else – he said it’s as though our lives were the dream of a single dreamer in which all the dream characters are dreaming too and so everything links to everything else -- moved out of the will in nature.

It’s a beautiful idea.

It’s an idea that occurs in India – in the image of the Net of Indra – the net of gems –where every gem reflects all the other ones. And they also have the idea of spontaneous and simultaneous arising - everything arises in relation to everything else and so you can't blame anybody for anything . . . It’s all working around -- It’s a marvelous idea . . .

It’s as though there were an intention behind it --- and yet it is all by chance – none of us has lived the life that he intended.

I don’t believe life has a real purpose. When you really see what life is – it’s a lot of protoplasm with an urge to reproduce and continue in being.

Follow your bliss

JC: Just sheer life can’t be said to have a purpose – because look at all the different purposes it has all over the lot -- but each incarnation has a potentiality and the function of life is to live that potentiality. Well how do you do it?

Well again, when my students would ask – “should I do this? should I do that – dad says I should do this–”

My answer is “follow your bliss” there’s something inside you that knows you’re in the center – that knows you’re on the beam – that knows you’re off the beam and if you get off the beam to earn money – you’ve lost your life.

BM: So it’s not the destination that counts – it’s the journey?

13-of-14


JC: Yes. There’s a wonderful old man … in Germany -- Karlfried Graf Durckheim –and he says “when you’re on a journey and the end keeps getting further and further away – then you realize that the real end is the journey. It’s not bad. This is it. This moment now is the heavenly moment.

Eden is – “the kingdom of the father spread upon the earth and men do not see it” I mean Eden is.

Shiva – lord of the dance

JC: That’s the dance of the world – the dancer whose dance is the universe and in this hand he has a little drum that goes tick, tick, tick, -- that is the drum of time –the tick of time which shuts out eternity and we are enclosed in that – in this hand there is a flame which burns away the veil of time and opens us up to eternity.

And in his hair is a skull and a new moon – the death and rebirth at the same moment – the moment of becoming.

Well the goal of your quest for yourself is to find that burning point in yourself –that becoming thing in yourself which is fearless and desireless, but just becoming.

This is the condition of a warrior going into battle with perfect courage – that’s life in movement. A plant growing. I think of grass you know -- every two weeks a chap comes out with a lawnmower and cuts it down -- suppose the grass were to say “well for Pete’s sake -- what’s the use.” It’s the coming into being – the life point in you -- and that’s what these myths are concerned to communicate to you.

BM: I’ve always interpreted that powerful mysterious statement “the word was made flesh” as this eternal principle finding itself in the human journey – in the human experience. Now, I don’t know what the word is and I don’t even know what flesh is, but I know that there is that experience of epiphany -- when you meet what you don’t know and understand it.

JC: And you can find it in yourself too – the word in yourself.

BM Where do you find it if you don’t find it in yourself?

14-of-14


Metaphors

JC: Goode says –“All things are metaphors” – [German] – everything that’s transitory is but a metaphorical reference. That’s what we all are. And to see the word – getting back to your radiance that we spoke of before comes out here again now.

BM: But how does one worship a metaphor, love a metaphor, die for a metaphor . . .

JC: Well that’s what people are doing all over the place -- that’s what people are doing all over the place -- dieing for metaphors -- and when you really realize the sound AUM the sound of the mystery of the word everywhere then you don’t have to go out and die for anything -- because it’s right there -- all around – and just sit still and see it and experience it and know it.

AUM

JC: AUM is a word that represents to our ears that sound of the energy of the universe of which all things are manifestations. And AUM - it’s a wonderful word. It’s written AUM. You start at the back of the mouth -- Ah – and then ooo – you fill the mouth –and mmm closes at the mouth and when you have pronounced this properly -- all vowel sounds are in that pronunciation – AUM – and consonants are regarded simply as interruptions of AUM – and all words are thus fragments of AUM - as all images are fragments of the form of forms of which all things are just reflections.

And so AUM is a symbol -- a symbolic sound that puts you in touch with that throbbing being that is the universe. And when you hear some of these Tibetan monks that are over here from the Gupta Monastery outside of Lhasa -- when they sing the AUM – you know what it means alright.

That's the zoooom of being in the world – and to be in touch with that and to get the sense of that – that is the peak experience of all – A U M -- the birth – the coming into being -- and the dissolution - the cycle of that – and this is called the 4 element syllable -- what is the 4th element -- a -- oo -- m and the silence out of which it comes and back into which it goes and which underlies it – now my life is the a – oo – mm but there is a silence that underlies it – and that is what we would call the immortal – this is the mortal and that’s the immortal – and there wouldn’t be this if there weren’t that.

BM: The meaning is essentially wordless.

JC: Yes. Well, words are always qualifications and limitations.

BM: And yet, Joe all we puny human beings are left with is this miserable language –beautiful though it is -- that falls short of trying to describe . . .

JC: That’s right. And that’s why it’s a peak experience to break past all that every now and then – to realize it – o – a -- I think so.

Smart/Soft Power CT/COIN/Stability Strategy -> GlobalServiceAcademy@GovIsland (PowerofMyth-4thru6)

Documents

Transcript of Smart/Soft Power CT/COIN/Stability Strategy -> GlobalServiceAcademy@GovIsland (PowerofMyth-4thru6)