Christophe Veys Project Director Smart@Fire & Procurement legal advisor
Smart@Fire Christophe Veys Project Director Smart@Fire & Procurement legal advisor Innovation Agency...
-
Upload
ruth-jennings -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of Smart@Fire Christophe Veys Project Director Smart@Fire & Procurement legal advisor Innovation Agency...
Smart@FireChristophe Veys
Project Director Smart@Fire
& Procurement legal advisor
Innovation Agency of Flanders (IWT)
ENPROTEX 10th
December 2015
Partners
2
5 Procurers
2 Innovation Agencies
1 University
1 Confederation
1 Notified body
1 innovation management
company
Objectives
Develop innovative Personal Protective Systems to reduce risks inherent to firefighting.
Create a commonly agreed approach for pre-commercial procurement (PCP) that can be deployed and duplicated in the EU.
Project duration: 01/2013 till 12/2016
3
4
Public procurement
Innovation
Pre-commercial procurement
Innovation- friendly PPI
PPI-PCP- Innovation friendly
5
① Innovation-friendly procurement encourage procurers to leave room for innovation in their purchasing proces (mindset and procedural aspects)
② Public Procurement of Innovation (PPI): purchase of innovative solutions available (or partly available) on the market (new for the procurer)
③ Pre-commercial procurement
is a phased approach of purchasing R&D services by procurers for the development of innovative products, services or processes (not yet available on the market) by enterprises/ research centres with as goal: • To solve socio-economic challenges• To improve the performance, functionality of public services
Definitions
Risk
s
Distance of the solutions (to be developed) to the market
Innovation- friendly
PPI
PCP
R&D
Risks vs distance to market
Phase 3: Pre-commercial procurement
Phase 2: Market consultations
Development of prototypes
Phase 4: Commercial purchasing
Purchase of a final product
Phase 1: Needs assesment of firefighters & state-of-the-art Febrary 2013 till June 2013
PCP Smart@fire
7
September –December 2013 July 2014 – December 2015 Januray 2016
How can I increase my safety and reduce risks undertaking fire fighting and other civil protection work?
Needs assessmentPhase 1: Needs assesment of firefighters & state-of-the-art
Phase 2: Market consultations
Market Consultation
9
September – November 2013
• > 450 participants (enterprises/universities/procurers) attended the different market consultation sessions
• Feasability check & Risks assessment• Summary of the findings both innovation expectations
vs technological feasability. Prioritization! • Preparation of the tender documents and submitted in
February 2014 for approval to the EC
Confidential Copyright TSS
Prototype priorities
Added Value
Risk
Prototype Scope: value vs. risk
L H
H
L
DO DERISK
Off-the-shelf Avoid if possible
Innovation potential from
end-user perspective
Innovation potential from technological perspective
Priorities on prototype roadmap Innovative for end-user
= +Significant technological risk
Market consultations
Belgium (Brussels, 10 & 11/9/2013)Localisation systems
Integration of ICT solutions in PPE
France (Marseille, 17 & 18/9/2013Data transfer & visualisation systems
Integration of ICT solutions in PPE
Germany (Dortmund, 1 & 2/10/2013)Sensors
Integration of ICT solutions in PPE
Wrap-up session (10/10/2013)
Overall participants per country
Belgium37%
Australia1%
Austria2%
Czech Republic1%Denmark
2%Estonia1%
Finland2%
France21%
Germany13%
Greece1%
Lithuania3%
Netherlands7%
Norway1%
Slovenia2%
Spain3%
Switzerland2%
UK4%
USA1%
Total number of participants: 470/170 different/18 countries
Phase 2: Market consultations
PCP in 4 phases
13
September – October 2013
Pre-commercial procurement phase
Phase 3: Pre-commercial procurement
Stage 1 •Solution Exploration
Stage 2 •Prototyping & Demo
Stage 3 •Testing first batch of complete products
14
Scope of the Pre-commercial tender:
15
Confidential Copyright TSS6
State of play
• Tender launched in OJEU 11 June 2014 (2014/S 110-194508) + Information day 1st of July (65) :• Challenge brief• Invitation to Tender• Framework agreement
• Bids submitted in October, Award on the 26 of November4 consortia were selected
17
Stage 1Solution Exploration
Consortium Submitted date Partner Correspondent E-MailPrevent Deloza Ltd. Andreja Oder [email protected] Ltd. Daniela Zavec Pavlinic [email protected] Knowledge Center, Obuda Miklos Kozlovszky [email protected] Ltd. Krisztina Szarvas [email protected] Gmbh-Geselschaft für Intelligente Textile Klaus Richter [email protected]
e-BO Enterprises NV Christophe Dhaene [email protected] NV Thomas Seynaeve [email protected]
Uwe Heinemann [email protected] Valle-Klann Markus Valle-Klann <[email protected]>
BHT Solutions Herman Oberwalder [email protected] Ronald Van Kampen [email protected] International nv Mr. Leon Rousseau [email protected] Andy Thurman [email protected] s.r.o. Milan Baxa [email protected] s.r.o. Roman Kotrc [email protected] International Tomas Pekar [email protected] s.r.o. Petr Loukota [email protected] of West Bohemia Ales Hamacek [email protected] s.r.l. (sub-contranctor) Enrico De Marinis [email protected]
Texport
Consortium 1
Consortium 2
Consortium 3
Consortium 4
10/06/201516:54
10/06/201516:57
10/06/201524:00
8/06/201510:22
Submit deliverables Solution Design & End of Phase 1:
• On April 30 2015, after 4 months of preparing their solution design, all 4 consortia submitted the following 4 deliverables:
1. End of Phase Report
2. Detailed solution Design
3. Request for clarification
4. List Background IPR
• In order to evaluate the quality of all submitted deliverables, a jury was appointed
o 2 representatives of the end-users (SDIS13 – IBZ)o 1 IWT advisor o 2 independant external experts
Solution ExplorationStage 1
The Jury Criteria evaluated the satisfactory completion
• The jury evaluated the deliverables in order to see if the execution of phase 1 was in line with the work submitted in the bids.
• Results:
• All four participating consortia completed their first phase in a satisfactory way.
• As a result, all four participating consortia received their requested payments for phase 11/ Applycon 2/ Texport: 3/ E-Bo enterprises: 4/ Prevent & Deloza
Solution Exploration
• Detailed assessment of the solution design and the request for clarification were evaluated by scoring these deliverables on 4 evaluation criteria.
• For Successful completion of phase 1 and to obtain the access to phase 2, the following minimum scoring requirements had to be attained.
The end of phase report should be evaluated as satisfactory
The average score over all 4 criteria, taking the different weightings into account, should be min. 50%.
The contractors should score min. 60% on criteria I and criteria IV.
Invitation To Tender phase 2 (ITT2): Prototyping & Demonstration
• Based on the original Invitation to Tender (ITT 1), a new Invitation to Tender (ITT2), with specific requirements for Phase 2, was produced by IWT in cooperation with Addestino and appointed partners.
• A lot of efforts went to the development of a more accurate description of the Evaluation Process at the end of phase 2 and a list of expectations regarding the results to be achieved at the End of Phase 2.
• On May 18, 2015 all 4 consortia were invited to submit a bid for phase 2. All eligible bids had to be submitted before June 11, 2015.
• After evaluation 3 Tenderers with the highest ranking were selected
Prototyping
www.smartatfire.eu Christophe Veys
Project Director Smart@Fire
& Procurement legal advisor