Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium On Track and Moving Forward Urban District Leadership...
-
Upload
leslie-arnold -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium On Track and Moving Forward Urban District Leadership...
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
On Track and Moving Forward
Urban District Leadership Networks
May 21-23 Tampa, FL
Joe Willhoft, Executive Director
A Next Generation of Assessments
Align to Common Core State Standards in mathematics and English language arts/literacy
Rigorously assess progress toward “college and career readiness”
Use common cut scores across the Consortium Provide achievement and growth information Tests that are valid, reliable, and fair for all students
(except those with “significant cognitive disabilities”)
Use multiple measures of student performance Use online technologies Be operational in the 2014-15 school year
A Balanced Assessment System
Common Core State Standards specify
K-12 expectatio
ns for college and
career readiness
All students
leave high
school college
and career ready
Teachers and schools have information and tools
they need to improve
teaching and learning
Summative: College and career
readiness assessments for
accountability
Interim: Flexible and open
assessments, used for actionable
feedback
Formative resources:Supporting
classroom-based assessments to
improve instruction
“Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in English Language arts and literacy.”
“Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.”
“Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts.”
“Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purposes and audiences.”
“Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences.”
“Students can engage in research and inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information.”
Overall Claim for Grades 3-8
Overall Claim for Grade 11
Claim #1 - Reading
Claim #2 - Writing
Claim #3 - Speaking and Listening
Claim #4 - Research/Inquiry
Score Reports for ELA/Literacy
“Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in mathematics.”
“Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in mathematics.”
“Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency.”
“Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies.”
“Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.”
“Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.”
Overall Claim for Grades 3-8
Overall Claim for Grade 11
Claim #1 - Concepts & Procedures
Claim #2 - Problem Solving
Claim #3 - Communicating Reasoning
Claim #4 - Modeling and Data Analysis
Score Reports for Mathematics
Purposes and Users for the Summative Assessments
Grades Tested Purpose User
3-8 and 11 School/District/State Accountability
Federal ESEA/NCLB
11 Student Readiness for Credit-bearing College Coursework
Higher Ed. Institutions
9, 10, 12 State Designed End-of-Course, Graduation Requirements, etc. State Option
3-8 and 11 Teacher/Principal Accountability
State/District Option
• 26 member states and territories representing 39% of K-12 students
• 21 Governing States, 4 Advisory States, 1 Affiliate Member
• Washington state is fiscal agent
• WestEd provides project management services
A State-led Assessment Consortium:Test Development
• Future affiliation with the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, & Student Testing (CRESST) at UCLA
A State-led Assessment Consortium:Sustainability for 2014-15 and Beyond
Major Milestones in Development of Summative Assessments
Cognitive Labs Apr –
Aug 2012
Small Scale
Trials Mar –
Nov 2012
PilotFeb – May 2013
Field Test
Mar – June 2014
Deploy For
Operational Use
Sep 2014
✔ ✔ ✔
Early Q.C. of items & software; no student results Full system run-through; Establish performance standards;some results
Pilot Testing
• Began February 20; ends May 24
• Sample of about 10% of students in ConsortiumRecruited 1 million students in 5,000+ schools
• Purpose: Evaluate the efficacy of our first 5,000 items & tasks…
Do our Performance Tasks that involve real-world problem-solving work well?
Can we computer-score open-ended questions? Can students use the online tools? Have we avoided bias in our items/tasks? How well are we measuring grade-to-grade
growth?
• Practice Test available May 2013
Field Testing
• Begins March 2014; ends June 2014
• Sample of about 25% of students in Consortium 2.5 million students in selected schools
• Purpose: Evaluate items and tasks to establish the Smarter Balanced pool…
Statistical data analysis of 44,000+ items Separate items/tasks into secure (summative) pool
and open (interim) pool Conduct standard setting for different performance
levels (“cut scores”)
• States & USED developing ways to avoid double testing
Technology Requirements: Responding to School Needs
• Standards have been established for new and existing hardware
• Online “Readiness Tool” – Schools and districts can evaluate technology readiness
• Schools do NOT need one-to-one computers– Illustrative example: A 600-student school can be supported by a
single 30-computer lab
• Pencil-and-paper option available for three-year transition period
• Practice test with full array of tools and features available starting in May 2013
Educator Recruitment:Test Development Activities
• Pilot scoring – Range finding May 14-28
• Pilot data review May 23 – June 6
• Field Test item writing May16-30
• Field Test passage review May23 – June 6
• Committees – Content;
Bias & Sensitivity; Accessibility June 14 – July 17
Point of Contact: State’s “Teacher Involvement Coordinator”
Educator Recruitment:Design of Formative and PD Tools
• State Leadership Teams (SLT)
recruited and selected (8-12 per state) Apr 6-May 17
• State Network of Educators (SNE)members recruited and selected(avg. of 100 per state) May 5-June6
Point of Contact: State’s “State Leadership Team”
Lead
Learn More and Stay Engaged
• Visit www.smarterbalanced.orgfor the latest news and developments
• Sign up for our e-newsletter
• Follow us on Twitter at @SmarterBalanced