SDMS DocID 468847

Superfund Ticcords i SITE (noVtltgti^ BREAK Z bull 2~J

OTHER 1320121

EATA VALIEATIGN LETTER REPORT bullpJsas^ X ^pli-ts ORGANIC OVSE 11766 norrroLO SITE RI PS

RA3NQND NEN HAMPSHIBE

Prepared for

US EXtVIROraiENDVL FROIECTICN AGENCY Office of Waste Programs Bnforcement

Washington DC 20460

Work Assignment No C01030 EPA Region I Site No NH03 CDM Federal Corporation Doc No TES5-C01030-LR-BJRF Prepared 6y FPC Work Assignment Project Manager Anita Rigassio Telej^ione No (617) 742-2659 Primary Contact Roger Duwart Telephone No (617) 573-9628 Date Prepared rNovember 3 1989

October 19 1989

Mr Dennis Gagne US Environmental Protection Agency JFK Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Contract 68-W9-0002 Work Assignment C01030 Case 11766 SDG AP765 CEIMIC Laboratory MOTTOLO Raymond New Hanpshire Semivolatiles 12Water AP751-755 757-760 765 766

4soilAP756 761-763 PesticidesPCBs 12A^ter AP751-755 757-760 765 766

4soilAP756 761-763

Dear Mr Gagne

A validation was performed on the extracteible organic analytical data from 12 low level water sanples and four low level soil sanples collected by CDM Federal Programs Corporation (FPC) at the Mottolo site Extractable data consists of those from einalyses of the semivolatile eind pesticidePCB fractions The data were evaluated based on the following parameters

- data completeness - holding times

- GCMS tuning - calibrations - bletnks - surrogate recoveries - matrix spiketaatrix spike duplicate

- field duplicates - internal standard performance _ pesticide instrument performeince mdash conpound identification _ conpound quantitation

All criteria were met for this parameter

Table I summarizes the validation recommendations which were based on the following information

Etolding Time

BNA extraction of sanples AP757 AP758 and AP753RE grossly exceeded holding times and so the BNA data (all non-detects) are considered unusable eind should be rejected (R)

Mr Dennis Gagne October 19 1989 Page Two

Data conpleteness

The raw data which acconpany BNA continuing calibration (CC) 51989 0943 summary Form VII were missing from the data package The laboratory was contacted on September 15 1989 for submission of the data FPC received the data on October 20 1989

Calibrations

Review of semivolatile calibration data revealed the QC exceedances given below All SPCC and CCC criteria were met

Conpound IC 55 CC 519 CC 523 CC 525 CC 526

benzyl alcohol X X X X X 33-dichlorobenzene X benzoic acid X 24-dinitrophenol X X 4-nitroaniline X butylbenzylphthalate X X X X bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate X X 3-nitrociniline X hexachlorobenzene X X 2-methylnaphthalene X X hexachlorocyclopentadiene X

Associated Sanples AP751shy AP751 AP753shy AP756 AP757 AP766 AP752 AP755 AP759 AP758

AP760shy AP766 AP765 AP753RE

XX - mean RF or RFlt005 Estimate positive results (J) and reject nondetect results (R)

X - RSDgt30 for IC or Dgt25 for CC estimate positive results (J) Dgt50 estimate positive results (J) and nondetect results (UJ)

Blanks

Sanple AP765 was a trip blank for this case Diethylphthalate was detected at 4 ugL in the trip blank Three BNA laboratory blanks were analyzed and no TCL coopounds were detected in any of them only a few TICs were detected Three pesticidePCB laboratory blanks were analyzed and all were found to be free from contamination

October 19 1989

Mr Dennis Gagne US Environmental Protection Agency JFK Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Contract 68-W9-0002 Work Assignment C01030 Case 11766 SDG AP765 CEIMIC Laboratory MOTTOLO Raymond New Hanpshire Semivolatiles 12Water AP751-755 757-760 765 766

4soilAP756 761-763 PesticidesPCBs 12A^ter AP751-755 757-760 765 766

4soilAP756 761-763

Dear Mr Gagne

A validation was performed on the extracteible organic analytical data from 12 low level water sanples and four low level soil sanples collected by CDM Federal Programs Corporation (FPC) at the Mottolo site Extractable data consists of those from einalyses of the semivolatile eind pesticidePCB fractions The data were evaluated based on the following parameters

- data completeness - holding times

- GCMS tuning - calibrations - bletnks - surrogate recoveries - matrix spiketaatrix spike duplicate

- field duplicates - internal standard performance _ pesticide instrument performeince mdash conpound identification _ conpound quantitation

All criteria were met for this parameter

Table I summarizes the validation recommendations which were based on the following information

Etolding Time

BNA extraction of sanples AP757 AP758 and AP753RE grossly exceeded holding times and so the BNA data (all non-detects) are considered unusable eind should be rejected (R)

Mr Dennis Gagne October 19 1989 Page Two

Data conpleteness

The raw data which acconpany BNA continuing calibration (CC) 51989 0943 summary Form VII were missing from the data package The laboratory was contacted on September 15 1989 for submission of the data FPC received the data on October 20 1989

Calibrations

Review of semivolatile calibration data revealed the QC exceedances given below All SPCC and CCC criteria were met

Conpound IC 55 CC 519 CC 523 CC 525 CC 526

benzyl alcohol X X X X X 33-dichlorobenzene X benzoic acid X 24-dinitrophenol X X 4-nitroaniline X butylbenzylphthalate X X X X bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate X X 3-nitrociniline X hexachlorobenzene X X 2-methylnaphthalene X X hexachlorocyclopentadiene X

Associated Sanples AP751shy AP751 AP753shy AP756 AP757 AP766 AP752 AP755 AP759 AP758

AP760shy AP766 AP765 AP753RE

XX - mean RF or RFlt005 Estimate positive results (J) and reject nondetect results (R)

X - RSDgt30 for IC or Dgt25 for CC estimate positive results (J) Dgt50 estimate positive results (J) and nondetect results (UJ)

Blanks

Sanple AP765 was a trip blank for this case Diethylphthalate was detected at 4 ugL in the trip blank Three BNA laboratory blanks were analyzed and no TCL coopounds were detected in any of them only a few TICs were detected Three pesticidePCB laboratory blanks were analyzed and all were found to be free from contamination

Mr Dennis Gagne October 19 1989 Page Two

Data conpleteness

The raw data which acconpany BNA continuing calibration (CC) 51989 0943 summary Form VII were missing from the data package The laboratory was contacted on September 15 1989 for submission of the data FPC received the data on October 20 1989

Calibrations

Review of semivolatile calibration data revealed the QC exceedances given below All SPCC and CCC criteria were met

Conpound IC 55 CC 519 CC 523 CC 525 CC 526

benzyl alcohol X X X X X 33-dichlorobenzene X benzoic acid X 24-dinitrophenol X X 4-nitroaniline X butylbenzylphthalate X X X X bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate X X 3-nitrociniline X hexachlorobenzene X X 2-methylnaphthalene X X hexachlorocyclopentadiene X

Associated Sanples AP751shy AP751 AP753shy AP756 AP757 AP766 AP752 AP755 AP759 AP758

AP760shy AP766 AP765 AP753RE

XX - mean RF or RFlt005 Estimate positive results (J) and reject nondetect results (R)

X - RSDgt30 for IC or Dgt25 for CC estimate positive results (J) Dgt50 estimate positive results (J) and nondetect results (UJ)

Blanks

Sanple AP765 was a trip blank for this case Diethylphthalate was detected at 4 ugL in the trip blank Three BNA laboratory blanks were analyzed and no TCL coopounds were detected in any of them only a few TICs were detected Three pesticidePCB laboratory blanks were analyzed and all were found to be free from contamination

Mr Dennis Gagne October 19 1989 Page Three

Maximum Concentration Action Level Conpotjnd ugL mgkg ugL mgAg

diethylphthalate 4 08 40 8

Diethylphthalate was not detected in any sanple besides the trip blank so no action on the data is recommended Since phthalates are common ledx)ratory contaminants the fact that a trip blank contaminant was not detected in any field sanple does not warrant einy further investigation

Surrogate Recoveries

The surrogate percent recoveries vrtiich did not meet QC criteria are simimarized below

Recovery TR NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TBP DBC

AP 753 AP 753RE AP 758 AP 765 AP 751

3 1

8 0 14

128 429

Based on the surrogate recoveries above the following actions are recommended Sanples AP753 and AP753RE nondetects are qualified as unusable (R) and positive results are considered estimated (J) due to the extremely low recoveries of nitrobenzene-d5 and 2-fluorobiphenyl in both analyses Sanples AP758 and AP765 are not qualified because only one surrogate R per sample fraction was outside of the QC criteria and Rs were greater than 10 In sanple AP761 no action was necessary on the pesticidePCB fraction because there were no positive results in the sanple so the possibility of false positives does not exist

Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate

The following results did not meet QC criteria

sanple Spike Caipdund R RPD

AP763 MS BNA 24-Dinitrotoluene 90 AP752 MSD PEST Aldrin 26 AP763 MS PEST gamma-BHC 162 AP763 MS PEST Heptachlor 133 AP763 MSD PEST gamma-BHC 161 AP763 MSD PEST Heptachlor 135

Mr Dennis Gagne October 19 1989 Page Four

No qualification of data based on the matrix spike results is required because none of the ainalytes exceeding QC criteria were detected in the associated unspiked samples

Compound Quantitation

CRQLs reported as 550 ugAg on Form I for the BNA fraction of sanple AP762 were incorrect The correct value is 520 ugAg All other CRQLs were reported correctly Hie laboratory was contacted and a corrected Form I was resubmitted

Very truly yours

can Federal Programs Cor

Rigassio CLP Lead Chemist

John Walker

TES V Regional Mcinager

Enclosures

cc D Szaro US EPA Region I Deputy Project Officer

MOTTOLO CASE 11766

TABLE I - RECOMMENDATI(raquoJS SUMMARY

TR NoS BN Acid PestPCB

AP751 A AP752 A AP753 A AP753RE J NA AP754 A A AP755 A A AP756 A AP757 A AP758 R A AP759 AA AP760 AA AP761 AA AP762 AA AP763 AA AP764 AA AP765 AA AP766 A A

- Accept all data

- Accept but estimate all benzyl alcohol results due to calibration

bull results --bullbull- 3 3 -- 3~- -I-

J - Estimate positive results (J) and reject nondetect results (R) due to poor surrogate recoveries

- Reject all nondetect results due to excessive holding time

MOTTOLO CASE 11766

TABLE II - TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUND (TIC) SUMMARY

TIC AP753 AP756 AP757 AP762

2-Chloro-ethanol phosphate X

2-Butoxy-ethanol phosphate X X

3-Hydroxy-3-methy1-2-Heptanone

Sulfur X

X - conpound was detected

Data Sumnary Key

A - Acceptable data

J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity

R - Reject data due to quality control criteria exceeded Itie data are vinusable (conpound may or may not be present) Resanpling and reanalysis is necessary for verification

U - The conpound was analyzed for but considered not detected The associated nvimerical value is the sanple quantitation limit

UJ - The conpovind was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is an estimated queintity

The conpound was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is the same as the CRQL presented

iMyenl l l4t i lsect i^Jtaut fdgt4lHt

SITCiWIlOU)

CXlM7M

VMU I K t I l I M i u m i M W ItNMTOn W I K I

M i t i i ^ n

a m m

PIIIMI t l l O - O i l o r o t t t t l l i t b t r ] -CI i lvoraquoMml 13-laquoichl( ro6Mim l t - h c H l v a M u m bull n o t bull lc (o l I M i c b l o r g k M i n t MMbr lpAx io l l l l l - C l i l o r g i U ( r w r l l t i t e r laquo-laquotkr l ) tlaquo i io l

bullHl l t m - l i - t t - t r f l f Tl M l te H n i U l o r o r t t i w gt i l r laquo w i f M I t teteroH 2 - l i l r t egt iM l 2laquo-HteltJlritteMl teuolc k l lt l i i l K H I o r o t t k a T l w I t e w 2laquo- l lcMaroraquol iml l gtlaquo-Tr icMiroteUMt bull V l i t i u l i o t bull - O l o r o a i l l M

Ik iac l i lgroty t te i iw

laquo - a i o r a - ] H M t r t ^ n gt gt 2-i inkriupniuiM Hnlaquok la rKyltgt te te t te ln i laquo t - T r i c l l i r e i t e M l gtlaquogt-lricklarapliMOl 2 -O i l e rmpMk l l iM 2 - i t r M gt i l i M t i t e t t r l ^ k t l u l M l k m o k l k y l n t 2 t - h i i t r oltD lMM SHHtroMi l i te bullCHip t tkMI 2 laquo - l i a i t r ^ l laquo l 4-1)1 trspMMl DiktezsfvM 2 lt - | i i i t r o to lGn t D i i t k r I i t t k i l a U - a i l i i f l m j l - f t ea r l r tw r F l u r n lt - lt i l r o laquo l l l u 4 t~ t i i i t rQ- l - IMk | lraquoklaquo io l gt - lt l t m t e i p t e l i [ l i laquo i t e l l l v l gt M H k i i | l - W w laquo t l laquo l t e r teitcklorteteitei Ptetaik lorwteMl H i M M t t r i n teUrute h - raquo ^ t i r l p M k t l i U F l t e r M t t e n r r r laquo t W f t t M i r l ^ t t e l a t o ] - t i c k | g r o k i u l 4 i w l n i o ( t l t e t k r a c i M ttryw l i l ( I - laquo n T l t e l y I I raquo t t t lt I l l l M - n c t gt l f M K l l i t gt i M i i l t l f l M r a t k M taiiolklMterMttM m n d l a r r M f l t e laquo o ( l 2 gt - M i t r M t gt i k ( u U b l M t k r K M t N H ( | k l l p laquo T l m

cm

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IC 10 10 10 JO M 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 M 10 K 10 10 10

w 10 K 30 10 10 10 10 10 N

raquo10 10 10 90 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

M - H W - l l t oii-4ta l lraquo-4tl n- in laquo-4 M-ISI m-vsa S I S-II laquo-nt (bull-101 M

laquoraquo7S1 raquo raquo t u n tflSlK raquoHM u m i r 3 ) 4P731 bull f IS I HUH bull f 7 U ltri9 m u IMOtM] motMi bullWOtMl NOOklH IIOOtM) nookioi 81004101 81004(10 81O0MI4 MOOHD noOMU bull W O M O l

msBSWflSBIBB^ flWSWBBSIISft

10 U 10 IU 10 IU low 10 IU 10 IM 10 IU 10 U 10 IU

u

3i

U

4 J

I I

gt bull 9 BMWM WMM St fV AS f l

DiuniM Ficnai 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MTf M V U t t 4M0I1 4 i a f n laquo2on 4 20n 4 i i a i 42011 41101 41111 42l)laquo1 42481 42011 42081 42011 MFE HTMCTa 421n 421n 421at 32411 42111 4 21 i l 32tS1 3 j4ai 421H 421B1 42181 42181 42181 MFC t M l T I U t S l raquo laquo 5nn 32319 32411 32311 324W 32481 52411 32581 32581 52381 32381 32481

I SMivslJtili Sdi l u l p i i

i rc i ion iu

itt7M

SMgtU UCITIOiI^AirU Rl EAiru u a a

Wrmvim CKH

Phtnol 330

Igt f ( 3 - Q i l v s r t i i r l ) t t t i i r 330

I 2-OiIworaquoli(Ofll 330 lJ-OicraquoiloraStoeJraquo 330

raquo - D j c M x o t n 2 t M 330

Bcnjyl AUotel 330

l 2 -D icUor f tSraquo fraquo t 330 I| 2 - l l t th r l f lMMl 330 I

I t il2- tk laro i^^f l l i thir 330 4-ltltthTlplIieMl 330 l lHIitroso-ti-a-prgprluini 330 Hiilaquochlcrottkat 330

I litrobe8znt 330 IsophvoM 330 2-ll itrevtanl 330 2lt-DiMtftrlraquotaraquoI 330

I Btaioic lcilt liOO t i tfJ-OUoriaUoiTintbjnf 330 2laquo-(icklarovlgtiael 330 124-Trirtloroktaine 330 IUphth4ltet 330

I I

4-Oilaroiiiiliot 330 HtKchloratotidinf 330 4-DilorB-3-)lftiTlfol 330 -lltthrltMp(itliIegtt 330 Htiiclil9rocrIopt9tidien( 330 24t-Trict l i rKlno 330 24i-Triioraeraquosl 1400 2-Oilergai^tbilcGlaquo 330 - laquo i t r 3 raquo i l i M liOO S iMthr lpt t lu l lU 330

I AcnapbUrlat 330 2amp-gtigtitrgtBlaw 330 JHI i t roMil iM UOO Dccnipkttnf 330

I I

24-DiaitrapOBol ItOO 4 - laquo t r e 0 n s i liOO Dibauef iru 330 2 - t i t i t n i B l a B i 330 l i t tb r lpk tk i l i te 330 4-ailoreli(arl-IVarlcthtr 330 H u r t M 330 laquo - l i t roau l iM 1600 46-Dicitre-2-flrtkrlpgtilaquonol 1600

I I

bull-bull i t rnadi tasr laa iHl l l 330 l -arotor tanl- tanl tUer 330 IhxKblBrgbmai 330 gtntipoundUargptageI 1600 Pb is t fUrot 330 RBthrxtM 330 Bi-laquo-tatTl|MbillaquoU 330 f l u r o U B c 330 P r t M 334

I I

ktYlbecTlpMkil j tc 330 33-eictlarg6f(Ki4iBr 660 Bn io la lc tUr t fnc 330 Oirytem 330 B i t (2- t tkTlknrn| l i t l i i l i t t 330Di-ii-laquoctrlpttbtllaquott 330 B tMon i l l a r iaUcM 330 lBU0(k) l lHr iBaat 334 Rnze(laquo)nm( 330 l i a taeH2 3 -a n r tn 330 Biktalak)jsUrltctgf 330

S-6 S-] S-13 S-t t t m raquo m laquoP7i2 AP7i3

430 IM UO IU 320 UJ JBO UJ

210 J

x = sssx rsslaquosTsssH=ssx i i cs s=saslaquossss3 ies r=3x3sssrsxxsxlaquox=5=s ssaxsssxs ts=

(IIUTIIM FtCT0lll2 MLUTICM FlaquoCTDIt0 IlLUTIOH FACTO) 11 DlUITin FACTOR 10

DATE EITtlaquoCTEl)4278f MTE EITRACTED42689 MTE EITRACTES42789 MTE EITmCTEII42689

MTE MULr2Egt32389 MTE AMLy2EIS2S89 MTE IWLgt2Egt-S2S89 MTE AMUrZECS238f

MTE SMmai42089 NTE SAIinpoundS424n MTE SlaquoMgtIED420B9 MTE SMinE042OBf

331 Noistari SOI I to i t tu r i 401 Hoit turt 431 h i i t u r t

I

PesticidePCB Aoueous Analysis

SITEtHOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAMgtLE NUHBER SANPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugL

CONPOUNDssss=ssss=sss=sss=s===ss

alpha-BHC

beta-BtC delta-BHC

gaMa-K4C (Lindane) Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor Epoiide

Endosulfan I

Die ldr in

44--DDE Endrin

Endosulfan I I

44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin Ketone

alpha-Chlordane gaua-Chlordane

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124a

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

DILUTION FACTORDATE SAMPLEDDATE EmACTEDDATE ANALYZED

CRQL

005 005 005

005 005

005 005 005

010

010

010

010

010

010 010

05 010

005 005 10

005 005 005

005

005

10 10

fiP751 AP752 AP753 AP754 AP755 AP757 AP758 AP759 AP760 AP764 AP765 AP766

HW-BS HM-13D Qli-4SR NH-ISD S-6 H0-3SR N03SRD S-3 S-13 HN-l lD NN-lOl S-9

l l l l l l l l l l l l 4 lB 418 419 419 420 419 419 420 420 420 420 420

421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 529 529 530 550 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

Mr Dennis Gagne October 19 1989 Page Four

No qualification of data based on the matrix spike results is required because none of the ainalytes exceeding QC criteria were detected in the associated unspiked samples

Compound Quantitation

CRQLs reported as 550 ugAg on Form I for the BNA fraction of sanple AP762 were incorrect The correct value is 520 ugAg All other CRQLs were reported correctly Hie laboratory was contacted and a corrected Form I was resubmitted

Very truly yours

can Federal Programs Cor

Rigassio CLP Lead Chemist

John Walker

TES V Regional Mcinager

Enclosures

cc D Szaro US EPA Region I Deputy Project Officer

MOTTOLO CASE 11766

TABLE I - RECOMMENDATI(raquoJS SUMMARY

TR NoS BN Acid PestPCB

AP751 A AP752 A AP753 A AP753RE J NA AP754 A A AP755 A A AP756 A AP757 A AP758 R A AP759 AA AP760 AA AP761 AA AP762 AA AP763 AA AP764 AA AP765 AA AP766 A A

- Accept all data

- Accept but estimate all benzyl alcohol results due to calibration

bull results --bullbull- 3 3 -- 3~- -I-

J - Estimate positive results (J) and reject nondetect results (R) due to poor surrogate recoveries

- Reject all nondetect results due to excessive holding time

MOTTOLO CASE 11766

TABLE II - TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUND (TIC) SUMMARY

TIC AP753 AP756 AP757 AP762

2-Chloro-ethanol phosphate X

2-Butoxy-ethanol phosphate X X

3-Hydroxy-3-methy1-2-Heptanone

Sulfur X

X - conpound was detected

Data Sumnary Key

A - Acceptable data

J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity

R - Reject data due to quality control criteria exceeded Itie data are vinusable (conpound may or may not be present) Resanpling and reanalysis is necessary for verification

U - The conpound was analyzed for but considered not detected The associated nvimerical value is the sanple quantitation limit

UJ - The conpovind was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is an estimated queintity

The conpound was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is the same as the CRQL presented

iMyenl l l4t i lsect i^Jtaut fdgt4lHt

SITCiWIlOU)

CXlM7M

VMU I K t I l I M i u m i M W ItNMTOn W I K I

M i t i i ^ n

a m m

PIIIMI t l l O - O i l o r o t t t t l l i t b t r ] -CI i lvoraquoMml 13-laquoichl( ro6Mim l t - h c H l v a M u m bull n o t bull lc (o l I M i c b l o r g k M i n t MMbr lpAx io l l l l l - C l i l o r g i U ( r w r l l t i t e r laquo-laquotkr l ) tlaquo i io l

bullHl l t m - l i - t t - t r f l f Tl M l te H n i U l o r o r t t i w gt i l r laquo w i f M I t teteroH 2 - l i l r t egt iM l 2laquo-HteltJlritteMl teuolc k l lt l i i l K H I o r o t t k a T l w I t e w 2laquo- l lcMaroraquol iml l gtlaquo-Tr icMiroteUMt bull V l i t i u l i o t bull - O l o r o a i l l M

Ik iac l i lgroty t te i iw

laquo - a i o r a - ] H M t r t ^ n gt gt 2-i inkriupniuiM Hnlaquok la rKyltgt te te t te ln i laquo t - T r i c l l i r e i t e M l gtlaquogt-lricklarapliMOl 2 -O i l e rmpMk l l iM 2 - i t r M gt i l i M t i t e t t r l ^ k t l u l M l k m o k l k y l n t 2 t - h i i t r oltD lMM SHHtroMi l i te bullCHip t tkMI 2 laquo - l i a i t r ^ l laquo l 4-1)1 trspMMl DiktezsfvM 2 lt - | i i i t r o to lGn t D i i t k r I i t t k i l a U - a i l i i f l m j l - f t ea r l r tw r F l u r n lt - lt i l r o laquo l l l u 4 t~ t i i i t rQ- l - IMk | lraquoklaquo io l gt - lt l t m t e i p t e l i [ l i laquo i t e l l l v l gt M H k i i | l - W w laquo t l laquo l t e r teitcklorteteitei Ptetaik lorwteMl H i M M t t r i n teUrute h - raquo ^ t i r l p M k t l i U F l t e r M t t e n r r r laquo t W f t t M i r l ^ t t e l a t o ] - t i c k | g r o k i u l 4 i w l n i o ( t l t e t k r a c i M ttryw l i l ( I - laquo n T l t e l y I I raquo t t t lt I l l l M - n c t gt l f M K l l i t gt i M i i l t l f l M r a t k M taiiolklMterMttM m n d l a r r M f l t e laquo o ( l 2 gt - M i t r M t gt i k ( u U b l M t k r K M t N H ( | k l l p laquo T l m

cm

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IC 10 10 10 JO M 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 M 10 K 10 10 10

w 10 K 30 10 10 10 10 10 N

raquo10 10 10 90 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

M - H W - l l t oii-4ta l lraquo-4tl n- in laquo-4 M-ISI m-vsa S I S-II laquo-nt (bull-101 M

laquoraquo7S1 raquo raquo t u n tflSlK raquoHM u m i r 3 ) 4P731 bull f IS I HUH bull f 7 U ltri9 m u IMOtM] motMi bullWOtMl NOOklH IIOOtM) nookioi 81004101 81004(10 81O0MI4 MOOHD noOMU bull W O M O l

msBSWflSBIBB^ flWSWBBSIISft

10 U 10 IU 10 IU low 10 IU 10 IM 10 IU 10 U 10 IU

u

3i

U

4 J

I I

gt bull 9 BMWM WMM St fV AS f l

DiuniM Ficnai 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MTf M V U t t 4M0I1 4 i a f n laquo2on 4 20n 4 i i a i 42011 41101 41111 42l)laquo1 42481 42011 42081 42011 MFE HTMCTa 421n 421n 421at 32411 42111 4 21 i l 32tS1 3 j4ai 421H 421B1 42181 42181 42181 MFC t M l T I U t S l raquo laquo 5nn 32319 32411 32311 324W 32481 52411 32581 32581 52381 32381 32481

I SMivslJtili Sdi l u l p i i

i rc i ion iu

itt7M

SMgtU UCITIOiI^AirU Rl EAiru u a a

Wrmvim CKH

Phtnol 330

Igt f ( 3 - Q i l v s r t i i r l ) t t t i i r 330

I 2-OiIworaquoli(Ofll 330 lJ-OicraquoiloraStoeJraquo 330

raquo - D j c M x o t n 2 t M 330

Bcnjyl AUotel 330

l 2 -D icUor f tSraquo fraquo t 330 I| 2 - l l t th r l f lMMl 330 I

I t il2- tk laro i^^f l l i thir 330 4-ltltthTlplIieMl 330 l lHIitroso-ti-a-prgprluini 330 Hiilaquochlcrottkat 330

I litrobe8znt 330 IsophvoM 330 2-ll itrevtanl 330 2lt-DiMtftrlraquotaraquoI 330

I Btaioic lcilt liOO t i tfJ-OUoriaUoiTintbjnf 330 2laquo-(icklarovlgtiael 330 124-Trirtloroktaine 330 IUphth4ltet 330

I I

4-Oilaroiiiiliot 330 HtKchloratotidinf 330 4-DilorB-3-)lftiTlfol 330 -lltthrltMp(itliIegtt 330 Htiiclil9rocrIopt9tidien( 330 24t-Trict l i rKlno 330 24i-Triioraeraquosl 1400 2-Oilergai^tbilcGlaquo 330 - laquo i t r 3 raquo i l i M liOO S iMthr lpt t lu l lU 330

I AcnapbUrlat 330 2amp-gtigtitrgtBlaw 330 JHI i t roMil iM UOO Dccnipkttnf 330

I I

24-DiaitrapOBol ItOO 4 - laquo t r e 0 n s i liOO Dibauef iru 330 2 - t i t i t n i B l a B i 330 l i t tb r lpk tk i l i te 330 4-ailoreli(arl-IVarlcthtr 330 H u r t M 330 laquo - l i t roau l iM 1600 46-Dicitre-2-flrtkrlpgtilaquonol 1600

I I

bull-bull i t rnadi tasr laa iHl l l 330 l -arotor tanl- tanl tUer 330 IhxKblBrgbmai 330 gtntipoundUargptageI 1600 Pb is t fUrot 330 RBthrxtM 330 Bi-laquo-tatTl|MbillaquoU 330 f l u r o U B c 330 P r t M 334

I I

ktYlbecTlpMkil j tc 330 33-eictlarg6f(Ki4iBr 660 Bn io la lc tUr t fnc 330 Oirytem 330 B i t (2- t tkTlknrn| l i t l i i l i t t 330Di-ii-laquoctrlpttbtllaquott 330 B tMon i l l a r iaUcM 330 lBU0(k) l lHr iBaat 334 Rnze(laquo)nm( 330 l i a taeH2 3 -a n r tn 330 Biktalak)jsUrltctgf 330

S-6 S-] S-13 S-t t t m raquo m laquoP7i2 AP7i3

430 IM UO IU 320 UJ JBO UJ

210 J

x = sssx rsslaquosTsssH=ssx i i cs s=saslaquossss3 ies r=3x3sssrsxxsxlaquox=5=s ssaxsssxs ts=

(IIUTIIM FtCT0lll2 MLUTICM FlaquoCTDIt0 IlLUTIOH FACTO) 11 DlUITin FACTOR 10

DATE EITtlaquoCTEl)4278f MTE EITRACTED42689 MTE EITRACTES42789 MTE EITmCTEII42689

MTE MULr2Egt32389 MTE AMLy2EIS2S89 MTE IWLgt2Egt-S2S89 MTE AMUrZECS238f

MTE SMmai42089 NTE SAIinpoundS424n MTE SlaquoMgtIED420B9 MTE SMinE042OBf

331 Noistari SOI I to i t tu r i 401 Hoit turt 431 h i i t u r t

I

PesticidePCB Aoueous Analysis

SITEtHOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAMgtLE NUHBER SANPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugL

CONPOUNDssss=ssss=sss=sss=s===ss

alpha-BHC

beta-BtC delta-BHC

gaMa-K4C (Lindane) Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor Epoiide

Endosulfan I

Die ldr in

44--DDE Endrin

Endosulfan I I

44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin Ketone

alpha-Chlordane gaua-Chlordane

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124a

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

DILUTION FACTORDATE SAMPLEDDATE EmACTEDDATE ANALYZED

CRQL

005 005 005

005 005

005 005 005

010

010

010

010

010

010 010

05 010

005 005 10

005 005 005

005

005

10 10

fiP751 AP752 AP753 AP754 AP755 AP757 AP758 AP759 AP760 AP764 AP765 AP766

HW-BS HM-13D Qli-4SR NH-ISD S-6 H0-3SR N03SRD S-3 S-13 HN-l lD NN-lOl S-9

l l l l l l l l l l l l 4 lB 418 419 419 420 419 419 420 420 420 420 420

421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 529 529 530 550 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

MOTTOLO CASE 11766

TABLE I - RECOMMENDATI(raquoJS SUMMARY

TR NoS BN Acid PestPCB

AP751 A AP752 A AP753 A AP753RE J NA AP754 A A AP755 A A AP756 A AP757 A AP758 R A AP759 AA AP760 AA AP761 AA AP762 AA AP763 AA AP764 AA AP765 AA AP766 A A

- Accept all data

- Accept but estimate all benzyl alcohol results due to calibration

bull results --bullbull- 3 3 -- 3~- -I-

J - Estimate positive results (J) and reject nondetect results (R) due to poor surrogate recoveries

- Reject all nondetect results due to excessive holding time

MOTTOLO CASE 11766

TABLE II - TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUND (TIC) SUMMARY

TIC AP753 AP756 AP757 AP762

2-Chloro-ethanol phosphate X

2-Butoxy-ethanol phosphate X X

3-Hydroxy-3-methy1-2-Heptanone

Sulfur X

X - conpound was detected

Data Sumnary Key

A - Acceptable data

J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity

R - Reject data due to quality control criteria exceeded Itie data are vinusable (conpound may or may not be present) Resanpling and reanalysis is necessary for verification

U - The conpound was analyzed for but considered not detected The associated nvimerical value is the sanple quantitation limit

UJ - The conpovind was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is an estimated queintity

The conpound was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is the same as the CRQL presented

iMyenl l l4t i lsect i^Jtaut fdgt4lHt

SITCiWIlOU)

CXlM7M

VMU I K t I l I M i u m i M W ItNMTOn W I K I

M i t i i ^ n

a m m

PIIIMI t l l O - O i l o r o t t t t l l i t b t r ] -CI i lvoraquoMml 13-laquoichl( ro6Mim l t - h c H l v a M u m bull n o t bull lc (o l I M i c b l o r g k M i n t MMbr lpAx io l l l l l - C l i l o r g i U ( r w r l l t i t e r laquo-laquotkr l ) tlaquo i io l

bullHl l t m - l i - t t - t r f l f Tl M l te H n i U l o r o r t t i w gt i l r laquo w i f M I t teteroH 2 - l i l r t egt iM l 2laquo-HteltJlritteMl teuolc k l lt l i i l K H I o r o t t k a T l w I t e w 2laquo- l lcMaroraquol iml l gtlaquo-Tr icMiroteUMt bull V l i t i u l i o t bull - O l o r o a i l l M

Ik iac l i lgroty t te i iw

laquo - a i o r a - ] H M t r t ^ n gt gt 2-i inkriupniuiM Hnlaquok la rKyltgt te te t te ln i laquo t - T r i c l l i r e i t e M l gtlaquogt-lricklarapliMOl 2 -O i l e rmpMk l l iM 2 - i t r M gt i l i M t i t e t t r l ^ k t l u l M l k m o k l k y l n t 2 t - h i i t r oltD lMM SHHtroMi l i te bullCHip t tkMI 2 laquo - l i a i t r ^ l laquo l 4-1)1 trspMMl DiktezsfvM 2 lt - | i i i t r o to lGn t D i i t k r I i t t k i l a U - a i l i i f l m j l - f t ea r l r tw r F l u r n lt - lt i l r o laquo l l l u 4 t~ t i i i t rQ- l - IMk | lraquoklaquo io l gt - lt l t m t e i p t e l i [ l i laquo i t e l l l v l gt M H k i i | l - W w laquo t l laquo l t e r teitcklorteteitei Ptetaik lorwteMl H i M M t t r i n teUrute h - raquo ^ t i r l p M k t l i U F l t e r M t t e n r r r laquo t W f t t M i r l ^ t t e l a t o ] - t i c k | g r o k i u l 4 i w l n i o ( t l t e t k r a c i M ttryw l i l ( I - laquo n T l t e l y I I raquo t t t lt I l l l M - n c t gt l f M K l l i t gt i M i i l t l f l M r a t k M taiiolklMterMttM m n d l a r r M f l t e laquo o ( l 2 gt - M i t r M t gt i k ( u U b l M t k r K M t N H ( | k l l p laquo T l m

cm

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IC 10 10 10 JO M 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 M 10 K 10 10 10

w 10 K 30 10 10 10 10 10 N

raquo10 10 10 90 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

M - H W - l l t oii-4ta l lraquo-4tl n- in laquo-4 M-ISI m-vsa S I S-II laquo-nt (bull-101 M

laquoraquo7S1 raquo raquo t u n tflSlK raquoHM u m i r 3 ) 4P731 bull f IS I HUH bull f 7 U ltri9 m u IMOtM] motMi bullWOtMl NOOklH IIOOtM) nookioi 81004101 81004(10 81O0MI4 MOOHD noOMU bull W O M O l

msBSWflSBIBB^ flWSWBBSIISft

10 U 10 IU 10 IU low 10 IU 10 IM 10 IU 10 U 10 IU

u

3i

U

4 J

I I

gt bull 9 BMWM WMM St fV AS f l

DiuniM Ficnai 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MTf M V U t t 4M0I1 4 i a f n laquo2on 4 20n 4 i i a i 42011 41101 41111 42l)laquo1 42481 42011 42081 42011 MFE HTMCTa 421n 421n 421at 32411 42111 4 21 i l 32tS1 3 j4ai 421H 421B1 42181 42181 42181 MFC t M l T I U t S l raquo laquo 5nn 32319 32411 32311 324W 32481 52411 32581 32581 52381 32381 32481

I SMivslJtili Sdi l u l p i i

i rc i ion iu

itt7M

SMgtU UCITIOiI^AirU Rl EAiru u a a

Wrmvim CKH

Phtnol 330

Igt f ( 3 - Q i l v s r t i i r l ) t t t i i r 330

I 2-OiIworaquoli(Ofll 330 lJ-OicraquoiloraStoeJraquo 330

raquo - D j c M x o t n 2 t M 330

Bcnjyl AUotel 330

l 2 -D icUor f tSraquo fraquo t 330 I| 2 - l l t th r l f lMMl 330 I

I t il2- tk laro i^^f l l i thir 330 4-ltltthTlplIieMl 330 l lHIitroso-ti-a-prgprluini 330 Hiilaquochlcrottkat 330

I litrobe8znt 330 IsophvoM 330 2-ll itrevtanl 330 2lt-DiMtftrlraquotaraquoI 330

I Btaioic lcilt liOO t i tfJ-OUoriaUoiTintbjnf 330 2laquo-(icklarovlgtiael 330 124-Trirtloroktaine 330 IUphth4ltet 330

I I

4-Oilaroiiiiliot 330 HtKchloratotidinf 330 4-DilorB-3-)lftiTlfol 330 -lltthrltMp(itliIegtt 330 Htiiclil9rocrIopt9tidien( 330 24t-Trict l i rKlno 330 24i-Triioraeraquosl 1400 2-Oilergai^tbilcGlaquo 330 - laquo i t r 3 raquo i l i M liOO S iMthr lpt t lu l lU 330

I AcnapbUrlat 330 2amp-gtigtitrgtBlaw 330 JHI i t roMil iM UOO Dccnipkttnf 330

I I

24-DiaitrapOBol ItOO 4 - laquo t r e 0 n s i liOO Dibauef iru 330 2 - t i t i t n i B l a B i 330 l i t tb r lpk tk i l i te 330 4-ailoreli(arl-IVarlcthtr 330 H u r t M 330 laquo - l i t roau l iM 1600 46-Dicitre-2-flrtkrlpgtilaquonol 1600

I I

bull-bull i t rnadi tasr laa iHl l l 330 l -arotor tanl- tanl tUer 330 IhxKblBrgbmai 330 gtntipoundUargptageI 1600 Pb is t fUrot 330 RBthrxtM 330 Bi-laquo-tatTl|MbillaquoU 330 f l u r o U B c 330 P r t M 334

I I

ktYlbecTlpMkil j tc 330 33-eictlarg6f(Ki4iBr 660 Bn io la lc tUr t fnc 330 Oirytem 330 B i t (2- t tkTlknrn| l i t l i i l i t t 330Di-ii-laquoctrlpttbtllaquott 330 B tMon i l l a r iaUcM 330 lBU0(k) l lHr iBaat 334 Rnze(laquo)nm( 330 l i a taeH2 3 -a n r tn 330 Biktalak)jsUrltctgf 330

S-6 S-] S-13 S-t t t m raquo m laquoP7i2 AP7i3

430 IM UO IU 320 UJ JBO UJ

210 J

x = sssx rsslaquosTsssH=ssx i i cs s=saslaquossss3 ies r=3x3sssrsxxsxlaquox=5=s ssaxsssxs ts=

(IIUTIIM FtCT0lll2 MLUTICM FlaquoCTDIt0 IlLUTIOH FACTO) 11 DlUITin FACTOR 10

DATE EITtlaquoCTEl)4278f MTE EITRACTED42689 MTE EITRACTES42789 MTE EITmCTEII42689

MTE MULr2Egt32389 MTE AMLy2EIS2S89 MTE IWLgt2Egt-S2S89 MTE AMUrZECS238f

MTE SMmai42089 NTE SAIinpoundS424n MTE SlaquoMgtIED420B9 MTE SMinE042OBf

331 Noistari SOI I to i t tu r i 401 Hoit turt 431 h i i t u r t

I

PesticidePCB Aoueous Analysis

SITEtHOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAMgtLE NUHBER SANPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugL

CONPOUNDssss=ssss=sss=sss=s===ss

alpha-BHC

beta-BtC delta-BHC

gaMa-K4C (Lindane) Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor Epoiide

Endosulfan I

Die ldr in

44--DDE Endrin

Endosulfan I I

44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin Ketone

alpha-Chlordane gaua-Chlordane

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124a

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

DILUTION FACTORDATE SAMPLEDDATE EmACTEDDATE ANALYZED

CRQL

005 005 005

005 005

005 005 005

010

010

010

010

010

010 010

05 010

005 005 10

005 005 005

005

005

10 10

fiP751 AP752 AP753 AP754 AP755 AP757 AP758 AP759 AP760 AP764 AP765 AP766

HW-BS HM-13D Qli-4SR NH-ISD S-6 H0-3SR N03SRD S-3 S-13 HN-l lD NN-lOl S-9

l l l l l l l l l l l l 4 lB 418 419 419 420 419 419 420 420 420 420 420

421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 529 529 530 550 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

MOTTOLO CASE 11766

TABLE II - TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUND (TIC) SUMMARY

TIC AP753 AP756 AP757 AP762

2-Chloro-ethanol phosphate X

2-Butoxy-ethanol phosphate X X

3-Hydroxy-3-methy1-2-Heptanone

Sulfur X

X - conpound was detected

Data Sumnary Key

A - Acceptable data

J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity

R - Reject data due to quality control criteria exceeded Itie data are vinusable (conpound may or may not be present) Resanpling and reanalysis is necessary for verification

U - The conpound was analyzed for but considered not detected The associated nvimerical value is the sanple quantitation limit

UJ - The conpovind was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is an estimated queintity

The conpound was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is the same as the CRQL presented

iMyenl l l4t i lsect i^Jtaut fdgt4lHt

SITCiWIlOU)

CXlM7M

VMU I K t I l I M i u m i M W ItNMTOn W I K I

M i t i i ^ n

a m m

PIIIMI t l l O - O i l o r o t t t t l l i t b t r ] -CI i lvoraquoMml 13-laquoichl( ro6Mim l t - h c H l v a M u m bull n o t bull lc (o l I M i c b l o r g k M i n t MMbr lpAx io l l l l l - C l i l o r g i U ( r w r l l t i t e r laquo-laquotkr l ) tlaquo i io l

bullHl l t m - l i - t t - t r f l f Tl M l te H n i U l o r o r t t i w gt i l r laquo w i f M I t teteroH 2 - l i l r t egt iM l 2laquo-HteltJlritteMl teuolc k l lt l i i l K H I o r o t t k a T l w I t e w 2laquo- l lcMaroraquol iml l gtlaquo-Tr icMiroteUMt bull V l i t i u l i o t bull - O l o r o a i l l M

Ik iac l i lgroty t te i iw

laquo - a i o r a - ] H M t r t ^ n gt gt 2-i inkriupniuiM Hnlaquok la rKyltgt te te t te ln i laquo t - T r i c l l i r e i t e M l gtlaquogt-lricklarapliMOl 2 -O i l e rmpMk l l iM 2 - i t r M gt i l i M t i t e t t r l ^ k t l u l M l k m o k l k y l n t 2 t - h i i t r oltD lMM SHHtroMi l i te bullCHip t tkMI 2 laquo - l i a i t r ^ l laquo l 4-1)1 trspMMl DiktezsfvM 2 lt - | i i i t r o to lGn t D i i t k r I i t t k i l a U - a i l i i f l m j l - f t ea r l r tw r F l u r n lt - lt i l r o laquo l l l u 4 t~ t i i i t rQ- l - IMk | lraquoklaquo io l gt - lt l t m t e i p t e l i [ l i laquo i t e l l l v l gt M H k i i | l - W w laquo t l laquo l t e r teitcklorteteitei Ptetaik lorwteMl H i M M t t r i n teUrute h - raquo ^ t i r l p M k t l i U F l t e r M t t e n r r r laquo t W f t t M i r l ^ t t e l a t o ] - t i c k | g r o k i u l 4 i w l n i o ( t l t e t k r a c i M ttryw l i l ( I - laquo n T l t e l y I I raquo t t t lt I l l l M - n c t gt l f M K l l i t gt i M i i l t l f l M r a t k M taiiolklMterMttM m n d l a r r M f l t e laquo o ( l 2 gt - M i t r M t gt i k ( u U b l M t k r K M t N H ( | k l l p laquo T l m

cm

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IC 10 10 10 JO M 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 M 10 K 10 10 10

w 10 K 30 10 10 10 10 10 N

raquo10 10 10 90 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

M - H W - l l t oii-4ta l lraquo-4tl n- in laquo-4 M-ISI m-vsa S I S-II laquo-nt (bull-101 M

laquoraquo7S1 raquo raquo t u n tflSlK raquoHM u m i r 3 ) 4P731 bull f IS I HUH bull f 7 U ltri9 m u IMOtM] motMi bullWOtMl NOOklH IIOOtM) nookioi 81004101 81004(10 81O0MI4 MOOHD noOMU bull W O M O l

msBSWflSBIBB^ flWSWBBSIISft

10 U 10 IU 10 IU low 10 IU 10 IM 10 IU 10 U 10 IU

u

3i

U

4 J

I I

gt bull 9 BMWM WMM St fV AS f l

DiuniM Ficnai 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MTf M V U t t 4M0I1 4 i a f n laquo2on 4 20n 4 i i a i 42011 41101 41111 42l)laquo1 42481 42011 42081 42011 MFE HTMCTa 421n 421n 421at 32411 42111 4 21 i l 32tS1 3 j4ai 421H 421B1 42181 42181 42181 MFC t M l T I U t S l raquo laquo 5nn 32319 32411 32311 324W 32481 52411 32581 32581 52381 32381 32481

I SMivslJtili Sdi l u l p i i

i rc i ion iu

itt7M

SMgtU UCITIOiI^AirU Rl EAiru u a a

Wrmvim CKH

Phtnol 330

Igt f ( 3 - Q i l v s r t i i r l ) t t t i i r 330

I 2-OiIworaquoli(Ofll 330 lJ-OicraquoiloraStoeJraquo 330

raquo - D j c M x o t n 2 t M 330

Bcnjyl AUotel 330

l 2 -D icUor f tSraquo fraquo t 330 I| 2 - l l t th r l f lMMl 330 I

I t il2- tk laro i^^f l l i thir 330 4-ltltthTlplIieMl 330 l lHIitroso-ti-a-prgprluini 330 Hiilaquochlcrottkat 330

I litrobe8znt 330 IsophvoM 330 2-ll itrevtanl 330 2lt-DiMtftrlraquotaraquoI 330

I Btaioic lcilt liOO t i tfJ-OUoriaUoiTintbjnf 330 2laquo-(icklarovlgtiael 330 124-Trirtloroktaine 330 IUphth4ltet 330

I I

4-Oilaroiiiiliot 330 HtKchloratotidinf 330 4-DilorB-3-)lftiTlfol 330 -lltthrltMp(itliIegtt 330 Htiiclil9rocrIopt9tidien( 330 24t-Trict l i rKlno 330 24i-Triioraeraquosl 1400 2-Oilergai^tbilcGlaquo 330 - laquo i t r 3 raquo i l i M liOO S iMthr lpt t lu l lU 330

I AcnapbUrlat 330 2amp-gtigtitrgtBlaw 330 JHI i t roMil iM UOO Dccnipkttnf 330

I I

24-DiaitrapOBol ItOO 4 - laquo t r e 0 n s i liOO Dibauef iru 330 2 - t i t i t n i B l a B i 330 l i t tb r lpk tk i l i te 330 4-ailoreli(arl-IVarlcthtr 330 H u r t M 330 laquo - l i t roau l iM 1600 46-Dicitre-2-flrtkrlpgtilaquonol 1600

I I

bull-bull i t rnadi tasr laa iHl l l 330 l -arotor tanl- tanl tUer 330 IhxKblBrgbmai 330 gtntipoundUargptageI 1600 Pb is t fUrot 330 RBthrxtM 330 Bi-laquo-tatTl|MbillaquoU 330 f l u r o U B c 330 P r t M 334

I I

ktYlbecTlpMkil j tc 330 33-eictlarg6f(Ki4iBr 660 Bn io la lc tUr t fnc 330 Oirytem 330 B i t (2- t tkTlknrn| l i t l i i l i t t 330Di-ii-laquoctrlpttbtllaquott 330 B tMon i l l a r iaUcM 330 lBU0(k) l lHr iBaat 334 Rnze(laquo)nm( 330 l i a taeH2 3 -a n r tn 330 Biktalak)jsUrltctgf 330

S-6 S-] S-13 S-t t t m raquo m laquoP7i2 AP7i3

430 IM UO IU 320 UJ JBO UJ

210 J

x = sssx rsslaquosTsssH=ssx i i cs s=saslaquossss3 ies r=3x3sssrsxxsxlaquox=5=s ssaxsssxs ts=

(IIUTIIM FtCT0lll2 MLUTICM FlaquoCTDIt0 IlLUTIOH FACTO) 11 DlUITin FACTOR 10

DATE EITtlaquoCTEl)4278f MTE EITRACTED42689 MTE EITRACTES42789 MTE EITmCTEII42689

MTE MULr2Egt32389 MTE AMLy2EIS2S89 MTE IWLgt2Egt-S2S89 MTE AMUrZECS238f

MTE SMmai42089 NTE SAIinpoundS424n MTE SlaquoMgtIED420B9 MTE SMinE042OBf

331 Noistari SOI I to i t tu r i 401 Hoit turt 431 h i i t u r t

I

PesticidePCB Aoueous Analysis

SITEtHOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAMgtLE NUHBER SANPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugL

CONPOUNDssss=ssss=sss=sss=s===ss

alpha-BHC

beta-BtC delta-BHC

gaMa-K4C (Lindane) Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor Epoiide

Endosulfan I

Die ldr in

44--DDE Endrin

Endosulfan I I

44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin Ketone

alpha-Chlordane gaua-Chlordane

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124a

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

DILUTION FACTORDATE SAMPLEDDATE EmACTEDDATE ANALYZED

CRQL

005 005 005

005 005

005 005 005

010

010

010

010

010

010 010

05 010

005 005 10

005 005 005

005

005

10 10

fiP751 AP752 AP753 AP754 AP755 AP757 AP758 AP759 AP760 AP764 AP765 AP766

HW-BS HM-13D Qli-4SR NH-ISD S-6 H0-3SR N03SRD S-3 S-13 HN-l lD NN-lOl S-9

l l l l l l l l l l l l 4 lB 418 419 419 420 419 419 420 420 420 420 420

421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 529 529 530 550 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

Data Sumnary Key

A - Acceptable data

J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity

R - Reject data due to quality control criteria exceeded Itie data are vinusable (conpound may or may not be present) Resanpling and reanalysis is necessary for verification

U - The conpound was analyzed for but considered not detected The associated nvimerical value is the sanple quantitation limit

UJ - The conpovind was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is an estimated queintity

The conpound was analyzed for but was not detected The sanple quantitation limit is the same as the CRQL presented

iMyenl l l4t i lsect i^Jtaut fdgt4lHt

SITCiWIlOU)

CXlM7M

VMU I K t I l I M i u m i M W ItNMTOn W I K I

M i t i i ^ n

a m m

PIIIMI t l l O - O i l o r o t t t t l l i t b t r ] -CI i lvoraquoMml 13-laquoichl( ro6Mim l t - h c H l v a M u m bull n o t bull lc (o l I M i c b l o r g k M i n t MMbr lpAx io l l l l l - C l i l o r g i U ( r w r l l t i t e r laquo-laquotkr l ) tlaquo i io l

bullHl l t m - l i - t t - t r f l f Tl M l te H n i U l o r o r t t i w gt i l r laquo w i f M I t teteroH 2 - l i l r t egt iM l 2laquo-HteltJlritteMl teuolc k l lt l i i l K H I o r o t t k a T l w I t e w 2laquo- l lcMaroraquol iml l gtlaquo-Tr icMiroteUMt bull V l i t i u l i o t bull - O l o r o a i l l M

Ik iac l i lgroty t te i iw

laquo - a i o r a - ] H M t r t ^ n gt gt 2-i inkriupniuiM Hnlaquok la rKyltgt te te t te ln i laquo t - T r i c l l i r e i t e M l gtlaquogt-lricklarapliMOl 2 -O i l e rmpMk l l iM 2 - i t r M gt i l i M t i t e t t r l ^ k t l u l M l k m o k l k y l n t 2 t - h i i t r oltD lMM SHHtroMi l i te bullCHip t tkMI 2 laquo - l i a i t r ^ l laquo l 4-1)1 trspMMl DiktezsfvM 2 lt - | i i i t r o to lGn t D i i t k r I i t t k i l a U - a i l i i f l m j l - f t ea r l r tw r F l u r n lt - lt i l r o laquo l l l u 4 t~ t i i i t rQ- l - IMk | lraquoklaquo io l gt - lt l t m t e i p t e l i [ l i laquo i t e l l l v l gt M H k i i | l - W w laquo t l laquo l t e r teitcklorteteitei Ptetaik lorwteMl H i M M t t r i n teUrute h - raquo ^ t i r l p M k t l i U F l t e r M t t e n r r r laquo t W f t t M i r l ^ t t e l a t o ] - t i c k | g r o k i u l 4 i w l n i o ( t l t e t k r a c i M ttryw l i l ( I - laquo n T l t e l y I I raquo t t t lt I l l l M - n c t gt l f M K l l i t gt i M i i l t l f l M r a t k M taiiolklMterMttM m n d l a r r M f l t e laquo o ( l 2 gt - M i t r M t gt i k ( u U b l M t k r K M t N H ( | k l l p laquo T l m

cm

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IC 10 10 10 JO M 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 M 10 K 10 10 10

w 10 K 30 10 10 10 10 10 N

raquo10 10 10 90 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

M - H W - l l t oii-4ta l lraquo-4tl n- in laquo-4 M-ISI m-vsa S I S-II laquo-nt (bull-101 M

laquoraquo7S1 raquo raquo t u n tflSlK raquoHM u m i r 3 ) 4P731 bull f IS I HUH bull f 7 U ltri9 m u IMOtM] motMi bullWOtMl NOOklH IIOOtM) nookioi 81004101 81004(10 81O0MI4 MOOHD noOMU bull W O M O l

msBSWflSBIBB^ flWSWBBSIISft

10 U 10 IU 10 IU low 10 IU 10 IM 10 IU 10 U 10 IU

u

3i

U

4 J

I I

gt bull 9 BMWM WMM St fV AS f l

DiuniM Ficnai 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MTf M V U t t 4M0I1 4 i a f n laquo2on 4 20n 4 i i a i 42011 41101 41111 42l)laquo1 42481 42011 42081 42011 MFE HTMCTa 421n 421n 421at 32411 42111 4 21 i l 32tS1 3 j4ai 421H 421B1 42181 42181 42181 MFC t M l T I U t S l raquo laquo 5nn 32319 32411 32311 324W 32481 52411 32581 32581 52381 32381 32481

I SMivslJtili Sdi l u l p i i

i rc i ion iu

itt7M

SMgtU UCITIOiI^AirU Rl EAiru u a a

Wrmvim CKH

Phtnol 330

Igt f ( 3 - Q i l v s r t i i r l ) t t t i i r 330

I 2-OiIworaquoli(Ofll 330 lJ-OicraquoiloraStoeJraquo 330

raquo - D j c M x o t n 2 t M 330

Bcnjyl AUotel 330

l 2 -D icUor f tSraquo fraquo t 330 I| 2 - l l t th r l f lMMl 330 I

I t il2- tk laro i^^f l l i thir 330 4-ltltthTlplIieMl 330 l lHIitroso-ti-a-prgprluini 330 Hiilaquochlcrottkat 330

I litrobe8znt 330 IsophvoM 330 2-ll itrevtanl 330 2lt-DiMtftrlraquotaraquoI 330

I Btaioic lcilt liOO t i tfJ-OUoriaUoiTintbjnf 330 2laquo-(icklarovlgtiael 330 124-Trirtloroktaine 330 IUphth4ltet 330

I I

4-Oilaroiiiiliot 330 HtKchloratotidinf 330 4-DilorB-3-)lftiTlfol 330 -lltthrltMp(itliIegtt 330 Htiiclil9rocrIopt9tidien( 330 24t-Trict l i rKlno 330 24i-Triioraeraquosl 1400 2-Oilergai^tbilcGlaquo 330 - laquo i t r 3 raquo i l i M liOO S iMthr lpt t lu l lU 330

I AcnapbUrlat 330 2amp-gtigtitrgtBlaw 330 JHI i t roMil iM UOO Dccnipkttnf 330

I I

24-DiaitrapOBol ItOO 4 - laquo t r e 0 n s i liOO Dibauef iru 330 2 - t i t i t n i B l a B i 330 l i t tb r lpk tk i l i te 330 4-ailoreli(arl-IVarlcthtr 330 H u r t M 330 laquo - l i t roau l iM 1600 46-Dicitre-2-flrtkrlpgtilaquonol 1600

I I

bull-bull i t rnadi tasr laa iHl l l 330 l -arotor tanl- tanl tUer 330 IhxKblBrgbmai 330 gtntipoundUargptageI 1600 Pb is t fUrot 330 RBthrxtM 330 Bi-laquo-tatTl|MbillaquoU 330 f l u r o U B c 330 P r t M 334

I I

ktYlbecTlpMkil j tc 330 33-eictlarg6f(Ki4iBr 660 Bn io la lc tUr t fnc 330 Oirytem 330 B i t (2- t tkTlknrn| l i t l i i l i t t 330Di-ii-laquoctrlpttbtllaquott 330 B tMon i l l a r iaUcM 330 lBU0(k) l lHr iBaat 334 Rnze(laquo)nm( 330 l i a taeH2 3 -a n r tn 330 Biktalak)jsUrltctgf 330

S-6 S-] S-13 S-t t t m raquo m laquoP7i2 AP7i3

430 IM UO IU 320 UJ JBO UJ

210 J

x = sssx rsslaquosTsssH=ssx i i cs s=saslaquossss3 ies r=3x3sssrsxxsxlaquox=5=s ssaxsssxs ts=

(IIUTIIM FtCT0lll2 MLUTICM FlaquoCTDIt0 IlLUTIOH FACTO) 11 DlUITin FACTOR 10

DATE EITtlaquoCTEl)4278f MTE EITRACTED42689 MTE EITRACTES42789 MTE EITmCTEII42689

MTE MULr2Egt32389 MTE AMLy2EIS2S89 MTE IWLgt2Egt-S2S89 MTE AMUrZECS238f

MTE SMmai42089 NTE SAIinpoundS424n MTE SlaquoMgtIED420B9 MTE SMinE042OBf

331 Noistari SOI I to i t tu r i 401 Hoit turt 431 h i i t u r t

I

PesticidePCB Aoueous Analysis

SITEtHOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAMgtLE NUHBER SANPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugL

CONPOUNDssss=ssss=sss=sss=s===ss

alpha-BHC

beta-BtC delta-BHC

gaMa-K4C (Lindane) Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor Epoiide

Endosulfan I

Die ldr in

44--DDE Endrin

Endosulfan I I

44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin Ketone

alpha-Chlordane gaua-Chlordane

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124a

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

DILUTION FACTORDATE SAMPLEDDATE EmACTEDDATE ANALYZED

CRQL

005 005 005

005 005

005 005 005

010

010

010

010

010

010 010

05 010

005 005 10

005 005 005

005

005

10 10

fiP751 AP752 AP753 AP754 AP755 AP757 AP758 AP759 AP760 AP764 AP765 AP766

HW-BS HM-13D Qli-4SR NH-ISD S-6 H0-3SR N03SRD S-3 S-13 HN-l lD NN-lOl S-9

l l l l l l l l l l l l 4 lB 418 419 419 420 419 419 420 420 420 420 420

421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 529 529 530 550 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

iMyenl l l4t i lsect i^Jtaut fdgt4lHt

SITCiWIlOU)

CXlM7M

VMU I K t I l I M i u m i M W ItNMTOn W I K I

M i t i i ^ n

a m m

PIIIMI t l l O - O i l o r o t t t t l l i t b t r ] -CI i lvoraquoMml 13-laquoichl( ro6Mim l t - h c H l v a M u m bull n o t bull lc (o l I M i c b l o r g k M i n t MMbr lpAx io l l l l l - C l i l o r g i U ( r w r l l t i t e r laquo-laquotkr l ) tlaquo i io l

bullHl l t m - l i - t t - t r f l f Tl M l te H n i U l o r o r t t i w gt i l r laquo w i f M I t teteroH 2 - l i l r t egt iM l 2laquo-HteltJlritteMl teuolc k l lt l i i l K H I o r o t t k a T l w I t e w 2laquo- l lcMaroraquol iml l gtlaquo-Tr icMiroteUMt bull V l i t i u l i o t bull - O l o r o a i l l M

Ik iac l i lgroty t te i iw

laquo - a i o r a - ] H M t r t ^ n gt gt 2-i inkriupniuiM Hnlaquok la rKyltgt te te t te ln i laquo t - T r i c l l i r e i t e M l gtlaquogt-lricklarapliMOl 2 -O i l e rmpMk l l iM 2 - i t r M gt i l i M t i t e t t r l ^ k t l u l M l k m o k l k y l n t 2 t - h i i t r oltD lMM SHHtroMi l i te bullCHip t tkMI 2 laquo - l i a i t r ^ l laquo l 4-1)1 trspMMl DiktezsfvM 2 lt - | i i i t r o to lGn t D i i t k r I i t t k i l a U - a i l i i f l m j l - f t ea r l r tw r F l u r n lt - lt i l r o laquo l l l u 4 t~ t i i i t rQ- l - IMk | lraquoklaquo io l gt - lt l t m t e i p t e l i [ l i laquo i t e l l l v l gt M H k i i | l - W w laquo t l laquo l t e r teitcklorteteitei Ptetaik lorwteMl H i M M t t r i n teUrute h - raquo ^ t i r l p M k t l i U F l t e r M t t e n r r r laquo t W f t t M i r l ^ t t e l a t o ] - t i c k | g r o k i u l 4 i w l n i o ( t l t e t k r a c i M ttryw l i l ( I - laquo n T l t e l y I I raquo t t t lt I l l l M - n c t gt l f M K l l i t gt i M i i l t l f l M r a t k M taiiolklMterMttM m n d l a r r M f l t e laquo o ( l 2 gt - M i t r M t gt i k ( u U b l M t k r K M t N H ( | k l l p laquo T l m

cm

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IC 10 10 10 JO M 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 M 10 K 10 10 10

w 10 K 30 10 10 10 10 10 N

raquo10 10 10 90 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

M - H W - l l t oii-4ta l lraquo-4tl n- in laquo-4 M-ISI m-vsa S I S-II laquo-nt (bull-101 M

laquoraquo7S1 raquo raquo t u n tflSlK raquoHM u m i r 3 ) 4P731 bull f IS I HUH bull f 7 U ltri9 m u IMOtM] motMi bullWOtMl NOOklH IIOOtM) nookioi 81004101 81004(10 81O0MI4 MOOHD noOMU bull W O M O l

msBSWflSBIBB^ flWSWBBSIISft

10 U 10 IU 10 IU low 10 IU 10 IM 10 IU 10 U 10 IU

u

3i

U

4 J

I I

gt bull 9 BMWM WMM St fV AS f l

DiuniM Ficnai 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MTf M V U t t 4M0I1 4 i a f n laquo2on 4 20n 4 i i a i 42011 41101 41111 42l)laquo1 42481 42011 42081 42011 MFE HTMCTa 421n 421n 421at 32411 42111 4 21 i l 32tS1 3 j4ai 421H 421B1 42181 42181 42181 MFC t M l T I U t S l raquo laquo 5nn 32319 32411 32311 324W 32481 52411 32581 32581 52381 32381 32481

I SMivslJtili Sdi l u l p i i

i rc i ion iu

itt7M

SMgtU UCITIOiI^AirU Rl EAiru u a a

Wrmvim CKH

Phtnol 330

Igt f ( 3 - Q i l v s r t i i r l ) t t t i i r 330

I 2-OiIworaquoli(Ofll 330 lJ-OicraquoiloraStoeJraquo 330

raquo - D j c M x o t n 2 t M 330

Bcnjyl AUotel 330

l 2 -D icUor f tSraquo fraquo t 330 I| 2 - l l t th r l f lMMl 330 I

I t il2- tk laro i^^f l l i thir 330 4-ltltthTlplIieMl 330 l lHIitroso-ti-a-prgprluini 330 Hiilaquochlcrottkat 330

I litrobe8znt 330 IsophvoM 330 2-ll itrevtanl 330 2lt-DiMtftrlraquotaraquoI 330

I Btaioic lcilt liOO t i tfJ-OUoriaUoiTintbjnf 330 2laquo-(icklarovlgtiael 330 124-Trirtloroktaine 330 IUphth4ltet 330

I I

4-Oilaroiiiiliot 330 HtKchloratotidinf 330 4-DilorB-3-)lftiTlfol 330 -lltthrltMp(itliIegtt 330 Htiiclil9rocrIopt9tidien( 330 24t-Trict l i rKlno 330 24i-Triioraeraquosl 1400 2-Oilergai^tbilcGlaquo 330 - laquo i t r 3 raquo i l i M liOO S iMthr lpt t lu l lU 330

I AcnapbUrlat 330 2amp-gtigtitrgtBlaw 330 JHI i t roMil iM UOO Dccnipkttnf 330

I I

24-DiaitrapOBol ItOO 4 - laquo t r e 0 n s i liOO Dibauef iru 330 2 - t i t i t n i B l a B i 330 l i t tb r lpk tk i l i te 330 4-ailoreli(arl-IVarlcthtr 330 H u r t M 330 laquo - l i t roau l iM 1600 46-Dicitre-2-flrtkrlpgtilaquonol 1600

I I

bull-bull i t rnadi tasr laa iHl l l 330 l -arotor tanl- tanl tUer 330 IhxKblBrgbmai 330 gtntipoundUargptageI 1600 Pb is t fUrot 330 RBthrxtM 330 Bi-laquo-tatTl|MbillaquoU 330 f l u r o U B c 330 P r t M 334

I I

ktYlbecTlpMkil j tc 330 33-eictlarg6f(Ki4iBr 660 Bn io la lc tUr t fnc 330 Oirytem 330 B i t (2- t tkTlknrn| l i t l i i l i t t 330Di-ii-laquoctrlpttbtllaquott 330 B tMon i l l a r iaUcM 330 lBU0(k) l lHr iBaat 334 Rnze(laquo)nm( 330 l i a taeH2 3 -a n r tn 330 Biktalak)jsUrltctgf 330

S-6 S-] S-13 S-t t t m raquo m laquoP7i2 AP7i3

430 IM UO IU 320 UJ JBO UJ

210 J

x = sssx rsslaquosTsssH=ssx i i cs s=saslaquossss3 ies r=3x3sssrsxxsxlaquox=5=s ssaxsssxs ts=

(IIUTIIM FtCT0lll2 MLUTICM FlaquoCTDIt0 IlLUTIOH FACTO) 11 DlUITin FACTOR 10

DATE EITtlaquoCTEl)4278f MTE EITRACTED42689 MTE EITRACTES42789 MTE EITmCTEII42689

MTE MULr2Egt32389 MTE AMLy2EIS2S89 MTE IWLgt2Egt-S2S89 MTE AMUrZECS238f

MTE SMmai42089 NTE SAIinpoundS424n MTE SlaquoMgtIED420B9 MTE SMinE042OBf

331 Noistari SOI I to i t tu r i 401 Hoit turt 431 h i i t u r t

I

PesticidePCB Aoueous Analysis

SITEtHOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAMgtLE NUHBER SANPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugL

CONPOUNDssss=ssss=sss=sss=s===ss

alpha-BHC

beta-BtC delta-BHC

gaMa-K4C (Lindane) Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor Epoiide

Endosulfan I

Die ldr in

44--DDE Endrin

Endosulfan I I

44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin Ketone

alpha-Chlordane gaua-Chlordane

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124a

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

DILUTION FACTORDATE SAMPLEDDATE EmACTEDDATE ANALYZED

CRQL

005 005 005

005 005

005 005 005

010

010

010

010

010

010 010

05 010

005 005 10

005 005 005

005

005

10 10

fiP751 AP752 AP753 AP754 AP755 AP757 AP758 AP759 AP760 AP764 AP765 AP766

HW-BS HM-13D Qli-4SR NH-ISD S-6 H0-3SR N03SRD S-3 S-13 HN-l lD NN-lOl S-9

l l l l l l l l l l l l 4 lB 418 419 419 420 419 419 420 420 420 420 420

421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 529 529 530 550 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

I SMivslJtili Sdi l u l p i i

i rc i ion iu

itt7M

SMgtU UCITIOiI^AirU Rl EAiru u a a

Wrmvim CKH

Phtnol 330

Igt f ( 3 - Q i l v s r t i i r l ) t t t i i r 330

I 2-OiIworaquoli(Ofll 330 lJ-OicraquoiloraStoeJraquo 330

raquo - D j c M x o t n 2 t M 330

Bcnjyl AUotel 330

l 2 -D icUor f tSraquo fraquo t 330 I| 2 - l l t th r l f lMMl 330 I

I t il2- tk laro i^^f l l i thir 330 4-ltltthTlplIieMl 330 l lHIitroso-ti-a-prgprluini 330 Hiilaquochlcrottkat 330

I litrobe8znt 330 IsophvoM 330 2-ll itrevtanl 330 2lt-DiMtftrlraquotaraquoI 330

I Btaioic lcilt liOO t i tfJ-OUoriaUoiTintbjnf 330 2laquo-(icklarovlgtiael 330 124-Trirtloroktaine 330 IUphth4ltet 330

I I

4-Oilaroiiiiliot 330 HtKchloratotidinf 330 4-DilorB-3-)lftiTlfol 330 -lltthrltMp(itliIegtt 330 Htiiclil9rocrIopt9tidien( 330 24t-Trict l i rKlno 330 24i-Triioraeraquosl 1400 2-Oilergai^tbilcGlaquo 330 - laquo i t r 3 raquo i l i M liOO S iMthr lpt t lu l lU 330

I AcnapbUrlat 330 2amp-gtigtitrgtBlaw 330 JHI i t roMil iM UOO Dccnipkttnf 330

I I

24-DiaitrapOBol ItOO 4 - laquo t r e 0 n s i liOO Dibauef iru 330 2 - t i t i t n i B l a B i 330 l i t tb r lpk tk i l i te 330 4-ailoreli(arl-IVarlcthtr 330 H u r t M 330 laquo - l i t roau l iM 1600 46-Dicitre-2-flrtkrlpgtilaquonol 1600

I I

bull-bull i t rnadi tasr laa iHl l l 330 l -arotor tanl- tanl tUer 330 IhxKblBrgbmai 330 gtntipoundUargptageI 1600 Pb is t fUrot 330 RBthrxtM 330 Bi-laquo-tatTl|MbillaquoU 330 f l u r o U B c 330 P r t M 334

I I

ktYlbecTlpMkil j tc 330 33-eictlarg6f(Ki4iBr 660 Bn io la lc tUr t fnc 330 Oirytem 330 B i t (2- t tkTlknrn| l i t l i i l i t t 330Di-ii-laquoctrlpttbtllaquott 330 B tMon i l l a r iaUcM 330 lBU0(k) l lHr iBaat 334 Rnze(laquo)nm( 330 l i a taeH2 3 -a n r tn 330 Biktalak)jsUrltctgf 330

S-6 S-] S-13 S-t t t m raquo m laquoP7i2 AP7i3

430 IM UO IU 320 UJ JBO UJ

210 J

x = sssx rsslaquosTsssH=ssx i i cs s=saslaquossss3 ies r=3x3sssrsxxsxlaquox=5=s ssaxsssxs ts=

(IIUTIIM FtCT0lll2 MLUTICM FlaquoCTDIt0 IlLUTIOH FACTO) 11 DlUITin FACTOR 10

DATE EITtlaquoCTEl)4278f MTE EITRACTED42689 MTE EITRACTES42789 MTE EITmCTEII42689

MTE MULr2Egt32389 MTE AMLy2EIS2S89 MTE IWLgt2Egt-S2S89 MTE AMUrZECS238f

MTE SMmai42089 NTE SAIinpoundS424n MTE SlaquoMgtIED420B9 MTE SMinE042OBf

331 Noistari SOI I to i t tu r i 401 Hoit turt 431 h i i t u r t

I

PesticidePCB Aoueous Analysis

SITEtHOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAMgtLE NUHBER SANPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugL

CONPOUNDssss=ssss=sss=sss=s===ss

alpha-BHC

beta-BtC delta-BHC

gaMa-K4C (Lindane) Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor Epoiide

Endosulfan I

Die ldr in

44--DDE Endrin

Endosulfan I I

44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin Ketone

alpha-Chlordane gaua-Chlordane

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124a

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

DILUTION FACTORDATE SAMPLEDDATE EmACTEDDATE ANALYZED

CRQL

005 005 005

005 005

005 005 005

010

010

010

010

010

010 010

05 010

005 005 10

005 005 005

005

005

10 10

fiP751 AP752 AP753 AP754 AP755 AP757 AP758 AP759 AP760 AP764 AP765 AP766

HW-BS HM-13D Qli-4SR NH-ISD S-6 H0-3SR N03SRD S-3 S-13 HN-l lD NN-lOl S-9

l l l l l l l l l l l l 4 lB 418 419 419 420 419 419 420 420 420 420 420

421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 529 529 530 550 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

PesticidePCB Aoueous Analysis

SITEtHOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAMgtLE NUHBER SANPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugL

CONPOUNDssss=ssss=sss=sss=s===ss

alpha-BHC

beta-BtC delta-BHC

gaMa-K4C (Lindane) Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor Epoiide

Endosulfan I

Die ldr in

44--DDE Endrin

Endosulfan I I

44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin Ketone

alpha-Chlordane gaua-Chlordane

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124a

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

DILUTION FACTORDATE SAMPLEDDATE EmACTEDDATE ANALYZED

CRQL

005 005 005

005 005

005 005 005

010

010

010

010

010

010 010

05 010

005 005 10

005 005 005

005

005

10 10

fiP751 AP752 AP753 AP754 AP755 AP757 AP758 AP759 AP760 AP764 AP765 AP766

HW-BS HM-13D Qli-4SR NH-ISD S-6 H0-3SR N03SRD S-3 S-13 HN-l lD NN-lOl S-9

l l l l l l l l l l l l 4 lB 418 419 419 420 419 419 420 420 420 420 420

421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 529 529 530 550 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

S-9

PesticidePCB Soil Analysis

SITEMOTTOLO CASE 11766

SAHPLE NUHBER SAHPLE LOCATION

UNITS ugkg

CONPOUND

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gaua-BHC(Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDE Endrin Endosulfan 11 44-DDD Endosulfan Sulfate 44--DDT Methoxychlor Endrin Ketone alpha-Chlordane gaiaa-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

CRQL

80 80 80 BO 80 BO BO 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 800 160 800 800 1600 800 800 800 800 800 1600 1600

AP756 S-6

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED420B9 35X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42789 DATE ANALYZED530B9

AP7fcl S-3

DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATE SAMPLED42089 50X Moisture DATE EXTRACTED425B9 DATE ANALYZED53089

AP762 S-13

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED42089 40X noisutre DATE EXTRACTED427B9 DATE ANALYZED530B9

ftP763

DILUTION FACTOR10 DATE SAMPLED 42099 437 Moisture DATE EXTRACTED42589 DATE ANALYZED53089

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION I S i t e Haae Mo-Holo Data Review Worksheets Reference Nuaber CDin ti

REGION I REVIEW OP ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied ( laboratory nane) (j(=1^]rc^ data package r ece ived a t Region I has been reviewed and t h e q u a l i t y assurance and performance d a t a sumaarized The data review Inc luded

c a s e NO ( t l U SAS No - ~ Sampling Date (a) yjy v ^ h SDG NO ^P7g M a t r i x ^ g ^ Shipping Date(8) v ^ ^ Ho of sanples (^ -^V Date Recraquod by Lab ^ ^ amp A

T r a f f i c Report Nos A-P75-t - pi(fi(gt

Trip Blank No A f n d ^ Equipment Blank No KJOr^^ Field Dup Nos fkP ^ltr^yAagtns^^ AF7 lt^AJ^^CO^ PcPOGfii^3D

SOW No pM^^ requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dup -Holding Times -Field Duplicates bullGCMS Tuning -Internal Standard Performance -Calibrations -Pesticide Inst Performance -Blanks -Compound Identification -Surrogate Recoveries -Compound Quantitation

Overall comments P^ -h r iuA^ lt D n i ^ ^ A J M a p ^ e r ^ c U ^ OA

Definitions and Qualifiers

A Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria bull Compound not detected

^iu^G^^ Reviewer V iurltJL^ uc - -u ^ Date

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets

I DATA COMPLETENESS

yiTSSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

a^-f(^yl^iA^ 1^ Lr^-tJl fz^M

hj SrO^l^

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION I

Data Review Worksheets Complete table for all samples and circle the

II HOLDING TIMES fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAMPLE DATEJi^- DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

s2_Oi jiliiAl ^ ^ t

A^P75X ^kM AL ^U^ s- ho M^llt^h I^^Af ^1shy

Mgtiplusmnplusmn_ i M M jpoundh^__LJhi ^ k b

^ P 7 ^ ^ H T ^ M ^Iz-i ^ k H bull i l^ i ^ K

A n ^ t ^^A7 r ) ^ - ^^-i ^ 3 o

M^^n ^hll^ g-2-(^ rh^ V r ^ ) 3 - lt l A^S-8 _ i l l l t L

^ | 5 ^ ) z lt r z ^

M lloO V^yf 4- ^ ^2lt^ Vz-j _f_M

y^gf ifi

i liL rzs- jxs- ^j^g Mn ^P-7(9-^^ yAgAf 4^- s^M^--^ ^^n ^ 3

P c l h ^ y^^ ^ (2^ 2 - i 2-S~ ^ 5gt^

HPii^^ fMfn poundI Zv dl Z-1 5^J2^

h^i^s- j H ^ M^

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic w i t h i n 7 days non-aromatic wi th in 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n Preserved Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n So i l s Both w i t h i n 14 days of sample c o l l e c t i o n

BNA amp PEST - Extracted wi th in 7 days analyzed within 40 days s o i l s and water

ACTION 1 I f holding times a r e exceeded a l l pos i t ive r e s u l t s a re es t imate

(J) and non-detects a r e es t imated (UJ) 2 I f holding times a r e g r o s s l y exceeded the reviewer may

determine t h a t n o n - d e t e c t s a r e unusablepi^i^K)^ v

Aa rf^3M^T-igtox(^- I)JAJU S f^^lt^e^ JjKit

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and circle the fractions which are not within criteria

VOA BNA PEST SAJ4PLE DATE-jt DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I D SAMPLED ANAL EXTR ANAL EXTR ANAL

Wfr^W^ KIK ^ ^ ^]Uugt VM 5^1z^^ mdashmdash^ - l ^ illhin V l ] ^ laquo - ^ ( ^

raquo lt

bull

VOA - Unpreserved Aromatic within 7 days non-aromatic within 14 days of sanple collection Preserved Both within 14 days of sample collection Soils Both within 14 days of sample collection

BNA amp PEST bullgt Extracted within 7 days analyzed within 40 days soils and water

ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimate

(J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ) 2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may

determine that non-detects are unusabllaquo()

^

^ s j i i ^ - n

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III GCMS TUNING

The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria

If no Samples affected

IJPKL The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to i e within mdash the specified criteria gtl^^ a x xU j yo^s i + ^er4-cgtnrn-^d

If no Samples affected

If nass calibration is in error refer to the Region guidelines for expanded criteria If necessaxry all associated data as unusable (R)

JMA

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date Of Initial Calibration ^ - k - ^ h l s ^ Dates of Continuing Cal ibrations ^ h o s-t^ raquo-2 7 yshyInstrument ID x K L amp L

DATE CpTTERIA OUT COMPOUND RFraquoRSDRFD

mdash SamoleSampless AffectedAffected W T ^ T H J ^ ^ W I

Samples Affected f^pp^hp^cp ^XTJOKTP^T^^^^

5-0 ^0 P i^TTU^t^u^ Samples Affected Sf^uzo^ C^o)

Hot) ^a^-^-w^ aJU^-4Ji C^ii)

Samples Affected s e i c^^ Lf^o

Samples Affected SLICOX- C^lt^^

Samples Affected ^ecco^ C O)

Samples Affected sm_ilt- OCL-^NO)

^ Samples Af fected ^ l E i ^ A^7S-Z (Agtgtgt

Id D )6-poundnuy^-^ 6UEJ3 C^P-3)

Sanples Affected fP^^AT^ZTZ (tuo)

Samples Affected A-PTST txPfs^ c ^ o

Samples Affected y ^ ^ ^ WTsri C^o^ 00) Sx^ytyC gt^^-gt^-W f4r jU^ jLA-^h^ C - (gt )

bull Samples Affected AC-^X Mgt7S3iECNigt)

Samples Affected Acy^7S~i^^cvis~7_ ^ t i i o

Samples Affected y p i ^ - ^ Ap^^- LAo

See worksheet IV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each Initial curva

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IV B SEMIVOLATILE CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Date of I n i t i a l C a l i b r a t i o n s k ~ ^bSj Dates of Continuing C a l i b r a t i o n s ^Oi $-y ^A^ ^ s i Instrument XD x HSd- J

PATE CRITERIA OUT CQMPQVNP ~ r RFRSpRF0 n - r bull N

mdash Samples Affected H^r5 -A-r^srs- C O)

Samples Affected Any7r3-AP7^sCVPgt7

7a p b lt ^ M ^ K 6 ^ lt gt W ^ ^ ^yhpUL^MUj^ E S 9 o Samples Affected M^^^-y s -^ CNS

r Samples Affected ficPl^Q-^w^) 1^lt^i^degi C^ogty

P) J l - ^ U t i 4 ^ y i ^ - i i U ^ f ^ - ^ ^ i j L ^ ^ ^ ^

Samples Affected fiiP7(oo- Mnb^^ bull7^ltOT^lt^ C I ^ O )

Samples Affected AP76o-A^76e^ 7fc -rj-lt vgt

Sanples Affected fi^p-ibo-^Fi(o^ n r i i T^lt^ CAJCgt

^ Samples Affected A- y^e 7( lt j 72^ 0 ^ i raquo

Samples Affected A^n^j i^ nhf^fh-^a^ ^ C^igt^

Le Affected Af-laquo-77rA7467s^ Vt)Sanpless Affected

Sanples Affected M gt 7 ^ i i - J ^ ^ j ^ i b t ^ j i ^ i ^ fAAgtgt

Sanples Affected ^ - i ^ ^ ^ s ^ i b ( ^ j ^ 5 - ^ ^ CNO

Sanples Affected Mgtisi l 5^-r6(^7nfZ^^N0)

~ Sanples Affected

See worksheet XV-A for criteria and actions

A nev vorksheet should be filled out for each initial curva

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X

D a t a R e v i e w Worksheet

V A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS

L i s t t h e con t amina t ion i n t h e

1 L a b o r a t o r y Blanks PATE JAB JD FRACTION

MATRIX

Ji^iTpi amp0Plt coi^ft

^A^i^Hjt

c 2 E q u i p m e n t and T r i p B lanks

pATE TR i rRACTION MATRIX

(Sections 1 amp 2)

blanks below

COMPOUND

^Uct-v-jgtavv (fgt ^ r gt

COMPOUND

EXcuM-i^^^CfoAJj^Ua^t^

Level fauJ

CONCENTRATTOfty UNITS

(nO 7lt^-oi^flt^

CONCENTRATION

mills

E^J^AJJT

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

V B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 3)

3 Blank Actions

Action levels should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant determined in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the compound in the sanple exceeds the action level of 10 xs the amount in the blank for the common contaminants or 5 xs the anount for any other conpound Specific actions are as follows

1 The concentration is less than the CRQL report the CRQL

2 The concentration is greater than the CRQL but less than the action level report the concentration found U

3 The concentration is greater than the action level report the concentration unqualified

For examples refer to the Regional Guidelines

Common contaminants raquo methylene chloride acetone 2-butanone toluene and phthalates

COMPOUND MAX CONC ACTION LEVEL poundR2L W^^^^ VNITS VNITg

4 U -LUj^ynyc^yH^jA^^f Splydh^^ ^^TTD ^ ^X^-Jin ^ HC

^ M ( j yfi-y^^^^r^ lt0 V ^ ^ ^ w iM) A^ 3X^^ ^ riC

y ^ y W f ^ x gt ^ ayu^^^^i^^rgt^ I 6 y ^ n ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r i C

A separate worksheet should be used for low and medium level blanks

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VI SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES

List the percent recoveries which do not meet the criteria for surrogate recovery

Matrix ^ y t ^ J ^

5 BH A PEST

TR ^S TOL BFB DCP NBZ FBP TPH PHL 2FP TRp pBC

f ^ ^^3 ^ 2 APiSsee j _ _ _ (n^^ _^ ~

j m k i lAi A^-T^Lshy V pound

QC Limits 3 ^ - M EH ^

t o t o t o toHJL

fro to to -^

t o 1271

to IX^

to src

Surrogate ActionsPERCENT RECOVERY

-Advisory only

lt101 lO^-CRR gt C ^ Positive sample results J J j Non-detected results R UJ A

CRR - Contract Required Recovery Range Surrogate action should be applied

1 If at least two surrogates in a BN or A fraction or one surrogate in the VOA fraction are out of specification but have recoveries of gt10

2 If any one surrogate in a fraction shows lt10recovery JT-X-o ci-y^U4r^ L^H^^ z raquo t u j ^ j p o ^ u X Z c ^ _A ilt-ltltlaquo gttxA4gtu_ vy^jAZ

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR wos A ^ l o Z l^^plusmnf^^ Levi IcrW Matrixi StrrX

List the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the criteria stated on F o m 3

fRACTlONZ CQMPOVNamp lpoundpoundpoundi^ oc LIMITS M5 Qlaquo ltSP -- ^ li-

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLY

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVgRY lt X ^ 10 - CRi 2poundBS

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria^ flag positive results for that compound as estlmatad (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE

1 Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries and Precision

TR NOSAP-^-^ M ^ Tm^rp^ Level loW Matrix ^ V ^

L i s t the percent recoveries and RPDs of compounds which do not Beet the c r i t e r i a s ta ted on For 3

FRACTION CQHPQVNP iBESJL oc LIMITS

MS OR MSD ^XEIL

fclyWU-AT (^^2 ^ 3^- BO

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONUf

1 If any compound does not neet the Contract Required Recovery range (CRR) follow the actions stated belov

PERCENT RECOVg^Y ltlfii IPI shy CRR iSBZ

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

2 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VXX A MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

1 M a t r i x Spike Matr ix Spike Dupl ica te Recover ies and Prec i s ion

TR Nos A^l^-z M9-raquor-- Mst Leve l Ifc i j Mat r ix tAJai^v-

L i s t t h e p e r c e n t r ecover ies and RPDs of compounds which do no t B e e t t h e c r i t e r i a s t a t e d on Font 3

fRACTlON CQMPgVHP 1 E pound pound Z oc L I M I T S

yg OR MSD Ji2SL

QUALIFICATION IS LIMITED TO THE UNSPIKED SAMPLE ONLf

1 I f any compound does not meet t h e Contract Reqpjlred Recovery range (CRR) follow the ac t i ons s t a t e d be lov

PERCENT RECOVray ltlfii 10 - CRR gtpoundB2

Positive Sample Results J J j Kon-detected Results R A A

3 If any compound does not meet the RPD criteria flag positive results for that compound as estimated (J)

A separate vorksheet should be used for each MSMSD pair

1 ^ - - ^ P ^ I M ^ ^ - gt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VII B MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (Section 2)

3 Matrix Spike Duplicate - Unspiked Compounds

TR Nos fy^p-^ ^ M ^ M ^ r gt

List the concentrations of the unspiked compounds and determine the percent RSDs of the unspiked sample matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate No limits have been developed for the RSD values of the unspiked compounds

fRACTION COMPOVNP SAMPLE MS MSD CONC IRSD

( B r _ M ^ 2yMS^fi4Sh I YW m-ltn]U C pd W ^ d c O ^ ^ ^

N C - hio^C4MAAMjrtL

The reviewer must use professional judgement to determine if there is a need to qualify any of the unspiked compounds in the sample

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X y Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION lto I raquoshy

TR N03AP79-7 7 r ^ Matrix wiifvl_

List the concentrations of the compounds which do not meet the following RPD criteria ^^^ - fcj_

1 An RPD of 0 0 for water duplicates 2 An RPD of lt50 for soil duplicates A I raquo J

TCI t o ^ o ^ ^ ^ wlt2w- i Jb- SjL-UA-tl IA 4raquoecl cL^tic^^i-FRACTION COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC DUP SAMPLE CONC RPD

(

ACTIONS

1 If the results for any componds do not meet the RPD criteria flag the positive results for that compound as estimated

2 If one value is non-detected and one is above the CRQL a Flag the positive result as estimated (J) b Flag the non-detected result as estimated (UJ)

NOTE Professional judgement may be utilized to apply duplicate actions to all sanples of a similar matrix

A separate worksheet should be filled out for each field duplicate pair

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

I REGION X Data Review Worksheets

IX INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE

List the internal standard areas of samples which do not meet the criteria of +100 or -50 of the internal standard area in the associated continuing calibration standard

SAMPLE ID DATE IS OUT IS AREA ACCEPTABLE RANGE ACTION RT

ACTION

1 If an IS area count is outside the criteria -50 or +100 of the associated standard

a Positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (J) for that sample fraction

b Non-detects for compounds quantitated using that IS are flagged as estimated (UJ) for that sample fraction

c If extremely low area counts are reported or if performance exhibits a major drop-off then a severe loss of sensitivity is indicated Non-detects should then be flagged as unusable (R)

2 If an IS retention time varies more than 30 seconds the chronatographic profile for that sample must be examined to determine if any false positives or negatives exist For shifts of a large magnitude the reviewer may consider partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction

V

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

^^ REGION X

bull Data Review Worksheets

X A PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 1)

1 DDT Retention Time

DPT ehC^-inry^ 4im^S vJO-rC ^ e O - W -H^^ ll vwrnu i s List the DDT standards which have a retention time (RT) of less than 12 minutes on the packed column (except OV-1 or OV-101)

STAKDARD ID PATE EI SAMPLES AFFECTED ACTIONS TIME

ACTION

If the RT is less than 12 minutes examine the chromatography to evaluate the separation If adequate separation is not achieved flag all affected conpound data as unusable (R)

y

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION 1 D a t a Review Worksheets

X B PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE ( S e c t i o n 2)

2 R e t e n t i o n Time Windows

L i s t t h e compounds which a r e n o t w i t h i n t h e e s t a b l i s h e d w indows

COMPOUND DATE RT RT WINDOW SAMPLES AFFECTED (TIME)

Check the sample chromatograms of the samples analyzed after the last in control standard for peaks within an expanded window If no peaks are present there is usually no effect on the data Refer to Regional guidelines for information on qualifying data if peaks are present If peaks are present discuss actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X D PESTICIDE INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (Section 4)

4 DBC Retention Time Check

List the percent difference for the DBC shift greater than 2 for packed columns greater than 15 for wide-bore capillary columns or greater than 03 for narrow-bore capillary columns

TR i S PBC ^DIFFERENCE ACTIONS

- Z I

V^LLOZ - r 2 - | A

v^^o-b - ^ A

If -the DBC does not meet the retention time criteria the analysis may be flagged as unusable (R) for the affected samples but qualification of the data is left up to the professional judgement of the reviewer Discuss any qualification of the data below

y ^^ (^^MAA

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X

Data Review worksheets

XI A PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sections 1 and 2)

1 Initial calibration List the compounds which did not meet the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) criteria of less than 10 for the initial calibration on the quantitation column

pATE COMPOUND BsectI1 COLUMN SAMPLES AfFFrTFp

(

Flag all associated positive results as estimated (J) for samples which did not neet the RSD criteria

2 Analytical Sequence 3

Did th^^^^oratory follow the correct 72 hour sequence described in the SOW ^es^r No

If no

The data may be affected The data reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XI B PESTICIDE CALIBRATION (Sec t ion 3)

( J M M ^ U ^ ^ QtyEiWAJruyn l^(E o u J ^ v-O-v-L IfiMJ- shy

3 Cont inuing C a l i b r a t i o n

L i s t t h e compounds which d id not meet t h e p e r c e n t d i f f e r ence (D) c r i t e r i a of lt15 on the q u a n t i t a t i o n column o r lt20 on t h e confirmation fo r t h e con t inu ing c a l i b r a t i o n

DATE COMPOUND I D COLUffll SAMPLES AFFECTED

I f t h e D c r i t e r i a i s not met f lag a l l a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s as e s t i m a t e d ( J )

J)^

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

^ REGION I ( Data Review Worksheets

X I I SAMPLE QUANTITATION

J ^ a c t i o S r ^ ^ deg bull ^^^^^ ^ -laquo raquo P 1 ca lcu la t ion per

SQiU

JBHAI (^o-z^ M O n ^ ) ^ ^ o o o c a ) - ( ^T) f ^ O ^ ^ 5 0 (

l ^

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

DOC SUMMARY FORM

1 IITI wtoioii - X

HfrtklfiNAMC

MAeEM_CsifiSI O Z J C ^ J I S ZICCATCN M l M l M l C M r t NO fU

t MeoiA ton SWSEO onen13 vti WSK CVM eoo oiveiAampsess ALTS OCSCN OETBl nSCDWL (HU)AFPVn ACTION Sfitltfm fgt(a

raquogteTngti T) g ^ f ^ ^^y a n n i ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^

1 SITE INFORUATIOM

AflaquoA ^Or^ 06nHTOClaquoXK)WATBraquo f ^

r^raquoI^^^Lrfraquoltf f^O^0UiJs~ i^lt-^^U^cyltJj ltAJ^Xygt

DATA r v P M lt c e u A f w w laquo A r E O A r A rA ANAiyTKALMTA

raquo T a raquo bullPHVSOLOATA

PCftOSmrGAAKSISsuLKCosrrr

fGCTnAT WUTfCSi

CNTUT

NOf NTRSME PHASS)

SOiCE GW 00MgtO6flE

I AMAlTTKAt UVClS (raquoCCATFUrvEUS)AftDRXlaquogtIUetfriAC7gtlaquo0laquo

UEvai P B f i SClaquoBraquoC-euroOUWeiT bull

UVB1 nELDAraquo(ALY8B-E0Urraquolaquolff

LEVEL) NOHCL^LASOfWTORVKCTHOOS

j LEVELS NONSTAWAflO ^ mdash___gt_laquo

1 SAWPUNG PROCEOUm

AAcxcAOUND bull 2 PER Eyen on

CfUTCAL (UST) J ^ ^ V ^ ffCCSXfa drfZrA

U O U t L t n COHTML SA l aS (C 0laquoraquo IClaquoSET5WClAlaquo | A PCA ampU80RAT0frr COUOCATS)-9 ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fltCAGCNTBLAM(-1 PER AMALYS6 BATCHCH REPLCATE- SOH I REPUCATE bull 1 PER ANALYSIS BATCHON FlClJDeLAM(-90R UATROCSPK -11bull 1 PERANALYSeBATOiORSMCEE ^ TRPBUAMC- 1PER0AT0I I_Lmdash ODCR

11 BUOCn REOUIREWENTS

BUDGET

STAfP mcua ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COHTRACTOR

s n t WANAOER H ( h a f t k t t h c ^ k

MIME COWTRACTOR C ^ D M

OATt

F P C

POA OETAU SEE SAMPLNS t ANMVS8 PUN COM SFOOOLCQI

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

DOO SUMMARY FORM

1 t iTB IP RtOCN f^p-thlo R X

NAME R i t M l EAAPB RO RA ^bullsss-rmf m J N i t

(cnaiOAii

I NEOIA BOl onelaquo

L V t t m RSK EVAL eoo PW UgtlaquoT0RN1 OT)laquoR^ (CJAOEAUlHi r CHARAC ALTS 0E5CN UEIW mJBXH

laquoMSgt ACTQM APPir) TfTO 4 OBJECnvt Tb Verifu^ YRPs S^dyim-ey^-i ^r^i-Hrr^

r^^ul-M

t SITE INFORMATION

1 - ^ OEFTH T O G R O L K ) W A T 9

tlaquoXJlaquoWATERUBE Pyl^^gtfe^ A ^ C ^ ^ i y ^ l ^ ^ ^ ^ - gtiyu-ltJM AREA ^ ^

i T H I t ^ p f ^^raquogt^^^^gt^ A ^ ^ 0 W lt ^ ^

SdTVPESi w I T r ^ ^ mdash 1 g- bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull - ^ bull y ^ - bull bull ^ bull f c ^ mdash mdash ^ 1 j ^ I raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull g

SENSffl RECgTOBS Ti lygtyf^ ^ O T M ) 1^ f^ ^ R ^ lt ^ j f ^ T Z L M Ad^O^^gy ^

I OATA TYPES (CnOEAPfWyWAIEMrA TYPE

A AMALV IPHYSOIOATA

PEBMEABUrr HVDRAUUCXAO POAOSnV PEgtCTnAT1CNTEST

caANsia Htfocss eULKOENSflV

7 SAMPLING UETHOO f C W U t C n O O l ^ TO B E i A E a ^

eJvnailaquoCNrAL BWED C ^ ^ NotKrousivc PHASS

S a K S GRO OOkPOSITE C N 7 T W

I ANALYTICAL LEVELS (nDCATELrvEUSJANDEOUPtCvriACTHOOe

IEVB1 nampDSCflpoundBraquoC-EQUPWOff

LEVELI g raquo i f gt raquo raquo m v laquo t f t t i l gt u f i l f

UEVELS NONCLP tABORATORY-IcmOOS

LEVELS NONSTAMiARD

SAMPUNG PROCEDURU

BACKGROUND - 3 PER EVBfT OR i i ^ CRITICAL (UST) ^ ~ S

^ f r - f l w r shy

ia euALfn CONTROL t kypy js ioa f ruonsErs rA iOAf io i A F d S B LABORATORV OOU0CATCD-90R _ _ _ x _ _ _ RCACENTBLAm-1 PER ANALYSE BATCH OR REPLCATE- SOR - I REPUCATE -1 PER ANALYSIS BATCH ON c i p a i i M f ML r a UATTVXSPIS -1 PER ANALYS6 BATCH OR TRPBlAMt-lPERDAYOR m O i t L f i g J K ^ ^ l i C M

CONTRACTOR K a r ^ PRIME CONTRACTOR lt )M F A l

v n UANAOER OATC

FOR DETAU SEE SAMPLMG laquo ANAIYSS PLAN cousroooixca

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

p ^ ^

Region X ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO W ^ G SITE Uokilo LABORATORY C F I U I C NO OF SAMPLES

MATRIX l^lAJikMr 4-StgtA

SDG f ^ e ^ b REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) 02gt^ QgUrU w^ rimS ltgtf bull

SOW REVIEWERS NAME 4-l^v^OLSsrp

DPa ACTION FYI ^ COMPLETION DATE r h b lt ^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1 HOLDING TIMES NA 2 bull O

2 GCMS TUNEINSTR PERFORM UA

3 CALIBRATIONS il O

4 BLANKS

5 SURROGATES If t 6 MATRIX SPIKEDUP l l x 7 OTHER QC X- -n 8 INTERNAL STANDARDS -pound2 KA

9 COMPOUND IDENTinCATION XL _Q 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 O

11 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ii A or O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M s Data qualified due to major problems Z laquo= Data unacceptable X raquo Problems but do not affect data

AREAS OF CONCERN sjgtrvrcLL uMs bull Hl - ^BeiW cdjiUL H^uJJ^ t ^ t ^ o i i S d y ^ ^

( ^ l]n^^^ (gtf fJMMeJt WtM (A- ^ d t Sampyy^^ bull

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

plo^a In Ref erence to Case No(s)

11^ tH ^(p Contract Laboratory Program

REGIONALLABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Telephone Record Log

Date of Call fTyf ^ Szf Z f ^ d ^ j S^ f t l ^reg

Laboratory Name d ^ H I C ( yen o ) ^ 2 f ^ C O

Lab Contact CV) C M u i

Region - ^

Regional Contact A n t i T L R j ^ a ^J^ iD CJgtM P l ^ C

Call Initiated By Laboratory Region ^^L C ^ Pl^C-

In reference to data for the folloviing sample numbeKs)

( p S j l l jjyi lt^ O^ii^^ RATA- onnt CaMh mdash ^ k 9ib^

Summary of QuestionsIssues Discussed

Q M y U)alt ri MSMSh per-figt^^eiL am Med Uiy^sAJMfU4f^i17

Qgt A r iVic zuAD y jLhi f W r ^ i m j pres^e^ ^

Summary of Resolution ^ CjvfhutZjL ^ f^ bull

^ i C Wkc b^jjJAJL- T UJILS (A)iUbUj -ff^ a_ ^^S^e^xJS^ ZC ^ltf A^vt

cOcU

t i O^lf th fyyh J M J U JK Vfu ltli^lfnlt 1 ^ ^ -TZraJUbA^

^ ML fMi A

Signature ^ Date

Distribution (l)Lab Copy (2) Region Copy7v3) SMO Copy

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)

REGION X

Data Review Worksheets

X C PESTICIDE INSTRUKENT PERFORMANCE (Section 3)

3 DDT and Endrin Degradation I L - ^

List the standards which have a DDT or Endrin breakdown of greater than 20 STANDARD DDT OR PEPCENT SAMPltEg AFFECTEP DDD DDE OR

I D ENDRIN BPEAKDQWH ENDRIN KETON^ PRESENT

If the percent breakdown for DDT is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for DDT as estinated (J) for all samples following the last in control standard If no DDT was present but DDD andor DDE are positive then flag the quantitation linit for DDT as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for DDD O T DDE as estinated (J)

If the percent breakdown for Endrin is greater than 20

1 Flag all positive results for endrin as estimated (J) for all sanples following the last in-control standard If no endrin was detected but endrin aldehyde andor endrin ketone are positive flag the quantitation limit for endrin as unusable (R)

2 Flag all positive results for endrin ketone as estimated (J)