Sin eng-18 - kill of killer litter (annex)
-
Upload
sochinaction -
Category
Business
-
view
1.601 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Sin eng-18 - kill of killer litter (annex)
1 | P a g e
ANNEX 2: Proposal to curb killer litter in
Singapore
2 | P a g e
Mark
3 | P a g e
Content Page Abstract ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2 Background research and findings ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3‐8 Finer details of our proposal ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 9‐10 Petition (with signature) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 11 Conclusion ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 12
4 | P a g e
Abstract
We are a group of students from Raffles Institution who have embarked on a project called “Design for Change”. This is a project started in India and it aims to empower children to make a positive difference in the world. It encourages children to come up with ideas to improve their local community and has just recently spread to Singapore.
A pressing problem that we have identified is the rising trend of killer litter in Singapore. News reports have shown that there was a staggering amount of 4900 warning letters issued to residents living in HDB estates for placing their belongings in dangerous positions in 2009 and this number has continued to increase ever since then. Through our project work, we hope to create a change in people’s mindset about the issue of killer litter. By showing them the adverse consequences of killer litter, we hope to influence them to become more civic‐minded Singaporeans and at the same time, cut down the number of casualties resulting from killer litter. However, even with constant encouragement and reminders, many irresponsible Singapore citizens will continue to put others at risk by committing acts of killer litter. This is when we would need the help of the government to either increase the penalty for killer litter, or conduct more spot‐checks around neighborhoods, or preferably both. The government may also consider modifying HDB flats to protect against killer litter. Thus, we sincerely hope that the government would help to curb this pressing issue and have petitioned for a change to be implemented in the current system of dealing with killer litter cases. In conclusion, the three solutions that we are proposing are:
Increase penalty for killer litter.
Conduct frequent spot‐checks for potential killer litter.
Install ledge on HDB flats to trap and collect killer litter.
5 | P a g e
Background Research and findings Firstly, through our literature review, we have discovered that the number of warnings given out to HDB residents regarding placing their belongings in dangerous positions has hit an all‐time high of 4900 just recently in 2009. These objects are placed riskily on the edge of the windows, etc. and may potentially result in killer litter, eventually causing injuries and even death. This represents an increasing pattern in the number of potential killer litter and is a worrying issue to the Singaporean community.
As the majority of Singaporeans live in high‐rise HDB flats, they are constantly at a risk of being hit by killer litter. This does not only pollute the environment and damage our reputation as a “clean and green country”; it also endangers the lives of residents. One example was during 2009, a woman had thrown a chili bottle out of her 16th floor apartment in Compassvale. This disrupted the on‐going wedding at the void deck and injured a guest who had to be hospitalized.
Other than information from our literature, we have also conducted a perception survey among the public to find out their awareness and views about killer litter. The results that we received reflected very badly of the respondents and goes to show the ignorance of the Singaporean community on this issue.
The results are as follows: 1. Awareness of killer litter among Singaporeans:
After compiling our results, we have discovered that many Singaporeans have a false perspective about killer litter. Many of them feel that they know what killer litter is, yet are unable to properly define the term.
The first part of this conclusion is supported
by the results from the question, “Do you know what killer litter is?” As shown in figure 1, 100% of our respondents are confident that they know what killer litter is. This figure is astoundingly large and shows us that most Singaporeans are aware of what killer litter is. However, this initial assumption was later proven wrong when many of the respondents failed to provide an accurate explanation and definition of killer litter in the second part of the question.
From Figure 2, we can see that many respondents are unable to accurately define the term “killer litter”. This result is contradictory to the previous finding as it shows that the Singaporean community lacks awareness about killer litter. From these two findings, we can infer that while many Singaporeans feel that they knew what killer litter is, more than half of the respondents gave a wrong explanation of killer when asked to do so. This finding, along
Figure 1: Awareness of killer litter among respondents
6 | P a g e
with the previous one, shows us that while many Singaporeans feel that they know what killer litter is, they actually do not much. In fact, what they have is a false perception of killer litter that is inaccurate and unreliable.
This may prove to be a problem as they would not know what is included within the boundaries of killer litter and thus, may commit such an act unknowingly. For example, one may not think that throwing a 10 cent coin out of a HDB flat is considered as killer litter. However, the momentum caused by gravity may exponentially increase the impact of the coin and may eventually cause injury to passers‐by. In order to solve this problem, we feel that we need to raise the awareness of killer litter among Singaporeans and educate them about what killer litter is. This is to ensure that do not develop a false perception of killer litter and unknowingly commit this heinous act. A few ways to do so would be to conduct talks about killer litter, organize exhibitions in local community centers, or even to put up simple posters educating the people about killer litter. These findings are further supported by the results of the mini‐quiz included in the survey that we distributed. This mini‐quiz requires the respondent to identify and tick 3 out of 5 pictures depicting cases of killer litter. The results of this mini‐quiz were very bad and illustrated how ignorant Singaporeans are about killer litter. From figure 3, we can see that 60% of our respondents scored 2 points or less out of a maximum of 3. For
such an easy and straightforward quiz, these results are terrible and clearly show the low levels of awareness among Singaporeans about killer litter. Furthermore, results from figure 4 shows that 80% of our respondents are not aware of the numerous cases of killer that have been happening in Singapore, some of which resulted in injury and even death. This could mean that there is not enough coverage of these cases by media. This lack of coverage could lead to the undermining of the seriousness of killer litter in the Singaporean community. One may feel that because it doesn’t
Figure 2: Awareness of killer litter among respondents
Figure 3: Results of mini‐quiz
Figure 4: Awareness of the numerous cases of killer litter
7 | P a g e
appear in the news much, it is not as important or significant enough. However, this problem is actually very real and commonplace in the high‐rise HDB estates found around Singapore. Thus, a food for thought for us would be to include information about previous cases of killer litter in our posters and exhibitions. In conclusion, we can summarize our findings into 3 points:
Many Singaporeans have a false perception of killer litter.
There is not enough coverage of killer litter cases in Singapore.
We should try to raise more awareness about killer litter in the Singaporean community.
2. Reasons behind the rising trend of killer litter in Singapore
To tackle the problem of killer litter effectively, we wanted to find out about the root cause
of killer litter to begin with. Only after we have discovered the causes of killer litter are we able to nip the problem in its bud. It would also better equip us to select the best solutions to use to curb killer litter.
Firstly, we wanted to know if people committed killer litter knowingly or unknowingly. If
most Singaporeans commit killer litter unknowingly, it means that awareness levels about killer litter in the Singaporean community are low and it would be better to focus our project on educating the public on killer litter. However, if more Singaporeans commit litter knowingly, it would be better to come up with some sort of deterrence that would make Singaporeans think twice before throwing rubbish out of their high‐rise apartments.
From figure 5, we can see that most of our
respondents feel that Singaporeans commit killer litter intentionally. However, there are still quite a large proportion of respondents who feel that Singaporeans commit killer litter unintentionally, about 35%. We feel that this figure is significant enough for us to focus our project on both aspects of educating the public about killer litter, and to come up with deterrence for killer litter.
But to come up with more detailed solutions to the problem of killer litter, we would have
to identify specific reasons as to why people commit this heinous act. Figure 6 shows the different reasons as to why people commit killer litter intentionally. As
we can see, many culprits of killer litter either do it to purposely hurt someone, possibly out of anger or as a prank. Such cases can be considered as a crime and thus, a possible solution would be to increase the penalty for killer litter. Another main reason for intentional killer litter
Figure 5: Intentions of killer litter
8 | P a g e
is that people knowingly place objects in a dangerous position. This demonstrates how uncivilized and ill‐mannered our Singaporean community is. In order to prevent such cases from happening, we suggest organizing frequent spot‐checks around the HDB estates to catch and identify possible killer objects placed in dangerous positions. If people still refuse to change their bad habits, a last resort would be to install a protective ledge on new HDB flats to “catch” any falling rubbish or debris and prevent them from falling onto passers‐by.
According to our findings, as shown in figure 7,
there are two main reasons as to why people unintentionally commit killer litter. The first is carelessness, which is voted by 68% of the respondents to be the most pressing reason. The second is that many Singaporeans do not know the consequences of killer litter and thus, feel that it is alright to do so, despite having no intentions to hurt anybody. In order to solve the problem of carelessness, an effective solution would be to put up posters around the HDB estates to constantly remind residents to be careful not to throw any litter from their high‐rise apartments. Another effective solution targeted at those who are unaware of the dire consequences of killer litter would be education. Through organized talks and exhibitions, we can educate the general public on the dangerous effects resulted from killer litter.
In conclusion, we have identified a few possible solutions to curb the problem of killer litter:
Increase penalty for killer litter
Conduct frequent spot‐checks around neighborhoods
Install protective ledges on HDB flats
Organize talks and exhibitions about killer litter
Put up posters
Figure 6: Reasons for intentional killer litter
Figure 7: Reasons for unintentional killer litter
9 | P a g e
3. Public views on killer litter Killer litter has always been a pressing problem that the government has yet to solve. In
order to get rid of this problem, HDB (Housing Development Board) has launched an anti‐killer litter campaign to urge Singaporeans to adopt a zero‐tolerance policy towards killer litter. As part of its plan, HDB have sent advisory letters to HDB households; put up displaying posters on all notice boards; and worked with town councils, grassroots organizations, and even religious groups to educate Singaporeans on the consequences of killer litter. However, according to our survey results, these efforts have either gone unnoticed among the Singaporean community or stirred little interest amongst Singaporeans.
Figure 8 shows the public’s response to the question
“Have you noticed the government’s efforts to curb killer litter?” From the graph, we can see that a large number of respondents, about 55% have not noticed the government’s efforts to curb killer litter at all. This might be because the government has not been proactive enough in engaging the general public. Instead of relying on posters and flyers, face‐to‐face exhibitions and talks might be more effective in coaching the public into adopting a zero‐tolerance policy towards killer litter. These figures are very disappointing and we hope to be able to make an impact by helping to curb the problem of killer litter.
This result justifies our project and shows us that there is a need for a solution to stop killer litter once and for all. Through our Design for Change action week, we hope to be able to create a positive impact in this field and change Singapore for the better.
Figure 9 shows that majority of our respondents feel that killer litter is a pressing issue that must be solved immediately. This also shows us that many Singaporeans are willing to change for the better and help to solve the problem of killer litter. Thus, as long as a proper action plan is implemented, we feel that it is possible to curb the problem of killer litter. This is also another justification for our project as killer litter is a pressing problem that we should all work to solve as soon as possible.
Figure 8: Public views on government efforts
Figure 9: Public views on killer litter
10 | P a g e
As we can see from the results above, the government’s current efforts to stop killer litter have not been very successful. They have either gone unnoticed among the public or it was unable to stir up enough public interest to create a buzz about the issue. Thus, we sincerely hope that the government would take up a more active role in solving this pressing problem and would take further measures to ensure the safety of HDB residents.
Our research has also shown that a change can be made in the mindset of Singaporeans. Many of them feel that killer litter is a pressing issue and are willing to change for the better. Perhaps all they need is a little encouragement to deter from committing killer litter for the sake of one’s own convenience and comfort.
In conclusion, we sincerely hope that the government would implement our proposal and ensure the safety of our fellow Singaporeans.
11 | P a g e
Finer Details Of Our Proposal 1. The first solution that we propose is to increase the penalty for cases of killer litter.
Currently, warning letters are first sent to offenders before any fine or punishment is
imposed on them. However, damage could have already been done and thus, we feel that
no warnings should be given and the offender should be fined immediately. Such stringent
and unforgiving punishment would definitely deter people from throwing killer litter. Also,
the current system of punishment for repeat offenders is a $1000 fine. We feel that this is
insufficient and that the penalty for killer litter should also include doing time in prison.
Considering the fact that killer litter endangers the lives and safety of others, it is as bad as
drink‐driving and thus, it is justifiable for the offenders to do time in prison. Perhaps it
would not be for a long time, but the thought of spending time in prison would be a very
strong deterrence and make people think twice before throwing killer litter.
2. The second solution that we are proposing is to conduct frequent spot‐checks around HDB
estates to catch any potential killer litter. There are a few town councils who organize such
spot‐checks but, we feel that the frequency of these checks are not sufficient enough to
deter people from committing this heinous act. Perhaps town councils could assign
volunteers from HDB estates to perform weekly patrol duties around the HDB estates to
spot for killer litter. The town council could also consider allowing the elderly to perform
these duties. There are many active aging citizens in HDB estates and this could be a way to
get them involved in their community. Through this, not only can they maintain an active
lifestyle, they can also make new friends along the way, allowing them to spend their free
time in a very positive way. Town councils could appoint a socially responsible resident as
“litter guard”, who constantly looks out for potential killer litter. Knowing that someone is
keeping an eye on them would deter those tempted to throw killer litter.
3. The final solution that we are proposing is to install an over‐hanging ledge on all HDB flats
under the windows of the apartments. Although this plan is hard to implement, we feel that
it is the most effective and direct solution to killer litter. With this ledge to trap and collect
any falling objects, we can effectively protect residents from killer litter and drastically
reduce the number of casualties from it. If it is feasible, we hope that the government
would not hesitate to implement this as it is a sure way to stop more innocent lives from
being taken by socially irresponsible Singaporeans.
12 | P a g e
As you can see from the diagram above, the ledge is effective in trapping and collecting any rubbish disposed by residents living in high‐rise HDB flats. It can also serve another purpose by providing shelter for the void deck and blocking out any direct sunlight. This would help to keep the void decks cool too. In conclusion, we sincerely hope that the government would appreciate and acknowledge the effort that we have put into our project work and would try its best to implement our proposed solutions.
13 | P a g e
Petition (with signatures)
1. _______________
2. _______________
3. _______________
4. _______________
5. _______________
6. _______________
7. _______________
8. _______________
9. _______________
10. _______________
11. _______________
12. _______________
13. _______________
14. _______________
15. _______________
16. _______________
17. _______________
18. _______________
19. _______________
20. _______________
21. _______________
22. _______________
23. _______________
24. _______________
25. _______________
26. _______________
27. _______________
28. _______________
29. _______________
30. _______________
31. _______________
32. _______________
33. _______________
34. _______________
35. _______________
36. _______________
37. _______________
38. _______________
39. _______________
40. _______________
41. _______________
42. _______________
43. _______________
44. _______________
45. _______________
46. _______________
47. _______________
48. _______________
49. _______________
50. _______________
51. _______________
52. _______________
53. _______________
54. _______________
55. _______________
56. _______________
57. _______________
58. _______________
59. _______________
60. _______________
61. _______________
62. _______________
63. _______________
64. _______________
65. _______________
66. _______________
67. _______________
68. _______________
69. _______________
70. _______________
71. _______________
72. _______________
73. _______________
74. _______________
75. _______________
76. _______________
77. _______________
78. _______________
79. _______________
80. _______________
81. _______________
82. _______________
83. _______________
84. _______________
85. _______________
86. _______________
87. _______________
88. _______________
89. _______________
90. _______________
91. _______________
92. _______________
93. _______________
94. _______________
95. _______________
96. _______________
97. _______________
98. _______________
99. _______________
100. _______________
63 | P a g e
ANNEX 3: Survey Questions
64 | P a g e
Hi, we are a group of students from Raffles Institution. We are currently doing a research
about your awareness and views on killer litter. We would appreciate if you could assist us
in our research by completing this simple survey. Thank you for your time and help!
The survey will be anonymous so please answer as truthfully as possible.Tick the most
appropriate options below.
Gender: Male / Female Age group:
<12 13-18 19-3031-40 41-50 51-6061-70 71-80 >80
Education level (tick)
No qualification PSLE (primary school) Lower secondary (sec 1-3)
N’levels O’level Polytechnic diploma
ITE diploma A’levels University degree
University masters University PH.D
Marital status
Single Married
Widowed Divorced
Income (monthly)
N.A.
Less than 1000
1000-1999
2000-2999
3000-3999
4000-4999
5000-5999
6000-6999
7000-7999
8000-8999
65 | P a g e
9000-9999
10000 and above [Reconsider]
1. Do you know what killer litter is? If yes, please give a brief explanation.
Yes/No
Explanation: _____________________________________________________
2. Are you aware about the numerous cases of killer litter in Singapore? If yes, please list down
some examples.
Yes/ No
Example(s): _________________________________________________________
66 | P a g e
3. Tick the potential killer litter.
67 | P a g e
4. Do you think people throw killer litter intentionally or unintentionally? Intentionally (proceed to question 5a) □ Unintentionally (proceed to question 5b) 5a. What do you think are possible reasons for people throwing killer litter intentionally? Lazy to dispose rubbish properly Think that it is fun to watch the litter drop down Place objects in a dangerous position when they know that the position the object is placed is dangerous Anger / Revenge Others: 5b. What do you think are possible reasons for people throwing killer litter unintentionally? Carelessness Do not know that killer litter would harm people Mental illness or disorder of any kind Misbehaviour of small children Others: 6. Have you noticed the government’s efforts to curb killer litter? Yes, I feel that the government has been doing a lot Yes, but only slightly No, not at all Not interested 7. Do you feel that these efforts have been successful? Yes, they were very successful Yes, they managed to stop certain killer litter cases but there are still many more No, Most people still throw killer litter No, They did not really put in any effort at all
68 | P a g e
8. Have you ever committed killer litter? Yes No If yes, please specify___________________________________________________ Reason for doing so ___________________________________________________ 9. What methods do you think will effectively reduce the frequency of killer litter? Check all that apply. Posters to remind people not to throw killer litter Hold an exhibition on killer litter Organize talks about killer litter Install a shelter on each HDB flat to prevent killer litter from hitting any passersby. Increase penalty for killer litter Others (please specify):_____________________________________________ 10. Do you think killer litter is a pressing issue? Yes/No Reason ___________________________________________________________ 11. If you see any of your neighbours throwing killer litter, would you stop them? Yes No Reason: _________________________________________________________
69 | P a g e
ANNEX 4: Petition for proposal
70 | P a g e