Siliconcarbide Embedded Hybrid Nanocomposites as Abrasion Resistant Coating
-
Upload
osman-arslan -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Siliconcarbide Embedded Hybrid Nanocomposites as Abrasion Resistant Coating
Siliconcarbide Embedded Hybrid Nanocomposites as AbrasionResistant Coating
Osman Arslan • Ertugrul Arpac • Hikmet Sayılkan
Received: 27 December 2009 / Accepted: 2 April 2010 / Published online: 17 April 2010
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010
Abstract Siliconcarbide (SiC) ceramic powder incorpo-
rated inorganic–organic nanocomposites were prepared by
sol–gel spin coating method. Coating properties and abra-
sion resistance of the hybrid polymers were examined by
scanning electron microscopy (SEM), EDX analysis,
FT-IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric differential ther-
mal analysis (TG-DTA). Mechanical tests like surface
static corrosion analysis, abrasion test, scratch-tape test,
adhesion test, chemical and solvent resistance, surface
hardness were performed in order to evaluate the coatings
for possible industrial applications. Prepared polymers
were applied onto the aluminium substrates. Results
revealed that industrially available SiC ceramic powder
incorporated inorganic–organic nanocomposites can be
prepared with an easy and controlled way using sol–gel
method and applied onto the aluminium surfaces by spin
coating without using primer solution and shows excellent
abrasion resistance.
Keywords Abrasion resistant coating � Sol–gel �Hybrid material � Ceramic particle
1 Introduction
Using sol–gel process different inorganic organic hybrid
nanocomposite materials can be prepared from an alk-
oxysilane and a metal alkoxide. This concept is based on
the unusual characteristics of sol–gel reaction for the syn-
thesis of novel materials [1–5]. Sol gel process allows the
introduction of an organic part into an inorganic network
with specific properties. By using different molecules or
precursors, functional materials such as coatings, fibers,
composite materials, aerogels and powders can be obtained
[6–13]. Key factor is the connection and compatibility
between precursors. While silicon alkoxides are not so
reactive in normal room conditions, other transition metal
alkoxides like Ti, Al, Zr, must be protected from the
humidity. Due to their low reactivity silicon alkoxides need
catalyst for controlling and accelerating the hydrolysis and
condensation reactions but on the other hand, transition
metal alkoxides and their derivatives must be used in their
complexed forms for the synthesis of glasses and other
functional materials. Chemical modification of the transi-
tion metal alkoxides with a chelating agent is used to
prevent the precipitation of moisture sensitive precursors
because of their mentioned high activity. After hydrolysis
and condensation reactions of chelated transition metal
alkoxides, controlled and homogeneous mixtures can be
obtained. b-ketoesters, b-diketones and carboxylic acids
are widely used as complexation ligands [14–16].
Sol–gel process gives an easy way for the incorporation
of nanoscaled sols in order to obtain homogeneously dis-
persed materials or coating solutions. Effects of these
nanoscale sols have been extensively investigated and
published [17–19]. Hydrolysis and condensation reactions
of certain precursors or in situ reactions in the matrice can
be used for the incorporation of the particles into the
This work dedicated to the honored memory of the Prof. Dr. Hikmet
Sayılkan who has passed away last year.
O. Arslan (&)
Inorganic and Material Chemistry Department, University
of Cologne, Greinstrasse 6, 30939 Cologne, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
E. Arpac
Chemistry Department, Akdeniz University,
07070 Antalya, Turkey
H. Sayılkan
Department of Science, Inonu University,
44069 Malatya, Turkey
123
J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292
DOI 10.1007/s10904-010-9360-y
matrices [20]. Stability of the particles are vitally important
in order to obtain required properties. Surface charges play
a very important role as the particles must be stabilised for
homogeneous materials. Surface modifiers can also be used
preferentially but neither surface charges nor surface
modifiers are perfect stabilizers.
Nanocomposites as coating material has been developed
from ORMOCERs (ORganically MOdified CERamics) in
many studies which show excellent abrasion resistance,
antifogging, antisoiling, hidrophobic, scratch resistance
properties [21]. In this study we are reporting abrasion
resistant coatings developed for Al surfaces using com-
mercially available ceramic powder (H.C. Starck UF 10
SiC) alternatively. Using both an organoalkoxysilane and a
chelated metal alkoxide a nanocomposite coating material
was prepared and applied onto Al substrates by spin
coating method. Incorporation of commercially available
ceramic powder SiC and its effects on nanocomposite
structure on Al surfaces were investigated. This study is
another report by our group concerning with the incorpo-
ration and coating properties of ceramic particles embed-
ded nanocomposites [22]. As widely known, abrasion
resistant coatings have been used to improve the hardness,
protection and scratch resistance of the different surfaces.
Especially Wilkes, Kasemann, and Schmidt [23–25] syn-
thesized new coating materials from silane-functionalised
precursors which show high resistance to chemicals,
scratching and abrasion. Wilkes prepared inorganic organic
hybrid coatings onto the polycarbonate surfaces from a
trifunctional amine and other alkoxides. Thermally cured
coatings were investigated by the Taber abrader but the
results were relatively poor according to the results pre-
sented here. Cycles were stopped around 200 and abrasion
evaluation was conducted. Additional use of transition
metal alkoxides provided novel coating materials but their
adhesion and abrasion resistance were unpredictable and in
some cases completely different from the desired point.
Schmidt and Nass used a transition metal alkoxide (like Zr
or Ti alkoxide) with an organically silicon alkoxide for
hybrid nanocomposite structures. They also added nano-
sized boehmite particles for increasing the abrasion resis-
tance. Thermally cured coatings shown good abrasion
resistance but abrasion tests were made by haze analysis
and abrasion cycles were only up to the 500. Adhesion of
the coatings were tested according to the standard test
technique which also presented here. Adhesion, scratch and
abrasion resistance were good but because the modified
conditions and different techniques used, nanocomposites
can be simply accepted as positive for the desired appli-
cations. Another important point is the transparency of the
applied coatings. Wilkes, Schmidt and Nass investigated
transparent coatings for contact lenses or organic surfaces
like PC substrates.
In our investigation transparency is not an aim and
decoratif applications are far beyond from the purpose.
Obtained method and coating material is a novel structure
which provided by an industrially available ceramic par-
ticle (SiC) and an alkoxide formulation. Excellent abrasion
resistance up to 1000 cycles proved easy to handle and
industrially applicable coatings can be obtained.
2 Experimental
2.1 Chemicals
For nanocomposite coating materials, commercially avail-
able 3-glycidyloxypropyl trimethoxy silane—this epox-
ysilane will be referred as GLYMO (Degussa)—was used
as matrice. Aluminium tri-seconder butoxide Al(OsBu)3
was purchased from Fluka and used as a co-reactant after
chelated with methyl acetoacetate (Fluka). Methyl aceto-
acetate was used as a complexing ligand for Al(OsBu)3 in
order to control its reactivity. SiC ceramic particles (H.C.
Starck SiC UF-10 Ø: 1.8 lm) were used to increase the
abrasion resistance of the nanocomposite coatings. Coating
solutions have been applied onto 100 9 100 mm Al sub-
strates (Assan aluminium industry, alloy 1050, 0.8 mm Al
plate) by spin coating method. HCl (Merck) and distilled
water were used to start the hydrolysis-condensation
reactions of epoxysilane. Tween 80 (Sigma–Aldrich) was
used for surface modification and stabilisation of SiC
ceramic particles to obtain high homogenity. While epox-
ysilane GLYMO provides surface modification for SiC
powders, Tween 80 has also big effect upon stabilisation of
powders. Coatings which were prepared accidently in the
absence of Tween 80 showed that SiC ceramic particles
tend to agglomeration in the coating solution and inho-
mogeneous coatings were obtained.
2.2 Preparation of Sols
To an Aluminium trisec-butoxide solution, equimolar
amount of methylacetoacetate (MAA) was added, drop-
wise. Then solution was stirred vigorously and cooled in
ice-bath to prevent overwarming. Because of the exother-
mic nature of the complexation reaction, solution should be
kept around room temperature. After complexation, solu-
tion cooled to the room temperature and stirring was car-
ried on. Aluminium complex structure (Fig. 1) allows us to
co-condensation with the epoxysilane leading to hybrid
compound.
3-Glycidyloxypropyl trimethoxy silane (GLYMO) was
prehydrolised with 0.1 M HCl per mole hydrolisable –OR
group and stirred at room temperature for 6–12 h. After
prehydrolysis a clear solution was obtained. During
J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292 285
123
hydrolysis there was no observable difference. The initial
ratio between the OR/H2O was 3/1 at the beginning of the
hydrolysis. Then this ratio was converted to 1/1 by using
0.1 M HCl while particle dispersion was being carried on.
2.3 Preparation of Coating Solution
Prehydrolised epoxysilane (Fig. 2), SiC ceramic particles
(arranging ratios between 5%, 10%, 15%, 18%, 20%, 22%,
25%, 26%, 28%, 30%, 40% and 50%) (H.C. Starck UF 10)
and dispersing agent Tween 80 were mixed together in the
dispersion vessel and dispersion was started. To increase
the homogenity glass roller balls had also been added.
These glass roller balls improve the dispersion of ceramic
powder in the mixtıure. After half an hour additional HCl
solution required for the full hydrolysis-condensation of the
remaining –OR groups was added. Dispersion of these SiC
ceramic particles was carried on for 1.5–2 h with a
mechanical stirrer in the dispersion vessel (Yokes Machine
Industry, Varian 6000 model).
To observe the mixing rate, stirring speed ranged
between 1000 and 3000 rpm. After the glass balls have
been removed by filtration, chelated Al co-reactant was
added and the whole solution was stirred vigorously for
15–20 min. As a surfactant and antifoaming agent BYK-
306 around 6% (BYK-Chemie) and BYK-530 around 5%
(BYKChemie) were used. 10 9 10 Al plates were coated
using spin coating method (Fig. 3).
Every coating was performed within 10 s. Al plates
were rinsed before handling with 5% P3 Almeco solution
at 70 �C. 100 mm 9 100 mm Al plates were dipped into
this solution in an ultrasonic bath and kept there for 5 min.
Afterwards Al plates were washed with pure water and
dried in an oven. P3 Almeco solution is a detergent based
solution which is especially used for degreasing process.
Further rinsing with water provides extra cleaning alu-
minium surfaces for the coating procedure. During spin
coating process spin rates were changing between 750 and
1000 for each coating application. The coatings were
thermally cured at 160–175 �C for 15 min. After coating
Al plates, abrasion, adhesion, corrosion and scratch tests
were performed. Effects of the increasing amount of
ceramic powder and dispersion rate on the quality of
coatings were investigated. The surface characteristics
GLYMO/Al(OsBu)2HacacOMe/SiC UF-10 coating was
monitored using scanning electron microscopy (SEM,
JEOL 6360LV, EDS: Noran System Six). Whole reactions
were confirmed using FT-IR (Bruker Tensor 27) analysis.
Especially functional groups for polymerization were
detected before and after the reactions. The thermal prop-
erties of the coating was observed with thermal analysis
systems using powders prepared from same coating
Keto-Enol form
of
methylacetoacetate
Fig. 1 Complexation of
aluminium trisec-butoxide
O---
R
OH
R---O
OH
O
OOH
OHSi
Si O
O
O
OHSi
OO
OH
OHSi
Si
O
O
O
O
SiO
O
O
O
O
O
O
Si
OR
O
O
O
O
Si
OR
Si
CH3
CH3
CH3
OO
O
O
O Si
H2O, H+
-ROH,-H2O
Fig. 2 Prehydrolysis of GLYMO precursor (R = glycidyloxypropyl)
286 J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292
123
formulation as a reference.(DTA/TGA, Schimadzu Sys-
tem-50 model thermal analyzer). Homogenity and final
structure properties were observed by EDX analysis.
Abrasion resistance was tested with a Taber Abraser (Taber
Industries) 5131 (CS 10F rolls, 5,4 N). Scratch resistance
of the coatings were determined with a Multi Cross Cutter
(Erichsen, type 295), which was pulled over coating with
different weights. Adhesion and scratch behaviour of the
coatings were determined with a lattice cut/tape test
(Erichsen, ASTM D 3359). Corrosion tests were performed
with a Erichsen Corrotherm 610 according to DIN 50021
standard test for 15 days. Durability of coatings against to
acid and base were tested with an Erichsen Static Corrosion
Tester 434 by contacting surfaces with acidic and basic
solutions.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 FT-IR Analysis of Reactions
Epoxysilane hydrolysis first was conducted using 0,1 M
HCl solution. FT-IR analysis of the epoxysilane compound
shows that pure epoxysilane contains no silanol OH-groups
but after hydrolysis, peak around 3371 cm-1 clearly proves
formed silanol groups. Epoxy ring on the organic part was
analyzed by its specific FT-IR absorption. Peak at
906 cm-1 belongs to the epoxy rings stretching peak which
is still available after the first hydrolysis. Presumably
epoxy ring protonated but still in the closed form. Si–C
bond peak appears at between around 1073–900 cm-1 and
probably overlaps with the SiC ceramic powder peak.
Same observation can be seen in nanocomposite hybrid
structure formation (Fig. 4).
Al(OsBu)3/HacacOMe complex formation can be seen
clearly from the correspondent FT-IR spectra. Pure FT-IR
spectra of the methylacetoacetate (HacacOMe) ligand
shows 2t(C=O) stretching band around 1720 and
1710 cm-1 which shift after the complexation with
Al(OsBu)3. High reactivity of Al(OsBu)3 precursor toward
humidity causes small OH-groups in the 3300 cm-1 range
during FT-IR measurement which can be ignored but must
be noted. After modification, the bands of the stretching
vibrations t(C=O) and m(C=C) of the enolic forms of the
b-ketoesters at about 1611 and 1521 cm-1 were detected
(Fig. 5).
Particle embedded polymerization reaction was
observed by reacting mentioned precursors. As can be seen
Dispersant (Tween 80)
Epoxysilane(GLYMO) + HCl
Stirring(6-12 h)
Ceramic Powder addition(H.C.Starck SiC UF-10)
Roller glass balls
Complexing Ligant
Stirring-Cooling
Al (OsBu)3
Al (OsBu)2(HacacOMe) Complex
Dispersion (1-2 h)
Filtration +BYK 530 and BYK 306 addition
Stirring
Co-condensation
Spin Coating on Al
Thermal Curing (160-175 oC)
Fig. 3 Procedure for abrasion
resistant hybrid coatings
J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292 287
123
silanol groups, epoxy ring and carbonyl groups peaks were
slowly disappeared with the increasing heat treatment
period proving suggested hybrid polymer structure forma-
tion. Nanocomposite structure shows great coating material
property and was applied onto the aluminium substrates by
spin coating method (Figs. 6, 7).
3.2 Thermal Properties
TG/DTA analysis provides useful information about the
heat character and limitations about the coatings. TG/DTA
analysis of the coating material were carried out in air from
0 to 950 �C. In Fig. 8a one can see the TGA analysis and in
Fig. 8b its DTA spectra. As can be seen from the TGA
spectra, there is a big weight loss in two steps namely to
around 300 �C (exactly 302 as can be detected from DTA)
and 500 �C until around 800 �C. Below 250 �C, the weight
loss is considered as the evaporation of water, thermal
decomposition and volatilization of some organic mole-
cules. Till 380 �C probably all other organic molecules are
removed. Between 380 and 500 �C weight loss can be
attributed to the beginning of further condensation of
polymeric networks. Groups such as Si–OH, Al–OH start
to further condensation and structures like Si–O–Si, or
Al–O–Si is formed. This formation continues until the
800 �C. After that point there is no remarkable loss in the
weight. Weight loss which can be attributed to this process
is 34%. Further condensation and another exothermic peak
at 500 �C occurs and weight loss is 6%. After that point
another loss is observed till 800 �C. This last loss is around
7%. Total weight loss is 47%. TG/DTA analysis of GLY-
MO/Al(OsBu)2HacacOMe/26%SiC UF-10 shows that
coating material has a good heat resistance up to 300 �C
which providing a big advantage in industrial applications.
3.3 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe
both powder dispersion behaviour of SiC particles in the
hybrid material and surface morphology of coating.
Because of the high conductivity of the Al substrate,
coating properties were investigated using carbon coated
glass plates. Cross sectional SEM pictures of the coating is
shown in Fig. 9. It is obvious that SiC ceramic powders are
highly dispersed in the matrix and the addition of SiC
particles can decrease shrinkage of sol–gel network
smoothly which corresponds to hard and homogeneous
materials. Cracks and holes seen were attributed the diffi-
culties arised during the cross sectional sample preparation
procedure.
3.4 Abrasion Resistance
Table 1 shows the abrasion test results of coatings con-
taining the different amounts of the ceramic particles.
These ceramic particles were incorporated according to the
non-volatile content of the matrix mixture. Simply the
05001000150020002500300035004000
906 cm-1
3371cm-1
1073 cm-1
a b
Fig. 4 FT-IR spectra for (a) pure GLYMO, (b) partly hydrolysed
GLYMO. (Color figure online)
05001000150020002500300035004000
Al(OsBu)2(acacOEt)
HacacOEt
Al(OsBu)3
1726 cm-1
1711 cm-1
1611 cm-1
1518 cm-1
Fig. 5 Al(OsBu)2(HacacOMe) complex formation. (Color figure
online)
0500100015002000250030003500
Cured hybrid polymer
1 min heat before heat
3338 cm-1
901 cm-1
1528 cm-1
Fig. 6 Hybrid inorganic–organic nanocomposite formation. (Color
figure online)
288 J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292
123
weigh content of the whole coating formulation was taken
into consideration. According to the abrasion test results,
resistance against to abrasion can be increased by the
incorporation of the ceramic particles but after a certain
point this property begins to decrease which probably
depends on the carrying capacity of the matrix and the
Fig. 7 Structural model of
hybrid material. (Color figure
online)
Fig. 8 TGA and DTA plots of GLYMO/Al(OsBu)2HacacOMe/26%SiC UF-10. (Color figure online)
Fig. 9 Cross sectional SEM
images of GLYMO/
Al(OsBu)2HacacOMe/26%SiC
UF-10
J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292 289
123
technique used. In order to obtain abrasion test results,
three different coating samples were tested at the same
time and an average value was taken. Same procedure was
followed to get the thickness measurements. Especially
thicker coatings were ignored which possibly mislead the
measurements to be taken and thickness of the coatings
were kept between the standards given. Coating properties
against to abrasion were improved remarkably. Although
non SiC incorporated coatings showed relatively poor
abrasion resistance (abrasion test cycles should have
stopped around 500–600 cycles) SiC embedded nano-
composite coatings abrasion resistance values were
remarkably high. Even 5% incorporation of SiC affected
the abrasion resistance characteristics in a positive manner.
Appearance of the inorganic–organic hybrid coatings were
colorless before the SiC ceramic particles incorporation. As
expected, natural pale yellow-brown color of the SiC
ceramic particles transmitted to the coatings. Naturally, this
yellow-brown color of the coatings were getting darker
with the increasing amount of the incorporated SiC ceramic
particles. Especially handling difficulties arised when
incorporation of the ceramic content increased up to 50%.
Figure 10 shows the graph of weight loss versus amount
of SiC ceramic powder in the hybrid coatings. 26% SiC
ceramic powder containing coating has the best abrasion
result, almost zero (0.3 mg) after subjected to 1000 cycles.
For comparing the abrasion resistance some other values
were also showed in the graph. According to the literature
we know that abrasion resistance of a produced nanocom-
posite from a polymer matrice and nanoparticle is depend
on the interaction of nanoparticles and matrice, tempera-
ture, dispersion rate and speed, particle amount embedded
and surface stabilization due to the ionic or polymeric
environment. Obtained results clearly show that abrasion
resistance of the coatings reach a maximum resistance at a
certain point. Because abrasion resistance of the coatings
depend on the particle–matrix interaction, homogeneity,
curing temperature and particle size as well which was
observed in our previous work, varying the particle amount
would be the reason for the different abrasion character of
the nanocomposite [22]. Among these parameters curing
temperature and particle size must be ignored because they
were all the same. Hence, particle matrice interaction or
inappropriate capping of the particles or local agglomera-
tion could be a reason for a nonlinear change in the abrasion
resistance. Additionally we observed that increasing cera-
mic particle amount causes local viscosity problems pre-
venting the homogenity of the coatings.
3.5 EDX Analysis
Hybrid coatings prepared by the sol–gel process generally
show novel properties. Silicates, aluminates or titanates
which were also connected to a carbon chain, built dense
networks by the polymerisation of this M–O bonds with
hydrolysis-condensation reactions. Additional polymerisa-
tion of the organic part which could be epoxy, unsaturated
Table 1 Results of Taber
abrasion tests%Particle Cycle Loss (±0.1 mg) Thickness (±2 lm) Adhesion Scratch
5 1000 9.2 16 GT/TT = 0 5B
10 1000 1.7 14 GT/TT = 0 5B
15 1000 2.1 17 GT/TT = 0 5B
18 1000 1.5 15 GT/TT = 0 5B
20 1000 3.5 17 GT/TT = 0 5B
22 1000 3.2 13 GT/TT = 0 5B
25 1000 1.7 14 GT/TT = 0 5B
26 1000 0.3 14 GT/TT = 0 5B
28 1000 2.1 15 GT/TT = 0 5B
30 1000 1.6 17 GT/TT = 0 5B
40 1000 4.5 15 GT/TT = 0 5B
50 1000 8.6 16 GT/TT = 0 5B
9,2
0,3
8,6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 2 4 6 8 10
Weight Loss(mg)
Pow
der
Load
(%w
eigh
t)
Fig. 10 Weight loss versus increasing ceramic powder content.
(Color figure online)
290 J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292
123
double bond or isocyanate groups can also be formed. In this
work organic part acting as polyethylene oxide chain which
was prepared from an epoxysilane. Microstructure of the
nanocomposite coating can be seen in Fig. 11. EDX analysis
and spectras of the 4 different regions of the nanocomposite
coating were shown and investigated. This analysis reveals a
big homogenity of the coating composition in different
regions. Every region comprises perfectly distributed silicon
content and supported with different amount of aluminium
and oxygen which could be attributed to different reaction
regions of the precursors. However Na peak arised in the
spectrum can be defined as unwanted Na diffusion from the
glass substrate through the coating which would lead to the
unstable durability of the nanocomposite coating (Fig. 12
and Table 2).
3.6 Adhesion Properties
The scratch and adhesion test was performed according to
the cross cut/tape test of the ASTM D 3359. In this test,
coated surfaces are scratched with the tool of the test to
form the small squares on (Cross hatched test) the surface.
Then the tape is adhered to the surface where those little
squares appear and pulled back strongly. If this process
forms big cracks or removes relatively high coating
material that would be attributed to the weakness of the
adhesion. Tests indicated that all coatings have the 5B
value as the test result for the scratch resistance. After
scratching the freshly coated surface, there were no disin-
tegrations, no wears and no coating material adhered to the
tape. The adhesion of the coatings on Al substrates were
also determined. GT/TT ratio of all coatings were excellent
mean that equal to zero. According to the test it is already
known that if adhesion is excellent GT/TT = 0 and if there
is no adhesion between substrate and coating material
GT/TT = 5. This graduation shows that all coatings have
excellent adhesion even the absence of a primer pre-
application.
Table 1 shows the all GT/TT adhesion and scratching
test values of the coatings. As seen in this table, each of
them are equal to zero which means perfect. This test
showed that these abrasion resistant coatings adhere to Al
surfaces without using any other material which help to
increase the adhesion level of coatings. This is really
important for industrial applications. Without using primer
(chemical compounds which increase surface functionality
and adhesion) these coatings can be applied onto the Al
surfaces to prevent abrasion, scratch and corrosion.
3.7 Corrosion Resistance
Corrosion tests of these nanocomposite coatings were
performed by spraying 5% NaCl solution to coated Al
surfaces under 1–1.5 atm. pressure. Nanocomposite coat-
ings were kept under these conditions for 15 days at 40 �C.
There was no negative effect on color, general appearance,
adhesion after the corrosion test. Surfaces which were
already subjected to humidity beside corrosion, did not
change their properties. This corrosion test provides us a
Fig. 11 Microstructure of the coating. (Color figure online)
Fig. 12 EDX analysis of different regions. (Color figure online)
Table 2 Elemental analysis of the four different coating regions
Compound concentration (%)
C Al Na Si O
Point 1 36.32 1.33 0.96 31.07 30.32
Point 2 44.59 0.73 31.57 23.11
Point 3 41.85 0.81 31.55 25.80
Point 4 38.81 1.72 31.51 27.95
J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292 291
123
general corrosion character of the coatings concerning with
the surface protection. Surfaces did not change their ori-
ginal structure or any cracks, holes occurred. Even though
polarization curves or Electrochemical Impedance Spec-
troscopy (EIS) would provide more quantitative results,
evaluation of the corrosion behaviour of the ceramic
powder incorporated hybrid coatings on metals will be
another detailed investigation. Moreover non SiC ceramic
powder containing pure nanocomposite coatings seem
smoothly affected from this test. All the three blank sam-
ples exposed to this test have quite small white regions on
surface with loss of the clear appearance and relatively
blurry.
3.8 Chemical Durability
Durability of nanocomposite coatings against acids and
bases were tested. Each static corrosion tester 434 basically
contains each of pH 2 and pH 12 solutions in the one
specific test. Coated Al surfaces were placed between
solutions and supporter. These solutions were also heated
to 70 �C in a bath. During 1 h coating surfaces were kept in
contact with these solutions. SiC ceramic particle con-
taining hybrid nanocomposites did not show any negative
effect upon these test procedure meaning they are highly
resistant against to acidic and basic conditions. There were
any crack, hole or any other effect which proves coatings
were negatively effected. Figure 13 shows a simple picture
of this test apparatus. The same procedure was applied to
the non SiC containing pure hybrid coatings. Even though
the observation of smooth color changement on the contact
points it is really hard to specify remarkable differences
between two coating formulation. Still SiC incorporated
nanocomposite coatings could be easily defined acid and
base resistant.
4 Conclusion
Commercially SiC ceramic powders containing inorganic
organic hybrid coatings can be applied onto the Aluminium
substrates with spin coating method and these nanocom-
posite materials provide excellent abrasion, scratch and
corrosion resistance. Tests were revealed that thermal sta-
bilities of these coatings for the curing temperatures are
suitable for industrial applications as well. Inorganic–
organic hybrid polymerization could be monitored by
FT-IR analysis of the precursors. Besides chelated alu-
minium alkoxides can be used as a co-reactant to obtain
particle containing alumina-silicates. Obtained nanocom-
posite structures show desired mechanical character and
these coatings are also resistant to acidic and basic condi-
tions. Obtained results prove that high abrasion resistant
coatings can be prepared with a facile method and their
abrasion, adhesion, scratch properties are highly desirable.
Industrially available SiC ceramic particles is a promising
candidate for the desirable abrasion resistant coatings.
References
1. G. Schoettner, Chem. Mater. 13, 3422 (2001)
2. J. Livage, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2, 132 (1997)
3. C.J. Brinker, G.W. Scherer, The Physics and Chemistry of Sol–Gel Processing, Sect. 14 (1990), pp. 839–870
4. C. Sanchez, F. Ribot, L. Rozes, B. Alonso, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.
354, 143 (2000)
5. H.K. Schmidt, Chem. Unserer Zeit 35, 3, 176–184 (2001)
6. B. Lebeau, C. Sanchez, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 4, 11
(1999)
7. K.H. Haas, H. Wolter, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 4, 571
(1999)
8. J.D. Mackenzie, E.P. Bescher, J. Sol–Gel. Sci. Technol. 13, 371
(1998)
9. S. Hofacker, M. Mechtel, M. Magerb, H. Kraus, Prog. Org. Coat.
45, 159–164 (2002)
10. H.K. Schmidt, M. Mennig, R. Nonninger, P.W. Oliveira, H.
Schirra, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 576 (1999)
11. R. Sui, A.S. Rizkalla, P.A. Charpentier, J. Phys. Chem. B
108(32), 11886 (2004)
12. T. Muromachi, T. Tsujino, K. Kamitani, K. Maeda, J. Sol–Gel.
Sci. Technol. 40, 267 (2006)
13. G. Reichenauer, G.W. Scherer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 285, 167–
174 (2001)
14. R. Nass, H. Schmidt, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 121, 329 (1990)
15. D. Hoebbel, T. Reinert, H. Schmidt, E. Arpac, J. Sol–Gel. Sci.
Technol. 10, 115 (1997)
16. G. Wagner, Diplomarbeit: ‘‘Synthese aluminiumhaeltiger-anorganisch-organisch nanocomposite nach dem sol-gel ver-fahren’’ (Institute fur Neue Materialen (INM), University of
Saarland, Saarbruecken, 1992)
17. E. Geiter, Ph.D. thesis, University of Saarland, Germany, 1997
18. J.E. Mark, Polym. Eng. Sci. 36, 2905 (2004)
19. H.K. Schmidt, Macromol. Symp. 101, 333 (1996)
20. H.K. Schmidt, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 178, 302 (1994)
21. H.K. Schmidt, P. Oliveira, S. Sepeur, 9th Cimtec—WorldCeramics Congress Ceramics: Getting into te 2000’s—Part C,
vol. 451 (1999)
22. O. Arslan, E. Arpac, F. Sayilkan, H. Sayilkan, J. Mater. Sci. 42,
2138 (2007)
23. K. Jordens, G. Wilkes, J. Macromol. Sci., Pure Appl. Chem. A
38(2), 185–207 (2001)
24. J. Wen, V.J. Vasudevan, G.L. Wilkes, J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 5,
115–126 (1995)
25. R. Kasemann, H. Schmidt, E. Wintrich, J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 346,
915 (1994)
4 coatings can be tested at the same time
Fig. 13 Static corrosion apparatus. (Color figure online)
292 J Inorg Organomet Polym (2010) 20:284–292
123