SICC 2016 business strategy case
-
Upload
allison-noel -
Category
Business
-
view
465 -
download
0
Transcript of SICC 2016 business strategy case
12016 SICC CASE COMPETITION MAY 25, 2016
THE ROAD TO VALUESTRATEGIC ANALYSIS FOR FORESIGHT AUTO
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 2
ALLISON NOEL
SAPNA HEGDE
CODYBECKER
RJNIEWOEHNER
RADY SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENTUC SAN DIEGO
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 3
THANK YOU TO OUR SUPPORTERS!
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 4
OPPORTUNITYCREATING VALUE AND MAKING A DIFFERENCE
colleague father friend
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 5
Establish a partnership with Mobileye to leverage expertise, market power, and OEM contacts
Seek strategic alignment with OEMs and other Tier 1 & 2 vendors
Continue to innovate on stereo vision expertise while monitoring evolving market trends
RECOMMENDATION
OPPORTUNITY FOR FURTHER GROWTH
1.
2.
3.
+ approx.$ 1.3 Billion
ANNUAL REVENUE
WITHIN 5 YEARS OF REACHING PROFITABILITY
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 6
TABLE OF CONTENTSIndustry analysis and trends
Company analysis
Strategic alternatives
Marketing plan
Risk factors
Financials
Summary
7
ADAS INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTERAS OF AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY TECHNOLOGY
1950-2000
Ph 2
Ph I
ADASSAFETY & CONVENIENCE
2000-present 2016-2025 2025+PARTIALLY
AUTONOMOUS AUTONOMOUS
Zzz
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 8
ADAS INDUSTRY TRENDSGROWTH AND DIRECTION
KEY DRIVERS OF GROWTH• Technological breakthroughs• New business models• Consumer interest penetration• Regulatory mandates• UN Decade of Action for Road Safety• Vision of autonomous driving
ATTRACTIVE MARKET, RIPE WITH
OPPORTUNITY
2015 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E$0$10$20$30$40$50$60$70$80$90
ADAS INDUSTRY GROWTH ($ BILLIONS)analyst estimates
Strategy Analytics TechNavio ABI Research
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 9
COMPANIES ACTIVELY PURSUING ADAS
ESTABLISHED EMERGING
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 10
FORESIGHT AUTOCORE COMPETENCIES AND DIFFERENTIATING FACTORS
continuingR&D
technology
R&Dsuperior
technology
raising money
hardware agnostic
FORESIGHT IS UNIQUELY POSITIONED TO…
• Deliver differentiated value
• Gain end-user trust• Work with any partner• Remain a strong
innovator
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 11
COMPETITIVE THREAT ANALYSISBUYER POWE
R
SUPPLIER
POWER
THREAT OF SUBSTITUT
ES
THREAT OF NEW
ENTRANTSCOMPETITIVE RIVALRY
BUYERS- MEDIUM -
OEMs and Tier1 suppliers are
large and command market
power; many potential partners
Foresight has a unique solution
SUPPLIERS- LOW -
Foresight has reliable access to
human capital and parent company IP
SUBSTITUTES- LOW -
Capabilities of alternatives such as LIDAR, radar,
ultrasonic, and IR are more limited
NEW ENTRY- LOW -
Development of Eyes On involved extensive R&D
leading to patents barrier to entry in the
near term
COMPETITORS- HIGH -
Industry is fragmented
Lots of players
Established partnerships & relationships
THIS INDUSTRY IS INTENSELY COMPETITIVE & REQUIRES ESTABLISHMENT OF KEY RELATIONSHIPS
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 12
ANALYSIS OF LEADING STRATEGIES
CRITERIA
#1: PARTNER
WITH MOBILEY
E
#2:NETWOR
K BROADLY WITHIN ADAS
#3SMART PHONE DEV.
MARKETGrowth opportunity
Mitigates competitive risks
FIT Aligns with core competencies/values
FINANCIALSLong-term stability & exit opps.
Guarantee of high financial returns
PURSUE STRATEGIE
S 1 & 2+
MONITOR SMART PHONE MARKET
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 13
CONNECTING WITH MOBILEYE
Approach leadership with partnership proposal (VP of Automotive Projects, Advanced Technology, or R&D)
Discuss capability improvement from integration of Foresight software–lower rate of false positives, improved maps based on crowdsourced data, improved tagging, etc.
Seek opportunities to integrate within the party’s current OEM customer base
1.
2.
3.
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 14
PRIORITIZING T1 PARTNERS TO NETWORK WITHTIER 1 SUPPLIER SOFTWARE PARTNER
+
+ in-house
PRIORITY
in-house
high
high
medium
medium
medium
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 15
Trend: OEMs and Tier 1s are looking for & investing in start-
ups
Action: Connect by getting involved with accelerators and
incubators they participate in (e.g., speak at events)
Clean Tech Open Sponsor list
“Israel itself is a hotbed for innovation, Buczkowski said. Ford has scouts there on the lookout for new technologies”
“Buczkowski cited Mobileye”
CONNECTING WITH OEMs & TIER 1s
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 16
PRIORITIZING T2 PARTNERS TO WORK WITHTIER 2 SUPPLIER DESCRIPTION PRIORITY
high
high
high
medium
Strong and well established OEM relationships; lacks stereo vision
Strong mobile presence; reference design expertise; looking for differentiation
Strong expertise in facial recognition and real-time feedback
Preference for open source
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 17
Trend: Chipset vendors are looking for differentiation and
value-add
Action: For example, talk with Qualcomms
Advanced Optional Software Group
CONNECTING WITH TIER 2s
18
MARKETING PLAN
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION
NURTUREMARKET
IDENTIFICATION
CREATE SALES OPPORTUNITIE
SPOSITION
Highlight uniqueness:• No false positives• Depth perception• Hardware agnostic• Military heritage• All-weather
Capture opportunities in ADAS and partial
autonomous technology
Develop solutions for autonomous
technology
Get involved with
accelerators and incubators
Sustain key long-term relationships
through exceeding
expectations and expanding
product offering
Attend conferences
and tradeshows
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 19
RISK ANALYSISPOLITICAL
ECONOMIC
SOCIAL
TECHNOLOGICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
LEGAL
Low risk:governments interested in
furthering transportation
safetyHigh risk:
intense competition can erode industry
opportunities and profits
Medium risk: consumer
reactions are difficult to
predict, and trust is easily
lostLow risk:
hardware agnostic with superior R&D
and intellectual capital
Low risk: climate change concerns could lower car use, but effect is likely small
Medium risk:Errors could
significantly harm users and lead to
litigation – probability uncertain
FOCUS ON COMPETING AGRESSIVELY TO MITIGATE LARGEST RISK
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 20
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023$0
$200,000,000
$400,000,000
$600,000,000
$800,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$1,200,000,000
$1,400,000,000
PROJECTED REVENUES ($ millions)
*
PROJECTED 5-YR REVENUES
TOP-DOWN MODEL• Market size: P&S Research; IndustryARC• Foresight share: 0.25% 1.0%• Market growth: 2% (auto industry)
2023REV $1.3B
KEY INPUTS & ASSUMPTIONS
BOTTOM-UP MODEL• Base of installed cars: Frost & Sullivan• ADAS Market growth: IndustryARC• Market share: 0.25% 1.0%• R & D expenses: Mobileye
***
*
*
Top-down model estimatesBottom-up model estimates
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 21
FINANCIAL RESOURCES REQUIRED
YearR&D(Mil)
SG&A(Mil)
Data Source
2016 3.5$ 0.9$ Burn rate of $4.4 M/yr2017 10.6$ 2.6$ Burn rate of $13.2 M/yr (tripled from 2016) 2018 31.7$ 7.9$ Burn rate of $39.6 M/yr (tripled from 2017) 2019 28.6$ 27.2$ 2020 59.9$ 59.9$ 2021 127.5$ 127.5$ 2022 174.0$ 174.0$ 2023 216.1$ 216.1$
% of expense based on 2013 Mobileye financial statement
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 22
RECOMMENDATION & MILESTONES
Establish a partnership with Mobileye to leverage expertise, market power, and OEM contacts
Seek strategic alignment with OEMs and other Tier 1 & 2 vendors
Continue to innovate on stereo vision expertise while monitoring evolving market trends
OPPORTUNITY FOR FURTHER GROWTH
1.
2.
3.
+ approx.$1.3 Billion
Begin talks with potential partners
Establish POC
Secure first partnership
Y1 – PRODUCT & MARKET FIT Expand offerings
(e.g., AEB)
Y2-5 – SCALESecure additional
partnershipsBecome a top 3 market leader
ANNUAL REVENUE
WITHIN 5 YEARS OF REACHING PROFITABILITY
232016 SICC CASE COMPETITION MAY 25, 2016
THANK YOU!
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 24
DETAILED FINANCIALS2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total WTP for ADAS features 1,210$ 1,210$ 1,210$ 1,210$ 1,210$ 1,210$ 1,210$ 1,210$ 1,210$ Global base of cars with ADAS (Mil) 25$ 28$ 32$ 37$ 43$ 49$ 57$ 65$ 75$ Total ADAS Revenue (Mil) 29,734$ 34,165$ 39,256$ 45,105$ 51,825$ 59,547$ 68,420$ 78,614$ 90,328$ ADAS Revenue for Camera solutions 6,839$ 7,858$ 9,029$ 10,374$ 11,920$ 13,696$ 15,737$ 18,081$ 20,775$ % of Camera solutions that are Stereo 1% 2% 5% 10% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%ADAS Revenue for Stereo solutions (Mil) 68$ 157$ 451$ 1,037$ 2,384$ 3,424$ 4,721$ 6,328$ 8,310$ ADAS Market share for Foresight 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% 0.50% 3.00% 5.00% 9.00% 11.00% 13.00%Foresight Revenue (Mil) 0 0 0 0 71.5$ 171.2$ 424.9$ 696.1$ 1,080.3$ % of Revenue spent on R & D 0 0 0% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20%R & D Expenses (Mil) 4$ 11$ 32$ 29$ 60$ 127$ 174$ 216$
% of Revenue spent on S,G & A 0 0 0 38% 35% 30% 25% 20%S,G&A Expenses (Mil) 1$ 3$ 8$ 27$ 60$ 127$ 174$ 216$ Total expenses (Mil) 4$ 13$ 40$ 56$ 120$ 255$ 348$ 432$ EBITDA (Mil) -$ (4.40)$ (13.20)$ (39.60)$ 15.73$ 51.36$ 169.95$ 348.06$ 648.19$
2016 SICC CASE COMPETITION 25
ADAS VALUE CHAINTHREE ROUTES TO THE OEM
software vendor OEM1.
2. software vendor
software vendor3.
tier 1 supplier OEM
SoC vender tier 1 supplier OEM