Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

44
Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen Lee October 29, 2015

Transcript of Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Page 1: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Show Me the Data

PART 2

Chris Lysy & Shen Lee

October 29, 2015

Page 2: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 3: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

A quick overview

This session: Last week’s homework New chart variations Infographics and interactives

Future: Take home homework What help would you like?

Page 4: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Horizontal bar

Page 5: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Horizontal bar

Page 6: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Horizontal bar highlighted

Page 7: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Stacked bar

Page 8: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Stacked bar

Page 9: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

100% stacked bar

Page 10: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

100% stacked bar

Page 11: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Line chart

Page 12: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Line chart

Page 13: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Tutorial: Slope Graph

Measure A

Measure B

Measure C

Measure D

Measure E

Measure F

Measure G

Measure H

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

High Middle

Page 14: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Tutorial: Slope Graph

Middle High

Measure A 25

27

Measure B 21

26

Measure C 9

14

Measure E 1718

Measure F 15

19

Measure G 13

17

Measure H 19

23Measure D 23

21

Measure D decreased from middle to high.All other measures increased.

Page 15: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Tutorial: Diverging Stacked Bars

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 50%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

39%

51%53%

74%77%

61%

49%47%

26%24%

NoYes

Page 16: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Tutorial: Diverging Stacked Bars

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

No

39%

51%

53%

74%

77%

Yes

61%

49%

47%

26%

24%

Most respondents chose "Yes" on Question 1.For all other questions, more than half chose "No".

Page 17: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 18: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 19: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 20: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 21: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 22: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 23: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 24: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 25: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 26: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 27: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 State

(a) - Did Not Im-prove

0 0 1.315789473684

21

0 0 0.564174894217

207

0 0 2.116402116402

12

0.439947206335

24

(b) - Im-proved but Not Comparable

28.03738317757

01

32.43243243243

24

24.34210526315

79

17.35537190082

64

30.61889250814

33

17.77150916784

2

23.83720930232

56

31.21387283236

99

25.92592592592

59

23.97712274527

06

(c) - Im-proved and Nearer to Peers

5.607476635514

02

5.405405405405

41

4.605263157894

74

4.958677685950

41

3.583061889250

81

2.961918194640

34

8.720930232558

14

1.734104046242

77

4.232804232804

23

4.179498460184

78

(d) - Im-proved and Comparable

17.75700934579

44

25.67567567567

57

21.71052631578

95

14.04958677685

95

16.93811074918

57

12.27080394922

43

28.48837209302

33

20.23121387283

24

11.64021164021

16

17.06995160580

73

(e) - Maintained

48.59813084112

15

36.48648648648

65

48.02631578947

37

63.63636363636

36

48.85993485342

02

66.43159379407

62

38.95348837209

3

46.82080924855

49

56.08465608465

61

54.33347998240

21

10

30

50

70

90

Regional Grantee

Pe

rce

nt

Page 28: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Region 7

Region 13

Region 10

Region 15

Region 1

Region 8

Region 12

Region 11

Region 9

Statewide

32

31

31

26

28

24

24

18

17

24

(b) Improved but Not Comparable

5

2

4

4

6

5

9

3

5

4

(c) Improved andNearer to Peers

26

20

17

12

18

22

28

12

14

17

(d) Improved andComparable

36

47

49

56

49

48

39

66

64

54

(e) Maintained

2

1

1

<1

(a) Did Not Improve

Indicator C3A: Outcome A: Percent of Infants and Toddlers With IFSPs Who Demonstrated Improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills, Including Social Relationships in All Categories

Page 29: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Indicator C3A Summary Statement 1: Percent of Infants and Toddlers With IFSPs Who Substantially Increased Rate of Growth in Positive Social-Emotional Skills, Including Social Relationships, by Regional Grantee [Formula: (c+d) / (a+b+c+d)].

1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 State 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 State

2011-2012 46.26865671641

79

43.03030303030

3

50.76923076923

08

43.80165289256

2

40 35.07109004739

34

53.98230088495

58

48.45360824742

27

41.93548387096

77

43.35532516493

87

2012-2013 45.56962025316

46

46.91358024691

36

38.54166666666

67

50.57471264367

82

41.24293785310

73

39.00414937759

34

53.33333333333

33

36.90476190476

19

41.02564102564

1

43.32740213523

13

2013-2014 45.45454545454

55

48.93617021276

6

50.63291139240

51

52.27272727272

73

40.12738853503

19

45.37815126050

42

60.95238095238

1

41.30434782608

7

36.14457831325

3

46.53179190751

45

Target 44.63 44.63 44.63 44.63 44.63 44.63 44.63 44.63 44.63 44.63

10

30

50

70

90

Regional Grantee

Per

cent

Page 30: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Series1

2013-2014

Series1

2012-2013

2011-2012

Target 44.63

Statewide

Region 12

Region 9

Region 8

Region 7

Region 11

Region 13

Region 10

Region 15

Region 1

Indicator C3A Summary Statement 1: Percent of Infants and Toddlers With IFSPs Who Substantially Increased Rate of Growth in Positive Social-Emotional Skills, Including Social Relationships, by Regional Grantee [Formula: (c+d) / (a+b+c+d)].

Page 31: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 32: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 33: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 34: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 35: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 36: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 37: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 38: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 39: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 40: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.
Page 41: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

Homework!

Here’s your assignment: Using the Excel file, simplify the graphs Try to change the graphs on the left to

the ones on the right There is no follow-up, so if you need

help, send us an email Here’s how to reach us:

[email protected] [email protected]

Page 42: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

QUESTIONS?

Page 43: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

For More Information

Visit the IDC website http://ideadata.org/

Follow us on Twitterhttps://twitter.com/ideadatacenter

Page 44: Show Me the Data PART 2 Chris Lysy & Shen LeeOctober 29, 2015.

The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant

from the U.S. Department of Education, #H373Y130002. However,

the contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department

of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the

Federal Government.

Project Officers: Richelle Davis and Meredith MiceliMiceli

Project Officers: Richelle Davis and Meredith Miceli