Short title: OsGRF7 shapes rice plant architecture · 2020. 6. 24. · in determining the...
Transcript of Short title: OsGRF7 shapes rice plant architecture · 2020. 6. 24. · in determining the...
1
Short title: OsGRF7 shapes rice plant architecture 1
2
Rice GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR7 Modulates Plant Architecture 3
through Regulating GA and IAA Metabolism 4
Yunping Chena, 2
, Zhiwu Dana, 2
, Feng Gaoa, 3
, Pian Chena, Fengfeng Fan
a & Shaoqing 5
Lia, 4, 5
6
7
a State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, Key Laboratory for Research and Utilization 8
of Heterosis in Indica Rice of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Life Sciences, 9
Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China. 10
11
One-sentence summary 12
A transcriptional regulator maintains compact plant architecture and decreased leaf 13
angle by regulating gibberellin synthesis and auxin signaling pathways. 14
15
Footnotes: 16
Author contributions 17
Y.C. and S.L. conceived and designed the research. Y.C. and Z.D. performed most of 18
the experiments and analyzed the data. F.G. performed overexpression and RNAi 19
vector construction, 5ꞌ RACE. P.C. performed the GRF7-GFP transgenic experiment. 20
Y.C., Z.D., and F.F. performed field experiments. Y.C., Z.D., and S.L. wrote the 21
manuscript. 22
23
1 This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development 24
Program (2016YFD0100903), the National Transgenic Research and Development 25
Program (2016ZX08001004-001-002) and the National Natural Science Foundation 26
(31870322) of China. 27
2 These authors contributed equally to this work. 28
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on June 24, 2020, as DOI:10.1104/pp.20.00302
Copyright 2020 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
3 Present address: Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of 29
Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil 30
Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430072, China. 31
4 Senior author. 32
5 Author for contact: [email protected]. 33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
Abstract 59
Plant-specific GROWTH-REGULATING FACTORs (GRFs) participate in central 60
developmental processes, including leaf and root development; inflorescence, flower 61
and seed formation; senescence; and tolerance to stresses. In rice (Oryza sativa), there 62
are 12 GRFs, but the role of the miR396-OsGRF7 regulatory module remains 63
unknown. Here, we report that OsGRF7 shapes plant architecture via the regulation of 64
auxin and gibberellin metabolism in rice. OsGRF7 is mainly expressed in lamina 65
joints, nodes, internodes, axillary buds, and young inflorescences. Overexpression of 66
OsGRF7 causes a semidwarf and compact plant architecture with an increased culm 67
wall thickness and narrowed leaf angles mediated by shortened cell length, altered cell 68
arrangement, and increased parenchymal cell layers in the culm and adaxial side of 69
the lamina joints. Knock-out and knock-down lines of OsGRF7 exhibit contrasting 70
phenotypes with severe degradation of parenchymal cells in the culm and lamina 71
joints at maturity. Further analysis indicated that OsGRF7 binds the ACRGDA motif 72
in the promoters of Cytochrome P450 gene (OsCYP714B1) and AUXIN RESPONSE 73
FACTOR 12 (OsARF12), which are involved in the gibberellin synthesis and auxin 74
signaling pathways, respectively. Correspondingly, OsGRF7 alters the contents of 75
endogenous gibberellins and auxins and sensitivity to exogenous phytohormones. 76
These findings establish OsGRF7 as a crucial component in the 77
OsmiR396-OsGRF-plant hormone regulatory network that controls rice plant 78
architecture. 79
80
Keywords: plant architecture, OsGRF7, transcription factor, rice, gibberellin, auxin 81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
89
Introduction 90
Plant architecture is a major factor that determines grain productivity in cereal crop 91
species (Wang and Li, 2008). Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food for more than 92
half of the global population, and rice plant architecture has been continually 93
improved by breeders to achieve high productivity. Rice plant architecture is mainly 94
defined by plant height, the spatial pattern of leaves, and tiller and inflorescence 95
branching patterns (Khush, 1995). Plant height and tiller branching determine the 96
biomass and harvest index, while the spatial pattern of leaves, including leaf shape 97
and angle, influences the photosynthesis rate and therefore the accumulation of 98
carbohydrates (Sinclair and Sheehy, 1999; Springer, 2010; Xing and Zhang, 2010). 99
During plant architecture determination, several factors, especially plant hormones, 100
have been reported to affect the development of the leaf angle, plant height, and tiller 101
number, thus modulating rice plant architecture. 102
Phytohormones regulate many physiological processes that largely influence 103
growth, differentiation, and development (Luo et al., 2016). Auxins and cytokinins 104
mainly control the size and number of plant leaves, culms, inflorescences, and grains 105
by regulating cell size and number (Lavy and Estelle, 2016; Schaller et al., 2015). 106
Auxins also negatively control lamina joint inclination via asymmetric adaxial-abaxial 107
cell division (Zhang et al., 2015). Consistent with these findings, the auxin early 108
response gain-of-function rice mutant leaf inclination1, lc1-D, which encodes the IAA 109
amido synthetase OsGH3-1, showed reduced free auxin levels and enlarged leaf 110
angles due to stimulated cell elongation on the adaxial side of the lamina joints (Zhao 111
et al., 2013). Overexpression of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 19 (OsARF19) resulted 112
in an enlarged leaf angle via increased expression level of GH3s and decreased free 113
IAA content (Zhang et al., 2015). Gibberellins control plant height and tillering by 114
regulating cell elongation and cell division (Gao et al., 2016; Kobayashi et al., 1988; 115
Magome et al., 2013). Blocking the synthesis of gibberellin reduces plant height and 116
therefore increases lodging resistance (Chen et al., 2015; Sasaki et al., 2002). Thus, 117
the integration of multiple phytohormone signaling pathways will appropriately 118 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
coordinate plant architecture development. 119
Increasing evidence indicates that miRNAs also participate in hormone synthesis 120
or signal transduction and plant development (Tang and Chu, 2017). miR396 is one of 121
the most conserved miRNA families in monocots and dicots (Liu et al., 2009). Studies 122
have shown that repressing the expression of OsmiR396 in miR396 mimicry 123
(MIM396) transgenic lines resulted in enlarged panicles (Gao et al., 2015). GRFs, the 124
targets of OsmiR396, are conserved, plant-specific transcription factors. In rice, the 125
GRF family comprises 12 members. All GRF genes have the conserved QLQ and 126
WRC domains in their N-terminal regions. The QLQ domain is essential for 127
protein-protein interaction, and the WRC domain contains a functional nuclear 128
localization signal (Choi et al., 2004). 129
GRFs interact with small cofactors called GRF-INTERACTING FACTORs 130
(GIFs) to form a functional complex to regulate plant growth and development (Kim 131
and Kende, 2004). GIFs have been reported to participate in cell proliferation during 132
leaf development, root meristem homeostasis, and grain size determination (Ercoli et 133
al., 2018; Kim and Kende, 2004; Li et al., 2016). In rice, the GIF family is composed 134
of three members: OsGIF1, OsGIF2, and OsGIF3. OsGRF6 interacts with these three 135
OsGIFs to regulate inflorescence architecture (Gao et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2014), 136
OsGRF10 interacts with OsGIF1 and OsGIF2 to regulate floral organogenesis (Liu et 137
al., 2014), and OsGRF4 interacts with OsGIF1 to regulate grain size (Li et al., 2016). 138
These findings highlight the crucial roles of the OsmiR396-OsGRFs-OsGIFs module 139
in determining the complexity of the regulatory network of rice growth and 140
development. 141
In this study, we report that OsGRF7 and OsmiR396e form a molecular node that 142
regulates plant architecture via hormone-related genes, including OsARF12 (Li et al., 143
2020; Wang et al., 2014) and OsCYP714B1 (Magome et al., 2013), which are 144
involved in the auxin signaling pathway and gibberellin synthesis, respectively. In 145
vivo and in vitro assays indicate that these genes are directly regulated by OsGRF7. 146
OsGRF7 also alters the contents of corresponding endogenous phytohormones and 147
sensitivity to exogenous phytohormones. Our study demonstrates that OsGRF7 is a 148 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
critical regulator of the shaping of plant architecture through GA and IAA signaling 149
networks. 150
151
Results 152
OsGRF7 modulates plant architecture in rice 153
A previous study showed that OsmiR396 regulates rice inflorescence branching and 154
grain yield by modulating the expression of OsGRF6 (Gao et al., 2015). Here, we 155
observed that MIM396 transgenic lines presented compact plant architecture. The leaf 156
angle of the MIM396 transgenic lines was reduced by 26.9% at the seedling stage 157
compared with that of the wild-type YuetaiB (YB) (Supplemental Fig. S1A, B). A 158
similar phenotype was also observed for the second and third fully expanded leaves 159
from the top of MIM396 plants at the tillering stage (Supplemental Fig. S1C-E). 160
Corresponding to the significant decrease in the abundance of OsmiR396 family 161
members in MIM396-3 transgenic lines (Supplemental Fig. S1F), and the expression 162
levels of GRF family members, especially OsGRF7, were significantly increased 163
(Supplemental Fig. S1G). 164
To elucidate the functions of OsGRF7, we performed a genetic transformation of 165
OsGRF7 and found that seven out of 13 OsGRF7 overexpression (GRF7OE) lines and 166
four out of six OsGRF7 RNAi (GRF7RNAi) lines showed altered plant architecture 167
(Fig. 1A, B). Compared with that of the WT, the plant height of the GRF7OE lines 168
was reduced by approximately 20% (Fig. 1A; Supplemental Table S1), corresponding 169
to the contraction of each internode in the GRF7OE lines (Supplemental Fig. S2A, B). 170
The flag leaf angles of the WT as well as the GRF7OE-1, GRF7OE-2, 171
GRF7RNAi-1, and GRF7RNAi-2 transgenic lines were 5.5, 1.9, 1.3, 9.5, and 6.3, 172
respectively (Fig. 1B; Supplemental Table S1). Moreover, the plant height, effective 173
panicle, leaf angle, leaf length and width, were strongly correlated with the relative 174
expression levels of OsGRF7 in the transgenic plants (Supplemental Fig. S3), 175
meaning that OsGRF7 regulates plant architecture in a dose-dependent manner. 176
We further crossed GRF7RNAi-1 with MIM396-3 and found that the leaf angles 177
were significantly decreased in the GRF7RNAi-1/MIM396-3 hybrid compared with 178 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
those in the GRF7RNAi-1 (Supplemental Fig. S4A, B). The first fully expanded leaf 179
angles from the top of the main stalk decreased from 17.4 in the GRF7RNAi-1 180
transgenic lines to 12.6 in the GRF7RNAi-1/MIM396-3 hybrid, and the third fully 181
expanded leaf angles decreased from 26.5 in the GRF7RNAi-1 transgenic lines to 182
16.7 in the GRF7RNAi-1/MIM396-3 hybrid (Supplemental Fig. S4C, D), suggesting 183
that OsmiR396-OsGRF7 is involved in leaf angle determination. 184
To further validate the function of OsGRF7 in rice plant architecture 185
determination, 74 independent OsGRF7 knock-out (GRF7KO) lines were generated 186
using CRISPR/Cas9 against two target sites within the second exon of OsGRF7 187
(Supplemental Fig. S5A). After sequence identification, we obtained four independent 188
GRF7KO homologous lines in which OsGRF7 was prematurely terminated 189
(Supplemental Fig. S5A and Supplemental Table S2). Consistent with the leaf angles 190
of the GRF7RNAi transgenic lines, the angles of the second leaves of GRF7KO-2, 191
GRF7KO-14, GRF7KO-64, and GRF7KO-66 mutants were 27.6, 26.1, 32.9, and 192
36.1, respectively (Supplemental Fig. S5B-D), which are significantly larger than 193
those of the WT line (14.8). After analyzing the plant height of GRF7KO lines, we 194
found that the plant height of GRF7KO lines was significantly increased when 195
compared with the WT (Supplemental Fig. S5B, E). These results demonstrate that 196
OsGRF7 is a critical node for plant architecture determination in rice. 197
GRFs are conserved and plant-specific transcription factors. Phylogenetic 198
analysis of the GRFs from rice and Arabidopsis showed that OsGRF7 was closely 199
related to the Arabidopsis homologs AtGRF1 and AtGRF2 (Supplemental Fig. S6). 200
After analyzing the mRNA expression of OsGRFs in the OsGRF7 transgenic lines, we 201
found that when OsGRF7 was downregulated, multiple OsGRFs showed increased 202
expression levels, especially OsGRF4, OsGRF6, OsGRF8, and OsGRF9 203
(Supplemental Fig. S7). At the same time, OsGRF4, OsGRF6, OsGRF8, and OsGRF9, 204
shared similar expression patterns with OsGRF7 (Choi et al., 2004), suggesting that 205
these GRFs may compensate for the loss of OsGRF7 in the GRF7RNAi and GRF7KO 206
lines. 207
208 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
OsGRF7 promotes periclinal division in lamina joints and internodes 209
To clarify the cellular mechanism of OsGRF7 in the control of plant architecture, we 210
observed the microstructure of the uppermost internodes and lamina joints. The 211
results showed that GRF7OE-1 plants had more cell layers in the uppermost internode 212
than WT and GRF7RNAi-1 plants (Fig. 1C). Longitudinal sections revealed that the 213
internode parenchymal cells of the GRF7OE-1 plants were not only shorter but also 214
rounder than those of the WT and GRF7RNAi-1 lines (Fig. 1C, D), and the culm wall 215
thickness of the GRF7OE-1 plants was significantly increased compared with that of 216
the WT (Fig. 1E), corresponding to the short, sturdy, and thick culm of the former 217
(Fig. 1A). 218
Leaf angle increases after the lamina joint emerges from the prior leaf sheath. 219
After analyzing the dynamic lamina joint growth from lamina joint initiation to the 220
maturation of the flag leaf, we found that the GRF7OE-1 transgenic lines showed 221
enlarged vascular bundles during the lamina joint development stage, while 222
GRF7RNAi-1 and GRF7KO-14 showed the opposite phenotype (Supplemental Fig. 223
S8). Additional examination of cross-sections and longitudinal sections of the lamina 224
joints revealed that, compared with the WT and GRF7RNAi-1 plants, the GRF7OE-1 225
plants showed enhanced adaxial cell proliferation and repressed cell elongation (Fig. 226
1F, G), suggesting that overexpression of OsGRF7 promoted the cell periclinal 227
division on the adaxial side of the lamina joint, and thus increased cell layers on the 228
adaxial side that caused narrow lamina joint bending (Fig. 1B), and the compact 229
phenotype of GRF7OE-1 plants. 230
231
OsGRF7 is mainly repressed by OsmiR396e 232
GRFs are known to be highly regulated by miR396 (Omidbakhshfard et al., 2015). 233
Here, we found that OsmiR396 could directly cleave OsGRF7 mRNA in vivo at the 234
site within the OsmiR396 pairing region (Fig. 2A). Moreover, we performed transient 235
expression assays of OsGRF7 using the OsmiR396-sensitive construct 35S:OsGRF7 236
and the OsmiR396-resistant construct 35S:OsrGRF7 in rice protoplasts under the 237
background of OsmiR396s (Fig. 2A). RT-qPCR analysis showed that the transcript 238 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
level of OsGRF7 significantly decreased when OsmiR396-sensitive OsGRF7 was 239
coexpressed with OsmiR396s, which contrasted with the slight decrease in OsGRF7 240
under the background of OsrGRF7 together with coexpression of OsmiR396 members 241
(Supplemental Fig. S9). These results demonstrate that OsGRF7 is repressed by 242
OsmiR396. 243
In rice, there are nine miR396s that show various expression profiles (Kozomara 244
and Griffiths-Jones, 2014), implying that each of them may have different functions. 245
To further understand the regulatory activity of OsmiR396 members on OsGRF7, we 246
transiently expressed Ubi:miR396s in GRF7-GFP transgenic rice protoplasts. 247
Immunoblotting assays revealed that at the same OsmiR396 transcript level 248
(Supplemental Fig. S10), the OsGRF7 protein content sharply decreased under the 249
OsmiR396e background (Fig. 2B). Correspondingly, OsmiR396e exhibited the 250
opposite expression pattern of OsGRF7 in different tissues (Fig. 2C), implying that 251
OsmiR396e is mainly responsible for the cleavage of OsGRF7. 252
We further examined the spatial-temporal expression pattern of OsGRF7, and the 253
results showed that OsGRF7 was prominently expressed in the axillary buds, lamina 254
joints, nodes, and internodes as well as highly expressed in young inflorescences and 255
florets (Fig. 2D), corresponding to the RT-qPCR results showing that OsGRF7 was 256
expressed at different levels in various tissues (Fig. 2E). The multi-tissue expression 257
pattern of OsGRF7 was consistent with its pleiotropic roles in controlling plant height, 258
leaf size and angle, and tiller number. 259
Furthermore, transient expression of the GRF7-GFP fusion protein in rice 260
protoplasts showed that OsGRF7 was expressed specifically in the nucleus 261
(Supplemental Fig. S11A), which is consistent with the nuclear localization pattern in 262
GRF7-GFP transgenic lines (Supplemental Fig. S11B), implying that OsGRF7 263
functions in the nucleus. This is in accordance with the transcriptional activity of the 264
OsGRF7 C-terminus (177–430 aa) verified in the yeast expression system 265
(Supplemental Fig. S11C), and the interaction of the OsGRF7 N-terminus with GIFs 266
(Supplemental Fig. S11D, E) such as AtGRF1 and AtGRF2 do in Arabidopsis (Kim 267
and Kende, 2004). These results suggest that OsGRF7 and OsGIFs work together to 268 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
modulate gene expression in the nucleus. 269
270
OsGRF7 directly modulates the expression of multiple GA/IAA-related genes 271
To further elucidate how OsGRF7 influences plant architecture, we performed 272
ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing) 273
against the GFP antibodies using GRF7-GFP transgenic lines. In general, the more 274
active metabolism of young inflorescences than of the leaves or seedlings makes the 275
ChIP assay more practical; thus, young inflorescences of the GRF7-GFP lines were 276
used to identify the potential targets and binding motifs of OsGRF7. By comparing 277
the ChIP-seq data between YP1 (young inflorescences with a length of ~0.5 cm) and 278
YP2 (young inflorescences with a length of ~2 cm) with the input data, we detected 279
1321 and 2290 OsGRF7-bound peaks, respectively (P < 1.0e-5, one-tailed t-test). Of 280
these, approximately 70% and 63% of the peaks lied in the 5ꞌ-upstream regions of 281
genes in YP1 and YP2, respectively (Fig. 3A), implying that OsGRF7 functions 282
mainly in the regulation of gene expression, consistent with its nuclear localization 283
(Supplemental Fig. S11A, B). These peaks were assigned to the closed genes, 284
therefore giving rise to 1096 and 1822 genes (Supplementary Data S1 and 2), 285
respectively, and were found with 563 overlapping genes that accounted for 51.8% in 286
YP1 and 30.9% in YP2 (Fig. 3B). 287
After we performed a Discriminative Regular Expression Motif Elicitation 288
(DREME) (Bailey, 2011) analysis of the filtered ChIP-seq sequences, an 289
OsGRF7-binding motif, ACRGDA (E-value = 2.6e-21), was predicted (Fig. 3C), 290
which was further validated by an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) in 291
vitro (Fig. 3D, E). After analyzing these ChIP-seq identified genes with OsGRF7 292
binding sites individually, we identified 31 functionally known plant 293
architecture-related genes (Supplemental Table S3). These genes could be classified 294
into four categories: plant hormone-related genes, transcription factors, enzymes, and 295
others. Fifteen of them were related to plant hormones, especially OsARF12 and 296
OsCYP714B1, which showed direct regulation by OsGRF7, as verified by ChIP-seq 297
(Fig. 3F). ChIP-qPCR confirmed the in vivo association of OsGRF7 with 298 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
ACRGDA-containing promoter fragments from OsARF12 and OsCYP714B1 (Fig. 299
3G). Similarly, the abundances of mRNAs encoding OsARF12 and OsCYP714B1 300
were relatively enhanced in GRF7OE-1 transgenic lines (Fig. 3H, I). OsGRF7 301
activated the transcription of OsARF12 and OsCYP714B1 by their promoters in 302
transactivation assays (Fig. 3J, K). Finally, EMSA analysis demonstrated the binding 303
of OsGRF7 to ACRGDA-containing promoter fragments from OsARF12 and 304
OsCYP714B1 (Fig. 3L, M). These results demonstrate that these genes are the direct 305
targets of OsGRF7. 306
We further searched the promoter regions of the genes detected by ChIP-seq and 307
found that the promoter regions of IAA-related genes (OsARF3, OsARF4, OsARF8, 308
OsARF9, OsPIN1b, OsPIN1d, and OsPIN8) and GA-related genes (OsSLR1 and 309
OsSLRL1) contained several ACRGDA motifs. RT-qPCR comparisons of WT, 310
GRF7OE-1, GRF7RNAi-1, and GRF7KO-14 indicated that OsGRF7 up-regulated the 311
expression of these IAA/GA-related genes (Fig. 4A). Additionally, ChIP-qPCR also 312
confirmed the activation of OsGRF7 on these genes through the ACRGDA binding 313
site in vivo (Fig. 4B-J), as OsGRF7 greatly enhanced the expression of the luciferase 314
(LUC) reporter gene driven by these promoters (Fig. 4K, L). Taken together, these 315
results support the conclusion that OsGRF7 directly regulates auxin and gibberellin 316
signaling pathway-related genes. 317
318
The oscyp714b1 and osarf12 mutant lines are partial phenotypic copies of 319
OsGRF7 transgenic lines 320
To further validate the functions of OsGRF7 regulated genes in plant architecture 321
determination, we collected two mutants with mutations in OsGRF7 direct target 322
genes, oscyp714b1 and osarf12. Of these, the oscyp714b1 mutant, which has a 323
T-DNA insertion in the promoter region of OsCYP714B1 (Supplemental Fig. S12A), 324
presented increased expression of OsCYP714B1 (Supplemental Fig. S12B). A 325
previous report indicated that OsCYP714B1 participates in GA synthesis and that high 326
expression of OsCYP714B1 represses the plant height by affecting cell elongation 327
(Magome et al., 2013). Here, we analyzed the plant height of oscyp714b1 and found 328 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
that it was reduced by approximately 17.9% relative to that of the WT (Supplemental 329
Fig. S12C, D), consistent with the reduced plant height of the GRF7OE lines (Fig. 330
1A). 331
For the osarf12 mutant, a T-DNA insertion in its third intron prevented its 332
transcription (Supplemental Fig. S12E, F). It exhibited an enlarged leaf angle, with 333
the second leaf angle from the top of the main stalk increasing by approximately 73% 334
compared with that of the WT (Supplemental Fig. S12G, H), which was partially 335
similar to that which occurred for the GRF7RNAi lines. These investigations showed 336
that the phenotype of each mutant was partially a copy of the plant architecture of the 337
OsGRF7 transgenic lines, demonstrating that these genes function downstream of 338
OsGRF7 to jointly control plant architecture in rice. 339
340
OsGRF7 regulates the contents of endogenous GA and IAA 341
We also analyzed the contents of GA and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in 15-d-old 342
seedlings of GRF7OE-1, GRF7RNAi-1, and WT plants. The results showed that the 343
GA1 content was increased in GRF7OE-1 (Fig. 5A). Unfortunately, we did not detect 344
any content of GA4 at this stage (15-d-old seedlings), mainly because the GA1 was 345
predominantly abundant at the vegetative stage, while the level of GA4 was extremely 346
high at the reproductive stage (Kobayashi et al., 1988). In rice, both GA1 and GA4 are 347
bioactive forms derived from GA12, and GA4 is more active than GA1. However, their 348
contents usually exhibit an opposite pattern, and thus, an increase in GA1 leads to a 349
relatively low GA4 content; thus, the dynamic balance between GA1 and GA4 can 350
effectively modulate the plant height (Magome et al., 2013). 351
With respect to auxin, we found that the IAA and methyl indole-3-acetate 352
(ME-IAA) contents of GRF7OE-1 significantly increased (Fig. 5B), which is 353
consistent with the erect leaf angle of those plants (Zhang et al., 2015). 354
Correspondingly, immunohistochemical observations revealed that the adaxial side of 355
the GRF7OE-1 transgenic lines had more auxin than did the GRF7RNAi-1 and 356
GRF7KO-14 lines (Fig. 5C). Auxin is critical in regulating the adaxial/abaxial cell 357
growth of leaves, and the increased auxin content on the adaxial side of the lamina 358 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
joints in the GRF7OE-1 transgenic line promoted cell division, which is consistent 359
with the increased cell layers on the adaxial side of the GRF7OE-1 transgenic line 360
(Fig. 1F, G). These data reveal that OsGRF7 directly regulates the synthesis of 361
endogenous GA and IAA in rice. 362
363
OsGRF7 regulates the sensitivity to exogenous IAA and GA treatment 364
We further treated OsGRF7 transgenic lines and investigated their responses to IAA 365
and GA. After a 5-d treatment with different concentrations of IAA, we found that the 366
primary root length of OsGRF7 transgenic lines decreased significantly under 367
different IAA concentrations, while the primary root length of the GRF7RNAi-1 and 368
WT seedlings decreased more than that of the GRF7OE-1 transgenic lines under 1 μM 369
IAA, meaning that the GRF7OE lines are less sensitive to auxin than the WT (Fig. 5D, 370
E). 371
GA treatment caused GRF7OE-1 seedlings to grow rapidly to the height of the 372
WT and GRF7RNAi-1 plants with increasing GA content, although the second sheath 373
length of GRF7OE-1 was shorter than that of the WT (Fig. 5D, F), meaning that GA 374
could rescue the semi-dwarf phenotype of the GRF7OE plants. This is in agreement 375
with the concept that high expression of OsCYP714B1 will lead to an increase in GA1 376
but a reduction in the content of highly active GA4 (Magome et al., 2013) because 377
OsCYP714B1 encodes GA13 oxidase, which converts GA12 to GA1, in rice. In 378
summary, these results demonstrate that GRF7OE lines are less sensitive to 379
exogenous phytohormone treatments. 380
381
DISCUSSION 382
GRFs, the targets of OsmiR396, are members of a conserved, plant-specific gene 383
family and are involved in many plant developmental processes, such as flowering, 384
leaf morphogenesis, root development and seed formation (Baucher et al., 2013; Liu 385
et al., 2009). Increasing numbers of studies have documented that GRFs positively 386
regulate leaf size by promoting cell proliferation and expansion in plants species such 387
as Arabidopsis and rice (Omidbakhshfard et al., 2015; Rodriguez et al., 2009). In 388 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
Arabidopsis, GRFs mainly participate in leaf and cotyledon growth, and cell division 389
mediated by AtGRFs is important for polarized cell differentiation along the 390
adaxial-abaxial axis during leaf morphogenesis (Wang et al., 2011). Overexpression 391
of AtGRF1 and AtGRF2 resulted in stalks and leaves that were shorter and larger than 392
those of the WT (Kim et al., 2003). In contrast, triple insertional null mutant of 393
AtGRF1-AtGRF3 had smaller leaves and cotyledons (Kim et al., 2003), and quadruple 394
mutant of AtGRF1-AtGRF4 displayed much smaller leaves than its parental mutants 395
(Kim and Lee, 2006), revealing that AtGRFs function mainly in plant height and leaf 396
development. Recently, OsGRF1, OsGRF3, OsGRF4, OsGRF6, and OsGRF10 have 397
been characterized to be involved in the regulation of plant development, especially in 398
grain and floret development (Che et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2015; Kuijt et al., 2014; 399
Luo et al., 2005; Tang et al., 2018), while their roles in plant architecture 400
determination are still poorly understood. The OsmiR396-OsGRF module balanced 401
growth and rice blast disease resistance, and overexpression of OsGRFs, including 402
OsGRF6, OsGRF7, OsGRF8, and OsGRF9, enhanced blast resistance. However, the 403
developmental roles of OsGRF7 have not been investigated in detail (Chandran et al., 404
2018). 405
Here, we found that OsGRF7, in combination with OsGIFs (Supplemental Fig. 406
S11C-E), modulated a wide range of rice plant morphological characteristics, 407
including plant height, leaf length and width, and leaf angle (Fig. 1; Supplemental 408
Table S1). This is in agreement with the results of the amino acid sequence-based 409
phylogenetic analysis showing that OsGRF7 was the closest homolog of AtGRF1 and 410
AtGRF2 (Supplemental Fig. S6). So far, 12 members of the OsGRF gene family have 411
been identified in rice (Choi et al., 2004). Previously OsGRF1, OsGRF4, OsGRF6, 412
and OsGRF10 were found to regulate plant height and leaf size (Che et al., 2015; Hu 413
et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018; Lu et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2018). We found that 414
overexpression of OsGRF7 resulted in decreased plant height (Supplemental Fig. S3D) 415
and altered leaf shape, suggesting that this gene promotes cell division and repress 416
cell elongation in the culm and lamina joint (Fig. 1C-F). Supporting this, plant height 417
increased in GRF7KO lines, however, GRF7RNAi transgenic lines did not simply 418 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
perform opposite to phenotypes of GRF7OE lines. The apparent conflict between 419
GRF7RNAi and GRF7OE lines might be explained by compensatory changes in 420
expression of other GRF genes when OsGRF7 is downregulated, as evidenced by 421
increased transcript levels of OsGRF4, OsGRF6, OsGRF8, and OsGRF9 422
(Supplemental Fig. S7). Alternatively, we cannot rule out the possibility that the 423
GRF7RNAi constructs had off-target effects, and/or that OsGRF7 negatively regulates 424
other GRF genes. 425
Interestingly, unlike AtGRFs in Arabidopsis, OsGRF7 was expressed mainly 426
around the vascular bundle of leaves and culms (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Fig. S8), 427
which promoted cell expansion and cell proliferation of parenchymal cells through 428
periclinal division, especially on the adaxial side of the lamina joints, leading to 429
reduced leaf angle and culm length in GRF7OE-1 transgenic lines, implying that 430
OsGRF7 plays a vital role in plant architecture establishment. These findings reflect 431
the functional diversification of structural orthologous genes in phylogenetically 432
distant species. 433
Plant hormones regulate many physiological processes that mainly influence 434
growth, differentiation, and development (Luo et al., 2016). Recently, miRNAs have 435
been found to modulate not only a wide range of agronomic characteristics but also 436
many phytohormone-related biological processes (Djami-Tchatchou et al., 2017; Tang 437
and Chu, 2017). These miRNAs function through their targets to modulate 438
downstream genes involved in plant hormone perception and signaling, receptor 439
proteins or even enzyme synthesis (Tang and Chu, 2017). Here, we found that 440
OsGRF7 can directly regulate a series of GA/IAA-related genes (Figs. 3 and 4), and 441
can fine tune the hormone balance of GAs and IAAs (Fig. 5A-C). Hence, they 442
coordinately regulate the development of internodes, leaves, and lamina joints, and 443
ultimately shape rice plant architecture (Fig. 6). A reduced auxin level causes an 444
enhanced leaf angle due to the stimulation of cell elongation and repression of the 445
division of parenchymal cells on the adaxial side, suggesting a negative effect of 446
auxin on leaf inclination (Zhao et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2017). Indeed, a high auxin 447
level is detected at the lamina joint of GRF7OE-1 transgenic lines (Fig. 5B, C), which 448 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
is consistent with the increased expression of OsGRF7 in the lamina joints (Fig. 2D, 449
E). Combined with the cytological observations, our results showed that auxin is 450
synthesized and undergoes polar transport, resulting in a high local auxin 451
concentration on the adaxial side of the lamina joint, stimulating cell division but 452
repressing cell elongation in GRF7OE-1 transgenic lines (Fig. 5C). These findings 453
greatly expand our understanding of the involvement of the miR396-GRF module in 454
hormone balance, signaling, and plant architecture determination. 455
As such, short plant stature has been the main target for the improvement of 456
lodging resistance in rice breeding because it affords a lower risk to lodging (Ookawa 457
et al., 2010). Here, GRF7OE lines exhibited decreased plant height and sturdy stalks 458
resulting from decreased culm length (Supplemental Fig. S2) and increased culm wall 459
thickness (Fig. 1C and E). The size of the vascular bundles was significantly and 460
negatively correlated with the lodging index, and increasing the size of vascular 461
bundles can improve the lodging resistance in rice (Zhang et al., 2016). Cytological 462
observations revealed that the GRF7OE lines had relatively large vascular bundles in 463
the culms and leaves, and the parenchymal cells in the GRF7RNAi and GRF7KO 464
leaves degraded faster than did those in the WT and GRF7OE lines as the leaves 465
matured (Supplemental Fig. S8), meaning that the leaves and culms of the GRF7RNAi 466
and GRF7KO lines senesced earlier, and the parenchymal tissues became thinner as 467
the plant matured. Consistent with this idea, auxin was concentrated mainly at the 468
lamina joint and vascular bundles, and an apparent local auxin gradient from the 469
cortical tissue inward was observed (Fig. 5C), reflecting that auxin modulates the leaf 470
and culm development and senescence. An optimum level of auxin is required for cell 471
division, differentiation and elongation; vascular development; and organ patterning 472
(Woodward and Bartel, 2005). Auxin can also promote the vascular bundle 473
development to regulate leaf angle (Zhang et al., 2015). These cytological 474
characteristics in the GRF7RNAi and GRF7KO lines will cause the leaves to drop and 475
the plants to lodge when encountering catastrophic weather with strong wind and 476
heavy rain. In contrast, the high auxin content in the GRF7OE-1 transgenic lines 477
increased the vascular bundle size both in the lamina joints and in the internodes (Fig. 478 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
1C, F and Supplemental Fig. S8), resulting in erect leaf angles and sturdy stalks, 479
which can be used in modern breeding for enhancing rice lodging resistance. 480
The leaf angle of rice is an important agronomic trait that constitutes the 481
foundation of plant architecture. Increased leaf angles can expose leaf blades to more 482
light but decreased light capture for the canopy, which is adverse for dense planting. 483
In contrast, erect plant architecture is favored by crop breeders because it improves 484
photosynthetic efficiency and increases plant density, thus improving the 485
accumulation of leaf nitrogen for grain filling and increasing grain yield (Wang et al., 486
2018). The selection of novel genes controlling leaf angle and plant height is vital to 487
further improve rice plant architecture. Our characterization of the OsGRF7 gene 488
provides knowledge of the molecular basis of plant architecture control, and 489
utilization of OsGRF7 could be a favorable option for improving plant architecture 490
and increasing lodging resistance. 491
492
Methods and materials 493
Plant materials and growth conditions 494
Rice Yuetai B (YB) (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica) was used as the transgenic receptor 495
in this study. The osarf12 and oscyp714b1 mutants (under Dongjin, a Japonica 496
accession) were obtained from the Rice Functional Genomics Express Database of 497
Korea (Jeong et al., 2002). MIM396-3 is the same as that in our previous study (Gao 498
et al., 2015). GRF7OE-1, GRF7OE-2, GRF7RNAi-1, and GRF7RNAi-2 transgenic 499
lines are the same as those in our previous study (Chandran et al., 2018). The T4 500
generation of the OsGRF7 overexpression and RNAi transgenic lines were used for 501
the experiments. All the rice plants used in this study were grown in either Wuhan 502
(May to October), or Hainan (December to April), China during 2013-2018. To 503
investigate the agronomic traits, ten plants were planted in each row, and the middle 504
five plants of each row were harvested to measure the agronomic traits. The 505
plant-to-plant spacing was 16.5 cm within each row and the row-to-row spacing was 506
26.7 cm. Field management practices essentially followed normal agricultural 507
practices. 508 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
509
Phenotype measurement 510
The plant height, effective panicle number, flag leaf length and width, and leaf angle 511
were measured at the maturity stage (more than 95% of grains were matured). The 512
plant height was measured from the lowest node to the flag leaf of the main tiller, and 513
the effective panicle number was counted with the panicle bearing more than 10 fully 514
developed seeds. The flag leaf of the main tiller was used to measure the flag leaf 515
length and width, and the leaf sheath was imaged and measured with Image J 516
software. 517
518
Vector construction and plant transformation 519
The 1.3 kb full-length cDNA of OsGRF7 was amplified from the young inflorescence 520
of YB and recombined into the overexpression vector pH7WG2D (Invitrogen) derived 521
by CAMV 35S promoter. To generate GRF7RNAi transgenic plants, 316 bp cDNA 522
(661 bp to 977 bp) was inserted into a pANIC8A (Arabidopsis Biological Resource 523
Center) vector. For the construction of GRF7-GFP, full-length cDNA of OsGRF7 was 524
recombined into the plant expression vector pGWB5 (Invitrogen). A ~2 kb promoter 525
fragment of OsGRF7 was cloned into the pGWB3 vector (Invitrogen) to create the 526
GRF7pro:GUS reporter gene construct. These vectors were introduced into the 527
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 and transformed into YB. Primers used in 528
this study were listed in Supplemental Data S3. 529
530
Generation of the OsGRF7 knock-out mutant using the CRISPR/Cas9 system 531
The CRISPR/Cas9 knockout plasmid for OsGRF7 was constructed as previously 532
reported (Ma et al., 2015). We generated two sgRNA constructs (designed in the 533
second exon, Supplemental Fig. S5A), in which the sgRNA was driven by the rice U6 534
promoter, and the plant-optimized Cas9 was driven by the Ubi promoter. The 535
integrated sgRNA expression cassettes were amplified and cloned into the 536
CRISPR/Cas9 vector pYLCRISPR/Cas9Pubi-H (Ma et al., 2015). The construct was 537
introduced into the wild-type variety YB. Then the 74 independent transgenic lines 538 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
were subjected to PCR amplification and sequencing analysis. The T2 generation of 539
GRF7KO lines were used for the experiments. The genotype of GRF7KO lines was 540
listed in Supplemental Table S2. 541
542
Histological analysis 543
Plant tissues were fixed in FAA solution (3.7% (v/v) formaldehyde, 50% (v/v) ethanol, 544
and 5% (v/v) acetic acid) and embedded in paraplast plus (Sigma-Aldrich). 8 μm thick 545
sections were stained with toluidine blue for light microscopic analysis. Five 546
independent sections were microscopically examined and photographed to measure 547
the cell layers, culm thickness, and cell length; ten independent sections were 548
microscopically examined and photographed to measure the area of the large vascular 549
bundles (Leica). 550
551
5ꞌ RACE analysis 552
Total RNA from YB young inflorescence was isolated with TRIzol reagent 553
(Invitrogen), then ligated to RNA adaptors and synthesized into cDNA using 554
Superscript III according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). 5ꞌ RACE 555
was performed with the GeneRace kit (Invitrogen). 556
557
Transient expression, protein extraction, and immunoblotting 558
CDS of OsrGRF7 was synthesized and ligated downstream of the 35S promoter. For 559
OsmiR396/Os(r)GRF7 coexpression experiments, an equal amount of plasmids (3 μg) 560
containing Ubi:miR396s and 35S:(r)GRF7 were mixed before transformed into rice 561
protoplasts. After transformation, protoplasts were placed at 28 °C for 24 h before 562
RNA extraction. The OsmiR396 precursors were ligated downstream of the ubiquitin 563
promoter with restriction site BamHI in the pCAMBIA1301 vector. Protoplasts 564
isolated from etiolated rice seedlings of GRF7-GFP transgenic lines were transfected 565
with 3 μg Ubi:miR396s, or empty vector plasmids by the 40% (w/v) 566
polyethyleneglycol (PEG), respectively. After incubation for 16 h, the OsGRF7 567 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
protein was detected by western blot analysis using an anti-GFP antibody. Total RNA 568
was extracted to detect the transcript levels of OsmiR396s. 569
570
Total RNA isolation and RT-qPCR 571
Total RNA (2 μg) was extracted and synthesized into cDNA using the Moloney 572
murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the user’s 573
manual. RT-qPCR was performed by Light Cycler 480 II (Roche, Germany) with 574
SYBR Green PCR Mixture (Roche, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s 575
instruction. The OsUBI gene was used as the internal control. Three technical 576
replicates were performed to generate the average value and three biological repeats 577
were performed for each analysis. 578
579
Histochemical GUS staining 580
Different tissues were stained with GUS staining buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate, 581
10 mM EDTA, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, and 1 mM X-Gluc 582
(5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-glucuronic acid) (Sigma), pH = 7.0) overnight at 583
37 °C. All samples were observed with an SLR camera (Nikon SMZ-645). Two 584
independent lines were analyzed for GUS staining. 585
586
Subcellular localization and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) 587
For subcellular localization, the full-length of OsGRF7 cDNA was cloned into 588
pGWB5 (Invitrogen). For BiFC, the full-length of OsGRF7 cDNA was amplified with 589
restriction sites XbalI and ClaI and cloned into the pSPYNE (N-terminal of YFP), and 590
the full-length of OsGRF7, OsGIF1, OsGIF2, and OsGIF3 cDNA were amplified 591
with restriction sites XbalI and ClaI and inserted into the pSPYCE (C-terminal of YFP) 592
(Walter et al., 2004). Rice protoplasts were isolated as described previously (Yoo et al., 593
2007), with some modifications. After overnight incubation in the darkness, the 594
fluorescent signals and bright-field images of the protoplasts were taken by an 595
FV1000 confocal system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Empty vectors of BiFC constructs 596
were used as a negative control. 597 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
598
Transactivation activation assay 599
To test the transactivation activity, the full-length or the truncated OsGRF7 with 600
restriction sites BamHI and EcoRI were amplified and cloned into pGBKT7 601
(Clontech). The plasmids were transformed into yeast strain AH109, then 602
transformants were plated on either SD/-Trp or SD/-Trp-His-Leu-Ade medium. 603
604
Yeast two-hybrid assay 605
The full-length cDNA of OsGIF1, OsGIF2, OsGIF3, and OsGRF7 with restriction 606
sites EcoRI and BamHI were cloned into the prey vector pGADT7 (Clontech), and the 607
full-length or truncated cDNA of OsGRF7 with restriction sites BamHI and EcoRI 608
was cloned into the pGBKT7 (Clontech). The prey and bait plasmids were 609
co-transformed into AH109 and plated on SD/-Leu-Trp media for 3 days at 30 °C. 610
Interactions between bait and prey were further tested on SD/-Trp-His-Leu-Ade 611
medium. 612
613
ChIP-seq and bioinformatics analysis 614
The transgenic lines GRF7-GFP were used for ChIP assays according to the method 615
(Feng et al., 2012) with some modifications. Briefly, 5 g < 0.5 cm (YP1) or < 2 cm 616
(YP2) inflorescences were harvested and crosslinked with 1% (v/v) formaldehyde 617
under vacuum for 30 min, then ground into powder in liquid nitrogen. The chromatin 618
complexes were isolated, sonicated, and incubated with the anti-GFP antibodies 619
(Abcam, ab290). The precipitated DNA was recovered and dissolved in 1×TE for later 620
in-depth analysis. 621
Illumina sequencing libraries were constructed with the above-prepared DNA 622
samples by ThruPLEX DNA-seq Kit mainly according to the manufacturer’s 623
instructions. Then, the library containing 270 bp to 330 bp fragments were purified 624
and sequenced with Illumina Hiseq3000 system. Clean reads were mapped to the rice 625
genome using Bowtie (Langmead et al., 2009). MACS (Liu, 2014) was used with a 626
p-value cutoff of 10−5
for binding peaking. The reads per million (RPM) around the 627 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
peak summit (± 5 kb) was documented with a 100-nt window size to calculate the 628
average enrichment level of the peak. To predict binding motifs, the flanking 629
sequences of all peak summits (± 50 bp) were filtered by RepeatMasker Web Server 630
(http://www.repeatmasker.org) and the masked sequences were subjected to 631
Discriminative Regular Expression Motif Elicitation (DREME) (Bailey, 2011). 632
633
ChIP-qPCR 634
The prepared DNA in ChIP was quantified using quantitative PCR with their primers. 635
PCR reactions were performed in triplicate for each sample, and the values were 636
normalized to the input sample to obtain the enrichment fold. The fold enrichment 637
was calculated against the OsUBI promoter. No addition of antibodies (NoAbs) was 638
served as a negative control. Three biological replicates were performed for each 639
analysis. 640
641
Transient transactivation assay 642
Approximately 2-kb promoter regions from each of OsARF3, OsARF8, OsPIN1b, 643
OsPIN1d, OsPIN8, and OsSLR1 with restriction sites XhoI and BamHI; OsARF9 and 644
OsSLRL1 with restriction sites XhoI and BglII; OsARF4, OsARF12, and 645
OsCYP714B1 with restriction sites HindIII and BamHI were amplified from YB, and 646
then cloned into a pGreenII-0800-Luc (EK-Bioscience) vector containing the renilla 647
luciferase reporter gene driven by the 35S promoter and the firefly luciferase reporter 648
gene, thus generating the vectors containing specific promoters fused to firefly 649
luciferase. Transient transactivation assays were performed using rice protoplasts, and 650
the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) was used to detect the 651
luciferase activity, with the renilla luciferase gene as the internal control. Three 652
biological replicates were performed for each analysis. 653
654
Expression and purification of His-GRF7 fusion proteins in Escherichia coli 655
The full-length cDNA fragment was amplified with restriction sites BamHI and 656
EcoRI and fused into expression vector pCOLD. To extract recombinant protein, 657 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
Rosetta (DE3) cells carrying pCOLD-GRF7 plasmid were inoculated at 37 °C to an 658
optical density. Then IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactoside) was added to a final 659
concentration of 0.2 mM, and cultures were grown for 24 h at 15 °C. Cultured cells 660
were harvested, lysed, and centrifuged, then the supernatant was purified by 661
His-Binding-resin (GE Healthcare) using AKTA Prime Plus protein purification 662
system (GE Healthcare). 663
664
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) 665
Oligonucleotides were synthesized and labeled by digoxin. Promoter regions were 666
amplified, labeled by digoxin and purified as the probe, respectively. Then, 200 ng 667
DNA probe, 2 μg of protein (His-GRF7) and 2 μl of 10×binding buffer (100 mM Tris, 668
500 mM KCl, and 10 mM dithiothreitol, pH = 7.5), 1 μl of 50% (v/v) glycerol, 1 μl of 669
1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 1 μl of 1 M KCl, 1 μl of 0.5 M EDTA, 1 μl of 1 mg ml-1
poly 670
(dI-dC), and double-distilled water were mixed to a final volume of 20 μl (Liu et al., 671
2014), and reacted for 20 min at 25 °C. Further, electrophoresed on 3.5% (w/v) native 672
polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to N+ nylon membranes (Millipore) in TBE 673
buffer (44.5 mM Tris-borate, 1 mM EDTA) at 200 mA at 4 °C for 1 h. 674
Digoxin-labeled DNA was detected by the CDP-star easy to use kit (Roche). 675
676
Measuring endogenous phytohormones 677
Contents of IAA and GA were analyzed using an LC-ESI-MS/MS system. To detect 678
endogenous GA and IAA, 15 seeds of the OsGRF7 transgenic lines were planted in a 679
container filled with soil with 2 × 2 cm spacing in a phytotron. Fresh 15-d-old 680
seedlings were harvested, weighed and then immediately ground into powder in liquid 681
nitrogen. Since tissue close to the soil may be contaminated, approximately 0.5 cm of 682
tissue near soil was removed with scissors. After being extracted with 1 ml of 80% 683
(v/v) methanol at 4 °C for 12 h, the extract was centrifuged at 12,000 g under 4 °C for 684
15 min. The supernatant was collected and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen gas 685
stream, then reconstituted in 100 ml 95% (v/v) acetonitrile. The supernatant was 686
collected for LC-MS analysis after the solution was centrifuged. Each series of 687 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
experiments was performed in biological triplicates. 688
689
Immunohistochemical observation (IHC) of IAA 690
To cross-link IAA, excised lamina joints were prefixed for 2 h in 3% (w/v) EDAC 691
(Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature and then transferred to FAA at 4 °C for 24 h. 8 692
μm thick sections were deparaffinized and hydrated. Antigen retrieval was carried out 693
by rinsing the slides in 0.1 M sodium citrate buffer and microwave-heated at high 694
power for 5 min. After being washed three times with 10 mM PBS buffer for 10 min, 695
the slides were subsequently incubated in 10 mM PBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 696
20, 1.5% (v/v) glycine, and 5% (w/v) BSA for 45 min at 22 °C. Samples were then 697
rinsed in a regular salt rinse solution [RSRS; 10 mM PBS, 0.88% (w/v) NaCl, 0.1% 698
(v/v) Tween 20 and 0.8% (w/v) BSA] and washed briefly with 10 mM PBS 699
containing 0.8% (w/v) BSA (PBS+BSA) solution. After the application of anti-IAA 700
antibodies to each slide, samples were incubated overnight in a humidity chamber at 701
4 °C. After hybridization, samples were subjected to a series of vigorous washes, 702
twice with a high-salt rinse solution [HSRS; 10 mM PBS, 2.9% (w/v) NaCl, 0.1% 703
(v/v) Tween 20 and 0.1% (w/v) BSA] for 15 min, once with RSRS for 15 min, and 704
briefly with PBS+BSA. The Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies 705
were then placed on each slide, and these were incubated for 4–6 h in a humidity 706
chamber at room temperature. After washing with RSRS twice for 15 min, samples 707
were mounted with an anti-fade reagent, covered with a coverslip, and observed under 708
a fluorescent microscope (Sakata et al., 2010). 709
710
Plant hormone treatment 711
For hormone treatment, de-hulled seeds were sowed on the 1/2 MS agar medium 712
containing different phytohormones. After a 5-d growth, the length of the root and the 713
second sheath were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH). Three biological 714
replicates were performed and five plants for each replicate were collected for data 715
analysis. 716
717 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
Phylogenetic analysis 718
For phylogenetic analysis of OsGRF7 homologs in Oryza sativa and Arabidopsis, a 719
total of 12 rice GRF protein sequence and 9 Arabidopsis GRF protein sequence were 720
obtained in PLAZA 2.5 (Van Bel et al., 2012). The amino acid sequences were aligned 721
using the CLUSTAL X program. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 722
X (Kumar et al., 2018) based on the Maximum Likelihood method with 1,000 723
bootstrap replicates. 724
725
Statistical analysis 726
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics, version 20.0 (IBM, 727
Armonk, NY, USA). The two-tailed t-test was used for comparing the agronomic 728
traits of each transgenic line with the WT. The correlation analysis was performed 729
with GraphPad Prism 8 to generate the r and P values. 730
731
Accession numbers 732
Sequence from this article can be found in the GeneBank / EMBL databases under the 733
following accession numbers: OsGRF7, Os12g0484900; OsGIF1, Os03g0733600; 734
OsGIF2, Os11g0615200; OsGIF3, Os12g0496900; OsCYP714B1, Os07g0681300; 735
OsARF12, Os04g0671900; OsUBI, Os03g0234200. High-throughput sequencing data 736
created in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database 737
(GSE109802). 738
739
Supplemental Data 740
Supplemental Figure S1. Phenotypic and molecular analysis of miR396 mimicry 741
(MIM396) transgenic lines. 742
Supplemental Figure S2. Comparison of internode length between WT and OsGRF7 743
transgenic lines. 744
Supplemental Figure S3. The relationship between OsGRF7 expression levels and 745
phenotypic traits of the OsGRF7 transgenic lines. 746
Supplemental Figure S4. Genetic analysis between OsmiR396 and OsGRF7. 747 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
Supplemental Figure S5. Phenotype and molecular characterization of OsGRF7 748
knock-out lines. 749
Supplemental Figure S6. Phylogenetic analysis of GRFs in Arabidopsis and rice. 750
Supplemental Figure S7. Expression analysis of OsGRF members in the OsGRF7 751
transgenic lines. 752
Supplemental Figure S8. Cytological dynamics of lamina joint from the initiation to 753
maturation. 754
Supplemental Figure S9. Regulation of OsGRF7 by OsmiR396s. 755
Supplemental Figure S10. The transcription levels of the OsmiR396 family in 756
GRF7-GFP transgenic rice protoplasts were analyzed with RT-PCR. 757
Supplemental Figure S11. Analysis of interactions between OsGRF7 and OsGIFs. 758
Supplemental Figure S12. Architecture and molecular identification of oscyp714b1 759
and osarf12 mutants. 760
Supplemental Table S1. Agronomic traits of OsGRF7 transgenic lines 761
Supplemental Table S2. Genotype analysis of GRF7KO transgenic lines 762
Supplemental Table S3. Functional categories of genes associated with OsGRF7 763
binding sites 764
Supplemental Dataset S1. Genes associated with OsGRF7 binding sites identified by 765
ChIP-seq in YP1 (< 0.5 cm). 766
Supplemental Dataset S2. Genes associated with OsGRF7 binding sites identified by 767
ChIP-seq in YP2 (< 2 cm). 768
Supplemental Dataset S3. Primers used in this paper. 769
770
Acknowledgements 771
We thank Dr. Kun Wang and Zhenying Shi for their critical reading and advice during 772
the preparation of this paper. We also thank Dr. Ai Qin for providing assistance in the 773
bioinformatic analysis. 774
775
Figure legends 776 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization. A, Gross morphology of WT, OsGRF7 777
overexpression (GRF7OE-1) and OsGRF7 RNAi (GRF7RNAi-1) plants. Scale bars, 778
15 cm. B, Comparison of the flag leaf angles (up-panel) and the top second leaf angles 779
(down-panel) between OsGRF7 transgenic lines. Scale bars, 1 cm. C, Transverse 780
(up-panel) and longitudinal (down-panel) section of internodes in WT, GRF7OE-1, 781
and GRF7RNAi-1 plants. Scale bars, 200 μm. D, Cell length of the internode. E, Culm 782
wall thickness of OsGRF7 transgenic lines. F, Transverse (up-panel) and longitudinal 783
(down-panel) section of the lamina joint of flag leaves. Scale bars, 200 μm. Red boxes 784
areas in up-panel are enlarged. Red arrows mean adaxial side cell layers measured in 785
the panel G. pc, parenchymal cell; vb, vascular bundle; ad, adaxial surface of the 786
lamina joint. G, Adaxial side cell layers of the transverse sections of lamina joints. 787
Panels D, E, and G: Values are means ± SD of five biological replicates. *** P < 788
0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t-test). 789
790
Figure 2. OsGRF7 is mainly repressed by OsmiR396e and expresses in various 791
tissues. A, The OsGRF7 cleavage site sequence complementary to OsmiR396. The 792
position corresponding to the 5′ ends of the cleaved OsGRF7 mRNA determined by 5′ 793
RACE and the frequency of 5′ RACE clones corresponding to the cleavage site is 794
shown by the arrow. 8/12 means eight of twelve clones have OsmiR396 cleavage site. 795
The mutated sites in OsrGRF7 were marked in red. The asterisks indicate 796
mis-matched sites between OsmiR396 and OsGRF7. The gray box indicates the QLQ 797
domain, the pink box indicates the WRC domain, and the purple box indicates the C 798
terminal of OsGRF7, respectively. B, Protein immunoblotting of OsGRF7 799
coexpressed with OsmiR396s in GRF7-GFP transgenic rice protoplasts. Vector and 800
control mean with or without the empty vector, respectively. Coomassie brilliant blue 801
(CBB) staining was used as loading controls. The relative protein amounts were 802
determined by ImageJ (NIH). C, Relative expression levels of OsGRF7 and 803
OsmiR396s were detected by RT-qPCR in internode, root, inflorescence (10 cm), 804
node, flag leaf, SAM (shoot apical meristem), axillary bud, and lamina joint, 805
respectively. D, GRF7pro:GUS expression patterns in transgenic plants. (1) Small 806 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
panicle branch. (2-4) Inflorescence at different stages. (5-6) Spikelet. (7) Root tip. (8) 807
Flag leaf. (9) Node. (10) Internode. (11) Axillary bud. (12) Lamina joint of the 30-d 808
seedling. Scale bars, 2 mm. E, Relative expression levels of OsGRF7 in different 809
tissues analyzed with RT-qPCR. OsUBI was used as an internal reference. Values are 810
means ± SD of three biological replicates. 811
812
Figure 3. ChIP analysis of the OsGRF7 target genes. A, Distribution of OsGRF7 813
binding peaks in the rice genome. B, Genes reproducibly associated with OsGRF7 814
binding sites in YP1 (young inflorescences with a length of ~0.5 cm) or YP2 (young 815
inflorescences with a length of ~2 cm). C, Putative OsGRF7-binding motif predicted 816
by DREME. D, Expression and purification of OsGRF7 protein in E. coli. The red 817
arrowhead indicates the purified OsGRF7 protein. E, EMSA validation of interaction 818
between OsGRF7 and motif ACRGDA (ACAGTA). TAAGTA was used as the control. 819
F, OsGRF7 binding peaks in the promoters of OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12. Blue 820
boxes indicate probe locations. Bar = 1 kb. G, ChIP-qPCR validation of OsGRF7 821
binding sites in the promoters of OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12. The fold enrichment 822
was normalized against the promoter of OsUBI. No addition of antibodies (NoAbs) 823
served as a negative control. H and I, Relative expression levels of the OsCYP714B1 824
and OsARF12 in the lamina joint of OsGRF7 transgenic lines were detected with 825
RT-qPCR. OsUBI was used as an internal reference. J and K, OsGRF7 actives 826
OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12 promoter-luciferase fusion constructs in transient 827
transactivation assays. L and M, EMSA validation of bindings between OsGRF7 and 828
promoters of OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12, respectively. The 2-, 10- and 100- fold 829
unmodified probes were used as competitors. The presence (+) or absence (-) of 830
components in the reaction mixture was indicated. Red triangles indicate the site of 831
ACRGDA motifs on promoter region. Panels G-K: Values are means ± SD of three 832
biological replicates. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s 833
t-test). 834
835
Figure 4. OsGRF7 regulates expression of multiple IAA/GA-related genes. A, 836 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
Relative expression levels of auxin signaling related and GA synthesis related genes 837
in the lamina joint of the OsGRF7 transgenic lines. OsUBI was used as an internal 838
reference. B to J, GRF7-GFP mediated ChIP-qPCR enrichment (relative to the 839
promoter region of OsUBI) of ACRGDA-containing fragments (marked with 840
arrowhead) from promoters of auxin signaling related genes (ARF3, ARF4, ARF8, 841
ARF9, PIN1b, PIN1d, and PIN8) and GA synthesis related genes (SLR1 and SLRL1). 842
The promoter region of OsUBI was used as a control. K and L, OsGRF7 actives ARF3, 843
ARF4, ARF8, ARF9, PIN1b, PIN1d, PIN8, SLR1, and SLRL1 promoter-luciferase 844
fusion constructs in transient transactivation assays. Panels B-J, L: Values are means 845
± SD of three biological replicates. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 (two-tailed 846
Student’s t-test). 847
848
Figure 5. Endogenous phytohormone contents and exogenous phytohormone 849
sensitivity test of OsGRF7 transgenic lines. A and B, Quantification of GA (A) and 850
IAA (B) derivatives in OsGRF7 transgenic seedlings detected with LC-MS/MS. 851
Values are means ± SD of three biological replicates. * P < 0.05 (two-tailed Student’s 852
t-test). Abbreviations: ME-IAA, methyl indole-3-acetate; ICA, 853
indole-3-carboxaldehyde; IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; NAA, 1-naphthylacetic acid. 854
F.W., fresh weight. nd indicate not detected (below the detection limit). C, 855
Immunohistochemical observation (IHC) of indole-3-acetic acid at the lamina joint of 856
OsGRF7 transgenic lines. Anti-IAA antibody and Alexa 488-conjugated goat 857
anti-rabbit IgG antibody were used. Scale bars, 100 μm. D, Phenotypes of OsGRF7 858
transgenic seedlings treated by different concentrations of phytohormones. The same 859
control has been used for 0 μM IAA and GA. Scale bars, 2 cm. E, Effects of different 860
concentrations of IAA on primary root length in WT, GRF7OE-1, and GRF7RNAi-1. 861
Values are means ± SD (n = 15, three biological replicates and five plants per 862
replicate). F, Effects of different concentrations of GA3 on the second sheath length in 863
WT, GRF7OE-1, and GRF7RNAi-1 seedlings. Values are means ± SD (n = 15, three 864
biological replicates and five plants per replicate). Different letters denote significant 865
differences (P < 0.05) from Duncan’s multiple range tests. 866 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
867
Figure 6. A proposed model for the regulation of rice plant architecture by OsGRF7. 868
In GRF7OE plants, OsGRF7 co-activates with OsGIFs to up-regulate the expressions 869
of downstream hormone-related genes through binding to ACRGDA motifs. Then the 870
synthesis of GA4 is inhibited, and the synthesis of IAA is promoted. Finally, the 871
GRF7OE plants display a semi-dwarf and compact plant architecture. Abbreviations: 872
IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; GA, gibberellin. 873
874
References 875
Bailey T L. (2011). DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics 876
27:1653-1659. 877
Baucher M, Moussawi J, Vandeputte O M, Monteyne D, Mol A, Perez-Morga D, and El Jaziri M. 878
(2013). A role for the miR396/GRF network in specification of organ type during flower 879
development, as supported by ectopic expression of Populus trichocarpa miR396c in transgenic 880
tobacco. Plant Biol. 15:892-898. 881
Chandran V, Wang H, Gao F, Cao X L, Chen Y P, Li G B, Zhu Y, Yang X M, Zhang L L, Zhao Z 882
X, et al. (2018). miR396-OsGRFs module balances growth and rice blast disease-resistance. Front. 883
Plant Sci. 9:1999. 884
Che R, Tong H, Shi B, Liu Y, Fang S, Liu D, Xiao Y, Hu B, Liu L, Wang H, et al. (2015). Control 885
of grain size and rice yield by GL2-mediated brassinosteroid responses. Nat. Plants 2:15195. 886
Chen X, Lu S, Wang Y, Zhang X, Lv B, Luo L, Xi D, Shen J, Ma H, and Ming F. (2015). OsNAC2 887
encoding a NAC transcription factor that affects plant height through mediating the gibberellic acid 888
pathway in rice. Plant J. 82:302-314. 889
Choi D, Kim J H, and Kende H. (2004). Whole genome analysis of the OsGRF gene family encoding 890
plant-specific putative transcription activators in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Cell Physiology 891
45:897-904. 892
Djami-Tchatchou A T, Sanan-Mishra N, Ntushelo K, and Dubery I A. (2017). Functional roles of 893
microRNAs in agronomically important plants-potential as targets for crop improvement and 894
protection. Front. Plant Sci. 8:378. 895 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
Ercoli M F, Ferela A, Debernardi J M, Perrone A P, Rodriguez R E, and Palatnik J F. (2018). GIF 896
transcriptional co-regulators control root meristem homeostasis. Plant Cell 30:347-359. 897
Feng J, Liu T, Qin B, Zhang Y, and Liu X S. (2012). Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. 898
Nat. Protoc. 7:1728-1740. 899
Gao F, Wang K, Liu Y, Chen Y, Chen P, Shi Z, Luo J, Jiang D, Fan F, Zhu Y, et al. (2015). 900
Blocking miR396 increases rice yield by shaping inflorescence architecture. Nat. Plants 2:15196. 901
Gao S, Fang J, Xu F, Wang W, and Chu C. (2016). Rice HOX12 regulates panicle exsertion by 902
directly modulating the expression of ELONGATED UPPERMOST INTERNODE1. Plant Cell 903
28:680-695. 904
Hu J, Wang Y, Fang Y, Zeng L, Xu J, Yu H, Shi Z, Pan J, Zhang D, Kang S, et al. (2015). A rare 905
allele of GS2 enhances grain size and grain yield in rice. Mol. Plant 8:1455-1465. 906
Jeong D H, An S, Kang H G, Moon S, Han J J, Park S, Lee H S, An K, and An G. (2002). T-DNA 907
insertional mutagenesis for activation tagging in rice. Plant Physiol. 130:1636-1644. 908
Khush G S. (1995). Breaking the yield frontier of rice. GeoJournal 35:329–332. 909
Kim J H, Choi D, and Kende H. (2003). The AtGRF family of putative transcriptioon factors is 910
involved in leaf and cotyledon growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 36:94-104. 911
Kim J H, and Kende H. (2004). A transcriptional coactivator, AtGIF1, is involved in regulating leaf 912
growth and morphology in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:13374-13379. 913
Kim J H, and Lee B H. (2006). GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR4 of Arabidopsis thaliana is 914
required for development of leaves, cotyledons, and shoot apical meristem. J. Plant Biol. 915
49:463-468. 916
Kobayashi M, Yamaguchi I, Murofushi N, Ota Y, and Takahashi N. (1988). Fluctuation and 917
localization of endogenous gibberellins in rice. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 918
52:1189-1194. 919
Kozomara A, and Griffiths-Jones S. (2014). miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using 920
deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42:D68-73. 921
Kuijt S J, Greco R, Agalou A, Shao J, t Hoen C C, Overnas E, Osnato M, Curiale S, Meynard D, 922
van Gulik R, et al. (2014). Interaction between the GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR and 923
KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX families of transcription factors. Plant Physiol. 164:1952-1966. 924
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, and Tamura K. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary 925 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547-1549. 926
Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, and Salzberg S L. (2009). Ultrafast and memory-efficient 927
alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10:R25. 928
Lavy M, and Estelle M. (2016). Mechanisms of auxin signaling. Development 143:3226-3229. 929
Li S, Gao F, Xie K, Zeng X, Cao Y, Zeng J, He Z, Ren Y, Li W, Deng Q, et al. (2016). The 930
OsmiR396c-OsGRF4-OsGIF1 regulatory module determines grain size and yield in rice. Plant 931
Biotechnol. J. 14:2134-2146. 932
Li S, Tian Y, Wu K, Ye Y, Yu J, Zhang J, Liu Q, Hu M, Li H, Tong Y, et al. (2018). Modulating 933
plant growth-metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture. Nature 560:595-600. 934
Li Y, Li J, Chen Z, Wei Y, Qi Y, and Wu C. (2020). OsmiR167a-targeted auxin response factors 935
modulate tiller angle via fine-tuning auxin distribution in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 936
10.1111/pbi.13360. 937
Liu D, Song Y, Chen Z, and Yu D. (2009). Ectopic expression of miR396 suppresses GRF target gene 938
expression and alters leaf growth in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 136:223-236. 939
Liu H, Guo S, Xu Y, Li C, Zhang Z, Zhang D, Xu S, Zhang C, and Chong K. (2014). 940
OsmiR396d-regulated OsGRFs function in floral organogenesis in rice through binding to their 941
targets OsJMJ706 and OsCR4. Plant Physiol. 165:160-174. 942
Liu T. (2014). Use Model-Based Analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS) to analyze short reads generated by 943
sequencing protein-DNA interactions in embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1150:81-95. 944
Lu Y, Meng Y, Zeng J, Luo Y, Feng Z, Bian L, and Gao S. (2020). Coordination between 945
GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR1 and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR1 plays a key role in 946
regulating leaf growth in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 20:200. 947
Luo A D, Liu L, Tang Z S, Bai X Q, Cao S Y, and Chu C C. (2005). Down-regulation of OsGRF1 948
gene in rice rhd1 mutant results in reduced heading date. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 47:745-752. 949
Luo X, Zheng J, Huang R, Huang Y, Wang H, Jiang L, and Fang X. (2016). Phytohormones 950
signaling and crosstalk regulating leaf angle in rice. Plant Cell Rep. 35:2423-2433. 951
Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z, Li H, Lin Y, et al. (2015). A 952
robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot 953
and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8:1274-1284. 954
Magome H, Nomura T, Hanada A, Takeda-Kamiya N, Ohnishi T, Shinma Y, Katsumata T, 955 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
33
Kawaide H, Kamiya Y, and Yamaguchi S. (2013). CYP714B1 and CYP714B2 encode gibberellin 956
13-oxidases that reduce gibberellin activity in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:1947-1952. 957
Omidbakhshfard M A, Proost S, Fujikura U, and Mueller-Roeber B. (2015). Growth-Regulating 958
Factors (GRFs): a small transcription factor family with important functions in plant biology. Mol. 959
Plant 8:998-1010. 960
Ookawa T, Hobo T, Yano M, Murata K, Ando T, Miura H, Asano K, Ochiai Y, Ikeda M, Nishitani 961
R, et al. (2010). New approach for rice improvement using a pleiotropic QTL gene for lodging 962
resistance and yield. Nat. Commun. 1:132. 963
Rodriguez R E, Mecchia M A, Debernardi J M, Schommer C, Weigel D, and Palatnik J F. (2009). 964
Control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development 965
137:103-112. 966
Sakata T, Oshino T, Miura S, Tomabechi M, Tsunaga Y, Higashitani N, Miyazawa Y, Takahashi H, 967
Watanabe M, and Higashitani A. (2010). Auxins reverse plant male sterility caused by high 968
temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:8569-8574. 969
Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Nishimura A, Swapan D, Ishiyama K, Saito T, 970
Kobayashi M, Khush G S, et al. (2002). Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in 971
rice. Nature 416:701-702. 972
Schaller G E, Bishopp A, and Kieber J J. (2015). The yin-yang of hormones: cytokinin and auxin 973
interactions in plant development. Plant Cell 27:44-63. 974
Sinclair T R, and Sheehy J E. (1999). Erect leaves and photosynthesis in rice. Science 975
283:1456-1457. 976
Springer N. (2010). Shaping a better rice plant. Nat. Genet. 42:475-476. 977
Tang J, and Chu C. (2017). MicroRNAs in crop improvement: fine-tuners for complex traits. Nat. 978
Plants 3:17077. 979
Tang Y, Liu H, Guo S, Wang B, Li Z, Chong K, and Xu Y. (2018). OsmiR396d affects gibberellin 980
and brassinosteroid signaling to regulate plant architecture in rice. Plant Physiol. 176:946-959. 981
Van Bel M, Proost S, Wischnitzki E, Movahedi S, Scheerlinck C, Van de Peer Y, and Vandepoele 982
K. (2012). Dissecting plant genomes with the PLAZA comparative genomics platform. Plant 983
Physiol. 158:590-600. 984
Walter M, Chaban C, Schutze K, Batistic O, Weckermann K, Nake C, Blazevic D, Grefen C, 985 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
34
Schumacher K, Oecking C, et al. (2004). Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells 986
using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Plant J. 40:428-438. 987
Wang B, Smith S M, and Li J. (2018). Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 988
69:437-468. 989
Wang L, Gu X, Xu D, Wang W, Wang H, Zeng M, Chang Z, Huang H, and Cui X. (2011). 990
miR396-targeted AtGRF transcription factors are required for coordination of cell division and 991
differentiation during leaf development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 62:761-773. 992
Wang S, Zhang S, Sun C, Xu Y, Chen Y, Yu C, Qian Q, Jiang D A, and Qi Y. (2014). Auxin 993
response factor (OsARF12), a novel regulator for phosphate homeostasis in rice (Oryza sativa). 994
New Phytol. 201:91-103. 995
Wang Y, and Li J. (2008). Molecular basis of plant architecture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:253-279. 996
Woodward A W, and Bartel B. (2005). Auxin: regulation, action, and interaction. Ann. Bot. 997
95:707-735. 998
Xing Y, and Zhang Q. (2010). Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 999
61:421-442. 1000
Yoo S D, Cho Y H, and Sheen J. (2007). Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system 1001
for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2:1565-1572. 1002
Zhang S, Wang S, Xu Y, Yu C, Shen C, Qian Q, Geisler M, Jiang de A, and Qi Y. (2015). The auxin 1003
response factor, OsARF19, controls rice leaf angles through positively regulating OsGH3-5 and 1004
OsBRI1. Plant Cell Environ. 38:638-654. 1005
Zhang W, Wu L, Wu X, Ding Y, Li G, Li J, Weng F, Liu Z, Tang S, Ding C, et al. (2016). Lodging 1006
resistance of japonica rice (Oryza Sativa L.): morphological and anatomical traits due to 1007
top-dressing nitrogen application rates. Rice 9:31. 1008
Zhao S Q, Xiang J J, and Xue H W. (2013). Studies on the rice LEAF INCLINATION1 (LC1), an 1009
IAA-amido synthetase, reveal the effects of auxin in leaf inclination control. Mol. Plant 6:174-187. 1010
Zhou L J, Xiao L T, and Xue H W. (2017). Dynamic cytology and transcriptional regulation of rice 1011
lamina joint development. Plant Physiol. 174:1728-1746. 1012
1013
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization. A, Gross morphology of WT, OsGRF7
overexpression (GRF7OE-1) and OsGRF7 RNAi (GRF7RNAi-1) plants. Scale bars, 15
cm. B, Comparison of the flag leaf angles (up-panel) and the top second leaf angles
(down-panel) between OsGRF7 transgenic lines. Scale bars, 1 cm. C, Transverse (up-
panel) and longitudinal (down-panel) section of internodes in WT, GRF7OE-1, and
GRF7RNAi-1 plants. Scale bars, 200 μm. D, Cell length of the internode. E, Culm wall
thickness of OsGRF7 transgenic lines. F, Transverse (up-panel) and longitudinal
(down-panel) section of the lamina joint of flag leaves. Scale bars, 200 μm. Red boxes
areas in up-panel are enlarged. Red arrows mean adaxial side cell layers measured in
the panel G. pc, parenchymal cell; vb, vascular bundle; ad, adaxial surface of the lamina
joint. G, Adaxial side cell layers of the transverse sections of lamina joints. Panels D,
E, and G: Values are means ± SD of five biological replicates. *** P < 0.001 (two-
tailed Student’s t-test).
WT
GRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1
Cel
l lay
ers (c
ross)15
10
5
0
WT
GRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1 WT
GRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1
0
20
40
60
***
WT
GRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1
***
C D E F
pc vb ad pc ad pc vb ad
&HOO�OHQJWK�RI��LQWHUQRGH��ȝ
P�
WT GRF7OE-1 GRF7RNAi-1WT GRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1BA
WT
GRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
&XOP�ZDOO�WKLFNQHVs
(ȝP�
***
***
G
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 2
Figure 2. OsGRF7 is mainly repressed by OsmiR396e and expresses in various tissues.
A, The OsGRF7 cleavage site sequence complementary to OsmiR396. The position
corresponding to the 5′ ends of the cleaved OsGRF7 mRNA determined by 5′ RACE
and the frequency of 5′ RACE clones corresponding to the cleavage site is shown by
the arrow. 8/12 means eight of twelve clones have OsmiR396 cleavage site. The
mutated sites in OsrGRF7 were marked in red. The asterisks indicate mis-matched sites
between OsmiR396 and OsGRF7. The gray box indicates the QLQ domain, the pink
box indicates the WRC domain, and the purple box indicates the C terminal of OsGRF7,
respectively. B, Protein immunoblotting of OsGRF7 coexpressed with OsmiR396s in
GRF7-GFP transgenic rice protoplasts. Vector and control mean with or without the
empty vector, respectively. Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining was used as
loading controls. The relative protein amounts were determined by ImageJ (NIH). C,
Relative expression levels of OsGRF7 and OsmiR396s were detected by RT-qPCR in
internode, root, inflorescence (10 cm), node, flag leaf, SAM (shoot apical meristem),
axillary bud, and lamina joint, respectively. D, GRF7pro:GUS expression patterns in
transgenic plants. (1) Small panicle branch. (2-4) Inflorescence at different stages. (5-
6) Spikelet. (7) Root tip. (8) Flag leaf. (9) Node. (10) Internode. (11) Axillary bud. (12)
Lamina joint of the 30-d seedling. Scale bars, 2 mm. E, Relative expression levels of
OsGRF7
OsmiR396e
OsmiR396d
OsmiR396i
OsmiR396c
OsmiR396b
OsmiR396h
OsmiR396a
OsmiR396f
OsmiR396g
internoderootinflorescenceSAMlamina jointaxillary budnodeflag leaf
í�í�0��
radicl
e
plumule
lamina
joint
intern
odeno
de
flag l
eaf
rootSAM
panic
le
auxil
lary b
ud0
��
��
30
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
leve
l of O
sGR
F7
QLQ WRC C terminal
FOHDYDJH�VLWH�������
GRF7anti-GFP
CBB staining0.73 0.69 0.43 ���� 0.98 ���� ���� ���� ����
OsmiR396c
OsmiR396e
OsmiR396f
OsmiR396g
OsmiR396h
OsmiR396i
OsmiR396a
vocto
rco
ntrol
� � 3 4 � 6 7
8 9 �� �� ��
A
B
C
D E
C C G U U C A A G A A A G C A U G U G G A A
G U C A A G UU C UU U C GG A C A C C U * *
OsGRF7OsmiR396
�¶
�¶
...
�¶
�¶...
C C G U A C UA G A A A U C A C G U A G A A ...�¶ ... �¶OsrGRF7 * *
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
OsGRF7 in different tissues analyzed with RT-qPCR. OsUBI was used as an internal
reference. Values are means ± SD of three biological replicates.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 3
Figure 3. ChIP analysis of the OsGRF7 target genes. A, Distribution of OsGRF7
binding peaks in the rice genome. B, Genes reproducibly associated with OsGRF7
binding sites in YP1 (young inflorescences with a length of ~0.5 cm) or YP2 (young
inflorescences with a length of ~2 cm). C, Putative OsGRF7-binding motif predicted
by DREME. D, Expression and purification of OsGRF7 protein in E. coli. The red
arrowhead indicates the purified OsGRF7 protein. E, EMSA validation of interaction
between OsGRF7 and motif ACRGDA (ACAGTA). TAAGTA was used as the control.
533
1259
563
Genes association with OsGRF7binding sites in YP1 (1096)
Genes association with OsGRF7binding sites in YP2 (1822)
70%
19%
9%
63%
21%
14%2% 2%ChIP-YP1 ChIP-YP2
gene intergenic
upstream upstream
down-stream
down-stream
gene
ACRGDAE-vaule 2.6e-21
0
1
2
70KD
Marker
Before
After
purifi
catio
n
purifi
catio
n
p-TAAGTA p-ACAGTA
free probe
shift
competitorprobeGRF7 -
(ratio)-+
+
-+
-
-+
+
++
+
++
+
++ ChIP-YP1
ChIP-YP2
ChIP-YP1ChIP-YP2
OsCYP714B1
OsARF12
OsCYP714B1
WT
GRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1
GRF7KO-14
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Rel
ative
exp
ress
ion
leve
l **
*****
OsARF12
WT
GRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1
GRF7KO-14
0
1
2
3
Rel
ative
exp
ress
ion
leve
l **
** **
contr
ol
OsCYP71
4B1
OsARF12
0
2
4
6
8 NoAbsantibody
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
***
**G
CYP714B1::LUC
Contrro
l
OsGRF7
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
*
LUC
/REN
ratio
ARF12::LUC
Contrro
l
OsGRF7
0
5
10
15
***
LUC
/REN
ratio
J K
CompetitorProbeGRF7 -
(ratio)-+
+
-+
+
++
+
++
+
++
-
-+
+
-+
+
++
+
++
+
++
free probe
shift
p-CYP714B1 p-ARF12
Probe region-544bp -285bp -1003bp -817bp
M
A B C
D E F
H I
L
intergenic
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
F, OsGRF7 binding peaks in the promoters of OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12. Blue boxes
indicate probe locations. Bar = 1 kb. G, ChIP-qPCR validation of OsGRF7 binding sites
in the promoters of OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12. The fold enrichment was normalized
against the promoter of OsUBI. No addition of antibodies (NoAbs) served as a negative
control. H and I, Relative expression levels of the OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12 detected
with RT-qPCR. OsUBI was used as an internal reference. J and K, OsGRF7 actives
OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12 promoter-luciferase fusion constructs in transient
transactivation assays. L and M, EMSA validation of bindings between OsGRF7 and
promoters of OsCYP714B1 and OsARF12, respectively. The 2-, 10- and 100- fold
unmodified probes were used as competitors. The presence (+) or absence (-) of
components in the reaction mixture was indicated. Red triangles indicate the site of
ACRGDA motifs on promoter region. Panels G-K: Values are means ± SD of three
biological replicates. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t-
test).
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 4
Figure 4. OsGRF7 regulates expression of multiple IAA/GA-related genes. A, Relative
expression levels of auxin signaling related and GA synthesis related genes in the
lamina joint of the OsGRF7 transgenic lines. OsUBI was used as an internal reference.
B to J, GRF7-GFP mediated ChIP-qPCR enrichment (relative to the promoter region
of OsUBI) of ACRGDA-containing fragments (marked with arrowhead) from
promoters of auxin signaling related genes (ARF3, ARF4, ARF8, ARF9, PIN1b, PIN1d,
and PIN8) and GA synthesis related genes (SLR1 and SLRL1). The promoter region of
OsUBI was used as a control. K and L, OsGRF7 actives ARF3, ARF4, ARF8, ARF9,
PIN1b, PIN1d, PIN8, SLR1, and SLRL1 promoter-luciferase fusion constructs in
transient transactivation assays. Panels B-J, L: Values are means ± SD of three
biological replicates. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t-
test).
ARF3
0
5
10
15
***
*** ******
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
0
5
10
15
***
**
***
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
****
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
0
5
10
15
***
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
0
1
2
3
* **
**
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
*
***
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
0
1
2
3
4
******
***
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
SLR1
0
1
2
3
4
5
******
***
*
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
SLRL1
0
1
2
3
4
*
*** ***
***
Fold
enr
ichm
ent
1 2 3 4ARF4
1 2 3ARF8
1 23 4
ARF92 1
PIN1b1 4 523 PIN1d
1 2 3PIN8
1 2 3 1 2 43
1 2 43
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 4
1 2 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 41 2 3 1 2 3
1 2 3 4
5
OsGRF7
OsARF3
OsARF4
OsARF8
OsARF9
OsPIN
1b
OsPIN
1d
OsPIN
8
OsSLR
1
OsSLR
L10
1
2
3
4
5
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
leve
l WTGRF7OE-1
GRF7RNAi-1GRF7KO-14
***
***
***
*** **
***
*
*****
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
**
***
***
*
p35S MCS Nos ter
promoters LUC CaMV ter
p35S REN CaMV ter
p35S GRF7 Nos ter
Control
Reporter
Internal control
Effector
pARF3::
LUC
pARF4::
LUC
pARF8::
LUC
pARF9::
LUC
pPIN
1b::L
UC
pPIN
1d::L
UC
pPIN
8::LU
C
pSLR
1::LU
C
pSLR
L1::L
UC0
5
10
15 ControlOsGRF7
LUC
/REN
ratio
***
* **
**
**
**
**
*
A B C D
E F G H I
J K L
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Endogenous phytohormone contents and exogenous phytohormone
sensitivity test of OsGRF7 transgenic lines. A and B, Quantification of GA (A) and IAA
(B) derivatives in OsGRF7 transgenic seedlings detected with LC-MS/MS. Values are
means ± SD of three biological replicates. * P < 0.05 (two-tailed Student’s t-test).
Abbreviations: ME-IAA, methyl indole-3-acetate; ICA, indole-3-carboxaldehyde; IAA,
indole-3-acetic acid; NAA, 1-naphthylacetic acid. F.W., fresh weight. nd indicate not
detected (below the detection limit). C, Immunohistochemical observation (IHC) of
indole-3-acetic acid at the lamina joint of OsGRF7 transgenic lines. Anti-IAA antibody
and Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody were used. Scale bars, 100 μm.
D, Phenotypes of OsGRF7 transgenic seedlings treated by different concentrations of
phytohormones. The same control has been used for 0 μM IAA and GA. Scale bars, 2
cm. E, Effects of different concentrations of IAA on primary root length in WT,
GRF7OE-1, and GRF7RNAi-1. Values are means ± SD (n = 15, three biological
replicates and five plants per replicate). F, Effects of different concentrations of GA3 on
the second sheath length in WT, GRF7OE-1, and GRF7RNAi-1 seedlings. Values are
means ± SD (n = 15, three biological replicates and five plants per replicate). Different
letters denote significant differences (P < 0.05) from Duncan’s multiple range tests.
0
2
4
6
8
c bc bc
de
Prim
ary
root
leng
th (c
m)
0 0.1 1 10,$$�FRQFHQWUDWLRQ��ȝ0�
0
1
2
3
4 WTGRF7OE-1GRF7RNAi-1
f ef
Seco
nd s
heat
h le
ngth
(cm
)
0 0.1 1 10GA3�FRQFHQWUDWLRQ��ȝ0�
GA1GA3
GA4GA7
GA80.000.020.040.060.080.10
1234
GA
conc
entra
tion
(ng/
gF.W
.)
nd
0(�,$$
ICA
IAA
NAA0
1
2
3
4
5
Auxi
n co
ncen
tratio
n (n
g/gF
.W.)
IAA
GA3
WT*5)�2(��
*5)�51$L��
WT *5
)�2(��
*5)�51$L��
WT*5)�2(��
*5)�51$L��
WT*5)�2(��
*5)�51$L��
��ȝ0 ����ȝ0 ��ȝ0 ���ȝ0
WTGRF7OE-1GRF7RNAi-1
WTGRF7OE-1GRF7RNAi-1
*
*
WTGRF7OE-1GRF7RNAi-1
BA
E
D
**
*
WT
*5)�2
(��
*5)�5
1$L��
*5)�.
2���
C
F
cros
s se
ctio
nlo
ngitu
dina
l sec
tion
aa a
b
d
e e
efef ef
ce d
b b
a
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 6
Figure 6. A proposed model for the regulation of rice plant architecture by OsGRF7.
In GRF7OE plants, OsGRF7 co-activates with OsGIFs to up-regulate the expressions
of downstream hormone-related genes through binding to ACRGDA motifs. Then the
synthesis of GA4 is inhibited, and the synthesis of IAA is promoted. Finally, the
GRF7OE plants display a semi-dwarf and compact plant architecture. Abbreviations:
IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; GA, gibberellin.
ACRGDAGRF7GIFs
GRF7GIFs
ACRGDAGRF7GIFs
OsARFsOsPINsOsSLR1OsSLRL1OsCYP714B1
OsARFsOsPINsOsSLR1OsSLRL1OsCYP714B1
GRF7
GIFsGRF7
GIFs
GRF7 GIFs
GRF7
GIFs
GRF7
GIFs
GRF7
GIFs
GRF7
GIFs
GRF7
GRF7
GIFs
GRF7 GIFs
GRF7
GIFs
GRF7
GIFsGIFs
GIFsGRF7GIFs
IAA
GA
IAA
GA
WT
GRF7OE
GRF7
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsBailey T L. (2011). DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics 27:1653-1659.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Baucher M, Moussawi J, Vandeputte O M, Monteyne D, Mol A, Perez-Morga D, and El Jaziri M. (2013). A role for the miR396/GRFnetwork in specification of organ type during flower development, as supported by ectopic expression of Populus trichocarpa miR396cin transgenic tobacco. Plant Biol. 15:892-898.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chandran V, Wang H, Gao F, Cao X L, Chen Y P, Li G B, Zhu Y, Yang X M, Zhang L L, Zhao Z X, et al. (2018). miR396-OsGRFs modulebalances growth and rice blast disease-resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1999.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Che R, Tong H, Shi B, Liu Y, Fang S, Liu D, Xiao Y, Hu B, Liu L, Wang H, et al. (2015). Control of grain size and rice yield by GL2-mediated brassinosteroid responses. Nat. Plants 2:15195.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chen X, Lu S, Wang Y, Zhang X, Lv B, Luo L, Xi D, Shen J, Ma H, and Ming F. (2015). OsNAC2 encoding a NAC transcription factor thataffects plant height through mediating the gibberellic acid pathway in rice. Plant J. 82:302-314.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choi D, Kim J H, and Kende H. (2004). Whole genome analysis of the OsGRF gene family encoding plant-specific putative transcriptionactivators in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Cell Physiology 45:897-904.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djami-Tchatchou A T, Sanan-Mishra N, Ntushelo K, and Dubery I A. (2017). Functional roles of microRNAs in agronomically importantplants-potential as targets for crop improvement and protection. Front. Plant Sci. 8:378.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ercoli M F, Ferela A, Debernardi J M, Perrone A P, Rodriguez R E, and Palatnik J F. (2018). GIF transcriptional co-regulators controlroot meristem homeostasis. Plant Cell 30:347-359.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng J, Liu T, Qin B, Zhang Y, and Liu X S. (2012). Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. Nat. Protoc. 7:1728-1740.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao F, Wang K, Liu Y, Chen Y, Chen P, Shi Z, Luo J, Jiang D, Fan F, Zhu Y, et al. (2015). Blocking miR396 increases rice yield by shapinginflorescence architecture. Nat. Plants 2:15196.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao S, Fang J, Xu F, Wang W, and Chu C. (2016). Rice HOX12 regulates panicle exsertion by directly modulating the expression ofELONGATED UPPERMOST INTERNODE1. Plant Cell 28:680-695.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hu J, Wang Y, Fang Y, Zeng L, Xu J, Yu H, Shi Z, Pan J, Zhang D, Kang S, et al. (2015). A rare allele of GS2 enhances grain size andgrain yield in rice. Mol. Plant 8:1455-1465.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jeong D H, An S, Kang H G, Moon S, Han J J, Park S, Lee H S, An K, and An G. (2002). T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for activationtagging in rice. Plant Physiol. 130:1636-1644.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Khush G S. (1995). Breaking the yield frontier of rice. GeoJournal 35:329–332.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim J H, Choi D, and Kende H. (2003). The AtGRF family of putative transcriptioon factors is involved in leaf and cotyledon growth inArabidopsis. Plant J. 36:94-104.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Kim J H, and Kende H. (2004). A transcriptional coactivator, AtGIF1, is involved in regulating leaf growth and morphology inArabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:13374-13379.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim J H, and Lee B H. (2006). GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR4 of Arabidopsis thaliana is required for development of leaves,cotyledons, and shoot apical meristem. J. Plant Biol. 49:463-468.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kobayashi M, Yamaguchi I, Murofushi N, Ota Y, and Takahashi N. (1988). Fluctuation and localization of endogenous gibberellins inrice. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 52:1189-1194.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kozomara A, and Griffiths-Jones S. (2014). miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. NucleicAcids Res. 42:D68-73.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kuijt S J, Greco R, Agalou A, Shao J, t Hoen C C, Overnas E, Osnato M, Curiale S, Meynard D, van Gulik R, et al. (2014). Interactionbetween the GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR and KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX families of transcription factors. Plant Physiol.164:1952-1966.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, and Tamura K. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computingplatforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547-1549.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, and Salzberg S L. (2009). Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to thehuman genome. Genome Biol. 10:R25.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lavy M, and Estelle M. (2016). Mechanisms of auxin signaling. Development 143:3226-3229.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li S, Gao F, Xie K, Zeng X, Cao Y, Zeng J, He Z, Ren Y, Li W, Deng Q, et al. (2016). The OsmiR396c-OsGRF4-OsGIF1 regulatory moduledetermines grain size and yield in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14:2134-2146.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li S, Tian Y, Wu K, Ye Y, Yu J, Zhang J, Liu Q, Hu M, Li H, Tong Y, et al. (2018). Modulating plant growth-metabolism coordination forsustainable agriculture. Nature 560:595-600.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li Y, Li J, Chen Z, Wei Y, Qi Y, and Wu C. (2020). OsmiR167a-targeted auxin response factors modulate tiller angle via fine-tuning auxindistribution in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 10.1111/pbi.13360.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu D, Song Y, Chen Z, and Yu D. (2009). Ectopic expression of miR396 suppresses GRF target gene expression and alters leaf growthin Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 136:223-236.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu H, Guo S, Xu Y, Li C, Zhang Z, Zhang D, Xu S, Zhang C, and Chong K. (2014). OsmiR396d-regulated OsGRFs function in floralorganogenesis in rice through binding to their targets OsJMJ706 and OsCR4. Plant Physiol. 165:160-174.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu T. (2014). Use Model-Based Analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS) to analyze short reads generated by sequencing protein-DNA interactionsin embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1150:81-95.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lu Y, Meng Y, Zeng J, Luo Y, Feng Z, Bian L, and Gao S. (2020). Coordination between GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR1 and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR1 plays a key role in regulating leaf growth in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 20:200.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Luo A D, Liu L, Tang Z S, Bai X Q, Cao S Y, and Chu C C. (2005). Down-regulation of OsGRF1 gene in rice rhd1 mutant results inreduced heading date. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 47:745-752.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Luo X, Zheng J, Huang R, Huang Y, Wang H, Jiang L, and Fang X. (2016). Phytohormones signaling and crosstalk regulating leaf anglein rice. Plant Cell Rep. 35:2423-2433.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z, Li H, Lin Y, et al. (2015). A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient,high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8:1274-1284.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Magome H, Nomura T, Hanada A, Takeda-Kamiya N, Ohnishi T, Shinma Y, Katsumata T, Kawaide H, Kamiya Y, and Yamaguchi S. (2013).CYP714B1 and CYP714B2 encode gibberellin 13-oxidases that reduce gibberellin activity in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:1947-1952.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Omidbakhshfard M A, Proost S, Fujikura U, and Mueller-Roeber B. (2015). Growth-Regulating Factors (GRFs): a small transcriptionfactor family with important functions in plant biology. Mol. Plant 8:998-1010.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ookawa T, Hobo T, Yano M, Murata K, Ando T, Miura H, Asano K, Ochiai Y, Ikeda M, Nishitani R, et al. (2010). New approach for riceimprovement using a pleiotropic QTL gene for lodging resistance and yield. Nat. Commun. 1:132.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rodriguez R E, Mecchia M A, Debernardi J M, Schommer C, Weigel D, and Palatnik J F. (2009). Control of cell proliferation inArabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development 137:103-112.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sakata T, Oshino T, Miura S, Tomabechi M, Tsunaga Y, Higashitani N, Miyazawa Y, Takahashi H, Watanabe M, and Higashitani A. (2010).Auxins reverse plant male sterility caused by high temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:8569-8574.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Nishimura A, Swapan D, Ishiyama K, Saito T, Kobayashi M, Khush G S, et al. (2002).Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416:701-702.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Schaller G E, Bishopp A, and Kieber J J. (2015). The yin-yang of hormones: cytokinin and auxin interactions in plant development. PlantCell 27:44-63.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sinclair T R, and Sheehy J E. (1999). Erect leaves and photosynthesis in rice. Science 283:1456-1457.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Springer N. (2010). Shaping a better rice plant. Nat. Genet. 42:475-476.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tang J, and Chu C. (2017). MicroRNAs in crop improvement: fine-tuners for complex traits. Nat. Plants 3:17077.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tang Y, Liu H, Guo S, Wang B, Li Z, Chong K, and Xu Y. (2018). OsmiR396d affects gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling to regulateplant architecture in rice. Plant Physiol. 176:946-959.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Van Bel M, Proost S, Wischnitzki E, Movahedi S, Scheerlinck C, Van de Peer Y, and Vandepoele K. (2012). Dissecting plant genomeswith the PLAZA comparative genomics platform. Plant Physiol. 158:590-600.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter M, Chaban C, Schutze K, Batistic O, Weckermann K, Nake C, Blazevic D, Grefen C, Schumacher K, Oecking C, et al. (2004).
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Plant J. 40:428-438.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang B, Smith S M, and Li J. (2018). Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69:437-468.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang L, Gu X, Xu D, Wang W, Wang H, Zeng M, Chang Z, Huang H, and Cui X. (2011). miR396-targeted AtGRF transcription factors arerequired for coordination of cell division and differentiation during leaf development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 62:761-773.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang S, Zhang S, Sun C, Xu Y, Chen Y, Yu C, Qian Q, Jiang D A, and Qi Y. (2014). Auxin response factor (OsARF12), a novel regulatorfor phosphate homeostasis in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 201:91-103.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y, and Li J. (2008). Molecular basis of plant architecture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:253-279.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Woodward A W, and Bartel B. (2005). Auxin: regulation, action, and interaction. Ann. Bot. 95:707-735.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xing Y, and Zhang Q. (2010). Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61:421-442.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yoo S D, Cho Y H, and Sheen J. (2007). Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expressionanalysis. Nat. Protoc. 2:1565-1572.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang S, Wang S, Xu Y, Yu C, Shen C, Qian Q, Geisler M, Jiang de A, and Qi Y. (2015). The auxin response factor, OsARF19, controlsrice leaf angles through positively regulating OsGH3-5 and OsBRI1. Plant Cell Environ. 38:638-654.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang W, Wu L, Wu X, Ding Y, Li G, Li J, Weng F, Liu Z, Tang S, Ding C, et al. (2016). Lodging resistance of japonica rice (Oryza SativaL.): morphological and anatomical traits due to top-dressing nitrogen application rates. Rice 9:31.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhao S Q, Xiang J J, and Xue H W. (2013). Studies on the rice LEAF INCLINATION1 (LC1), an IAA-amido synthetase, reveal the effects ofauxin in leaf inclination control. Mol. Plant 6:174-187.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou L J, Xiao L T, and Xue H W. (2017). Dynamic cytology and transcriptional regulation of rice lamina joint development. Plant Physiol.174:1728-1746.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 30, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.