Evaluating the impact of theQuality Research in Dementia (QRD)

Consumer Network on the Alzheimer’s Society’s

Research Programme

Shirley Nurock Ted FreerMembers of QRD consumer network

QRD Involvement in research

• Brainstorming – research priorities

• Application review and prioritisation

• Award Panels

• Project Monitoring

• Dissemination

AIMS

1) To determine the quality of the research funded

2) To determine value of consumer involvement in Alzheimer’s Society research

a) Compare pre and post 2000 QRD programme

b) Compare with an equivalent programme with no consumer involvement

c) Value for money

QRD Evaluation Project

Phase I

Collection of publications and other outcomes from completed projects

Phase II

Postal evaluation of project output and outcomes by QRD consumer network and scientists

EVALUATION CRITERIA

• Publication in scientific peer-reviewed journals using journal impact factors

• Results being used by other groups for policy, research and treatments

• Career development of researchers in dementia research and practice

• Increased awareness of dementia issues resulting from project

DEFINING THE QUESTIONS

Q1. How well were the objectives of the research proposal met?

 

Q2. How do you rank the level of output from the project?

Q3. How much difference will this research make to people with

dementia?

1--------2--------3--------4--------5--------6--------7--------8--------9--------10

Consumers answer questions by marking on a scale of 1-10, where

1 is a high score, and 10 is a very low score

RESULTSDiscrimination between

the three questionsfor same researcher

Q1. How well were the objectives of the research proposal met?

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SCORE

RES

PON

SES

Q2. How do you rank the level of output from the project?

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SCORE

RESP

ONSE

SQ3. How much difference will this research make to people with dementia?

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SCORE

RESP

ONSE

S

Researcher X

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SCORE

RES

ON

SE

RESULTSQ3. How much difference will this

research make to people with dementia?

Researcher Y

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SCORE

RESO

PNSE

Reseracher Z

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SCORE

RESP

ONS

ES

CONSUMER’S CONCERNS

• More informative final project reports

• Difficult to evaluate quality of output

• More information on what use was made of the results

• More information on grant holders subsequent activities

• Wider dissemination beyond scientific press

FURTHER EVALUATION

Phase III

Consumer-enhanced scientific committees evaluate selected projects

Phase IV

External peer review of the scientific quality of research funded

Phase V

Independent evaluation of the impact of consumer involvement both internally and externally to the Alzheimer’s Society

CONCLUSIONS

• This is an ongoing innovative study

• Stepwise development

• Consumers can evaluate output and quality

Further Information

www.qrd.alzheimers.org.uk

Telephone QRD Office : 020 7306 0845

INFORMATION PROVIDED

• Short summary & conclusion

• Final Report documenting Publications & Abstracts with journal Impact Factors 

• Books and/or chapters 

• Conference oral & poster presentations 

• Further research resulting from project 

• Career progression of researchers