Shifting Gears #5: What If This Storm Ends? Feraco Myth to Science Fiction 23 April 2010.
-
Upload
madeleine-phillips -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Shifting Gears #5: What If This Storm Ends? Feraco Myth to Science Fiction 23 April 2010.
Shifting Gears #5: What If Shifting Gears #5: What If This Storm Ends?This Storm Ends?
FeracoFeracoMyth to Science FictionMyth to Science Fiction
23 April 201023 April 2010
What is Death?What is Death? What is Death?What is Death? Monism and Dualism IIMonism and Dualism II Why Fear Death?Why Fear Death? How Should We Greet Death?How Should We Greet Death? Plato’s Take on the Soul (and Death)Plato’s Take on the Soul (and Death) The Moral Argument Against AnnihilationThe Moral Argument Against Annihilation What If There’s Nothing Beyond This?What If There’s Nothing Beyond This? Is There Hope for Existence After Death?Is There Hope for Existence After Death? Our Own ValhallasOur Own Valhallas
What is Death?What is Death? Numerous cultures and theologies provide Numerous cultures and theologies provide
different explanations for what death different explanations for what death actually isactually is Why don’t we have a “Unified Theory of Why don’t we have a “Unified Theory of
Death”?Death”? However, it’s useful to begin with our old However, it’s useful to begin with our old
logiclogic Not Cherry or Stacey or Amy and their Not Cherry or Stacey or Amy and their
midterms – merely the Law of the Excluded midterms – merely the Law of the Excluded Middle and the Law of NoncontradictionMiddle and the Law of Noncontradiction
Either something lies beyond death – Either something lies beyond death – regardless of what it is – or nothing doesregardless of what it is – or nothing does Either P or Not P is true, and P and Not P cannot be Either P or Not P is true, and P and Not P cannot be
true simultaneouslytrue simultaneously For the sake of our exploration today, For the sake of our exploration today,
we’ll consider bothwe’ll consider both
The End of the StormThe End of the Storm Scientifically speaking, death represents Scientifically speaking, death represents
the end of corporeal existencethe end of corporeal existence ““Corporeal” = “Physical” – “Corpus” Corporeal” = “Physical” – “Corpus” Body Body
CorpseCorpse It seems like such a simple dealIt seems like such a simple deal
To a materialist, it is – but to others, not so To a materialist, it is – but to others, not so muchmuch
If you are a materialist, you don’t believe in a If you are a materialist, you don’t believe in a division between realms – you think division between realms – you think thisthis is it is it
This doesn’t mean that a dualist This doesn’t mean that a dualist can’tcan’t believe believe this is it – just that dualism is a prerequisite this is it – just that dualism is a prerequisite belief if one wants to believe in some sort of belief if one wants to believe in some sort of afterlife or reincarnationafterlife or reincarnation
MonistsMonists As you might expect, a monist doesn’t As you might expect, a monist doesn’t
think anything happens after death – or think anything happens after death – or happened before lifehappened before life
Notice this isn’t a debate about when life Notice this isn’t a debate about when life startsstarts
This works for idealists (who believe we’re This works for idealists (who believe we’re nothing but mental energy and nothing but mental energy and projections) as well as for materialistsprojections) as well as for materialists
The idealists, after all, recognize that The idealists, after all, recognize that death “happens” – and so assume it death “happens” – and so assume it represents the fundamental ending of a represents the fundamental ending of a consciousness consciousness
DualistsDualists A dualist, on the other hand, A dualist, on the other hand,
operates under the principle that operates under the principle that there’s more to us than meets the there’s more to us than meets the eyeeye
Again, you don’t have to believe in Again, you don’t have to believe in an afterlife if you’re a dualistan afterlife if you’re a dualist
However, a belief in something after However, a belief in something after death requires you to assume that death requires you to assume that humans are more than sacks of meat humans are more than sacks of meat and bonesand bones
The Shape of the FearThe Shape of the Fear If you’re a monist, can you fear death?If you’re a monist, can you fear death? Sure – there’s a push and pull between Sure – there’s a push and pull between
accepting what you see as the natural accepting what you see as the natural necessity of death and facing the necessity of death and facing the overwhelming terror of oblivionoverwhelming terror of oblivion
Plus, an interesting possibility: What if Plus, an interesting possibility: What if you’re wrong?you’re wrong?
Is this a good or bad thing?Is this a good or bad thing? I suppose it dependsI suppose it depends
If you’re a dualist, should you fear death?If you’re a dualist, should you fear death? Sure – What if Sure – What if you’reyou’re wrong? wrong? Plus, who’s to say you live well even if Plus, who’s to say you live well even if
you’re a dualist?you’re a dualist?
We Fear, In No Particular We Fear, In No Particular Order…Order… ““Man is the only animal that contemplates death, Man is the only animal that contemplates death,
and also the only animal that shows any sign of and also the only animal that shows any sign of doubt of its finality.”doubt of its finality.”
William Ernest HockingWilliam Ernest Hocking The realization of a deep-seated fear – that The realization of a deep-seated fear – that
something we did in life will come back to haunt something we did in life will come back to haunt usus
The possibility that The possibility that nothingnothing we do will impact our we do will impact our fatefate
That the end will involve sufferingThat the end will involve suffering The fact that the end remains unknown to us – a The fact that the end remains unknown to us – a
mysterymystery The possibility, in turn, that The possibility, in turn, that nothingnothing awaits us awaits us Finally, the possibility that your deeply-held Finally, the possibility that your deeply-held
belief about the end is wrong – that something belief about the end is wrong – that something else will happenelse will happen
The Questions…The Questions… If you’re wrong about death, were If you’re wrong about death, were
you wrong about life?you wrong about life? How should one greet death?How should one greet death? Really, the flip side to that question Really, the flip side to that question
is “How do we greet life?”is “How do we greet life?” Do we tread more or less carefully, Do we tread more or less carefully,
depending on how we feel about the depending on how we feel about the end?end?
Should we?Should we?
The ApproachThe Approach You can approach death fearfully You can approach death fearfully
(understandably so)(understandably so) You can approach death calmlyYou can approach death calmly After all, all of us dieAfter all, all of us die For that matter, none of us even know it’s For that matter, none of us even know it’s
an unpleasant experiencean unpleasant experience You can even take the Epicurian approachYou can even take the Epicurian approach ““Death, the most dreaded of evils, is Death, the most dreaded of evils, is
therefore of no concern to us; for while we therefore of no concern to us; for while we exist, death is not present, and when exist, death is not present, and when death is present, we no longer exist.”death is present, we no longer exist.”
EpicurusEpicurus
Plato Approaches DeathPlato Approaches Death The great philosopher Plato took a The great philosopher Plato took a
physically practical approach to the physically practical approach to the study of death study of death
The philosophical equivalent of the The philosophical equivalent of the “21 Grams” experiment, hundreds of “21 Grams” experiment, hundreds of years agoyears ago
The ArgumentThe Argument He argued physical objects don’t just stop existingHe argued physical objects don’t just stop existing If you want to “kill” a chair, what do you do?If you want to “kill” a chair, what do you do? Breaking it up just separates it into its componentsBreaking it up just separates it into its components Even burning it leaves ashes – the chair’s been Even burning it leaves ashes – the chair’s been
transformed into something else, but not eradicated transformed into something else, but not eradicated from existencefrom existence
The same thing holds true for a statue – if it falls over, The same thing holds true for a statue – if it falls over, it breaks into little shards, but the stone remainsit breaks into little shards, but the stone remains
This, he argues, is how things get destroyed in our This, he argues, is how things get destroyed in our world – they break down into components, but they world – they break down into components, but they aren’t eradicatedaren’t eradicated
Plato, a dualist, then goes on to argue that since the Plato, a dualist, then goes on to argue that since the soul is not substance, it cannot be broken down into soul is not substance, it cannot be broken down into partsparts
Since it can’t be broken down, it cannot be destroyedSince it can’t be broken down, it cannot be destroyed
Idealist ObjectionIdealist Objection Plato’s thought process may hold true for Plato’s thought process may hold true for
physical things – but is everything in this world physical things – but is everything in this world physical?physical?
This is the sort of question that makes a This is the sort of question that makes a materialist angry materialist angry
One would insist that everything One would insist that everything isis physical, and physical, and that it therefore makes no sense for there to be that it therefore makes no sense for there to be this mysterious thing composed of something this mysterious thing composed of something unknowable beyond sensationunknowable beyond sensation
If you’re not a materialist, however, you If you’re not a materialist, however, you acknowledge that there are a variety of different acknowledge that there are a variety of different “substances” in the world“substances” in the world
Is the beam from my laser pointer made from the Is the beam from my laser pointer made from the same “stuff” as the grass on the library lawn?same “stuff” as the grass on the library lawn?
Stopping ExistenceStopping Existence Things do exist that stop existingThings do exist that stop existing Where does light go when you shut Where does light go when you shut
off its source?off its source? Possibly nowhere – possibly Possibly nowhere – possibly
everywhereeverywhere If I play a note on the piano, does it If I play a note on the piano, does it
play forever?play forever? What if I destroy the piano? Can the What if I destroy the piano? Can the
note live on without its host – its note live on without its host – its source?source?
Linking the SoulLinking the Soul How does Plato know that the soul How does Plato know that the soul
isn’t made of something as isn’t made of something as transitory as a musical note – or a transitory as a musical note – or a physical body?physical body?
Then again, if the soul isn’t meant to Then again, if the soul isn’t meant to endure, endure, what’s the point of onewhat’s the point of one??
With death – as with many other With death – as with many other things – human questions lead to things – human questions lead to more questionsmore questions
The Moral Argument Against The Moral Argument Against AnnihilationAnnihilation We often wonder about the meaning of life in the We often wonder about the meaning of life in the
context of the meaning of deathcontext of the meaning of death If there’s no “beyond,” many wonder, is there If there’s no “beyond,” many wonder, is there
any point to the “here and now”?any point to the “here and now”? Some would argue that the lack of a “beyond” Some would argue that the lack of a “beyond”
makes the good we perform in this life even more makes the good we perform in this life even more important; if this is all we get, why not make it as important; if this is all we get, why not make it as wonderful for everyone as possible?wonderful for everyone as possible?
““I expect to pass through life but once. If I expect to pass through life but once. If therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or any good thing I can do to any fellow being, let any good thing I can do to any fellow being, let me do it now, and not defer or neglect it, as I me do it now, and not defer or neglect it, as I shall not pass this way again.”shall not pass this way again.”
William PennWilliam Penn
Nothing Could Be So CruelNothing Could Be So Cruel Others, however, argue that life Others, however, argue that life
must have meaning – and that, if life must have meaning – and that, if life has meaning, it is meaningful has meaning, it is meaningful becausebecause of goodness of goodness
They submit that in a moral, They submit that in a moral, meaningful universe, goodness meaningful universe, goodness cannot be annihilated – it wouldn’t cannot be annihilated – it wouldn’t check out morallycheck out morally
What a waste, we think – nothing What a waste, we think – nothing could be so cruelcould be so cruel
What If There’s Nothing After What If There’s Nothing After This?This? How would our lives in this “plane” (using How would our lives in this “plane” (using
the dualist system) change if nothing lies the dualist system) change if nothing lies beyond?beyond?
Is Penn’s philosophy best?Is Penn’s philosophy best? Should we throw morality out the window?Should we throw morality out the window? Does the mystery surrounding death Does the mystery surrounding death
actually help us live better lives?actually help us live better lives? It depends on your view regarding fear, I It depends on your view regarding fear, I
suppose – is it a positive or negative suppose – is it a positive or negative force?force?
Is There Hope For Existence Is There Hope For Existence Beyond Death?Beyond Death? Many theologies and cultures account for some Many theologies and cultures account for some
sort of continued existencesort of continued existence One wonders if this shared tendency towards a One wonders if this shared tendency towards a
reverence for an “afterlife” is meaningful in and reverence for an “afterlife” is meaningful in and of itself, or if it merely reveals something of itself, or if it merely reveals something interesting about the human character – interesting about the human character – whatever that interesting thing may bewhatever that interesting thing may be
We have people who claim to have been We have people who claim to have been contacted from beyond, or to have come back contacted from beyond, or to have come back from the brink of deathfrom the brink of death
In some cases, people insist that they remember In some cases, people insist that they remember previous lives – previous revolutions of the previous lives – previous revolutions of the Samsara cycle, perhapsSamsara cycle, perhaps
Hope in the MysteryHope in the Mystery In any event, the mystery surrounding death – In any event, the mystery surrounding death –
the sheer enormity of all that we don’t know – the sheer enormity of all that we don’t know – isn’t necessarily a prescription for negative isn’t necessarily a prescription for negative possibilitiespossibilities
After all, if we don’t know whether we continue After all, if we don’t know whether we continue beyond our corporeal end, we don’t know that we beyond our corporeal end, we don’t know that we can’tcan’t continue continue
Perhaps that’s part of the meanings of life Perhaps that’s part of the meanings of life andand death: that we have an opportunity to explore death: that we have an opportunity to explore the infinite possibilities of existence – and, in the infinite possibilities of existence – and, in turn, the infinite possibility for discovery, both of turn, the infinite possibility for discovery, both of new answers and new questionsnew answers and new questions
Remember the lessons of last week: Don’t aim Remember the lessons of last week: Don’t aim for a target with the intention of hitting it and for a target with the intention of hitting it and stopping – always aim toward, through, and stopping – always aim toward, through, and beyondbeyond
Now It’s Your Turn!Now It’s Your Turn! You’ve already discussed choice, You’ve already discussed choice,
morality, happiness, and the soul.morality, happiness, and the soul. Today, I’d like you to articulate your Today, I’d like you to articulate your
personal philosophy regarding death personal philosophy regarding death – what death means, what you – what death means, what you believe happens when we die, etc.believe happens when we die, etc.
Good luck!Good luck!