Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.
-
Upload
nelson-evans -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.
![Page 1: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Shared Library Management SystemReport on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST)
Summer 2011
![Page 2: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
History and Context•Shared ILS discussion has deep roots
o Part of conversation since merger (2003)o Shared ILS part of Strategic Agenda (2006)o First Shared ILS Team (2010) – total cost of ownershipo Related to work of other committees
•Exploration of emerging next gen systemso WSU Spokane/Riverpoint pilot of OCLC
Web-scale Management Systems (WMS)o Open Library Environment (OLE) partnero Sage/Evergreen implementationo Shared ILS RFI (2011)
![Page 3: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Advantages of a Shared ILS•Shared database maintenance• Integrated consortial lending•Lower system administration costs•Potential for collaborative tech services•Collaborative collection development•Shared electronic resources management•Leading edge technology
![Page 4: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SILST – Charge and TimelineCharge:• Develop and issue a Request for Information (RFI), evaluate
responses, and engage with respondents as appropriate to clarify and explore responses
• Recommend a procurement process and timeline for a shared ILS• Develop an initial projection of staffing needs• Recommend next steps
Timeline:• February 2011 Issue RFI• March 31, 2011RFI responses due• June 10, 2011 Final report and recommendations due• July 13-14, 2011 Council votes on recommendations
![Page 5: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SILST Members
John F. Helmer (Chair), Orbis Cascade Alliance
Natalie Beach, Chemeketa Community College
Beth Blakesley, Washington State University
Rachel Bridgewater, Reed College
Mark Dahl, Lewis and Clark College
Bill Jordan, University of Washington
![Page 6: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Why an RFI?
• RFI is intended to gather information to decide what action to take next
• Not attempting to pick a vendor, but to determine current state of the market
• Are there ILS vendors whose business and product plans, and strategic focus, intersect with the Alliance's Agenda?
• Conversational and exploratory: o "Here's where we want to go, how can you help us?"
o "What have we missed?"
• If we go to procurement, are we likely to get strong, viable responses from multiple vendors?
![Page 7: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Who Responded to the RFIVendor [Product]:
• ByWater Solutions [Koha]
• Electronic Online Systems International [EOS.Web]
• Equinox Software, Inc. [Evergreen]
• Ex Libris (USA) [Alma]
• Innovative Interfaces, Inc. [Sierra]
• LibLime [ArchivalWare DLS/Koha]
• OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. [WMS]
• Serials Solutions [Summon/360 Resource Management Consortium Edition]
• SirsiDynix [Symphony]
• The Library Corporation (TLC) [Library•Solution]
![Page 8: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What We Learned
Active and competitive marketSome alignment with Alliance goals:
oLowering total cost of ownership
oFacilitating collaborative tech services
Wide variation in advancement level of productsNew features/loss of old featuresDevelopment opportunities
![Page 9: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
A Second Look…
![Page 10: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What We Wanted to Know More About
•Cross system functionality•Summit•Collaborative tech services•Partners in related consortia•Funding• Implementation and timing
![Page 11: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
•Evergreen: “designed as a reaction to the limitations of then current integrated library systems for multiple library systems to share a common catalog”
•Highlights:oOpen source community development focuso "Equinox provides full-service implementation, support
and development services as well as full training and consulting services migrating to Evergreen."
oTraditional circulation, cataloging, acquisitionsoDiscovery, ERM not available at this time, but could be
developed
![Page 12: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
•Alma: “a cloud-based, unified resource management system for print, electronic resources and digital collections”
•Highlights:oOpen data with “community catalog”oStreamlining workflows across resource typesoBeyond MARCoBusiness analyticso Long-term preservationoBack office accompaniment to Primo discovery platform
![Page 13: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Sierra: “Sierra is the Open Services Platform that provides complete ILS functionality with the power and scale of modern software architecture.”
• Highlights:o Open access/service oriented architecture/library choiceo Trusted workflowo Enhanced administration and reportingo Quicker device adoptiono Resource independenceo Integration of print/electronic resource workflowso Developer communityo Cloud or local deployment
![Page 14: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Web-Scale Management Services: “the first Web-based, cooperative library management service”
• Highlights:o Scalable, Web-based platform for all basic library management
functionalityo Reduced Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) o Platform for all types of materials, regardless of format or method of
acquisitiono Network effects, sharing data o Concentrated data, bibliographic, item, vendor, and library registries and
repositorieso Sophisticated Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) o OCLC Cooperative Platform
![Page 15: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SILST Recommendations
1. Proceed with procurement
2. Alliance should lead procurement process (Model 1)
Full Report: http://bit.ly/SILST-Rpt
![Page 16: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Next Steps
•Council will consider SILST recommendations
If approved:•Board forms a procurement team•Board acts on team's recommendations and may
appoint a negotiation team•Board recommends next steps to Council•Final purchase decision made by Council
![Page 17: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Potential Timeline
2011
July Council decision on recommendations
2012
Feb-April RFP out for bid
June Council decision on purchase
Implementation timing depends on approval,
product selected, profiling considerations, etc.
July-Dec Profiling, data mapping, indexing, system configuration
2013
Jan-June First cohort migrates
2014
July-Dec Last cohort migrates
![Page 18: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Unknowns and Challenges
•Procurement and broad member involvement•Migration and staffing• Governance• Technical services• Systems support• Non-members
![Page 19: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Questions?
![Page 20: Shared Library Management System Report on the RFI from the Shared ILS Team (SILST) Summer 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051214/56649e415503460f94b32ffa/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Image CreditsSlide #1 – Orbis Cascade Alliance, http://www.orbiscascade.org/index/name-and-logo Slide #3 – AnimationLibrary, http://www.animationlibrary.com/sc/259/Excitement/ Slide #5 – Paul Sherman, http://www.wpclipart.com Slide #10 – Clker.com, http://www.clker.com/clipart-15943.html Slide #11 – #15
a. OCLC, http://www.oclc.org/ (edited)b. Ex Libris, http://www.exlibris.co.il/ c. Equinox Software, http://www.esilibrary.com/esi/ d. Evergreen, http://evergreen-ils.org/ e. Innovative Interfaces, http://www.iii.com/ (edited)
Slide #16 – Clip art licensed from the Clip Art Gallery on DiscoverySchool.com, http://school.discoveryeducation.com/clipart/clip/question.html Slide #21 – H. Varlan, http://www.flickr.com/photos/horiavarlan/4273168957/