Shahjalal University of Science and Technology Question 2015
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST)
2
1. Well-off and educated households engage in permanent migraon, and are likely to encourage household members’ migraon for educaonal purposes, whereas food insecure households are more likely to send child migrants and engage in seasonal migraon. 40% of migrants move to Dhaka and 31% toward district headquarters. 70% of migrants are aged between 15 and 29 years and have no previous work experi- ence. Among those employed at the origin, 38% works in agriculture. At desnaon only 2% of those finding a remuner- ated job are employed in agriculture, which is consistent with the expectaon that migraon from rural to urban areas reduces employment in agriculture. Most of the agricultural labourers are male, and only 2% connue working in agricul- ture at desnaon. One third of the migrants are children: 39% of them migrate to engage in studies; 17% work in the garment sector; 15% in service work; 13% in various types of wage labor at desnaon. Female child migrants engage in studies and garment sector employment more frequently than males 2. Poor households are mainly pushed into migraon, whereas well-off households are mainly pulled by opportuni- es at desnaon. Migrants are pushed by unemployment, poverty/food insecurity and insufficient educaon facilies. Poorer and food insecure households migrate less than food secure households, as they cannot afford migraon. While poverty pushes the labourers, illiterate, moderately educated, funconally landless and smallholders to strive for migraon, unemployment/underemployment and inadequate educaon facilies push the literate and wealthier households to engage in migraon. Pull factors for both poorer/food insecure and beer-off households include beer work and educaonal opportunies, higher wages and strong social networks at desnaon 3. At origin, 18% of migrant households report improved food security status and only 5% report deterioraon as result of migraon, despite the fact that 71% of migrant households reduced the total land they operate. Average daily per capita calorie intake for migrant households (2297.69) is higher than non-migrant households (2224.78). This is aributable to remiances (Tk. 38882 annually) that are used for food and non-food expenditures. Migrant households report increases in meal frequency, quality of food and the possibility of using less severe coping strategies than non-migrant households in periods of distress. 13% report posive impacts on the household’s economic condions: type of house and toilet, number of rooms and accumulaon of assets. 14% of Rural-urban Migraon and its Implicaons for Food Security in Bangladesh households reported improvements in educaonal status. Half of the households stated that their expectaons regarding the benefits of migraon were fully sasfied. An addional one-third was parally sasfied and 8% was dissasfied 4. At desnaon, migrants report improved food security (30% of the households), economic condions (18%) and educaon status (17%). However, 11% of migrants reported a deterioraon of food security condions at desnaon. Migrant households on average consume more calories per capita (2362.65) than non-migrant households (2300.21), use less severe coping strategies and report improvements in the frequency of meals, quality of food, type of house and toilet Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST) 12 1 What are the characteriscs of internal migraon? 1. As internal migraon improves household food security and well being, it is a livelihood opon of which households cannot be deprived. However, rapid migraon might also worsen living condions both at origin (by depleng human capital) and at desnaon (mainly as a result of congeson) 2. Policy makers can maximize the benefits of internal migraon by supporng iniaves that leverage the opportu- nies arising from migraon and remiances. For instance, enhancing the producve use of migrants’ remiances can be supported by facilitang safe and less costly money transfers, and promong financial inclusion through micro-finance and financial literacy programs and thus to facilitate savings, investments and access to credit 3. Improved incomes and living condions in rural areas are key to containing the pace of rural out-migraon. Sustained investments towards more diversified, higher value-added agriculture and rural non-farm acvies can increase incomes, employment and entrepreneurial opportunies both on and off farms. Enhanced access to diversified agricultural inputs and services (ranging from extension to credit), public invest- ment in infrastructure and support to private investments in rural agro-based markeng and processing are required to contain rural-urban income differenals 4. Enhanced educaon facilies in rural areas are required to reduce the need for children and youth to migrate for educa- onal purposes. Improved primary, secondary and vocaonal educaon can also contribute to enhancing labour skills and generang beer employment opportunies in both rural and urban areas Answers from the research Implicaons for Policy 2 What are the determinants of migraon? 3 Is the food security status of migrant households different from non-migrant households at origin? FPMU RESEARCH SUMMARY 4 Is the food security status of migrant households different from non-migrant households at desnaon?
Transcript of Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST)
1. Well-off and educated households engage in permanent migration, and are likely to encourage household members’ migration for educational purposes, whereas food insecure households are more likely to send child migrants and engage in seasonal migration. 40% of migrants move to Dhaka and 31% toward district headquarters. 70% of migrants are aged between 15 and 29 years and have no previous work experi-ence. Among those employed at the origin, 38% works in agriculture. At destination only 2% of those finding a remuner-ated job are employed in agriculture, which is consistent with the expectation that migration from rural to urban areas reduces employment in agriculture. Most of the agricultural labourers are male, and only 2% continue working in agricul-ture at destination. One third of the migrants are children: 39% of them migrate to engage in studies; 17% work in the garment sector; 15% in service work; 13% in various types of wage labor at destination. Female child migrants engage in studies and garment sector employment more frequently than males2. Poor households are mainly pushed into migration, whereas well-off households are mainly pulled by opportuni-ties at destination. Migrants are pushed by unemployment, poverty/food insecurity and insufficient education facilities. Poorer and food insecure households migrate less than food secure households, as they cannot afford migration. While poverty pushes the labourers, illiterate, moderately educated, functionally landless and smallholders to strive for migration, unemployment/underemployment and inadequate education facilities push the literate and wealthier households to engage in migration. Pull factors for both poorer/food insecure and better-off households include better work and educational opportunities, higher wages and strong social networks at destination3. At origin, 18% of migrant households report improved food security status and only 5% report deterioration as result of migration, despite the fact that 71% of migrant households reduced the total land they operate. Average daily per capita calorie intake for migrant households (2297.69) is higher than non-migrant households (2224.78). This is attributable to remittances (Tk. 38882 annually) that are used for food and non-food expenditures. Migrant households report increases in meal frequency, quality of food and the possibility of using less severe coping strategies than non-migrant households in periods of distress. 13% report positive impacts on the household’s economic conditions: type of house and toilet, number of rooms and accumulation of assets. 14% of
Rural-urban Migration and its Implications for Food Security in Bangladesh
households reported improvements in educational status. Half of the households stated that their expectations regarding the benefits of migration were fully satisfied. An additional one-third was partially satisfied and 8% was dissatisfied4. At destination, migrants report improved food security (30% of the households), economic conditions (18%) and education status (17%). However, 11% of migrants reported a deterioration of food security conditions at destination. Migrant households on average consume more calories per capita (2362.65) than non-migrant households (2300.21), use less severe coping strategies and report improvements in the frequency of meals, quality of food, type of house and toilet
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST)
12
1 What are the characteristics of internal migration?
1. As internal migration improves household food security and well being, it is a livelihood option of which households cannot be deprived. However, rapid migration might also worsen living conditions both at origin (by depleting human capital) and at destination (mainly as a result of congestion)2. Policy makers can maximize the benefits of internal migration by supporting initiatives that leverage the opportu-nities arising from migration and remittances. For instance, enhancing the productive use of migrants’ remittances can be supported by facilitating safe and less costly money transfers, and promoting financial inclusion through micro-finance and financial literacy programs and thus to facilitate savings, investments and access to credit3. Improved incomes and living conditions in rural areas are key to containing the pace of rural out-migration. Sustained investments towards more diversified, higher value-added agriculture and rural non-farm activities can increase incomes, employment and entrepreneurial opportunities both on and off farms. Enhanced access to diversified agricultural inputs and services (ranging from extension to credit), public invest-ment in infrastructure and support to private investments in rural agro-based marketing and processing are required to contain rural-urban income differentials4. Enhanced education facilities in rural areas are required to reduce the need for children and youth to migrate for educa-tional purposes. Improved primary, secondary and vocational education can also contribute to enhancing labour skills and generating better employment opportunities in both rural and urban areas
Answers from the research
Implications for Policy
2 What are the determinants of migration?
3 Is the food security status of migrant households different from non-migrant households at origin?
FPMURESEARCH SUMMARY
4 Is the food security status of migrant households different from non-migrant households at destination?
www.nfpcsp.orgFood Planning and Monitoring Unit (FPMU)
Ministry of FoodKhaddya Bhaban
16 Abdul Ghani road Dhaka - 1000Bangladesh
This research summary was prepared by the Food Planning and Monitoring Unit (FPMU) of the Ministry of Food of the Government of Bangladesh, with the assistance of the National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening
Programme (NFPCSP). The NFPCSP is jointly implemented by the FPMU and the Food and Agriculture Organiza-tion of the United Nations (FAO)
NFPCSP is financially supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the European Union (EU)
June 2014 12FPMU Research Summary
