Session 5: Decision making for eradication and quarantine zones
-
Upload
plant-biosecurity-cooperative-research-centre -
Category
Science
-
view
22 -
download
0
Transcript of Session 5: Decision making for eradication and quarantine zones
PowerPoint Presentation
Decision making for surveillance and quarantine
Grant Hamilton & Peter BaxterPlant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre
biosecurity built on scienceWhat is the problem?Urgent need for efficient and effective methods to plan surveillance and quarantineIncorporate multiple layers of data to better plan surveillance and qzones
Decisions in the face of uncertaintyinitially with limited data how to obtain new data how to incorporate new data into the decision response
Briefly summarize the specific problem or issue that your research is addressing?
biosecurity built on science
2
What are we doing about it?How will your research address the problem or issue?create applied methods that support data capture and decision makingUAVs effective flight paths Optimising methods for surveillance, qzones risk maps and networks Spatial analysis- Qfly natural barriers
biosecurity built on science
3
Planning effective surveillance for detectionUAVUnmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveillance how do flight-plans perform faced withdetection errorsorganisms spatial ecology
Best performing UAV flight plansunderlying detection erroraggregation
Infestation intensityBaxter & Hamilton (2015). MODSIM2015: 1393-1398Fine-tuning of unmanned aerial surveillance for ecological systems. high+fast
biosecurity built on science
4
Range of recommendationsegSmall detection error, high density, regular spatial pattern = Low and Fast flightsDetecting an incursion High and Fast flights (for moderate to low detection error)
biosecurity built on scienceResultsExample of incursionresponseRandomised risk-weighted search
Sites+ Infected SearchingX DetectedIf ALWAYS looking nearInfected property, sub optimal result
Ensure surveillance is not toonarrowly focused
Next step is to translate surveillance into..
biosecurity built on science
6
Surveillance prioritisation through time. week: 100 300 400
Priortzn basis:
Risk = proximity to known infections
Risk = Estimated natural & social spread
spread of infection
biosecurity built on scienceRun FUSIMOD till about line 160 (to get farms and connection matrices set up)Put in a stop at ~line (if mod (t, 100) ==0) for those, do:K>> [~,farmRanks]=sort(rankedFarms);K>> mapFarms(farmXY, farmArea, farmRanks)K>> axis([-10 110 -10 110])K>> set(gca, 'xticklabel','', 'yticklabel','')
K>> mapFarms(farmXY, farmArea, sum(farmSocMat,2))K>> axis([-10 110 -10 110])7
Adding extra layers: transmission risk and control using networksRisk networks and Incursion Response rulesMultiple networksHuman:socio-economic ( informed by tracing data)roadagronomists as vectors
Abiotic:environmental gradient extreme-event mixing
15 farms; 3 agronomists cover 10 farms
biosecurity built on science
8
Farm networkQuarantine approachesShows extra effect of agronomists (note increased scale of connection strength)
biosecurity built on science
9
Farm networkQuarantine approachesShows extra effect of agronomists (note increased scale of connection strength)
biosecurity built on science
10
Networks of Panama tracing
Real tracing data from the Panama incursion: 336 tracing connections
Data manipulation for this:Excluded non-banana properties Recategorised into 5 types of connection. Listed by decreasing risk:Plant material e.g. planting material, debris Equipment sharinge.g. irrigation, earth-movers People movemente.g. crop consultants, packers Geographic links e.g. proximity, shared drainage line Othere.g. rubbish collection, fuel delivery of
Randomly assigned positions in space to preserve anonymity
biosecurity built on science
11
Tracing through a farm networkShared plant material only
biosecurity built on science
12
Tracing through a farm networkEquipment sharing only
biosecurity built on science
13
Tracing through a farm networkGeographic links
biosecurity built on science
14
Tracing through a farm networkCombined links assuming all bi-directional
biosecurity built on science
15
Transmission risk and controlRisk networks and Incursion Response rulesQuarantine rules from human network links:
Blanket:moderate widespread restrictionsTargeted:IPs isolated, weaker widespread restrictions Path-based:reduce all road and agronomist linksLink-based:reduce connections from sites within fixed radius of IPs
Surveillance Risk-based heuristic to optimised search method (Parnell et al. 2014)
biosecurity built on scienceLink-based: Half median distance between all connections in the network based on real data. Still need distance. Reduce p(cnxn) by 50% 16
ResultsNo management(meanSE, 1000 runs/simulation)Infection intensity,hectares(fungal load)
# farms infected
biosecurity built on sciencething=infx225; round(mean(sum(sum(thing)))), round(mean(sum(sum(thing>0))))17
ResultsEffect of different quarantine measures(meanSE)BlanketTargetedPath-basedLink-based
Infection intensity,hectares
# farms infectedQuarantine:reduce connections from sites within fixed radius of IPs
biosecurity built on sciencething=infx225; round(mean(sum(sum(thing)))), round(mean(sum(sum(thing>0))))18
ResultsEffect of different quarantine measures(meanSE)BlanketTargetedPath-basedLink-based
Infection intensity,hectares
# farms infectedQuarantine:
For latest results Peter Baxter at 1:30pm Thursday
biosecurity built on sciencething=infx225; round(mean(sum(sum(thing)))), round(mean(sum(sum(thing>0))))19
QFLY population genetics project:
Image: www.goulburnrivervalley.com.au/stakeholderinformation/are-you-giving-accurate-information-about-fruit-fly Aim: to examine the population genetic structure of QFLY in the former Fruit Fly Exclusion ZoneIf genetic structure exists, link barriers to gene flow with landscape features Identify putative source(s) of current infestation
biosecurity built on scienceQfly Genetics: progress to date10 microsatellite markers screened279 flies from 23 siteshigh levels of polymorphism for most lociLocus Ho Ht# AllelesAllelic richnessBt32 0.753 0.830 16 7.034Bt11 0.699 0.738 9 4.7341.7.7 0.035 0.035 5 1.311Bt4.1A 0.306 0.522 6 2.403Bt15 0.429 0.694 5 3.953Bt14 0.559 0.587 5 3.861Bt10 0.469 0.558 9 4.082Bt1.7 0.642 0.736 15 5.515Bt8.6A 0.733 0.847 22 7.221Bt17 0.703 0.720 6 4.305
SiteSample SizeBilbul6Cobram South22Coleambally2Corbie Hill25Darlington Point13Griffith9Hanwood11Hillston18Kialla Central16Leeton14Merbein27Mooroopna23Murrami5Narrandera1Nericon9Paytners Sliding20Stanbridge5Stoney Point5Summerton Park21Tharbogang12Whilton6Yanco2Yenda7
NB: Blue sites located in Victoria
biosecurity built on scienceResults: population genetic structure analysis
Stoney PtStanbridgeYendaYancoBilbulCobram SthColeamballyCorbie HillDarlington PtGriffithHanwoodHillstonKialla CentralLeetonMerbeinMooroopnaNericonNarranderaPaytners SlidingSummerton PkWhiltonTharbogangMurrami2 population genetic clusters identified in structure analysis
biosecurity built on sciencePopulation genetic structure analysis
Paytners SlidingStanbridgeStoney PointYancoYendaTharbogangWhiltonMurramiNarranderaNericonHanwoodHillstonLeetonColeamballyDarlington PtGriffithBilbulCorbie Hill
Riverina Protected Areas
Each pie graph shows the proportion of individuals with that had a proportion of membership of >0.8 to one of the 2 identified clusters Grey = unssigned (