Session 02-Pertamina 2

82
DIAGENESIS DIAGENESIS DEFINITION: THOSE NATURAL CHANGES WHICH OCCUR IN SEDIMENTS BETWEEN THE TIME OF INITIAL DEPOSITION AND METAMORPHISM COMMON CARBONATE MINERALOGIES COMMON CARBONATE MINERALOGIES MINERAL FORMULA CHARACTERISTICS ARAGONITE CaCO 3 TRACE IMPURITIES; ORTHORHOMBIC MG-CALCITE CaCO 3 4-25% Mg IMPIRITIES; HEXAGONAL CALCITE CaCO 3 TACE IMPURITIES; HEXAGONAL DOLOMITE CaMg(CO 3 ) 2 50% or so Mg; HEXAGONAL

Transcript of Session 02-Pertamina 2

Page 1: Session 02-Pertamina 2

DIAGENESISDIAGENESISDEFINITION:

THOSE NATURAL CHANGES WHICH OCCUR IN SEDIMENTS BETWEEN THE TIME OF INITIAL DEPOSITION AND METAMORPHISM

COMMON CARBONATE MINERALOGIESCOMMON CARBONATE MINERALOGIESMINERAL FORMULA CHARACTERISTICS

ARAGONITE CaCO3 TRACE IMPURITIES;ORTHORHOMBIC

MG-CALCITE CaCO3 4-25% Mg IMPIRITIES;HEXAGONAL

CALCITE CaCO3 TACE IMPURITIES; HEXAGONAL

DOLOMITE CaMg(CO3)2 50% or so Mg; HEXAGONAL

Page 2: Session 02-Pertamina 2

DIAGENETIC PHENOMENA AFFECTING CARBONATES

• MINERALOGIC STABILIZATIONARAGONITE, CALCITE

• NEOMORPHISM (REPLACEMENT)CALCITE, CALCITE

• DOLOMITIZATIONCALCITE, DOLOMITE

• CEMENTATIONVOID-FILLING CALCITE,DOLOMITE or EVAPORITES

• SILICIFICATION• PRESSURE SOLUTION /

COMPACTION• DISSOLUTION /

KARSTIFICATION• BRECCIATION / FRACTURING

Page 3: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 4: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 5: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 6: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 7: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 8: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 9: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 10: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 11: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 12: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 13: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 14: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 15: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 16: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 17: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 18: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 19: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 20: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 21: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 22: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 23: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 24: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 25: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 26: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 27: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 28: Session 02-Pertamina 2

FRESH WATER VADOSE ENVIRONMENT

• CEMENTS TEND TO BE– MENISCUS– PENDULOUS– EQUANT CALCITE– RHOMBIC CALCITE

• OTHER CHARACTERISTICS– LEACHING OF ARAGONITE– SLIGHT CEMENTATION– COMMON POROSITY

Page 29: Session 02-Pertamina 2

FRESH WATER PHREATIC ENVIRONMENT

• CEMENTS TEND TO BE– ISOPACHOUS BLADED– EQUANT CALCITE– INTERLOCKING CRYSTALS– COARSER TO PORE CENTER

• OTHER CHARACTERISTICS– SOME LEACHING OF ARAGONITE; LEACHING MAY BE ACCOMPANIED BY

CALCITE REPLACEMENT.– LOW POROSITY– RAPID CEMENTATION– SYNTAXIAL OVERGROWTHS ON ECHINODERMS

Page 30: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 31: Session 02-Pertamina 2

MARINE PHREATIC ENVIRONMENT

• CEMENTS TEND TO BE– ISOPACHOUS ARAGONITE NEEDLES– MICRITIC Mg-CALCITE– COMMONLY INTERBEDDED WITH INTERNAL SEDIMENT– SOMETIMES BOTRYOIDAL– SOMETIMES BORED

• OTHER CHARACTERISTICS– NO LEACHING– SLOW CEMENTATION EXCEPT WHERE TIDES PUMP WATER

THROUGH SEDIMENT– POLYGONAL BOUNDARIES– MANY MINOR DISCONFORMITIES

Page 32: Session 02-Pertamina 2

DEEP SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENT

CHARACTERISTICS:

• DISSOLUTION or CEMENTATION POSSIBLE

• SLOW RATES OF DIAGENESIS CAUSED BY:

– NEAR-SURFACE STABILIZATION OF ARAGONITE & Mg-CALCITE TO FORM CALCITE

– NEAR-SURFACE CEMENTATION REDUCES POROSITY & PERMEABILITY WHICH INHIBITS WATER MOVEMENT IN THE DEEP SUBSURFACE

Page 33: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 34: Session 02-Pertamina 2

BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DOLOMITE FORMATION

•• SOURCE OF MgSOURCE OF MgSEAWATERMf-RICH CLAYS FOR CEMENTSKELETAL Mg CALCITE

•• FLUID FLOW SYSTEMFLUID FLOW SYSTEM•• SUITABLE Mg/Ca RATIOSUITABLE Mg/Ca RATIO

Page 35: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 36: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 37: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 38: Session 02-Pertamina 2

Effects of early Effects of early diagenesisdiagenesis on reservoir quality,on reservoir quality,Burial Burial diagenesisdiagenesis will modify reservoir Quality (RQ)will modify reservoir Quality (RQ)

further information required in purplefurther information required in purple

INITIALLY POROUSAND PERMEABLE UNIT(Sedimentology)

MARINE DIAGENESIS following depositionCementation, little effect on poroperm.no dissolution

EXPOSED(Sedimentology)

Close tounconformity

METEORIC PHREATIClimited dissolution,cementation by low Mgcalcite around grains

METEORIC VADOSEExtensive dissolutionlimited but patchy cementation(especially at pore throats)

Poroperm decrease, frameworkresistant to mechanical compactionduring burial

Porosity increase, permeabilitylowered, framework resistant tomechanical compaction

COMPACTIONLIMITED?

RQ poor RQ good RQ moderate RQ moderate RQ moderate - good

no yes

no yes

no yes

yes no

Page 39: Session 02-Pertamina 2

Effects of Burial diagenesis on reservoir quality

COMPACTION(Effective Stress)

CEMENTATION(Petrography)

DISSOLUTION(Petrography)

BURIAL DOLOMITISATION(Petrography)

FRACTURING(Well Data)

UPLIFT AND EXPOSURE(Seismic)

Quantificationof effects?

Source of cementExtent of cement

Cementation

Yes(compartmentalise)

No source of cement?Hydrocarbon filling?(Geochemistry)

local

(Gheochemistry)

regional

Reprecipitation as cementElsewhere in basin

No(inc. permeability)

Import of Ca MgCO3

Yes

No

mechanical

chemical

further information required in purple

RQREDUCED

RQREDUCED

RQIMPROVED

RQREDUCED

RQIMPROVED

RQ MAYIMPROVED

RQMAINTAINED

RQREDUCED

RQREDUCED

RQIMPROVED

RQMAINTAINED

Process 1 2A 2B 3A 3B 4A 4B 5A 5BPor. -ve -ve 0 +ve -ve -ve 0 0 0Perm. -ve -ve 0 +ve -ve -ve +ve -ve +ve

1

yes no2A

2B

3A 3B

4A

4B

5A

5B

Page 40: Session 02-Pertamina 2

COMPARISON OF MAJOR SUBSURFACE DIAGENETIC CONTROLS

IMPORTANTUNIMPORTANTTEMPERATURE

VERY IMPORTANTUNIMPORTANTPRESSURE

LONG PERIODSHORT PERIODTIME OF RESIDENCE

LOWVERY HIGHRATE OF WATER INFLUX

SLIGHT VARIATIONWIDE VARIATIONEQUILIBRIUM CONDITIONS

MINIMAL IMPORTANCE

VERY IMPORTANTMINERAL STABILIZATION

VERY IMPORTANTMINIMAL IMPORTANCE

STRUCTURAL CONTROL

BURIAL DIAGNESISNEAR-SURFACE

Page 41: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 42: Session 02-Pertamina 2

PROBLEMS withCARBONATE RESERVOIR

Heterogeneous porosity and permeability complex depositional environments diagenetic overprints

Page 43: Session 02-Pertamina 2

What are the most important controls onWhat are the most important controls onreservoir quality in carbonate sequences?reservoir quality in carbonate sequences?

The main controls on reservoir quality (porosity and permeability)in carbonate sequences are :

• depositional fabric (primary lithofacies, texture)• mineral dissolution (creation of secondary porosity)• mineral precipitation (cementation and replacement)• karstification (an important from of mineral

dissolution/precipitation)• compaction• fracturing

Page 44: Session 02-Pertamina 2

Effects of meteoric Effects of meteoric diagenesisdiagenesison reservoir qualityon reservoir quality

Effects on RQif yes

Meteoric Diagenesis

• Was there an aragonite precursor? (I.e. of Pre-Cambrian, Carboniferous, Permian, Triassic or Tertiary age)

• Was it a humid climate at time of exposure? (Palaeogeographic position)

• Was there a high rate of water drainage? (elevation, climate, size of hinterland)

• Was reprecipitation of dissolved CaCO3 as cement limited (due to high drainage)?

+ve

+ve

+ve

+ve

Page 45: Session 02-Pertamina 2

Effects of Effects of karstificationkarstificationon reservoir qualityon reservoir quality

Effects on RQif yes

Sequence Boundary Karst

• Is there a joint/fracture system which may have had high water throuhput? (may be so if in faulted/folded terrain, if uplifted or recognizable on seismic)

• Was there an aragonite precursor? (I.e. of Pre-Cambrian, Carboniferous, Permian, Triassic or Tertiary age)

• Is the reservoir close to the unconformity/above the water table?

• Is the pore system matrix dominated? (vuggy porosity may have poor permeability, caverns may be detrimentalto drilling)

• Can overlying clays/shales be ruled out? (May infiltrate porous zone beneath)

+ve

+ve

+ve

+ve

+ve

Page 46: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 47: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 48: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 49: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 50: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 51: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 52: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 53: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 54: Session 02-Pertamina 2

RESERVOIR QUALITY

< 10 md< 5 %POOR

10 – 50 md5 – 15 %FAIR

> 50 md> 15 % GOOD

> 100 md> 20 %EXCELLENT

PERMPOROSITY

Page 55: Session 02-Pertamina 2

Recurrent carbonate reservoir types (after Wilson, 1983)

• MIDDLE-SHELF GRAINSTONE BARS WITH PRIMARY (or MODIFIED PRIMARY) POROSITY

• MIDDLE- and OUTER-SHELF REEFS2a. PRIMARY POROSITY IN BOUNDSTONES and

ASSOCIATED GRAINSTONES2b. INTERCRYSTALLINE POROSITY and FRACTURE

POROSITY if dolomitized• GRAINSTONES AND BRECCIAS of SLOPE DEPOSITS• INNER-SHELF DOLOMITES (INTERCRYSTALLINE POROSITY

and VUGGY POROSITY) WITH ANHYDRITE SEALS – TIDAL FLAT DEPOSITS

• DISSOLUTION, PALEOKARST DEVELOPMENT and DOLOMITIZATION BELOW REGIONAL UNCONFORMITIES

• FRACTURED CARBONATE RESERVOIRS• CHALKS with INTERCRYSTALLINE POROSITY and FRACTURE

POROSITY

Page 56: Session 02-Pertamina 2

PERMEABILITAS OF ROCKS AND SEDIMENTS

• Tightly cemented criniodal limestone ……10 md• Uncemented carbonate mud ……0.01 – 10 md• Sucrosic dolomite ……0.1 – 150 md• Cemented quartz or sandstone

or carbonate grainstone ……10 – 300 md• Poorly cemented quartz sandstone

or carbonate grainstone ……300 – 500 md• Unconsolidated quartz sandstone

or carbonate grainstone ……>1000 md• Fractured sandstone or carbonate ……>1000 md

Page 57: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 58: Session 02-Pertamina 2

WP POROSITYintraparticle porosity

• Refers to pores formed where soft body parts lived in body cavities (e.g., gatropods) or pores where internal partitioning in otherwise solid material (e.g., rudist wall structures)

• may add considerably to the total porosity of grainstones and packstones

• are commonly enlarged by dissolution to form moldicor vuggy porosity

• an example follows of 10 perm plugs measured from three coral heads (Holocene), yielding average porosities of 47, 63 and 53 %

Page 59: Session 02-Pertamina 2

BC POROSITY intercrystalline porosity

• Forms between crystals of dolomite or limestone

• provides one of the most “evenly distributed”types of porosity in carbonates (except for vugs)

• occurs as mesoporosity and macroporosity in dolomites

• occurs as microporosity in limestone (within the lime mud matrix

Page 60: Session 02-Pertamina 2

BP POROSITYinterparticle porosity

• Intergranular pores from spherical triangles between packed spheres and irregular between platy grain shapes

• rare in lithified rock--not commonly preserved due to cementation

• commonly is modified by thin isopachous rim cements that form in the marine phreatic

• common in jurassic carbonate of the Middle East and accounts for the success of these giant reservoirs

Page 61: Session 02-Pertamina 2

KV POROSITYkeystone vug porosity

• Forms by the natural bridging of sand grains to form a “keystone arch” with pore space below it

• forms in the swash zone of beaches• relatively rare porosity type • recognized in the Pleistocene of the

Bahamas

Page 62: Session 02-Pertamina 2

FENESTRAL POROSITY

• A porosity type commonly associated with algal stromatolite lithofacies

• voids formed within algal laminations by algae forming bridges and growing over other algal layers or by air/gas pockets within algal layers

• “fenestra” means window in latin and refers to the window-like openings within algal layers

• fenestral porosity may not be effective porosity

Page 63: Session 02-Pertamina 2

GF POROSITYgrowth framework porosity

• associated with boundstone fabrics and reefs• created by branches or tubes winding and

bridging together to form pore space betweentheir framework elements (not within them)

• one of the most difficult pore types to indentify• may be relatively unimportant, since detritus

commonly fills such spaces at the time of deposition

Page 64: Session 02-Pertamina 2

MO and VUG POROSITYmoldic and vuggy porosity

• molds retain original particle shape • vugs are irregular in shape• aragonite grains are subject to dissolution and

the formation of molds and vugs• molds can leach further to form vugs• the term MV porosity is coined for moldic-vuggy

porosity combinations that are often difficult to separate

• moldic porosity (especially oomoldic) may represent isolated pores with non-effective porosity

Page 65: Session 02-Pertamina 2

FR POROSITYfracture porosity

• Brittle versus ductile behavior: dolomites fracture more readily than limestones

• Orientation of most natural fractures is verticle• Maximum amount of porosity due to fracturing (e.g.,

in the Monterrey Shale of California) is about 6 %• It is commonly beneficial to induce fracturing in the

area surrounding the borehole to increase daily production rates: acid-fracs with propants

• Presence of fractures is critical for reservoir faciesdevelopment in tight boundstones that grade to wackestones and in chalk deposits (coccolithmudstones)

Page 66: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 67: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 68: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 69: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 70: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 71: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 72: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 73: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 74: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 75: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 76: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 77: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 78: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 79: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 80: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 81: Session 02-Pertamina 2
Page 82: Session 02-Pertamina 2